1
|
Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, Choudhury A, Daneshmand S, Faltas BM, Flaig TW, Grass GD, Grivas P, Hansel DE, Hassanzadeh C, Kassouf W, Kukreja J, Mendoza-Valdés A, Moschini M, Mouw KW, Navai N, Necchi A, Rosenberg JE, Ross JS, Siefker-Radtke AO, Taylor J, Willliams SB, Zlotta AR, Buckley R, Kamat AM. Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00189-7. [PMID: 40268594 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patient-centric management necessitates providing care aligned with patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs. Therefore, critical assessment of bladder preservation therapies (BPTs) as alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and practical recommendations on the optimal selection of patients for BPTs are needed urgently. METHODS A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop BPT recommendations for MIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined based on discussions. Final recommendations achieved ≥75% agreement during the meeting, with further refinements through web conferences and e-mail discussions. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Patients with newly diagnosed MIBC should be offered evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting for consideration of BPTs. The main alternative to RC is trimodal therapy (TMT), and favorable prognostic factors for TMT include unifocal cT2 stage, lack of hydronephrosis, and no multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS). Other options should be reserved for very select patients who are ineligible for or who decline TMT or RC after thorough consideration of benefits versus risks. These include partial cystectomy (PC) for urachal adenocarcinoma and PC or radical transurethral resection alone for solitary tumors amenable to resection with adequate margins and without concomitant CIS or histologic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BPTs for MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bishoy M Faltas
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas W Flaig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - G Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Comron Hassanzadeh
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janet Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCC San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Urology and Medicine (Oncology), Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Taylor
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stephen B Willliams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Heath Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roger Buckley
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu TC, He ZP, Li ST, Zheng L, Zheng XY, Lan XL, Qu CH, Nie RC, Gu C, Huang LN, Cai XX, Xiang ZC, Xie D, Cai MY. TAOK1 promotes filament formation in HR repair through phosphorylating USP7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2025; 122:e2422262122. [PMID: 40106350 PMCID: PMC11962436 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2422262122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are vital therapeutic agents that exploit synthetic lethality, particularly effective in tumors with homologous recombination (HR) defects. However, broadening their clinical utility remains a significant challenge. In this study, we conducted a high-throughput kinase inhibitor screen to identify potential targets exhibiting synthetical lethality with PARP inhibitors. Our results show that thousand and one amino acid protein kinase 1 (TAOK1) plays a pivotal role in the DNA damage response by phosphorylating ubiquitin specific peptidase 7 (USP7), thereby promoting its enzymatic activity and preventing the ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation of RAD51, a crucial protein in the filament formation of HR repair. Notably, genetic depletion or pharmacological inhibition of TAOK1, as well as blocking peptide targeting the USP7 phosphorylation site, impaired USP7 function, leading to RAD51 degradation, disruption of HR repair, and increased tumor cell and sensitivity to PARP inhibition. This study highlights TAOK1 as a critical regulator of HR repair pathway in human cancer cells and presents a therapeutic strategy overcoming resistance to PARPi inhibitors. These findings support the potential clinical application of combining PARP inhibitors with TAOK1 inhibition or peptide treatment to improve therapeutic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian-Chen Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou510000, China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Zhang-Ping He
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Shu-Ting Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou510000, China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Lin Zheng
- Department of Pathology and Institute of Oncology, The School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian350000, China
| | - Xue-Yi Zheng
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Xia-Lu Lan
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Chun-Hua Qu
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Run-Cong Nie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Chao Gu
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou215000, China
| | - Li-Ning Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou215000, China
| | - Xiao-Xia Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Zhi-Cheng Xiang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Dan Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou510000, China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| | - Mu-Yan Cai
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou510000, China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou510000, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roumiguié M, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Bajeot AS, Allory Y, Sargos P, Leon P, Audenet F, Xylinas E, Pradère B, Prost D, Seisen T, Thibault C, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102741. [PMID: 39581664 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was carried out, taking into account the elements of the diagnosis, the treatment options and the monitoring of NMIBC and MIBC, evaluating the references with their level of evidence. RESULTS MIBC is diagosed after the must complete tumor resection possible . CT-Urography coupled with chest CT scans are used to assess the extent of MIBC. Multiparametric pelvic MRI may be an alternative imaging approach. Cystectomy combined with standard lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for nonmetastatic MIBC. Neoadjuvant cispaltine-based chemotherapy should be used in patients in good general health with satisfactory renal function. Enterocystoplasty is proposed for men and women in the absence of contraindications and when urethral recutting is negative on extemporaneous examination; otherwise, transileal cutaneous ureterostomy is the recommended method of urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an improved recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab is recommended. Second-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended. CONCLUSION Updating the ccAFU recommendations should improve patient management and enhance the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude-Huriez Hospital, CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277, Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER), 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li DX, Yu QX, Wu RC, Wang J, Feng DC, Deng S. Efficiency of bladder-sparing strategies for bladder cancer: an umbrella review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241249068. [PMID: 38736553 PMCID: PMC11088297 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241249068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder preservation (BP) has emerged as a clinical alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for alleviating the substantial physical and psychological burden imposed on localized bladder cancer patients. Nevertheless, disparities persist in the comparative evaluations of BP and RC. We aimed to address the disparities between BP and RC. An umbrella review and meta-analysis were conducted to explore these disparities. We extracted data from meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected after searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Review Manager 5.4.0 and R x64 4.1.3 were used to evaluate the collected data. Our study included 11 meta-analyses and 3 RCTs. In terms of progression-free survival, all the meta-analyses reported that patients with localized bladder cancer who underwent BP exhibited outcomes comparable to those who underwent RC. Meta-analyses regarding the outcomes of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) are controversial. To solve these issues, we conducted a pooled analysis of CSS data, which supported the similarity of CSS between BP and RC with no significant heterogeneity [odds ratio (OR): 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-2.02; I2 = 26%]. Similarly, the pooled OS results extracted from three RCTs indicated the comparability of OS between BP and RC with no significant heterogeneity (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.41-3.07; I2 = 33%). A combination of umbrella review and meta-analysis results suggested that BP had survival rates comparable to those of RC. We suggest that BP may be a more eligible therapy than RC for patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This conclusion warrants further validation through randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deng-xiong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing-xin Yu
- Ningbo Diagnostic Pathology Center, Ningbo City, Zhejiang, China
