201
|
Harshman LC, Preston MA, Bellmunt J, Beard C. Diagnosis of Bladder Carcinoma: A Clinician's Perspective. Surg Pathol Clin 2016; 8:677-85. [PMID: 26612221 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In 2014, more than 74,000 new cases and 15,000 deaths from bladder cancer were estimated to occur. The most reliable prognostic factors for survival are pathologic stage and histologic grade. Accordingly, a good understanding of the pathologic features of these cancers is essential to guide optimal clinical treatment, which requires a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. This review highlights several clinical scenarios in which detailed pathologic evaluation and accurate reporting impact clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 1230 DANA, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Mark A Preston
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45, Francis street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 1230 DANA, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Clair Beard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Aragon-Ching JB, Trump DL. Systemic therapy in muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: current trends and future promises. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2049-58. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder urothelial cancers remain an important urologic cancer with limited treatment options in the locally advanced and metastatic setting. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced muscle-invasive cancers has shown overall survival benefit, clinical uptake in practice have lagged behind. Controversies surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy use are also ongoing. Systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer have largely used platinum-based therapies without effective standard second-line therapy options for those who fail, although vinflunine is approved in Europe as a second-line therapy based on a Phase III trial, and most recently, atezolizumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, was approved by the US FDA. Given increasing recognition of mutational signatures expressed in urothelial carcinomas, several promising agents with use of VEGF-targeted therapies, HER2-directed agents and immunotherapies with PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in various settings are discussed herein.
Collapse
|
203
|
|
204
|
Mullane SA, Werner L, Guancial EA, Lis RT, Stack EC, Loda M, Kantoff PW, Choueiri TK, Rosenberg J, Bellmunt J. Expression Levels of DNA Damage Repair Proteins Are Associated With Overall Survival in Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 14:352-9. [PMID: 26778300 PMCID: PMC5508512 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Revised: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination platinum chemotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Defining the platinum response biomarkers for patients with mUC could establish personalize medicine and provide insights into mUC biology. Although DNA repair mechanisms have been hypothesized to mediate the platinum response, we sought to analyze whether increased expression of DNA damage genes would correlate with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified a clinically annotated cohort of patients with mUC, who had been treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy. A tissue microarray was constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumor before treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis of the following DNA repair proteins was performed: ERCC1, RAD51, BRCA1/2, PAR, and PARP-1. Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression was analyzed using multispectral imaging. Nuclear staining was used for the survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between the percentage of positive nuclear staining and OS in multivariable analysis, controlling for known prognostic variables. RESULTS In a cohort of 104 patients with mUC, a greater percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-4.9; P = .0007), RAD51 (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.3; P = .005), and PAR (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .026) was associated with worse OS. BRCA1, BRCA2, and PARP-1 expression was not associated with OS (P = .76, P = .38, and P = .09, respectively). A greater percentage of combined ERCC1 and RAD51 nuclear staining was strongly associated with worse OS (P = .005). CONCLUSION A high percentage of nuclear staining of ERCC1, RAD51, and PAR, assessed by immunohistochemistry, correlated with worse OS for patients with mUC treated with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy, supporting the evidence of the DNA repair pathways' role in the prognosis of mUC. We also report new evidence that RAD51 and PAR might play a role in the platinum response. Additional prospective studies are required to determine the prognostic or predictive nature of these biomarkers in mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Mullane
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lillian Werner
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Guancial
- Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Rosina T Lis
- Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Edward C Stack
- Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Massimo Loda
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Kaimakliotis HZ, Monn MF, Cho JS, Pedrosa JA, Hahn NM, Albany C, Gellhaus PT, Cary KC, Masterson TA, Foster RS, Bihrle R, Cheng L, Koch MO. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial bladder cancer: impact of regimen and variant histology. Future Oncol 2016; 12:1795-804. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We compared the efficacy of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in urothelial cancer and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) efficacy in variant histology (VH). Materials & methods: Radical cystectomy patients were retrospectively compared with those who received NACT. Factors associated with survival, pathologic complete response (pCR) and downstaging (pDS) were evaluated in multivariable models. Results: 9% of radical cystectomy patients (84/919) received NACT, with improved survival, pCR and pDS on both regimens. MVAC lead to higher pDS without an increase in pCR. On multivariable analysis, there was a nonsignificant increase in pDS with MVAC. NACT conferred similar responses in squamous and glandular differentiation VH. Conclusion: NACT was associated with improved survival, pCR and pDS. Furthermore, responses to NACT were not dependent on presence of VH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hristos Z Kaimakliotis
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - M Francesca Monn
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Jane S Cho
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Jose A Pedrosa
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Noah M Hahn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans Street, Room 1M51, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Costantine Albany
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Paul T Gellhaus
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - K Clint Cary
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Timothy A Masterson
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Richard S Foster
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Richard Bihrle
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Michael O Koch
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Ezaki T, Matsumoto K, Morita S, Shinoda K, Mizuno R, Kikuchi E, Oya M. A Case of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in a Patient With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Hemodialysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 14:e413-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2015] [Revised: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
207
|
Cisplatin versus carboplatin: comparative review of therapeutic management in solid malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 102:37-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
208
|
