Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta-analysis

The Patient Is Dying of Drug Poisoning-Let's Increase the Dosage!

The recently completed Select Committee of the NSW Upper House into Birth Trauma has caused consternation amongst colleagues and triggered a controversial response from the NSW Government. It is high time that our college started to fight back.

Impact of the type of vaginal assisted delivery on the pelvic floor and OASI - Ultrasound study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma in women after assisted vaginal delivery.

METHODS

Retrospective study on 201 primiparous women after assisted vaginal delivery, control group 43 women after normal vaginal delivery. 4D translabial ultrasound examination of the levator ani and the anal sphincter was performed according to standard methodology at least 3 months postpartum. Ultrasound classification of trauma was performed by two independent evaluators blinded to clinical data. A third evaluator was asked to confirm findings in case of discrepancy.

RESULTS

The LAM avulsion rate for normal delivery was 20.9%, for forceps 60%, for vacuum extraction 21.7% Odds ratio for forceps vs. NVD was 4.32 (1.69, 11.01), for vacuum vs. NVD 0.98 (0.409, 2.327). Ultrasound OASI rate was 33.3% for Forceps and 30.50% for Vacuum. This equated to an OR of 1.78 (0.85 - 3.10) for Forceps and 1.62 (0.85-3.10) for Vacuum relative to NVD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm forceps as the major risk factor for levator avulsion. Forceps also implies a non-significantly higher risk of OASI compared to NVD.

Obstetric risk factors for levator ani muscle avulsion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Women have a 11% lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse. Levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion is one etiological factor associated with primary and recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse has been shown to greatly affect the quality of life and well-being of women. Conduct a meta-analysis identifying risk factors associated with LAM avulsion recognised on transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in primiparous women after vaginal birth.

STUDY DESIGN

OVID Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2021 were searched. Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration) was used to analyse data. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. The heterogeneity among studies was calculated using the I2statistic.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 9333 women). Major LAM avulsion was diagnosed in an average of 22 % (range 12.7-39.5 %) of cases. Twenty-two studies used TPUS and three used MRI to diagnose avulsion. Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors were identified. Significant predictors identified were forceps (OR 6.25 [4.33 - 9.0]), obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OR 3.93 [2.85-5.42]), vacuum (OR 2.41 [1.40-4.16]), and maternal age (OR 1.06 [1.02-1.10]).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first meta-analysis of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with LAM avulsion. This information could be used to develop a clinically applicable risk prediction model to target postnatal women at risk of LAM avulsion with a view to prevent the onset of pelvic floor organ prolapse.

Assisted vaginal birth in 21st century: current practice and new innovations

Assisted vaginal birth rates are falling globally with rising cesarean delivery rates. Cesarean delivery is not without consequence, particularly when carried out in the second stage of labor. Cesarean delivery in the second stage is not entirely protective against pelvic floor morbidity and can lead to serious complications in a subsequent pregnancy. It should be acknowledged that the likelihood of morbidity for mother and baby associated with cesarean delivery increases with advancing labor and is greater than spontaneous vaginal birth, irrespective of the method of operative birth in the second stage of labor. In this article, we argue that assisted vaginal birth is a skilled and safe option that should always be considered and be available as an option for women who need assistance in the second stage of labor. Selecting the most appropriate mode of birth at full dilatation requires accurate clinical assessment, supported decision-making, and personalized care with consideration for the woman's preferences. Achieving vaginal birth with the primary instrument is more likely with forceps than with vacuum extraction (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.88). Midcavity forceps are associated with a greater incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.55) but no difference in neonatal Apgar score or umbilical artery pH. The risk for adverse outcomes is minimized when the procedure is conducted by a skilled accoucheur who selects the most appropriate instrument likely to achieve vaginal birth with the primary instrument. Anticipation of potential complications and dynamic decision-making are just as important as the technique for safe instrument use. Good communication with the woman and the birthing partner is vital and there are various recommendations on how to achieve this. There have been recent developments (such as OdonAssist) in device innovation, training, and strategies for implementation at a scale that can provide opportunities for both improved outcomes and reinvigoration of an essential skill that can save mothers' and babies' lives across the world.

Evaluation of levator ani muscle elasticity after vaginal delivery and cesarean section using shear wave elastography

PURPOSE

The risk of pelvic floor muscle injury is commonly considered to be higher in vaginal than in cesarean delivery. This study aimed to compare levator ani muscle (LAM) elasticity after vaginal and cesarean delivery using shear wave elastography (SWE).

METHODS

Postpartum women who underwent a single SWE evaluation 1 month after their first delivery were divided into vaginal and cesarean delivery groups. The elastic moduli of both sides of the LAM were measured in a horizontal section and compared between the groups. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed to compare LAM elasticity according to the delivery method within the vaginal delivery group-normal vaginal delivery, episiotomy, and operative vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

Sixty-two women were included (vaginal delivery, n = 47; elective cesarean section, n = 15). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the LAM elastic modulus was significantly lower in the vaginal delivery group than in the cesarean delivery group (right LAM: 44.2 vs. 72.7 kPa, p = 0.0036; left LAM 40.4 vs. 82.7 kPa, p < 0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, the right LAM elastic modulus was significantly lower in the operative vaginal delivery subgroup than in the normal vaginal delivery subgroup (p = 0.0131). However, there was no significant difference in the left LAM elastic modulus between the three subgroups.

CONCLUSION

LAM elasticity was significantly lower after vaginal delivery than after cesarean delivery. Furthermore, the elasticity of the right LAM was lower after operative vaginal delivery than after normal vaginal delivery. SWE has the potential to provide an objective quantitative assessment of postpartum pelvic floor muscle recovery.

Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study

INTRODUCTION

It is essential to assess the levator ani properly as part of clinical care in patients presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a previously published method to assess levator ani defects with three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound. The primary aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the levator ani deficiency score in a cohort of non-instrumentally delivered primiparas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Primiparas (n = 141) were examined at least 1 year after vaginal birth. Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasound volumes were acquired by a single examiner using two different automated ultrasound probes. The volumes were analyzed by two separate raters who were blinded to each other's assessments. Descriptive statistics were calculated for levator ani deficiency score and categorized into three levels (mild, moderate, severe). Kendall's tau-b was calculated for intra- and interrater comparisons.

