Hierarchic Interaction of Factors Associated With Liver Decompensation After Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop nomograms for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using deep learning analysis of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary (HBP) MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and hepatectomy for HCC between 2016 and 2020 at two referral centers. Using a deep learning algorithm, volumes and signal intensities of whole non-tumor liver, expected remnant liver, and spleen were measured on HBP images. Two multivariable logistic regression models were formulated to predict PHLF, defined and graded by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery: one based on whole non-tumor liver measurements (whole liver model) and the other on expected remnant liver measurements (remnant liver model). The models were presented as nomograms and a web-based calculator. Discrimination performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), with internal validation through 1000-fold bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The study included 1760 patients (1395 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 60 ± 10 years), with 137 (7.8%) developing PHLF. Nomogram predictors included sex, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, prothrombin time international normalized ratio, platelets, extent of liver resection, and MRI variables derived from the liver volume, liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio, and spleen volume. The whole liver and the remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively) and symptomatic (grades B and C) PHLF (optimism-corrected AUC of 0.81 and 0.84, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Nomograms based on deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced HBP images accurately stratify the risk of PHLF.

KEY POINTS

Question Can PHLF be predicted by integrating clinical and MRI-derived volume and functional variables through deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI? Findings Whole liver and remnant liver nomograms demonstrated strong predictive performance for PHLF with the optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.78 and 0.81, respectively. Clinical relevance These nomograms can effectively stratify the risk of PHLF, providing a valuable tool for treatment decisions regarding hepatectomy for HCC.

Current insights into anaesthesia and critical care management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Multifaceted implications for the anaesthesiologist and intensive care physician

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is on the rise worldwide, due to the increasing prevalence of liver diseases associated with metabolic dysfunction and better management of cirrhosis and its complications. The diversification of HCC treatments has recently increased, with the choice of strategy based on HCC characteristics, liver function and comorbidities. The combination of new therapies has transformed the prognosis, with up to 70% survival at 5 years.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to analyse the most recent data on preoperative evaluation, peri-operative anaesthetic management of liver resection, liver transplantation and other types of procedures, and to highlight the multidisciplinary aspect of such management.

MAIN FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

The importance of preanaesthetic evaluation will depend largely on the procedure proposed, associated co-morbidities and the stage of liver disease. This assessment should verify stabilisation of all comorbidities, and evaluate the degree of portal hypertension, cirrhosis severity and sarcopenia. Liver resection and liver transplantation for HCC present specific surgical challenges, and minimally invasive techniques improve recovery. Nonsurgical procedures considered as therapeutic (ablation) or standby (regional embolisation) are diverse, and all expose patients to specific intra-anaesthetic complications, sometimes requiring intensive care management. Peri-operative anaesthetic strategies deployed in the management of liver resection or nonsurgical procedures involve specific management of fluids, coagulation, narcosis and analgesia, which can impact on patients' overall, and cancer prognosis. Lastly, new down-staging strategies combining several types of procedure and possibly immunotherapy, also call for collegial reflection on posthepatic transplant immunosuppression, which must remain tailored to each individual patient.

Multivariable prognostic models for post-hepatectomy liver failure: An updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

Partial hepatectomy continues to be the primary treatment approach for liver tumors, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the most critical life-threatening complication following surgery.

AIM

To comprehensively review the PHLF prognostic models developed in recent years and objectively assess the risk of bias in these models.

METHODS

This review followed the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Three databases were searched from November 2019 to December 2022, and references as well as cited literature in all included studies were manually screened in March 2023. Based on the defined inclusion criteria, articles on PHLF prognostic models were selected, and data from all included articles were extracted by two independent reviewers. The PROBAST was used to evaluate the quality of each included article.

RESULTS

A total of thirty-four studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Nearly all of the models (32/34, 94.1%) were developed and validated exclusively using private data sources. Predictive variables were categorized into five distinct types, with the majority of studies (32/34, 94.1%) utilizing multiple types of data. The area under the curve for the training models included ranged from 0.697 to 0.956. Analytical issues resulted in a high risk of bias across all studies included.

CONCLUSION

The validation performance of the existing models was substantially lower compared to the development models. All included studies were evaluated as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to issues within the analytical domain. The progression of modeling technology, particularly in artificial intelligence modeling, necessitates the use of suitable quality assessment tools.

Synchronous Portal Vein Embolization of Terminal Branches with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Prior to Planned Major Hepatectomy for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Terminal branches portal vein embolization (TBPVE) is a novel technical modification. The clinical impact of synchronous TBPVE with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) before planned major hepatectomy in hepatitis B virus (HBV) related HCC is still unknown.

METHOD

From November 2016 to December 2021, the study enrolled 115 patients with HBV-related HCC who were scheduled for major hepatectomy but had insufficient FLR. Patients were grouped according to whether they received TBPVE combined with TACE (the TBPVE group, n = 62) or PVE combined with TACE (the PVE group, n = 53). We compared the outcomes of the procedures and the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who subsequently underwent major hepatectomy between the groups.

RESULTS

FLR volume increment and degree of hypertrophy were significantly higher in the TBPVE group than in the PVE group (P≤0.003). FLR proliferation was pronounced remarkably within the first two weeks after TBPVE synchronous with TACE, the kinetic growth rates were 17.4 (12.7-21.9) mL/day and 6.9 (4.1-11.1) mL/day respectively. 54 patients in the TBPVE group and 41 patients in the PVE group finally underwent major hepatectomies. Pringle's maneuver time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and postoperative hospital stays were less in the TBPVE group (P<0.05). Disease-free survival (DFS) rates were better in the TBPVE group than in the PVE group (P=0.042).

CONCLUSION

TBPVE synchronous with TACE induced safe and rapid FLR hypertrophy with satisfactory efficacy in initially unresectable HBV-related HCC patients improved the planned major hepatectomy resectability rate and has better DFS.

Portal flow modulation by splenic artery ligation to prevent posthepatectomy liver failure: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure is a serious clinical issue with high mortality, similar in pathophysiology to small-for-size syndrome seen in liver transplantation. This study evaluates the efficacy of splenic artery ligation in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with portal venous pressure >15 mm Hg after hepatectomy.

METHODS

This single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted from May 2019 to November 2023. Eligible participants were patients scheduled for open hepatectomy for any indication. Patients with a portal venous pressure >15 mm Hg were randomized into splenic artery ligation and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcomes were posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (International Study group of Liver Surgery criteria), and secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, comprehensive complication index, and ascites volume.