Sideris S, Aoun F, Zanaty M, Martinez NC, Latifyan S, Awada A, Gil T. Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel treatment as a single agent chemotherapy following first-line cisplatin treatment in urothelial bladder cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2016; 4:1063-1067. [PMID: 27284445 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of paclitaxel following a first-line cisplatin regimen in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. The present study retrospectively evaluated the clinical effects and toxicities of second-line paclitaxel regimens following first-line cisplatin treatment in metastatic bladder cancer. A total of 42 patients with progressing metastatic urothelial bladder cancer following cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received weekly treatment with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with a median duration of 3 months. The overall response rate, disease control rate and median progression free survival were 9.5, 45.2 and 6.4 months, respectively. Weekly paclitaxel was well-tolerated with rare grade III or IV toxicities. Second-line weekly paclitaxel treatment following first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in urothelial metastatic bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Sideris
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fouad Aoun
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Zanaty
- Data Center, Université Paris XII, 94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Sofia Latifyan
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gil
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Abida W, Milowsky MI, Ostrovnaya I, Gerst SR, Rosenberg JE, Voss MH, Apolo AB, Regazzi AM, McCoy AS, Boyd ME, Bajorin DF. Phase I Study of Everolimus in Combination with Gemcitabine and Split-Dose Cisplatin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2:111-117. [PMID: 27376132 PMCID: PMC4927849 DOI: 10.3233/blc-150038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Molecular profiling studies reveal that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is altered in a significant percentage of UCs. Objective: We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the feasibility of combining the mTOR inhibitor everolimus with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) in advanced UC in the first-line setting. Methods: Patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles for a total of 6 cycles in combination with everolimus at increasing dose levels (DL1:5 mg QOD, DL2:5 mg daily, DL3:10 mg daily) following a standard 3+3 design. Responses were assessed every 2 cycles. Patients with at least stable disease (SD) continued everolimus until progression. Goals were to establish dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination. Results: 12 patients were enrolled, 3 at DL1, 3 at DL2, and an additional 6 at DL1 *(DL1 following de-escalation). 3/3 patients at DL2 had DLTs during cycle 1. 2/8 evaluable patients at DL1/DL1 * had DLTs during cycle 1. DLTs were primarily hematologic. Further toxicities, also primarily hematologic, were observed during later treatment cycles, leading to 8 chemotherapy dose reductions overall. Partial responses were observed in 4/10 evaluable patients, and SD in 5/10. Median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 6.9, not reached). Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose was reached at the lowest dose level, 5 mg QOD, for everolimus in combination with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin in advanced UC. The regimen was limited by hematologic toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wassim Abida
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Irina Ostrovnaya
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott R Gerst
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin H Voss
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ashley M Regazzi
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Asia S McCoy
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Mariel E Boyd
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Dean F Bajorin
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Knollman H, Godwin JL, Jain R, Wong YN, Plimack ER, Geynisman DM. Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy. Ther Adv Urol 2015; 7:312-30. [PMID: 26622317 PMCID: PMC4647143 DOI: 10.1177/1756287215607418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy that carries a poor prognosis when the disease includes muscle invasion. Metastatic urothelial carcinoma is almost uniformly fatal. The evidence behind treatment options in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings are discussed in this manuscript, with a focused review of standard and investigational cytotoxic, targeted, and immunotherapy approaches. We have focused especially on neoadjuvant cisplatin-based therapy (supported by level one evidence) and on novel immunotherapy agents such as checkpoint inhibitors, which have shown great promise in early clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Knollman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J. Luke Godwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rishi Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yu-Ning Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth R. Plimack
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel M. Geynisman
- Assistant Professor of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Abstract
Myelosuppression is a dose-limiting adverse effect with antineoplastic therapy and nonchemotherapy medications. Clinicians have data and guidelines to provide direction for the management of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients with malignancies. Clinical situations outside oncology extrapolate these data along with limited data sets for those patients who demonstrate myelosuppressive effects from medications that are not traditionally considered cytotoxic. Pharmacological treatments can be used to help ameliorate the myelosuppressive toxicities. Recombinant technology has provided growth factors to counteract or lessen the degree of toxicity from myelosuppressive medications including chemotherapy. Clinical strategies and future trends on how to mitigate medication-related myelosuppression are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rickey C Miller
- Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alison Steinbach
- Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Shi Z, Zhuang Q, You R, Li Y, Li J, Cao D. Clinical and computed tomography imaging features of renal medullary carcinoma: A report of six cases. Oncol Lett 2015; 11:261-266. [PMID: 26870200 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) have a poor prognosis, usually due to late diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) analysis may aid the differentiation between RMC and other types of renal cell carcinoma, in order to establish an accurate early diagnosis. There is a limited number of reports in the literature focusing on clinical and multi-slice CT (MSCT) imaging findings of RMC. Consequently, the present study aimed to characterize the clinical and MSCT imaging features of RMC. For this purpose, the MSCT imaging findings of 6 patients with RMC were retrospectively studied. The patients were subjected to MSCT in order to investigate the characteristics of the tumors, including location, size, density, calcification, cystic or solid appearance, capsule sign, enhancement pattern and presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. The tumors in the current study presented a mean diameter of 7.48±3.25 cm, and were observed to be solitary and heterogeneous with necrotic components. The majority of the tumors did not contain calcifications (5/6); displayed an ill-defined margin (4/6); were centered in the medulla; extended into the renal pelvis or peripelvic tissues (6/6); and did not exhibit a fibrous capsule. Localized caliectasis was observed in 3 of the 6 cases. The attenuation of the solid region of the RMC on unenhanced CT was equal to that of the renal cortex or medulla (42.3±2.7 vs. 40.7±3.6 and 41.2±3.9 Hounsfield units, respectively; P>0.05) while, on enhanced CT, the enhancement of the tumor was lower than that of the normal renal cortex and medulla during all phases (cortical phase, 52.6±4.8 vs. l99.5±9.7 and 72.7±6.4; medullary phase, 58.6±5.7 vs. 184.6±10.8 and 93.5±7.8; delayed phase, 56.8±6.1 vs. 175.7±8.5 and 96.5±7.9, respectively; P<0.05). In conclusion, RMC tends to be an infiltrative, ill-defined heterogeneous mass with intratumoral necrosis, which arises from the renal medulla, and displays lower enhancement than the renal cortex and medulla during all phases on enhanced CT. Despite its rarity in adults, RMC should be included in a differential diagnosis when CT imaging reveals these features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenshan Shi
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Qian Zhuang
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
| | - Ruixiong You
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Yueming Li
