Safety of ovarian preservation in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective study and meta-analysis

Predictive factors for adnexal involvement in endometrial cancer FIGO stage IIIA

OBJECTIVE

Understanding ovarian involvement incidence and risk factors in women with endometrial cancer may inform the decision of ovary preservation.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included all consecutive fully surgically staged patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between January 2005 and November 2021, assessing the incidence of ovarian metastasis, its role as a prognostic factor for recurrence and death, and evaluated predictors of adnexal involvement.

RESULTS

Women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIIA endometrial cancer comprised 2.3% of the population (36 of 1535 included patients), 23 (63.9%) with endometrioid histology, and a median age of 57.0 years (range 47.7-66.7). A higher body mass index, post-menopausal status, endometrioid histotype, and β-catenin expression were associated with a lower risk of adnexal involvement. Conversely, dMMR phenotype, p53 expression, myometrial infiltration >50%, lymphovascular space invasion, and cervical stromal invasion were independent predictors of an increased risk of adnexal involvement. A total of 145 (9.5%) patients had adnexal involvement, with an incidence rate of 0.27/100 person-days. Overall survival for FIGO (2009) stage IIIA was 88.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that ovarian preservation may be considered for younger patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (G1 and G2 tumors, absence of lymphovascular space invasion, no cervical involvement, and myometrial invasion <50%), adding a favorable predictive role to higher body mass index and high β-catenin expression.

Endometrial Cancer in Reproductive-Aged Females: Etiology and Pathogenesis

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, and the incidence is rising in premenopausal females. Type I EC is more common than Type II EC (80% vs. 20%) and is associated with a hyperestrogenic state. Estrogen unopposed by progesterone is considered to be the main driving factor in the pathogenesis of EC. Studies show that BMI > 30 kg/m2, prolonged duration of menses, nulliparity, presence of polycystic ovarian syndrome, and Lynch syndrome are the most common causes of EC in premenopausal women. Currently, there are no guidelines established to indicate premenopausal patients who should be screened. This review aims to synthesize current data on the etiology, risk factors, presentation, evaluation, and prognosis of endometrial cancer in this population.

The analysis of preoperative or intraoperative factors in predicting the escalation of surgical pathological staging of patients with clinical stage I endometrioid carcinoma: A retrospective clinical study

To retrospectively analyze the preoperative and intraoperative influencing factors in predicting the escalation of surgical pathological staging in patients with clinical stage I endometrioid carcinoma. Patients with clinical stage I endometrioid carcinoma at Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between January 2002 and December 2015 were enrolled in this study. Due to preoperative or intraoperative surgical exploration, the patients with one or more preoperative or intraoperative high-risk factors underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy, totaling 535 cases. The preoperative and intraoperative influencing factors that could lead to the escalation of postoperative surgical pathological staging were further analyzed. 1. There were 535 patients diagnosed with clinical stage I endometrioid carcinoma before surgery, 125 patients were upgraded with postoperative pathological staging, for a rate of 23.36%. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the prognosis in postoperative surgical pathological staging upgraded cases was worse than that in nonupgraded cases. The tumor-free survival and overall survival rates in the 2 groups were significantly different (P < .001). 3. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative degree of myometrial infiltration, intraoperative visual myometrial infiltration depth, massive size of tumor (diameter ≥ 4 cm) and preoperative abnormal serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level were associated with the escalation of surgical pathological staging (P < .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that massive size of tumor and preoperative serum abnormal CA125 level were independent predictors of whether postoperative pathological staging would be upgraded (P < .05). 4. The receiver operating characteristic curve drawn with the massive size of tumor and/or the preoperative serum CA125 level abnormality could be used to predict the probability of postoperative pathological upstaging. The results showed that the area from the combination of the 2 factors under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.723 (95% confidence interval, 0.672-0.773), suggesting that the combination of massive size of tumor and abnormal preoperative serum CA125 level may serve as an influencing factor for predicting the postoperative pathological staging upgrades. The clinical stage I endometrioid carcinoma patients with massive size of tumor and abnormal preoperative serum CA125 level need to be fully evaluated to ensure appropriate management as soon as possible, since they are more likely to experience postoperative pathological staging upgrades.

The Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma (2023)

BACKGROUND

Due to the increasing amount of published data suggesting that endometrial carcinoma is a heterogenic entity with possible different treatment sequences and post-treatment follow-up, the Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology (PSGO) has developed new guidelines.

AIM

to summarize the current evidence for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of endometrial carcinoma and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

The guidelines have been developed according to standards set by the guideline evaluation tool AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). The strength of scientific evidence has been defined in agreement with The Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System (AOTMiT) guidelines for scientific evidence classification. The grades of recommendation have been based on the strength of evidence and the level of consensus of the PSGO development group.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, both the implementation of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer patients at the beginning of the treatment sequence and the extension of the final postoperative pathological report of additional biomarkers are needed to optimize and improve treatment results as well as to pave the route for future clinical trials on targeted therapies.

