Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Interim analysis of a Phase 3b study

OBJECTIVES

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that afatinib is a suitable treatment option for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm +) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, such studies often exclude patients treated in routine clinical practice. We report interim results from a Phase 3b, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, exploratory trial, in which afatinib was investigated in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with EGFRm + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve NSCLC received afatinib 40 mg orally, once-daily, until disease progression, or voluntary withdrawal. Primary objective was safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 479 patients received afatinib: median age 65 years, 8 % of patients had an ECOG performance status ≥ 2, 17 % had brain metastases, and 13 % had tumors containing uncommon mutations only. All but one patient (99.8 %) had an adverse event (AE). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs; any/grade ≥ 3) occurred in 97 %/44 % of patients; most common were diarrhea (87 %/16 %) and rash (51 %/11 %). AEs leading to afatinib dose-reduction were reported in 258 patients (54 %), and 37 patients (8 %) discontinued treatment due to a TRAE. Objective response rate was 45.5 %, median duration of response was 14.1 months (95 % CI: 12.2-16.4). Overall median time to symptomatic progression and progression-free survival were 14.9 months (95 % CI: 13.8-17.6) and 13.4 months (95 % CI: 11.8-14.5), respectively, in the overall population and 19.3 months (95 % CI: 15.6-21.8) and 15.9 months (95 % CI: 13.9-19.1) in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions.

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib administration in routine clinical practice was well tolerated with no new safety signals and demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with EGFRm + NSCLC. TRAEs were generally manageable with tolerability-guided dose reductions. Overall, these data independently support findings from randomized controlled trials of afatinib in EGFRm + NSCLC.

Breakthrough in targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains by far the single most common malignancy of lung cancer which causes more and more mortality in recent years. NSCLC accounts for more than 80 % of lung cancers, and the vast majority of patients were found to be in advanced inoperable stages. Chemotherapy used to be the main treatment for NSCLC, but due to its obvious side effects. Chemotherapy gradually withdrew from the stage of history. In recent years, cellular and molecular biotechnology has developed rapidly, and researchers have begun to target key genes and regulatory molecules for treatment. Targeted drugs have also emerged. The purpose of this review is to introduce important research achievements in recent years and the treatment progress of new drugs.

Network meta analysis of first-line therapy for advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated overall survival

Aim: To update overall survival (OS) results from a previous network meta analysis comparing the relative clinical efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) for EGFR mutation positive (EGFR+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials & methods: A Bayesian network meta analysis was conducted using updated/mature randomized controlled trial OS results in response to first-line EGFR TKI therapies. Results: Dacomitinib showed a numerical improvement of OS relative to other EGFR TKIs: afatinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.61-1.24), erlotinib (HR: 0.79; 95% CrI: 0.44-1.42), gefitinib (HR: 0.75; 95% CrI: 0.59-0.95) and osimertinib (HR: 0.94; 95% CrI: 0.68-1.29). Conclusion: Dacomitinib should be considered as a first-line treatment option for patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR+ NSCLC.

Structure-based design of some quinazoline derivatives as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Background

The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for the treatment of lung cancer, most especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), was one of the major challenges encountered by the medicinal chemist in the world. The treatment of EGFR tyrosine kinase to manage NSCLCs becomes an urgent therapeutic necessity. NSCLC was the foremost cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Therefore, there is a need to develop more EGFR inhibitors due to the development of drug resistance by the mutation. This research is aimed at designing new EGFR inhibitors using a structure-based design approach. Structure-based drug design comprises several steps such as protein structure retrieval and preparation, ligand library preparation, docking, and structural modification on the best hit compound to design new ones.

Result

Molecular docking virtual screening on fifty sets of quinazoline derivatives/epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors against their target protein (EGFR tyrosine kinase receptor PDB entry: 3IKA) and pharmacokinetic profile predictions were performed to identify hit compounds with promising affinities toward their target and good pharmacokinetic profiles. The hit compounds identified were compound 6 with a binding affinity of − 9.3 kcal/mol, compounds 5 and 8, each with a binding affinity of − 9.1 kcal/mol, respectively. The three hit compounds bound to EGFR tyrosine kinase receptor via four different types of interactions which include conventional hydrogen bond, carbon-hydrogen bond, electrostatic, and hydrophobic interactions, respectively. The best hit (compound 6) among the 3 hit compounds was retained as a template and used to design sixteen new EGFR inhibitors. The sixteen newly designed compounds were also docked into the active site of EGFR tyrosine kinase receptor to study their mode of interactions with the receptor. The binding affinities of these newly designed compounds range from − 9.5 kcal/mol to − 10.2 kcal/mol. The pharmacokinetic profile predictions of these newly designed compounds were further examined and found to be orally bioavailable with good absorption, low toxicity level, and permeable properties.

Conclusion

The sixteen newly designed EGFR inhibitors were found to have better binding affinities than the template used in the designing process and afatinib the positive control (an FDA approved EGFR inhibitor). None of these designed compounds was found to violate more than the permissible limit set by RO5. More so, the newly designed compounds were found to have good synthetic accessibility which indicates that these newly designed compounds can be easily synthesized in the laboratory.

Advances in Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Targeted Therapy

The treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is constantly evolving. Although the advent of immunotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of patients with NSCLC, the identification of driver mutations and the subsequent specific treatment of these targets often lead to durable responses while maintaining quality of life. This review delves into targeted therapies available for epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS1, neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase, and BRAF- mutated NSCLC patients, as well as other mutations with promising novel drugs under clinical investigation.