RESULTS

Intrarater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were high (Kendall's tau-b ≥0.80 for Rater 1; >0.79 for Rater 2). Interrater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were also high (Kendall's tau-b >0.9 for assessment 1 and >0.78 for assessment 2). Varying by rater, probe and assessment, 75.9%-80.1% of the study population had no/mild deficiency, 6.4%-9.2% had moderate deficiency, and 4.3%-6.4% had severe levator ani deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a feasible method to assess defects of the levator ani muscle and can be reproduced with high intra- and interrater correlations. Using the scoring system in clinical practice may facilitate concordant assessment between different examiners. However, the system should be used to support clinical findings and symptomatology and not as a screening tool, as the score is lacking the category of no levator ani deficiency.

Ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor during active labor: A longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence about changes in the pelvic floor during active labor. We aimed to investigate changes in hiatal dimensions during the active first stage of labor and associations with fetal descent and head position.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study at the National University Hospital of Iceland, from 2016 to 2018. Nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor, a single fetus in cephalic presentation, and gestational age ≥37 weeks were eligible. Fetal position was assessed with transabdominal ultrasound and fetal descent was measured with transperineal ultrasound. Three-dimensional volumes were acquired from transperineal scanning at the start of the active phase of labor and in late first stage or early second stage. The largest transverse hiatal diameter was measured in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. The levator urethral gap was measured as the distance between the center of the urethra and the levator insertion using tomographic ultrasound imaging. Measurements of the levator urethral gap were made in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and 2.5 and 5 mm cranial to this.

RESULTS

The final study population comprised 78 women. The mean transverse hiatal diameter increased 12.4% between the two examinations, from 39.4 ± 4.1 mm (±standard deviation) at the first examination to 44.3 ± 5.8 mm at the last examination (p < 0.01). We found a moderate correlation between the transverse hiatal diameter and fetal station at the last examination (r = 0.44, r2  = 0.19; p < 0.01; regression equation y = 2.71 + 0.014x), and a weak correlation between the change in transverse hiatal diameter and change in fetal station (r = 0.29; r2  = 0.08; p = 0.01; regression equation y = 0.24 + 0.012x). Levator urethral gap increased significantly in all three planes on both the left and right sides. Head position was not associated with hiatal measurements after adjusting for fetal station.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant, but only modest, increase of the hiatal dimensions during the first stage of labor. The risk of levator ani trauma will therefore be low during this stage. The change in transverse hiatal diameter was associated with fetal descent but not with head position.

Diagnosis of maternal birth trauma by pelvic floor ultrasound

BRIEF SUMMARY

Maternal somatic birth trauma due to vaginal delivery is more common than generally assumed and an important cause of future morbidity. Maternal birth trauma may involve both psychological and somatic morbidity, some of it long-term and permanent. Somatic birth trauma is now understood to encompass not just episiotomy, perineal tears and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), but also trauma to the levator ani muscle, termed 'avulsion'. This review will focus on recent developments in the imaging diagnosis of maternal birth trauma, discuss the most important risk factors and strategies for primary and secondary prevention. Translabial and exo-anal ultrasound allow the assessment of maternal birth trauma in routine clinical practice and enable the use of levator avulsion and anal sphincter trauma as key performance indicators of maternity services. This is likely to lead to a greater awareness of maternal birth trauma amongst maternity caregivers and improved outcomes for patients, not the least due to an increasing emphasis on patient autonomy and informed consent in antenatal and intrapartum care.

An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders

AIMS

The terminology of obstetric pelvic floor disorders should be defined and reported as part of a wider clinically oriented consensus.

METHODS

This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Continence Society (ICS) and the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The process was supported by external referees. Appropriate clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give coding to definitions. An extensive process of 12 main rounds of internal and 2 rounds of external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by consensus.

RESULTS

A terminology report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders, encompassing 357 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it usable by different specialty groups and disciplines involved in the study and management of pregnancy, childbirth and female pelvic floor disorders. Clinical assessment, investigations, diagnosis, conservative and surgical treatments are major components. Illustrations have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts, in use in the literature and offering further research potential but requiring further validation, have been included as an Appendix. As with similar reports, interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to maintain relevance of the document and ensure it remains as widely applicable as possible.

CONCLUSION

A consensus-based Terminology Report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders has been produced to support clinical practice and research.

Birthweight difference between deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in parous women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

While obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is less frequent in parous compared to nulliparous women, it remains a major concern affecting quality of life of women worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between birthweight (BW) difference between deliveries and risk of OASI in parous women.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study including parous women with at least one previous vaginal delivery who were diagnosed with OASI. The control group consisted of parous women who did not have OASI during vaginal delivery. Controls were matched in a 1:2 ratio by year of birth, maternal age, and parity. Medical history, obstetric background, and current labor-related data were compared. Further univariate and multivariable analyses were performed, assessing for risk factors for OASI.

RESULTS

One hundred eight parous women who had a diagnosis of OASI and a control group of 216 parturients who delivered without OASI were included in the final analysis. Differences between the current BW and the preceding and maximal previous BW were evaluated. There were significantly higher rates of women who had a larger neonate with > 500 g difference between the current and previous BW in the OASI group than in those with no OASI (28.7% vs. 12.30%, respectively; p < 0.001). Following a multivariable analysis for the dependent parameter of OASI, the following parameters were found to be independently associated with OASI outcome: previous operative vaginal delivery, BW ≥ 90th percentile, and current BW ≥ 500 g compared to previous maximal BW.

CONCLUSIONS

In parous women, neonatal BW increase between deliveries of > 500 g is associated with OASI.

