Hepatitis B virus reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy-enhanced viral replication precedes overt hepatitis

Cross-sectional study of hepatitis B virus infection in female breast cancer patients in China for the first time diagnosed

BACKGROUND

The correlation between breast cancer and hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains inconclusive. This study aims to explore the serological status of HBV infection and past infection in different age groups of female breast cancer patients, patients with benign breast diseases, and individuals undergoing routine physical examinations.

METHODS

Serum data on HBV serological markers were collected and analyzed from 6072 female breast cancer patients first diagnosed from September 2012 to July 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, along with 4019 women with benign breast diseases and 54,740 healthy females undergoing routine physical examinations in the same period. The data were stratified by age for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HBV infection and past infection in the breast cancer group (7.9%, 55.1%) was higher than that in the benign breast disease group (6.5%, 39.1%) and the healthy females group(5.0%, 17.6%);the rate of only HBV surface antibody positivity (HBsAb ( +)) in the breast cancer group (10.3%) was lower than that in the benign breast disease group (26.9%) and the healthy females group (49.2%), with significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.05). Stratified by age, the prevalence of HBV infection in the breast cancer group (8%, 8.9%) and benign breast disease group (7.75%, 8.1%)was higher than that in the healthy females group (4.5%, 6.3%) in the 30-39 and 40-49 age group, respectively. The past infection rate of HBV in the breast cancer group (24.8%, 45.0%) was higher than that in the benign breast disease group (16.1%, 35.4%) in the ≤ 29 and 30-39 age group, respectively.. The past infection rate of HBV in the breast cancer group was higher than that in the healthy females group in all age groups, while the rate of only HBsAb ( +) in the breast cancer group was lower than that in the benign breast disease group and the routine physical examination group in all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer women and women with benign breast diseases have higher rates of hepatitis B virus infection and previous infections, with more significant differences among middle-aged women. Breast cancer women and women with benign breast diseases have lower rates of only HBsAb ( +) for HBV.

Hepatotoxicity during legacy cancer chemotherapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The rates and causes of significant hepatotoxicity with cancer chemotherapy (CCT) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We compared rates of grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, defined as elevated transaminases, during CCT in patients who are mono-infected with HCV compared with rates in controls matched on demographics, diagnosis, and rituximab use. We excluded patients with hepatobiliary cancers, hepatitis B virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Hepatotoxicity was attributed to a medical cause, cancer progression, or CCT, including HCV flare.

RESULTS

Patients with HCV (n = 196) had a higher rate of cirrhosis than the 1,130 matched controls (21.9% versus 4%; P <0.001). Their higher rate of overall hepatotoxicity (8.7% versus 4.5% of controls, P = 0.01) was due to higher rate of CCT-related hepatotoxicity (4.1% versus 1.2%, P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the largest risk factor for overall hepatotoxicity was cirrhosis, and the only risk factor for CCT-related hepatotoxicity was HCV infection. Among those with HCV, the only significant risk factor for hepatotoxicity was rituximab use. Hepatotoxicity caused by CCT delayed or altered treatment in only 3 HCV patients and 1 control (1.5% versus 0.1%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with HCV can safely be treated with cancer chemotherapy. Cirrhosis and HCV infection contributed to increased hepatotoxicity in subjects on CCT. Among HCV patients, rituximab use was the major risk factor for increased hepatotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity due to CCT itself rarely altered or delayed CCT. Nonetheless, HCV-positive patients should be monitored carefully during CCT.

Identification of Novel Breast Cancer Genes based on Gene Expression Profiles and PPI Data

Background:

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, and a threat to female health all over the world. However, the molecular mechanism of breast cancer has not been fully discovered yet.

Objective:

It is crucial to identify breast cancer-related genes, which could provide new biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis as well as potential treatment targets.

Methods:

Here we used the minimum redundancy-maximum relevance (mRMR) method to select significant genes, then mapped the transcripts of the genes on the Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network and traced the shortest path between each pair of two proteins.

Results:

As a result, we identified 24 breast cancer-related genes whose betweenness were over 700. The GO enrichment analysis indicated that the transcription and oxygen level are very important in breast cancer. And the pathway analysis indicated that most of these 24 genes are enriched in prostate cancer, endocrine resistance, and pathways in cancer.

Conclusion:

We hope these 24 genes might be useful for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment for breast cancer.

Changes of HBV DNA After Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Efficacy of Antiviral Treatment

Unlike systemic chemotherapy for hematological malignancies with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has only recently been reported to cause HBV reactivation and subsequent hepatitis. Most patients with HBV-related HCC have an underlying disease with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis, and TACE may potentially induce HBV reactivation and liver decompensation. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines for managing TACE-caused HBV reactivation. In this review, we summarize the changes of HBV status and liver function after TACE and the effect of antiviral treatment before, during, or after TACE.

High titers of anti-HBs prevent rituximab-related viral reactivation in resolved hepatitis B patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is associated with an increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for rituximab-related HBV reactivation in resolved hepatitis B patients, defined as HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive, and undetectable HBV DNA. Among 840 consecutive patients with CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma who received rituximab-based chemotherapy from 2003 through 2014 at Seoul National University Hospital, 732 patients were excluded because either anti-HBc was not assessed or they were HBsAg-seropositive. This retrospective study included 108 resolved hepatitis B patients. During a median 33.5-month follow-up period, eight cases of HBV reactivation occurred only among the patients with low anti-HBs titers (<100 mIU/ml) at baseline and those who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis. Using multivariate analyses, antiviral prophylaxis and baseline anti-HBs titers were the protective factors for HBV reactivation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 and 0.95, respectively). Among those who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis, patients with high baseline anti-HBs (≥100 mIU/ml) experienced significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation (HR, 0.49; P = 0.006) than the patients with low baseline anti-HBs (<100 mIU/ml) whose cumulative HBV reactivation rates at 6 and 24 months after chemotherapy were 8.3% and 17.3%, respectively. High anti-HBs titer at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis prevented HBV reactivation, suggesting antiviral prophylaxis should be considered according to baseline anti-HBs titer. Meticulous follow-up for ALT and HBV DNA without antiviral prophylaxis might be possible for the patients with high baseline anti-HBs (≥100 mIU/ml).