Safety of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with FIGO stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed; patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with FIGO stage I grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and had at least 1 month of follow-up, were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2941 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 200 (6.8%) patients did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rate of ovarian preservation was comparable between patients with grade 2 (n=163, 6.6%) and grade 3 (n=37, 7.7%) tumors (p=0.38). Patients who did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were younger (median 39 vs 41 years, p<0.001) and less likely to undergo surgical lymph node assessment (52% vs 76.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (p=0.94); 5 year overall survival rates were 96.6% and 97%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, including tumor grade, ovarian preservation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with grade 2 and 3 FIGO stage I endometrioid carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy, ovarian preservation is rarely performed while no clear detrimental effect on overall survival was found.

Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer Group, Raffone A, Raimondo D, Maletta M, Saccone G, Travaglino A, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Mollo A. Impact of ovarian preservation on survival for women with endometrial carcinoma

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:

Primary objective will be to evaluate the impact of ovarian preservation on survival outcomes of women with endometrial cancer, while secondary objectives will be to evaluate the impact of ovarian preservation on adverse events and quality of life (QoL).

Characteristics and clinicopathological features of patients with ovarian metastasis of endometrial cancer: a retrospective study

There are no criteria for patient selection for ovarian-preserving surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). In this study, intraoperative findings of ovarian swelling (OvS) and the clinicopathological features of patients with EC with or without ovarian metastasis were analysed to identify risk factors for ovarian metastasis. Patients who underwent surgery for EC between 2012 and 2019 at our hospital were enrolled. In univariate analysis, all features were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and OvS were significant risk factors. In univariate analysis in stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. LSI, CSI, and OvS were significant risk factors in multivariate analysis. Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI and extrauterine lesions are appropriate for ovarian preservation. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The number of premenopausal patients with endometrial cancer (EC) is increasing. Bilateral oophorectomy for EC results in surgical primary ovarian insufficiency, and thus, surgery with ovarian preservation has been examined. However, there are few reports on risk factors for ovarian metastasis of EC and no established criteria for patient background or pathological factors to determine suitability for ovarian preservation surgery.What do the results of this study add? In univariate analysis, all pathological findings suggestive of disease progression were more frequent in cases with ovarian metastases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and ovarian swelling (OvS) were identified as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis. In an analysis of stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly more common in cases with ovarian metastasis, and LSI, CSI, and OvS emerged as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis in multivariate analysis.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without depth of myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI, or extrauterine lesions may be appropriate cases for ovarian preservation.

OPEC study: An international multicenter study of ovarian preservation in endometrial cancers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of ovarian preservation in early stage endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) patients aged 40 and below.

METHODS

A total of 11 institutions from eight countries participated in the study. 169 of 5898 patients aged ≤40 years were eligible for the study. Patients with EC treated between March 2007 and January 2019 were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up after EC diagnosis was 59 months (4-187). Among 169 participants, ovarian preservation surgery (OPS) was performed in 54 (31.9%), and BSO was performed in 115 (68.1%) patients. Although patients younger than 30 years of age were more likely to have OPS than patients aged 30 to 40 years (20.4% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.021), there was no significant difference by the mean age. There were no other relevant baseline differences between OPS and BSO groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in either the overall survival (P = 0.955) or recurrence-free survival (P = 0.068) among patients who underwent OPS, and BSO.

CONCLUSION

OPS appears to be safe without having any adverse impact on survival in women aged ≤40 years with FIGO Stage I EC.

Developing a validated nomogram for predicting ovarian metastasis in endometrial cancer patients: a retrospective research

OBJECTIVE

To explore risk factors and develop a prediction model for ovarian metastasis in endometrial cancer (EC), as well as providing provide a reference for clinical ovarian preservation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study enrolling 1496 EC patients having received complete staging surgery from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from 2012 to 2018. These patients were randomly divided into two cohorts: training cohort (n = 1046) and validation cohort (n = 448). A nomogram prediction model was developed based on univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), and multivariate logistic regression. Then, the nomogram model's performance was evaluated in discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility three aspects.

RESULTS

Parametrium invasion, lymph node metastasis, and oviduct metastasis were finally contained in the nomogram prediction model. The AUC of the model in the training cohort was 0.85 compared with 0.72 in the validation cohort. It also behaved well in calibration and had good clinical utility. With a threshold probability of 20% ~ 80%, the nomogram increased the net benefit by 0 ~ 13.6 per 100 patients than surgery for all patients upon validation.

CONCLUSIONS

We develop a nomogram with good performances for predicting ovarian metastasis in EC patients, which may help clinicians identify candidate patients appropriate for ovarian preservation in premenopausal EC patients.

Predictive Value of Serum Cytokeratin 19 Level for the Feasibility of Conserving Ovaries in Endometrial Cancer

Objective: To determine the predictive value of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) for evaluating the safety of ovarian preservation in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods: Five hundred and seventeen EC patients hospitalized from November 2010 to June 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Pre-operative tumor biomarkers including CA125, HE4, CK19, and CA19-9 were obtained. Predictive biomarkers associated with ovarian metastasis were selected using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression. The cut-off values were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression model was used to perform survival analysis.

