Focus on the Importance of Lipomid-Abdominoplasty in the Body Contouring Surgery

ORUS: Ultrasonic Ostemodeling for Body Contouring

Background

An attractive waist-hip ratio leads to a favorable aesthetic appearance in women and can be achieved through the osteo remodelación ultrasónica simplificada (ORUS) technique, which consists of the controlled fracture of the floating ribs through a small incision in the back based on an umbrella's functioning (open-semiclosed).

Methods

The ORUS technique was performed on 120 patients between 18 and 50 years of age. Patients were grouped according to the surgical procedure performed: ORUS (11 patients), ORUS + liposuction (n = 87), and ORUS + abdominoplasty (n = 22). Demographic and clinical preoperative and postoperative data were recorded in all patients included. Measurements of waist-hip index and body mass index were done in centimeters, and at 90 days, a computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction was indicated.

Results

The surgery time depended on the procedure and varied from 30 minutes in the ORUS procedure to 180 minutes when it was combined with an abdominoplasty. A waist reduction was achieved with median preoperative measurements ranging from 89.0-110.0 to 65.0-69.0 cm depending on the procedure. The size of the incision did not exceed 1.2 cm, and only 2 patients had symptomatic atelectasis. The median total Body-QoL score ranged between 97 and 99 points from a maximum of 100 points.

Conclusions

The proposed ORUS technique achieved a waist and waist-hip index reduction with minor complications, a minimum scar, and a high satisfaction level.

TULUA Lipoabdominoplasty: Transversal Aponeurotic Plication, No Undermining, and Unrestricted Liposuction. A Multicenter Study of 845 Cases

BACKGROUND

TULUA (transverse plication, no undermining, full liposuction, neoumbilicoplasty, and low transverse abdominal scar) is the acronym for a radically different lipoabdominoplasty, intended to add simplicity, improve vascular safety, and attain good results. Modifications are unrestricted liposuction, no flap detachment, massive transverse infraumbilical plication, umbilicus amputation, neoumbilicoplasty, diminished tension wound closure, and low transverse scar settlement. The objectives of this article are to describe the technique and analyze a multicenter experience.

METHODS

Sixty-eight plastic surgeons from 10 countries provided data for a retrospective review of 845 patients. Aesthetic results were scored by each surgeon using the Salles scale and analyzed in combination with complications to identify associations between patient and surgery characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 95.5 percent were female, 19.7 percent were obese, 35.6 percent had prior scars, 10.4 percent had undergone previous abdominoplasty, 6.5 percent were postbariatric, and 6.6 percent were smokers. One patient had a kidney transplant, and 16.5 percent had comorbidities. Surgery characteristics varied widely, being on average as follows: lipoaspirate, 2967 ml; resection, 1388 g; and surgical time, 3.9 hours; 46.5 percent were not hospitalized. Averaged results were 8.68 of 10 points, besides adequate positioning and proportion of scar and umbilicus, without epigastric compensatory bulging (4.97 of 6 points). Overall complications were 16.2 percent, mostly seroma (8.8 percent); vascular-related complications (i.e., necrosis, wound dehiscence, and infection) constituted 2.7 percent. There were no fatalities. The logistic regression model demonstrated that smoking and obesity duplicate the risk of complications; if age older than 60 years is added, the risk of complication increases seven to nine times. Reported indications were multiple; however, pathologic diastasis was excluded.

CONCLUSION

TULUA lipoabdominoplasty is a new reproducible procedure with good quantified results and an acceptable complication rate.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Non-scarring Minimal Incision Neo-omphaloplasty in Abdominoplasty: The Alvarez Technique. A New Proposal

Background:

Abdominoplasties are increasingly requested aesthetic, reconstructive surgical procedures that, in most cases, have shown the disadvantage of leaving an often-notorious periumbilical scar due to hypertrophy, keloid, or because it simply remains very visible over time, after surgery. The Alvarez technique (or nonscarring minimal-incision neo-omphaloplasty) is a completely new, unprecedented technique because it does not leave visible scars. This technique requires the generation of four small flaps and a purse-string suture system interacting with the aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis muscles, as well as the modification of the vertical abdominal plication, and management of the subcutaneous cellular tissue in the new umbilicus area, which, if executed correctly, provide adequate aesthetic results.

Methods:

A multicentric case-series scientific study is presented with a total of 94 patients who underwent classical abdominoplasties and neo-omphaloplasties with the aforementioned technique from August 2018 to December 2020. Pre-surgical and postoperative photographic files were collected.

Results:

Of the 94 patients, there were eight (8.5%) cases of seroma, which are not attributable to neo-omphaloplasty but inherent to the use of drains. There were five (5.3%) cases of umbilical dehiscence. In total, 89.2% (84 patients) showed a very high degree of long-term satisfaction, and 10.6% (10 patients) had a medium level of long-term satisfaction.

Conclusions:

The Alvarez technique provides good aesthetic results that are well accepted among patients and surgeons, in the short and long term. It is useful for those patients who wish to undergo an abdominoplasty but cannot stand a scar in the umbilical region.

TULUA Lipoabdominoplasty: No Supraumbilical Elevation Combined With Transverse Infraumbilical Plication, Video Description, and Experience With 164 Patients

BACKGROUND

TULUA (transverse plication, undermining halted at umbilicus, liposuction [without restrictions], umbilicoplasty with a skin graft, and abdominoplasty with low transverse scar localization) is a fundamentally different lipoabdominoplasty technique intended to reduce the risk of vascular compromise, correct wall laxity through a unique plication, allow freedom in choosing the umbilical position, reduce tension on closure, and keep the final scar low.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this article were to describe the TULUA technique and its variations, delineate the indications and contraindications, show the expected results, and determine its safety profile.

METHODS

A series of 164 patients is presented. The technique's basic tenets were (1) infraumbilical wide transverse plication; (2) no undermining above the umbilicus; (3) unrestricted liposuction, including the supraumbilical tissues; (4) umbilical amputation and neoumbilicoplasty in the ideal position with a skin graft; and (5) low transverse scar placement. Complications were recorded and tabulated. Results were evaluated utilizing Salles' and the author's graded scales.

RESULTS

Scores averaged 9.4 out of 10 on the Salles' scale and 5.6 out of 6 on the author's scale, demonstrating adequate correction of the abdominal contour and the wall and skin laxity, with properly placed scars and umbilici, and without compensatory epigastric bulging. Overall, 20% of the patients experienced a complication: 9.7% experienced a delay in either the healing or graft take of the umbilicus, 0.6% developed skin necrosis, 0.6% experienced a wound dehiscence, 2.4% had an infection, and 4.9% developed a seroma.

CONCLUSIONS

The TULUA lipoabdominoplasty technique was found to improve abdominal wall laxity and aesthetics to a degree that is similar to traditional abdominoplasty, based on the evaluated parameters. The complications associated with the procedure are within the range of other abdominoplasty techniques, and the technique potentially has a reasonable safety profile with less risk of vascular compromise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4