Prophylactic Effect of Lamivudine for Chemotherapy-Induced Hepatitis B Reactivation in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Three strategies using lamivudine have been proposed to prevent chemotherapy-induced HBV (hepatitis B virus) reactivation in the clinical setting. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of the early preemptive strategy, deferred preemptive strategy and therapeutic strategy in patients with HBsAg-positive breast cancer during chemotherapy.

Methods

Clinical studies published from database inception until Nov 1, 2014, were included for analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival, rate of chemotherapy disruption and virological and clinical reactivation. The secondary outcomes were the rates of HBV-related chemotherapy disruption, HBV-related mortality, YMDD mutations and withdrawal hepatitis.

Results

Four hundred and thirty patients in four studies that compared the early preemptive strategy with a therapeutic strategy were included. Application of early preemptive lamivudine was superior in reducing HBV recurrence (pooled OR: 0.12, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.31, P< 0.0001), the incidence of HBV-related hepatitis (pooled OR: 0.13, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.37, P< 0.0001) and the rate of chemotherapy disruption (pooled OR: 0.37, 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.60, P< 0.0001). In these two groups, no significant difference was found in overall mortality (P = 0.32), YMDD mutant rate (P = 0.13) or incidence of withdrawal hepatitis (P = 0.38). Of the two studies that compared the efficacy of an early and a deferred preemptive strategy, one showed that an early preemptive strategy significantly reduced the incidence of hepatitis (P = 0.046), whereas the other showed no significant difference (P = 0.7).

Conclusions

An early preemptive strategy is superior to a therapeutic strategy in decreasing the incidence of HBV reactivation, incidence of HBV-related hepatitis and rate of chemotherapy disruption in patients with breast cancer. A deferred preemptive strategy might be an alternative approach to controlling viral replication.

Acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B: the dilemma of differentiation from acute viral hepatitis B

Exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B are common in endemic countries. Acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB-AE) causing derangement of liver functions may be seen in a flare of HBV in immune clearance phase or as a reactivation of HBV in patients with inactive or resolved HBV infection. While reactivation of HBV is usually seen in HBsAg positive patients, it is being increasingly recognized in patients with apparently resolved HBV infection who do not have HBsAg in serum but have IgG antibody to core antigen (anti-HBc) in the serum, especially so in patients on chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In an icteric patient who is HBsAg positive, it may be difficult to differentiate CHB-AE from acute viral hepatitis B (AVH-B). Both may have similar clinical presentation and even IgM anti-HBc, the traditional diagnostic marker of AVH-B, may also appear at the time of exacerbation of CHB. The differentiation between CHB-AE and AVH-B is important not only for prognostication but also because management strategies are different. Most cases of AVH-B will resolve on their own, HBsAg clearance is achieved spontaneously in 90-95% of adults and treatment is rarely indicated except in the few with severe/fulminant disease. In contrast, in CHB-AE, the onset of jaundice may lead to decompensation of liver disease and treatment is warranted. The mechanisms of acute exacerbation and the differentiating features between AVH-B and CHB-AE are reviewed.

Prophylactic Lamivudine to Improve the Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients With HBsAg Positive During Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis

CONTEXT

Raising the chemotherapy-induced HBV reactivation is parallel to the increment of chemotherapy treatments in breast cancer patients. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic use of lamivudine in breast cancer patients with HBsAg positive during chemotherapy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE, Pubmed, Ovid and Embase were used to search for clinical studies comparing with or without prophylactic use of lamivudine for HBV reactivation in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Outcomes of interest were the rate of HBV reactivation, incidence of hepatitis and incidence of hepatitis attributable to HBV reactivation, severity of hepatitis and severity of hepatitis attributable to HBV reactivation, the rate of chemotherapy disruption, and the rate of chemotherapy disruption attributable to HBV reactivation, overall mortality, and mortality attributable to HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

Four studies with 285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The rate of HBV reactivation, incidence of hepatitis and incidence of hepatitis related to HBV reactivation were reduced by use of prophylactic lamivudine compared to control group. Pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) were 0.09 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.03-0.26; P < 0.0001), 0.23 (95% CI 0.06-0.92; P = 0.04), and 0.10 (95% CI 0.03-0.32; P < 0.0001) respectively. There was a reduction in chemotherapy disruption related to HBV reactivation by use of prophylactic lamivudine (pooled OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.58; P = 0.01). Chemotherapy disruption, overall mortality, and mortality attributable to HBV reactivation were not significantly different between two groups. Pooled ORs were 0.42 (95% CI 0.11-1.58; P = 0.20), 0.37 (95% CI 0.07-2.04; P = 0.25), and 0.25 (95% CI 0.01-6.82; P = 0.41) respectively. Lamivudine was well-tolerated, and no additional toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of prophylactic lamivudine may have positive effect on the outcome of breast cancer patients with HBsAg positive during chemotherapy.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation associated with anti-neoplastic therapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a known complication during and after anti-cancer therapy. This condition can affect two patient populations: it is most commonly seen in patients who are seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but it is also being increasingly reported among patients who are HBsAg-negative but who have prior infection, as evident by seropositive status for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), irrespective of their anti-HBs (antibody to HBsAg) status. The clinical course can vary from asymptomatic hepatitis to fulminant hepatic failure that can be potentially fatal. With the increasing use of biological agents in addition to potent cytotoxic chemotherapy in the armamentarium of anti-cancer treatments, reactivation of hepatitis B has become a common clinical situation that is faced by both oncologists and hepatologists especially in HBV endemic areas. In this review, we discuss the clinical course of reactivation in the two HBV-infected sub-populations, and the role of anti-virals in the prevention and management of HBV reactivation in association with cytotoxic chemotherapy and biological therapies.

The efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis against hepatitis B reactivation in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Lamivudine has been recommended as prophylaxis for the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, information on breast cancer patients in particular has been lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis compared to untreated patients with hepatitis B S-antigen (HBsAg) seropositive breast cancer who had undergone chemotherapy.

METHODS

Studies that compared the efficacy of treatment with lamivudine prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis in HBsAg seropositive breast cancer patients were identified through Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 499 patients were analyzed. The rates of HBV reactivation in patients with lamivudine prophylaxis were significantly lower than those with no prophylaxis (risk ratio [RR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.39, p < 0.00001). Patients given lamivudine prophylaxis had significant reductions in the rates of hepatitis attributable to HBV compared with those not given treatment (RR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08-0.47, p = 0.002). The rates of moderate and severe hepatitis in patients with lamivudine prophylaxis were significantly lower compared with those patients who had not received prophylaxis (RR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.62, p < 0.003; RR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.59, p = 0.002). Patients given lamivudine prophylaxis had significantly fewer disruptions of chemotherapy (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21-0.64, p = 0.0004). There was no significant heterogeneity in the comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBsAg seropositive breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy is effective in reducing HBV reactivation and HBV-associated morbidity and mortality.

Management of hepatitis B reactivation in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is well documented in previously resolved or inactive HBV carriers who receive cancer chemotherapy. The consequences of HBV reactivation range from self-limited conditions to fulminant hepatic failure and death. HBV reactivation also leads to premature termination of chemotherapy or delay in treatment schedules. This review summarizes current knowledge of management of HBV reactivation in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) testing should be performed in patients who require cancer chemotherapy. Four meta-analyses support lamivudine prophylaxis for HBV reactivation during chemotherapy in HBsAg-positive patients. Randomized controlled trials to compare different HBV antiviral agents are needed to define optimal regimens for the prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

Psoriasis, hepatitis B, and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitory agents: a review and recommendations for management

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitory agents are currently considered to be contraindicated in psoriatic patients with hepatitis B.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to provide guidance to dermatologists on the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy in these patients.

METHODS

The current literature was reviewed regarding the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitory agents (etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab) in psoriatic patients with particular reference to hepatitis B infection.

RESULTS

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy may result in reactivated hepatitis B in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients with psoriasis. This also occurs, although less frequently in patients with an isolated positive hepatitis B core antibody. Thus, all psoriasis patients should be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen plus hepatitis B core antibody prior to the initiation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy. Infliximab has been associated with more reactivation cases than the other 2 agents and fatalities have been reported with this agent. Evidence is presented that the risk of reactivation can be greatly minimized or eliminated by early or pre-emptive antiviral therapy.

LIMITATIONS

The data is largely based on small case series that are retrospective in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis B screening is essential prior to the initiation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy. Psoriatic patients found to be hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B core antibody-positive should be referred to an appropriate specialist for evaluation and therapy. This would allow for the safe use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in psoriatic patients despite recently published guidelines to the contrary.

A single-center, prospective and randomized controlled study: Can the prophylactic use of lamivudine prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B s-antigen seropositive breast cancer patients during chemotherapy?

Over the past four decades, chemotherapy has played an important role in prolonging survival in breast cancer patients. However, it may also result in undesirable side effects such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation seen in this study. With the increasing use of chemotherapy paralleling the rise in breast cancer incidence, the occurrence of HBV reactivation is likely to further increase. Several strategies use lamivudine to deal with this problem. Initially, lamivudine had been used to treat patients who developed alanine transaminase elevation attributable to HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. However, using this strategy, fatal reactivation has also been reported. Later studies have suggested that prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduces HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity. However, these studies were based mainly on patients with lymphoma, whereas studies on breast cancer patients were few. Moreover, these studies were retrospective. Recently, a prospective study has recommended that deferred preemptive lamivudine could be a comparable alternative to the prophylactic strategy. However, it was not a randomized controlled study. In this study, it was examined the efficacy of the prophylactic strategy in hepatitis B s-antigen seropositive breast cancer patients during chemotherapy using a prospective, randomized controlled study. Two groups were studied. One group consisted of 21 patients who were treated with prophylactic lamivudine, the other group consisted of 21 patients who were not treated with prophylactic lamivudine. The results showed that the prophylactic lamivudine strategy significantly decreased the incidence of HBV reactivation (0 vs. 28.6%, P = 0.021). It was conclude that the prophylactic lamivudine strategy significantly reduces the incidence of HBV reactivation for hepatitis B s-antigen seropositive breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Preventing chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B reactivation in breast cancer patients: a prospective comparison of prophylactic versus deferred preemptive lamivudine

PURPOSE

Prophylactic lamivudine to prevent chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been widely adopted in hematological cancer patients. We examined the deferred preemptive strategy, upon rising viremia, in breast cancer (BC) patients based on sensitive serum HBV DNA level monitoring in a non-randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Baseline virological profiles before cytotoxic chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed in historical BC and non-BC patients. A prospective cohort study, including 22 early BC patients (Group I) who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)± and required adjuvant chemotherapy, were enrolled and had deferred preemptive use of lamivudine upon viremic surge. During the study period, another 23 BC patients, who did not participate in the above-mentioned study, received prophylactic use of lamivudine as routine practice (Group 2). Chemotherapy-induced hepatitis events and the lamivudine treatment course were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of hepatitis during chemotherapy between these two groups. Patients in Group I had statistically significant shorter duration of lamivudine use during chemotherapy. However, once lamivudine had been initiated, the treatment course is not significantly shorter than those patients given prophylactically.

