Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802)

EMT-Mediated Acquired EGFR-TKI Resistance in NSCLC: Mechanisms and Strategies

Acquired resistance inevitably limits the curative effects of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), which represent the classical paradigm of molecular-targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). How to break such a bottleneck becomes a pressing problem in cancer treatment. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a dynamic process that governs biological changes in various aspects of malignancies, notably drug resistance. Progress in delineating the nature of this process offers an opportunity to develop clinical therapeutics to tackle resistance toward anticancer agents. Herein, we seek to provide a framework for the mechanistic underpinnings on the EMT-mediated acquisition of EGFR-TKI resistance, with a focus on NSCLC, and raise the question of what therapeutic strategies along this line should be pursued to optimize the efficacy in clinical practice.

Post-progression survival is highly linked to overall survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring sensitive EGFR mutations treated with first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) treatment has shown a good response. Subsequent treatments jeopardize the ability to determine the effect of first‐line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). Therefore, using patient‐level data, we aimed to study the associations of progression‐free survival (PFS) and post‐progression survival (PPS) with OS after first‐line EGFR‐TKI treatment in patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC.

Methods

Between November 2006 and December 2016, we analyzed 92 patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC treated with first‐line EGFR‐TKI. The correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were analyzed for each patient.

Results

Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression analyzes showed that PPS correlated highly with OS (r = 0.85, P < 0.05, R² = 0.75), whereas PFS correlated weakly with OS (r = 0.76, P < 0.05, R² = 0.50). The best responses after first‐line and second‐line treatments were significantly associated with PPS.

Conclusions

PPS has a higher impact on OS than PFS in patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC treated with first‐line EGFR‐TKIs. These outcomes suggest that the OS in this patient group may be affected by treatments following first‐line chemotherapy; however, this remains to be verified in prospective trials.

Efficacy and safety of first line treatments for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated, non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of first line treatments for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and several international conference databases, from inception to 20 May 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing two or more treatments in the first line setting for patients with advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC were included in a bayesian network meta-analysis. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following clinical outcome measures: progression free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and adverse events of grade 3 or higher.

RESULTS

18 eligible trials involved 4628 patients and 12 treatments: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; osimertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib), pemetrexed based chemotherapy, pemetrexed free chemotherapy, and combination treatments (afatinib plus cetuximab, erlotinib plus bevacizumab, gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy, and gefitinib plus pemetrexed). Consistent with gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% credible interval 0.72 to 1.24), osimertinib showed the most favourable progression free survival, with significant differences versus dacomitinib (0.74, 0.55 to 1.00), afatinib (0.52, 0.40 to 0.68), erlotinib (0.48, 0.40 to 0.57), gefitinib (0.44, 0.37 to 0.52), icotinib (0.39, 0.24 to 0.62), pemetrexed based chemotherapy (0.24, 0.17 to 0.33), pemetrexed free chemotherapy (0.16, 0.13 to 0.20), afatinib plus cetuximab (0.44, 0.28 to 0.71), and gefitinib plus pemetrexed (0.65, 0.46 to 0.92). Osimertinib and gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy were also consistent (0.94, 0.66 to 1.35) in providing the best overall survival benefit. Combination treatments caused more toxicity in general, especially erlotinib plus bevacizumab, which caused the most adverse events of grade 3 or higher. Different toxicity spectrums were revealed for individual EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses by the two most common EGFR mutation types indicated that osimertinib was associated with the best progression free survival in patients with the exon 19 deletion, and gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy was associated with the best progression free survival in patients with the Leu858Arg mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that osimertinib and gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy were associated with the best progression free survival and overall survival benefits for patients with advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC, compared with other first line treatments. The treatments resulting in the best progression free survival for patients with the exon 19 deletion and Leu858Arg mutations were osimertinib and gefitinib plus pemetrexed based chemotherapy, respectively.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018111954.

First-line treatments in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

Background

It remains unknown which is the optimal first-line treatment regimen for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a network meta-analysis to address this important issue.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and major international scientific meetings were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Progression-free survival (PFS) data was the primary outcome of interest, and overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were the secondary outcomes of interests, reported as hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

25 RCTs with a total of 5005 patients randomized to receive seven treatments were included in the meta-analysis. Third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (osimertinib) and first-generation TKIs (F-TKIs) in combination with chemotherapy (F-TKIs+CT) were more effective than F-TKIs alone in terms of PFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93; P = 0.031 and HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39–0.98; P = 0.041) and OS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43–0.91; P = 0.014 and HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.92; P = 0.008). Second-generation TKIs (S-TKIs) showed significant OS advantage over F-TKIs (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70–0.99; P = 0.04). Based on treatment ranking in terms of PFS and OS, osimertinib had the highest probability of being the most effective treatment (89% and 86%) and with the best tolerability. F-TKIs+CT was ranked the second-most effective regimen, but with relatively high risk of SAEs.

Conclusions

Osimertinib seemed to be the most preferable first-line treatment in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, limitations of the study including a single RCT investigating osimertinib and immature OS data need to be considered.

Optimizing the sequencing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 80-85% of cases. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are observed in approximately 40% and 20% of patients with NSCLC in Asian and non-Asian populations, respectively. First-generation (gefitinib, erlotinib) and second-generation (afatinib, dacomitinib) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been standard-of-care (SoC) first-line treatment for patients with sensitizing EGFR mutation positive advanced NSCLC following Phase III trials versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. However, most patients treated with first-line first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs develop resistance. Osimertinib, a third-generation, central nervous system active EGFR-TKI which potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing (EGFRm) and the most common EGFR T790 M resistance mutations, has shown superior efficacy versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib / erlotinib). Osimertinib is now a treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFRm in the first-line setting, and treatment of choice for patients with T790 M positive NSCLC following disease progression on first-line EGFR-TKIs. The second-generation EGFR-TKI dacomitinib has also recently been approved for the first-line treatment of EGFRm positive metastatic NSCLC. There remains a need to determine appropriate sequencing of EGFR-TKIs in this setting, including EGFR-TKIs as monotherapy or in combination with other TKIs / signaling pathway inhibitors. This review considers the evolving role of sequencing treatments to maximize benefits for patients with EGFRm positive advanced NSCLC.

