Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial

Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, T790M, and clinical trials

Tumours with sensitizing mutations in the EGFR gene constitute a distinct molecular subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancers (nsclcs) that benefit from precision medicine. First- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis) are recommended as upfront therapy for EGFR-mutated advanced nsclc and, compared with chemotherapy, have resulted in superior progression-free survival, improved tumour response rates, and improved quality of life. However, resistance inevitably develops, and the third-generation tki osimertinib has been approved to target the gatekeeper EGFR mutation T790M, which is responsible for resistance in 60% of cases. Multiple drivers of tki resistance have now been identified, and many new drugs are in development. With respect to this rapidly evolving field, our review highlights the current status of treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nsclc, focusing especially on identified causes of resistance, challenges, and clinical trials aiming to improve outcomes in this patient population.

Cost-effectiveness and safety of the molecular targeted drugs afatinib, gefitinib and erlotinib as first-line treatments for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are standard first-line treatments for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The present study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of using erlotinib, afatinib or gefitinib. The safety of EGFR-TKIs was also investigated. Expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib. Literature was collected to obtain the necessary clinical information for calculating the probability and the validity of each chemotherapy. Median survival time (MST) was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated using expected costs and MSTs for the three regimens. The cost-effectiveness ratio per month was JPY 386,859.4/MST for afatinib, JPY 264,788.7/MST for gefitinib and JPY 397,039.9/MST for erlotinib. Significant differences were observed between the three groups (p<0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of gefitinib compared with afatinib per month was JPY 122,070.7/MST. The ICER of gefitinib compared with erlotinib was JPY -69,605.9/MST. Adverse effects of Grade 3 and higher, including diarrhoea (28.6%) and paronychia (14.3%) were observed in the afatinib treatment group. Paronychia (23.1%) was observed in the erlotinib treatment group, while none were observed in the gefitinib treatment group. These findings demonstrate that gefitinib is more cost effective in comparison with the afatinib and erlotinib regimens, although the afatinib and erlotinib regimens were well-tolerated and produce sufficient effects.

EGFR-TKIs in non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on clinical pharmacology and mechanisms of resistance

The clinical introduction of EGFR-TKIs within the oncologic armamentarium has changed the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) creating widespread expectations both in patients and clinicians. However, several gaps in current understanding leave open important questions regarding the use of these drugs in clinical practice. For instance, there is uncertainty in regard to which EGFR-TKI should be given first in naive patients with EGFR-driven malignancies since different generations of drugs are available with different pharmacological profiles. Furthermore, acquired drug resistance may limit the therapeutic potential of EGFR-TKIs and the choice of the best treatment strategy after first-line treatment failure is still debated. This review article is aimed at describing the pharmacological properties of EGFR-TKIs and the current treatment options for NSCLC patients who develop acquired resistance. This information might be useful to design new rational and more effective pharmacological strategies in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

First-Line Treatment in EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Is There a Best Option?

First generation or second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently the standard of care for the first-line management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating mutations within the kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (1, 2). Resistance to targeted therapy can develop after 9–11 months (3–8). Third generation inhibitors were developed to target the EGFR T790M clone, which is the most common dominant second site resistance mutation after first or second generation inhibitors. Osimertinib received full FDA approval for the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC based on a phase III study comparing the compound to chemotherapy. Recent data demonstrates an important impact for osimertinib in the front-line space based on results comparing the compound to first-generation erlotinib or gefitinib therapy.

The Efficacy and Toxicity of Gefitinib in Treating Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis of 19 Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib with other commonly used drugs in different treatment settings and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status.

Methods: Nineteen randomize clinical trials (RCTs) of 6,554 patients with NSCLC were pooled in this meta-analysis by random-effects or fixed-effects model, whichever is proper.

Results: In first-line therapy, gefitinib showed higher odds than chemotherapy (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.20-4.01), but less than other targeted therapies (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88). As non-first-line therapy, the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were similar between gefitinib and controls (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.93-1.08; HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.72-1.15), respectively. With the regard to toxicity, the incidences of dry skin, rash and pruritus were higher in gefitinib compared with controls, while gefitinib significantly reduced the incidence of hematologic toxicity.

Conclusion: Gefitinib might be more efficient than chemotherapy, but less efficient than other targeted therapies in ORR, especially in EGFR mutation-positive patients. Gefitinib can decrease the odds of hematologic toxicity compared to controls. Future studies, especially those with EGFR mutation-positive patients, will be needed to confirm our findings.