CONCLUSIONS

Deferred preemptive strategy is feasible to control HBV replication and prevent its reactivation in BC patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, it may not be superior to prophylactic strategy and clinically practical.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection with persistently negative HBsAg on three HBsAg assays in a lymphoma patient undergoing chemotherapy

In patients with occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, acute exacerbation may occur when they become immunocompromised. Usually, these patients develop hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroreversion during the flare. Here we report on a patient with occult HBV infection, who developed HBV exacerbation after chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The resurgence of HBV DNA preceded the elevation of liver enzymes for 20 weeks. Atypically, despite high viraemia, serological tests showed persistently negative HBsAg using three different sensitive HBsAg assays (i.e., Architect, Murex and AxSYM). On comparing the amino acid sequence of the index patient with the consensus sequence, five mutations were found at pre-S1, five at pre-S2 and twenty-three mutations at the S region. Six amino acid mutations were located in the 'a' determinant, including P120T, K122R, M133T, F134L, D144A and G145A. The mutants K122R, F134L and G145A in our patient have not been tested for their sensitivity to Architect and Murex assays by the previous investigators and might represent the escape mutants to these assays.

Therapeutic vaccination and novel strategies to treat chronic HBV infection

Therapeutic vaccination for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B has so far shown limited clinical efficacy. In this review, we argue that the principal cause of this failure is the profound defect of virus-specific T cells present in chronic hepatitis B patients and we discuss potential new ways to achieve an efficient restoration of virus-specific immunity in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B: a unique presentation of a common disease

Severe acute exacerbation is a unique presentation of chronic hepatitis B characterized by very high alanine aminotransferase level accompanied by jaundice and hepatic decompensation. The underlying pathogenesis is likely related to excessive immune clearance, which may be related to the genotype of hepatitis B virus. The mortality is very high once hepatic encephalopathy develops, but some patients can recover to almost normal liver function in contrast to patients with end-stage liver cirrhosis. This condition should be differentiated from acute hepatitis B and other causes of acute hepatitis must be excluded. Conventional prognostic systems may not be applicable to severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B. In general, patients who have thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy have a higher risk of mortality regardless of the serum alanine aminotransferase levels. There is no evidence that lamivudine treatment can reduce the short-term mortality of severe acute exacerbation. However, patients with severe acute exacerbation tend to have a higher rate of maintained virological response, higher rate of hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and low rate of drug resistance on extended lamivudine treatment as compared to other chronic hepatitis B patients. Virological relapse and severe hepatitis reactivation is common after treatment cessation and therefore long-term antiviral treatment is recommended. Liver transplantation, particularly living donor liver transplantation, should be considered for patients who develop hepatic failure secondary to severe acute exacerbation.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with autoimmune liver diseases

BACKGROUND

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is characterized by undetectable serum HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) but detectable HBV-DNA in serum or liver.

AIMS

To determine the prevalence and clinical impact of occult HBV in autoimmune liver diseases as similar data are missing.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-six sera samples from HBsAg-negative patients, including 66 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), 93 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 37 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), were investigated for HBV-DNA using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before treatment initiation. One hundred and three serial samples from 38 AIH patients under immunosuppression and 282 selected blood donors (HBsAg negative; antibodies to HBV-core antigen positive) were also investigated. Fourteen available paraffin-embedded AIH liver samples were also investigated for HBV-DNA by nested-PCR.

RESULTS

Hepatitis B virus DNA was detected in the serum of 24/196 patients (12.2%) and 0/282 donors (P=0.0000). Nine patients had AIH (13.6%), eight had PBC (8.6%) and seven had PSC (18.9%) (P=0.0000 vs healthy). HBV-DNA detection in AIH livers was higher than in serum. HBV-DNA was associated neither with HBV markers nor with epidemiological, laboratory and clinical data. Serial testing of AIH patients revealed two HBV-DNA-negative patients before treatment becoming positive during treatment, while all HBV-DNA-positive patients before immunosuppression became negative.

CONCLUSION

Based mainly on serum HBV-DNA, we found a significant proportion of autoimmune liver disease patients with occult HBV compared with donors. However, taking into account our results in a small number of liver tissues, it should be emphasized that occult HBV could be even higher when both serum and liver specimens are investigated. Occult HBV does not seem to affect the clinical and laboratory features of the diseases, while AIH patients with occult HBV under immunosuppression do not deteriorate during follow-up.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in lymphoma patients with prior resolved hepatitis B undergoing anticancer therapy with or without rituximab

PURPOSE

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a well-recognized complication in cancer patients with chronic HBV (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] positive) undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. In patients who have resolved HBV (HBsAg negative and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc] +/- antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs] positive), such incidence has been much less common until recent use of rituximab. In this study on HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive lymphoma patients, the objectives were to determine the HBV reactivation rate in patients treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy and to compare it with the rate in patients treated without rituximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2006, all patients diagnosed with CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) had HBsAg determined before anticancer therapy. They were treated with either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) alone or rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP). HBsAg-negative patients had anti-HBc determined; serum was stored for anti-HBs and HBV DNA. All patients were observed for HBV reactivation, which was defined as detectable HBV DNA with ALT elevation during and for 6 months after anticancer therapy.

RESULTS

Among 104 CD20(+) DLBCL patients, 80 were HBsAg negative. Of the latter, 46 patients (44.2%) were HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive; 25 of these patients were treated with CHOP, and none had HBV reactivation. In contrast, among the 21 patients treated with R-CHOP, five developed HBV reactivation, including one patient who died of hepatic failure (P = .0148). Exploratory analysis identified male sex, absence of anti-HBs, and use of rituximab to be predictive of HBV reactivation.