Results: Among clinical parameters and biomarkers included, age > 65, type II EC, CA125 ≥ 35 u/ml, CK19 > 3.3 ng/ml, and myometrial invasion ≥ 50% depth appeared as significant predictors of the risk of ovarian involvement in univariable logistic analysis. In multivariable analysis, CK19 > 3.3 ng/ml (OR = 11.541, 95%CI: 1.968–67.668, P = 0.007) and Type II EC (OR = 8.336, 95%CI: 1.456–47.722, P = 0.017) were independent risk predictors of ovarian metastasis in pre-menopausal women. In pre-menopausal women with Type I EC (n = 142), CK19 level could satisfactorily predict the risk of ovarian metastasis (AUC = 0.860, 95%CI: 0.792–0.912, P < 0.001), and when the cut-off point was set as 2.45 ng/ml, the negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio were 99% and 0.19, with the maximum Youden index of 0.598.

Conclusions: The present study advocates the necessity of incorporating serum CK19 measurement into the pre-operative evaluation of EC, especially as extension of current standard approach with ovarian preservation counseling.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2020

In 2020 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology with providing representative figures of the most influential study for 1 of each 3 gynecologic cancers: cervix, ovary, and uterine corpus. Review for cervical cancer covered targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, adjuvant radiation therapy or concurrent/sequential chemoradiation therapy after radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, radical surgery in early cervical cancer; and prevention and screening. Ovarian cancer research included studies of various combinations of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and/or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors according to the clinical setting. For uterine corpus cancer, molecular classification upon which the decision of adjuvant treatments might be based, World Health Organization recommendation of 2-tier grading system (low grade vs. high grade), sentinel lymph node assessment and ovarian preservation in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer were reviewed. Molecular targeted agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors which showed promising anti-tumor activities in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer were also included in this review.

Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer: a 2-step schema

In 2020, endometrial cancer continues to be the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. The majority of endometrial cancer is low grade, and nearly 1 of every 8 low-grade endometrial cancer diagnoses occurs in women younger than 50 years with early-stage disease. The incidence of early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer is increasing particularly among women in their 30s. Women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer generally have a favorable prognosis, and hysterectomy-based surgical treatment alone can often be curative. In young women with endometrial cancer, consideration of ovarian conservation is especially relevant to avoid both the short-term and long-term sequelae of surgical menopause including menopausal symptoms, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, and osteoporosis. Although disadvantages of ovarian conservation include failure to remove ovarian micrometastasis (0.4%-0.8%), gross ovarian metastatic disease (4.2%), or synchronous ovarian cancer (3%-5%) at the time of surgery and the risk of future potential metachronous ovarian cancer (1.2%), ovarian conservation is not negatively associated with endometrial cancer-related or all-cause mortality in young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. Despite this, utilization of ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer remains modest with only a gradual increase in uptake in the United States. We propose a framework and strategic approach to identify young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer who may be candidates for ovarian conservation. This evidence-based schema consists of a 2-step assessment at both the preoperative and intraoperative stages that can be universally integrated into practice.

Surgical treatment and fertility perservation in endometrial cancer

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) represents a high health burden in Slovenia and worldwide. The incidence is increasing due to lifestyle and behavioural risk factors such as obesity, smoking, oestrogen exposure and aging of the population. In many cases, endometrial cancer is diagnosed at an early stage due to obvious signs and symptoms. The standard treatment is surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, depending on the stage of the disease and the risk of recurrence. However, treatment modalities have changed in the last decades, considerably in the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Conclusions

The gold standard of treatment for is surgery, which may be the only treatment modality in the early stages of low-grade tumours. In recent years, a minimally invasive approach with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed. A conservative approach with hormonal treatment is used if fertility preservation is desired. If EC is in advance stage, high-risk histology, or high grade, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both is recommended.

The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is a common gynecological malignant disease. Its incidence in women of reproductive age in developed countries is increasing. The standard treatment is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which has a significant impact on the quality of women’s lives and precludes further fertility. Conservative management to preserve reproductive function and delay final surgery can today be considered in carefully selected women. We analyze the current approaches to select appropriate candidates and current medical regimens for fertility sparing management. We elaborate on the future perspectives of management. With better characterization of the disease and implementation of molecular biomarkers, more women should be able to benefit from conservative approaches to management of endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The disease is diagnosed with increasing frequency in younger women, commonly also in their reproductive age. The standard treatment of endometrial cancer is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and this precludes future fertility in younger women. The current challenge is to identify the group of women with endometrial cancer and low-risk features that would benefit from more conservative treatment options. More focus in management needs to be aimed towards the preservation of quality of life, without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. In this review, we analyze the current approaches to identification of women for conservative management and evaluate the success of different medical options for treatment and surgical techniques that are fertility sparing. We also elaborate on the future perspectives, focusing on the incorporation of molecular characterization of endometrial cancer to fertility preservation algorithms. Future studies should focus specifically on identifying reliable clinical and molecular predictive markers in this group of young women. With improved knowledge and better risk assessment, the precision medicine is the path towards improved understanding of the disease and possibly widening the group of women that could benefit from treatment methods preserving their fertility.