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: treatment paradigm, current evidence, and challenges

Therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been shown to have superior outcomes when compared to chemotherapy. First-generation EGFR TKI, including gefitinib and erlotinib, and second-generation EGFR TKI, including afatinib and dacomitinib, proved to be effective in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutation. Later, resistance mutations were identified. Consequently, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, was studied and demonstrated activity against EGFR-sensitizing and resistant mutations. Osimertinib moved recently to the first-line setting with the positive results of the FLAURA (AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer) trial. The use of these drugs is limited by their cost and availability mainly in middle- to low-income countries.

Hypothesis generative head-to-head study comparing efficacy of afatinib and osimertinib based on immunological biomarkers in Japanese NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (Heat on Beat study)

Background:

In the FLAURA trial, superiority of osimertinib over the standard of care (SOC) was not demonstrated in Asian patients; SOC seemed favorable among Japanese patients (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.82–2.33). Three reasons are suggested: since rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is covered by health insurance in Japan, EGFR-TKI rechallenge rate was higher in SOC than in the osimertinib group, which resulted in a long-term sequential administration of EGFR-TKIs; treatment discontinuation rate was high in the osimertinib group due to adverse events such as interstitial pneumonia among Japanese patients. EGFR-TKIs enhance tumor antigen-specific cytotoxicity of T cells, especially first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, which are more active against various cells with wild-type EGFR, including regulatory T cells. Consequently, subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy seemed more promising in the SOC group. Therefore, optimal first-line EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutant advanced lung cancer may not have been identified in Japanese patients.

Methods:

The Heat on Beat study is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study to compare OS between initial treatment with afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Exploration of immunomonitoring through peripheral blood mononuclear cells will also be performed, before, during, and after treatment. Treatment-naïve EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (N = 100) will be randomized to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The co-primary endpoints are 3-year survival rate and characterization of immune environment associated with response to afatinib, osimertinib, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Enrollment will start in May 2020 at 28 sites in Japan and continue for 1 year, with 3-year follow-up.

Discussion:

Because there is no clinical trial comparing second- with third-generation EGFR-TKI for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, our study would provide a major impact on clinical practice.

Trial registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190221, registered date: 25 February 2020, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031190221

Long-term response to second-line afatinib treatment for advanced squamous cell carcinoma non-small cell lung cancer: a rare case report

The ErbB family is composed of four cell membrane receptors: ErbB-1 (epidermal growth factor receptor or human epidermal growth factor receptor [HER]1), ErbB-2 (HER2), ErbB-3 (HER3), and ErbB-4 (HER4). All members of the ErbB family play a critical role in regulating cell growth, proliferation and migration of tumours. Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family inhibitor that is approved for second-line treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) that has progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we describe the case of a 56-year-old male Chinese patient with SqCC who had previously failed chemotherapy and radiotherapy and was subsequently enrolled in the LUX-Lung 8 study. The patient responded well to treatment with afatinib (40 mg/day). His disease stabilised after 8 weeks and a complete response was achieved after 12 weeks of treatment. Follow-up of this patient is ongoing; he is still alive and has not experienced disease progression in the 7 years since initiation of afatinib. The long-term response and prolonged survival in this patient provide additional evidence for second-line treatment with afatinib in patients with SqCC.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for solid tumors in the past 20 years (2001-2020)

Tyrosine kinases are implicated in tumorigenesis and progression, and have emerged as major targets for drug discovery. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inhibit corresponding kinases from phosphorylating tyrosine residues of their substrates and then block the activation of downstream signaling pathways. Over the past 20 years, multiple robust and well-tolerated TKIs with single or multiple targets including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, HER2, NTRK, VEGFR, RET, MET, MEK, FGFR, PDGFR, and KIT have been developed, contributing to the realization of precision cancer medicine based on individual patient's genetic alteration features. TKIs have dramatically improved patients' survival and quality of life, and shifted treatment paradigm of various solid tumors. In this article, we summarized the developing history of TKIs for treatment of solid tumors, aiming to provide up-to-date evidence for clinical decision-making and insight for future studies.

Optimizing therapy sequence to prevent patient attrition in EGFR mutation-positive advanced or metastatic NSCLC

Clinical trial and real-world data in non-small-cell lung cancer indicate that 10-60% of patients that progressed on first- or second-generation EGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) do not receive systemic second-line therapy. In our article, we discuss efficacy, safety and treatment duration with different EGFR-TKIs and stress the need for delivery of the most efficacious therapy in the first-line. We also provide our perspective on analysis of circulating tumor DNA and the role of EGFR-TKI in combined therapies. Finally, we review new therapeutic options to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKI. We believe that overall treatment duration and access to different medications in subsequent lines of therapy should be considered when planning the optimal treatment strategy.

A Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Literature for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Toxicity

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are common amongst those with non-small cell lung cancer and represent a major factor in treatment decisions, most notably in the advanced stages. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target the EGFR, such as erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib and osimertinib, have all shown to be effective in this setting. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, is a favorable option, but almost all patients develop resistance at some time point. There are no effective treatment options for patients who progress on osimertinib, but ongoing trials will hopefully address this unmet need. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of the data with EGFR TKIs, management of the toxicities and the ongoing trials with this class of agents.