RESULTS

The study was terminated early, before reaching the calculated sample size, because the primary outcome in the intervention group demonstrated statistically significant results. Of the 92 patients, 36 had elevated portal venous pressure, which was associated with greater rates of posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (41.67% vs 3.57%, P < .001), increased ascites volume (5,340 mL vs 1,055 mL, P < .001), and a greater comprehensive complication index (20.90 vs 8.70, P < .001). In the randomized subset, splenic artery ligation significantly reduced portal venous pressure and the portal venous pressure-central venous pressure gradient compared with both presplenic artery ligation values and the control group and significantly lowered the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (16.67% vs 66.67%, P = .006), comprehensive complication index (8.70 vs 20.90, P = .034). Splenic artery ligation was identified as an independent factor in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure (adjusted relative risk, 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Splenic artery ligation is effective in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with high portal venous pressure after hepatectomy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy

The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.

Impact of parenchymal transection techniques on intraoperative blood loss during liver resection in a porcine model of elevated central venous pressure: A comparative study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Liver resection is the standard treatment for resectable liver tumors and metastases. However, mortality and morbidity remain significant concerns, particularly for patients with chronically elevated central venous pressure (CVP), which increases perioperative complication risks. The optimal parenchymal transection technique for these patients remains unclear, necessitating further research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study established an innovative porcine model for high-CVP liver resection. Animals were divided into two groups: a control group (CVP ≤ 5 mmHg, low-CVP) and an intervention group (CVP ≥ 10 mmHg, high-CVP). A left lateral liver resection was performed using three parenchymal transection techniques: clamp-crush (CC), harmonic scalpel (HS), and stapler (ST). The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, while secondary endpoints included transection time and bile leakage.

RESULTS

No differences were found for blood loss or transection time among the low-CVP subgroups. In the high-CVP group, the HS and ST techniques were associated with significantly reduced blood loss and faster transection times than the CC technique. While transection times for the HS and ST were similar between the low- and high-CVP groups, they were significantly longer with the CC technique in the high-CVP group. The incidence of bile leakage was comparable across all three techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates superior outcomes for HS and ST techniques in high-CVP liver resections. Insights from this large animal model provide a basis for investigating optimal transection techniques for chronically elevated CVP, bridging preclinical research and clinical practice.

Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with decompensated cirrhosis remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 315 patients with decompensated cirrhosis and HCC who underwent MWA or RFA were recruited. Recurrence beyond the Milan criteria (RBM), local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and complications were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the overall liver-related complication rates were 12.1 % in the current study. The cumulative RBM rates were lower in patients treated with MWA compared to those treated with RFA (21.9 % vs. 23.4 % at 1 year; 42.3 % vs. 66.8 % at 5 years; p = 0.016). In addition, lower cumulative rates of LTP were found in patients treated with MWA compared to those treated with RFA (6.2 % vs. 19.9 % at 1 year; 14.7 % vs. 27.8 % at 3 years; p = 0.032). The OS rates at 1 and 5 years were 89.9 % and 58.9 % in the MWA group, and 80.7 %, and 38.9 % in the RFA group, respectively (p = 0.105).

CONCLUSION

HCC patients with decompensated cirrhosis can undergo MWA or RFA with acceptable mortality, morbidity and liver-rated complications rates. MWA demonstrates superiority over RFA in tumor control.

Recurrence and survival after robotic vs laparoscopic liver resection in very-early to early-stage (BCLC 0-A) hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Robotic (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provide similar short-term outcomes, but data focused on recurrence and survival are still lacking. We hypothesized non-inferior oncologic results of RLR compared to LLR for HCC of stage BCLC 0-A.

METHODS

RLRs and LLRs on patients with HCC of stage BCLC 0-A and preserved liver function (Child A or B if cirrhosis) were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were incidence, pattern, and treatment of recurrences.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, two groups (RLR = 68; LLR = 68) of patients with similar characteristics, liver function and HCC features were obtained: median age 71-years, males 73.5%, underlying cirrhosis 91.2% (Child A, 96.8%, MELD ≤ 9, 96.0%), portal hypertension 22.1%, single-HCC 90.4%. Two- and 5-year RFS were 78.0 vs 59.0% and 54.0 vs 53.0% (p = 0.107), while OS was 97.0 vs 90.0% and 87.0 vs 90.0% (p = 0.951) for RLR vs LLR, respectively. Incidence of HCC recurrence was similar (35.3 vs 39.7%; p = 0.723). Recurrences developed mostly within the liver (29.4 vs 30.9%; p = 1.000) and within 2 years after hepatectomy (19.1 vs 32.4%, p = 0.116) in RLR vs LLRs. Curative-intent treatment of recurrences did not differ (liver transplantation 19.6%, redo-resection 15.7%, locoregional treatments 52.9%) except for a tendency toward more redo-resections for recurrences after RLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologic outcomes of RLR were not inferior to those of LLR in selected HCC patients of stage BCLC 0-A with underlying cirrhosis. Both techniques guaranteed similar salvageability in case of HCC recurrence.

CT-based detection of clinically significant portal hypertension predicts post-hepatectomy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

While the CT-based method of detecting clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) emerged as a noninvasive alternative for evaluating CSPH, its predictive ability for post-hepatectomy outcomes is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of CT-based CSPH on outcomes following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who underwent hepatectomy for very early or early-stage HCC between January 2017 and December 2018. CSPH was assessed using CT-based criteria, which included splenomegaly determined by deep learning-based spleen volume measurements with personalized reference thresholds, and the presence of gastroesophageal varices (GEV), spontaneous portosystemic shunt or ascites. Logistic regression and competing risk analyses were used to identify factors associated with severe post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), hepatic decompensation, and liver-related death or transplantation. The predictive performance of existing models for PHLF was compared using both CT-based and conventional CSPH criteria (endoscopic GEV or splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia).

RESULTS

Among 593 patients (460 men; mean age 57.9 ± 9.3 years), 41 (6.9%) developed severe PHLF. The median follow-up period was 62 months. CT-based CSPH independently predicted severe PHLF (OR 7.672 [95% CI 3.209-18.346]), hepatic decompensation (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 4.518 [1.868-10.929]), and liver-related death or transplantation (sHR 2.756 [1.315-5.773]). When integrated into existing models, CT-based CSPH outperformed conventional CSPH in predicting severe PHLF (AUC 0.724 vs. 0.694 for EASL algorithm (p = 0.036) and 0.854 vs. 0.830 for Wang's model (p = 0.011)).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based CSPH is a strong predictor of poor post-hepatectomy outcomes in HCC patients with ACLD, offering a noninvasive surgical risk assessment tool.