Preoperative predictive factor analysis of ovarian malignant involvement in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

Earlier literature suggests that ovarian preservation in young premenopausal clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients does not negatively impact prognosis. The main purpose of this study was to clarify the incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in this group and further identify potential preoperative predictive factors of ovarian malignant involvement. A total of 511 premenopausal (age ≤ 50 years) patients were enrolled for the study at Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2002 and December 2016. Ovarian malignant involvements were detected in 23 of the patients (4.5%). Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis validated preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level as independent risk predictors of postoperative ovarian malignant involvement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was generated for a combination of the two factors. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.772 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.661–0.884) for the combined two factors. The incidence of postoperative ovarian malignant involvement was relatively minimal. Preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth and serum CA125 level were independent risk predictors of ovarian malignant involvement. These findings may facilitate preoperative counseling of patients and informed clinical decision-making on ovarian preservation in these patients.

Fertility-sparing Surgery for Patients with Cervical, Endometrial, and Ovarian Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Nearly 10% of the 1.3 million women living with a gynecologic cancer are aged <50 years. For these women, although their cancer treatment can be lifesaving, it's also life-altering because traditional surgical procedures can cause infertility and, in many cases, induce surgical menopause. For appropriately selected patients, fertility-sparing options can reduce the reproductive impact of lifesaving cancer treatments. This review will highlight existing recommendations as well as innovative research for fertility-sparing treatment in the 3 major gynecologic cancers.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

For early-stage cervical cancers, fertility-sparing surgeries include cold knife conization, simple hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, or radical trachelectomy with placement of a permanent cerclage. In locally advanced cervical cancer, ovarian transposition before radiation therapy can help preserve ovarian function. For endometrial cancers, fertility-sparing treatment includes progestin therapy with endometrial sampling every 3 to 6 months. After cancer regression, progestin therapy can be halted to allow attempts to conceive. Hysterectomy with ovarian preservation can also be considered, allowing for fertility using assisted reproductive technology and a gestational carrier. For ovarian cancers, fertility-sparing surgery includes unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (with lymphadenectomy and staging depending on tumor histology). With higher-risk histology or higher early-stage disease, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended-however, this carries a 3% to 10% risk of ovarian failure. Use of oocyte or embryo cryopreservation in patients with early-stage ovarian malignancy remains an area of ongoing research.

CONCLUSION

Overall, fertility-sparing management of gynecologic cancers is associated with acceptable rates of progression-free survival and overall survival and is less life-altering than more radical surgical approaches.

Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer

Objective

To identify the incidence of ovarian metastasis and the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes for early-stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer.

Methods

281 patients with stages IA2-IB1 adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHND) were included in the study. The incidence of ovarian metastasis was evaluated from 173 patients who underwent oophorectomy during RHND. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients less than 50 years (196 of 281 patients) who were classified into two groups, ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. 5-year recurrence-free survival (5-yr RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS) were evaluated and compared between these groups.

Results

There was no evidence of ovarian metastasis, synchronous ovarian cancer, or ovarian recurrence during follow-up. In patients less than 50 years of age, there were no statistically significant differences in the 5-yr RFS (P = 0.363), or 5-yr OS (P = 0.974) between the ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the ovarian preservation group seemed to have a slightly better OS in long-term follow-up (after 15 years); however, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Ovarian preservation was safe in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer stages IA2-B1. However, the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes needs to be further investigated.

A survey of French gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes toward conservative treatment for fertility preservation in young patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe knowledge and attitudes toward fertility preservation (FP) in patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma (EC/AH) among French gynecologists MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey among French gynaecologists: one questionnaire with one common part and two specific parts for gynecological surgeon (GS) or for specialists in reproductive medicine (SRM) was sent from April 2017 to April 2018. Knowledge and attitudes toward FP in EC/AH were evaluated with a "knowledge score" and an "attitudes score" using a four- or five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

One hundred forty physicians completed the survey (87 GS, 53 SRM). The knowledge score was low (59.3% medium/low), but it was significantly higher for GS compared to SRM. The better-known treatments were oral progestins and hysteroscopic resection. Among the participants treating EC/AH, 52.6% found it "difficult" to manage patients and 61.8% regretted the lack of official recommendations. Most physicians seemed to be uncomfortable/unsupportive with FP in EC/AH (57.2% "attitude score' below 11/20). There was a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude scores. GS "usually/always" give advice to patients about FP before EC/AH treatment. After maximum 3-6 months, 56.6% of SRM chose In Vitro Fecundation (IVF) to reduce time-to-pregnancy, with GnRH antagonist protocols (28%) or mild-stimulation (15.1%) to avoid hyperoestrogenism.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reassuring results in the literature, French gynecologists are uncomfortable with FP using EC/AH conservative management, which may be because of a lack of confidence in their knowledge. Specific guidelines are needed to help physicians manage these young patients and their fertility.