Alflutinib (AST2818), primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, is a potent CYP3A4 inducer

Alflutinib (AST2818) is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor that inhibits both EGFR-sensitive mutations and T790M mutations. Previous study has shown that after multiple dosages, alflutinib exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics and displays a time- and dose-dependent increase in the apparent clearance, probably due to its self-induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme. In this study, we investigated the CYP isozymes involved in the metabolism of alflutinib and evaluated the enzyme inhibition and induction potential of alflutinib and its metabolites. The data showed that alflutinib in human liver microsomes (HLMs) was metabolized mainly by CYP3A4, which could catalyze the formation of AST5902. Alflutinib did not inhibit CYP isozymes in HLMs but could induce CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes. Rifampin is a known strong CYP3A4 inducer and is recommended by the FDA as a positive control in the CYP3A4 induction assay. We found that the induction potential of alflutinib was comparable to that of rifampin. The Emax of CYP3A4 induction by alflutinib in three lots of human hepatocytes were 9.24-, 11.2-, and 10.4-fold, while the fold-induction of rifampin (10 μM) were 7.22-, 19.4- and 9.46-fold, respectively. The EC50 of alflutinib-induced CYP3A4 mRNA expression was 0.25 μM, which was similar to that of rifampin. In addition, AST5902 exhibited much weak CYP3A4 induction potential compared to alflutinib. Given the plasma exposure of alflutinib and AST5902, both are likely to affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 substrates. Considering that alflutinib is a CYP3A4 substrate and a potent CYP3A4 inducer, drug-drug interactions are expected during alflutinib treatment.

[Clinical Value of Droplet Digital PCR and Super-ARMS Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation in Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma]

BACKGROUND

The patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma should select targeted drugs based on the type of tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. However, it is difficult to collect tumor tissue of advanced lung adenocarcinoma, and some experts agree that peripheral blood can be used as a substitute for tumor tissue as a test specimen. This paper aimed to investigate the clinical value of ddPCR and super-amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in detecting EGFR gene mutation in peripheral blood of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients diagnosed in Beijing Chest Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from February 2016 to February 2019 were collected, and the sensitivity and specificity of plasma ctDNA EGFR gene mutation detected by ddPCR and super-arms were compared. Some patients with positive EGFR gene mutations received oral treatment with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). The patients were divided into subgroups according to the test results. In group 1, both ddPCR and super-arms showed positive EGFR gene mutation results, with 21 cases. In group 2, ddPCR and super-arms detection of EGFR gene mutation were all negative, with 16 cases. In group 3, the ddPCR test was positive and the super-arms test was negative, with 5 cases. In group 4, the ddPCR test result was negative while the super-arms test result was positive. Since the number of patients in group 4 was 0, no statistics were included. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluate the short-term outcome, and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared with survival analysis to evaluate the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were detected in 58 (48.7%) of 119 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The coincidence rate between ddPCR and EGFR gene mutation in tumor tissues was 82.4% (Kappa=0.647, P<0.001), the sensitivity was 74.1%, and the specificity was 90.2%. However, the coincidence degree of super-arms test and tissue test was 71.4%, the sensitivity was only 58.6%, and the specificity was 83.6%. The ORR and DCR values in group 3 were lower than those in group 1 and 2, but there was no significant difference in ORR between groups (P>0.05). Survival analysis showed that the PFS of the three groups was compared. The difference was not statistically significant (χ²=2.221, P=0.329).

CONCLUSIONS

ddPCR, as a high sensitivity and specificity liquid gene detection method, can be used as a reliable method to detect the mutation of plasma ctDNA EGFR gene in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The results of plasma genetic testing can also be used as the basis for predicting the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients.

Afatinib for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in China: a review of clinical data

Mutations in the EGFR gene are particularly prevalent among Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Six EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung carcinoma in China, which poses questions about which agent is most suitable for a particular patient. In this article, we review available clinical trial and real-world data with afatinib in Chinese patients. We assess its efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups such as those with uncommon mutations or brain metastases. We also consider possible subsequent therapies following afatinib. Encouragingly, available data suggest that sequential afatinib and osimertinib confer prolonged overall time to failure of almost 4 years in Asian patients, and represents a viable option in this setting.

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: final analysis of the GioTag study

Aim: Final overall survival (OS) and time on treatment analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib. Patients & methods: Patients (n = 203) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months before data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment; OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median time on treatment with afatinib and osimertinib was 27.7 months (90% CI: 26.7-29.9). Median OS was 37.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-41.3); median OS was 41.6 and 44.8 months in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients, respectively. Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Computational virtual screening and structure-based design of some epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Background

The foremost cause of cancer mortality worldwide was lung cancer. Lung cancer is divided into small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The latter is the main type of lung cancer that account for about 90% of the cancer issues and estimate about 25% of the cancer mortality each year in the world. Among the types of lung cancer with about 1.5 million patients and less than 20% survival rate is NSCLC. Overexpression of EGFR tyrosine kinase was recognized to be the cause of NSCLC. Therefore, there is a need to develop more EGFR inhibitors due to drug-resistance development by the mutation.

Result

Computational virtual screening on some epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRL858R/T790M inhibitors or NSCLC therapeutic agents) against their target protein (EGFR tyrosine kinase receptor pdb entry 3IKA) was performed via molecular docking simulation and pharmacokinetics to identify hit compounds with a promising affinity toward their target. The hit compounds discovered were compound 22 with −9.8 kcal/mol, 24 with −9.7 kcal/mol, 17 with −9.7 kcal/mol, and 19 with −9.5 kcal/mol respectively. These lead compounds were further subjected to drug-likeness and ADME prediction and found to be orally bioavailable. Six (6) new EGFRL858R/T790M inhibitors using compound 22 with the highest binding affinity as a template were designed.

Conclusion

The six newly EGFRL858R/T790M inhibitors were found to have a better binding affinity than the template used in the designing process and AZD9291 (the positive control). None of the designed compounds was found to violate more than the permissible limit set by RO5 thereby predicting their easy transportation, absorption, and diffusion. More so, the designed compounds were found to have good synthetic accessibility which indicates that these designed compounds can be easily synthesized in the laboratory.

The effectiveness of afatinib in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring complex epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

Background and aims:

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are effective against classical EGFR mutations in lung cancer. However, their effectiveness and the prognosis of lung cancer patients with complex EGFR mutations are not well delineated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of different EGFR TKIs in patients with complex EGFR mutations.