[A Review of EGFR-TKIs Therapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Uncommon EGFR Mutations]

肺癌是目前最常见的癌症，也是导致癌症死亡的首要原因。非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）占85%以上，且高达50%的亚洲NSCLC患者携带表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）基因突变。研究证明，伴有EGFR突变的NSCLC患者接受表皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR-TKIs）治疗能获得更好的生存结果。然而，因为EGFR罕见突变相对治疗效果较差，会对研究结果带来负面影响，所以大部分研究EGFR-TKIs疗效的临床试验都不包含罕见突变患者，另外EGFR罕见突变本身就少见，就导致临床试验中这部分患者数量较少。由于EGFR罕见突变样本量少且具有高度异质性，EGFR-TKIs对EGFR罕见突变患者的疗效仍然不清楚。本文就EGFR罕见突变与EGFR-TKIs的疗效关系进行综述，为携带EGFR罕见突变的NSCLC患者合理选择治疗方式提供指导和建议。

Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs with or without upfront brain radiotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with central nervous system metastases

Background

Although the clinical efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) in EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been demonstrated, their efficacy in EGFR‐mutant NSCLCs with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and the role of radiotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to determine if it is preferable to add upfront cranial radiotherapy to EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases who received EGFR‐TKIs as a first‐line therapy.

Results

A total of 104 patients were enrolled and 39 patients received upfront brain radiotherapy, while 65 patients received first and second generation EGFR‐TKIs first. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3–9.4). The median survival time (MST) was 24.0 months (95% CI: 20.1–30.1). The overall response rate of the CNS was 37%. The median CNS progression‐free survival (PFS) was 13.2 months (95% CI: 10.0–16.2). Brain radiotherapy prior to EGFR‐TKI prolonged TTF (11.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = 0.038) and tended to prolong CNS‐PFS (15.6 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.096) but was not significantly associated with overall survival (MST 26.1 vs. 24.0 months, P = 0.525). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that poor performance status and the presence of extracranial metastases were poor prognostic factors related to overall survival.

Conclusion

EGFR‐TKI showed a favorable effect for EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases. Prolonged TTF and CNS‐PFS were observed with upfront brain radiotherapy.

Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Some commonly available patient or disease characteristics may be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving EGFR-TKIs (epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) to explore differences in outcomes associated with EGFR-TKIs among subgroups of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Pooled HRs for progression or death (PFS-HRs) and pooled HRs for death (OS-HRs) were compared among sub-groups defined according to baseline clinical and demographic variables as well as type of EGFR mutation. In the entire assessable population of 4465 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, significant interactions with PFS were found for gender (males vs. females; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.2; 95% CI 1.12-1.56), smoking history (smokers vs. non-smokers; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.26; 95% CI 1.05-1.51), and type of EGFR mutation (patients with exon 21 L858R mutation vs. exon 19 deletion; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.39; 95% CI 1.18-1.63). Male patients, smokers and patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation may derive less benefit from EGFR-TKIs compared to female patients, non-smokers and patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion.

Combination of Metformin and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Nondiabetic Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Preclinical and retrospective studies suggested a role for metformin in sensitizing patients who have diabetes with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We therefore examined its effects in combination with gefitinib in patients without diabetes harboring EGFR mutations (EGFRm).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 224 patients without diabetes with treatment-naïve stage IIIB-IV EGFRm NSCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive gefitinib plus either metformin or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1 year and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Serum levels of IL6 were also examined in an exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 19.15 months. The estimated 1-year PFS rates were 41.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.0-52.2] with gefitinib plus metformin and 42.9% (95% CI, 32.6-52.7) with gefitinib plus placebo (P = 0.6268). Median PFS (10.3 months vs. 11.4 months) and median OS (22.0 months vs. 27.5 months) were numerically lower in the metformin group, while ORRs were similar between the two arms (66% vs. 66.7%). No significant treatment group differences were detected across all subgroups with respect to PFS, including those with elevated levels of IL6. Metformin combined with gefitinib resulted in a remarkably higher incidence of diarrhea compared with the control arm (78.38% vs. 43.24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that addition of metformin resulted in nonsignificantly worse outcomes and increased toxicity and hence does not support its concurrent use with first-line EGFR-TKI therapy in patients without diabetes with EGFRm NSCLC.

Imaging of Precision Therapy for Lung Cancer: Current State of the Art

Advances in characterization of molecular and genomic abnormalities specific to lung cancer have made precision therapy the current standard of care for lung cancer treatment. This article will provide a cutting-edge review of imaging of lung cancer in the current era of precision medicine. The focus of the article includes (a) an update on the recent advances in precision therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and their implications on imaging; (b) molecular and genomic biomarkers and pitfalls of image interpretations for lung cancer precision therapy; and (c) review of the current approaches and future directions of precision imaging for lung cancer, emphasizing emerging observations in longitudinal tumor kinetics, radiomics, and molecular and functional imaging. The article is designed to help radiologists to remain up to date in the rapidly evolving world of lung cancer therapy and serve as key members of multidisciplinary teams caring for these patients.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Pathway, Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) and the Regulation of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is a well-studied oncogenic pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subset of advanced NSCLC patients (15–55%) have EGFR-driven mutations and benefit from treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PDL-1 axis are a new anti-cancer therapy for metastatic NSCLC. The anti-PD-1/PDL-1 ICIs showed promising efficacy (~30% response rate) and improved the survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC, but the role of anti-PD-1/PDL-1 ICIs for EGFR mutant NSCLC is not clear. YAP (yes-associated protein) is the main mediator of the Hippo pathway and has been identified as promoting cancer progression, drug resistance, and metastasis in NSCLC. Here, we review recent studies that examined the correlation between the EGFR, YAP pathways, and PD-L1 and demonstrate the mechanism by which EGFR and YAP regulate PD-L1 expression in human NSCLC. About 50% of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs without known targetable secondary mutations. Targeting YAP therapy is suggested as a potential treatment for NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Future work should focus on the efficacy of YAP inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint PD-L1/PD-1 blockade in EGFR mutant NSCLC without targetable resistant mutations.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Here, we compare the relative clinical efficacy of EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) for EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors systematically searched 11 electronic databases from January 2004 to August 2018 for randomized controlled trials measuring clinical efficacy of first-line TKI therapies. Clinical efficacy outcomes included overall survival and progression-free survival. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of first-line EGFR TKIs for overall survival and progression-free survival. This network meta-analysis showed that dacomitinib and osimertinib resulted in improved efficacy outcomes compared with afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib. Both osimertinib and dacomitinib should be considered as standard first-line treatment options for patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Sequential Administration of EGFR-TKI and Pemetrexed Achieved a Long Duration of Response in Advanced NSCLC Patients with EGFR-mutant Tumours