A preoperative prediction model for predicting coexisting adnexa malignancy of patients with G1/G2 endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify the predictors of coexisting adnexa malignancy (CAM) before surgery for patients with G1/G2 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).

METHODS

Patients with G1/G2 EEC who received surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 1996 to 2017 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify the predictors for CAM, and the nomogram was constructed and evaluated the discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Among the 1511 patients in the study cohort, 66 (4.4%) coexisted adnexa malignancy (51 metastatic and 15 synchronous primaries). In the univariate logistic regression analysis, CA125 level (>35 U/ml), histologic grades, myometrial invasion depth in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), adnexal involvement in MRI/surgical exploration (SEP) were found to be significant predictors for CAM (P < .001, 0.047, 0.011, <0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high CA125 level (P < .001; OR: 2.945; 95%CI: 1.700-5.101), deep myometrial invasion (P = .011; OR: 2.194; 95%CI: 1.200-4.011), and suspected adnexal involvement in MRI/SEP (P < .001; OR: 11.524; 95%CI: 6.726-19.744) were independent predictors for CAM (AUC = 0.786). In 338 patients with MMR results, eighty-seven (25.7%) were detected MSI-high. There were 5.7% (5/87) patients diagnosed with CAM in the MSI-high group compared with 4.4% (11/251) in the MSS group.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram with pre- and intra-operative factors was constructed to predict CAM in G1/G2 EEC patients, which may help clinicians in decision-making for ovarian preservation for these patients.

The survival effect of ovary preservation in early stage endometrial cancer: a single institution retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of ovary preserving surgery in early International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage endometrial cancer patients.

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 539 patients who were diagnosed with early stage endometrial cancer between Jan 2006 and Dec 2017. Patients were categorized into ovary preservation and ovary removal groups. Demographics, recurrence free survival (RFS), and five-year overall survival (OS) rate were compared, and the clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 85 months (range, 6-142 months), and the median age was 52.7 years. The mean age was higher in the ovary removal group than in the ovary preservation group (54.4 vs 40.94 years; P < 0.001). The ovary preservation group showed an earlier FIGO stage than the ovary removal group (P = 0.0264). There was a greater incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in the removal group. There were no statistical differences in other baseline characteristics. When comparing the RFS and OS rates, there were no statistical differences between the preservation and removal groups. (recurrence free rate 98.5% vs 92.7%, p = 0.4360, and 5-year survival rate 98.6% vs 93.0%, p = 0.0892, respectively). Endometrioid histology (p = 0.006) and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0062) were related to OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (p = 0.005) were related to RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovary preservation in early stage endometrial cancer is worth considering, as it does not affect survival in early stage endometrial cancer patients.

Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between ovarian conservation and oncologic outcome in surgically-treated young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study examined women aged <50 with stage I grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery with hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014 (US cohort n = 1196, and Japan cohort n = 495). Recurrence patterns, survival, and the presence of a metachronous secondary malignancy were assessed based on ovarian conservation versus oophorectomy.

RESULTS

During the study period, the ovarian conservation rate significantly increased in the US cohort from 5.4% to 16.4% (P = 0.020) whereas the rate was unchanged in the Japan cohort (6.3-8.7%, P = 0.787). In the US cohort, ovarian conservation was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.829, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.188-3.663, P = 0.805), overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.981), or metachronous secondary malignancy (HR 1.787, 95% CI 0.603-5.295, P = 0.295). In the Japan cohort, ovarian conservation was associated with decreased disease-free survival (HR 5.214, 95% CI 1.557-17.464, P = 0.007) and an increased risk of a metachronous secondary malignancy, particularly ovarian cancer (HR 7.119, 95% CI 1.349-37.554, P = 0.021), but was not associated with overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.987). Ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer occurred after a median time of 5.9 years, and all cases were salvaged.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that adoption of ovarian conservation in young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer varies by population. Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer may be potentially associated with increased risks of ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer in certain populations; nevertheless, ovarian conservation did not negatively impact overall survival.

Ovarian preservation for premenopausal women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a Chinese retrospective study

Objective

This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety of ovarian preservation of premenopausal women with stage 1a endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

We performed a population-based study to identify surgically treated stage Ia endometrial cancer of premenopausal women who were diagnosed between August 1989 and December 2015 in our center. Survival outcomes and recurrence rate were examined for premenopausal women who underwent ovarian preservation. Recurrence-free survival rates were calculated following generation of Kaplan–Meier curves and were compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the independent factors affecting the recurrence rate.

Results

Patients with ovarian preservation tended to be significantly younger at diagnosis, have less myometrial invasion, and were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy compared with women treated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups. In the Cox regression model, ovarian preservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival.

Conclusion

Ovarian preservation does not have a negative effect on oncological outcomes. Ovarian preservation can be applied to premenopausal women with stage Ia endometrial carcinoma.

Vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative treatment for endometrial cancer patients with medical co-morbidities precluding standard surgical procedures: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative strategy for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and medical co-morbidities precluding laparoscopic or abdominal procedures. The current study evaluates the prevalence of co-existent ovarian malignancy in patients with endometrial cancer and the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on survival outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 20, 2017 that investigated (1) the prevalence of co-existing ovarian malignancy (either metastases or primary synchronous ovarian cancer in women with endometrial cancer, and (2) the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on recurrence and/or survival rates.

RESULTS

Of the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients (n=6059), 373 were identified with metastases and 106 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Of the post-menopausal patients (n=6016), 362 were identified with metastases and 44 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Survival outcomes did not differ for pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (5-year overall survival rates were 89-94.5% and 86-97.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy seems to have a limited impact on disease outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. These results support the view that vaginal hysterectomy alone or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an option for patients with endometrial cancer who are not ideal surgical candidates.

Diagnostic efficacy of MRI for pre-operative assessment of ovarian malignancy in endometrial carcinoma: A decision tree analysis

AIM

Accurate preoperative assessment of ovarian malignancy in endometrial carcinoma helps in determining the decision to preserve the ovaries in individualized treatment. This study adopted decision tree method to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of pelvic MRI and clinical data of patients for preoperative identification of endometrial carcinoma-combined ovarian malignancy (EC-OM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included a total of 801 patients, and postoperative pathological examinations identified 58 EC-OM group and 743 endometrial carcinoma cases without ovarian malignancy (EC group). Diagnostic efficiency of pelvic MRI in EC-OM was calculated by comparing the clinical data and imaging features of patients in the two groups. Decision tree analysis was performed to screen out associative indexes and establish a diagnostic model for EC-OM.

RESULTS

Pelvic MRI showed that, EC-OM group showed deeper invasion into the myometrium, and higher percentages of patients with cervical or cornual involvement, or metastasis of lymph nodes or peritoneum than EC group (P = 0.00). Preoperative pelvic MRI showed a sensitivity of 51.72% and a specificity of 99.87% when detecting ovarian malignancy in endometrial carcinoma. Decision tree model obtained a sensitivity of 89.66%, with an AUC (area under ROC curve) of 0.949 (95% CI 0.906, 0.993, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Decision tree analysis based on pelvic MRI and clinical data of patients showed that the detection rate of ovarian malignancy could be increased for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Risk factors for ovarian involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer and study the possible risk factors.

METHODS

Premenopausal patients 45 years of age or younger with endometrioid endometrial cancer treated at the OB/GYN Hospital of Fudan University between 2009 and 2013 were identified. The incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer patients were calculated and the possible risk factors were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 144 younger (age ≤ 45, premenopausal) patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer were identified and coexisting malignant ovarian neoplasms were detected in 6 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that deeper myometrial invasion, positive lymphonode metastasis, positive LVSI, and high histologic grade (G2-G3) were associated with ovarian involvement in younger endometrial cancer patients. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only deep myometrial invasion was an independent risk factors for ovarian involvement (OR = 12.81, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

In conclusions, the incidence of coexisting ovarian malignant neoplasms in young and premenopausal patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer is low, and these findings may facilitate preoperative counseling of patients and decision making at the time of surgery.

Safety of ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with stage I uterine sarcoma

Objective

To evaluate the oncologic safety of ovarian preservation (OP) in premenopausal women diagnosed with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I uterine sarcoma.

Methods

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was accessed and a cohort of women aged ≤50 diagnosed between 1988–2013 with a sarcoma limited to the uterus was drawn. Based on site-specific surgery codes, women who underwent hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy and did not receive radiation therapy were selected for further analysis. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific (CSS) survival were determined following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves; comparisons were made with the log-rank test. A Cox-proportional hazard model was constructed to control for possible confounders.

Results

A total of 1,482 women were included in the analysis; 800 (54.0%) were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 520 (35.1%) with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), and 162 (10.9%) with adenosarcoma (AS). The OP group included 418 women (28.2%). Differences in the rate of OP were noted based on histology (p=0.014), year of diagnosis (p=0.001), patient age (p<0.001) and race (p=0.012). There was no difference in OS (p=0.220) or CSS (p=0.210) between women who had OP and those who did not. Multivariate analysis confirmed that OP was not associated with a worse mortality.

Conclusion

In this population-based cohort of women with sarcoma limited to the uterus, OP was not associated with worse oncologic outcomes. OP could be considered for women with LMS, sparing them from the morbidity associated with iatrogenic menopause. No conclusions could be made for those with LG-ESS or AS.

Fertility preservation for patients with gynecologic malignancies: The Korean Society for Fertility Preservation clinical guidelines

Fertility preservation plays a central role in cancer care since an increasingly large number of cancer patients are surviving as a result of improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Physicians who take part in the initial diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer should understand the importance of fertility preservation. Since indications for fertility preservation are limited to early-stage gynecologic cancer, a surgeon must carefully consider each indication. Before performing fertility-sparing surgery, health professionals should compare its oncologic and pregnancy outcomes with those of other standard treatments. Individualized treatment strategies should be delivered depending on the patient's situation, and physicians should provide timely information and appropriate counseling.