KEY POINTS

Question Can CT-based detection of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) serve as a noninvasive predictor of post-hepatectomy outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients? Findings CT-based CSPH independently predicted severe post-hepatectomy liver failure, hepatic decompensation, and liver-related death or transplantation, outperforming conventional CSPH criteria in predictive performance. Clinical relevance CT-based CSPH offers a noninvasive and effective tool for surgical risk assessment in HCC patients, potentially improving the selection of candidates for hepatectomy and optimizing patient outcomes.

Overall survival is comparable between percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and liver resection as first-line therapies for solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Few studies have compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to clarify this issue.

METHODS

Patients with Child-Pugh class A liver disease and a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent LR or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study; 310 patients underwent LR and 114 patients underwent percutaneous RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables, including age, sex, alpha-fetoprotein level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the percutaneous RFA group than in the LR group (both p < 0.001). After PSM, 5-year OS was comparable between the two modalities (p = 0.367); however, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the LR group (p = 0.001). The two modalities did not differ in severe post-treatment complications (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year OS did not differ between treatment modalities for patients with a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm; however, the LR group's 5-year RFS was superior. LR should be recommended as the first-line treatment for these patients.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Impact of major hepatectomy on recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma at CNLC Ib stage: a propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo curative hepatectomy may experience varying remnant liver volumes. Our study aimed to evaluate whether the extent of liver resection has an effect on postoperative recurrence in HCC patients at China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) Ib stage.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 197 patients who underwent hepatectomy for a solitary HCC lesion measuring ≥5 cm (CNLC Ιb stage) between January 2019 and June 2022. Patients were divided into a major hepatectomy (MAH) group ( n =70) and a minor hepatectomy (MIH) group ( n =127) based on the extent of liver resection. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize bias in the retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent MAH had a greater total complication rate than those who underwent MIH (35.7 vs. 11.8%, P <0.001). The median RFS was 14.6 months (95% CI: 11.1-18.1) for the MAH group and 24.1 months (95% CI: 21.2-27.1) for the MIH group ( P <0.001). After PSM, patients who underwent MAH still had a greater total complication rate than those who underwent MIH (36.7 vs. 16.3%, P =0.037). The median RFS was 13.2 months (95% CI: 15.1-21.7) for the MAH group and 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.1-26.5) for the MIH group ( P =0.0013). The Cox regression model identified MAH as an independent poor predictor for HCC recurrence (hazard ratios of 1.826 and 2.062 before and after PSM, respectively; both P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

MIH can be performed with fewer postoperative complications and contributes to improved RFS in patients with HCC at CNLC Ιb stage compared to MAH. Parenchyma-sparing resection should be considered the first choice for these HCCs.

The assessment of impaired liver function and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The impairment of liver function strongly limits the therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the assessment of liver function is key to finding the appropriate therapy for patients suffering from this disease. Furthermore, preexisting liver dysfunction has a negative impact on the prognosis of patients in addition to the malignant potential of HCC. Hence, defining the optimal treatment of patients with HCC requires a comprehensive examination with liver function being a crucial part of it.

AREAS COVERED

This review will provide an overview of the currently existing methods for evaluating the liver function in patients with HCC. Assessment of liver function includes scoring systems but also functional and technical methods. In addition, the role of these tests in different treatment facilities such as liver resection, transplantation, interventional and systemic therapy is summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

A comprehensive pretherapeutic assessment of the liver function includes laboratory-based scoring systems, as well as imaging- and non-imaging-based functional tests. Combining diverse parameters can help to improve the safety and efficacy of HCC therapy particularly in patients with compromised liver function. Future research should focus on optimizing pretherapeutic assessment recommendations for each therapy.

SLC4A11 mediates ammonia import and promotes cancer stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma

End-stage liver disease is marked by portal hypertension, systemic elevations in ammonia, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While these clinical consequences of cirrhosis are well described, it remains poorly understood whether hepatic insufficiency and the accompanying elevations in ammonia contribute to HCC carcinogenesis. Using preclinical models, we discovered that ammonia entered the cell through the transporter SLC4A11 and served as a nitrogen source for amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis. Elevated ammonia promoted cancer stem cell properties in vitro and tumor initiation in vivo. Enhancing ammonia clearance reduced HCC stemness and tumor growth. In patients, elevations in serum ammonia were associated with an increased incidence of HCC. Taken together, this study forms the foundation for clinical investigations using ammonia-lowering agents as potential therapies to mitigate HCC incidence and aggressiveness.

Association of preoperative antiviral treatment with incidences of post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a common consequence of radical partial hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between preoperative antiviral therapy and PHLF, as well as assess the potential efficacy of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level in predicting PHLF.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed involving 1301 HCC patients with HBV who underwent radical hepatectomy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capacity of HBV DNA to predict PHLF and establish the optimal cutoff value for subsequent analyses. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the independent risk factors of PHLF. The increase in the area under the ROC curve, categorical net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to quantify the efficacy of HBV DNA level for predicting PHLF. The P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analyses showed that preoperative antiviral therapy was independently associated with a reduced risk of PHLF (P < 0.05). HBV DNA level with an optimal cutoff value of 269 IU/mL (P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor of PHLF. All the reference models by adding the variable of HBV DNA level had an improvement in area under the curve, categorical NRI, and IDI, particularly for the fibrosis-4 model, with values of 0.729 (95%CI: 0.705-0.754), 1.382 (95%CI: 1.341-1.423), and 0.112 (95%CI: 0.110-0.114), respectively. All the above findings were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In summary, preoperative antiviral treatment can reduce the incidence of PHLF, whereas an increased preoperative HBV DNA level has a correlative relationship with an increased susceptibility to PHLF.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults

Deaths from the majority of cancers are falling globally, but the incidence and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United Kingdom and in other Western countries. HCC is a highly fatal cancer, often diagnosed late, with an incidence to mortality ratio that approaches 1. Despite there being a number of treatment options, including those associated with good medium to long-term survival, 5-year survival from HCC in the UK remains below 20%. Sex, ethnicity and deprivation are important demographics for the incidence of, and/or survival from, HCC. These clinical practice guidelines will provide evidence-based advice for the assessment and management of patients with HCC. The clinical and scientific data underpinning the recommendations we make are summarised in detail. Much of the content will have broad relevance, but the treatment algorithms are based on therapies that are available in the UK and have regulatory approval for use in the National Health Service.