| | - Rui-cheng Wu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - De-chao Feng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Shi Deng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang L, Wang S, Shou J, Chen Y, Zhao X. MRI evaluation of vesical imaging reporting and data system for bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:49. [PMID: 38584289 PMCID: PMC11000365 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00696-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has demonstrated effectiveness in predicting muscle invasion in bladder cancer before treatment. The urgent need currently is to evaluate the muscle invasion status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for bladder cancer. This study aims to ascertain the accuracy of VI-RADS in detecting muscle invasion post-NAC treatment and assess its diagnostic performance across readers with varying experience levels. METHODS In this retrospective study, patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after NAC from September 2015 to September 2018 were included. VI-RADS scores were independently assessed by five radiologists, consisting of three experienced in bladder MRI and two inexperienced radiologists. Comparison of VI-RADS scores was made with postoperative histopathological diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) was used for evaluating diagnostic performance, calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC (AUC)). Interobserver agreement was assessed using the weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS The final analysis included 46 patients (mean age: 61 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; age range: 39-70 years; 42 men). The pooled AUC for predicting muscle invasion was 0.945 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.893-0.977) for experienced readers, and 0.910 (95% CI: 0.831-0.959) for inexperienced readers, and 0.932 (95% CI: 0.892-0.961) for all readers. At an optimal cut-off value ≥ 4, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 74.1% (range: 66.0-80.9%) and 94.1% (range: 88.6-97.7%) for experienced readers, and 63.9% (range: 59.6-68.1%) and 86.4% (range: 84.1-88.6%) for inexperienced readers. Interobserver agreement ranged from substantial to excellent between all readers (k = 0.79-0.92). CONCLUSIONS VI-RADS accurately assesses muscle invasion in bladder cancer patients after NAC and exhibits good diagnostic performance across readers with different experience levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinxin Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yichen Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yilin Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jin Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lianyu Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Sicong Wang
- GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Jianzhong Shou
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim JM, Choi E, Sung SH, Jo J, Lee DH, Park S. Does Bladder Cancer Subtype Influence Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) and Pelvic Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) Response Evaluation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Pathological Perspective. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:224-236. [PMID: 38042728 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to provide a pathological perspective on the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) by correlating the prechemotherapy transurethral resection of bladder tumor findings and postchemotherapy radiologic evaluation with final radical cystectomy (RC) findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 79 MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RC. Pelvic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and pathologic reports were retrieved from our institutional database. All pathology slides were reviewed based on diagnostic criteria with high interobserver reproducibility. RESULTS Pathologic complete response (pCR) was confirmed in 32 patients (40.5%). The concordance and discordance between MRI and RC findings occurred in 68.3% and 31.7% of cases, respectively. The 21.5% of cases that were clinical CR (cCR) on MRI actually achieved pCR on RC specimens and 46.8% of cases that were non-cCR on MRI were actually non-pCR on RC specimens. In 19.0% of cases, RC findings were pCR, but MRI demonstrated residual tumor and the opposite was 12.7%. The greatest discrepancy between the 2 methods (75%, 3/4) was for the plasmacytoid subtype. Plasmacytoid histology was the most common histological subtype identified in RC specimens after NAC, followed by micropapillary and squamous histologies. CONCLUSIONS We found that all cases with plasmacytoid and micropapillary subtypes, and squamous differentiation did not show pCR. In particular, the largest discrepancy between MRI findings and RC pathology after NAC was seen in the plasmacytoid subtype. An accurate pathologic diagnosis based on strict criteria to identify histological subtypes of MIBC is necessary for proper treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Min Kim
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Yangcheon-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Euno Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Yangcheon-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Hee Sung
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Yangcheon-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungmin Jo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Hyeon Lee
- Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sanghui Park
- Department of Pathology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Yangcheon-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Non-Surgical Bladder-Sparing Multimodal Management in Organ-Confined Urothelial Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder: A Population-Based Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1292. [PMID: 38610970 PMCID: PMC11010909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trimodal therapy is considered the most validated bladder-sparing treatment in patients with organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (T2N0M0). However, scarce evidence exists regarding cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences between trimodal therapy and other non-extirpative multimodal treatment options such as radiotherapy alone after transurethral resection (TURBT + RT) or chemotherapy alone after transurethral resection (TURBT + CT). METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T2N0M0 patients treated with either trimodal therapy, TURBT + CT, or TURBT + RT. Temporal trends described trimodal therapy vs. TUBRT + CT vs. TURBT + RT use over time. Survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM according to each treatment modality. RESULTS 3729 (40%) patients underwent TMT vs. 4030 (43%) TURBT + CT vs. 1599 (17%) TURBT + RT. Over time, trimodal therapy use (Estimating annual percent change, EAPC: +1.2%, p = 0.01) and TURBT + CT use increased (EAPC: +1.5%, p = 0.01). In MCR models, relative to trimodal therapy, TURBT + CT exhibited 1-14-fold higher CSM and TURBT + RT 1.68-fold higher CSM. In a subgroup analysis, TURBT + RT was associated with 1.42-fold higher CSM than TURBT + CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Strict trimodal therapy that includes both CT and RT after TURBT offers the best cancer control. When strict trimodal therapy cannot be delivered, cancer-specific survival outcomes appear to be superior with TURBT + chemotherapy compared to TURBT + RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy;
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Jordan A. Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang PH, Chen HY, Chang YS, Su PJ, Huang WK, Lin CF, Hsieh JCH, Wu CT. Effect of Clinical Complete Remission Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Chemotherapy in Bladder-Preservation Strategy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Declining Definitive Local Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:894. [PMID: 38473256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and identify the predictive factors of a bladder-preservation approach incorporating maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) coupled with either pembrolizumab or chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who opted against definitive local therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 53 MIBC (cT2-T3N0M0) patients who initially planned for neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or chemotherapy after maximal TURBT but later declined radical cystectomy and radiotherapy. Post-therapy clinical restaging and conservative bladder-preservation measures were employed. Clinical complete remission was defined as negative findings on cystoscopy with biopsy confirming the absence of malignancy if performed, negative urine cytology, and unremarkable cross-sectional imaging (either CT scan or MRI) following neoadjuvant therapy. Twenty-three patients received pembrolizumab, while thirty received chemotherapy. Our findings revealed that twenty-three (43.4%) patients achieved clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The complete remission rate was marginally higher in pembrolizumab group in comparison to chemotherapy group (52.1% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.26). After a median follow-up of 37.6 months, patients in the pembrolizumab group demonstrated a longer PFS (median, not reached vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.078) and OS (median, not reached vs. 26.8 months, p = 0.027) relative to those in chemotherapy group. Those achieving clinical complete remission post-neoadjuvant therapy also exhibited prolonged PFS (median, not reached vs. 10.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (median, not reached vs. 24.4 months, p = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, clinical complete remission subsequent to neoadjuvant therapy was independently associated with superior PFS and OS. In conclusion, bladder preservation emerges as a viable therapeutic strategy for a carefully selected cohort of MIBC patients without definitive local therapy, especially those achieving clinical complete remission following neoadjuvant treatment. For patients unfit for chemotherapy, pembrolizumab offers a promising alternative treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Hung Chang
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Yi Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
| | - Yueh-Shih Chang
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
| | - Po-Jung Su
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Kuan Huang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Feng Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
| | - Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei 236017, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Te Wu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Öztürk H, Karapolat İ. Evaluation of response to gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy using positron emission computed tomography for metastatic bladder cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:8447-8457. [PMID: 38188218 PMCID: PMC10768499 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i36.8447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study was to examine retrospectively the contribution of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) to the evaluation of response to first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. AIM To evaluate the response to Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin -based chemotherapy using 18FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS Between July 2007 and April 2019, 79 patients underwent 18FDG-PET/CT imaging with the diagnosis of Metastatic Bladder Carcinoma (M-BCa). A total of 42 patients (38 male, 4 female) were included in the study, and all had been administered Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After completion of the therapy, the patients underwent a repeat 18FDG-PET/CT scan and the results were compared with the PET/CT findings before chemotherapy according to European Organisation for the Research and treatment of cancer criteria. Mean age was 66.1 years and standard deviation was 10.7 years (range: 41-84 years). RESULTS Of the patients, seven (16.6%) were in complete remission, 17 (40.5%) were in partial remission, six (14.3%) had a stable disease, and 12 (28.6%) had a progressive disease. The overall response rate was 57.1 percent. CONCLUSION 18FDG-PET/CT can be considered as a successful imaging tool in evaluating response to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer. Anatomical and functional data obtained from PET/CT scans may be useful in the planning of secondline and thirdline chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Öztürk