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| | - Dairong Cao
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Docetaxel has had a significant impact on the management of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Multiple phase II trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic UC. Docetaxel is an accepted community standard for the therapy of platinum-treated patients with metastatic UC. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on the data supporting a role for docetaxel in the therapy of advanced UC. It also explores the future development of docetaxel and describes the ongoing clinical trials in the treatment of UC. EXPERT OPINION Docetaxel plays an important role as one of the standard agents used in the comparator arms of randomized trials evaluating new agents as salvage therapy for metastatic UC. Furthermore, biologic agents are being developed in chemo-biologic regimens using docetaxel as the platform. In the context of emerging novel agents such as T-cell checkpoint inhibitors, docetaxel may continue to play a role as a salvage therapy in select patients ineligible for immunotherapy or following checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costantine Albany
- a Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology-Oncology , Indiana University Simon Cancer Center , Indianapolis , IN 46202 , USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- b Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology-Oncology , Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham , AL , USA.,c Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology-Oncology , University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Comprehensive Cancer Center , Birmingham , AL 35294 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Fakhrejahani F, Tomita Y, Maj-Hes A, Trepel JB, De Santis M, Apolo AB. Immunotherapies for bladder cancer: a new hope. Curr Opin Urol 2015; 25:586-96. [PMID: 26372038 PMCID: PMC6777558 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review recent data on immunotherapies for bladder cancer and discuss strategies to maximize the antitumor effect of immunotherapy in solid tumors. RECENT FINDINGS Anti-programmed death ligand 1 has shown promise in advanced bladder cancer. Clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination are underway. Here we review strategies for enhancing antitumor immunity using immunomodulating agents or combination treatments that may increase tumor response. SUMMARY Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other treatment modalities may lead to the development of new treatment strategies in advanced bladder cancer; however, identifying predictive biomarkers is essential for appropriate patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Fakhrejahani
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Yusuke Tomita
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Agnes Maj-Hes
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jane B. Trepel
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Maria De Santis
- Cancer Research Unit, Warwick University Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Andrea B. Apolo
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
The comparison of oncologic outcomes between metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:495.e9-495.e14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Revised: 05/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
216
|
Cisplatin- Versus Non-Cisplatin-based First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Previously Treated With Perioperative Cisplatin. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:331-40. [PMID: 26589729 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal choice of first-line chemotherapy for patients with relapse of urothelial carcinoma (UC) after perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy (PCBC) is unclear. We investigated the outcomes with cisplatin rechallenge versus a non-cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent metastatic UC after PCBC in a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient-level data were collected for patients who had received various first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced UC after previous PCBC. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of the type of perioperative and first-line chemotherapy to independently affect overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after accounting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS Data were available for 145 patients (12 centers). The mean age was 62 years; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was > 0 for 42.0% of the patients. Of the 145 patients, 63% had received cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The median time from previous chemotherapy (TFPC) was 6.2 months (range, 1-154 months). The median OS was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-27 months), and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5-7 months). A better ECOG PS and a longer TFPC (> 12 months vs. ≤ 12 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52; P < .001) was prognostic for OS and PFS. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.13-3.06; P = .015), which appeared to be pronounced in those patients with a TFPC of ≤ 12 months. Retreatment with cisplatin in the first-line setting was associated with worse OS (HR, 3.38; P < .001). CONCLUSION The results of the present retrospective analysis suggest that for patients who have undergone previous PCBC for UC, rechallenging with cisplatin might confer a poorer OS, especially for those with progression within < 1 year.
Collapse
|
217
|
Zhao B, Grivas PD. Contemporary Systemic Therapy for Urologic Malignancies in Geriatric Patients. Clin Geriatr Med 2015; 31:645-65. [PMID: 26476122 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Current data on systemic therapy in geriatric populations with genitourinary malignancies are largely derived from retrospective analyses of prospectively conducted trials or retrospective reviews. Although extrapolation of these data to real-world patients should be cautious, patients aged 65 years or older with good functional status and minimal comorbidities seem to enjoy similar survival benefit from therapy as their younger counterparts. Chronologic age alone should generally not be used to guide management decisions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment tools and prospective studies in older adults integrating comprehensive geriatric assessment can shed light on the optimal management of urologic malignancies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Zhao
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk R30, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Petros D Grivas
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk R35, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Bamias A, Peroukidis S, Stamatopoulou S, Tzannis K, Koutsoukos K, Andreadis C, Bozionelou V, Pistalmatzian N, Papatsoris A, Stravodimos K, Varthalitis I, Karamouzis M, Milaki G, Agorastos A, Kentepozidis N, Androulakis N, Bompolaki I, Kalofonos H, Mavroudis D, Dimopoulos MA. Utilization of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Collaborative Study by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG). Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 14:e153-9. [PMID: 26437909 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced urothelial cancer (AUCa) is associated with poor long-term survival. Two major concerns are related to nonexposure to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and poor outcome after relapse. Our purpose was to record patterns of practice in AUCa in Greece, focusing on first-line treatment and management of relapsed disease. METHODS Patients with AUCa treated from 2011 to 2013 were included in the analysis. Fitness for cisplatin was assessed by recently established criteria. RESULTS Of 327 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 179 (55%) did not receive cisplatin. Criteria for unfitness for cisplatin were: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2, 21%; creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min, 55%; hearing impairment, 8%; neuropathy, 1%; and cardiac failure, 5%. Forty-six patients (27%) did not fulfill any criterion for unfitness for cisplatin. The main reasons for these deviations were comorbidities (28%) and advanced age (32%). Seventy-four (68%) of 109 patients who experienced a relapse received second-line chemotherapy. The most frequent reason for not offering second-line chemotherapy was poor PS or limited life expectancy (66%). CONCLUSION In line with international data, approximately 50% of Greek patients with AUCa do not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although 27% of them were suitable for such treatment. In addition, about one third of patients with relapse did not receive second-line chemotherapy because of poor PS or short life expectancy. Enforcing criteria for fitness for cisplatin and earlier diagnosis of relapse represent 2 targets for improvement in current treatment practice for AUCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotle Bamias