The Impact of Portal Hypertension Assessment Method on the Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection: A Meta-Analysis of Matched Cohort and Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVE

Examine portal hypertension (PHT) impact on postoperative and survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after liver resection (LR), specifically exploring distinctions between indirect signs and invasive measurements of PHT.

BACKGROUND

PHT has historically discouraged LR in individuals with HCC due to the elevated risk of morbidity, including liver decompensation (LD).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using 3 databases to identify prospective-controlled and matched cohort studies until December 28, 2022. Focus on comparing postoperative outcomes (mortality, morbidity, and liver-related complications) and overall survival in HCC patients with and without PHT undergoing LR. Three meta-analysis models were utilized: for aggregated data (fixed-effects inverse variance model), for patient-level survival data (one-stage frequentist meta-analysis with gamma-shared frailty Cox proportional hazards model), and for pooled data (Freeman-Tukey exact and double arcsine method).

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 1124 patients were analyzed. Indirect signs of PHT were not significantly associated with higher mortality, overall complications, PHLF or LD. However, LR in patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mm Hg significantly increased the risk of overall complications, PHLF, and LD. Despite elevated risks, the procedure resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 55.2%. Open LR significantly increased the risk of overall complications, PHLF, and LD. Conversely, PHT did not show a significant association with worse postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive LR.

CONCLUSIONS

LR in the presence of indirect signs of PHT poses no increased risk of complications. Yet, in HVPG ≥10 mm Hg patients, LR increases overall morbidity and liver-related complications risk. Transjugular HVPG assessment is crucial for LR decisions. Minimally invasive approach seems to be vital for favorable outcomes, especially in HVPG ≥10 mm Hg patients.

A novel surgical scheme for hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with clinically significant portal hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) seriously affects the feasibility and safety of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The aim of this study was to establish a new surgical scheme defining risk classification of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) to facilitate the surgical decision-making and identify suitable candidates for individual hepatectomy among HCC patients with CSPH.

BACKGROUNDS

Hepatectomy is the preferred treatment for HCC. Surgeons must maintain a balance between the expected oncological outcomes of HCC removal and short-term risks of severe PHLF and morbidity. CSPH aggravates liver decompensation and increases the risk of severe PHLF thus complicating hepatectomy for HCC.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression and stochastic forest algorithm were performed, then the independent risk factors of severe PHLF were included in a nomogram to determine the risk of severe PHLF. Further, a conditional inference tree (CTREE) through recursive partitioning analysis validated supplement the misdiagnostic threshold of the nomogram.

RESULTS

This study included 924 patients, of whom 137 patients (14.8%) suffered from mild-CSPH and 66 patients suffered from (7.1%) with severe-CSPH confirmed preoperatively. Our data showed that preoperative prolonged prothrombin time, total bilirubin, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min, CSPH grade, and standard future liver remnant volume were independent predictors of severe PHLF. By incorporating these factors, the nomogram achieved good prediction performance in assessing severe PHLF risk, and its concordance statistic was 0.891, 0.850 and 0.872 in the training cohort, internal validation cohort and external validation cohort, respectively, and good calibration curves were obtained. Moreover, the calculations of total points of diagnostic errors with 95% CI were concentrated in 110.5 (range 76.9-178.5). It showed a low risk of severe PHLF (2.3%), indicating hepatectomy is feasible when the points fall below 76.9, while the risk of severe PHLF is extremely high (93.8%) and hepatectomy should be rigorously restricted at scores over 178.5. Patients with points within the misdiagnosis threshold were further examined using CTREE according to a hierarchic order of factors represented by the presence of CSPH grade, ICG-R15, and sFLR.

CONCLUSION

This new surgical scheme established in our study is practical to stratify risk classification in assessing severe PHLF, thereby facilitating surgical decision-making and identifying suitable candidates for individual hepatectomy.

Microwave ablation versus laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension: a propensity score-matched study of postoperative liver decompensation

OBJECTIVES

The study of postoperative liver decompensation after microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is still lacking. The purpose of the present study was to compare the postoperative liver decompensation after MWA and laparoscopic resection (LR) for HCC in patients with CSPH.

METHODS

The present retrospective study enrolled 222 HCC patients with CSPH who underwent MWA (n = 67) or LR (n = 155). Postoperative liver decompensation, complications, postoperative hospital stays, and overall survival were analyzed. Factors associated with postoperative liver decompensation were identified.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the postoperative liver decompensation rate was significantly lower in the MWA group than that in the LR group (15.5% versus 32.8%, p = 0.030). The multivariable regression analysis identified that type of treatment (MWA vs. LR, odds ratio [OR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.91; p = 0.026) and Child-Pugh B (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.24-6.61; p = 0.014) were independent predictors for postoperative liver decompensation. The rate of complications for patients in the MWA group was significantly lower than that in the LR group (p < 0.001). And MWA showed shorter postoperative hospital stays than LR (3 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Overall survival rate between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.163).

CONCLUSION

Compared with laparoscopic resection, microwave ablation has a lower rate of postoperative liver decompensation and might be a better option for HCC patients with CSPH.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Microwave ablation exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative liver decompensation in comparison to laparoscopic resection, thereby conferring greater advantages to hepatocellular carcinoma patients with clinically significant portal hypertension.

KEY POINTS

•Postoperative liver decompensation rate after microwave ablation was lower than that of laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. •Microwave ablation showed shorter postoperative hospital stays than laparoscopic resection. •Microwave ablation had fewer complications than laparoscopic resection.

