The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus

Review article: the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications.

AIM

To review the current knowledge on the underlying factors contributing to GERD, with particular emphasis on the most recent research.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in Medline and EMBASE. The abstracts from recent large congresses were also reviewed to ensure coverage of the latest findings.

RESULTS

The pathophysiological factors causing GERD can be split into those inducing greater exposure of the oesophagus to stomach contents, and those that provide increased perception of reflux or increased mucosal damage. Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, which are likely to be triggered by gastric distension, appear to be a key physiological cause of GERD. Excessive reflux may also be provoked by impaired oesophageal or gastric clearance mechanisms. Pre-epithelial, epithelial and post-epithelial defences all normally protect the oesophagus from injury, and may be compromised in individuals with GERD. Heartburn could also be caused by oesophageal hypersensitivity as a result of visceral neural pathway dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial, and abnormalities in the gastro-oesophageal junction, the stomach, the oesophagus and the nervous system may all contribute to this disease state.

Effect of baseline symptom severity on patient-reported outcomes in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcome instruments are becoming increasingly important tools in clinical trials. We aimed to investigate the effect of baseline symptom severity on: (i) a global rating of change using the Overall Treatment Effect questionnaire; (ii) the change from baseline for some commonly used questionnaires, namely the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire; and (iii) treatment differences assessed by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

We used pooled data from two 4-week studies of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (but without endoscopically verified esophagitis) randomized either to esomeprazole (20 or 40 mg) or to omeprazole 20 mg. We also used data from a study of omeprazole (10 or 20 mg) or ranitidine 300 mg in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without esophagitis. The analysis is based on descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Little impact of baseline symptoms/problems exists on the global rating of change (Overall Treatment Effect questionnaire). For example, the percentage of patients experiencing a large improvement with acid-suppressive therapy according to Overall Treatment Effect ranged from 63.2% for those with mild reflux at baseline to 70.3% for those with severe reflux. Change from baseline in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale reflux dimension and quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia sleep disturbance and food/drink problems dimensions were associated with baseline symptoms/problems, with the largest change seen for patients with severe symptoms/problems at baseline. Baseline symptom severity was also associated with a clear effect on treatment differences, which tended to be larger for patients with severe symptoms than for patients with mild baseline symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, baseline symptom/problem severity had little association with the global rating of change, whereas a clear association with change in symptoms/problems and on treatment differences was apparent. The magnitude of change increased with increasing baseline severity of symptoms/problems.

Medical therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Proton pump inhibitors remain the mainstay of medical therapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Despite their increasing use, up to 40% of patients are not fully satisfied with their antireflux therapy. Recent data on efficacy and safety are reviewed and causes of failure are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several randomized studies and a metaanalysis have shown marginal differences in efficacy between various proton pump inhibitor regimens. In subgroups, however, such as severe esophagitis, esomeprazole may be superior. Poor compliance is one of the main causes of failure. Nonacid reflux is likely to play an important role, especially in patients with regurgitation or cough persisting on therapy. Genetic polymorphisms involved in proton pump inhibitor metabolism, Helicobacter pylori infection or nocturnal acid breakthrough during therapy are probably less important than initially suspected. Recent pharmacological developments include new proton pump inhibitor isomers, potassium competitive acid blockers and inhibitors of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations.

SUMMARY

There are still important unmet needs in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Optimizing acid control is unlikely to improve the condition of the majority of patients with incomplete proton pump inhibitor response. Inhibition of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations remains the major pharmacological target for future drug development.

Review article: the role of surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Rates for laparoscopic fundoplication are declining in the United States and there is no consensus on the indications for referral to surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To highlight recent studies on the outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication in adults that cast doubt on the traditional indications for surgery in reflux disease.

RESULTS

Patients who are well maintained on medical therapy have more to lose with surgical intervention than to gain, and should not be offered surgery. Likewise, the notion that surgery prevents oesophageal cancer is a hypothesis that is not supported by current evidence, therefore surgical intervention should not be offered to these patients. The only clear-cut candidates for surgery include: patients with anatomic abnormalities such as a large hiatus hernia, or those with persistent regurgitation that causes troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy; and carefully selected patients with extra-oesophageal disorders who have symptoms of reflux disease such as heartburn and regurgitation, an incomplete response to medical therapy and persistent plus demonstrable reflux on pH or impedance testing that is associated with their symptoms. Patients should be aware of the high likelihood of needing continued acid inhibitory therapy following surgery and the possibility of side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Only a few carefully selected patients should undergo fundoplication for reflux disease.