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Stavros Peroukidis
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | | | - Kimon Tzannis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Charalambos Andreadis
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Bozionelou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Georgia Milaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Antonios Agorastos
- 3rd Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikos Kentepozidis
- Medical Oncology Department, 251 General Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Androulakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Venizelio Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Iliada Bompolaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Chania, Chania, Greece
| | - Haralampos Kalofonos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, and Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
219
|
McConkey DJ, Choi W, Shen Y, Lee IL, Porten S, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Corn P, Millikan RE, Dinney C, Czerniak B, Siefker-Radtke AO. A Prognostic Gene Expression Signature in the Molecular Classification of Chemotherapy-naïve Urothelial Cancer is Predictive of Clinical Outcomes from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Phase 2 Trial of Dose-dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin with Bevacizumab in Urothelial Cancer. Eur Urol 2015; 69:855-62. [PMID: 26343003 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene expression profiling (GEP) suggests there are three subtypes of muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (UC): basal, which has the worst prognosis; p53-like; and luminal. We hypothesized that GEP of transurethral resection (TUR) and cystectomy specimens would predict subtypes that could benefit from chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To explore clinical outcomes for patients treated with dose-dense (DD) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and bevacizumab (B) and the impact of UC subtype. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Sixty patients enrolled in a neoadjuvant trial of four cycles of DDMVAC + B between 2007 and 2010. TUR and cystectomy specimens for GEP were available from 38 and 23 patients, respectively, and from an additional confirmation cohort of 49 patients treated with perioperative MVAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and log-rank tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Chemotherapy was active, with pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 downstaging rates of 38% and 53%, respectively, and 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 63%. Bevacizumab had no appreciable impact on outcomes. Basal tumors had improved survival compared to luminal and p53-like tumors (5-yr OS 91%, 73%, and 36%, log-rank p=0.015), with similar findings on multivariate analysis. Bone metastases within 2 yr were exclusively associated with the p53-like subtype (p53-like 100%, luminal 0%, basal 0%; p ≤ 0.001). Tumors enriched with the p53-like subtype at cystectomy suggested chemoresistance for this subtype. A separate cohort treated with perioperative MVAC confirmed the UC subtype survival benefit (5-yr OS 77% for basal, 56% for luminal, and 56% for p53-like; p=0.021). Limitations include the small number of pretreatment specimens with sufficient tissue for GEP. CONCLUSION GEP was predictive of clinical UC outcomes. The basal subtype was associated with better survival, and the p53-like subtype was associated with bone metastases and chemoresistant disease. PATIENT SUMMARY We can no longer think of urothelial cancer as a single disease. Gene expression profiling identifies subtypes of urothelial cancer that differ in their natural history and sensitivity to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J McConkey
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Woonyoung Choi
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Statistics, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - I-Ling Lee
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sima Porten
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Colin Dinney
- Department of Urology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bogdan Czerniak
- Department of Pathology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Iyer G, Calabró F, Bajorin DF. Treatment of metastatic bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
221
|
Sundararajan S, Vogelzang NJ. Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 therapy for bladder cancer: what is on the horizon? Future Oncol 2015; 11:2299-306. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncologic therapeutics has evolved enormously as we entered the 21st century. Unfortunately, the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer has remained unchanged over the last two decades despite a better understanding of the genetic alterations in bladder cancer. Pathways such as the PI3K/AKT3/mTOR and FGFR have been implicated in urothelial bladder cancer. However, targeted therapies have not shown proven benefit yet and are still considered investigational. Recently, researchers have been successful in manipulating the systemic immune response to mount antitumor effects in melanoma, lung cancer and lymphoma. Historically, intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin immunotherapy has been highly active in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Early data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors will soon prove to be another cornerstone in the treatment armamentarium of advanced bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas J Vogelzang
- University of Nevada School of Medicine & US Oncology/Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89014, USA
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Kim M, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee E, Keam B, Kim TM, Heo DS, Lee SH, Moon KC. Predictive and Prognostic Value of Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M1 and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) Treated with First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Platinum Combination Chemotherapy. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0133371. [PMID: 26200905 PMCID: PMC4511592 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that expression of ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 (RRM1) and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) is associated with resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. We evaluated the significance of RRM1 and ERCC1 expression to predict tumor response to gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy (GP) and survival in advanced UC. We retrospectively collected tumor samples and reviewed clinical data of 53 patients with unresectable or metastatic UC, who were treated with first-line GP. RRM1 and ERCC1 expression were measured by immunohistochemistry. Among 53 patients, 12 (22.6%) and 26 (49.1%) patients had tumors that demonstrated a high expression for RRM1 and ERCC1, respectively. Twenty-nine (70.7%) of 41 patients with low RRM1 expression achieved a clinical response (complete + partial responses), but only 3 (25.0%) of 12 patients with high RRM1 expression achieved a clinical response after GP (P=0.007). Nineteen (70.4%) of 27 patients with low ERCC1 expression achieved a clinical response, while 13 (50.0%) of 26 patients with high ERCC1 expression achieved a clinical response (P=0.130). High RRM1 expression was associated with shorter progression free survival and overall survival (PFS P=0.006, OS P=0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with high RRM1 expression had a significantly greater risk of progression and death than those with low RRM1 expression. ERCC1 status was not a significant predictor for PFS and OS. RRM1 expression was predictive and prognostic of clinical outcome in advanced UC treated with gemcitabine plus platinum combination chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miso Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunsik Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bhumsuk Keam