Giant hepatic hemangioma in a patient with cirrhosis: challenging to manage

Giant hepatic hemangiomas are occasional in patients with cirrhosis. It remains a challenge to decide on the need for treatment and choose the most appropriate intervention. A 62-year-old woman was recently diagnosed with cirrhosis and complained of upper abdominal fullness, reduction in oral food intake, and weight loss of 6 kg over the last three years. Upper digestive endoscopy evidenced thin-caliber esophageal varices and significant extrinsic compression of the lesser gastric curvature. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an exophytic tumor in the left hepatic lobe, measuring 11.5 cm, which had progressive centripetal contrast enhancement from the arterial phase, compatible with hepatic hemangioma. Serum tumor markers were negative, and her liver function was unimpaired. The patient underwent surgical resection (non-anatomical hepatectomy of segments II and III) which had no immediate complications, and the histopathological evaluation confirmed cavernous hepatic hemangioma. Two weeks later, she was admitted to the emergency room with jaundice, signs of hepatic encephalopathy, and moderate ascites, and was further diagnosed with secondary bacterial peritonitis. As no perforations, abscesses, or fistulas were observed on subsequent imaging tests, clinical management was successfully carried out. This case highlights that giant hepatic hemangiomas may be symptomatic and warrant treatment. In the setting of cirrhosis and portal hypertension, physicians should be aware of the risk of hepatic decompensation following surgical resection, even in patients with Child-Pugh class A.

Short-term postoperative outcomes of lymphadenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases in the modern era of liver surgery: Insights from the StuDoQ|Liver registry

INTRODUCTION

The clinical role of lymphadenectomy (LAD) as part of hepatic resection for malignancies of the liver remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to report on the use cases and postoperative outcomes of liver resection and simultaneous LAD for hepatic malignancies (HM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data from patients who underwent surgery at 13 German centers from 2017 to 2022 (n = 3456) was extracted from the StuDoQ|Liver registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to account for the extent of liver resection and patient demographics.

RESULTS

LAD was performed in 545 (16%) cases. The most common indication for LAD was cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), followed by colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). N+ status was found in 7 (8%), 59 (35%), and 56 cases (35%) for HCC, CCA, and CRLM, respectively (p < 0.001). The LAD rate was highest for robotic-assisted resections (28%) followed by open (26%) and laparoscopic resections (13%), whereas the number of resected lymph nodes was equivalent between the techniques (p = 0.303). LAD was associated with an increased risk of liver-specific postoperative complications, especially for patients with HCC.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter registry study, LAD was found to be associated with an increased risk of liver-specific complications. The highest rate of LAD was observed among robotic liver resections.

Protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites after liver resection: an open-label, single-arm phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis, massive ascites after hepatic resection is the cause of prolonged hospitalization and worsening prognosis. Recently, the efficacy of tolvaptan in refractory ascites has been reported; however, there are no reports on the efficacy or safety of tolvaptan for refractory ascites after hepatic resection. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early administration of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites after hepatic resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an open-label, single-arm phase I/II study. This study subject will comprise patients scheduled for hepatic resection of a liver tumor. Patients with refractory ascites after hepatic resection (drainage volume on postoperative day 1 ≥5 ml/body weight 1 kg/day) will be treated with tolvaptan. The primary endpoint will include the maximum change in body weight after hepatic resection relative to the preoperative baseline. The secondary endpoints will include drainage volume, abdominal circumference, urine output, postoperative complication rate (heart failure and respiratory failure), number of days required for postoperative weight gain because of ascites to decrease to preoperative weight, change in improvement of postoperative pleural effusion, total amount of albumin or fresh frozen plasma transfusion, type and amount of diuretics used, and postoperative hospitalization days.

CONCLUSION

This trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan prophylaxis for refractory ascites after hepatic resection. As there are no reports demonstrating the efficacy of tolvaptan prophylaxis for refractory ascites after hepatic resection, the authors expect that these findings will lead to future phase III trials and provide valuable indications for the selection of treatments for refractory postoperative ascites.

The complication-overall survival (CompOS) risk tool predicts risk of a severe postoperative complications relative to long-term survival among patients with primary liver cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop a tool based on preoperative factors to predict the risk of perioperative complications based on the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and long-term survival outcomes after liver resection for primary liver cancer.

METHODS

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy between 1990 and 2020 were identified using a multi-institutional international database.

RESULTS

Among 1411 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection (HCC: 997, 70.7%; ICC: 414, 29.3%), median patient age was 66.0 years (IQR, 57.0-73.0), and most patients were male (n = 1001, 70.9%). In the postoperative setting, 699 patients (49.5%) experienced a complication; moreover, 112 patients (7.9%) had major complications. Although most patients had a favorable risk complication-overall survival (CompOS) profile (CCI score > 40 risk of <30% and median survival of >5 years: n = 778, 55.1%), 553 patients (39.2%) had an intermediate-risk profile, and 80 patients (5.7%) had a very unfavorable risk profile (CCI score > 40 risk of ≥30% and/or median survival of ≤1.5 years). The areas under the curve of the test and validation cohorts were 0.73 and 0.76, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CompOS risk model accurately stratified patients relative to short- and long-term risks, identifying a subset of patients at a high risk of major complications and poor overall survival.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Hepatologist's Perspective

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer, represents a growing health challenge worldwide. The incidence of HCC is rising, which, in turn, has led to a corresponding increase in the associated number of deaths. HCC will become the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by 2030. HCC usually develops in the setting of chronic liver disease. Individuals at increased risk of HCC are recommended to undergo surveillance with ultrasound every 6 months along with serum α-fetoprotein testing. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered alternatives based on specific patient factors. Lesions suspicious for HCC are recommended to undergo a diagnostic testing, which includes contrast-enhanced multiphase CT or MRI and liver biopsy when findings are indeterminate. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy is the most used assessment for patients with HCC ( Fig. 2 ). Curative therapies include resection, liver transplantation, and ablation. Locoregional therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, can be used for patients with intermediate-stage HCC. For patients with advanced-stage HCC, systemic therapy is often used. This review aims to provide an overview of HCC from a hepatologist's perspective, including epidemiology, screening, surveillance, diagnosis, and management.

Predicting symptomatic post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: development and validation of a preoperative nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a nomogram based on liver stiffness (LS) for predicting symptomatic post-hepatectomy (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 266 patients with HCC were enrolled prospectively from three tertiary referral hospitals from August 2018 to April 2021. All patients underwent preoperative laboratory examination to obtain parameters of liver function. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) was performed to measure LS. Three-dimensional virtual resection obtained the different volumes including future liver remnant (FLR). A nomogram was developed by using logistic regression and determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration curve analysis, which was validated internally and externally.