CONCLUSION

Among HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP, 25% developed HBV reactivation. Close monitoring until at least 6 months after anticancer therapy is required, with an alternative approach of prophylactic antiviral therapy to prevent this potentially fatal condition.

The effectiveness of lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B viral reactivation in rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma

In rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma, the role of lamivudine therapy has not been well established. Therefore, in this nonrandomized phase II clinical study, hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers with B-cell lymphoma who received rituximab-containing regimen were treated with oral administration of lamivudine. The incidence and severity of hepatitis along with other adverse clinical outcomes were analyzed. Between January 2003 and March 2006, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Four of the 29 patients (13.8%) developed hepatitis during chemotherapy, none of which was attributed to HBV reactivation. According to WHO acute toxicity assessment criteria, the severity of hepatitis was grade I in two patients (6.9%) and grade II in two patients (6.9%). In these four patients, only one (3.5%) had interval delay in chemotherapy. No patient had total abnormal bilirubin. No patient had died as the result of hepatitis during the treatment. Interestingly, one of the 29 patients developed HBV activation 5.1 months after the withdrawal of lamivudine. This patient recovered after reinstallation of lamivudine therapy and is still alive. Consequently, our study confirmed previous reports that prophylactic lamivudine therapy can prevent HBV reactivation in HBV carriers who were receiving rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma.

Hepatitis B reactivation during adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence, outcome and risk factors for HBV reactivation in HBsAg positive breast cancer patients while on anthracycline -based adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2,431 patients with early breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy from March 2001 to December 2005. Among these patients, 111 HBsAg positive women were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (33.3%) developed acute hepatitis, of which 23 (20.7%) were related to HBV reactivation. Univariate analysis showed that an age > or = 7 years (p 0 .034) and abnormal sonographic findings such as a fatty liver or cirrhotic changes (p= 0 .034) were associated with HBV reactivation. However, an HBeAg positive status and the use of corticosteroids were not. Multivariate analysis found that no clinical factors could predict HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. All 23 patients who developed HBV reactivation received lamivudine as a therapeutic measure at the time of HBV reactivation. Despite the use of lamivudine, disruption in the chemotherapy protocol occurred in 18 patients (78.3%) and 14 of these patients had premature termination of their chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV reactivation occurred in a significant proportion of HBsAg positive patients during adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Once hepatitis developed, most patients could not finish the chemotherapy as planned despite lamivudine treatment. Until the risk factors for reactivation are clearly identified, HbsAg-positive patients should begin prophylactic antiviral treatment before initiating chemotherapy.

Antiviral prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers are at considerable risk of reactivation of HBV infection when undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Complications of HBV reactivation, including asymptomatic elevation of HBV DNA levels, acute hepatitis, acute liver failure, and delays or dose reductions in chemotherapy, are avoidable with appropriate prophylactic oral antiviral therapy. This article reviews evidence for and presents a grade A recommendation supporting primary prophylaxis among HBV carriers with lamivudine. The dose and duration of prophylaxis, risk of lamivudine resistance, and future directions of prophylactic therapy for HBV reactivation during chemotherapy are discussed. Recommendations are suggested based on expert opinion for prophylaxis with the combination of lamivudine plus adefovir or with entecavir as alternative antiviral strategies that substantially reduce or avoid the risk of HBV antiviral drug resistance.

Hepatitis B prophylaxis in patients undergoing chemotherapy for lymphoma: a decision analysis model

Hepatitis B reactivation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy for lymphomas. These patients may experience direct liver-related complications or reduced cancer survival because of interruptions in chemotherapy. Our aim was to compare the costs and outcomes of 2 different chronic hepatitis B management strategies. In hepatitis B carriers undergoing chemotherapy, we pursued a decision analysis model to compare the costs and clinical outcomes of using lamivudine prophylaxis versus initiating lamivudine only when clinically overt hepatitis occurred. Our results indicate that the use of lamivudine prophylaxis is cost-effective. Even though the use of lamivudine prophylaxis was associated with an incremental cost of $1530 per patient ($18,707 versus $17,177), both the number and severity of hepatitis B reactivations were reduced. None of the patients in the prophylaxis group had liver-related deaths versus 20 who died in the no-prophylaxis group. Cancer deaths were also reduced from 47-39 with lamivudine prophylaxis, presumably because of the increased need for cessation or modification of chemotherapy in patients who had severe hepatitis B virus flares. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of using lamivudine prophylaxis was $33,514 per life year saved.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide pharmacoeconomic support for the use of lamivudine prophylaxis in patients undergoing chemotherapy for lymphoma treatment.

Lamivudine prophylaxis reduces the incidence and severity of hepatitis in hepatitis B virus carriers who receive chemotherapy for lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common disease in China. Severe hepatitis is a well recognized complication in HBV carriers with malignant disease who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. The objective of the current study was to assess the value of antiviral lamivudine for reducing the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers with lymphoma who receive chemotherapy.