Patients and methods:

From 2005 to 2020, we collected lung adenocarcinoma tissue samples for EGFR mutation analysis using direct Sanger sequencing. Patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR TKIs as first-line treatment were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, EGFR mutation status, treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results:

Among 2675 patients with EGFR mutations, 239 (8.9%) had complex EGFR mutations, of whom 125 received EGFR TKI treatment as first-line treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that afatinib was a more favorable factor for PFS than gefitinib [hazard ratio (HR), 2.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11–3.62] and erlotinib (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.31–5.22), especially in patients with uncommon mutation patterns. Afatinib treatment as first-line treatment was also associated with longer OS compared with erlotinib (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.20–5.12). Classical mutation pattern was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.020). Secondary T790M was detected in 22 of 52 (42.3%) patients who had re-biopsied tissue samples after acquiring resistance to EGFR TKIs. There was no significant difference in secondary T790M formation after acquired resistance to the three EGFR TKIs (p = 0.261). Furthermore, three (5.8%) patients had small-cell lung cancer transformation.

Conclusion:

Afatinib is an effective first-line treatment for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring complex EGFR mutations, especially those with uncommon mutation patterns.

Making the case for EGFR TKI sequencing in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: a GioTag study US patient analysis

Aim: To assess time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in US patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib-osimertinib treatment in the global, observational GioTag study. Patients & methods: Patients had EGFR T790M mutation-positive disease after first-line afatinib and subsequently received osimertinib. The primary outcome was TTF. Results: In 129 patients at US centers, median TTF was 28.4 months (90% CI: 27.0-34.1). Median overall survival was 47.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-51.5). Conclusion: Sequential afatinib-osimertinib in this US-treated population was associated with long median TTF and represents an effective, evidence-based treatment option for US patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC not presenting with active brain metastases or de novo T790M. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Propensity score analysis of overall survival between first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs using real-world data

We constructed a data set of EGFR‐mutant non–small‐cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, and compared the overall survival of first‐generation (1G), and second‐generation (2G) EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical practice using a propensity score. We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients who received EGFR‐TKI therapy between January 2008 and August 2017 at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When comparing OS between 1G and 2G EGFR‐TKIs, propensity score analyses were performed using 2 methods: matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). (Clinical Trial information: UMIN000030121) In total, 1400 patients from 11 institutions were enrolled in this study, and the data from the 1366 patients who received only EGFR‐TKI therapy were analyzed (gefitinib [GEF], N = 732; erlotinib [ERL], N = 416; afatinib, N = 218). Median OS times (months [95%CI]) were 29.7 [27.5‐33.5] in the 1G group (gefitinib, 32.0 [28.1‐35.8]; erlotinib, 27.5 [23.9‐31.7]), and 38.6 [32.2‐NR] in the 2G group (afatinib), respectively. The trend of longer OS for afatinib against 1G EGFR‐TKIs remained, even after adjusted by propensity score. (unadjusted, hazard ratio [HR] 0.676, P = .0023; adjusted by IPTW, HR 0.685 P < .0001; adjusted by matching, HR 0.725, P = .0418). Exploratory analysis showed that OS using the 2G EGFR‐TKI was superior to that of the 1G EGFR‐TKIs, suggesting the potential of sequential therapy of 2G EGFR‐TKI followed by osimertinib. (HR 0.419, P = .0519) Real‐world data analysis using 1354 data records, using propensity scoring, indicated that 2G EGFR‐TKI had a trend of longer OS compared with 1G EGFR‐TKIs.

Post-Progression Survival in Secondary EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With and Without Osimertinib After Failure of a Previous EGFR TKI

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation, the most common resistance mechanism to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate survival outcome of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who have progressed on previous EGFR TKI therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation after acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKI who received tumor rebiopsy after EGFR TKI failure from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017 were reviewed. Patient clinical characteristics, T790M mutation status, and post-progression survival (PPS) were recorded by chart review.

RESULTS

We included 240 patients and the percentage of secondary T790M mutations in first time tissue rebiopsy was 52.9%. 38 of the initial T790M-negative patients received second rebiopsies and 14 (36.8%) of these were T790M positive. The duration between first and second rebiopsy tended to be longer in patients who had T790M mutation in the second biopsy (11.5 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.043). After EGFR TKI failure, the median PPS of patients who had the T790M mutation and history of osimertinib use was 42.6 months (95% CI 34.6-50.5), compared to 18.0 (95% CI 9.6-26.4) months in T790M-positive patients without a history of osimertinib use, and 18.8 (95% CI 9.3-28.4) months in patients with no T790M mutation (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that history of osimertinib use was correlated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data further emphasize that osimertinib should be a standard of care in patients with pretreated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC.

EGFR mutation genotypes affect efficacy and resistance mechanisms of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC patients

Background

Osimertinib is a potent third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with T790M resistance mutation. However, a broad interpatient variability was observed. This study aimed to evaluate whether EGFR-mutant genotypes affect the clinical outcomes and resistance mechanisms in T790M-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib therapy.

Methods

All NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib in our institute were screened. We included those with known EGFR-mutant genotypes and T790M positivity. Clinical outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were evaluated and compared between different EGFR genotypes. Patients with next-generation sequencing testing or tumor rebiopsy after osimertinib treatment were analyzed for resistance mechanisms.