RESULTS

A nomogram was constructed with the following variables: FLR ratio (FLR of total liver volume), LS greater than 9.5 kPa, Child-Pugh grade, and the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). This nomogram enabled differentiation of symptomatic PHLF in the derivation cohort (area under curve [AUC], 0.915), internal fivefold cross-validation (mean AUC, 0.918), internal validation cohort (AUC, 0.876) and external validation cohort (AUC, 0.845). The nomogram also showed good calibration in the derivation, internal validation, and external validation cohorts (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p = 0.641, p = 0.06, and p = 0.127, respectively). Accordingly, the safe limit of the FLR ratio was stratified using the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

An elevated level of LS was associated with the occurrence of symptomatic PHLF in HCC. A preoperative nomogram integrating LS, clinical and volumetric features was useful in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients with HCC, which might help surgeons in the management of HCC resection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A serial of the safe limit of the future liver remnant was proposed by a preoperative nomogram for hepatocellular carcinoma, which might help surgeons in 'how much remnant is enough in liver resection'.

KEY POINTS

• An elevated liver stiffness with the best cutoff value of 9.5 kPa was associated with the occurrence of symptomatic post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma. • A nomogram based on both quality (Child-Pugh grade, liver stiffness, and portal hypertension) and quantity of future liver remnant was developed to predict symptomatic post-hepatectomy liver failure for HCC, which enabled good discrimination and calibration in both derivation and validation cohorts. • The safe limit of future liver remnant volume was stratified using the proposed nomogram, which might help surgeons in the management of HCC resection.

CT Rule-in and Rule-out Criteria for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Chronic Liver Disease

Background The value of CT in assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) has not been well determined. Purpose To evaluate the performance of CT features that have been associated with portal hypertension for diagnosing CSPH in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with CLD who underwent contrast-enhanced CT and subsequent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement within 3 months at two tertiary institutions from January 2001 to December 2019. Two readers independently evaluated the presence of gastroesophageal varix, spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS), and ascites on CT images. Splenomegaly at CT was determined using three methods, as follows: personalized or fixed volume criteria, based on spleen volume as measured by a deep learning algorithm, or manually measured spleen diameter. The diagnostic performance of these findings alone or in combination for detecting CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mm Hg) was evaluated. Results A total of 235 patients (mean age, 53.2 years ± 13.0 [SD]; 155 male patients), including 110 (46.8%) with CSPH, were included. Detection of CSPH according to the presence of both splenomegaly and at least one other CT feature (ie, gastroesophageal varix, SPSS, and ascites) achieved specificities of 94.4%-97.6%, whereas detection of CSPH according to the presence of any feature (ie, splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varix, SPSS, or ascites) achieved sensitivities of 94.5%-98.2%. When employing the former as rule-in criteria with the absence of splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varix, SPSS, and ascites as rule-out criteria for CSPH, 171-185 (range, 72.8%-78.7%) of 235 patients were correctly classified as either having CSPH or not, seven to 13 (range, 3%-5.5%) of 235 patients were incorrectly classified, and 42-54 (range, 17.9%-23%) of 235 patients were unclassified. Conclusion The presence or absence of splenomegaly, gastroesophageal varix, SPSS, and/or ascites on CT images may be useful for ruling in and ruling out CSPH in patients with CLD. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fraum in this issue.

Management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and strategies for optimal outcomes

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis, management of early-stage HCC is often successful with highly efficacious treatment modalities such as liver transplantation, surgical resection, and radiofrequency ablation. However, unfavorable clinical outcomes have been observed under certain circumstances, even after efficient treatment. Factors that predict unsuitable results after treatment include tumor markers, inflammatory markers, imaging findings reflecting tumor biology, specific outcome indicators for each treatment modality, liver functional reserve, and the technical feasibility of the treatment modalities. Various strategies may overcome these challenges, including the application of reinforced treatment indication criteria with predictive markers reflecting tumor biology, compensation for technical issues with up-to-date technologies, modification of treatment modalities, downstaging with locoregional therapies (such as transarterial chemotherapy or radiotherapy), and recently introduced combination immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in the management of early-stage HCC and suggest strategies to overcome these obstacles.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma:Insights in epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging, prevention and therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is estimated to be the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and is characterized by low survival rates. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is emerging as a leading cause of HCC, whose rates are increasing, owing to the increasing prevalence of NAFLD. The pathogenesis of NAFLD-associated HCC is multifactorial: insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes and the low-grade hepatic inflammation, which characterizes NAFLD, seem to play key roles in the development and progression of HCC. The diagnosis of NAFLD-associated HCC is based on imaging in the presence of liver cirrhosis, preferably computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, but liver biopsy for histological confirmation is usually required in the absence of liver cirrhosis. Some preventive measures have been recommended for NAFLD-associated HCC, including weight loss, cessation of even moderate alcohol drinking and smoking, as well as the use of metformin, statins and aspirin. However, these preventive measures are mainly based on observational studies, thus they need validation in trials of different design before introducing in clinical practice. The treatment of NAFLD should be tailored on an individual basis and should be ideally determined by a multidisciplinary team. In the last two decades, new medications, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoints inhibitors, have improved the survival of patients with advanced HCC, but trials specifically designed for patients with NAFLD-associated HCC are scarce. The aim of this review was to overview evidence on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of NAFLD-associated HCC, then to comment on imaging tools for its appropriate screening and diagnosis, and finally to critically summarize the currently available options for its prevention and treatment.

Breakthroughs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapies

Several breakthroughs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy across tumor stages provide hope to improve its dismal prognosis. Although surgical and local ablative therapies have few significant changes in technique, an improved understanding of tumor biology has facilitated increase numbers of patients who are now eligible to undergo curative-intent procedures. Most notably, acceptable post-transplant outcomes can be achieved in well selected patients whose tumors are downstaged into Milan Criteria. Adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of recurrence also significantly improves recurrence-free survival after resection or ablation. For patients with liver-localized disease who are not eligible for curative-intent procedures, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was historically the treatment modality of choice, regardless of tumor burden; however, there is now increased recognition of patients who are "TACE unsuitable" and may be better treated with systemic therapy. The greatest evolution in HCC treatment options has occurred with systemic therapy, where several new agents are now available in the first- and second-line setting, including immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations. Objective responses are observed in approximately 30% of patients and median survival is approaching 2 years. The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors has renewed interest in combination therapies for earlier tumor stages, with several phase III trials ongoing. Considering increasing complexities of HCC care, requiring decisions between therapies delivered by different providers, multidisciplinary care is critical and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we detail major breakthroughs in HCC therapy, how these breakthroughs can be applied in clinical practice, and remaining areas in need of further research.