Objectives: The optimal combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and chemotherapy has helped to improve therapeutic effects in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the progression free survival (PFS) of patients after sequential administration of TKI and pemetrexed chemotherapy. Methods: This study retrospectively screened treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR mutations who were prescribed a TKI and salvaged with pemetrexed chemotherapy or vice versa. The total, initial and salvage PFS were collected. Results: The total PFS including both the initial and salvage PFS was 18.0 mon (95% CI: 14.1–21.9 mon), which was not influenced by the sequence of administration (TKI first: 18.0 mon, 95% CI: 15.8–20.2 mon, pemetrexed first: 16.1 mon, 95% CI: 9.1–23.1 mon, HR 0.92, P=0.748). A longer PFS was achieved for TKI over chemotherapy in both the initial (10.6 and 5.9 mon, HR 2.62, P=0.001) and salvage therapy (12.0 and 6.0 mon, HR 1.29, P=0.001). TKI remained effective either before (10.6 mon) or after (12.0 mon) chemotherapy (HR 0.96, P=0.853). The same trend was observed for chemotherapy (5.9 and 6.0 mon for initial and salvage therapy, respectively, HR 0.82, P=0.417). Conclusions: The sequential administration of TKI and pemetrexed chemotherapy achieved a long PFS and was a suitable treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Addition of Anti-PD1 to Chemotherapy in Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have limited treatment options. A novel treatment based on programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as promising therapeutic options for advanced NSCLC. We assessed oncological outcomes of PD-L1 antibody versus docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to analyse the oncological outcomes of anti-PD1 to chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OR=0.68,95%CI=0.61-0.75, P<0.00001) and progression-free survival (OR=0.84,95%CI=0.77-0.92, P=0.0002) were longer with anti-PD1 than with docetaxel in NSCLC. Anti-PD1 was associated with even greater objective response rate than docetaxel (OR=1.61,95%CI=1.16-2.24, P=0.004). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-5 did favor anti-PD1 over docetaxel (OR=0.21,95%CI=0.10-0.42, P<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced NSCLC, we found that there was a superior survival benefit and with a favorable safety profile with anti-PD1 than with docetaxel. More large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to identify relevant biomarkers that have an effect on predicting the population that would most likely benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 for pretreated advanced NSCLC patients.

Real-world data on EGFR/ALK gene status and first-line targeted therapy rate in newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in Northern China: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can significantly prolong overall survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement. However, the real-world evaluation status of ALK/EGFR in China remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study including 1134 patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC (stage IIIb-IV) at 12 Chinese hospitals.

RESULTS

The most common evaluation methods were amplification-refractory mutation system for EGFR status and immunohistochemistry targeting D5F3 for ALK status. Among patients with non-squamous, the EGFR mutation rate was 44.1% and the ALK rearrangement rate was 10.0%. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the EGFR mutation rate was 8.3% and the ALK rearrangement rate was 3.7%. Among all patients, gender (HR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.2-2.4, P = 0.006), smoking history (HR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.3-2.7, P = 0.001), histology (HR = 5.0, 95%CI = 2.4-10.1, P < 0.001), and brain metastases (HR = 1.5, 95%CI = 1.1-2.2, P = 0.017) were independent predictors of EGFR mutation, while age (HR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.7-4.1, P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of ALK rearrangement. The median time from tumor diagnosis to EGFR or ALK status confirmation was 7 and 5 days, respectively. Targeted therapy rate was 73.8% in EGFR-positive patients and 51.4% in ALK-positive patients. There was a negative correlation between the first-line targeted therapy rate and the EGFR mutation detection period (r = -0.152, P = 0.02), while no significant correlation among patients with ALK rearrangement (r = -0.179, P = 0.076).

CONCLUSION

Squamous NSCLC patients should also be routinely tested to determine their EGFR/ALK statuses. The first-line targeted therapy rate remains low in Chinese patients with NSCLC.

Development, validation, and comparison of gene analysis methods for detecting EGFR mutation from non-small cell lung cancer patients-derived circulating free DNA

The feasibility and required sensitivity of circulating free DNA (cfDNA)-based detection methods in second-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment are not well elucidated. We examined T790M and other activating mutations of EGFR by cfDNA to assess the clinical usability. In 45 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating EGFR mutations, cfDNAs were prepared from the plasma samples. EGFR mutations in cfDNA were detected using highly sensitive methods and originally developed assays and these results were compared to tissue-based definitive diagnoses. The specificity of each cfDNA-based method ranged 96–100% whereas the sensitivity ranged 56–67%, indicating its low pseudo-positive rate. In EGFR-TKI failure cohort, 41–46% samples were positive for T790M by each cfDNA-based method, which was comparable to re-biopsy tissue-based T790M positive rates in literature. The concordance of the results for each EGFR mutation ranged from 83–95%. In eight patients, the results of the cfDNA-based assays and re-biopsy-derived tissue-based test were compared. The observed overall agreement ranged in 50–63% in T790M, and in 63–100% in activating EGFR mutations. In this study, we have newly developed three types of assay which have enough sensitivity to detect cfDNA. We also detected T790M in 44% of patients who failed prior EGFR-TKI treatment, indicating that cfDNA-based assay has clinical relevance for detecting acquired mutations of EGFR.

Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI?

The traditional approach to the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring ALK rearrangements or EGFR mutations has been the sequential administration of therapies (sequential treatment approach), in which patients first receive first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are eventually replaced by next-generation TKIs and/or chemotherapy upon disease progression, in a decision optionally guided by tumour molecular profiling. In the past few years, this strategy has been challenged by clinical evidence showing improved progression-free survival, improved intracranial disease control and a generally favourable toxicity profile when next-generation EGFR and ALK TKIs are used in the first-line setting. In this Review, we describe the existing preclinical and clinical evidence supporting both treatment strategies - the 'historical' sequential treatment strategy and the use of next-generation TKIs - as frontline therapies and discuss the suitability of both strategies for patients with EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC.

Complete and Durable Response to Combined Chemo/Radiation Therapy in EGFR Wild-Type Lung Adenocarcinoma with Diffuse Brain Metastases

Most non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are likely to develop brain metastases during the course of their illness. Currently, no consensus on NSCLC patients' treatment with brain metastasis has been established. Although whole brain radiotherapy prolongs the median survival time of approximately 4 months, a cisplatin-pemetrexed combination may also represent a potential option in the treatment of asymptomatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Herein, we report the case of a non-smoker male patient with multiple, large and diffuse brain metastases from an "epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type" lung adenocarcinoma who underwent an overly aggressive chemo/radiation therapy. This approach led to a complete and durable remission of the disease and to a long survival of up to 58 months from diagnosis of primary tumor. The uncommon course of this metastatic disease induced us to describe its oncological management and to investigate the molecular features of the tumor.

Erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Crossover extension and post-hoc analysis of the ENSURE study

OBJECTIVES

Sequential combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and chemotherapy has shown greater benefits than either treatment alone in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this follow-up of the ENSURE study, we evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line erlotinib followed by chemotherapy at progression versus the inverse treatment sequence in 175 Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five of the 175 patients included in the follow-up analysis experienced progressive disease (PD). Those with PD on first-line erlotinib (n = 24) received gemcitabine/cisplatin while those who failed first-line chemotherapy (n = 21) received erlotinib until second-line PD. The primary endpoint was PFS in the crossover subpopulation. Post-hoc analysis of survival outcomes was also measured for the overall population of 175 Chinese patients.

RESULTS

Among patients who crossed over at progression, PFS was comparable between those who received second-line erlotinib and those who received second-line chemotherapy (median, 26.3 months and 23.4 months, respectively; P = 0.529). Regardless of the sequence in which the therapies were administered, patients in the crossover treatment subgroup benefited from either second-line therapy after progression with a median overall survival of 51.6 months versus 23.0 months achieved among patients in the non-crossover treatment subgroup. Post-hoc biomarker analyses of Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression showed that survival benefits with either treatment sequence were similar between patients with circulating free DNA EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21; however, those with undetectable mutations achieved significantly greater survival benefits.

CONCLUSION

In advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, first-line erlotinib followed by chemotherapy at progression demonstrated comparable PFS benefit with the inverse treatment sequence, irrespective of mutation subtype. Utilizing both EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy, irrespective of the sequence, maximizes survival benefits for patients.

Heterogeneous Responses to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) in Patients with Uncommon EGFR Mutations: New Insights and Future Perspectives in this Complex Clinical Scenario

Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations represent a distinct and highly heterogeneous subgroup of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs), that accounts for approximately 10% of all EGFR-mutated patients. The incidence of uncommon EGFR mutations is growing, due to the wider adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnostic purposes, which enables the identification of rare variants, usually missed with available commercial kits that only detect a limited number of EGFR mutations. However, the sensitivity of uncommon mutations to first- and second-generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) is widely heterogeneous and less well known, compared with classic mutations (i.e., exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R point mutation), since most of the pivotal studies with EGFR TKIs in the first line, with few exceptions, excluded patients with rare and/or complex variants. Recently, the third generation EGFR TKI osimertinib further revolutionized the therapeutic algorithm of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but its role in patients harboring EGFR mutations besides exon 19 deletions and/or L858R is largely unknown. Therefore, a better knowledge of the sensitivity of uncommon mutations to currently available EGFR TKIs is critical to guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the treatment of NSCLC patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations with currently approved therapies and to discuss the emerging therapeutic opportunities in this peculiar subgroup of patients, including chemo-immunotherapy combinations, next-generation EGFR TKIs, and novel targeted agents.

Regulation of KIF2A by Antitumor miR-451a Inhibits Cancer Cell Aggressiveness Features in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

In the human genome, miR-451a is encoded close to the miR-144 on chromosome region 17q11.2. Our previous study showed that both strands of pre-miR-144 acted as antitumor miRNAs and were involved in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ) pathogenesis. Here, we aimed to investigate the functional significance of miR-451a and to identify its targeting of oncogenic genes in LUSQ cells. Downregulation of miR-451a was confirmed in LUSQ clinical specimens, and low expression of miR-451a was significantly associated with poor prognosis of LUSQ patients (overall survival: p = 0.035, disease-free survival: p = 0.029). Additionally, we showed that ectopic expression of miR-451a significantly blocked cancer cell aggressiveness. In total, 15 putative oncogenic genes were shown to be regulated by miR-451a in LUSQ cells. Among these targets, high kinesin family member 2A (KIF2A) expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis (overall survival: p = 0.043, disease-free survival: p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis showed that KIF2A expression was an independent prognostic factor in patients with LUSQ (hazard ratio = 1.493, p = 0.034). Aberrant KIF2A expression promoted the malignant transformation of this disease. Analytic strategies based on antitumor miRNAs and their target oncogenes are effective tools for identification of novel molecular pathogenesis of LUSQ.

First-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) including afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib have proven efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, an overall view for comparing efficacy and toxicity on a meta-level is lacking. This study compared efficacy and toxicity of first-line treatment with five different EGFR-TKIs by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, aiming to find eligible literature. Data of PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events were extracted. An NMA based on Bayesian statistics was established to synthesize the efficacy and toxicity of all treatments.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials, including data from 3,539 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, were analyzed. Rank probabilities showed that osimertinib had a potentially better efficacy in terms of PFS and OS compared to all other TKIs. For ORR, afatinib and osimertinib showed a trend of superiority compared to the other four TKIs. Furthermore, there was a high risk of diarrhea and rash for patients treated with afatinib or dacomitinib as well as a moderate risk for treatment with erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a favorable efficacy of osimertinib in terms of PFS and OS compared to all other EGFR-TKIs in patients with NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations. Furthermore, gefitinib, erlotinib, and osimertinib were associated with fewer toxicities compared to the other TKIs. Therefore, osimertinib is indicated as a preferable first-line TKI in patients with activating EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, including in Korea. Systemic therapy including platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted therapy should be provided to patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Applications of targeted therapy, such as an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, in patients with NSCLC and an EGFR mutation or ALK gene rearrangement has enabled dramatic improvements in efficacy and tolerability. Despite advances in research and a better understanding of the molecular pathways of NSCLC, few effective therapeutic options are available for most patients with NSCLC without druggable targets, especially for patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated durable response rates across a broad range of solid tumors, including NSCLC, which has revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors. Here, we review the current status and future approaches of immune checkpoint inhibitors that are being investigated for NSCLC with a focus on pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and ipilimumab.

Targeted Therapies in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment landscape for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically shifted over the past two decades. Targeted or precision medicine has primarily been responsible for this shift. Older paradigms of treating metastatic NSCLC with cytotoxic chemotherapy, while still important, have given way to evaluating tumor tissues for specific driver mutations that can be treated with targeted agents. Patients treated with targeted agents frequently have improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to patients without a targetable driver mutation, highlighting the clinical benefit of precision medicine. In this chapter, we explore the historic landmark trials, the current state of the field, and potential future targets under investigation, in this exciting, rapidly evolving discipline of precision medicine in lung cancer.