Afatinib as First-line Treatment of Older Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of the LUX-Lung 3, LUX-Lung 6, and LUX-Lung 7 Trials

BACKGROUND

Afatinib is approved in the US, Europe, and several other regions for first-line treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm⁺) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with advanced EGFRm⁺ NSCLC were randomized to afatinib (40 mg/d) versus cisplatin/pemetrexed (LUX-Lung 3 [LL3]) or cisplatin/gemcitabine (LUX-Lung 6 [LL6]), or versus gefitinib (250 mg/d; LUX-Lung 7 [LL7]). We report subgroup analyses according to age, including 65 years or older versus younger than 65 years (preplanned; LL3/LL6) and additional cutoffs up to 75 years and older (exploratory; LL7). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 134 of 345 (39%) and 86 of 364 (24%) patients aged 65 years and older in LL3 and LL6, median PFS was improved with afatinib versus chemotherapy (LL3: hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-1.03]; LL6: HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07-0.39]). Afatinib significantly improved OS versus chemotherapy in elderly patients with Del19⁺ NSCLC in LL3 (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.19-0.80]). Among the 40 of 319 patients (13%) aged 75 years or older in LL7, median PFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.33-1.44]) favored afatinib, consistent with the overall population. Afatinib-associated AEs in older patients were consistent with the overall populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroup analyses of the LL3, LL6, and LL7 trials show that afatinib is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with EGFRm⁺ NSCLC, independent of age.

Afatinib in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC patients who progressed following prior gefitinib or erlotinib: Compassionate use program in Korea

INTRODUCTION

Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, approved for first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated experience of afatinib within a compassionate use program (CUP).

METHODS

The afatinib CUP was an open-label, multicenter, single-arm program in Korea. We enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC and who had received at least one line of previous cytotoxic chemotherapy and previous EGFR TKI treatment with either an EGFR mutation or documented clinical benefit. The starting dose of afatinib was 50 mg once daily.

RESULTS

From August 2011 to September 2014, 332 patients received at least one dose of afatinib. Most patients were registered in the CUP for fourth- or fifth-line treatment with afatinib. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.1% of patients, including 29.8% with serious AEs. The most common AEs (all grades) were diarrhea (90.1%) and skin rash (62.0%). Dose reductions occurred in 60.5% of patients and discontinuations due to AEs were reported in 11.1% of patients. The response rate and median time to treatment failure (TTF) were 27.4% and 3.3 months (CI 95%, 2.8-3.8 months), respectively, in this highly pretreated population. In subgroup analysis, ECOG PS 0 or 1 and immediate pretreatment with pemetrexed monotherapy or a platinum doublet were associated with a longer TTF for afatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

No additional or unexpected safety concerns were observed, and afatinib demonstrated moderate antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib in a real-world setting.

Sleeve lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant afatinib

Afatinib, the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been postulated to be associated with improved inhibition of EGFR-dependent tumor growth compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present a case of lung adenocarcinoma (cT3N0M0) treated with neoadjuvant afatinib and sleeve lobectomy. Because of the location of the tumor, reduced FEV1 value, and the presence of EGFR mutation, the patient was planned to be prescribed afatinib (30 mg daily) for 3 weeks as neoadjuvant therapy and underwent sleeve lobectomy to avoid pneumonectomy as much as possible. Although the patient presented with grade 3 diarrhea and dose reduction of afatinib to 20 mg daily was needed, several image findings showed a partial response of the tumor on Day 20. Oral administration of afatinib was discontinued on Day 22. A right upper sleeve lobectomy combined with partial resection of lower lobe was performed after oral administration of afatinib on Day 24. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful and she has been free of recurrence for 26 months. This strategy could reduce the risk of pneumonectomy with acceptable side effects. The treatment, clinical course and pathological findings of the patient are discussed.

The clinical features of squamous cell lung carcinoma with sensitive EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

The process of selecting patients on the basis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations would likely result in a patient population with greater sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, EGFR mutation status is not routinely examined in patients with squamous cell lung cancer (Sq) because of the low incidence of EGFR mutations and the poor clinical response to EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of patients at our hospital with Sq who carried EGFR-TKI-sensitive EGFR mutations and assessed their responses to EGFR-TKIs.