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Seog Heo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se-Hoon Lee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Chul Moon
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
van de Putte EEF, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, van der Heijden MS, Bex A, van der Poel HG, Kerst JM, Bergman AM, Horenblas S, van Rhijn BWG. Neoadjuvant induction dose-dense MVAC for muscle invasive bladder cancer: efficacy and safety compared with classic MVAC and gemcitabine/cisplatin. World J Urol 2015; 34:157-62. [PMID: 26184106 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1636-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant induction dose-dense MVAC (dd-MVAC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Results of the 2-week-per-cycle regimen were compared with classic MVAC (4 weeks per cycle) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC, 3 weeks per cycle). METHODS We included 166 patients with non-organ-confined MIBC, who received neoadjuvant induction dd-MVAC (80), classic MVAC (35), or GC (51) between 1990 and 2014. Complete pathological response (pCR) was defined as no evidence of residual tumor in cystectomy and lymphadenectomy specimens (ypT0N0). pCR and toxicity rates were compared among regimens. RESULTS pCR was found in 29% of dd-MVAC-treated patients, which was not significantly different from classic MVAC (20%, p = 0.366) and GC (32%, p = 0.845). Grade 3-4 toxicity rates related to dd-MVAC and GC (44%) were similar (p = 0.202), whereas the toxicity rate for classic MVAC (55%) was significantly higher than for dd-MVAC (32%) uncorrected (p = 0.026) and corrected for patient and tumor characteristics (OR 2.84, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant induction dd-MVAC resulted in pathological response rates similar to classic MVAC and GC treatment in patients with non-organ-confined MIBC. The shorter cycle duration compared with classic MVAC and GC and the significantly lower toxicity rate compared with classic MVAC indicate that dd-MVAC should be the preferred option for neoadjuvant induction treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Rudzinski JK, Basappa NS, North S. Perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015; 9:249-54. [PMID: 26125306 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radical cystectomy with or without systemic chemotherapy is considered a standard of care for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current and recent literature published within the last 12 months reviewing the evidence for use of perioperative chemotherapy for patients with MIBC. RECENT FINDINGS In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting, the evidence demonstrates clinical efficacy and lower rate of toxicity with the use of high-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (MVAC) compared with standard MVAC. Higher quality evidence for the use of gemcitabine with cisplatin is not yet available. Meta-analysis of cisplatin-based regimens in the adjuvant setting demonstrates significant benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival specifically in patients with lymph-node-positive disease. SUMMARY The available evidence suggests that along with radical cystectomy, cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy should be the standard of care in patients with MIBC with a higher quality and quantity of literature in support of the NAC approach. Adoption of perioperative chemotherapy for MIBC is on the rise in North America, which is reassuring. Novel therapeutic approaches for cisplatin-ineligible patients are currently being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan K Rudzinski
- aDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery bDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
225
|
Beyond conventional chemotherapy: Emerging molecular targeted and immunotherapy strategies in urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:699-706. [PMID: 26138514 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Advanced urothelial carcinoma is frequently lethal, and improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy have plateaued. Recent technological advances allows for a comprehensive analysis of genomic alterations in a timely manner. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study revealed that there are numerous genomic aberrations in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, such as TP53, ARID1A, PIK3CA, ERCC2, FGFR3, and HER2. Molecular targeted therapies against similar genetic alterations are currently available for other malignancies, but their efficacy in urothelial carcinoma has not been established. This review describes the genomic landscape of malignant urothelial carcinomas, with an emphasis on the potential to prosecute these tumours by deploying novel targeted agents and immunotherapy in appropriately selected patient populations.
Collapse
|
226
|
Jayaratna IS, Navai N, Dinney CPN. Risk based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2015; 4:273-82. [PMID: 26816830 PMCID: PMC4708231 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.06.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive disease that frequently requires radical cystectomy (RC) to achieve durable cure rates. Surgery is most effective when performed in organ-confined disease, with the best outcomes for those patients with a pT0 result. The goals of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) are to optimize surgical outcomes for a malignancy with limited adjuvant therapies and a lack of effective salvage treatments. Despite level 1 evidence demonstrating a survival benefit, the utilization of NC has been hampered by several issues, including, the inability to predict responders and the perception that NC may delay curative surgery. In this article, we review the current efforts to identify patients that are most likely to derive a benefit from NC, in order to create a risk-adapted paradigm that reserves NC for those who need it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isuru S Jayaratna
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Colin P N Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Necchi A, Giannatempo P, Paolini B, Lo Vullo S, Marongiu M, Farè E, Raggi D, Nicolai N, Piva L, Catanzaro M, Biasoni D, Torelli T, Stagni S, Maffezzini M, Gianni AM, De Braud F, Mariani L, Sonpavde G, Colecchia M, Salvioni R. Immunohistochemistry to Enhance Prognostic Allocation and Guide Decision-Making of Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 13:171-7.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Revised: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
228
|
Carcinomes urothéliaux, formes métastatiques : traitements médicaux d’aujourd’hui et de demain. ONCOLOGIE 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-015-2505-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
229
|
First-Line Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Metastatic Bladder Cancer for Platinum-Eligible Patients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29:319-28, ix-x. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
230
|
Lucca I, Leow JJ, Shariat SF, Chang SL. Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29:271-88, ix. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
231
|
Burgess EF. Individualized management of advanced bladder cancer: Where do we stand? Urol Oncol 2015; 33:187-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2013] [Revised: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
232
|
Seront E, Machiels JP. Molecular biology and targeted therapies for urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41:341-53. [PMID: 25828962 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2014] [Revised: 03/08/2015] [Accepted: 03/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) is associated with poor prognosis. In the first-line setting, platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care but resistance rapidly occurs. With no validated treatment proven to increase survival after platinum failure, there is an urgent unmet medical need to develop new and efficacious cytotoxic agents. A better understanding of the molecular signaling pathways regulating UC has led to the development of new and innovative therapeutic strategies. Despite this, many recent drugs show only modest activity as single agents, and combining them with standard chemotherapy does not seem to enhance efficacy. Ongoing research is producing, however, a generation of new drugs that are showing promising results in clinical trials. This paper aims to review the most important mechanisms in bladder cancer tumorigenesis and describe the new therapeutic options currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Seront