A case report of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with long-term survival for over 11 years

RATIONALE

This is the first known report in the English literature to describe a case of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that has been controlled for >11 years.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 71-year-old man visited our hospital because of dry cough.

DIAGNOSIS

Chest computed tomography revealed a tumor on the left lower lobe with pleural effusion, and thoracic puncture cytology indicated lung adenocarcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

Four cycles of carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy reduced the size of the tumor; however, it increased in size after 8 months, and re-challenge chemotherapy (RC) with the same drugs was performed. Repeated RC controlled disease activity for 6 years. After the patient failed to respond to RC, erlotinib was administered for 3 years while repeating a treatment holiday to reduce side effects. The disease progressed, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation analysis of cells from the pleural effusion detected the T790 M mutation. Therefore, osimertinib was administered, which has been effective for >1 year.

OUTCOMES

The patient has survived for >11 years since the diagnosis of lung cancer.

LESSONS

Long-term survival may be implemented by actively repeating cytotoxic chemotherapy and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor administration.

Involvement of dual-strand of the miR-144 duplex and their targets in the pathogenesis of lung squamous cell carcinoma

The prognosis of patients with advanced-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ) is poor, and effective treatment protocols are limited. Our continuous analyses of antitumor microRNAs (miRNAs) and their oncogenic targets have revealed novel oncogenic pathways in LUSQ. Analyses of our original miRNA expression signatures indicated that both strands of miR-144 (miR-144-5p, the passenger strand; miR-144-3p, the guide strand) showed decreased expression in cancer tissues. Additionally, low expression of miR-144-5p significantly predicted a poor prognosis in patients with LUSQ by The Cancer Genome Atlas database analyses (overall survival, P = 0.026; disease-free survival, P = 0.023). Functional assays revealed that ectopic expression of miR-144-5p and miR-144-3p significantly blocked the malignant abilities of LUSQ cells, eg, cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. In LUSQ cells, 13 and 15 genes were identified as possible oncogenic targets that might be regulated by miR-144-5p and miR-144-3p, respectively. Among these targets, we identified 3 genes (SLC44A5, MARCKS, and NCS1) that might be regulated by both strands of miR-144. Interestingly, high expression of NCS1 predicted a significantly poorer prognosis in patients with LUSQ (overall survival, P = 0.013; disease-free survival, P = 0.048). By multivariate analysis, NCS1 expression was found to be an independent prognostic factor for patients with LUSQ patients. Overexpression of NCS1 was detected in LUSQ clinical specimens, and its aberrant expression enhanced malignant transformation of LUSQ cells. Our approach, involving identification of antitumor miRNAs and their targets, will contribute to improving our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of LUSQ.

Genomic Medicine and Implications for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention and Therapy

The pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poorly understood, but recent advances in genomics have increased our understanding of the mechanisms by which hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, alcohol, fatty liver disease, and other environmental factors, such as aflatoxin, cause liver cancer. Genetic analyses of liver tissues from patients have provided important information about tumor initiation and progression. Findings from these studies can potentially be used to individualize the management of HCC. In addition to sorafenib, other multi-kinase inhibitors have been approved recently for treatment of HCC, and the preliminary success of immunotherapy has raised hopes. Continued progress in genomic medicine could improve classification of HCCs based on their molecular features and lead to new treatments for patients with liver cancer.

Update review of skin adverse events during treatment of lung cancer and colorectal carcinoma with epidermal growth receptor factor inhibitors

The past decades have witnessed a rapid increase in the use of molecularly targeted therapies. One class of agents includes the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), which afford patients longer progression-free survival (PFS) times, especially among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Certain adverse effects, particularly skin toxicity, are mainly manifested as rash, xerosis, pruritus, nails changes, hair changes and mucositis. Previous studies reported the adverse events occurred based on the cutaneous inflammation reaction. Treatment recommended glucocorticoids and antibiotics. It is suggested that skin toxicity is an important issue because it usually affects patients' quality of life (QoL) and still causes dose reduction or discontinuation of targeted therapies. For these reasons, more and more oncologists and dermatologists recognize the importance of recognition and management of skin toxicities with the expansion in availability of EGFRIs. In this review, we conducted a systematic review of recent data to examine the types and frequencies of dermatologic toxicities associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies in NSCLC and mCRC. In addition, we would like to explore the management and treatment options currently used by clinicians based on the possible mechanism.

Efficacy of first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) alone or in combination with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with low-abundance mutation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in combination with chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbour low-abundance EGFR mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 76 patients with advanced NSCLC who harboured low-abundance EGFR mutations. The patients were divided into the combination group and the monotherapy group. The combination group received EGFR-TKI combined with a platinum-based regimen. After the end of chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI was administered daily. The monotherapy group was administered EGFR-TKI therapy daily.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in response rate between the different groups. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (PFS: 7.9 months [95% CI,5.73-10.07] vs 5.9 months [95% CI, 4.99-6.81], p = 0.015; OS: 25.8 months[95% CI,16.27-35.33] vs 19.8 months [95% CI, 18.60-21.00], p = 0.047). Subgroup analysis showed that, for patients with the exon 21 L858R mutation, the PFS and OS were significantly longer in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (PFS: 7.2 months vs 5.8 months, p = 0.013; OS: 22.0 months vs 18.7 months, p = 0.024). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with advanced NSCLC and low-abundance EGFR mutations, first-line treatment with EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS. The combination therapy increased the incidence of adverse reactions, but all adverse reactions were expected and tolerated.

Osimertinib in patients with T790M mutation-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Long-term follow-up from a pooled analysis of 2 phase 2 studies

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and T790M (threonine-to-methionine substitution at codon 790)-resistance mutations. The authors present long-term follow-up data from a preplanned, pooled analysis of phase 2 studies, the AZD9291 First Time in Patients Ascending Dose Study (AURA) extension trial (clincialtrials.gov identifier NCT01802632) and the AURA2 trial (NCT02094261).

METHODS

Patients with centrally confirmed, T790M mutation-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer received osimertinib 80 mg once daily until disease progression or study discontinuation. Response was assessed by a blinded, independent, central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

In total, 411 patients received osimertinib (second line, 129 patients; third line or later, 282 patients). At the data cutoff date of November 1, 2016, the median treatment exposure was 16.4 months (range, 0-29.7 months), the objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-70%), the median response duration was 12.3 months (95% CI, 11.1-13.8 months), and the median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.3 months). At the data cutoff date of May 1, 2018, 271 patients (66%) had died, and 140 patients (34%) had discontinued before death. The median overall survival was 26.8 months (95% CI, 24.0-29.1 months); and the 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month survival rates were 80%, 55%, and 37%, respectively. Grade ≥3 possibly causally related (investigator assessed) adverse events were reported in 65 patients (16%), and the most common were rash (grouped terms; 42%; grade ≥3, 1%) and diarrhea (39%; <1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis represents the most mature clinical trial data for osimertinib in patients with pretreated, T790M-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, further establishing osimertinib as a standard of care for this patient population.