RESULTS

EGFR mutation status was tested in 23 of 441 patients with Sq (5.2%) admitted to our hospital during the study period. An EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion 3, L858R 2) was identified in five of the 23 patients (21.7%), all of whom were female never-smokers. Of these five patients, four (4/9; 44.4%) were in the normal lung group, one (1/12; 8.3%) was in the emphysematous lung group, and none (0/2; 0%) in the fibrotic lung group. Two of these five patients with the EGFR mutation received gefitinib and two received afatinib. Although the two patients who were treated with gefitinib did not respond well to treatment (stable disease, 1 patient; progressive disease, 1 patient), the two patients who were treated with afatinib showed a good response (partial response, 2 patients).

CONCLUSION

The administration of afatinib to Sq patients after selecting patients using the EGFR mutation test based on their underlying pulmonary disease and smoking status would likely result in a population with a greater sensitivity to afatinib.

A phase I study of afatinib for patients aged 75 or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

This phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of afatinib for phase II trial in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The study used a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Patients aged 75 years or older with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled. The doses of afatinib, which were given once daily, were planned as follows: level 1, 20 mg/day; level 2, 30 mg/day; level 3, 40 mg/day. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematologic, persistent grade > 2 diarrhea for > 2 days despite concomitant medications or grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity. DLT was evaluated during day 1-28. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Patient characteristics were: male/female 3/12; median age 79 (range 75-87); PS 0/1, 2/13. Six patients have been treated at levels 1 and 3, and three patients at level 2. At level 1, one of six patients experienced grade 3 rush, grade 3 anorexia, and grade 3 infection as DLTs. At level 2, none of three patients experienced a DLT. At level 3, two patients developed grade 3 diarrhea, one of whom also experienced grade 3 anorexia. Most frequent adverse events of any grade were diarrhea, paronychia, rush, and nausea. Most patients at level 2 and 3 required dose reduction in 3 months. MTD was defined as 40 mg/day, and recommended dose for phase II study in elderly patients was 30 mg/day.

Dynamic changes in quality of life after three first-line therapies for EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Three different tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been approved as first-line therapies for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with similar overall survival. This study determined dynamic changes in quality of life (QoL) for patients using these therapies after controlling for potential confounders.

Methods

From 2011 to 2016, we prospectively assessed the utility values and QoL scores of patients using the EuroQol five-dimension and World Health Organization Quality-of-Life - Brief questionnaires. QoL functions after initiation of treatment were estimated using a kernel-smoothing method. Dynamic changes in major determinants were repeatedly assessed for constructing mixed models.

Results

A total of 344 patients were enrolled, with 934 repeated assessments. After controlling for performance status, disease progression, EGFR mutation subtype and other confounders, the mixed models showed significantly lower QoL scores for afatinib versus gefitinib in the physical, psychological and social domains, and 10 facets. The differences seemed to appear 10 months after initiation of treatment. In contrast, there was no significant difference between erlotinib and gefitinib in the scores of all domains and facets.

Conclusion

QoL in patients receiving afatinib seemed to be lower than in those receiving gefitinib. Since the sample sizes in this study were relatively small, more studies are warranted to corroborate these results.

Comparison of the effects of the three major tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

Introduction

Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations have good response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS) when treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these drugs as first-line therapy in such patients are limited.

Results

We analyzed 422 patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line gefitinib (n = 195, 46.2%), erlotinib (n = 123, 29.1%), or afatinib (n = 104, 24.6%). The PFS of the afatinib group was longer (12.2 months) than that of the gefitinib group (9.8 months) (p = 0.035) but similar to that of the erlotinib group (11.4 months) (p = 0.38). In patients without brain metastasis (BM), subgroup analysis showed that the afatinib group had significantly longer PFS (13.1 months) than erlotinib (11.7 months) and gefitinib (9.8 months) groups (p = 0.010). Patients with exon 19 deletions in the afatinib and erlotinib groups had potentially long PFS (p = 0.073). Efficacy of afatinib was similar between the 30 mg and 40 mg arms (median PFS 16.1 months vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.923).

Conclusions

Afatinib may be the optimal EGFR-TKI for advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutations, particularly in the absence of BM. Patients with exon 19 deletions taking afatinib had potentially long PFS. An afatinib dose of 30 and 40 mg has similar effect.

Methods

We conducted this retrospective study at a single medical center from January 2013 to March 2017 and used PFS to evaluate the effectiveness of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations.