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital de Jolimont, Rue Ferrer 159, 7100 La Louvière, Belgium; Institut Roi Albert II, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Jean-Pascal Machiels
- Institut Roi Albert II, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Powles T. Immunotherapy: The development of immunotherapy in urothelial bladder cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 12:193-4. [PMID: 25781573 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Jordan EJ, Iyer G. Targeted therapy in advanced bladder cancer: what have we learned? Urol Clin North Am 2015; 42:253-62, ix. [PMID: 25882566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in the treatment of other genitourinary malignancies, no novel therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the last 20 years. To date, no clinical trials of targeted agents in UC have led to improvements in survival compared with cytotoxic therapy. This article outlines representative trials of targeted therapies in UC and discusses the significance of genetic preselection in trial design as a method to optimize responses to these agents, thus, hopefully expanding the armamentarium of treatment options against this lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmet J Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Sfakianos JP, Galsky MD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: bridging the gap between evidence and practice. Urol Clin North Am 2015; 42:181-7, viii. [PMID: 25882560 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, population-based studies reveal that only a small fraction of patients actually receive such treatment. A comprehensive understanding of the reasons for this gap between efficacy and effectiveness is necessary to increase the likelihood of cure of all patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These reasons include systems-, provider-, and patient-level barriers that are not amenable to a single solution. Tackling each barrier will ultimately be necessary to bridge the disconnect between what is achievable and what is actually achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Sfakianos
- Departments of Urology and Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Departments of Urology and Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Abstract
Metastatic bladder cancer is a lethal disease. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy, including the combination regimens gemcitabine-cisplatin and methotrexate-vinblastine-doxorubicin-cisplatin, are the standard first-line therapies. Second-line therapies have modest activity and no significant improvement in patient outcomes. Agents targeting growth, survival, and proliferation pathways have been added to cytotoxic therapy with limited added benefit to date. Modulating host immune response to cancer-associated antigens appears promising, with multiple new therapeutic approaches being pursued. Next-generation sequencing of invasive urothelial carcinoma has provided insights into the biology of this disease and potential actionable targets. Alterations in the receptor tyrosine kinase/Ras pathway and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway represent potential therapeutic targets in advanced disease, and novel agents are in development. Recent data from the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network bladder cancer cohort and other efforts suggest that mutations in chromatin-regulatory genes are very common in invasive bladder tumors, and are more frequent than in other studied tumors. The discovery of new genomic alterations challenges drug development to change the course of this disease.
Collapse
|
237
|
Narayan V, Vaughn D. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity considerations in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2015; 11:731-42. [DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1005600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
238
|
Tomlinson B, Lin TY, Dall'Era M, Pan CX. Nanotechnology in bladder cancer: current state of development and clinical practice. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2015; 10:1189-201. [PMID: 25929573 PMCID: PMC4562431 DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Nanotechnology is being developed for the diagnosis and treatment of both nonmyoinvasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and invasive bladder cancer. The diagnostic applications of nanotechnology in NMIBC mainly focus on tumor identification during endoscopy to increase complete resection of bladder cancer while nanotechnology to capture malignant cells or their components continues to be developed. The therapeutic applications of nanotechnology in NMIBC are to reformulate biological and cytotoxic agents for intravesical instillation, combine both diagnostic and therapeutic application in one nanoformulation. In invasive and advanced bladder cancer, magnetic resonance imaging with supraparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles can improve the sensitivity and specificity in detecting small metastasis to lymph nodes. Nanoformulation of cytotoxic agents can potentially decrease the toxicity while increasing efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Tomlinson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Tzu-yin Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Marc Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Chong-Xian Pan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
- VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA 95655, USA
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Dalibon P. Le cancer de la vessie : des perspectives thérapeutiques. ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actpha.2014.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
240
|
Aragon-Ching JB. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Are We Asking the Right Questions? J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:4169-70. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.3154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
241
|
Choi YJ, Lee SH, Lee JL, Ahn JH, Lee KH, You D, Hong B, Hong JH, Ahn H. Phase II study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: the PECULIAR study (KCSG 10-17). Br J Cancer 2014; 112:260-5. [PMID: 25429526 PMCID: PMC4453451 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pemetrexed has shown a favourable response rate of about 30% with minimal toxicity when used as a single agent for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Methods: This multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients who had advanced urothelial carcinoma, ECOG PS 0–2, and measurable disease. Pemetrexed 500 mg m−2 with cisplatin 70 mg m−2 on day 1 were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; ECOG 0–1, 100% visceral metastasis, 54.8% recurrent disease, 57.1%). Twenty-seven partial responses for an ORR of 64.3% (95% CI, 49.2%–77.0%) were documented. Seven patients had stable disease. Median PFS and OS were 6.9 (95% CI, 6.2–7.6) and 14.4 (95% CI, 10.4–18.4) months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 28.6% of patients. No patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Conclusion: The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin is active, and well tolerated in patients with advanced urothelial cancer as a first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y J Choi
- 1] Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea [2] Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S H Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J-L Lee
- 1] Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea [2] Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J-H Ahn
- 1] Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea [2] Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D You
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - B Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - H Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