Episiotomy in vacuum extraction, do we cut the levator ani muscle? A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Vaginal delivery may lead to levator ani muscle (LAM) injury or avulsion. Episiotomy may reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in operative vaginal delivery, but may increase the risk of LAM injury. Our aim was to assess whether lateral episiotomy in vacuum extraction (VE) in primiparous women causes LAM injury.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 58 primiparous women with episiotomy nested within an ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trial of lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy in VE (EVA trial) was carried out in Sweden. LAM injury was evaluated using 3D endovaginal ultrasound 6-12 months after delivery and Levator Ani Deficiency (LAD) score. Episiotomy scar properties were measured. Characteristics were described and compared using Chi-squared tests. We stipulated that if a lateral episiotomy cuts the LAM, ≥50% would have a LAM injury. Among those, ≥50% would be side specific. We compared the observed prevalence with a test of one proportion.

RESULTS

Twelve (20.7%, 95% CI 10.9-32.9) of 58 women had a LAD (p < 0.001, compared with the stipulated 50%). Six (50.0%, 95% CI 21.1% to 78.9%) of 12 women had a LAD on the episiotomy side, including those with bilateral LAD (p = 1.00). Two (16.7%, 95% CI 2.1% to 48.4%) of 12 women had a LAD exclusively on the episiotomy side (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no excessive risk of cutting the LAM while performing a lateral episiotomy. LAD was not seen in women with episiotomies shorter than 18 mm.

Is urethral pressure associated with parity and delivery mode?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Stress urinary incontinence is the most prevalent type of urinary incontinence and childbirth is a risk factor. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between delivery mode and urethral sphincter function as measured by the maximum urethral pressure (MUP).

METHODS

A retrospective study on women seen in a tertiary urogynaecological center for urodynamic testing between January 2017 to December 2019. Women were classified into the following groups: (1) nulliparous; (2) caesarean section only; (3) at least one spontaneous vaginal delivery but no instrumental deliveries; (4) at least one vacuum delivery but no forceps; (5) at least one forceps delivery.

RESULTS

The complete data sets of 1238 women were analysed; 1112 (90%) were vaginally parous. Mean age was 58 (18-95) years. Mean parity was 2.6 (0-9); 57 (4.6%) were nulliparous, 69 (5.6%) had only been delivered by caesarean section, 762 (61.6%) had at least one spontaneous vaginal delivery but no instrumental deliveries, 41 (3.3%) had at least one vacuum but no forceps delivery, and 309 (25%) had at least one forceps delivery. Mean MUP was 41.8 cmH₂O. There was a significant association between vaginal parity and MUP (P < 0.001). On ANOVA test, delivery mode was significantly associated with MUP. This became nonsignificant on regression analysis, with only age significantly associated with MUP (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of childbirth on urethral sphincter function seems to be largely due to the first vaginal birth. We failed to show an effect of instrumental delivery.

All or nothing? A second look at partial levator avulsion

OBJECTIVE

To define associations between partial levator trauma and symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 3484 women attending a tertiary urogynecology unit for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction between January 2012 and February 2020. All women underwent a standardized interview, clinical pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination and tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Women with full levator avulsion were excluded from analysis. Partial levator avulsion was quantified using the tomographic trauma score (TTS), in which slices 3-8 are scored bilaterally for abnormal insertions. Binomial multiple logistic regression was analyzed independently for the outcome variables prolapse symptoms, symptom bother and objective prolapse on clinical examination and imaging, with age and body mass index as covariates. Two continuous outcome variables, prolapse bother score and hiatal area on Valsalva, were analyzed using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Of the 3484 women, ultrasound data were missing or incomplete in 164 due to lack of equipment, clerical error and/or inadequate image quality. Full levator avulsion was diagnosed in 807 women, leaving 2513 for analysis. TTS ranged from 0-10, with a median of 0. Partial trauma (TTS > 0) was observed in 667/2513 (26.5%) women. All subjective and objective measures of POP were associated significantly with TTS, most strongly for cystocele. Associations were broadly linear and similar for all slice locations but disappeared after accounting for hiatal area on Valsalva.

CONCLUSION

Partial avulsion is associated with POP and prolapse symptoms. This association was strongest for cystocele, both on POP-Q and ultrasound imaging. The effect of partial avulsion on POP and prolapse symptoms is explained fully by its effect on hiatal area. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

A review of levator ani avulsion after childbirth: Incidence, imaging and management

Key Content • Levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion injury occurs occultly during childbirth, most commonly during operative vaginal deliveries. • Injuries of levator ani have long term sequelae for pelvic floor health. As life expectancy increases the burden of disease upon urogynaecology services will need to be considered. • Diagnosis of this condition can be difficult as there is no agreed 'gold standard' imaging modality. • There is no consensus regarding surgical management of LAM avulsion. Learning objectives • Review anatomy and function of levator ani muscle • Identify the risk factors for levator ani avulsion injury • Role of imaging to appropriately identify LAM injury and current management options including appropriate follow up • Management of subsequent pregnancy following LAM avulsion Ethical issues • Is there value to the patient in diagnosing levator ani avulsion when there is no recommended treatment for these injuries?

Faecal incontinence in adults

Faecal incontinence, which is defined by the unintentional loss of solid or liquid stool, has a worldwide prevalence of ≤7% in community-dwelling adults and can markedly impair quality of life. Nonetheless, many patients might not volunteer the symptom owing to embarrassment. Bowel disturbances, particularly diarrhoea, anal sphincter trauma (obstetrical injury or previous surgery), rectal urgency and burden of chronic illness are the main risk factors for faecal incontinence; others include neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic floor anatomical disturbances. Faecal incontinence is classified by its type (urge, passive or combined), aetiology (anorectal disturbance, bowel symptoms or both) and severity, which is derived from the frequency, volume, consistency and nature (urge or passive) of stool leakage. Guided by the clinical features, diagnostic tests and therapies are implemented stepwise. When simple measures (for example, bowel modifiers such as fibre supplements, laxatives and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecography, rectal compliance and sensation, and anal neurophysiological tests) are performed as necessary. Non-surgical options (diet and lifestyle modification, behavioural measures, including biofeedback therapy, pharmacotherapy for constipation or diarrhoea, and anal or vaginal barrier devices) are often effective, especially in patients with mild faecal incontinence. Thereafter, perianal bulking agents, sacral neuromodulation and other surgeries may be considered when necessary.

Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To update a previously published systematic review and perform a meta-analysis on the risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Embase were systematically searched. We searched from July 1, 2014 until July 5, 2021. The previous search was from inception until August 4, 2014.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials and cross-sectional and cohort studies conducted in the Western developed countries that reported on multivariable analysis of risk factors for primary prolapse or prolapse recurrence were included. The definition of prolapse was based on anatomic references, and prolapse recurrence was defined as anatomic recurrence after native tissue repair. Studies on prolapse recurrence with a median follow-up of ≥1 year after surgery were included.

METHODS

Quality assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data from the previous review and this review were combined into forest plots, and meta-analyses were performed where possible. If the data could not be pooled, "confirmed risk factors" were identified if ≥2 studies reported a significant association in multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

After screening, 14 additional studies were selected-8 on the risk factors for primary prolapse and 6 on prolapse recurrence. Combined with the results from the previous review, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the data of 47,429 women. Not all studies could be pooled because of heterogeneity. Meta-analyses showed that birthweight (n=3, odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.06), age (n=3, odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.47), body mass index (n=2, odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.62), and levator defect (n=2, odds ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-6.18) are statistically significant risk factors, and cesarean delivery (n=2, pooled odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.20) and smoking (n=3, odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.75) are protective factors for primary prolapse. Parity, vaginal delivery, and levator hiatal area are identified as "confirmed risk factors." For prolapse recurrence, preoperative prolapse stage (n=5, odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-3.73) and age (n=2, odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-6.08) are statistically significant risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal delivery, parity, birthweight, age, body mass index, levator defect, and levator hiatal area are risk factors, and cesarean delivery and smoking are protective factors for primary prolapse. Preoperative prolapse stage and younger age are risk factors for prolapse recurrence after native tissue surgery.

International Urogynecological Consultation (IUC): pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This manuscript is the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) chapter one, committee three, on the Pathophysiology of Pelvic Organ Prolapse assessing genetics, pregnancy, labor and delivery, age and menopause and animal models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international group of urogynecologists and basic scientists performed comprehensive literature searches using pre-specified terms in selected biomedical databases to summarize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of the development of POP, exploring specifically factors including (1) genetics, (2) pregnancy, labor and delivery, (3) age and menopause and (4) non-genetic animal models. This manuscript represents the summary of three systematic reviews with meta-analyses and one narrative review, to which a basic scientific comment on the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms was added.

RESULTS

The original searches revealed over 15,000 manuscripts and abstracts which were screened, resulting in 202 manuscripts that were ultimately used. In the area of genetics the DNA polymorphisms rs2228480 at the ESR1 gene, rs12589592 at the FBLN5 gene, rs1036819 at the PGR gene and rs1800215 at the COL1A1 gene are significantly associated to POP. In the area of pregnancy, labor and delivery, the analysis confirmed a strong etiologic link between vaginal birth and symptoms of POP, with the first vaginal delivery (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.81-3.88) and forceps delivery (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.24-3.83) being the main determinants. Regarding age and menopause, only age was identified as a risk factor (OR : 1.102; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19) but current data do not identify postmenopausal status as being statistically associated with POP. In several animal models, there are measurable effects of pregnancy, delivery and iatrogenic menopause on the structure/function of vaginal support components, though not on the development of POP.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetics, vaginal birth and age all have a strong etiologic link to the development of POP, to which other factors may add or protect against the risk.

Injury-associated levator ani muscle and anal sphincter ooedema following vaginal birth: a secondary analysis of the EMRLD study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether all three components of the levator ani muscle (pubovisceral [= pubococcygeal], puborectal and iliococcygeal) and the external anal sphincter are equally affected by oedema associated with muscle injury after vaginal birth.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan.

POPULATION

Primiparous women classified as high risk for levator ani muscle injury during childbirth.

METHOD

MRI scans obtained 6-8 weeks postpartum were analysed. Muscle oedema was assessed on axial and coronal fluid-sensitive magnetic resonance (MRI) scans. Presence of oedema was separately determined in each levator ani muscle component and in the external anal sphincter for all subjects. Descriptive statistics and correlation with obstetric variables were obtained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Oedema score on fluid-sensitive MRI scans.

RESULTS

Of the 78 women included in this cohort, 51.3% (n = 40/78) showed muscle oedema in the pubovisceral (one bilateral avulsion excluded), 5.1% (n = 4/78) in the puborectal and 5.1% (n = 4/78) in the iliococcygeal muscle. No subject showed definite oedema on external anal sphincter. Incidence of oedema on the pubovisceral muscle was seven times higher than on any of the other analysed muscles (all paired comparisons, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of muscle tearing, the pubovisceral muscle shows by far the highest incidence of injury, establishing that levator components are not equally affected by childbirth. External anal sphincter did not show oedema-even in women with sphincter laceration- suggesting a different injury mechanism. Developing a databased map of injured areas helps understand injury mechanisms that can guide us in honing research on treatment and prevention.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Injury-associated levator ani muscle and anal sphincter oedema mapping on MRI reveals vulnerable muscle components after childbirth.

Vaginal birth after Cesarean section and levator ani avulsion: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and enlargement of the levator hiatus following vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) in comparison with vaginal delivery in primiparous women.