Afatinib in advanced NSCLC: a profile of its use

Afatinib [Giotrif^® (EU); Gilotrif^® (USA)] is an orally administered, irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinases that provides an important first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (i.e. EGFR^actMUT+), and an additional treatment option for squamous NSCLC that has progressed following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Relative to gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR^actMUT+ advanced lung adenocarcinoma, afatinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF), but not overall survival (OS). Afatinib also prolonged PFS, but not OS, versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in this setting; however, afatinib improved OS versus chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients with deletions in exon 19. As a second-line treatment for advanced squamous NSCLC, afatinib prolonged PFS and OS compared with erlotinib, regardless of EGFR mutation status. Afatinib had a predictable and manageable tolerability profile.

Turning EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer into a chronic disease: optimal sequential therapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Four epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and osimertinib, are currently available for the management of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with others in development. Although tumors are exquisitely sensitive to these agents, acquired resistance is inevitable. Furthermore, emerging data indicate that first- (erlotinib and gefitinib), second- (afatinib) and third-generation (osimertinib) EGFR TKIs differ in terms of efficacy and tolerability profiles. Therefore, there is a strong imperative to optimize the sequence of TKIs in order to maximize their clinical benefit. Osimertinib has demonstrated striking efficacy as a second-line treatment option in patients with T790M-positive tumors, and also confers efficacy and tolerability advantages over first-generation TKIs in the first-line setting. However, while accrual of T790M is the most predominant mechanism of resistance to erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib, resistance mechanisms to osimertinib have not been clearly elucidated, meaning that possible therapy options after osimertinib failure are not clear. At present, few data comparing sequential regimens in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC are available and prospective clinical trials are required. This article reviews the similarities and differences between EGFR TKIs, and discusses key considerations when assessing optimal sequential therapy with these agents for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Optimizing outcomes in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: which tyrosine kinase inhibitor and when?

Despite the efficacy of standard-of-care EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib, in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, resistance develops, most commonly due to the T790M mutation. Osimertinib showed clinical activity in the treatment of T790M-positive disease following progression on a first-line TKI, and is approved in this setting. Recently, osimertinib improved efficacy versus first-generation TKIs (erlotinib and gefitinib) in the first-line setting. Multiple factors can influence first-line treatment decisions, including subsequent therapy options, presence of brain metastases and tolerability, all of which should be considered in the long-term treatment plan. Further research into treatment sequencing is also needed, to optimize outcomes in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Progress in the Management of Advanced Thoracic Malignancies in 2017

The treatment paradigm of NSCLC underwent a major revolution during the course of 2017. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) brought remarkable improvements in response and overall survival both in unselected pretreated patients and in untreated patients with programmed death ligand 1 expression of 50% or more. Furthermore, compelling preliminary results were reported for new combinations of anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed death ligand 1 agents with chemotherapy or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 inhibitors. The success of the ICIs appeared to extend to patients with SCLC, mesothelioma, or thymic tumors. Furthermore, in SCLC, encouraging activity was reported for an experimental target therapy (rovalpituzumab teserine) and a new chemotherapeutic agent (lurbinectedin). For oncogene-addicted NSCLC, next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (such as osimertinib or alectinib) have demonstrated increased response rates and progression-free survival compared with first-generation TKIs in patients with both EGFR-mutated and ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC. However, because of the lack of mature overall survival data and considering the high efficacy of these drugs in patients with NSCLC previously exposed to first- or second-generation TKIs, definitive conclusions concerning the best treatment sequence cannot yet be drawn. In addition, new oncogenes such as mutant BRAF, tyrosine-protein kinase met gene (MET) and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (HER2), and ret proto-oncogene (RET) rearrangements have joined the list of potential targetable drivers. In conclusion, the field of thoracic oncology is on the verge of a breakthrough that will open up many promising new therapeutic options for physicians and patients. The characterization of biomarkers predictive of sensitivity or resistance to immunotherapy and the identification of the optimal therapeutic combinations (for ICIs) and treatment sequence (for oncogene-addicted NSCLC) represent the toughest upcoming challenges in the domain of thoracic oncology.

Combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly improved in recent years with the incorporation of drugs targeting antiangiogenesis and more specifically genomic alterations such as the EGFR mutations and ALK translocations. However, most patients invariably progress and die. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the pathways involved in tumor-induced immunosuppression have redefined the management of the disease, achieving significant long-lasting responses with manageable safety profiles, regardless of histology. Still, response rates with immunotherapy are deemed suboptimal. Current efforts are focusing on new potential combination strategies with synergistic antitumor activity, using immune checkpoint blockade as a partner for targeted agents. Herein we discuss the available data on the combined use of immunotherapy, including PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, with EGFR and ALK inhibitors and comment on the current status of immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic drugs for molecularly unselected advanced NSCLC.

Are liquid biopsies a surrogate for tissue EGFR testing?

Molecular profiling has changed the treatment landscape in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Accurately identifying the tumours that harbour sensitizing EGFR mutations, the most common targetable molecular alteration, as well as those with acquired resistance mutations (e.g. T790M) on treatment is a high clinical priority. The current clinical gold standard is genotyping of tumour specimens. However, the practical utility of this approach is limited by the lack of available tissue and the potential complications associated with biopsies. With the advent of newer sequencing assays, it has become feasible to assess tumour genomics via a blood sample, termed a 'liquid biopsy'. In this review, we summarize the available techniques for liquid biopsies and their applicability for detecting sensitizing and resistance EGFR mutations and how these results may be used for making treatment decisions.

Gefitinib

Gefitinib is an orally active selective inhibitor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The large randomised phase III IPASS study (gefitinib 250 mg, daily vs carboplatin and paclitaxel) showed a beneficial effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life in selected patient populations under the treatment with gefitinib (HR for TKI 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65-0.85). In the subgroup of patients with EGFR mutation the effect of gefitinib on PFS was notably, PFS HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36-0.64, p < 0.001) and the objective response rate (RR) was 71.2% with gefitinib versus 47.3% with chemotherapy. However no significant difference of overall survival was found. Based on this study gefitinib was approved for the first-line treatment of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitising EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation). Gefitinib is metabolized in the liver. Most of the adverse effects of gefitinib, such as rash, dry skin and diarrhoe, are mild to moderate in severity and are reversible.

Afatinib

Afatinib (BIBW 2992, US: Gilotrif^TM, other countries: Giotrif©) is an irreversible blocker of the ErbB family, acting at the tyrosine kinases of these proteins. In 2013, it was approved by the FDA and the EMA for the treatment of adults with advanced, EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Further investigations for the treatment of many other tumors with afatinib, e.g., HNSCC and breast cancer, are ongoing.

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours harbour activating mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) frequently derive significant clinical and radiographic benefits from treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As such, prospective identification of EGFR mutations is now the standard of care worldwide. However, acquired therapeutic resistance to these agents invariably develops. Over the past 10 years, great strides have been made in defining the molecular mechanisms of EGFR TKI resistance in an effort to design rational strategies to overcome this acquired drug resistance. Approximately 60% of patients with acquired resistance to the EGFR TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib) develop a new mutation within the drug target. This mutation-T790M-has been shown to alter drug binding and enzymatic activity of the mutant EGF receptor. Less common mechanisms of acquired resistance include MET amplification, ERBB2 amplification, transformation to small-cell lung cancer, and others. Here, we present a condensed overview of the literature on EGFR-mutant NSCLC, paying particular attention to mechanisms of drug resistance, recent clinical trial results, and novel strategies for identifying and confronting drug resistance, while also striving to identify gaps in current knowledge. These advances are rapidly altering the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, expanding the armamentarium of available therapies to maximize patient benefit.

Downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 14 by the antitumor miRNA, miR-150-5p, inhibits the aggressiveness of lung squamous cell carcinoma cells

In the present study, in order to elucidate the aggressive nature of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), we investigated the oncogenic RNA networks regulated by antitumor microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) in LUSQ cells. The analysis of our original miRNA expression signatures of human cancers revealed that microRNA‑150‑5p (miR‑150‑5p) was downregulated in various types of cancer, indicating that miR‑150‑5p acts as an antitumor miRNA by targeting several oncogenic genes. Thus, the aims of this study were to investigate the antitumor roles of miR‑150‑5p in LUSQ cells and to identify oncogenes regulated by miR‑150‑5p that are involved in the aggressive behavior of LUSQ. The downregulation of miR‑150‑5p was validated in clinical samples of LUSQ and cell lines (SK-MES‑1 and EBC‑1). The ectopic overexpression of miR‑150‑5p significantly suppressed cancer cell aggressiveness. Comprehensive gene expression analyses revealed that miR‑150‑5p regulated 9 genes in the LUSQ cells. Among these, matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) was found to be a direct target of miR‑150‑5p, as shown by luciferase reporter assay. The knockdown of MMP14 using siRNA against MMP14 (si-MMP14) significantly inhibited cancer cell migration and invasion. The overexpression of MMP14 was detected in clinical specimens of LUSQ by immunohistochemistry. On the whole, these findings suggest that the downregulation of miR‑150‑5p and the overexpression of MMP14 may be deeply involved in the pathogenesis of LUSQ.