METHODS

Two groups were compared in this nonrandomized study. The prophylactic lamivudine group was comprised of 40 patients who received oral lamivudine at a dose of 100 mg daily before and until at least 8 weeks after they discontinued chemotherapy. The historic control group was comprised of 116 patients who received chemotherapy without lamivudine. The incidence and severity of hepatitis and other adverse clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Significant prognostic factors for the development of hepatitis were determined based on data derived from the control group.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in most clinical baseline characteristics, including gender distribution, age, tumor types, primary treatment, hepatitis Be antigen status, and the use of anthracyclines or/and prednisone. In the prophylactic lamivudine group, there was significantly less incidence of hepatitis (17.5% vs. 51.7% in the control group; P = 0.000); less severe hepatitis (according to World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) (10% with Grade 1, 5% with Grade 2, and 2.5% with Grade 3 hepatitis vs. 3.4% with Grade 1, 12.1% with Grade 2, 12.9% with Grade 3, and 23.3% with Grade 4 hepatitis in the control group; P = 0.000); and less disruption of chemotherapy (10.0% vs. 37.1% in the control group; P = 0.001). The overall mortality as a result of hepatitis in the prophylactic lamivudine group was lower compared with that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.0% vs. 5.2%; P = 0.163). In the control group, the factor associated with a greater risk of developing hepatitis was the use of prednisone. In the prophylactic lamivudine group, 1 of 40 patients (2.5%) developed hepatitis that was attributable to HBV reactivation. Further examination demonstrated that this single patient had a variation of HBV with YMDD mutations after the use of lamivudine for 9.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study confirmed previous reports that lamivudine prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence and severity of hepatitis in HBV carriers who were receiving chemotherapy for lymphoma. The chemotherapy disruption rate as a result of severe hepatitis also was decreased significantly.

Inclusion of biological factors in parallel-architecture normal-tissue complication probability model for radiation-induced liver disease

PURPOSE

To include biologic factors in parallel-architecture normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for gastric or hepatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 151 patients (89 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 62 with gastric cancer) who received 3D-CRT to the liver were included (isocenter dose range 33.0 to 66.0 Gy; mean 48.0 Gy). RILD was defined as grade 3 or higher liver toxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute within 4 months after 3D-CRT. Possible correlations of patient-related or dosimetric factors with RILD were tested. Maximum-likelihood analysis estimated NTCP model parameters for group and subgroups. Goodness-of-fit analysis estimated deviance of NTCP model parameters between subgroups.

RESULTS

RILD developed in 25 patients. Hepatitis B virus carrier status (p < 0.001) was the only significant independent factor. The 4 parallel NTCP model parameters, mean functional reserve (V(50)), width of functional reserve distribution (sigma), dose damage to 50% of liver subunits (D(50)), and slope parameter for subunit dose-response (k), were respectively, 0.54, 0.14, 50 Gy, 0.18 (group); 0.53, 0.07, 50 Gy, 4.6 x 10(-7) (carriers); 0.59, 0.12, 25 Gy, 59.8 (noncarriers). In carrier-state subgroups, goodness-of-fit deviance with 1 subgroup's parameter set would have been worse in the other group. Across subgroups, patients with RILD all had liver fraction damage (f) greater than 0.4 compared with wider distribution for the whole group.

CONCLUSIONS

RILD is described with a parallel-architecture NTCP model for HBV carriers and noncarriers with a threshold effect greater than 0.4. The main difference is in slope parameter for subunit dose-response.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lamivudine

PURPOSE

Although the mainstay of treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) had been radiotherapy, chemotherapy has increasingly been adopted in conjunction with radiation and in advanced disease. In parts of Asia where NPC is prevalent, it is also known that around 10% of the population has chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Cancer patients who are HBV carriers are frequently complicated by HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. This may result in liver damage, which disrupts anticancer therapy and compromises the patients' prognosis. In its most severe form, fatal hepatic failure may occur. With the increasing use of chemotherapy in NPC, the occurrence of HBV reactivation is likely to increase further. Although recent reports have suggested that the antiviral agent lamivudine may reduce HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity, there has been no data on this aspect in NPC patients. This study assessed the role of lamivudine in preventing HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity in NPC patients who have chronic HBV infection and are undergoing chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups were studied. One group consisted of 16 patients who received prophylactic lamivudine prior to and until 8 weeks after discontinuing chemotherapy. The other comprised 21 historical control subjects who underwent chemotherapy without prophylactic lamivudine. The outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

With prophylactic lamivudine, there were significantly fewer incidences of hepatitis (6.7% vs 33.3%, P = 0.047) and HBV reactivation (0% vs 28.6%, P = 0.027), and less disruption of chemotherapy (18.8% vs 67.7%, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduces the incidence and morbidity of HBV reactivation in NPC patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Use of lamivudine to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

In parts of Asia, about 10% of the population have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and cancer patients who are HBV carriers are frequently complicated by HBV reactivation while receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The condition may result in varying degrees of liver damage, causing disruption in chemotherapy and compromising the patients' prognosis. With the increasing use of chemotherapy paralleling the rise in breast cancer incidence, the occurrence of HBV reactivation is likely to further increase. Recent reports have suggested that the anti-viral agent, lamivudine, may reduce HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity. However, most studies are based on small series of lymphoma patients, while information on the other high risk population, namely breast cancer patients, has been lacking. In this study, we studied the role of lamivudine in preventing HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity in breast cancer patients with chronic HBV infection who were planned for chemotherapy. Two groups were studied. One group consisted of 31 patients who received 'prophylactic lamivudine' prior to and until 8 weeks after discontinuing chemotherapy. The other comprised of 61 historical controls who underwent chemotherapy without prophylactic lamivudine. The outcomes, in terms of the efficacy of lamivudine in reducing the incidence of HBV reactivation, and diminishing morbidity during chemotherapy were compared. The results revealed that in the prophylactic lamivudine group, despite a significantly higher proportion receiving anthracyclines, there was significantly fewer incidences of hepatitis (12.9 vs. 59.0%, p < 0.001), less HBV reactivation (6.5. vs. 31.1%, p=0.008), and less disruption of chemotherapy (16.1% vs. 45.9%, p=0.006). We conclude that prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduces the incidence of HBV reactivation and the overall morbidity of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Unexpectedly frequent hepatitis B reactivation by chemoradiation in postgastrectomy patients

BACKGROUND

Postgastrectomy patients undergoing chemoradiation risk chemoradiation-induced liver disease (CRILD). The objectives of this study were to investigate dosimetric implications and assess biologic susceptibility to CRILD in these patients.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with Stage IB-IV gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma without metastases underwent radical total/subtotal gastrectomy; regional lymph node dissection; and postoperative, adjuvant, concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Among these, 8 patients developed CRILD (defined as Grade 3-4 liver toxicity), and 11 patients were chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (HBV+). Chemotherapy consisted of 1 cycle of etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (ELF); followed by 5 weekly high doses of 5-fluorouracil (2000-2600 mg/m2) and leucovorin concurrent with radiotherapy (median dose, 45 grays [Gy] to the tumor bed/regional lymphatics); followed by 3 cycles of ELF separated by a 21-day interval. Patients were followed for > or = 4 months after CCRT. Patient-related and dosimetric factors were correlated with CRILD.