Efficacy and safety analysis of the German expanded access program of osimertinib in patients with advanced, T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Osimertinib, a third-generation irreversible mutant-selective inhibitor of EGFR kinase activity was clinically evaluated in the AURA trials, where it showed high clinical efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile in patients with acquired exon 20-EGFR pT790M mutation. We provide the clinical data of the German expanded access program that further characterizes the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a heterogeneous patient population outside clinical trials.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective data analysis on patients who were included into the German osimertinib EAP.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients enrolled, 51 patients (62.9%) with sufficient case report form data were available for efficacy and safety analysis. Unconfirmed overall response rate was 80.0% with 2 patients (3.9%) achieving a complete remission and 37 patients (72.5%) having a partial remission. Disease control rate was 95.9% and only two patients showed refractory disease. Disease control rate did not correlate with clinical characteristics and was independent of number as well as type of the previous therapy line(s). Estimated progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI 9.2-11.0 months). Osimertinib showed a favorable toxicity profile with no dose reductions in our observation period, even in patients with low performance status. Median survival from first diagnosis to data cut-off was 47.3 months (95% CI 43.3-51.9 months). Repeated tissue/liquid biopsy of three patients in our cohort who showed disease progression revealed an amplification of MET.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm safety and efficacy of osimertinib with high response rates among all subgroups, including patients with poor performance status and multiple prior therapy lines. Amplification of MET might mediate acquired resistance to osimertinib.

Afatinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin for first-line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations: subgroup analysis of the LUX-Lung 6 trial

Introduction

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China. Four epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors – afatinib, erlotinib, icotinib, and gefitinib – are available for first-line treatment of NSCLC in China; however, there are few data to guide treatment choice. The Phase III LUX-Lung 6 trial compared afatinib with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of patients from Southeast Asia with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. This post hoc analysis assessed the findings from LUX-Lung 6 in Chinese patients.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01121393.

Materials and methods

Previously untreated patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were randomized 2:1 to receive afatinib or ≤6 cycles of gemcitabine/ cisplatin. The key outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS; primary), objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival (OS), duration of response and disease control, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients from mainland China were treated (89.8% of overall LUX-Lung 6 population; afatinib 217, gemcitabine/cisplatin 110).

Results

PFS was significantly longer with afatinib than gemcitabine/cisplatin (median 11.0 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.30 [95% CI, 0.21, 0.43]; P,0.0001). Overall, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment arms; however, in a subgroup analysis, afatinib significantly improved OS versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with an EGFR Del19 mutation (median 31.6 versus 16.3 months; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.41, 0.91]; P=0.0146). Afatinib was well tolerated, with most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) being of grade 1 or 2 severity. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs with afatinib were rash/acne (15.9%/0.5%), stomatitis (6.1%/0%), and diarrhea (5.6%/0%). TRAEs leading to permanent discontinuation were reported in 12 patients (5.6%) receiving afatinib and 43 (41.7%) receiving gemcitabine/cisplatin. Afatinib significantly improved PFS compared with standard first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and demonstrated a manageable safety profile.

Conclusion

The findings support the rationale for using afatinib as a first-line treatment option for this patient population.

Erlotinib versus gefitinib for brain metastases in Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of Erlotinib versus Gefitinib in the treatment of Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Methods

Consecutive Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed brain metastases were identified and initially received peroral administration of 150 mg/d erlotinib or 250 mg/d gefitinib during 2009–2015. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the second endpoint.

Results

The cohort consisted of 227 Asian patients (erlotinib-treated cohort: n = 112, mean age = 58.5 years [SD: 20.13]; gefitinib-treated cohort: n = 115, mean age = 58.4 years [SD: 19.52]). In a multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex and time span of smoking history, significant difference was detected in the 36-month OS between erlotinib and gefitinib groups (58.3% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.012). There was also significant difference in the 36-month PFS between erlotinib and gefitinib groups (64% vs. 53%, p = 0.013).

Conclusion

For Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases, erlotinib was associated with a significantly longer OS and a more prolonged PFS and compared with gefitinib.

Activity of EGFR TKIs in Caucasian Patients With NSCLC Harboring Potentially Sensitive Uncommon EGFR Mutations

BACKGROUND

Molecular characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), defined predictive and druggable mutations that greatly modified patient prognoses. The most frequent driver mutations detected in NSCLC are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, accounting for approximately 90% of exon 19 deletions and exon 21 point mutations. The other EGFR mutations are classified as uncommon or nonclassical and include exon 18 point mutations, exon 20 insertions, and combined mutations, which present different sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected data from EGFR TKI-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC, harboring EGFR exon 18 mutations and EGFR combined mutations treated with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Efficacy end points were evaluated considering the activity of EGFR TKIs in exon 18 versus double-mutation EGFR groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were evaluated in our analysis, and subdivided into 2 group: complex mutations (cohort A = 46 patients) and double mutations in exon 18 (cohort B = 42 patients). The results showed a median progression-free survival of 8.3 versus 12.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; P = .06) and a median overall survival of 17.0 versus 31.0 months (HR, 0.62, P = .04) favoring the EGFR combination group. Within the combination group, no detrimental effect was associated with exon 20 mutations.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that EGFR exon 18 and combination mutations might be considered potentially sensitive uncommon mutations, with a similar survival compared with the well known common EGFR mutations. Comparative analysis showed that patients with complex mutations achieved longer survival compared with the exon 18 group, without correlation with the presence of exon 20 mutations.

EGFR Mutation Testing: Changing Patterns of Molecular Testing in Brazil

BACKGROUND

In Brazil, cancer is the second most common cause of death. Most patients in resource-limited countries are diagnosed in advanced stages. Current guidelines advocate for EGFR mutation testing in all patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are recommended in patients with advanced or metastatic disease harboring sensitizing mutations. In Brazil, there are limited data regarding the frequency of EGFR testing and the changes in patterns of testing overtime.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective study. We obtained deidentified data from a commercial database, which included 11,684 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated between 2011 and 2016 in both public and private settings. We analyzed the frequency of EGFR mutation testing over time. We also directly studied 3,664 tumor samples, which were analyzed between 2011 and 2013. These samples were tested for EGFR mutations through an access program to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Brazil.