Tomasello G, Liguigli W, Poli R, Lazzarelli S, Brighenti M, Negri F, Curti A, Martinotti M, Olivetti L, Rovatti M, Donati G, Passalacqua R. Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy with modified dose-dense TCF regimen (TCF-dd) in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: final results of a phase II trial. Gastric Cancer 2014; 17:711-7. [PMID: 24282019 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-013-0317-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/10/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously studied a dose-dense TCF (TCF-dd) regimen demonstrating its feasibility and an activity comparable to epirubicin-based chemotherapy and TCF q3w in terms of overall survival and time to progression (TTP). We report here the final results of a phase II study of chemotherapy with a modified TCF-dd regimen in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN Patients with histologically confirmed measurable MGC, not previously treated for advanced disease, received docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) day 1, l-folinic acid 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) bolus days 1 and 2, and then 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-h continuous infusion days 1 and 2, every 14 days, plus pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 3. Patients aged ≥65 years received the same schedule with a dose reduction of 30 %. RESULTS Study duration: December 2007-November 2010. Forty-six consecutive patients were enrolled (78 % male, 22 % female; median age, 66 years, range, 38-76 years; ECOG PS: 0, 48 %, 1, 46 %). Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). A median of four cycles (range, one to six) was administered. Forty-three patients were evaluated for response (93.5 %) and all for toxicity: 3 complete response (CR), 25 partial response (PR), 10 stable disease (SD), and 5 progressive disease (PD) were observed, for an ORR by intention to treat (ITT) of 61 % (95 % CI 47-75). Median overall survival (OS) was 17.63 months (95 % CI, 13.67-20.67); median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (95 % CI, 6.5-13.4). Twenty-one patients (46.0 %) were treated at full doses without any delay, thus respecting the dose-dense criterion. Most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (20 %), leukopenia (4 %), thrombocytopenia (2 %), anemia (2 %), febrile neutropenia (6 %), asthenia (22 %), diarrhea (4 %), nausea/vomiting (11 %), and hypokalemia (6 %). Overall, TCF-dd was shown to be safe. CONCLUSIONS The TCF-dd regimen in locally advanced or MGC is confirmed to be feasible and very active and needs to be further tested in randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Tomasello
- Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, 26100, Cremona, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
243
|
Hafeez S, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation for the treatment of muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a review of current and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14:1429-43. [PMID: 25263197 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2014.953938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Radical treatment remains underutilized for those with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radical radiotherapy, in particular, continues to be perceived by many as reserved only for patients unfit for cystectomy. However, with concurrent use of radiosensitizers, radiotherapy can achieve excellent local control and survival comparable to modern surgical series, thus presenting a real alternative to surgery. The possibility of further enhancing patient outcome is likely to come from both advances in radiotherapy treatment delivery and appropriate candidate selection. Growing evidence from selective bladder preservation trials demonstrate long term survival with functional organ preservation. In the era of personalized medicine, we review the evidence supporting an individualized treatment approach, in particular case selection for radical radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaista Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
244
|
Renal medullary carcinoma: case report of an aggressive malignancy with near-complete response to dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin chemotherapy. Case Rep Oncol Med 2014; 2014:615895. [PMID: 25215253 PMCID: PMC4156985 DOI: 10.1155/2014/615895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Accepted: 08/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy affecting young individuals with sickle cell trait. Renal medullary carcinoma commonly presents with advanced or metastatic disease and is associated with a rapidly progressive clinical course and an extremely short overall survival measured in weeks to few months. Due to the rarity of RMC, there is no proven effective therapy and patients are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. We report near-complete radiological and pathological response in a patient treated with dose-dense MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) chemotherapy. The patient underwent consolidation nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and had a 16-month progression-free survival, one of the longest reported in patients with RMC.
Collapse
|
245
|
Ramos JD, Cheng HH, Yu EY. Long-term survival in bone-predominant metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014; 12:e241-4. [PMID: 25160520 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D Ramos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Balar AV, Milowsky MI. Cytotoxic and DNA-targeted therapy in urothelial cancer: have we squeezed the lemon enough? Cancer 2014; 121:179-87. [PMID: 25091501 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Urothelial cancer has long been known as a chemotherapy-sensitive disease. However, clinical trial data to date suggest a plateau to the magnitude of benefit from cytotoxic therapy alone. In spite of level 1 evidence supporting cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial cancer, underuse prevails among patients with localized disease and only a modest survival benefit exists in the metastatic setting, although trials have consistently demonstrated that there is a subset of patients who clearly benefit. Recent comprehensive genomic profiling has identified a high prevalence of actionable genomic alterations as well as other potential targets yet to be fully understood. Modern clinical trials must now focus on identifying predictive biomarkers to select those patients who will benefit most from cytotoxic chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, or potentially both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun V Balar
- Genitourinary Cancers Program, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
247
|
Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits JH, Viterbo R, Trabulsi EJ, Ross EA, Greenberg RE, Chen DYT, Lallas CD, Wong YN, Lin J, Kutikov A, Dotan E, Brennan TA, Palma N, Dulaimi E, Mehrazin R, Boorjian SA, Kelly WK, Uzzo RG, Hudes GR. Accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin is safe, effective, and efficient neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study with molecular correlates of response and toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1895-901. [PMID: 24821881 PMCID: PMC4050203 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.2465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); however, it is infrequently adopted in practice because of concerns regarding toxicity and delay to cystectomy. We hypothesized that three cycles of neoadjuvant accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (AMVAC) would be safe, shorten the time to surgery, and yield similar pathologic complete response (pT0) rates compared with historical controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cT2-T4a and N0-N1 MIBC were eligible and received three cycles of AMVAC with pegfilgrastim followed by radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. The primary end point was pT0 rate. Telomere length (TL) and p53 mutation status were correlated with response and toxicity. RESULTS Forty-four patients were accrued; 60% had stage III to IV disease; median age was 64 years. Forty patients were evaluable for response, with 15 (38%; 95% CI, 23% to 53%) showing pT0 at cystectomy, meeting the primary end point of the study. Another six patients (14%) were downstaged to non-muscle invasive disease. Most (82%) experienced only grade 1 to 2 treatment-related toxicities. There were no grade 3 or 4 renal toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. One patient developed metastases and thus did not undergo cystectomy; all others (n = 43) proceeded to cystectomy within 8 weeks after last chemotherapy administration. Median time from start of chemotherapy to cystectomy was 9.7 weeks. TL and p53 mutation did not predict response or toxicity. CONCLUSION AMVAC is well tolerated and results in similar pT0 rates with 6 weeks of treatment compared with standard 12-week regimens. Further analysis is ongoing to ascertain whether molecular alterations in tumor samples can predict response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Plimack