The Efficacy of Surgical Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study

Background

There is controversy regarding whether patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be offered radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a first-line treatment option. Thus, this study compared overall survival after surgical resection (SR) and RFA for single HCC.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used for this retrospective study. The study included 30- to 84-year-old patients diagnosed with HCC from 2000 to 2018. Selection bias was reduced via propensity score matching (PSM). The study compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with single HCC who were treated with SR and RFA.

Results

Before and after PSM, the median OS and median CSS were significantly longer in the SR group than in the RFA group (p < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the median OS and median CSS for male and female patients with male and female patients with tumor sizes <3, 3-5, and>5 cm, age at diagnosis between 60 and 84 years, and grades I-IV tumors were longer than in the SR group than in the RFA group (p < 0.05). Similar results were reported for patients who received chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that compared with RFA, SR was an independent favorable factor for OS and CSS (p < 0.05) before and after PSM.

Conclusion

Patients with SR who had a single HCC showed higher OS and CSS compared with patients who received RFA. Hence, SR should be used as a first-line treatment in cases of single HCC.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Decompensated Cirrhotic Patients: A Comprehensive Overview

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver cancer cases, mostly on the basis of cirrhosis. However, the data and therapeutic options for the treatment of HCC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are rather limited. This patient category is often considered to be in a terminal stage without the possibility of a specific treatment except liver transplantation, which is restricted by several criteria and liver donor shortages. Systemic treatments may provide a solution for patients with Child Pugh class B or C since they are less invasive. Although most of the existing trials have excluded patients with decompensated cirrhosis, there are increasing data from real-life settings that show acceptable tolerability and satisfying efficacy in terms of response. The data on the administration of locoregional treatments in such patients are also limited, but the overall survival seems to be potentially prolonged when patients are carefully selected, and close adverse event monitoring is applied. The aim of this review is to analyze the existing data regarding the administration of treatments in decompensated patients with HCC, evaluate the effect of therapy on overall survival and highlight the potential risks in terms of tolerability.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

Importance

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recent advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in many guidelines regarding systemic therapy, as well as the possibility to downstage patients to undergo resection. This review examines the advances in surgical and medical therapies relative to multidisciplinary treatment strategies for HCC.

Observations

HCC is a major health problem worldwide. The obesity epidemic has made nonalcoholic fatty liver disease a major risk factor for the development of HCC. Multiple societies, such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the European Association for the Study of the Liver, the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, provide guidelines for screening at-risk patients, as well as define staging systems to guide optimal treatment strategies. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system is widely accepted and has recently undergone updates with the introduction of new systemic therapies and stage migration.

Conclusions and Relevance

The treatment of patients with HCC should involve a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration among surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and interventional radiologists to provide optimal care. Treatment paradigms must consider both tumor and patient-related factors such as extent of liver disease, which is a main driver of morbidity and mortality. The advent of more effective systemic and locoregional therapies has prolonged survival among patients with advanced disease and allowed some patients to undergo surgical intervention who would otherwise have disease considered unresectable.

Future liver volume combined with platelet count predicts liver failure after major hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Major hepatectomy is associated with high incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of future remnant liver volume combined with liver function tests on predicting PHLF.

METHODS

Patients who underwent major hepatectomy from April 2009 to May 2017 were enrolled in the training cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of PHLF and generate a logistic regression model for the prediction of PHLF. A conditional inference tree was generated based on the optimal cutoff value of independent predictive factors of PHLF. The precedent results were validated in an independent cohort from June 2017 to March 2018.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen patients were included in the training cohort, while another 34 in the validation cohort. Future remnant liver volume/estimated standard total liver volume (FLV/eTV) and preoperative platelet count were independent predictive factors of PHLF (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.012, respectively). The conditional inference tree showed that patients with FLV/eTV ≤0.56 and PLT count ≤145 × 109/L were at high risk of developing PHLF.

CONCLUSION

FLV/eTV combined with preoperative PLT count is effective in predicting PHLF after major hepatectomy.

Post-hepatectomy liver failure prediction and prevention: Development of a nomogram containing postoperative anticoagulants as a risk factor

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication after hepatectomy, and its effective methods for preoperative prediction are lacking. Here, we aim to identify predictive factors and build a nomogram to evaluate patients' risk of developing PHLF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a training cohort, including 199 patients who underwent hepatectomy at the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, was conducted. Independent risk variables for PHLF were identified using multivariate analysis of perioperative variables, and a nomogram was used to build a predictive model. To test the predictive power, a prospective study in which a validation cohort of 71 patients was evaluated using the nomogram. The prognostic value of this nomogram was evaluated by the C-index.

RESULTS

Independent risk variables for PHLF were identified from perioperative variables. In multivariate analysis of the training cohort, tumor number, Pringle maneuver, blood loss, preoperative platelet count, postoperative ascites and use of anticoagulant medications were determined to be key risk factors for the development of PHLF, and they were selected for inclusion in our nomogram. The nomogram showed a 0.911 C-index for the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the nomogram also showed good prognostic value for predicting PHLF. The validation cohort was used with similarly successful results to evaluate risk in two previously published study models with calculated C-indexes of 0.718 and 0.711.

CONCLUSION

Our study establishes for the first time a novel nomogram that can be used to identify patients at risk of developing PHLF.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common cancers worldwide and represents a major global health-care challenge. Although viral hepatitis and alcohol remain important risk factors, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is rapidly becoming a dominant cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. A broad range of treatment options are available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplantation, surgical resection, percutaneous ablation, and radiation, as well as transarterial and systemic therapies. As such, clinical decision making requires a multidisciplinary team that longitudinally adapts the individual treatment strategy according to the patient's tumour stage, liver function, and performance status. With the approval of new first-line agents and second-line agents, as well as the establishment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies as standard of care, the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is more diversified than ever. Consequently, the outlook for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has improved. However, the optimal sequencing of drugs remains to be defined, and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to inform treatment selection. In this Seminar, we present an update on the causes, diagnosis, molecular classification, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Paradigm shift in the treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent worldwide with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. The advancement of therapeutic options and the development of new systemic therapies expand the armamentarium to tackle HCC. Treatment options should be provided based on the hierarchy of efficacy in a multidisciplinary perspective, instead of the traditional stage-guided scheme. In advanced HCC, lenvatinib has a comparable efficacy as sorafenib for the first-line therapy of HCC; while regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab have been approved as second-line therapy after the failure of sorafenib. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy prolongs response rate and survival and enables long-term cure. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is superior to sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Several emerging regimens by the combination of various systemic therapies are currently under clinical trials. Systemic therapy may be used in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or even as initial therapy for intermediate-stage HCC. The paradigm shift of HCC treatment will improve patient outcomes.