Role of afatinib in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma

Lung cancer treatment has considerably changed over the last few years: the identification of druggable oncogenic alterations and innovative immunotherapic approaches granted lung cancer patients the possibility of more efficient and less toxic therapeutic options than chemotherapy. Nowadays, lung squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs) patients have the chance to benefit from novel treatment alternatives, including immune checkpoint blockade and anti-angiogenic agents and, given positive trial results, from afatinib, a second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that irreversibly antagonizes ErbB family tyrosine kinase receptors. Considering the role of the ErbB-signaling cascade in lung SqCC, it is relevant to note that ErbB1 (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]) is overexpressed in 85% of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), particularly in patients with squamous histology, and is associated with poor prognosis. For this reason, EGFR activity has been investigated as a therapeutic strategy in lung SqCC. Even taking into account statistically positive trial results, anti-EGFR approach still remains controversial in unselected/wild-type EGFR lung SqCC patients, as well as the optimal timing and sequencing of all available targeted therapies considering the approval of immunotherapeutic agents. This review analyzes current data about EGFR inhibition in lung SqCC with a specific focus on afatinib in order to elucidate available clinical evidence supporting EGFR targeting in this setting as well as a future management of advanced lung SqCCs in the context of new emerging immunotherapeutic drugs.

Next-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Setting Clarifies Patient Characteristics and Potential Actionability

Enhancements in clinical-grade next-generation sequencing (NGS) have fueled the advancement of precision medicine in the clinical oncology field. Here, we survey the molecular profiles of 1,113 patients with diverse malignancies who successfully underwent clinical-grade NGS (236-404 genes) in an academic tertiary cancer center. Among the individual tumors examined, the majority showed at least one detectable alteration (97.2%). Among 2,045 molecular aberrations was the involvement of 302 distinct genes. The most commonly altered genes were TP53 (47.0%), CDKN2A (18.0%), TERT (17.0%), and KRAS (16.0%), and the majority of patients had tumors that harbored multiple alterations. Tumors displayed a median of four alterations (range, 0-29). Most individuals had at least one potentially actionable alteration (94.7%), with the median number of potentially actionable alterations per patient being 2 (range, 0-13). A total of 1,048 (94.2%) patients exhibited a unique molecular profile, with either genes altered or loci within the gene(s) altered being distinct. Approximately 13% of patients displayed a genomic profile identical to at least one other patient; although genes altered were the same, the affected loci may have differed. Overall, our results underscore the complex heterogeneity of malignancies and argue that customized combination therapies will be essential to optimize cancer treatment regimens. Cancer Res; 77(22); 6313-20. ©2017 AACR.

Beyond ALK and ROS1: RET, NTRK, EGFR and BRAF gene rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer

The discovery of gene rearrangements involving the receptor tyrosine kinase genes ALK and ROS1 has revolutionized management of the subset of non-small cell lung cancers characterized by these alterations. The oncogenic fusion proteins expressed in these tumors drive cancer cell growth and survival, and targeted inhibition of this signaling can lead to dramatic and durable responses in patients. While the best characterized gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involve ALK and ROS1, fusions involving other kinases including RET, NTRK, EGFR and BRAF are now established as additional targetable drivers. Here we review data supporting the roles of these fusions as oncogenic drivers, and the potential for targeting these fusions for improved clinical outcomes. These discoveries should encourage multiplexed molecular profiling of lung cancers using next-generation platforms which identify these gene fusions in order to expand treatment options for patients.

Current Landscape of Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Comprehensive genomic profiling of lung cancers revealed their genetic heterogeneity and complexity and identified numerous targetable oncogenic driver alterations. These molecular profiling efforts have made it possible to exploit the potential of molecularly targeted therapies. Selection of patients for targeted therapies is becoming biomarker-driven, where the oncogenic drivers in patient tumors are first identified, and subsequently patients bearing drug-sensitizing genetic aberrations are matched to the appropriate targeted therapy. Success of this design of clinical trials and practice was first demonstrated in EGFR inhibitor trials in lung cancer and has since been incorporated into subsequent targeted therapy trials including ALK-, ROS1-, and BRAF V600E-targeted therapies. In this review we discuss the current landscape of clinically approved and other promising molecularly targeted approaches for the treatment of lung cancers, the challenges with these approaches, and the strategies that could be deployed to overcome these challenges.

Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We compared its efficacy and safety with that of the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (ARCHER 1050), we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years or ≥20 years in Japan and South Korea) with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC and one EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or Leu858Arg) at 71 academic medical centres and university hospitals in seven countries or special administrative regions. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) or oral gefitinib 250 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion was met. Randomisation, stratified by race and EGFR mutation type, was done with a computer-generated random code assigned by a central interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774721, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients.

FINDINGS

Between May 9, 2013, and March 20, 2015, 452 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive dacomitinib (n=227) or gefitinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 20·3-23·9). Median progression-free survival according to masked independent review was 14·7 months (95% CI 11·1-16·6) in the dacomitinib group and 9·2 months (9·1-11·0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio 0·59, 95% CI 0·47-0·74; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dermatitis acneiform (31 [14%] of 227 patients given dacomitinib vs none of 224 patients given gefitinib), diarrhoea (19 [8%] vs two [1%]), and raised alanine aminotransferase levels (two [1%] vs 19 [8%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 21 (9%) patients given dacomitinib and in ten (4%) patients given gefitinib. Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the dacomitinib group (one related to untreated diarrhoea and one to untreated cholelithases/liver disease) and one in the gefitinib group (related to sigmoid colon diverticulitis/rupture complicated by pneumonia).

INTERPRETATION

Dacomitinib significantly improved progression-free survival over gefitinib in first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC and should be considered as a new treatment option for this population.

FUNDING

SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group and Pfizer.

Oncogenic driver mutations, treatment, and EGFR-TKI resistance in a Caucasian population with non-small cell lung cancer: survival in clinical practice

Introduction

Oncogenic driver mutations activating EGFR, ALK, or BRAF in NSCLC predict sensitivity to specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We provide data on prevalence, treatment and survival of driver-mutation positive NSCLC in a predominantly Caucasian population in routine clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2006-2015 with an EGFR-test result were included (n=265). Testing for EGFR, ALK, or BRAF was performed if specific TKI therapy was considered. Case-control analyses of overall survival (OS) comparing driver-mutation positive and negative patients were performed.

Results

44 sensitizing EGFR mutations (17%), 8 ALK translocations (7%, n=111) and 3 BRAF mutations (8%, n=39) were detected in adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. We did not find mutations in tumors without an adenocarcinoma-component. More than 90% of inoperable driver-mutation positive patients received TKI-therapy. Case-control analysis revealed improved OS of driver-mutation positive patients (39.6 vs. 19.4 months, HR 0.51). OS was improved in stage IV patients but not in stage I-III patients.

OS of EGFR-TKI treated patients was similar for 1^st and 2^nd-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Patients not treated with EGFR-TKI had no benefit in OS. Re-biopsies obtained at progression revealed an EGFR-T790M mutation in 73% (n=11). These patients responded to the 3^rd-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib.

Discussion

Testing guided by predictive clinical parameters resulted in twice as high rates of mutation-positive patients than expected, and TKI treatment resulted in a strong long-term OS advantage.

Conclusion

Testing for driver mutations is feasible in routine clinical practice, and identifies patients who benefit from TKI-therapy. OS compares favorably with OS in clinical studies.

EGFR TKI as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

After the discovery of activating mutations in EGFR, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been introduced into the first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A series of studies have shown that EGFR TKI monotherapy as first-line treatment can benefit NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR mutations. Besides, combination strategies based on EGFR TKIs in the first line treatment have also been proved to delay the occurrence of resistance. In this review, we summarize the scientific literature and evidence of EGFR TKIs as first-line therapy from the first-generation EGFR TKIs to conceptually proposed fourth-generation EGFR TKI, and also recommend the application of monotherapy and combination therapies of the EGFR-based targeted therapy with other agents such as chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic drugs and immunecheckpoint inhibitors.