Results

ORR, CBR, PFS, and OS were all non-significantly different among patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion (19Del, n=136), L858R (n=93), and uncommon mutations (n=6). However, a subset of tumors with deletion starting at E746 (ΔE746, n=98), but not non-ΔE746 tumors (n=38), had better clinical outcomes than L858R tumors (n=93). Frequencies of T790M loss and C797S acquisition after osimertinib treatment were similar between 19Del (n=56) and L858R tumors (n=33). However, compared with L858R tumors (n=33), those with 19Del ΔE746 subtype (n=40) had a higher whereas non-ΔE746 subtype (n=16) had a similar frequency of acquired C797S mutation. Combined analysis of our cohort and public cohort confirmed these findings.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the EGFR 19Del subtypes affect the clinical outcomes and resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in T790M-positive patients. Identifying patients with relatively worse treatment outcomes may be informative for establishing new therapies for these patients.

Phase II Study of Low-Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601)

LESSONS LEARNED

Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC achieved long-time to treatment failure with fewer treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety.

BACKGROUND

Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug-related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated.

METHODS

Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1-year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3-66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1-21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy.

Non-small cell lung cancer patients with ex19del or exon 21 L858R mutation: distinct mechanisms, different efficacies to treatments

With the development of antitumor therapies, different treatment methods including monotherapy and combined therapy have achieved clinical efficacy in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Exon 19 deletion (ex19del) and exon 21 L858R mutation are common sensitive subtypes of EGFR mutation. However, potential distinct mechanisms are found from several dimensions including molecular structures, biological behaviors, concomitant mutations, resistance mechanisms and tumor mutation burdens. More evidence indicates the prognostic difference of EGFR subgroups. This review focused on the progress of potential distinct mechanisms and outcomes in clinical trials of advanced NSCLC patients with ex19del or exon 21 L858R mutation.

Application of Zizao Yangrong Granules for Treating Targeted Drugs-Related Skin Xerosis: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study

Background: Dermatologic toxicities are the most common side effects associated with the targeted drugs epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), in which xerosis commonly complicated by pruritus severely disturbs the quality of life. The study has observed the curative effect of Zizao Yangrong granules (ZYG) from Chishui Xuanzhu in the treatment of EGFRIs-related xerosis and pruritus, as well as evaluating the safety of the prescription. Methods: Patients (n = 68) who had xerosis after using EGFRIs were enrolled and then randomly divided into the treatment group and control group, respectively, receiving ZYG and placebo granules combined with vitamin E ointment. The intervention lasted 4 weeks. Changes in xerosis and pruritus were observed, and blood routine examination as well as liver and kidney function are observed as safety indexes. The water content of skin and qualify of life were observed. Results: A total of 66 out of 68 patients finished the study with 34 patients in each group. The effective rates of xerosis among the treatment group and control group were 84.8% and 69.7% after 2 weeks’ treatment (P < .05), while they were 84.8% and 75.8% after 4 weeks’ treatment (P < .05). The patients in the experimental group had better quality of life than that in the control group (P = .045). Conclusion: ZYG can effectively improve the skin dryness associated with EGFRIs, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients with good safety; however, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these findings.

Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of EGFRm+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of afatinib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer following osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease: A retrospective study

Background Osimertinib is one of the first-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, the occurrence rate of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is particularly high in Japanese patients and little information on subsequent cancer treatment options after recovery from osimertinib-induced ILD is currently available. Thus, this study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of afatinib for the treatment of NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD. Methods We retrospectively investigated the clinical courses of all NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations at our facility between August 2018 and September 2019, who received osimertinib as first-line treatment and were subsequently treated with afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. Results Forty-two patients received osimertinib treatment at our facility during the study period, and four patients received afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. All events of ILD improved either spontaneously or with steroid therapy before the initiation of afatinib. For the four patients who were retrospectively reviewed, the overall response rate to afatinib therapy was 75%, and the disease control rate was 100%. During the study period, no ILD recurrence was observed in any of the four patients. Conclusions According to our study findings, afatinib treatment after osimertinib-induced ILD is considered safe and effective and it can be used as one of the treatment options for NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD.

Efficacy and safety of afatinib for non-small-cell lung cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acting as an irreversible and multitarget blocker of ErbB family members. Afatinib is currently approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common and uncommon sensitizing EGFR mutations and for squamous NSCLC patients progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of afatinib compared with chemotherapy and other EGFR TKIs, in order to evaluate its characteristics and potential role in the increasingly complex treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Future perspectives and innovative drug combinations are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Afatinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy and quality of life compared with chemotherapy with a managed toxicity profile. However, in recent years, the increasing availability of different treatment options for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC has made the current treatment scenario more complicated, with an increasing need of new and deeper scientific data. In this light, the identification and validation of potential clinicopathological and/or molecular predictors of benefit, as well as the clarification of resistance mechanisms, may help to clarify the most appropriate treatment strategies and sequences for EGFR-mutant patients.

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor in Colombia

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequences starting with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), afatinib and osimertinib, for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stages IIIB - IV in Colombia.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was designed, using information from global and progression-free survival curves. For first and second-generation TKI, second line treatment was assumed according to the presence of T790M mutation to define the use of osimertinib or chemotherapy. The cost of the states without progression and post-progression was estimated using the base case approach, identified through consultation with clinical experts.

RESULTS

The cost of treatment starting with afatinib in the first line was of 222,247 USD (1 USD = 3171.99 COP) and produced 1.36 QALYs. The strategy with afatinib was dominant with respect to that of first line TKI (227,289 USD and 1.34 QALY). The strategy with osimertinib resulted in more QALYs and higher costs, with ICERs of 35,062 USD, exceeding the current willingness to pay threshold for Colombia.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment starting with afatinib in the first line is dominant with respect to the strategy with first line TKI. The ICER of osimertinib sequence exceeds the threshold when compared with afatinib one.