How important is the role of iterative liver direct surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for a transplant center located in an area with a low rate of deceased donation?

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for nearly 90% of primary liver cancers, with estimates of over 1 million people affected by 2025. We aimed to explore the impacting role of an iterative surgical treatment approach in a cohort of HCC patients within the Milan criteria, associated with clinical risk factors for tumor recurrence (RHCC) after liver transplant (LT) and loco-regional therapies (LRT), as well as liver resection (LR) and/or microwave thermal ablation (MWTA).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed our experience performed during an 8-year period between January 2013 and December 2021 in patients treated for HCC, focusing on describing the impact on preoperative end-stage liver disease severity, oncologic staging, tumor characteristics, and surgical treatments. The Cox model was used to evaluate variables that could predict relapse risks. Relapse risk curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare them.

Results

There were 557 HCC patients treated with a first-line approach of LR and/or LRTs (n = 335) or LT (n = 222). The median age at initial transplantation was 59 versus 68 for those whose first surgical approach was LR and/or LRT. In univariate analysis with the Cox model, nodule size was the single predictor of recurrence of HCC in the posttreatment setting (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.05–2.47, p = 0.030). For the LRT group, we have enlightened the following clinical characteristics as significantly associated with RHCC: hepatitis B virus infection (which has a protective role with HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.94, p = 0.038), number of HCC nodules (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.22–1.94, p &lt; 0.001), size of the largest nodule (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.12, p = 0.023), serum bilirubin (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.03–2.40, p = 0.038), and international normalized ratio (HR: 16.40, 95% CI: 2.30–118.0, p = 0.006). Among the overall 111 patients with RHCC in the LRT group, 33 were iteratively treated with further curative treatment (12 were treated with LR, two with MWTA, three with a combined LR-MWTA treatment, and 16 underwent LT). Only one of 18 recurrent patients previously treated with LT underwent LR. For these RHCC patients, multivariable analysis showed the protective roles of LT for primary RHCC after IDLS (HR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.36, p = 0.002), of the time relapsed between the first and second IDLS treatments (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94–0.99, p = 0.044), and the impact of previous minimally invasive treatment (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08–1.00, p = 0.051).

Conclusion

The coexistence of RHCC with underlying cirrhosis increases the complexity of assessing the net health benefit of ILDS before LT. Minimally invasive surgical therapies and time to HCC relapse should be considered an outcome in randomized clinical trials because they have a relevant impact on tumor-free survival.

Comparison of prognoses between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal varices undergoing surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Esophageal varices (EV) is common and is a poor prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the outcomes between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic HCC patients with EV is not well studied. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and prognoses of HCC patients after surgical resection stratified by the cirrhosis status.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients with HCC and EV, who underwent surgical resection, were retrospectively enrolled between July 2003 and July 2019. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was established using the Ishak fibrosis score F5 or F6 in the nontumor part of liver specimens. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 85 (76.6%) and 26 (23.4%) patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. Compared with those without cirrhosis, there were more females, less seropositive rate of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), more seropositive rate of antibody against to hepatitis C virus (HCV), less albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1, lower platelet count, and more had tumor burden within the Milan criteria in cirrhotic patients. Cirrhotic patients had a higher risk of posthepatectomy decompensation compared to noncirrhotic patients (hazard ratio 9.577, p = 0.017). No difference was observed in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between patients with or without cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Compared with patients without cirrhosis, cirrhotic patients with HCC and EV are vulnerable to posthepatectomy decompensation. However, cirrhosis is not a poor prognostic factor of overall survival and recurrence for HCC patients after surgical resection.

Optimizing systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: the key role of liver function

The number of effective systemic therapies for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rapidly increasing, and the advent of immunotherapy has changed the treatment paradigm for these patients, leading to significantly improved survival outcomes. However, many patients with HCC will continue to receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors, partly because of contraindications to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Currently, the best sequential first- and second-line systemic treatment remains elusive. Maintenance of optimal liver function is crucial, it is likely to impinge on temporary or permanent treatment discontinuation, and should also be considered when defining the treatment sequence. Hepatic decompensation, which does not always coincide with disease progression, is part of this complex dynamically evolving system, and must be promptly recognized and adequately managed to allow the patient to continue in the therapeutic course. The purpose of this review is to highlight and summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic agents, with a focus on the impact of underlying cirrhosis, and to suggest new clinical outcomes for randomized controlled trials for advanced HCC to better assess the net health benefit in this specific setting.

A functional liver imaging score for preoperative prediction of liver failure after hepatocellular carcinoma resection

OBJECTIVES

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a challenging complication after resection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is associated with high mortality. Preoperative prediction of PHLF may improve patient subsequent and reduce such mortality. This study examined whether a functional liver imaging score (FLIS) based on preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict PHLF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 502 patients who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, followed by HCC resection. Significant preoperative predictors of PHLF were identified using logistic regression analysis. The ability of FLIS to predict PHLF was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and its predictive power was compared to that of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and indocyanine green 15-min retention rate (ICG-R15).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, PHLF was independently associated with FLIS (OR 0.452, 95% CI 0.361 to 0.568, p < 0.001) and major resection (OR 1.898, 95% CI 1.057 to 3.408, p = 0.032). FLIS was associated with a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.752) than the MELD score (0.557), ALBI score (0.609), or ICG-R15 (0.605) (all p < 0.05). Patients with FLIS ≤ 4 who underwent major resection were at 9.4-fold higher risk of PHLF than patients with lower FLIS who underwent minor resection.

CONCLUSION

FLIS is an independent predictor of PHLF, and it may perform better than the MELD score, ALBI score, and ICG-R15 clearance. We propose treating elevated FLIS and major resection as risk factors for PHLF.

KEY POINTS

• A functional liver imaging score can independently predict posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with HCC. • The score may predict such failure better than MELD and ALBI scores and ICG-R15. • Patients with scores ≤ 4 who undergo major hepatic resection may be at nearly tenfold higher risk of posthepatectomy liver failure.

BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update

There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.

BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update

There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.

BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update

There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.

BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update

There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.