[Primary management of endometrial carcinoma. Joint recommendations of the French society of gynecologic oncology (SFOG) and of the French college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVES

The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers.

RESULTS

The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management.

Analysis of endometrial carcinoma in young women at a high-volume cancer center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, survival, and prognosis of endometrial cancer in women aged ≤40 years.

METHODS

Women who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer at a single high-volume cancer center between January 1995 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Women aged >40, patients with missing data, and those who did not undergo surgical staging were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with endometrial cancer were assessed. The median age at diagnosis was 38 (range, 21-40) years, and most of the uterine tumors found were early-stage (85%), low-grade (67.5%), and endometrioid carcinomas (97.5%). The median serum cancer antigen 125 level was 10.9 IU/mL (range, 3-1284 IU/mL). Optimal cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 35 patients (87.5%). All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, and 97.5% of the patients underwent hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Among the total group of 40 patients, 21 (52.5%) underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection, and 15 (37.5%) underwent only pelvic lymph node dissection. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a cancer antigen 125 level ≥35 was the only independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 22.997; 95% confidence interval, 1.783-296.536; p = 0.016) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 22.541; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-290.364; p = 0,017).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that a cancer antigen 125 level ≥ 35 is the only independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients aged ≤40 years with endometrial cancer.

Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To characterize contributing factors for ovarian conservation during surgical treatment for endometrial cancer and to examine the association of ovarian conservation on survival of young women with early-stage, low-grade tumors.

METHODS

This was a population-based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify surgically treated stage I type I (grade 1-2 endometrioid histology) endometrial cancer cases diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=86,005). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors for ovarian conservation. Survival outcomes and cause of death were examined for women aged younger than 50 with stage I type I endometrial cancer who underwent ovarian conservation (1,242 among 12,860 women [9.7%]).

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, grade 1 endometrioid histology, and tumor size 2.0 cm or less were noted to be independent factors for ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). For 9,110 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 1 tumors, cause-specific survival was similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy cases (20-year rates 98.9% compared with 97.7%, P=.31), whereas overall survival was significantly higher in ovarian conservation cases than oophorectomy cases (88.8% compared with 82.0%, P=.011). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.98, P=.036) and was independently associated with a lower cumulative risk of death resulting from cardiovascular disease compared with oophorectomy (20-year rates, 2.3% compared with 3.7%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, P=.029). Contrary, cause-specific survival (20-year rates 94.6% compared with 96.1%, P=.68) and overall survival (81.0% compared with 80.6%, P=.91) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,750 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 2 tumors.

CONCLUSION

Ovarian conservation is performed in less than 10% of young women with stage I type I endometrial cancer. Ovarian conservation is associated with decreased mortality in young women with stage I grade 1 tumors.

Ovarian preservation improves overall survival in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database, the Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database, the Chinese Journal Full-text Database, and the Wanfang Database to collect observational studies on the effects of ovary-saving surgery in comparison to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). The literature search included studies up to March 2017, and 10 retrospective cohort studies met our selection criteria. Random and fixed effect models revealed that ovarian preservation (OP) was associated with better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.99, P = 0.044), and was not associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) in pre-menopausal patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.32–4.72, P = 0.648; risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.59–2.10, P = 0.745). Preservation of the ovaries appears to be a safe option with significant benefit for this low risk population after a thorough preoperative evaluation and extensive intraoperative exploration.

Impact of Conservative Managements in Young Women With Grade 2 or 3 Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Confined to the Endometrium

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ovarian and/or uterine preservation in young patients with grade 2 or 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma confined to the endometrium.

METHODS/MATERIALS

A population-based analysis was conducted. The SEER'17 Database was used to identify women younger than 45 years with grade 2 or 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma confined to the endometrium from 1983 to 2012. A cohort of 1106 women was included: 849 underwent hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, 96 underwent hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, and 49 underwent uterine preservation. The demographics and survival rates according to the type of treatment administered were compared.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival probabilities were 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.8-96.2), 93.8% (95% CI, 85.8-97.4), and 78.2% (95% CI, 62.1-88.1) for patients who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, ovarian preservation, and uterine preservation, respectively (P < 0.001).The 5-year cancer-related survival probabilities were 99.3% (95% CI, 98.6-99.9), 98.9% (95% CI, 96.9-99.9), and 86.2% (95% CI, 75.7-98.2) for patients who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, ovarian preservation, and uterine preservation, respectively (P < 0.001).Patients who received uterine conservation had lower disease-specific (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 15.8 95% CI, 5.5-45.2) and overall survival probabilities (aHR, 6.6; 95% CI, 3.3-13.4) than did patients who underwent hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy. Ovarian conservation was not associated with decreased disease-specific (aHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.31-6.71) or overall (aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.17-1.90) survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian preservation has no impact on survival probability in patients with grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer confined to the endometrium. On the contrary, physicians and patients should be aware of the worse prognosis associated with uterine preservation.