RESULTS

Overall, 38% of patients were tested for EGFR mutations; 76% of them were seen in the private sector, and 24% were seen in the public center. The frequency of testing for EGFR mutations increased significantly over time: 13% (287/2,228 patients) in 2011, 34% (738/2,142) in 2012, 39% (822/2,092) in 2013, 44% (866/1,972) in 2014, 53% (1,165/2,184) in 2015, and 42% (1,359/3,226) in 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 25.5% of analyzed samples (857/3,364). Deletions in Exon 19 were the most frequent mutations, detected in 54% of patients (463/857).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the frequency of EGFR mutation in this cohort was lower than that found in Asia but higher than in North American and Western European populations. The most commonly found mutations were in Exon 19 and Exon 21. Our study shows that fewer than half of patients are being tested and that the disparity is greater in the public sector.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

These data not only indicate the shortage of testing but also show that the rates of positivity in those tested seem to be higher than in other cohorts for which data have been published. This study further supports the idea that awareness and access to testing should be improved in order to improve survival rates in lung cancer in Brazil.

Tumor clonality and resistance mechanisms in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for therapeutic sequencing

While the development of EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, acquired resistance to therapy is inevitable, reflecting tumor evolution. Recent studies show that EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer is highly heterogeneous at the cellular level, facilitating clonal expansion of resistant tumors via multiple molecular mechanisms. Here, we review the mechanistic differences between first-, second- and third-generation EGFR-targeted TKIs and speculate how these features could explain differences in clinical activity between these agents from a clonal evolution perspective. We hypothesize that the molecular dissection of tumor resistance mechanisms will facilitate optimal sequential use of EGFR TKIs in individual patients, thus maximizing the duration of chemotherapy-free treatment and survival benefit.

Inhibition of NF-κB improves sensitivity to irradiation and EGFR-TKIs and decreases irradiation-induced lung toxicity

Resistance to radiotherapy and to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), as well as therapy-related lung toxicity, are serious problems in the treatment of lung cancer. NF-κB has been reported to be associated with radioresistance. Therefore, we evaluated its effects on sensitivity to irradiation and to EGFR-TKIs; irradiation-induced lung toxicity; and the effects of irradiation on sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. We used IKKβ inhibitor IMD 0354 or p65 depletion to explore their effects on sensitivity to irradiation and to EGFR-TKIs in vitro and in vivo. We evaluated the efficacy of IMD 0354 in a radiation-induced pulmonary-fibrosis mouse model. Irradiation enhanced activation and expression of MET and therefore suppressed the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to irradiation or EGFR-TKIs. Inhibition of NF-κB by IMD 0354 or by p65 depletion reversed irradiation-induced MET activation and increased the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to irradiation, to EGFR-TKIs and to the combination thereof in vitro and in vivo. In addition, IMD 0354 significantly reduced lung toxicity in a murine model of irradiation-induced pneumonia and lung fibrosis. These findings indicated that NF-κB inhibition can improve sensitivity to irradiation and to EGFR-TKIs and can decrease irradiation-induced lung toxicity in lung cancer.

Does EGFR Mutation Type Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer? Analysis of Two Large, Phase III Studies Comparing Afatinib with Chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6)

INTRODUCTION

In LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (Del19/L858R) and significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations. Patient-reported outcomes stratified by EGFR mutation type are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Lung cancer symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) were assessed every 21 days until progression using the EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire C30 and its lung cancer-specific module, LC13. Analyses of cough, dyspnea, and pain were prespecified and included analysis of percentage of patients who improved on therapy, time to deterioration of symptoms, and change over time. Global health status (GHS)/QoL was also assessed. Analyses were conducted for all patients with tumors harboring Del19 or L858R mutations and were exploratory.

RESULTS

Compared with chemotherapy, afatinib more commonly improved symptoms of, delayed time to deterioration for, and was associated with better mean scores over time for cough and dyspnea in patients with Del19 or L858R mutations. All three prespecified analyses of pain showed a trend favoring afatinib over chemotherapy. In both Del19 and L858R mutations, afatinib was also associated with improvements in GHS/QoL. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated statistically significant improvements in GHS/QoL for afatinib over chemotherapy for patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations or L858R mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

These exploratory analyses suggest first-line afatinib improved lung cancer-related symptoms and GHS/QoL compared with chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with tumors harboring common EGFR mutations, with benefits in both Del19 and L858R patients. When considered with OS (Del19 patients only) and PFS benefits, these findings substantiate the value of using afatinib over chemotherapy in these patient groups.

Identification of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinoma using dual-energy spectral computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To explore the role of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DESCT) quantitative characteristics for the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in a cohort of East Asian patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent both DESCT chest examination and EGFR test were retrospectively selected from our institution's database. The DESCT visual morphological features and quantitative parameters, including the CT number at 70 keV, normalized iodine concentration (NIC), normalized water concentration, and slopes of the spectral attenuation curves (slope λ HU [Hounsfield unit]), were evaluated or calculated. The patients were divided into two groups: the EGFR mutation group and EGFR wild-type group. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the DESCT quantitative parameters for diagnosis of EGFR mutation status.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were detected in 66 (55.0%) of the 120 enrolled patients. The univariate analysis revealed that sex, smoking history, CT texture, NIC, and slope λ HU were significantly associated with EGFR mutation status (p = 0.037, 0.001, 0.047, 0.010, and 0.018, respectively). The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that smoking history (odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, p = 0.005) and NIC (OR = 58.026, p = 0.049) were the two significant predictive factors associated with EGFR mutations. Based on this analysis, the smoking history and NIC were combined to determine the predictive value for EGFR mutations with the area under the curve of 0.702.

CONCLUSIONS

NIC may be a potential quantitative DESCT parameter for predicting EGFR mutations in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

KEY POINTS

• DESCT can provide multiple quantitative image parameters compared to conventional CT. • Identification of the radio-genomic relation between DESCT and EGFR status can help to define molecular subcategories of lung adenocarcinoma, which is valuable for personalized clinical targeted therapy. • NIC may be a potential DESCT quantitative parameter for predicting EGFR mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

A phase II study of afatinib treatment for elderly patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of afatinib in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed the clinical effects of afatinib as a first-line treatment for elderly (age ≥70 years) NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation). All patients were initially administered afatinib (30 mg/day).