Long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease with pantoprazole

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic, relapsing disease that can progress to major complications. Affected patients have poorer health-related quality of life than the general population. As GERD requires continued therapy to prevent relapse and complications, most patients with erosive esophagitis require long-term acid suppressive treatment. Thus GERD results in a significant cost burden and poor health-related quality of life. The effective treatment of GERD provides symptom resolution and high rates of remission in erosive esophagitis, lowers the incidence of GERD complications, improves health-related quality of life, and reduces the cost of this disease. Proton pump inhibitors are accepted as the most effective initial and maintenance treatment for GERD. Oral pantoprazole is a safe, well tolerated and effective initial and maintenance treatment for patients with nonerosive GERD or erosive esophagitis. Oral pantoprazole has greater efficacy than histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists and generally similar efficacy to other proton pump inhibitors for the initial and maintenance treatment of GERD. In addition, oral pantoprazole has been shown to improve the quality of life of patients with GERD and is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction with therapy. GERD appears to be more common and more severe in the elderly, and pantoprazole has shown to be an effective treatment for this at-risk population.

Validity of endoscopic classification of nonerosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Minimal changes, such as erythema without sharp demarcation or whitish turbidity of the lower esophageal mucosa, have recently been used for endoscopic classification of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) in Japan. This study examined the usefulness of such changes in characterizing the pathophysiology of NERD.

METHODS

Physicians specializing in esophageal endoscopy performed endoscopy on 115 patients with NERD. Based on the presence or absence of minimal changes, patients were categorized as displaying NERD with minimal changes (grade M, n = 49) or with no minimal changes or mucosal breaks (grade N, n = 66). Clinical features, quality of life (QOL) scores, and ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH values were compared between groups. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH values were monitored in 31 patients (14 grade M and 17 grade N patients) who gave consent out of 115 patients.

RESULTS

In ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, 57.1% (8/14) of grade M patients had pH < 4 more than 4% of the time (abnormal acid reflux) compared with 11.8% (2/17) in the grade N group, a significant difference (P = 0.018). QOL scores did not differ significantly between grades and were significantly lower in both groups compared with the general Japanese population. No significant differences were observed in patient background between the grade M and grade N groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of abnormal acid reflux with NERD is higher in patients with minimal changes than in patients without such changes. Minimal changes are most likely attributable to gastric acid reflux.

The quest for intestinal metaplasia--is it worth the effort?

The columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) has remained an enigma for several decades. Starting with the basics, the definition and diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) continues to be a point of major debate globally leading to definitions that have been restrictive (requiring histologically confirmed intestinal metaplasia) or all-encompassing (simply the presence of CLE at endoscopy). The interest in intestinal metaplasia stems from studies that have consistently demonstrated intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia both adjacent to and remote from esophageal adenocarcinoma. The proponents of not requiring histology suggest that if a sufficient number of biopsies is obtained over an adequate period of time, intestinal metaplasia can usually be demonstrated in such cases and that the true neoplastic potential of the cardiac and fundic-type mucosa detected in the CLE has not been delineated. The optimal number of biopsies required to detect intestinal metaplasia is largely unknown, and in this issue of The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Harrison et al. add to the limited data on this subject. There is ample evidence that once a diagnosis of BE is made, it has significant implications on the financial, psychosocial, and insurance status of the patients. We feel that an optimal, practical definition of BE requires clear, accepted, reproducible, and clinically relevant criteria with evidence of an increased risk of cancer--the most crucial consequence of the lesion--and discuss the pros and cons of the need for documenting intestinal metaplasia in the CLE.

The patient with GORD and chronically recurrent problems

Treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) by means of gastric acid secretion inhibition usually is successful. When symptoms persist despite adequate treatment, correctness of the diagnosis of GORD should be questioned. Quite often dyspeptic symptoms are erroneously interpreted as GORD symptoms. Other causes of treatment failure are insufficient acid suppression and oesophageal hypersensitivity. In the management of patients with persistent symptoms oesophageal pH and impedance monitoring are useful techniques. These may provide answers to the question whether the symptoms are reflux-related and whether acid secretion is adequately suppressed.

Alarm symptoms in primary care

These greatly increase the risk of cancer, but the diagnosis is still rare

Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between alarm symptoms and the subsequent diagnosis of cancer in a large population based study in primary care.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

UK General Practice Research Database. Patients 762 325 patients aged 15 years and older, registered with 128 general practices between 1994 and 2000. First occurrences of haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, and rectal bleeding were identified in patients with no previous cancer diagnosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Positive predictive value of first occurrence of haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, or rectal bleeding for diagnoses of neoplasms of the urinary tract, respiratory tract, oesophagus, or colon and rectum during three years after symptom onset. Likelihood ratio and sensitivity were also estimated.