Final Results from a Phase II Trial of Osimertinib for Elderly Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor t790m-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Progressed during Previous Treatment

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used for treating EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and osimertinib is effective in cases that acquired T790M mutations after treatment with the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, no study has evaluated its safety and efficacy in older patients. This phase II trial (jRCTs071180002) evaluated osimertinib in T790M mutation-positive Japanese patients who were ≥75 years old and had experienced relapse or progression after previous EGFR-TKI treatment. Our previous report that enrolled 36 patients showed the overall response rate (58.3%) and disease control rate (97.2%), while this report describes the results for the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analyses. The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-17.5), and the median OS was 22.0 months (95% CI: 16.0 months-not reached). The most frequent adverse events were anemia/hypoalbuminemia (27 patients, 75.0%), thrombocytopenia (21 patients, 58.3%), and paronychia/anorexia/diarrhea/neutropenia (15 patients, 41.7%). Pneumonitis was observed in four patients (11.1%), including two patients (5.6%) with Grade 3-4 pneumonitis. These results suggest that osimertinib was relatively safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer that acquired T790M mutations after previous EGFR-TKI treatment, even among patients who were ≥75 years old.

Nationwide Real-world Cohort Study of First-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Only a few randomized trials directly compared the relative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and most trials comprised selected series from Asian populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the overall survival (OS) of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in a large white population and to evaluate variation between different TKIs and identify predictors of survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information about clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival for 873 patients with stage IV EGFR + NSCLC, diagnosed from 2015 through 2017, was derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS was evaluated by actuarial analysis and multivariable Cox regression. Prognostic factors are reported as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 596 (68%) patients received first-line treatment with regular TKIs, providing a median survival of 20.2 months. Forty-five percent of patients were 70 years and older, and 54% of patients had distant metastasis in multiple organs. In the multivariate analysis, survival was significantly worse for men, and patients with higher age, poorer performance, and ≥ 3 organs with metastasis. Compared with erlotinib, OS was worse for gefitinib users (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.64), predominantly in patients with brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Dutch patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with regular TKIs have a median OS of 20.2 months in a nationwide real-world cohort. In patients with brain metastasis, erlotinib showed superior results compared with gefitinib and was similar to afatinib.

Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction Afatinib is used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common EGFR mutations; however, the clinicopathological factors that predict this drug's effectiveness in real-world settings remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of afatinib in such patients and assessed potential prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with NSCLC who received first-line afatinib between July 2014 and August 2018. Variables (including sex, age, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR genotype, smoking status, clinical stage prior to treatment [stage IV vs.. postoperative recurrence], presence or absence of brain metastases, body surface area, any afatinib dose reductions, and afatinib starting dose [40 vs.. 20 or 30 mg]) were subjected to a Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were included; the objective response rate was 62.5% (30 patients). The median PFS was 14.1 months; the PFS periods were 11.8 and 15.9 months for patients receiving 40 mg versus 20-30 mg of afatinib (P = 0.41), respectively, and were 14.5 and 13.8 months for patients who required afatinib dose reduction and those who did not, respectively (P = 0.80). The PFS tended to be longer in patients without brain metastases (albeit not significantly). Ultimately, no significant predictive values for PFS were identified. Conclusions Afatinib is effective for patients with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations irrespective of their clinicopathological backgrounds. A direct comparison of afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients is warranted to determine the optimal standard of care.

Systemic treatment of brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases (BrMs) are associated with significant morbidity and are found in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of the literature focuses on symptomatic BrMs, with a lack of baseline brain imaging in asymptomatic patients. Unfortunately, much of the data on local treatments with or without systemic treatment is retrospective. Clinical trials of systemic treatments largely exclude patients with BrMs. Chemotherapy is an active treatment for BrM with response rates in the brain similar to other sites of disease. Targeted systemic treatments in patients with driver mutations (EGFR and ALK-MET to date) have impressive central nervous system (CNS) penetrance and response rates. Unfortunately, no prospective data can currently guide the timings or modality of local therapies with systemic treatments in these patients who have a high incidence of CNS disease, but retrospective data suggest that early local therapies may give better intracranial progression-free survival (ICPFS). Recent immunotherapy trials have included patients with BrMs. These patients have largely been pre-treated with local therapies and are asymptomatic. Thus, the current standard is becoming, early local therapies before or in conjunction with immunotherapy agents. The approach seems to be safe. Prospective studies are needed in NSCLC BrMs patients to make sure any benefit from local therapies on the ICPFS and quality of life is not overlooked. Here we report what we think are reasonable conclusions from the available data and make suggestions for future clinical trials in the management of NSCLC BrMs.

Advances in targeting acquired resistance mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor samples and circulating tumor DNA has revolutionized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in lung cancer. The identification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) oncogenic driver has translated into successful therapy of advanced lung cancer using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Unfortunately, responses are limited by acquired mechanisms of resistance. We review herein the current landscape of acquired resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKI therapy and recent advances in therapeutic strategies to overcome acquired resistance.

Safety of EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Lung cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide. Over the past decade, the emergence of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has ushered in a new era of lung cancer treatment. Therefore, clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of these drugs are important.Areas covered: This review provides an overview on the safety of three classes of EGFR-TKIs and discusses the adverse events (AEs) and reactions reported in the literature.Expert opinion: EGFR-TKIs significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with an activating mutation of EGFR. However, EGFR-TKIs also block the EGFR-regulating pathways in the skin and gastrointestinal tract and cause AEs, including diarrhea, liver toxicity, skin disease, stomatitis, interstitial lung disease, and ocular toxicity, which have detrimental effects on quality of life and drug compliance. Clinicians should understand how to prevent and control these adverse reactions, which can often be achieved by dose reduction, discontinuation of treatment, or switching to another drug.

EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: factors to consider when deciding first-line therapy

Introduction: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancers with EGFR mutation belong to the models of solid tumors which revealed the concept of oncogene addiction. For that reason, first, second and third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the major anti-cancer drugs used in this indication. Translational research is currently focused on induced mechanisms of resistance and aims to define the best first therapeutic option and the best multiline strategy.Areas covered: EGFR TKIs, alone or in combination, i.e. anti-angiogenic drugs or chemotherapy, have demonstrated their ability to improve median PFS and OS in large randomized phase 3 trials. All these combinations, now available in first-line for EGFR mutated advanced NSLC, need to integrate multiple factors like patients characteristics (age, co-morbidities, eligibility to platinum-based chemotherapy), presence of brain metastasis at diagnosis, and type of EGFR mutation. This review has 2 aims: (1) to discuss the current knowledge of therapies available in non pre-treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC; (2) to propose the best therapeutic option according to multiple parameters, either clinical or biological.Expert commentary: In 2020, we can affirm that osimertinib the first choice for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, this has to be balanced with patient characteristics, type of EGFR mutation and new therapeutic options.

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Analysis of real-world data in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan

Introduction

Comparison of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) would improve patients’ clinical benefits and save costs. Using real-world data, this study attempted to directly compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-line afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.

Methods

During May 2011-December 2017, all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) visiting a tertiary center were invited to fill out the EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires and World Health Organization Quality of Life, brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), and received follow-ups for survival and direct medical costs. A total of 379 patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC under first-line TKIs were enrolled for analysis. After propensity score matching for the patients receiving afatinib (n = 48), erlotinib (n = 48), and gefitinib (n = 96), we conducted the study from the payers’ perspective with a lifelong time horizon.

Results

Patients receiving afatinib had the worst lifetime psychometric scores, whereas the differences in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) were modest. Considering 3 treatments together, afatinib was dominated by erlotinib. Erlotinib had an incremental cost-effectiveness of US$17,960/life year and US$12,782/QALY compared with gefitinib. Acceptability curves showed that erlotinib had 58.6% and 78.9% probabilities of being cost-effective given a threshold of 1 Taiwanese per capita GDP per life year and QALY, respectively.

Conclusion

Erlotinib appeared to be cost-effective. Lifetime psychometric scores may provide additional information for effectiveness evaluation.

Canadian consensus: a new systemic treatment algorithm for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Multiple clinical trials for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) have recently been reported. As a result, the treatment algorithm has changed, and many important clinical questions have been raised:■ What is the optimal first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated nsclc?■ What is preferred first-line treatment for patients with brain metastasis?■ What is the preferred second-line treatment for patients who received first-line first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis)?■ What is the preferred treatment after osimertinib?■ What evidence do we have for treating patients whose tumours harbour uncommon EGFR mutations?

Methods

A Canadian expert panel was convened to define the key clinical questions, review recent evidence, and discuss and agree on practice recommendations for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated nsclc.

Results

The published overall survival results for osimertinib, combined with its central nervous system activity, have led to osimertinib becoming the preferred first-line treatment for patients with common EGFR mutations, including those with brain metastasis. Other agents could still have a role, especially when osimertinib is not available or not tolerated. Treatment in subsequent lines of therapy depends on the first-line therapy or on T790M mutation status. Treatment recommendations for patients whose tumours harbour uncommon EGFR mutations are guided mainly by retrospective and limited prospective evidence. Finally, the evidence for sequencing and combining tkis with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other new therapeutics is reviewed.

Conclusions

This Canadian expert consensus statement and algorithm were driven by significant advances in the treatment of EGFR-mutated nsclc.

Determining the appropriate treatment for different EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations occur in a significant fraction of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most common activating mutations are in-frame deletion in exon 19 and point mutation in exon 21. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represent standard of care of EGFR mutated patients bearing common mutations. Therapy for individuals carrying uncommon mutations, such as G719X, L861Q, S768I, is less defined and few options exist for individuals harboring EGFR exon 20 mutations. In all mutated patients, drug resistance remains the most critical clinical problem and new agents and strategies are under investigation.Areas covered: We have reviewed the current status of NSCLC EGFR mutated treatment by analyzing data from preclinical studies, clinical prospective and retrospective trials in order to analyze current and future options for patients harboring different EGFR mutations.Expert opinion: At the present time, available data demonstrated that osimertinib is the best EGFR-TKI for front-line therapy. Other agents, such as dacomitinib, and new drug combinations, such as regimens including anti-angiogenic agents or chemotherapy, demonstrated to significantly prolong progression-free survival or overall survival, representing potential alternative to osimertinib. Many questions remain opened, including best drug sequencing and needing of new therapeutic approaches extending patient survival and cure rate.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: what is the preferred first-line therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mt+ nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were the first molecularly described NSCLC with an established 'targeted' therapy inhibiting mutated EGFR [EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)]. EGFR TKI of first and second generation have led to an unprecedented improvement in objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy with a significantly reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. Fast elucidation of the most frequent resistance mechanism against first and second-generation TKI, T790M, led to the approval of the third-generation TKI osimertinib in second line.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, the FLAURA study showed an impressive PFS benefit and immature OS data for osimertinib against solely first-generation TKI's. Also, the ARCHER study comparing dacomitinib against first-generation TKI showed a PFS and also OS benefit. Two studies combining EGFR TKI and antiangiogenesis showed PFS but no OS benefit. Lately, the combination of TKI and chemotherapy has seen a revival with the NEJ009 study, resulting in an impressive median OS of 55 months.

SUMMARY

Therefore, potentially four different therapeutic options are available in first-line therapy of EGFR mt+ NSCLC, first, second, third generation, TKI + antiangiogenic agent and TKI + chemotherapy. The purpose of the review is to help to guide physicians to decide in their treatment choice and discuss potential directions of research.