- Department of Urology, Izmir University of Economics, Karsiyaka Izmir 35330, Turkey
| | - İnanç Karapolat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, İzmir Tınaztepe University, Izmir 35000, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ran S, Yang J, Hu J, Fang L, He W. Identifying Optimal Candidates for Trimodality Therapy among Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10166-10178. [PMID: 38132374 PMCID: PMC10742539 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This research aims to identify candidates for trimodality therapy (TMT) or radical cystectomy (RC) by using a predictive model. (2) Methods: Patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled. The clinical data of 2174 eligible patients were extracted and separated into RC and TMT groups. To control for confounding bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out. A nomogram was established via multivariable logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to assess the nomogram's prediction capacity. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was carried out to determine the nomogram's clinical applicability. (3) Results: After being processed with PSM, the OS of the RC group was significantly longer compared with the TMT group (p < 0.001). This remarkable capacity for discrimination was exhibited in the training (AUC: 0.717) and validation (AUC: 0.774) sets. The calibration curves suggested acceptable uniformity. Excellent clinical utility was shown in the DCA curve. The RC and RC-Beneficial group survived significantly longer than the RC and TMT-Beneficial group (p < 0.001) or the TMT group (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the RC and TMT-Beneficial group and the TMT group (p = 0.321). (4) Conclusions: A predictive model with excellent discrimination and clinical application value was established to identify the optimal patients for TMT among nonmetastatic MIBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengming Ran
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| | - Jingtian Yang
- Department of Urology, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518116, China;
| | - Jintao Hu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| | - Liekui Fang
- Department of Urology, The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518116, China;
| | - Wang He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China; (S.R.); (J.H.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510289, China
- Guangdong Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases, Guangzhou 510289, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu C, Zou W, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang J. Bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma using immune checkpoint inhibitors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 191:104137. [PMID: 37717879 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Multimodal bladder preservation therapy is already an alternative for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who are unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy. Various bladder-preserving strategies that employ immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for MIBC have been investigated. There are three common modes of ICI-based bladder preservation therapy, of which the most studied is ICIs combined with chemoradiotherapy. The bladder-preserving strategy of ICIs combined with radiation has been investigated in patients who poorly tolerate chemotherapy. ICIs combined with chemotherapy have also been explored in patients who responded to neoadjuvant therapy with a clinical complete response. All the above-described strategies have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles. However, the value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden and gene alterations for predicting the efficacy of immune-based bladder preservation therapy is still controversial. There remain some challenges for immune-based bladder preservation therapy, and large-sample randomized trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Xu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wen Zou
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yinhuai Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xianling Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laukhtina E, Quhal F, von Deimling M, Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Majdoub M, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. For Which Patients Should Bladder Preservation Be Considered After a Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:900-902. [PMID: 37150628 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Given the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy (RC) and the significant survival benefit for patients who experience tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is growing interest in bladder preservation strategies for select patients who have a complete response (CR) to NAC. In this mini-review we discuss the concept of avoiding RC as an alternative option for patients who experience a clinical CR following NAC. Several studies support this concept, with comparable long-term survival outcomes observed for patients with cT0 disease after NAC and patients undergoing RC. However, the definitive approach and the optimal surveillance strategy for patients with a clinical CR who choose bladder preservation are lacking. A dynamic response-driven bladder preservation strategy is a highly anticipated option for patients and is needed to avoid debilitating overtreatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected patients with bladder cancer who experience a complete response to chemotherapy before any surgery, close follow-up might be an alternative option to surgical removal of the bladder without compromising cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Long G, Hu Z, Liu Z, Ye Z, Wang S, Wang D, Yang C. Partial and radical cystectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes in bladder cancer when combined with adequate lymph node dissection: A population-based study. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:327.e1-327.e8. [PMID: 36966065 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the oncologic outcomes of bladder cancer (BCa) patients after partial cystectomy (PC) or radical cystectomy (RC) combined with lymph node dissection (LND). METHODS Relevant data from BCa patients who had >3 lymph nodes (LNs) removed were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Different thresholds of LN count in LND were tested to eliminate potential selection bias, and the optimal threshold was applied to screen patients who underwent adequate LND. After propensity score matching, the oncologic outcomes after PC or RC were compared in patients who underwent adequate LND. RESULTS After preliminary screening, 6,785 BCa cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with removal of > 3 LNs were enrolled in the analysis, including 633 (9.3%) PC cases and 6,152 (90.7%) RC cases. The PC and RC groups presented entirely different profiles in clinical parameters such as sex, T stage, number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, and adjuvant therapy. In particular, the LN-positive rate and count were higher in the RC group, even after adjusting for other confounding factors. After comparison using different thresholds, the LN positive rate and count were similar when the LN count in LND was restricted to > 12. In patients who had > 12 LNs removed, after propensity score matching, PC and RC presented similar oncologic outcomes. Further exploration found that the prognosis of patients was associated with age, T stage, and the number of positive LNs. CONCLUSION PC and RC could provide equivalent oncologic outcomes in BCa when combined with adequate LND. The conclusion needs further validation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gongwei Long
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China
| | - Zhiquan Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Dongwen Wang
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
| | - Chunguang Yang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grobet-Jeandin E, Lenfant L, Mir C, Giannarini G, Alcaraz A, Albersen M, Breda A, Briganti A, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes Associated with Bladder-sparing Strategies in Patients Achieving Complete Clinical Response to Initial Systemic Treatment for Localized Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:251-262. [PMID: 36906510 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Bladder-sparing strategies (BSSs) have been proposed for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) to initial systemic treatment to avoid toxicity related to radical cystectomy. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the current literature evaluating oncological outcomes of BSSs in patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting oncological outcomes of MIBC patients undergoing either surveillance or radiation therapy after achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we identified 23 noncomparative prospective or retrospective studies published between 1990 and 2021. The mean bladder and metastatic recurrence rates (range) as well as the mean bladder preservation rate (BPR; range) were calculated, and overall survival (OS) was extracted from included reports. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 16 and seven studies evaluated surveillance (n = 610) and radiation therapy (n = 175) in MIBC patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment, respectively. With regard to surveillance, the median follow-up ranged from 10 to 120 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 43% (0-71%), including 65% of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 35% of MIBC recurrences. The mean BPR was 73% (49-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 9% (0-27%), while 5-yr OS rates ranged from 64% to 89%. With regard to radiation therapy, the median follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 15% (0-29%), including 24% of NMIBC, 43% of MIBC, and 33% of unspecified recurrences. The mean BPR was 74% (71-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 17% (0-22%), while the 4-yr OS rate was 79%. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review showed that only low-level evidence supports the effectiveness of BSSs in selected patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC. These preliminary findings highlight the need for further prospective comparative research to demonstrate its efficacy. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed studies evaluating bladder-sparing strategies in patients achieving complete clinical response to initial systemic treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Based on low-level evidence, we observed that selected patients could benefit from surveillance or radiation therapy in this setting, but prospective comparative research is requested to confirm their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, F-75013, Paris, France; Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, F-75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mehr JP, Bates JN, Lerner SP. Is There A Benefit of Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Prior to Radical Cystectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:41-48. [PMID: 38994480 PMCID: PMC11181791 DOI: 10.3233/blc-220066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the best predictors of positive outcomes in bladder cancer (BC) is pT0 following radical cystectomy (RC). Discordance between clinical and pathologic staging affects decision-making in patients with clinical absence of disease (cT0). OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether a restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) improves clinical staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage RC in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) versus those who did not receive NAC. METHODS We queried our prospectively maintained IRB approved institutional database to identify 129 patients who underwent RC from 2013 to 2019 with a re-TURBT prior to RC. 53 patients were treated with NAC between their initial and re-TURBT and 76 patients were not treated with NAC. RESULTS The overall upstaging rate from re-TURBT to RC was 34.9%. There was no significant difference in the upstaging rate between the NAC and no-NAC groups - 31.0% vs. 37.0%, respectively. In patients who were cT0 on re-TURBT, the NAC group did not show a significantly greater rate of pathologic clinical CR (pT0) than the no NAC group - 38.5% vs. 37.5%, respectively. Re-TURBT with staging < rT2 as a predictor for absence of MIBC on pathologic staging ( CONCLUSIONS Re-TURBT after NAC does not show statistically significant improvement in staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage at RC compared to re-TURBT in patients not treated with NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin P Mehr
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jenna N Bates
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Esteban-Villarrubia J, Torres-Jiménez J, Bueno-Bravo C, García-Mondaray R, Subiela JD, Gajate P. Current and Future Landscape of Perioperative Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:566. [PMID: 36765525 PMCID: PMC9913718 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, less than half of patients are candidates for this treatment, and 50% will develop metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered if neoadjuvant treatment has not been administered for suitable patients. It is important to reduce the risk of systemic recurrence and improve the prognosis of localized MIBC. Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates or FGFR inhibitors, are new therapeutic alternatives and have shown their benefit in advanced disease. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of these drugs, as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with promising outcomes. In addition, the development of predictive biomarkers could predict responses to neoadjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Pablo Gajate
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Girardi DM, Ghatalia P, Singh P, Iyer G, Sridhar SS, Apolo AB. Systemic therapy in bladder preservation. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:39-47. [PMID: 33223367 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease. Even when presenting as localized muscle-invasive disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 70%, and the recurrence rate after radical cystectomy is approximately 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has the potential to downstage the primary tumor and treat micrometastases, leading to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in cure rates. There is level 1 evidence in favor of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy. However, data from clinical trials evaluating NAC for patients undergoing bladder-sparing treatments are less robust, so this strategy remains controversial. The response to NAC is prognostic and patients with favorable pathological response have better overall survival. Strategies to select patients based on molecular biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment decisions and even de-intensify treatment, avoiding local treatment for those with complete responses to systemic therapy. This review outlines the current literature on the use of NAC in the context of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, highlights neoadjuvant studies in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC, and discusses novel bladder-preservation strategies, including multimodality combinations and biomarker-driven studies of definitive chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Girardi
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Pooja Ghatalia
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Gopa Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON
| | - Andrea B Apolo
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Neuzillet Y, Audenet F, Loriot Y, Allory Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Leon P, Pradère B, Seisen T, Traxer O, Xylinas E, Roumiguié M, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1141-1163. [PMID: 36400480 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC and MIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS MIBC is diagnosed after the most complete tumour resection possible. MIBC grading is based on CTU along with chest CT. Multiparametric pelvic MRI could be an alternative. Cystectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy is the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in good general health with satisfactory renal function. Enterocystoplasty is proposed in men and women in the absence of contraindications and when the urethral resection is negative on extemporaneous examination. Otherwise, transileal cutaneous ureterostomy is the recommended method of urinary diversion. Inclusion of all patients in an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is recommended. For metastatic MIBC, first line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (GC or MVAC) is recommended, if general health (PS>1) and renal function (clearance>60mL/min) so allow (only 50% of the cases). Pembrolizumab immunotherapy has demonstrated an overall survival benefit in second-line treatment. CONCLUSION Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and decision-making concerning MIBC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, institut Curie, université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, université Paris Cité, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urologie, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, urologie, hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urologie, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Refining neoadjuvant therapy clinical trial design for muscle-invasive bladder cancer before cystectomy: a joint US Food and Drug Administration and Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network workshop. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:37-46. [PMID: 34508246 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00505-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The success of the use of novel therapies in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma has contributed to growing interest in evaluating these therapies at earlier stages of the disease. However, trials evaluating these therapies in the neoadjuvant setting must have clearly defined study elements and appropriately selected end points to ensure the applicability of the trial and enable interpretation of the study results. To advance the development of rational trial design, a public workshop jointly sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network convened in August 2019. Clinicians, clinical trialists, radiologists, biostatisticians, patients, advocates and other stakeholders discussed key elements and end points when designing trials of neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), identifying opportunities to refine eligibility, design and end points for neoadjuvant trials in MIBC. Although pathological complete response (pCR) is already being used as a co-primary end point, both individual-level and trial-level surrogacy for time-to-event end points, such as event-free survival or overall survival, remain incompletely characterized in MIBC. Additionally, use of pCR is limited by heterogeneity in pathological evaluation and the fact that the magnitude of pCR improvement that might translate into a meaningful clinical benefit remains unclear. Given existing knowledge gaps, capture of highly granular patient-related, tumour-related and treatment-related characteristics in the current generation of neoadjuvant MIBC trials will be critical to informing the design of future trials.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bladder-Sparing Approaches to Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
21
|
Abstract
The purpose of this study covered the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients through previously published literature. Through 30 September, 2019, the PubMed database was searched for eligible articles that evaluated PET/CT imaging in bladder cancer patients. In general, FDG PET/CT, the most commonly used PET/CT imaging, does not show good performance for the detection of primary lesions; however, according to the literature it could accurately assess pelvic lymph node (LN) status better than other imaging technologies and it was especially helpful in determining extra-pelvic recurrences. More recently, non-FDG PET/CT imaging, such as C-11 acetate and C-11 choline, has been introduced. Although further research is required, preliminary results show the potential of these techniques to overcome the drawbacks of FDG. This concise study will overview the role of PET/CT when treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok-Ki Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peak TC, Hemal A. Partial cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a review of the literature. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 9:2938-2945. [PMID: 33457266 PMCID: PMC7807374 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is one of the most morbid and complex urologic procedures performed today. To avoid these complications, the partial cystectomy (PC) has been offered as an alternative in carefully selected patients as a means of achieving equal oncologic efficacy with less morbidity. Selection criteria should include solitary tumors without concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) and amenable to resection with 1–2 cm margins in a normally functioning bladder. In addition to the standard work-up, random bladder and prostatic biopsies may be performed. The PC can be performed through an open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted approach, each with acceptable outcomes. A number of techniques have been developed to identify and resect the tumor completely with negative margins, while preventing tumor spillage within the abdomen. While there are no randomized trials, single institution series have demonstrated acceptable oncologic outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Therefore, offering PC in the appropriate candidate, including those patients who do not accept or are unfit for the associated morbidity of a RC, represents an acceptable alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor C Peak