RESULTS

11.108 first occurrences of haematuria were associated with 472 new diagnoses of urinary tract cancers in men and 162 in women, giving overall three year positive predictive values of 7.4% (95% confidence interval 6.8% to 8.1%) in men and 3.4% (2.9% to 4.0%) in women. After 4812 new episodes of haemoptysis, 220 diagnoses of respiratory tract cancer were made in men (positive predictive value 7.5%, 6.6% to 8.5%) and 81 in women (4.3%, 3.4% to 5.3%). After 5999 new diagnoses of dysphagia, 150 diagnoses of oesophageal cancer were made in men (positive predictive value 5.7%, 4.9% to 6.7%) and 81 in women (2.4%, 1.9 to 3.0%). After 15 289 episodes of rectal bleeding, 184 diagnoses of colorectal cancer were made in men (positive predictive value 2.4%, 2.1% to 2.8%) and 154 in women (2.0%, 1.7% to 2.3%). Predictive values increased with age and were strikingly high, for example, in men with haemoptysis aged 75-84 (17.1%, 13.5% to 21.1%) and in men with dysphagia aged 65-74 (9.0%, 6.8% to 11.7%).

CONCLUSION

New onset of alarm symptoms is associated with an increased likelihood of a diagnosis of cancer, especially in men and in people aged over 65. These data provide support for the early evaluation of alarm symptoms in an attempt to identify underlying cancers at an earlier and more amenable stage.

Positive association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome are common diseases which may be related.

AIM

To examine the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome in Chinese population in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Randomly selected ethnic Chinese were invited to participate in a telephone survey in 1996. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was defined as subjects having heartburn and/or acid regurgitation once weekly or more. Irritable bowel syndrome was diagnosed according to the Rome I criteria. The association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome was calculated using a statistical model which allows the odds ratio to be measured.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred and forty-nine subjects completed the interview (response rate 62%). The population prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome were 5% and 4%, respectively. Thirteen per cent of subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and 11% with irritable bowel syndrome suffered from both gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome. The OR of having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome together was estimated to be 3 (95% CI: 1.05, 6.27) indicating a positive association between the two diseases. This association occurred predominantly in male subjects [OR = 9.3, (95% CI: 2.3, 26.2)] but not as strong in females [OR = 1.5, (95% CI: 0.3, 4.3)]. Younger subjects were statistically more prone to the two diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome, and their association occurs predominantly in male subjects.

Defining the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough: probabilities, possibilities and limitations

The common co-existence of cough and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is well established. However, ascertaining cause and effect is more difficult for many reasons that include occurrence by chance of two common symptoms, the changing definition of GORD, equipment limitations and the lack of randomised controlled trials. Given these difficulties, it is not surprising that there is disparity of opinion between respiratory and gastroenterology society guidelines on the link between GORD and chronic cough. This commentary explores of these issues.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for laryngeal symptoms attributed to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Many investigators have proposed an association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms, suggesting that medical or surgical therapy for reflux may be useful.

AIM

To perform a meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of medical or surgical therapy for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal symptoms presumed to be due to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing medical or surgical treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease against placebo were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-September 2005), EMBASE (1974-September 2005), the CCRCT (until September 2005) and abstracts from gastroenterology and ENT meetings. The relative risks of reporting symptomatic improvement or resolution of symptoms was evaluated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five studies using high-dose proton pump inhibitor as intervention met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No surgical studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled relative risk was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.74). There was no heterogeneity between studies but evidence of significant publication bias. Sub-group analysis performed evaluating Jadad scores and symptom type, did not change the relative risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor is no more effective than placebo in producing symptomatic improvement or resolution of laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms. Further studies are necessary to identify the characteristics of patients that may respond to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Review article: from 1906 to 2006--a century of major evolution of understanding of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Our understanding of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has undergone significant changes over the last century.

AIM

To trace the rise in understanding of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and highlight remaining areas of uncertainty.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

In 1906, Tileston published his observations on 'peptic ulcer of the oesophagus'. Winkelstein, in 1934, first correlated symptoms of heartburn with acid regurgitation and reflux oesophagitis. In 1946, Allison described hiatus hernia as a causal factor in the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. In 1958, Bernstein and Baker showed a direct relationship between oesophageal acidification and heartburn in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, irrespective of endoscopic findings, leading to the recognition of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. In the 1980s, continuous recordings of the lower oesophageal sphincter showed that episodes of reflux were related to transient relaxations of lower oesophageal sphincter tone. There is now increasing recognition that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease arises from the interaction of several anatomical and physiological factors. A turning point in the medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease came with the introduction of the first proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, in 1989.