RESULTS

HBV+ status was the only independent factor associated with CRILD. HBV+ patients had a higher CRILD incidence (6 of 11 patients vs. 2 of 51 patients; P < 0.001). HBV-negative patients with CRILD were recipients of a higher mean liver dose (MLD) (23.8 Gy vs. 15.2 Gy; P = 0.009) and a higher volume fraction of liver that received > 30 Gy (36.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.009) compared with noncarriers without CRILD, but no MLD difference was found between HBV+ patients with or without CRILD. Moreover, in four of six carriers with CRILD, HBV infection was reactivated during CRILD. Two of the toxicities were fatal.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV carriers had a higher incidence of CRILD after postgastrectomy CCRT, probably related to HBV reactivation. Dosimetric parameters modulated the risk of CRILD in noncarriers, but not in carriers. These factors deserve attention in CRILD/HBV+ patients, and the underlying pathogenesis warrants investigation.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients who are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers and undergoing chemotherapy (CT) may be complicated by HBV reactivation. Over 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are HBV carriers; however, the incidence of HBV reactivation during CT has not been well-reported. A prospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of HBV reactivation, the associated morbidity and mortality, and possible risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

102 HBsAg-positive patients with inoperable HCC underwent systemic CT. Patients received either combination cisplatin, interferon, doxorubicin and fluorouracil (PIAF) or single-agent doxorubicin. They were followed up during and for 8 weeks after CT.

RESULTS

In 102 patients, 59 (58%) developed hepatitis amongst whom 37 (36%) were attributable to HBV reactivation. Twelve (30%) died of HBV reactivation. CT was interrupted in 32 patients (86%) with reactivation and 54 (83%) without reactivation (P>0.05). The median survivals were 6.00 and 5.62 months, respectively (P=0.694). Elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was found to be a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

HBV reactivation is a common cause of liver damage during CT in HBsAg-positive HCC patients. The only identifiable associated risk factor was elevated pre-treatment ALT. Further studies into the role of antiviral and novel anticancer therapies are required to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors associating with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy

For cancer patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy, HBV reactivation is a well-described complication, which may result in varying degrees of liver damage. Several clinical features and the pre-chemotherapy HBV viral load have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of developing the condition: (1). to assess the clinical and virological factors in a comprehensive manner and thereby identify those that are associated with the development of HBV reactivation; (2). to develop a predictive model to quantify the risk of HBV reactivation. In all, 138 consecutive cancer patients who were HBV carriers and undergoing chemotherapy were studied, of which 128 patients had sera available for real-time PCR HBV DNA measurement. They were followed up throughout their course of chemotherapy and the HBV reactivation rate was determined. The clinical and virological features between those who did and did not develop viral reactivation were compared. These included age, sex, baseline liver function tests, HBeAg status and viral load (HBV DNA) prior to the chemotherapy, and the use of specific cytotoxic agents. In all, 36 (26%) developed HBV reactivation. Multivariate analysis revealed pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA level, the use of steroids and a diagnosis of lymphoma or breast cancer to be significant factors. Based on real-time HBV DNA PCR assay, detectable baseline HBV DNA prior to the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy, the use of steroids and a diagnosis of lymphoma or breast cancer are predictive factors for the development of HBV reactivation. A predictive model was developed from the current data, based on a logistic regression method.

Lamivudine for the prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B s-antigen seropositive cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy

PURPOSE

For cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well described complication resulting in varying degrees of liver damage. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of the antiviral agent lamivudine in reducing the incidence of HBV reactivation and diminishing morbidity and mortality of cancer patients with chronic HBV infection during chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two groups were compared in this nonrandomized study. The prophylactic lamivudine group consisted of 65 patients in a phase II study who were treated with lamivudine before and until 8 weeks after discontinuing chemotherapy. The historical controls consisted of 193 consecutive patients who underwent chemotherapy without prophylactic lamivudine. Significant prognosticators for the development of HBV reactivation were determined based on data from the controls. Potential confounding factors were identified between the two groups. The outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In the controls, lymphoma and anthracycline usage were factors identified to be associated with reactivation. The two groups were comparable in most baseline characteristics, although in the prophylactic lamivudine group, there were significantly more patients with lymphoma and receiving anthracyclines. In the prophylactic lamivudine group, there was significantly less HBV reactivation (4.6% v 24.4% in the controls; P <.001), fewer incidences of hepatitis (17.5% v 44.6%; P <.0001) that were less severe (4.8% v 18.7%; P =.0005), and less disruption of chemotherapy (15.4% v 34.6%; P =.0029). The reduction in overall mortality was not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduced the incidence of HBV reactivation and the overall morbidity of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Lamivudine therapy in acute leukemia patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B in patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia may give rise to a variety of clinical patterns including hepatitis, asymtomatic hepatic dysfunction, massive hepatic necrosis and fatal hepatic failure. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue which can directly suppress Hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. We reviewed our combined experience to evaluate the role of lamivudine as prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients who were HBsAg carriers treated with chemotherapy between July 2000 and October 2002 at the Numune Education and Research Hospitals (Ankara, Turkey) retrospectively.