RESULTS

Between May 2014 and August 2017, 40 patients (13 men, 27 women) with adenocarcinoma were included in our analysis. The median age was 77 years (range, 70-85 years). The dose was reduced in 19 patients. The objective overall response and disease control rates were 72.5% and 100%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.9 months and not reached, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea, rash/acne, and anemia. Major grade 3 or higher toxicities included diarrhea (12.5%), mucositis (7.5%), and pneumonitis (7.5%). Afatinib treatment was discontinued in 8 patients owing to AEs of elevated amylase (n = 1), liver dysfunction (n = 1), rash/acne (n = 1), nail change (n = 1), anorexia (n = 2), pneumonitis (n = 2), and diarrhea (n = 2). Two patients died due to treatment-related pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that verified the efficacy and feasibility of first-line chemotherapy with afatinib at 30 mg/day in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. First-line afatinib of 30 mg/day could be a treatment option in this patient population.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor versus Physician Choice Chemotherapy in Second-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Post hoc Analysis of Randomized Control Trial

Background: There is a paucity of prospective data for patients who progressed after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or pemetrexed doublet among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of second-line therapy in patients who progressed on TKI or pemetrexed doublet in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Objective: The objective of the study was to calculate response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving second-line therapy in EGFR mutation NSCLC. Materials and Methods: Post hoc analysis of second-line therapy among patients enrolled in randomized control trial comparing TKI versus pemetrexed doublet in EGFR mutation NSCLC. Kaplan–Meir statistics were used for PFS and OS. Impact of variables was measured with Log-rank test. Results: One hundred and eighty-seven patients who progressed on first-line therapy and received second-line agents were analyzed. Male:female: 110 (56.3%):77 (41.2%). One hundred and thirteen patients received gefitinib, while 74 received chemotherapy. Response rate (complete response + partial response) was 53% versus 24% in gefitinib versus chemotherapy group (RECIST v1.1). PFS was 7.4 months versus 4.4 months (P = 0.001), while OS was 14 months versus 9.7 months (P = 0.007), in gefitinib versus chemotherapy group, respectively. Response to TKI significantly improves PFS (10.8 months vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.001) and OS (21.4 months vs. 8.9 months, P = 0.03). Rash, pruritus, dry skin, fatigue, diarrhea, and paronychia were common toxicities of TKI. Conclusion: Second-line TKI improves outcome in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Response to therapy, whether with TKI or chemotherapy, favorably impacts outcomes.

Incomplete uptake of EGFR mutation testing and its impact on estimation of mutation prevalence in patients with non-squamous NSCLC: A population-based study in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is recommended for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not all eligible patients get tested, which may bias the mutation prevalence estimated. This study aims to examine trends in the uptake of EGFR mutation testing in patients with non-squamous NSCLC in New Zealand; to develop a composite metric that quantifies the influences of demographic and clinico-pathological factors on the testing uptake; and to estimate the prevalence of EGFR mutation if all patients were tested.

METHODS

This population-based study involved all patients who were diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC in four health regions in New Zealand between January 2010 and December 2015. Eligible patients were identified from the New Zealand Cancer Registry and information on EGFR mutation testing was obtained through linkage to TestSafe, a clinical information sharing service, and laboratory records.

RESULTS

Of 2701 eligible patients, 1059 (39.2%) were tested for EGFR mutation. The testing prevalence increased (3.7% in 2010 to 64.6% in 2014) and the influences of demographic and clinic-pathological factors decreased from 2010 to June 2014, and remained stable afterward. Of the tested patients, 229 (21.6%) were mutation positive with a decreasing trend observed from 2010 (43.8%) to June 2014 (16.8%). The best-fit log-linear model estimated the prevalence of EGFR mutation, if all patients were tested, as 15.5% (95% CI: 13.2%-18.0%).

CONCLUSION

The methods described here allowed a more accurate estimation of the prevalence of EGFR mutation.

Landscape of EGFR-Dependent and -Independent Resistance Mechanisms to Osimertinib and Continuation Therapy Beyond Progression in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

PURPOSE

Osimertinib was initially approved for T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, more recently, for first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, resistance mechanisms to osimertinib have been incompletely described.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using cohorts from The University of Texas MD Anderson Lung Cancer Moonshot GEMINI and Moffitt Cancer Center lung cancer databases, we collected clinical data for patients treated with osimertinib. Molecular profiling analysis was performed at the time of progression in a subset of the patients.

RESULTS

In the 118 patients treated with osimertinib, 42 had molecular profiling at progression. T790M was preserved in 21 (50%) patients and lost in 21 (50%). EGFR C797 and L792 (26%) mutations were the most common resistance mechanism and were observed exclusively in T790M-preserved cases. MET amplification was the second most common alteration (14%). Recurrent alterations were observed in 22 genes/pathways, including PIK3CA, FGFR, and RET. Preclinical studies confirmed MET, PIK3CA, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition as potential resistance drivers. Alterations of cell-cycle genes were associated with shorter median progression-free survival (PFS, 4.4 vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.01). In 76 patients with progression, osimertinib was continued in 47 cases with a median second PFS (PFS2) of 12.6 months; 21 patients received local consolidation radiation with a median PFS of 15.5 months. Continuation of osimertinib beyond progression was associated with a longer overall survival compared with discontinuation (11.2 vs. 6.1 months, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib resistance is associated with diverse, predominantly EGFR-independent genomic alterations. Continuation of osimertinib after progression, alone or in conjunction with radiotherapy, may provide prolonged clinical benefit in selected patients.See related commentary by Devarakonda and Govindan, p. 6112.

New drugs in thoracic oncology: needs and knowledge - an online ERS Lung Cancer Assembly survey

In the last decade, systemic therapy for advanced lung cancer has become diverse, complex and personalised. These new therapies (monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy) have a far different toxicity profile compared to chemotherapy. Furthermore, clinical indications and reimbursement criteria can vary across Europe. The aim of the present online survey was to assess the knowledge, views and challenges facing the European respiratory community in this rapidly changing field. A 15-question web survey was sent to all European Respiratory Society members through the Society's monthly electronic communication. A total of 315 questionnaires were completed. Most of the respondents were male (59.1%), were above 40 years of age (52.9%) and were working in university/academic hospitals (74.8%), the majority as pulmonologists (90%). Only 55% of the participants were aware of the legal processes for drug recognition. Except for epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, up to 38% did not know about the specific toxicities of anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS proto-oncogene 1 TKIs, monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Of the respondents, 92% showed an interest in an online platform reporting new drugs' toxicities. Despite a large amount of publicity and integration of new drugs into therapeutic algorithms and clinical guidelines, physicians taking care of lung cancer patients have a need for up-to-date information on systemic therapy toxicity management and legal constraints.