CONCLUSIONS

Future efforts need to identify the multifactorial interactions of gastro-oesophageal junction anatomy and physiology in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Increased understanding of the disease will guide development of new therapies.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Cough is a very common symptom presenting to medical practitioners. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is said to be the causative factor in up to 41% of adults with chronic cough. However cough and GORD are common ailments and their co-existence by chance is high. Also cough can induce reflux episodes. Treatment for GORD includes conservative measures (diet manipulation), pharmaceutical therapy (motility or prokinetic agents, H(2) antagonist and proton pump inhibitors (PPI)) and fundoplication.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of GORD treatment on chronic cough in children and adults with GORD and prolonged cough that is not related to an underlying respiratory disease i.e. non-specific chronic cough.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register Collaboration and Cochrane Airways Group, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. The date of last search was 7th April 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials on GORD treatment for cough in children and adults without primary lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results of searches were reviewed against pre-determined criteria for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected, extracted and assessed data for inclusion. Authors were contacted for further information. Data was analysed as "intention to treat" as well as "treatment received". Paediatric and adults data were considered separately. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies (3 paediatric, 10 adults) were included. Data from six were available for analysis. None of the paediatric studies could be included in meta-analysis. In adults, analysis on use of H(2) antagonist, motility agents and conservative treatment for GORD were not possible (from lack of data) and there were no controlled studies on fundoplication as an intervention. Six adult studies comparing PPI (2-3 months) to placebo were analysed for various outcomes in the meta-analysis. Enrolment of subjects for two studies were primarily from medical clinics and another 4 studies were otolaryngology clinic patients or patients with laryngitis. Using "intention to treat", pooled data from 4 studies resulted in no significant difference between treatment and placebo in total resolution of cough, Odds Ratio 0.46 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.15). Pooled data revealed no overall significant improvement in cough outcomes (end of trial or change in cough scores). Significant differences were only found in sensitivity analyses. A significant improvement in change of cough scores was found in end of intervention (2-3 months) in those receiving PPI with a standardised mean difference of -0.41 (95%CI -0.75, -0.07) using GIV analysis on cross over trials. Two studies reported improvement in cough after 5 days to 2 weeks of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to definitely conclude that GORD treatment with PPI is universally beneficial for cough associated with GORD in adults. The beneficial effect was only seen in sub-analysis and its effect was small. The optimal duration of such a trial of therapy to evaluate response could not be ascertained in the meta-analysis although two RCTs reported significant change by 2 weeks of therapy. Clinicians should be cognisant of a period (natural resolution with time) and placebo effect in studies that utilise cough as an outcome measure. Data in children are inconclusive. Future paediatric and adult studies are needed whereby studies should be double blind, randomised controlled, parallel design, using treatments for at least two months, with validated subjective and objective cough outcomes and include ascertainment of time to respond as well as assessment of acid and/or non acid reflux whilst on therapy.

The role of proton-pump inhibitor therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and difficult-to-control asthma

Difficult-to-control asthma is a frustratingly difficult condition to treat. Many factors contribute to this condition, including gastroesophageal reflux disease. Response to potent acid suppressive therapy with proton-pump inhibitors is less than universal or complete, and underlines the multifactorial nature of the disease. However, the authors of this paper feel strongly that, whereas gastroesophageal reflux disease can be reliably identified, patients with difficult-to-control asthma will experience an improvement in symptoms when treated with acid-suppressive therapy, while bearing in mind that other contributory factors may have to be eliminated at the same time.

Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of adults experience heartburn, the cardinal feature of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), at least monthly. The evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected GORD is associated with a substantial economic burden. Most patients are treated empirically (without specific diagnostic evaluation). They include a wide range of underlying oesophageal injury. The severity of oesophageal injury can only be established in those who have undergone upper endoscopy. Patients without visible damage to the oesophagus have been referred to as having endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD). The pathogenesis of ENRD as well as its response to treatment may differ from GORD with oesophagitis.

OBJECTIVES

Summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of the short-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and prokinetics in adults with GORD, treated empirically and in those with endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (January 1988 to December 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials focussing on symptomatic outcome after short-term treatment for GORD using proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists or prokinetic agents. Studies were included provided that participants could be classified in the empirical treatment group (no endoscopy used in treatment allocation) or in the endoscopy negative reflux disease group (no endoscopic signs of erosive oesophagitis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one trials (9457 participants) were included: fifteen in the empirical treatment group, twelve in the ENRD group and four in both. In empirical treatment of GORD the relative risk (RR) for heartburn remission (the primary efficacy variable) in placebo-controlled trials for PPI was 0.37 (two trials, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.44), for H2RAs 0.77 (two trials, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) and for prokinetics 0.86 (one trial, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01). In a direct comparison PPIs were more effective than H2RAs (seven trials, RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) and prokinetics (two trials, RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87). In treatment of ENRD, the RR for heartburn remission for PPI versus placebo was 0.69 (seven trials, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.78) and for H2RA versus placebo was 0.84 (two trials, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). The RR for PPI versus H2RA was 0.78 (three trials, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97) and for PPI versus prokinetic 0.72 (one trial, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPIs are more effective than H2RAs in relieving heartburn in patients with GORD who are treated empirically and in those with ENRD, although the magnitude of benefit is greater for those treated empirically.