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ashok Hemal
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clinical Trials in Bladder and Upper Tract Cancer – Bladder Cancer Disease States. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Ajib K, Tjong MC, Tan GH, Nason GJ, Berjaoui MB, Erlich A, Maganti M, Sridhar SS, Fleshner NE, Zlotta AR, Catton C, Berlin A, Chung P, Kulkarni GS. Canadian experience of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on bladder recurrences in patients managed with trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:404-410. [PMID: 32569566 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bladder preservation with trimodal therapy (TMT) has emerged as a feasible alternative to radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was proven to cause pathological downstaging. For this reason, we evaluated whether receipt of NAC decreases local bladder recurrences in TMT patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed our TMT database for all patients treated between 2003 and 2017. Patients were treated with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by chemotherapy/radiotherapy with or without NAC. Baseline demographic and tumor characteristics were recorded. Rates of local and systemic recurrence were analyzed per receipt of NAC. Overall recurrence-free survival (RFS) and bladder (b)RFS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modelling. RESULTS Median age and followup periods were 72 years and 3.6 years, respectively. Fifty-four patients had NAC and concurrent chemoradiation (NAC-TMT) vs. 70 patients who had concurrent chemoradiation only (TMT). Carcinoma in situ (CIS) was present in 31% of the patients in NAC-TMT group compared to 24% in TMT group (p=0.40). After treatment, 24 (44%) and 31 (44%) patients in NAC-TMT and TMT groups, respectively, had bladder tumor recurrence. Overall RFS at three years was 46% and 50% in NAC-TMT and TMT groups, respectively (p=0.70). BRFS at three years was 55% and 69% in NAC-TMT and TMT groups, respectively (p=0.27). Multivariable analyses found that the presence of concomitant CIS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13; 95% confidence interval CI 1.06-4.27; p=0.0036) was the primary factor associated with local bladder recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of NAC does not obviate the risk of bladder recurrence post-TMT. Patients with CIS should be monitored especially closely for local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ajib
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael C Tjong
- Department of Radiation Oncology of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Guan Hee Tan
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gregory J Nason
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mohamad Baker Berjaoui
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annette Erlich
- Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Manjula Maganti
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles Catton
- Department of Radiation Oncology of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nassiri N, Ghodoussipour S, Maas M, Nazemi A, Asanad K, Pearce S, Bhanvadia SS, Djaladat H, Schuckman A, Daneshmand S. Occult Nodal Metastases in Patients Down-Staged to Nonmuscle Invasive Disease Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Urology 2020; 142:155-160. [PMID: 32268173 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the risk of occult nodal metastasis in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who exhibit a complete or partial clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and assess a potential role for "bladder sparing" management given that the gold standard treatment, radical cystectomy (RC), is associated with high morbidity. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database for bladder cancer from 2004 to 2013 including patients with cT2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer who underwent multiagent NAC followed by RC and pelvic lymphadenectomy and excluding patients with nonurothelial predominant histology and those undergoing partial cystectomy. Student's t test was used to evaluate patients' demographics, presence of co-morbid conditions, and pathologic findings, notably the presence of lymphovascular invasion and variant histology. RESULTS We identified 17,917 patients who underwent RC. Of these, 14.9% (n = 2673) received NAC before RC. About 13.1% and 14.5% of patients had complete (ypT0) and partial (ypTa, Tis, and T1) pathologic response, respectively. These 14.7% of cT2, 9.0% of cT3, and 6.9% of cT4 patients exhibited pT0 status on final pathology. And 4.9% of complete and 5.4% of partial responders demonstrated occult nodal metastases. Age, sex, ethnicity, the presence of co-morbidities, LVI, and variant histology were not significantly associated with occult nodal metastasis. CONCLUSION While bladder preservation may be a viable option in patients who are carefully selected and closely followed after NAC, patients undergoing NAC may be at risk of occult disease outside of the bladder despite an otherwise clinical complete response diagnosed with cross-sectional imaging, cystoscopy, TURBT, and cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Nassiri
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Marissa Maas
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Azadeh Nazemi
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kian Asanad
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Shane Pearce
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sumeet S Bhanvadia
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anne Schuckman
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hayashi Y, Fujita K. A new era in the detection of urothelial carcinoma by sequencing cell-free DNA. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8:S497-S501. [PMID: 32042630 PMCID: PMC6989842 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yujiro Hayashi
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ajib K, Kulkarni GS. Editorial comment: bladder preservation as a treatment strategy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 7:S723-S726. [PMID: 30687607 PMCID: PMC6323270 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ajib
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Audenet F, Waingankar N, Ferket BS, Niglio SA, Marqueen KE, Sfakianos JP, Galsky MD. Effectiveness of Transurethral Resection plus Systemic Chemotherapy as Definitive Treatment for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Population Level Data. J Urol 2018; 200:996-1004. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Nikhil Waingankar
- Department of Urology, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Bart S. Ferket
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Scot A. Niglio
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn E. Marqueen
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - John P. Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Matthew D. Galsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hermans TJN, Voskuilen CS, van der Heijden MS, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Kassouf W, Seiler R, Kamat AM, Grivas P, Kiltie AE, Black PC, van Rhijn BWG. Neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The past, the present, and the future. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:413-422. [PMID: 29128420 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Revised: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately half of patients who undergo radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) will succumb to metastatic disease. We summarize the evidence for neoadjuvant radiation (NAR), chemo (NAC), and immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibition) prior to RC for MIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were obtained by a search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases for English language articles published from 1925 up to 2017. RESULTS NAC usage has increased over the last decade, while NAR is rarely administered. Although NAR results in downstaging, its impact on survival is inconclusive. Based on level I evidence, cisplatin-based NAC (CB-NAC) is considered standard of care in cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC. NAC results in a 6% absolute 10-year overall survival (OS) benefit. In-depth analyses of key randomized controlled trials showed that failure to correct for uniform staging, surgical variation, and patient selection compromises the ability to identify factors predictive of response to NAC. The benefit appears to be restricted to patients downstaged to ypT1N0 or less. In these patients, 5-year OS is 80% to 90%. Regarding a number needed to treat of 17, most patients with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC will be exposed to toxicity without benefit. Possible approaches to reduce overtreatment are suggested in this article and include patient selection, the chosen NAC regimen, and emerging molecular data to predict responsiveness to NAC. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is a promising future perspective currently under investigation. CONCLUSIONS Past studies on NAR show inconclusive results and NAR is rarely administered. Instead, CB-NAC is advised in eligible patients with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC prior to RC. In the near future, predictive biomarkers will be the key to tailor the use of CB-NAC and reduce harm to nonresponders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom J N Hermans
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Urology, Schön-Klinik, Nürnberg/Fürth, Germany
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ornstein MC, Diaz-Montero CM, Rayman P, Elson P, Haywood S, Finke JH, Kim JS, Pavicic PG, Lamenza M, Devonshire S, Dann P, Schach K, Stephenson A, Campbell S, Emamekhoo H, Ernstoff MS, Hoimes CJ, Gilligan TD, Rini BI, Garcia JA, Grivas P. Myeloid-derived suppressors cells (MDSC) correlate with clinicopathologic factors and pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergoing cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:405-412. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
31
|