METHODS

We investigated 75 acute leukemia patients who received chemotherapy. Thirteen (17.3%) of 75 acute leukemia patients were HbsAg positive and of 7 (53.3%) were HBV DNA positive. Two patients (patients 5 and 6) had a chemotherapy regimen that included corticosteroids and were HBsAg and HBV DNA negative but anti HBc total positive. HBsAg positive patients with or without HBV DNA positivity were treated with a dose of 100 mg/day lamivudine commencing when chemotherapy was initiated. Lamivudine started at the beginning of chemotherapy and was maintained for 6 months following the cessation of chemotherapy. During lamivudine treatment, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Gama glutamile transpeptidase (GGT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were followed.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients who presented with hepatic dysfunction during the first chemotherapy cycle, 4 improved during the second course. After completing chemotherapy, the levels of hepatic enzymes were in the normal range in all but one patient. With lamivudune prophylaxis, HBV DNA positivity did not develop in any of the HBV DNA negative patients. The two patients who received corticosteroids with their first chemotherapy cycle became positive for HBsAg and HBV DNA and were given Lamivudine when the seroconversion was established. Median follow up from the diagnosis of leukemia was 14.5 months. Survival rate at the end of follow up was 5 (38%) for the 13 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

As this infection is endemic in our country and the exposure to blood products is high in these patients, HBV infection is more common. Prophylaxis with daily administration of lamivudine to HBsAg carriers who are candidates for chemotherapy seems to be effective and may prevent chemotherapy induced HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.

Successful clearance of hepatitis B virus after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: beneficial combination of adoptive immunity transfer and lamivudine

We report a 38-yr-old male with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), whose serological tests for the hepatitis B virus (HBV) before transplantation showed a chronic carrier status, and a liver biopsy specimen revealed chronic liver injury because of HBV. The patient underwent allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from his sibling who was hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) positive. He had received lamivudine treatment for the prophylaxis of HBV reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy, and lamivudine administration continued after transplantation. Successful engraftment was documented 3 wk after PBSCT, and clearance of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was observed 2 months after PBSCT. Liver function tests transiently showed a mild elevation of aminotransferases on day 25, although this returned to normal after the dose escalation of the immunosuppressive agent. We presume that the combination of adoptive immunity transfer by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HBsAb-positive donor and antiviral drugs such as lamivudine is beneficial in clearing HBV in chronic carriers.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in breast cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective study

Breast cancer is a rapidly increasing problem in many developing countries, and cytotoxic chemotherapy is now an integral part of its management. In several developing countries, the carriage of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in cancer patients may be as high as 12%, and such patients are at risk of developing fatal HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. HBV reactivation is well recognized in patients with hematological malignancies, but limited data are available on patients with other, more common, cancers, such as breast cancer. Recent data have suggested that increased viral replication, an indication of HBV reactivation, may precede clinical hepatitis. In the absence of serial HBV DNA monitoring, HBV reactivation during chemotherapy may have been underestimated. In this prospective study, breast cancer patients who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositive were followed up during chemotherapy. The main objectives were to determine the incidence of HBV reactivation in breast cancer patients undergoing conventional chemotherapy; to investigate whether "serial HBV DNA monitoring" improves the accuracy of diagnosing HBV reactivation when compared with previous schema that only measured HBV DNA at the time of clinical hepatitis ("conventional monitoring"); and to assess the clinical consequences as a result of developing the condition. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors associated with this condition. Over an 18-month period, 41 patients were studied. Ten developed HBV reactivation by conventional monitoring criteria, but with serial HBV DNA monitoring, seven additional patients were diagnosed when increased HBV DNA levels were detected before, but not concomitant with, clinical hepatitis. Thus, a total of 17 patients (41%) developed HBV reactivation. Premature termination of chemotherapy or delay in treatment schedules occurred in 71% of the patients who developed viral reactivation, as compared with 33% in those who did not develop the condition (P = 0.019). No risk factors associated with the development of HBV reactivation could be identified. Serial monitoring of HBV DNA, in addition to liver function, increases the sensitivity of diagnosing of HBV reactivation, and helps explain some cases that would otherwise be labeled as "cryptogenic hepatitis," for which concomitant HBV DNA measured at the time of hepatitis was undetectable. The present study highlights the importance of monitoring HBsAg-seropositive patients who are receiving chemotherapy for common solid tumors such as breast cancer.

Prophylaxis with lamivudine of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic HbsAg carriers with hemato-oncological neoplasias treated with chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is well documented complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy in asymptomatic HBV carriers. Its clinical manifestation include fulminant hepatitis which may result in fatal liver failure. With the more widespread use of chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the problem of delivering potentially harmful treatment to HBV carriers is becoming increasingly frequent. Until recently the management of HBV reactivation has been mainly supportive. With the introduction of lamivudine, a highly effective nucleoside analogue against HBV with an excellent toxicity profile has become available. However, in light of the possibility that its prolonged use may foster the emergence of mutant lamivudine-resistant HBV strain, caution is required before recommending its widespread use. The present review briefly addresses the epidemiological, pathogenetic and clinical aspects of HBV reactivation as well the predisposing factors to its development. The results obtained with lamivudine both as treatment and as prophylaxis of hepatic flares are analysed in detail in order to provide a rational basis for clinical decisions before treating HBV carriers with chemotherapy.

N/A

N/A

Tuberculosis: a six-month cure

Today the treatment of tuberculosis can be based on a course of chemotherapy that lasts only 6 months, giving patients the best change of cure and affording the health personnel an exceptional opportunity to improve both their patients' compliance with the treatment and the overall efficiency of their own activities.