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Jean H Hoffman-Censits
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rosalia Viterbo
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric A Ross
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Richard E Greenberg
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David Y T Chen
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yu-Ning Wong
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jianqing Lin
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Timothy A Brennan
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Norma Palma
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Essel Dulaimi
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gary R Hudes
- Elizabeth R. Plimack, Rosalia Viterbo, Eric A. Ross, Richard E. Greenberg, David Y.T. Chen, Yu-Ning Wong, Alexander Kutikov, Efrat Dotan, Essel Dulaimi, Reza Mehrazin, Robert G. Uzzo, and Gary R. Hudes, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health; Jean H. Hoffman-Censits, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas, Jianqing Lin, and William Kevin Kelly, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Timothy A. Brennan and Norma Palma, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and Stephen A. Boorjian, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Choueiri TK, Jacobus S, Bellmunt J, Qu A, Appleman LJ, Tretter C, Bubley GJ, Stack EC, Signoretti S, Walsh M, Steele G, Hirsch M, Sweeney CJ, Taplin ME, Kibel AS, Krajewski KM, Kantoff PW, Ross RW, Rosenberg JE. Neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin with pegfilgrastim support in muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: pathologic, radiologic, and biomarker correlates. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1889-94. [PMID: 24821883 PMCID: PMC7057274 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.4785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In advanced urothelial cancer, treatment with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) results in a high response rate, less toxicity, and few dosing delays. We explored the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ddMVAC with pegfilgrastim support in muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (MIUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with cT2-cT4, N0-1, M0 MIUC were enrolled. Four cycles of ddMVAC were administered, followed by radical cystectomy. The primary end point was pathologic response (PaR) defined by pathologic downstaging to ≤ pT1N0M0. The study used Simon's optimal two-stage design to evaluate null and alternative hypotheses of PaR rate of 35% versus 55%. Secondary end points included toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), radiologic response (RaR), and biomarker correlates, including ERCC1. RESULTS Between December 2008 and April 2012, 39 patients (cT2N0, 33%; cT3N0, 18%; cT4N0, 3%; cT2-4N1, 43%; unspecified, 3%) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 2 years. Overall, 49% (80% CI, 38 to 61) achieved PaR of ≤ pT1N0M0, and we concluded this regimen was effective. High-grade (grade ≥ 3) toxicities were observed in 10% of patients, with no neutropenic fevers or treatment-related death. One-year DFS was 89% versus 67% for patients who achieved PaR compared with those who did not (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 8.1; P = .08) and 86% versus 62% for patients who achieved RaR compared with those who did not (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 12.5; P = .009). We found no association between serum tumor markers or ERCC1 expression with response or survival. CONCLUSION In patients with MIUC, neoadjuvant ddMVAC was well tolerated and resulted in significant pathologic and radiologic downstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni K Choueiri
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Susanna Jacobus
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Angela Qu
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leonard J Appleman
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christopher Tretter
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Glenn J Bubley
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edward C Stack
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Meghara Walsh
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Graeme Steele
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michelle Hirsch
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Katherine M Krajewski
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert W Ross
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Toni K. Choueiri, Susanna Jacobus, Joaquim Bellmunt, Angela Qu, Edward C. Stack, Sabina Signoretti, Meghara Walsh, Graeme Steele, Michelle Hirsch, Christopher J. Sweeney, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Adam S. Kibel, Katherine M. Krajewski, Philip W. Kantoff, Robert W. Ross, and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Christopher Tretter, Lahey Clinic, Burlington; Glenn J. Bubley, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Leonard J. Appleman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Necchi A, Giannatempo P, Lo Vullo S, Farè E, Raggi D, Nicolai N, Piva L, Biasoni D, Torelli T, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Maffezzini M, Mariani L, Salvioni R. Postchemotherapy lymphadenectomy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term efficacy and implications for trial design. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014; 13:80-86.e1. [PMID: 25027186 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Revised: 05/03/2014] [Accepted: 06/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The contribution of postchemotherapy pelvic (PLND) or retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) on survival in patients with advanced and metastatic UC is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 1986 and May 2012, 157 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC received first-line chemotherapy consisting of mMVAC (modified methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin), according to our policy. Patients with subdiaphragmatic nodal disease and/or local recurrence only and who experienced at least stable disease (SD) were selected. Fifty-nine patients were identified, 28 of whom underwent surgery, 31 started consolidation chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy or observation. The prognostic effect of candidate factors on survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS A total of 14 PLND and 14 RPLND patients were identified after they had achieved a complete response (CR; n = 7) or a partial response (PR) and SD (n = 21). Median follow-up was 88 months (interquartile range, 24-211 months). Median PFS was 18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-not estimated) and 11 (95% CI, 5-19) months, respectively, in favor of the surgical cohort and curves were statistically different (log-rank test, P = .009). In multivariate analysis, postchemotherapy surgery was significantly prognostic for PFS and OS and response to chemotherapy (PR and SD vs. CR) was prognostic for PFS and trended to significance for OS. A model including these 2 factors showed bootstrap-corrected Harrel C statistics for PFS and OS of 0.65 and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSION In well selected patients with UC like those who achieved a clinical benefit with chemotherapy and had nodal metastatic disease, there was a survival advantage in removal of disease residuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lo Vullo
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Farè
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Piva
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Biasoni
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tullio Torelli
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Maffezzini
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Mariani
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvioni
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
250
|
Necchi A, Mariani L, Giannatempo P, Raggi D, Farè E, Nicolai N, Piva L, Biasoni D, Catanzaro M, Torelli T, Stagni S, Maffezzini M, Pizzocaro G, De Braud FG, Gianni AM, Salvioni R. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Modified (Simplified) MVAC (Methotrexate/Vinblastine/Doxorubicin/Cisplatin) as Frontline Therapy for Unresectable or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014; 12:203-209.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 11/15/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|