Panebianco V, Narumi Y, Altun E, Bochner BH, Efstathiou JA, Hafeez S, Huddart R, Kennish S, Lerner S, Montironi R, Muglia VF, Salomon G, Thomas S, Vargas HA, Witjes JA, Takeuchi M, Barentsz J, Catto JWF. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System). Eur Urol 2018; 74:294-306. [PMID: 29755006 PMCID: PMC6690492 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 398] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Management of bladder cancer (BC) is primarily driven by stage, grade, and biological potential. Knowledge of each is derived using clinical, histopathological, and radiological investigations. This multimodal approach reduces the risk of error from one particular test, but may present a staging dilemma when results conflict. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may improve patient care through imaging of the bladder with better resolution of the tissue planes than computed tomography and without radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE To define a standardized approach to imaging and reporting mpMRI for BC, by developing a VI-RADS score. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We created VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System) through consensus using existing literature. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We describe standard imaging protocols and reporting criteria (including size, location, multiplicity, and morphology) for bladder mpMRI. We propose a five-point VI-RADS score, derived using T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast enhancement, which suggests the risks of muscle invasion. We include sample images used to understand VI-RADS. CONCLUSIONS We hope that VI-RADS will standardize reporting, facilitate comparisons between patients, and in future years, will be tested and refined if necessary. While we do not advocate mpMRI for all patients with BC, this imaging may compliment pathology or reduce radiation-based imaging. Bladder mpMRI may be most useful in patients with non-muscle-invasive cancers, in expediting radical treatment or for determining response to bladder-sparing approaches. PATIENT SUMMARY Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for bladder cancer are becoming more common and may provide accurate information that helps improve patient care. Here, we describe a standardized reporting criterion for bladder MRI. This should improve communication between doctors and allow better comparisons between patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
| | - Yoshifumi Narumi
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ersan Altun
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Robert Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Steve Kennish
- Department of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Seth Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | - Valdair F Muglia
- Imaging Division, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini Clinic, University Clinic Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle Barentsz
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Iyer G, Balar AV, Milowsky MI, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Herr HW, Huang WC, Taneja SS, Woods M, Ostrovnaya I, Al-Ahmadie H, Arcila ME, Riches JC, Meier A, Bourque C, Shady M, Won H, Rose TL, Kim WY, Kania BE, Boyd ME, Cipolla CK, Regazzi AM, Delbeau D, McCoy AS, Vargas HA, Berger MF, Solit DB, Rosenberg JE, Bajorin DF. Multicenter Prospective Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1949-1956. [PMID: 29742009 PMCID: PMC6049398 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is a standard of care for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Dose-dense cisplatin-based regimens have yielded favorable outcomes compared with standard-dose chemotherapy, yet the optimal neoadjuvant regimen remains undefined. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense gemcitabine and cisplatin (ddGC) in patients with MIBC. Patients and Methods In this prospective, multicenter phase II study, patients received ddGC (gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) every 2 weeks for 6 cycles followed by RC. The primary end point was pathologic downstaging to non-muscle-invasive disease (< pT2N0). Patients who did not undergo RC were deemed nonresponders. Pretreatment tumors underwent next-generation sequencing to identify predictors of chemosensitivity. Results Forty-nine patients were enrolled from three institutions. The primary end point was met, with 57% of 46 evaluable patients downstaged to < pT2N0. Pathologic response correlated with improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Nineteen patients (39%) required toxicity-related dose modifications. Sixty-seven percent of patients completed all six planned cycles. No patient failed to undergo RC as a result of chemotherapy-associated toxicities. The most frequent treatment-related toxicity was anemia (12%; grade 3). The presence of a presumed deleterious DNA damage response (DDR) gene alteration was associated with chemosensitivity (positive predictive value for < pT2N0 [89%]). No patient with a deleterious DDR gene alteration has experienced recurrence at a median follow-up of 2 years. Conclusion Six cycles of ddGC is an active, well-tolerated neoadjuvant regimen for the treatment of patients with MIBC. The presence of a putative deleterious DDR gene alteration in pretreatment tumor tissue strongly predicted for chemosensitivity, durable response, and superior long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gopa Iyer
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Arjun V. Balar
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S. Machele Donat
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Harry W. Herr
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - William C. Huang
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Samir S. Taneja
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael Woods
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Irina Ostrovnaya
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Maria E. Arcila
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jamie C. Riches
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Andreas Meier
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Caitlin Bourque
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Maha Shady
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Helen Won
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Tracy L. Rose
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - William Y. Kim
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brooke E. Kania
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mariel E. Boyd
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Catharine K. Cipolla
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ashley M. Regazzi
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Daniela Delbeau
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Asia S. McCoy
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David B. Solit
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan E. Rosenberg
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Dean F. Bajorin
- Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Irina Ostrovnaya, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Maria E. Arcila, Jamie C. Riches, Andreas Meier, Caitlin Bourque, Maha Shady, Helen Won, Brooke E. Kania, Mariel E. Boyd, Catharine K. Cipolla, Ashley M. Regazzi, Asia S. McCoy, Hebert Alberto Vargas, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, and Dean F. Bajorin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, S. Machele Donat, Harry W. Herr, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, David B. Solit, and Dean F. Bajorin, Weill Cornell Medical College; Arjun V. Balar, William C. Huang, Samir S. Taneja, and Daniela Delbeau, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael Woods, Tracy L. Rose, and William Y. Kim, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mazza P, Moran GW, Li G, Robins DJ, Matulay JT, Herr HW, Decastro GJ, McKiernan JM, Anderson CB. Conservative Management Following Complete Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Contemporary Outcomes of a Multi-Institutional Cohort Study. J Urol 2018; 200:1005-1013. [PMID: 29787740 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the outcomes in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer from 2 institutions who experienced a clinically complete response to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy and elected active surveillance. It was unknown whether conservative treatment could be safely implemented in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer at our institutions who elected surveillance following a clinically complete response to transurethral resection of bladder tumors and neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2001 to 2017. A clinically complete response was defined as absent tumor on post-chemotherapy transurethral resection of bladder tumor, negative cytology and normal cross-sectional imaging. RESULTS In the 148 patients followed a median of 55 months (range 5 to 145) the 5-year disease specific, overall, cystectomy-free and recurrence-free survival rates were 90%, 86%, 76% and 64%, respectively. Of the patients 71 (48%) experienced recurrence in the bladder, including 16 (11%) with muscle invasive disease and 55 (37%) with noninvasive disease. Salvage radical cystectomy prevented cancer specific death in 9 of 12 patients (75%) who underwent cystectomy after muscle invasive relapse and in 13 of 14 (93%) after noninvasive relapse. CONCLUSIONS We observed high rates of overall and disease specific survival with bladder preservation in patients who achieved a clinically complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These outcomes support the safety of active surveillance in carefully selected, closely monitored patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Future studies should aim to improve patient selection by identifying biomarkers predicting invasive relapse and developing novel imaging methods of early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Mazza
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - George W Moran
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Gen Li
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Dennis J Robins
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Justin T Matulay
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Harry W Herr
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guarionex J Decastro
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - James M McKiernan
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher B Anderson
- Department of Urology, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
6 - Terapia Trimodale Nel Trattamento Conservativo Della Neoplasia Vescicale. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 104:S23-S27. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891618766109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
35
|
Outcomes Following Clinical Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder in Patients Refusing Radical Cystectomy. Urology 2018; 111:116-121. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
36
|
Bladder-Sparing Treatments. Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00027-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
37
|