METHODS

In this two-center observational case-control study, we identified all women who had a term VBAC for their second delivery at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and the 1^st Faculty of Medicine in Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic, between 2012 and 2016. Women with a repeat VBAC, preterm birth or stillbirth were excluded from the study. As a control group, we enrolled a cohort of primiparous women who delivered vaginally during the study period. To increase our control sample, we also invited all primiparous women who delivered vaginally in both participating units between May and June 2019 to participate. All participants were invited for a four-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound scan to assess LAM trauma. LAM avulsion and the area of the levator hiatus were assessed offline from the stored pelvic floor volumes obtained at rest, during maximum contraction and during Valsalva maneuver. The laterality of the avulsion was also noted. The cohorts were then compared using the χ² test and Wilcoxon's two-sample test according to the normality of the distribution. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate regression analysis, controlling for age and body mass index (BMI), was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 356 women had a VBAC for their second delivery during the study period. Of these, 152 (42.7%) attended the ultrasound examination and full data were available for statistical analysis for 141 women. The control group comprised 113 primiparous women. A significant difference was observed between the VBAC group and the control group in age (32.7 vs 30.1 years; P < 0.05), BMI (28.4 vs 27.4 kg/m² ; P < 0.05) and duration of the first and second stages of labor (293.1 vs 345.9 min; P < 0.05 and 27.6 vs 35.3 min; P < 0.05, respectively) at the time of the index birth. The LAM avulsion rate was significantly higher in the VBAC compared with the control group (32.6% vs 18.6%; P = 0.01). The difference between the groups was observed predominantly in the rate of unilateral avulsion and remained significant after controlling for age and BMI (adjusted odds ratio 2.061 (95% CI, 1.103-3.852)). There was no statistically significant difference in the area of the levator hiatus at rest (12.0 vs 12.6 cm² ; P = 0.28) or on maximum Valsalva maneuver (18.6 vs 18.7 cm² ; P = 0.55) between the VBAC and control groups. The incidence of levator hiatal ballooning was comparable between the groups (17.7% and 18.6%; P = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

VBAC is associated with a significantly higher rate of LAM avulsion than is vaginal birth in nulliparous women. The difference was significant even after controlling for age and BMI. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Has the prevalence of levator avulsion after forceps delivery changed over the last six decades? A retrospective study in a urogynaecological population

OBJECTIVE

Forceps delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal birth trauma. It is speculated that it is due to sub-optimal use of forceps in inexperienced hands. The aim of this study was to determine the association between time of forceps birth and prevalence of levator avulsion over the last six decades.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of datasets of women with a history of forceps delivery, seen at a tertiary urogynaecological centre between January 2014 and August 2018. They had undergone a standardized interview, clinical examination and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Archived imaging data was reviewed for levator avulsion offline at a later date, blinded against all clinical data. Associations between levator avulsion, maternal age at first vaginal birth, the weight of the first vaginally born baby, and time since forceps delivery categorised by decade were tested by univariable analysis. Factors found to be significant on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to test the association between prevalence of levator avulsion and time of forceps delivery while controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 2026 patients were seen during the study period. Among them 511 (25.2%) had a history of forceps delivery. Fourteen volume datasets were incomplete or missing, leaving 497 complete datasets for analysis. Mean age at presentation was 58 ± 12 years (23-91). Mean body mass index was 29 ± 6 kg/m². Mean age at first delivery was 25 ± 5 years. Mean birth weight of the first vaginal birth was 3454 ± 557 g. 457 women (92%) had had one forceps delivery, 31 had two forceps deliveries (6%) and 9 had three forceps deliveries (2%). Mean time interval between forceps delivery and assessment was 32 ± 13 years (0.3-64.8). 229 women (46%) were diagnosed with levator avulsion. The prevalence of avulsion after forceps increased significantly from 34% to 56% between 1950 and 2017 (P = 0.04). However this difference became insignificant when controlling for maternal age at 1st vaginal delivery and birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a changed prevalence of levator avulsion at forceps delivery over the last 67 years.

Levator ani avulsion: a Systematic evidence review (LASER)

BACKGROUND

There is variation in the reported incidence rates of levator avulsion (LA) and paucity of research into its risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the incidence rate of LA by mode of birth, imaging modality, timing of diagnosis and laterality of avulsion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and MIDIRS with no language restriction from inception to April 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

A study was included if LA was assessed by an imaging modality after the first vaginal birth or caesarean section. Case series and reports were not included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

RevMan v5.3 was used for the meta-analyses and SW SAS and STATISTICA packages were used for type and timing of imaging analyses.

RESULTS

We included 37 primary non-randomised studies from 17 countries and involving 5594 women. Incidence rates of LA were 1, 15, 21, 38.5 and 52% following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum, spatula and forceps births, respectively, with no differences by imaging modality. Odds ratio of LA following spontaneous birth versus caesarean section was 10.69. The odds ratios for LA following vacuum and forceps compared with spontaneous birth were 1.66 and 6.32, respectively. LA was more likely to occur unilaterally than bilaterally following spontaneous (P < 0.0001) and vacuum-assisted (P = 0.0103) births but not forceps. Incidence was higher if assessment was performed in the first 4 weeks postpartum.

CONCLUSIONS

LA incidence rates following caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were comparable tools for LA diagnosis.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Levator avulsion incidence rates after caesarean, spontaneous, vacuum and forceps deliveries were 1, 15, 21 and 52%, respectively.

Postpartum ultrasound for the diagnosis of obstetrical anal sphincter injury

This review presents the available data on the diagnosis of obstetrical anal sphincter injury by postnatal ultrasound imaging. There is increasing evidence that anal sphincter tears are often missed after childbirth and, even when diagnosed, often suboptimally repaired, with a high rate of residual defects after reconstruction. Even after postpartum diagnosis and primary repair, 25% to 50% of patients will have persistent anal incontinence. As clinical diagnosis may fail in the detection and classification of obstetrical anal sphincter injury, the use of imaging has been proposed to improve the detection and treatment of these lacerations. Notably, 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is considered the gold standard in the detection of obstetrical anal sphincter injury, and recently, 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound, commonly available in obstetrical and gynecologic settings, has proven to be effective as well. Avoidance of forceps delivery when possible, performance of a rectal examination after vaginal delivery and before repair of any severe perineal tear, and offering sonographic follow-up at 10 to 12 weeks after vaginal delivery in high-risk women (maternal age of ≥35 years, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, forceps, prolonged second stage of labor, overt obstetrical anal sphincter injury, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia) may help reduce morbidity arising from anal sphincter tears.