Scientific Advances in Thoracic Oncology 2016

Lung cancer care is rapidly changing with advances in genomic testing, the development of next-generation targeted kinase inhibitors, and the continued broad study of immunotherapy in new settings and potential combinations. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Journal of Thoracic Oncology publish this annual update to help readers keep pace with these important developments. Experts in thoracic cancer and care provide focused updates across multiple areas, including prevention and early detection, molecular diagnostics, pathology and staging, surgery, adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for NSCLC, SCLC, and mesothelioma. Quality and value of care and perspectives on the future of lung cancer research and treatment have also been included in this concise review.

Acquisition of the T790M resistance mutation during afatinib treatment in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

The T790M secondary mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene accounts for 50% to 60% of cases of resistance to the first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib. The prevalence of T790M in EGFR mutation–positive patients who acquire resistance to the irreversible, second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib has remained unclear, however. We here determined the frequency of T790M acquisition at diagnosis of progressive disease in patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKI. Among 56 enrolled patients, 37 individuals underwent molecular analysis at rebiopsy. Of these 37 patients, 16 individuals (43.2%) had acquired T790M, including 11/21 patients (52.4%) with an exon 19 deletion of EGFR and 5/13 patients (38.5%) with L858R. None of three patients with an uncommon EGFR mutation harbored T790M. T790M was detected in 14/29 patients (48.3%) with a partial response to afatinib, 1/4 patients (25%) with stable disease, and 1/4 patients (25%) with progressive disease as the best response. Median progression-free survival after initiation of afatinib treatment was significantly (P = 0.043) longer in patients who acquired T790M (11.9 months; 95% confidence interval, 8.7–15.1) than in those who did not (4.5 months; 95% confidence interval, 2.0–7.0). Together, our results show that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with afatinib as first-line EGFR-TKI acquire T790M at the time of progression at a frequency similar to that for patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. They further underline the importance of rebiopsy for detection of T790M in afatinib-treated patients.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, with a Focus on Afatinib

Somatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are present in around 50% of Asian patients and in 10–15% of Caucasian patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of adenocarcinoma histology. The first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib have demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates but not overall survival (OS) benefit in randomized phase III trials when compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. All patients treated with EGFR-TKIs will eventually develop acquired resistance to these agents. Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, has shown in two randomly controlled trials in patients with EGFR-activating mutations, a significant improvement in PFS and health-related quality of life when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy. Afatinib improved OS in patients with Del19 mutations. In patients having progressed on first-generation EGFR-TKIs, afatinib did lead to a clinical benefit. A randomly controlled trial showed that PFS was significantly superior with afatinib vs. erlotinib in patients with squamous NSCLC in the second-line setting. A phase IIb trial comparing afatinib and gefitinib in first-line EGFR positive NSCLC showed significantly improved PFS with afatinib but OS was not significantly improved.

Current Treatment Algorithms for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell, Non-Squamous Lung Cancer

The treatment paradigm for metastatic non-small cell, non-squamous lung cancer is continuously evolving due to new treatment options and our increasing knowledge of molecular signal pathways. As a result of treatments becoming more efficacious and more personalized, survival for selected groups of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is increasing. In this paper, three algorithms will be presented for treating patients with metastatic non-squamous, NSCLC. These include treatment algorithms for NSCLC patients whose tumors have EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements, or wild-type/wild-type tumors. As the world of immunotherapy continues to evolve quickly, a future algorithm will also be presented.

Treatment in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: How to Block the Receptor and overcome Resistance Mechanisms

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and the parallel development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have radically changed the therapeutic management strategies. Currently, erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib are all approved as standard first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, despite the proven efficacy, some EGFR-mutated NSCLCs do not respond to EGFR TKIs, while some patients, after a favorable and prolonged response to EGFR TKIs, inevitably progress within about 10-14 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent mechanisms, activation of alternative pathways, or phenotypic transformation can cause the resistance to EGFR TKIs. The exon 20 p.Thr790Met point mutation (T790M) is responsible for about 60% of cases of resistance when progression occurs. A third-generation TKI, osimertinib, improved outcome in patients harboring T790M after first- and second-generation TKI treatment. However, resistance develops even after treatment with third-generation drugs. To date, the Cys797Ser (C797S) mutation in exon 20 of EGFR is the most well-known resistance mutation after osimertinib. Fourth-generation TKIs are already under development. Nevertheless, additional information is needed to better understand and effectively overcome resistance. The aim of this review is to report recent advances and future perspectives in the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, highlighting the resistance mechanisms that underlie disease progression.