1000 Consecutive Cases of Laser-Assisted Liposuction Utilizing the 1440 nm Wavelength Nd:YAG Laser: Assessing the Safety and Efficacy

Risks and Complications Rate in Liposuction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liposuction is a surgical procedure used to remove localized excess adipose tissue. According to The Aesthetic Society's latest annual report, liposuction is the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure. Despite its popularity, the existing literature lacks a unified understanding of the risks associated with liposuction. The aim of this study was to measure complications of liposuction. A systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023471626). The primary outcome was overall complication rate. The absolute risk for individual complications was also assessed. From 2957 articles, 39 studies were selected for analysis. In total, 29,368 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.62 years and mean BMI of 26.36 kg/m2. Overall, the rate of any complication was 2.62 (95% CI, 1.78-3.84). The most common complication was contour deformity, with a prevalence of 2.35% (95% CI, 1.05%-5.16%). The prevalence of hyperpigmentation was 1.49% (95% CI, 1.12%-1.99%), seroma 0.65% (95% CI, 0.33%-1.24%), hematoma 0.27% (95% CI, 0.12%-0.60%), superficial burn 0.25% (95% CI, 0.17%-0.36%), allergic reaction 0.16% (95% CI, 0.050%-0.52%), skin necrosis 0.046% (95% CI, 0.013%-0.16%), generalized edema 0.041% (95% CI, 0.0051%-0.32%), infection 0.020% (95% CI, 0.010%-0.050%), venous thromboembolism 0.017% (95% CI, 0.0060%-0.053%), and local anesthesia toxicity 0.016% (95% CI, 0.0040%-0.064%). Liposuction is a safe procedure with low complications, of which contour deformity is the most common. Raising awareness of specific risks can enhance surgical outcomes and improve patient-physician understanding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Radiofrequency and pulsed electromagnetic field application following liposuction-Clinical evaluation of performance and safety

OBJECTIVE

With more than 1.5 million performed procedures, liposuction was the second most performed esthetic surgical procedure all over the world in males and in females in the year 2020. The objective of this open-label, evaluator-blinded study was to assess the efficacy and safety of an energy-based device that combines multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) in patients that underwent liposuction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 subjects, of whom 24 were females (80%), with a mean age of 48.4 ± 11.0 years (range: 27-69 years) and a mean weight of 69.5 ± 11.7 kg underwent unilateral treatment with radiofrequency and application of PEMF after bilateral liposuction. One month after the last of a total of six weekly treatments, skin elasticity, visco-elasticity and net elasticity, as well as subject reported satisfaction on a 5-point scale ranging from -1 (worse) to 3 (very much improved) and esthetic improvement ranging from 0 (very unsatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) rated by three independent reviewers were assessed.

RESULTS

Three independent and blinded reviewers rated the improvement of the treated side on average as 1.17 + 0.07 compared with baseline. Subjects were very satisfied with their treatment, with a mean score of 3.24 (0.03) out of 4 at the 1-month follow-up visit. Cutometer measurements showed no significant changes.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the subjective satisfaction with the results of the application of RF and PEMF after liposuction is high, while at the same time the esthetic appearance as rated by independent raters improved on the treated side.

The Application of Subcutaneous Radiofrequency After Liposuction for the Lower Face and Neck Contouring Under Local Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) is a new choice in energy-assisted body-contouring techniques. The purpose of this study is to observe the clinical effect and safety of RFAL on lower face and neck contouring under local anesthesia, and different outcome compared with traditional liposuction.

METHODS

From November 2016 to November 2020, a total of 72 patients with fat accumulation and skin laxity in lower face and neck, including 42 patients underwent subcutaneous radiofrequency after liposuction (group A) and 30 patients underwent traditional liposuction only (group B). The patient's parameters recorded involved age, sex, body mass index, the volume of fat aspirated, energy delivered, operative time, and complications. They were photographed for comparison before and after treatment. At 3 and 6 months after the operation, improvement in skin tightening and patient satisfaction was surveyed postoperatively and assessed by third-party surgeons.

RESULTS

At 6 months after the operation, evaluations scores of the contouring outcome had significant difference between 2 groups (3.0±0.9 versus 2.5±1.0, P =0.045). There was no significant difference at 3 months (2.8±1.0 versus 2.6±1.0, P =0.265). Although the satisfaction rate of group A was higher than that of group B both at 3 months (76.2% versus 66.7%) and 6 months (80.9% versus 60.0%), there were no significant differences in average score ( P >0.05). No significant complications or adverse events requiring further medical or surgical intervention after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous radiofrequency after Liposuction is a safe and effective treatment that can achieve significant improvement of the fat accumulation and skin laxity of the lower face and neck under local anesthesia.

Safety in office-based anesthesia: an updated review of the literature from 2016 to 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Office-based anesthesia (OBA) is rapidly growing across the world. Availability of less invasive interventions has facilitated the opportunity of offering new procedures in office-based settings to patient populations that would not have been considered in the past. This article provides a practical approach to discuss and analyze newest literature supporting different practices in the field of OBA. In addition, an update of the most recent guidelines and practice management directives is included.

RECENT FINDINGS

Selected procedures may be performed in the office-based scenario with exceedingly low complication rates, when the right patient population is selected, and adequate safety protocols are followed. Current regulations are focused on reducing surgical risk through the implementation of patient safety protocols and practice standardization. Strategies include cognitive aids for emergencies, safety checklists, facility accreditation standards among other.

SUMMARY

New evidence exists supporting procedures in the office-based scenario in areas such as plastic and cosmetic surgery, dental and oral surgery, ophthalmology, endovascular procedures and otolaryngology. Different systematic approaches have been developed (guidelines and position statements) to promote standardization of safe practices through emergency protocols, safety checklists, medication management and surgical risk reduction. New regulations and accreditation measures have been developed to homogenize practice and promote high safety standards.

Soft Tissue Contraction in Body Contouring With Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction: A Treatment Gap Solution

Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction is a relatively new concept in energy-assisted body contouring techniques and has received instrument approval. This supplemental article reviews the clinical application of electromagnetic energy via the BodyTite (InMode Corporation, Toronto, Canada) device on soft tissues during suction lipectomy, its effect on soft tissue contraction, and its use in aesthetic body contouring in various clinical scenarios.

[Liposuction]

Liposuction began in the 1920s when the Parisian surgeon Charles Dujarier became interested in body shaping and fat removal. Today, it is estimated that 1,453,000 liposuctions are annually performed worldwide. In Germany, 45,000 liposuctions are performed annually. The majority of liposuctions are performed as self-pay services. The aim of this article is to outline the development of liposuction, to explain the various liposuction procedures and methods, to clarify the indications for treatment, and point out the complications and pitfalls described in the literature.