Forceps and vacuum: one goal, two entities

Damage to the pelvic floor during pregnancy and vaginal delivery is an inevitable consequence of the natural birthing process. As this damage is associated with functional and anatomical problems in later life, minimizing pelvic floor damage during pregnancy and vaginal delivery may serve as an important factor in the prevention of these unwanted sequelae. Operative vaginal delivery using forceps or vacuum extractor is common practice to achieve or expedite vaginal birth for maternal or fetal indications such as maternal exhaustion or fetal distress. However, operative vaginal delivery is associated with more extensive damage to the pelvic floor and perineal structures with forceps carrying a stronger risk compared to vacuum. The evidence on this subject is discussed with possible suggestions to minimize pelvic floor damage as much as possible.

Rotational forceps: a retrospective study evaluating anatomical and functional consequences for the pelvic floor

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The use of Kielland's rotational forceps is considered to involve greater technical difficulty and may be associated with a higher rate of pelvic floor trauma. Our main objective was to evaluate the association between avulsion of the levator muscle and rotational and non-rotational forceps.

METHODS

This was an observational study carried out at a tertiary hospital that recruited singleton cephalic vaginally primiparous women with previous Kielland's forceps delivery between March 2012 and May 2017. Patients were retrieved from a local database, contacted consecutively and blinded to all clinical data. Power calculations determined a sample of n = 160 patients. All women underwent a urogynecological interview, clinical examination and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS). The 4D TLUS volumes were stored and analyzed offline by an experienced ultrasound examiner who was blinded to all clinical data.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were available for analysis. Rotational forceps accounted for 27.3% (45 out of 165) of the study sample. Avulsion was present in 41.8% (69 out of 165) of all forceps deliveries. On multivariate analysis, rotational forceps was associated with avulsion, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.57 (CI 95% 1.20-5.62, p = 0.016). Body mass index at the beginning of gestation was found to be a protective factor, with an adjusted OR of 0.918 (CI 95% 0.847-0.986, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Rotational forceps is associated with a higher avulsion rate than non-rotational forceps, with an adjusted OR of over 2.5. Obstetricians need to consider the potential long-term consequences of performing a rotational forceps for mothers.

Obstetric risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pregnancy and childbirth are considered risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, including anorectal dysfunction. We aimed to assess the effect of obstetric events on anal incontinence and constipation after delivery.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. We included studies in women after childbirth examining the association between obstetric events and anorectal dysfunction assessed through validated questionnaires. We selected eligible studies and clustered the data according to the type of dysfunction, obstetric event and interval from delivery. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and we performed a random-effects meta-analysis and reported the results as odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using I² statistics.

RESULTS

Anal sphincter injury (OR: 2.44 [1.92-3.09]) and operative delivery were risk factors for anal incontinence (forceps-OR :1.35 [1.12-1.63]; vacuum-OR: 1.17 [1.04-1.31]). Spontaneous vaginal delivery increased the risk of anal incontinence compared with caesarean section (OR: 1.27 [1.07-1.50]). Maternal obesity (OR:1.48 [1.28-1.72]) and advanced maternal age (OR: 1.56 [1.30-1.88]) were risk factors for anal incontinence. The evidence on incontinence is of low certainty owing to the observational nature of the studies. No evidence was retrieved regarding constipation after delivery because of a lack of standardised validated assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides anal sphincter injury, forceps delivery, maternal obesity and advanced age were associated with higher odds of anal incontinence, whereas caesarean section is protective. We could not identify obstetric risk factors for postpartum constipation, as few prospective studies addressed this question and none used a standardised validated questionnaire.

Pregnancy, labour and delivery as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy and childbirth are considered risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The long latency between obstetric events and morbidity hinders the establishment of cause-effect relationships. Recently, intermediate outcomes such as organ descent and levator avulsion (LA) have been identified. We aimed to assess the effect of obstetric events on symptoms and signs of POP and on LA.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library. We included studies in women examining associations between obstetric events and symptoms and signs of POP and LA, assessed through questionnaires, clinical examination and pelvic floor imaging. Two reviewers evaluated the studies for eligibility and for methodological quality/susceptibility to bias. We extracted study results and clustered them by outcome: symptoms of POP (sPOP), clinical findings of POP (cPOP) and LA. When appropriate, we performed a random-effect meta-analysis and reported the summary odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

The first vaginal delivery was a risk factor for POP as measured by sPOP (OR: 2.65 [1.81-3.88]), cPOP (OR: 4.85 [2.15-10.94]) and in association with LA (OR: 41.6 [4.13- 419.41]). Forceps delivery was a risk factor for POP as measured by sPOP (OR: 2.51 [1.34-4.69]), cPOP (OR: 1.68 [1.21-2.34]) and in association with LA (OR: 5.92 [3.75-9.34]). Birth exclusively by caesarean was protective for sPOP (OR: 0.38 [0.29-0.51]) and for cPOP (OR: 0.29 [0.20-0.41]) and it did not confer any additional risk compared to nulliparity.

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms a strong aetiological link between vaginal birth and POP, with the first vaginal and forceps delivery being the main determinants.

Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The term 'maternal birth trauma' has undergone substantial changes in meaning over the last 2 decades. Leaving aside psychological morbidity, somatic trauma is now understood to encompass not just episiotomy, perineal tears and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), but also trauma to the levator ani muscle. This review covers diagnosis of maternal birth trauma by translabial ultrasound imaging.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS

Tomographic imaging of pelvic structures with the help of 4D ultrasound, used since 2007, has allowed international standardization and seems to be highly reproducible and valid for the diagnosis of OASI and levator avulsion.

CONCLUSIONS

Translabial and exo-anal ultrasound allows the assessment of maternal birth trauma in routine clinical practice and the utilization of avulsion and sphincter trauma as key performance indicators of maternity services. It is hoped that this will lead to a greater awareness of maternal birth trauma among maternity caregivers and improved outcomes for patients, both in the short term and in the decades to come.