Ha YS, Kim TH. The Surveillance for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Bladder Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809939-1.00030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
38
|
Moran GW, Li G, Robins DJ, Matulay JT, McKiernan JM, Anderson CB. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Chemotherapy with Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors as Definitive Therapy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2017; 3:245-258. [PMID: 29152549 PMCID: PMC5676763 DOI: 10.3233/blc-170134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Bladder-sparing treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with systemic chemotherapy plus transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) is increasingly seen in the literature –both in case series and subanalyses of patients who opt out of or are unfit for radical cystectomy (RC). Survival outcomes among these patients are often impressive, but these are typically small retrospective studies from single institutions and therefore of limited clinical value. Objectives: Our aim is to summarize the literature regarding definitive treatment of MIBC with systemic chemotherapy plus TURBT and provide a meta-analysis of survival outcomes for patients who received this treatment. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed consistent with the Prisma statement to identify publications reporting the outcomes of patients treated with TURBT and systemic chemotherapy as definitive treatment for locally confined MIBC. Identified studies were screened in a two-stage process: first by title and abstract; then by full-text reading. 18 publications (518 patients) were included in the qualitative systematic review and 10 publications (266 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Results: Overall survival ranged from 20% to 87.5% across studies at median follow-up ranging 4 to 120 months. 5-year survival rate for all patients included in the meta-analysis was estimated to be 72% [95% CI: 64%, 82%]. Conclusions: Definitive treatment with systemic chemotherapy plus TURBT can lead to favorable survival outcomes in select patients. Further study to improve patient selection for this method of treatment is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George W Moran
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gen Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis J Robins
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin T Matulay
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M McKiernan
- Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 44:224-233. [PMID: 27565154 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3500-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM A small number of studies evaluated the detection rate of lesions from bladder carcinoma (BC) of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the restaging process. However, the prognostic role of FDG PET/CT still remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy, the effect upon treatment decision, and the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrent BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-one patients affected by BC underwent FDG PET/CT for restaging purpose. The diagnostic accuracy of visually interpreted FDG PET/CT was assessed compared to histology (n = 8), other diagnostic imaging modalities (contrast-enhanced CT in 38/41 patients and MRI in 15/41) and clinical follow-up (n = 41). Semiquantitative PET values (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUL, MTV, TLG) were calculated using a graph-based method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier curves. The risk of progression (hazard ratio, HR) was computed by Cox regression analysis by considering all the available variables. RESULTS PET was considered positive in 21 of 41 patients. Of these, recurrent BC was confirmed in 20 (95 %). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 87 %, 94 %, 95 %, 85 %, 90 %. AUC was 0.9 (95 %IC 0.8-1). Bayesian positive and negative likelihood ratios were 14.5 and 0.13, respectively. FDG PET/CT findings modified the therapeutic approach in 16 patients (modified therapy in 10 PET-positive patients, watch-and-wait in six PET-negative patients). PFS was significantly longer in patients with negative scan vs. those with pathological findings (85 % vs. 24 %, p < 0.05; HR = 12.4; p = 0.001). Moreover, an unremarkable study was associated with a longer OS (88 % vs. 47 % after 2 years and 87 % vs. 25 % after 3 years, respectively, p < 0.05). Standardized uptake value (SUV)max > 6 and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) > 8.5 were recognized as the most accurate thresholds to predict PFS (2-year PFS 62 % for SUVmax < 6 vs. 15 % for SUVmax > 6, p = 0.018; 2-year PFS 66 % for TLG < 8.5 vs. 18 % for TLG > 8.5, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION A very good diagnostic performance for FDG PET/CT was confirmed in patients with suspected recurrent BC. FDG PET/CT allowed for a change in treatment decision in about 40 % of cases and showed an important prognostic value in assessing PFS and OS.
Collapse
|
40
|
Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, Hernández V, Espinós EL, Dunn J, Rouanne M, Neuzillet Y, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG, Gakis G, Ribal MJ. Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2016; 71:462-475. [PMID: 27375033 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1097] [Impact Index Per Article: 121.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Invasive bladder cancer is a frequently occurring disease with a high mortality rate despite optimal treatment. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Guidelines are updated yearly and provides information to optimise diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of this patient population. OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the EAU guidelines for physicians and patients confronted with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international multidisciplinary panel of bladder cancer experts reviewed and discussed the results of a comprehensive literature search of several databases covering all sections of the guidelines. The panel defined levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to an established classification system. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Epidemiology and aetiology of bladder cancer are discussed. The proper diagnostic pathway, including demands for pathology and imaging, is outlined. Several treatment options, including bladder-sparing treatments and combinations of treatment modalities (different forms of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) are described. Sequencing of these modalities is discussed. Potential indications and contraindications, such as comorbidity, are related to treatment choice. There is a new paragraph on organ-sparing approaches, both in men and in women, and on minimal invasive surgery. Recommendations for chemotherapy in fit and unfit patients are provided including second-line options. Finally, a follow-up schedule is provided. CONCLUSIONS The current summary of the EAU Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Guidelines provides an up-to-date overview of the available literature and evidence dealing with diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is an important disease with a high mortality rate. These updated guidelines help clinicians refine the diagnosis and select the appropriate therapy and follow-up for patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Thierry Lebret
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpetrière, UPMC, Paris, France
| | - Nigel C Cowan
- Radiology Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- University of Warwick, Cancer Research Unit, Coventry, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Harman Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Hernández
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - James Dunn
- Department of Urology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Hôpital Foch, Department of Urology, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bellmunt J, Mottet N, De Santis M. Urothelial carcinoma management in elderly or unfit patients. EJC Suppl 2016; 14:1-20. [PMID: 27358584 PMCID: PMC4917740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Revised: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquim Bellmunt
- Bladder Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, CHU de Saint-Etienne, University Jean Monnet, St Etienne, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Öztürk H. Comparing RECIST with EORTC criteria in metastatic bladder cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016; 142:187-94. [PMID: 26208817 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2022-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare RECIST and EORTC criteria in an evaluation of response to therapy in metastatic bladder cancer and to assess their influence on decisions to administer additional therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 42 untreated patients (38 male, 4 female) with metastatic bladder cancer were included in the study, which took place between July 2007 and April 2013. The mean age was 66.1 ± 9.93 years (range 41-84 years). A total of 144 metastatic foci were evaluated using multislice CT and (18)FDG-PET/CT before and after first-line chemotherapy. The locations, sizes, numbers and SUV(max) of the metastatic foci before and after chemotherapy were recorded, and the response to therapy was evaluated separately using RECIST and EORTC criteria, after which a statistical comparison was made. RESULTS According to the RECIST and EORTC criteria, the rate of complete remission (CR) was 9.5 and 16.6 %, the rate of partial remission (PR) was 28.6 and 40.5 %, the rate of stable disease (SD) was 23.8 and 14.3 %, and the rate of progressive disease (PD) was 31.0 and 28.6 %, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 38.1 versus 57.1 %, respectively, and there were no differences between the two criteria in terms of their detection of progressive disease. The rate of SD was higher with RECIST criteria; however, the difference between the two criteria was not significant in terms of PR and CR. CONCLUSION A group of patients that had been determined as having a SD according to RECIST criteria were grouped as PR and/or CR according to EORTC criteria. Additional chemotherapy protocols can be used in second-line chemotherapy and/or cisplatin-resistant patients, according to RECIST criteria. In evaluating the response to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer, EORTC criteria, using (18)FDG-PET/CT scans, can be considered as a more applicable and accurate diagnostic tool. The anatomical findings obtained through imaging methods and from functional/metabolic data obtained by PET/CT can be useful in the planning of second- or third-line chemotherapy, and a high accuracy in re-staging can spare patients from second-line or even third-line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Öztürk
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sifa University, Izmir, Turkey.