The use of radiation therapy for oligoprogressive/oligopersistent oncogene-driven non small cell lung cancer: State of the art

Oncogene-driven non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a distinct entity in thoracic oncology. The availability of effective target therapies, like EGFR inhibitors or ALK inhibitors, have revolutionized the prognosis of these patients. However, despite an initial response in the majority of patients, drug resistance ultimately occurs. In some cases, this resistance develops in few clonal cells (oligoprogression), so that a local ablation of these resistant deposits could allow to maintain the same systemic therapy and possibly to prolong patients' survival. For these purposes, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an ideal local ablative treatment, because it is effective, non invasive and with limited side effects. In this review, we aim to analyze available clinical data to verify whether SBRT can allow these patients to continue with existing target therapy longer, delay the switch to other systemic therapies and improve their outcome modifying the natural history of the disease.

Therapies after first-line afatinib in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC in Japan: retrospective analysis of LUX-Lung 3

Aim: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inevitable in non-small-cell lung cancer. To inform subsequent treatment decisions, we retrospectively assessed therapies following afatinib in Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 3. Patients & methods: LUX-Lung 3 was a randomized, open-label, Phase III study of afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in treatment-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive ( EGFRm+) advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Results: Among 47 Japanese patients who discontinued first-line afatinib, 91/81/62% received ≥one/two/three subsequent therapies. The most common second-line therapies were platinum-based chemotherapy (38%) and a first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (17%). Median overall survival (afatinib vs cisplatin/pemetrexed) was 47.8 versus 35.0 months (not significant). Conclusion: First-line afatinib does not appear to diminish suitability for subsequent therapies in EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Observational Study of Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib in EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Patients Treated with a 40-mg Starting Dose of Afatinib

Introduction

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, questions remain about the optimal treatment sequence of EGFR TKIs. The global, observational GioTag study demonstrated prolonged time on treatment with sequential afatinib and osimertinib therapy in patients who acquired the T790M mutation. Here, we assessed outcomes in patients who received the approved 40-mg starting dose of afatinib, as used in the clinical trial setting.

Methods

In the non-interventional, global, multicenter GioTag study, patients had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥ 10 months prior to data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who received afatinib 40 mg.

Results

In 169 patients who received an afatinib starting dose of 40 mg, median time on treatment was 27.6 months (90% confidence interval [CI] 26.3–31.3). Benefit was seen across patient subgroups, particularly those with Del19-positive disease and Asian patients; median time on treatment was 29.9 months (90% CI 27.6–46.7) in patients with Del19-positive disease and 46.7 months (90% CI 28.4–not reached) in Asian patients. The 2-year overall survival rate was 80%.

Conclusions

These real-world results support the overall study results and demonstrate prolonged time on treatment with sequential afatinib and osimertinib. The results suggest that sequential afatinib and osimertinib is a feasible therapeutic strategy for patients who acquire the T790M mutation, particularly those with Del19-positive disease or Asian patients.

Trial Registration Number

NCT03370770.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Dual Targeting of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Using Combination of Nimotuzumab and Erlotinib in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Report of Three Cases

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) occur in 3-5% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with a dismal prognosis. We report three cases of NSCLC with LM who were treated with the combination of nimotuzumab and erlotinib. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation during follow-up showed significant improvement in cancer symptoms and decreased tumor size in all three patients. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rarely seen. Based on apparent efficacy of the regimen and fewer side effects, we suggest that nimotuzumab in combination with erlotinib may be a promising option for the treatment of NSCLC with LM.

Gefitinib Versus Gefitinib Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Adding pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy to an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor may improve outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring an EGFR-sensitizing mutation and a performance status of 0 to 2 who were planned to receive first-line palliative therapy. Random assignment was 1:1 to gefitinib 250 mg orally per day (Gef) or gefitinib 250 mg orally per day plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under curve 5 intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed (gefitinib plus chemotherapy [Gef+C]). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2018, 350 patients were randomly assigned to Gef (n = 176) and Gef+C (n = 174). Twenty-one percent of patients had a performance status of 2, and 18% of patients had brain metastases. Median follow-up time was 17 months (range, 7 to 30 months). Radiologic response rates were 75% and 63% in the Gef+C and Gef arms, respectively (P = .01). Estimated median PFS was significantly longer with Gef+C than Gef (16 months [95% CI, 13.5 to 18.5 months] v 8 months [95% CI, 7.0 to 9.0 months], respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.66]; P < .001). Estimated median OS was significantly longer with Gef+C than Gef (not reached v 17 months [95% CI, 13.5 to 20.5 months]; hazard ratio for death, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]; P < .001). Clinically relevant grade 3 or greater toxicities occurred in 51% and 25% of patients in the Gef+C and Gef arms, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Adding pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy to gefitinib significantly prolonged PFS and OS but increased toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

Comparing the effectiveness of different EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

The study was to compare the effectiveness of different epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and received EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from real-world settings. Patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC and first received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib between 2011 and 2015 were included. The date of the first claim for EGFR-TKIs was set as the index date. Study endpoints were all-cause death and treatment failure that was defined when patients added on or switched to chemotherapy or terminal care. A total of 5,940 patients, including 3,982 (67.0%) receiving gefitinib, 1,207 (20.3%) receiving erlotinib, and 751 (12.7%) receiving afatinib, were eligible for this study. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rates for gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib groups were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72-75%), 75% (95% CI: 73-77%), and 80% (95% CI: 77-83%), respectively. Compared to gefitinib, afatinib was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93) but not erlotinib (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.05). Similar results were also found regarding the effectiveness of treatment. All the three EGFR-TKIs showed no differences for both outcomes among patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score of 2. The real-world data exhibited afatinib was more likely to be used for younger patients in a better condition than other EGFR inhibitors, and observed prolonged OS and treatment effectiveness compared to gefitinib after performing a multivariate Cox regression analysis.