Short statured primigravidae: Options for the obstetric management from a survey of UK obstetricians

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current antenatal and intrapartum management options for primigravid women of short stature with a clinically large fetus by a survey of UK Obstetricians.

STUDY DESIGN

An online survey comprised of 15 questions including the options on timing and mode of delivery, counselling about the risk of long-term pelvic floor morbidity following spontaneous vaginal and instrumental deliveries, choice of instruments and the role of episiotomy. The survey was sent to the participants as a part of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) Newsletter between September 2017 to October 2018. The scenario described was of a primigravid short stature woman (i.e. height of 160 cm or less) who presents with a clinically large fetus at 38 weeks gestation.

RESULTS

424 Obstetricians participated in the survey. The participation ratio cannot be identified as the survey was emailed as a part of the RCOG Newsletter. Sixty five percent respondents stated that they would scan for estimated fetal weight, 48 % would offer induction of labour at 40 weeks and 14 % would offer an elective/planned caesarean section (CS) at 39-40 weeks. Fifty nine percent would discuss all these risks: obstructed labour, shoulder dystocia, instrumental delivery and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). 73 % would not discuss the long-term risks of urinary and/or faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In the presence of failure to progress in the second stage of labour, 69 % would attempt a rotational instrumental delivery and 5% would offer a caesarean section. Manual rotation and 'straight' forceps application were the most frequent type of rotational delivery, followed by Ventouse and Kiellands forceps. Thirty four percent stated that they do not routinely perform an episiotomy in this scenario. Seventy three percent stated that their choice of instrument was not based on the long-term risk of urinary and faecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that 40 % of the respondents would not discuss all of the complications after vaginal delivery in women of short stature. The most common delivery option would be vaginal delivery.

Risk Factors for Urinary Incontinence in Primiparous Adolescents after Vaginal Delivery: A Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate urinary incontinence (UI) risk factors in primiparous adolescents between 7 and 48 months after vaginal delivery.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Physical Therapy Laboratory on Women's Health and Pelvic Floor at the Federal University of Pernambuco.

PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cohort follow-up time was 7-48 months after delivery, guaranteeing that no participant presented with UI until 7 months after the infant's birth. Primiparous adolescents aged 10-19 years were included in the study, and those who had UI during pregnancy were excluded. Sample size was estimated at 140 volunteers, considering the calculation for logistic regression, with 20 observation units for each of the 7 variables proposed in the theoretical model developed for the study. The volunteers answered the evaluation form, providing information on the outcome of interest and possible risk factors. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The following risk factors for UI were identified in primiparous adolescents after vaginal delivery: episiotomy (Relative risk [RR]_a, 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-6.06), large newborn for gestational age (RR_a, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.68-12.46) and less than six prenatal appointments (RR_a, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.05-6.04).

CONCLUSION

Professionals working in maternal health care should pay special attention to primigravid mothers, guide prenatal appointments, avoid routine episiotomy, and use obstetric practices recommended by the World Health Organization.

Pelvic floor assessment using magnetic resonance imaging after vaginal delivery and elective caesarean delivery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to compare quantitative static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of pelvic floor changes during postpartum recovery from 1 week to 6 months after different modes of delivery.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 51 primiparous women (vaginal delivery group: 30 women; elective caesarean delivery group: 21 women) underwent static and dynamic MRI at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum to measure pelvic floor MRI values. Between-group differences in pelvic floor values at these time points were determined; subsequently, within-group comparisons according to time were performed. Analysis included independent samples t-tests and paired t-tests.

RESULTS

The puborectal hiatus line (H line), muscular pelvic floor relaxation line (M line), bladder-pubococcygeal line (B-PCL), and uterus-pubococcygeal line (U-PCL) differed significantly between groups during the Valsalva manoeuvre at 1 week postpartum (p < 0.05). The H line, M line, and B-PCL values differed significantly between groups during the Valsalva manoeuvre at 6 weeks postpartum (p < 0.05). There were few significant between-group differences in pelvic floor values at 3 months and 6 months postpartum. In the vaginal delivery group, the differences in the H line and M line at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months postpartum were significant (p < 0.001). In the elective caesarean delivery group, U-PCL differed significantly at 6 weeks compared to 1 week postpartum during the Valsalva manoeuvre (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic floor recovery primarily occurred during the early phase after delivery in both groups. Elective caesarean delivery had a non-significant protective effect on postpartum pelvic floor structure and function compared to vaginal delivery.

The effect of replacing vacuum with forceps in operative vaginal delivery: an observational study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

An increase in vaginal delivery with forceps may increase rates of pelvic floor trauma. This study was designed to predict trauma rates resulting from policies preferencing forceps.

METHODS

This is an observational cohort study utilizing data from 660 primiparae enrolled in an RCT in two tertiary obstetric units in Sydney, Australia. Participants were assessed clinically and with 4D translabial ultrasound in the late third trimester and again at 3-6 months postpartum. Incidence of trauma associated with mode of delivery was adjusted to reflect change associated with a conversion of vacuum to forceps delivery. Primary outcome measures were third-/fourth-degree tear, levator avulsion (LA) and external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma diagnosed sonographically.

RESULTS

Five hundred four women were seen at a mean of 5.1 (2.3-24.3) months postpartum. After exclusion of 21 because of missing data, 483 women were analysed: 112 (23%) had a CS, 268 (55%) a normal vaginal delivery (NVD), 69 (14%) a vacuum (VD) and 34 (7%) a forceps (FD). One hundred fifty-two women had EAS trauma and/or LA; 17 sustained both. After VD, 32/69 (46%) women suffered LA and/or EAS trauma; after FD, it was 33/34 (97%). Converting VD to FD was estimated to result in an increase in trauma from 152/483 (31%) to 187/483 (39%). A formula can be generated based on local obstetric and ultrasound data to estimate trauma incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

A change in obstetric practice resulting in the conversion of primary VD to primary FD would be expected to substantially increase the likelihood of pelvic floor trauma.