- Basmane Hospital of Sifa University, Fevzipasa Boulevard No: 172/2, Basmane, 35240, Konak, Izmir, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tyson MD, Chang SS, Keegan KA. Role of consolidative surgical therapy in patients with locally advanced or regionally metastatic bladder cancer. Bladder (San Franc) 2016; 3:e26. [PMID: 28261632 PMCID: PMC5336315 DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2016.89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (RC/PLND) on the survival of patients with locally advanced and/or regionally metastatic bladder cancer is unknown. However, emerging evidence suggests that there may be survival benefit to a subset of select patients with this disease who demonstrate a response to chemotherapy. This article will review the current literature on the role of RC/PLND in the consolidative treatment of locally advanced and regionally metastatic bladder cancer.
Collapse
|
44
|
Aykan S, Yuruk E, Tuken M, Temiz MZ, Ozsoy S. Rare but Lethal Disease of Childhood: Metastatic, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Pediatr Rep 2015; 7:5928. [PMID: 26500746 PMCID: PMC4594445 DOI: 10.4081/pr.2015.5928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Revised: 06/07/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of urinary tract and the seventh most common cancer in men with the peak incidence in the sixth decade of life. Our knowledge about bladder tumors in pediatric age group mainly relies on case series. The reported cases are mostly low grade and non-muscle invasive. We herein present a case of a 17-year-old male with metastatic high-grade muscle-invasive bladder cancer who was presented with macroscopic hematuria and flank pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Aykan
- Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
| | - Emrah Yuruk
- Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
| | - Murat Tuken
- Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul
| | | | - Sule Ozsoy
- Department of Pathology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Haddad A, Lotan Y, Sagalowsky AI. Partial cystectomy. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
46
|
Solsona E, Herr HW. Radical transurethral resection. Bladder Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118674826.ch18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
47
|
Goonewardene SS, Bahl A, Persad R. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Clinical and cost effectiveness. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415814554334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with associated significant mortality. Once proven to be muscle invasive, radical therapy is required. Objective: We reviewed the literature associated with clinical effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of papers related to the search terms neoadjuvant chemotherapy, muscle invasive bladder cancer and clinical effectiveness; from 1984 through April 2014. We used the search terms of (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) AND (muscle invasive bladder cancer). We included primary research, but only included secondary research if it was a systematic review or meta-analyses. Papers outside this category were not included. Results: From the literature review, we found that the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer are wide-ranging. This includes a greatly improved response rate, including complete response and improved survival rate. Potential disadvantages of NAC include less accurate staging, delays in curative surgery (risk is greater, if delay > 12 weeks) in non-responders and the well-known fact that non-responders will fare worse, later on. Conclusions: In conclusion, NAC followed by radical therapy is the gold standard for muscle-invasive bladder tumours, for patients whom are sufficiently fit; however, there are many unanswered questions. As yet, this intervention has not been examined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amit Bahl
- North Bristol National Health Service Trust, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- North Bristol National Health Service Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, Mohammed K, Thompson A, Kumar P, Khoo V, Van As N, Eeles R, Dearnaley D, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1626-35. [PMID: 25897675 PMCID: PMC4430712 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2014] [Revised: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) aims to offer organ preservation without oncological compromise. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy provides survival advantage; response may guide patient selection for bladder preservation and identify those most likely to have favourable result with radiotherapy. METHODS Ninety-four successive patients with T2-T4aN0M0 bladder cancer treated between January 2000 and June 2011 were analysed at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Patients received platinum-based chemotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumour; repeat cystoscopy (± biopsy) was performed to guide subsequent management. Responders were treated with radiotherapy. Poor responders were recommended radical cystectomy. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS Response assessment was performed in 89 patients. Seventy-eight (88%) demonstrated response; 53 (60%) achieved complete response (CR); 74 responders had radiotherapy; 4 opted for cystectomy. Eleven (12%) demonstrated poor response, 10 received cystectomy. Median survival for CR was 90 months (95% CI 64.7, 115.9) compared with 16 months (95% CI 5.4, 27.4; P < 0.001) poor responders. On multivariate analysis, only response was associated with significantly improved PFS, OS and DSS. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 4-127 months), 14 patients (16%) required salvage cystectomy (8 for non-muscle invasive disease, 5 for invasive recurrence, 1 for radiotherapy related toxicity). In all, 82% had an intact bladder at last follow-up after radiotherapy; 67% had an intact bladder at last follow-up or death. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is a favourable prognostic indicator and can be used to select patients for radiotherapy allowing bladder preservation in >80% of the selected patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Cystectomy/methods
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Organ Preservation/methods
- Retrospective Studies
- Salvage Therapy/methods
- Treatment Outcome
- Urinary Bladder/drug effects
- Urinary Bladder/pathology
- Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
- Urinary Bladder/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Horwich
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Omar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Mohammed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Eeles
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Terrisse S, Doucet L, Pouessel D, Gauthier H, le Maignan C, Teixeira L, Pfister C, Culine S. Quelle chimiothérapie périopératoire pour les tumeurs de vessie infiltrant le muscle ? ONCOLOGIE 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-015-2510-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many cases radical cystectomy is not feasible in patients suffering from muscle-invasive bladder cancer due to advanced age of the patient or limiting comorbidities which increase the perioperative risk. A further group of patients decline radical cystectomy due to potential postoperative complications and the resulting impairment in the quality of life. OBJECTIVES This article provides an overview of alternative therapeutic concepts to radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved a database analysis and gives a discussion of clinical trials concerning alternative therapeutic concepts for muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment strategies. RESULTS Transurethral resection, open partial cystectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and combined therapeutic regimens are available as alternatives to radical cystectomy. CONCLUSION Radical cystectomy is the accepted standard of care in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer but in selected patients, established alternative methods can also be offered. A comprehensive patient information and counseling is therefore necessary to find the best therapeutic option in each individual case. Salvage cystectomy is a therapeutic option in cases of failure of organ-preserving treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Niedworok
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Deutschland,
| | | |
Collapse
|