Change in prevalence of major levator ani muscle defects from 6 weeks to 1 year postpartum, and maternal and obstetric risk factors: A longitudinal ultrasound study

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed first to investigate the change in prevalence of major levator ani muscle (LAM) defects, also called avulsions, from 6 weeks to 1 year postpartum, and second to assess maternal and obstetric risk factors for having persistent major LAM defects/avulsions at 1 year postpartum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study including 300 nulliparous women at 17-19 weeks of gestation. Major LAM defects were diagnosed at 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum using transperineal ultrasonography. We defined persistent major LAM defects as a defect diagnosed both at 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum. Maternal and obstetric data were obtained from the hospital's electronic birth records. Pelvic floor muscle function was measured vaginally by manometer at 21 weeks of gestation. The main outcome measurement was change in prevalence of major LAM defects. Maternal and obstetric risk factors for having persistent major LAM defect were also assessed.

RESULTS

Prevalence of major LAM defects was 19.4% at 6 weeks and 10.4% at 1 year postpartum. No new major LAM defects were diagnosed at 1 year postpartum. Persisting major LAM defects were associated with longer second stage of labor (median 74.5 minutes vs median 48.0 minutes, P = .012) and higher neonatal birthweight (mean difference of 232.3 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.5-443.1). Vacuum delivery was independently associated with persistent major LAM defects, adjusted OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.0-9.0).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 50% reduction of sonographically diagnosed major LAM defects from 6 weeks to 1 year postpartum. This finding suggests that assessment of the major LAM 6 weeks postpartum may be too early to diagnose defects/avulsions. Long second stage of labor, high neonatal birthweight and vacuum delivery were associated with persistent major LAM defects/avulsions.

Prevalence of levator ani avulsion in a multicenter study (PAMELA study)

PURPOSE

The objective is to determine the prevalence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion using four-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and according to delivery mode.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter study included 322 women evaluated at 6-12 months postpartum by four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound to identify levator ani muscle avulsion. The researcher who performed the ultrasound was blinded to all clinical data. Meaningful data about the birth were also recorded: mode of delivery, mother's age and body mass index, duration of second stage, episiotomy, perineal tearing, anesthesia, assistant, head circumference and fetal weight.

RESULTS

303 volumes were valid for evaluation. The overall prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion was 18.8% (95% CI 14.4-23.2%). In our multivariate analysis, only mode of delivery reached statistical significance as a risk factor for levator ani muscle avulsion (p < 0.001). The prevalence according to the different modes of delivery was 7.8% in spontaneous delivery, 28.8% in vacuum-assisted and 51.1% in forceps-assisted delivery. Compared with spontaneous delivery, the OR for LAM avulsion was 12.31 with forceps (CI 95% 5.65-26.80) and 4.78 with vacuum-assisted delivery (CI 95% 2.15-10.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Levator ani avulsion during vaginal delivery in primiparous women occurs in nearly one in every five deliveries. Delivery mode is a significant and modifiable intrapartum risk factor for this lesion. The incidence is lower in spontaneous delivery and significantly increases when an instrument is used to assist delivery, especially forceps.

Predictive factors for time to cessation of urinary incontinence in primiparous adolescents after vaginal delivery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate predictive factors for the time to cessation of urinary incontinence (UI) and estimate the median time for its cessation in primiparous adolescents after vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A cohort study with 102 adolescents aged 10-19 years with UI after vaginal delivery was developed in the Physical Therapy Laboratory for Women's Health and Pelvic Floor at the Federal University of Pernambuco between June 2017 and December 2019. Participants responded to the assessment form, providing information on the outcome of interest and possible predictive factors. For statistical analysis, the Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used.

RESULTS

Risk factors identified for the outcome of interest were: age 15-19 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_a ] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-2.8); non-instrumental delivery (HR_a 2.95. 95% CI 1.19-7.53); adoption of vertical position during the expulsion stage of delivery (HR_a 2.19, 95% CI 1.28-3.84); and absence of episiotomy (HR_a 2.01, 95% CI 1.2-3.44). The median time to cessation of UI was 16 months (10-29).

CONCLUSION

Health professionals should reflect on obstetric practices adopted during delivery in adolescents, especially among 10-14-year-olds, regarding the use of episiotomy, instrumental delivery, and parturient position during the expulsion stage of delivery.

Association between sexual dysfunction and avulsion of the levator ani muscle after instrumental vaginal delivery

INTRODUCTION

The effects of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion after instrumental delivery on the sexual function of patients are currently unknown. Therefore, the objective of our study was to use a validated questionnaire, namely, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), to compare the sexual function in patients with and without LAM avulsion after instrumental vaginal delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of 112 primiparous women after instrumental (vacuum or forceps) vaginal delivery. The obstetric and general characteristics of the population were studied. At 6 months postpartum, the contraceptive method used and the occurrence of LAM avulsion (using four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound) were determined, and the FSFI was administered.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (62 without avulsion and 38 with avulsion) completed the study. Thirty-eight (38%) were diagnosed with avulsion (42.1% after Kielland forceps delivery, 57.9% after Malmström vacuum delivery; P = .837). Women with LAM avulsion had significantly lower scores for desire (2.9 ± 1.2 vs 3.4 ± 1.1; P = .049), arousal (2.8 ± 1.7 vs 3.6 ± 1.4; P = .014), lubrication (2.3 ± 1.4 vs 3.0 ± 1.2; P = .011), orgasm (2.6 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 1.2; P = .006) and satisfaction (3.1 ± 1.8 vs 3.9 ± 1.5; P = .051) than did women without LAM avulsion. The overall FSFI score was lower in patients with avulsion (16.7 ± 8.9 vs 20.7 ± 6.9, P = .033). These results were obtained after controlling for confounders (delivery mode, induced labor, birthweight, perineal tears, avulsion degree, contraceptive method and group assignment for the parent study) in the multivariate analysis (F = 4.974, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LAM avulsion present a higher degree of sexual dysfunction compared wiith patients without avulsion at 6 months after instrumental vaginal delivery.