Fertility-preservation in endometrial cancer: is it safe? Review of the literature

Almost 5% of women with endometrial cancer are under age 40, and they often have well-differentiated endometrioid estrogen-dependent tumors. Cancer survival rates have improved over the last decades so strategies to avoid or reduce the reproductive damage caused by oncologic treatment are needed. We reviewed the published literature to find evidence to answer the following questions: How should we manage women in reproductive age with endometrial cancer? How safe is fertility preservation in endometrial cancer? Can pregnancy influence endometrial cancer recurrence? What are the fertility sparing options available? Progestins may be prescribed after careful evaluation and counseling. Suitable patients should be selected using imaging methods and endometrial sampling since surgical staging will not be performed. Conservative treatment should only be offered to patients with grade 1 well-differentiated tumors, absence of lymph vascular space invasion, no evidence of myometrial invasion, metastatic disease or suspicious adnexal masses, and expression of progesterone receptors in the endometrium. The presence of co-existing ovarian metastatic of synchronous cancer should be investigated and ruled out before the decision to preserve the ovaries. The availability of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has made it possible for women with endometrial cancer to give birth to a child without compromising their prognoses. Gamete, embryo or ovarian tissue cryopreservation techniques can be employed, although the latter remains experimental. Unfortunately, fertility preservation is rarely considered. Current recommendations for conservative management are based on the overall favorable prognosis of grade 1 minimally invasive tumors. Selected patients with endometrial cancer may be candidates to a safe fertility-preserving management.

Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been developed by many organizations. Although these guidelines have much in common in terms of the practice of standard of care for uterine corpus cancer, practice guidelines that reflect the characteristics of patients and healthcare and insurance systems are needed for each country. The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) published the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic cancer treatment in late 2006; the second edition was released in July 2010 as an evidence-based recommendation. The Guidelines Revision Committee was established in 2015 and decided to produce the third edition of the guidelines as an advanced form based on evidence-based medicine, considering up-to-date clinical trials and abundant qualified Korean data. These guidelines cover screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment, and advanced and recurrent disease with respect to endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcoma. The committee members and many gynecologic oncologists derived key questions from the discussion, and a number of relevant scientific literatures were reviewed in advance. Recommendations for each specific question were developed by the consensus conference, and they are summarized here, together with other details. The objective of these practice guidelines is to establish standard policies on issues in clinical areas related to the management of uterine corpus cancer based on the findings in published papers to date and the consensus of experts as a KSGO Consensus Statement.

Care of survivors of gynecologic cancers

The number of cancer survivors is increasing and most healthcare providers will manage patients who have completed therapy for malignancy at some point. The care of survivors of gynecologic malignancies may seem daunting in a busy general gynecology practice. This paper intends to review the literature and suggest management of these women for the general gynecologist.

Utilization and Outcomes of Ovarian Conservation in Premenopausal Women With Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the trends in use and safety of ovarian conservation in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based analysis. The National Cancer Database was used to identify women younger than 50 years of age with stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium who underwent hysterectomy from 1998 to 2012. Patients were stratified based on whether they underwent oophorectomy or had ovarian conservation. Multivariable models were used to examine predictors of ovarian conservation and the association between ovarian conservation and survival.

RESULTS

The cohort of 15,648 women included 1,121 (7.2%) who had ovarian conservation and 14,527 (92.8%) who underwent oophorectomy. The rate of ovarian conservation was relatively stable from 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-9.7%) in 1998 to 7.1% (95% CI 5.8-8.7%) in 2012 (P=.91). Ovarian conservation was more commonly performed in younger women, black women, those with low-grade and earlier stage tumors, and in women treated at community hospitals. In a multivariable model, ovarian conservation was not independently associated with survival (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.37). Similarly, in a Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no association between ovarian conservation and survival (P=.19).

CONCLUSION

Ovarian conservation does not adversely affect survival for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Despite the oncologic safety of ovarian conservation, the majority of young women with endometrial cancer still undergo oophorectomy at the time of surgery.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

Survival Impact of Ovarian Preservation on Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this article was to investigate the survival impact of ovarian preservation in surgically treated patients with early-stage endometrial cancer using a meta-analysis.

Methods

Major online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, as well as Grey Literature database, were searched to collect studies on the effects of ovarian preservation compared with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) for surgical treatment in endometrial cancer patients. The literature search was performed up to April 2016. The results were analyzed using RevMan 5.0 software and Stata/SE 12.0 software.

Results

Totally, 7 retrospective cohort studies including 1419 patients in ovarian preservation group and 15,826 patients in BSO group were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between the patients treated with ovarian preservation and BSO (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–1.39; P = 1.00). Similar result was achieved in the young and premenopausal women (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.70–1.39; P = 0.39). Furthermore, the disease-free survival of patients whose ovaries were preserved was slightly compromised but with no statistical significance (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.56–3.93; P = 0.42).

Conclusions

Ovarian preservation may be safe in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, and it could be cautiously considered in treating young and premenopausal women because it is not associated with an adverse impact on the patients’ survival. Given the inherent limitations of the included studies, further well-designed randomized controlled trial are needed to confirm and update this analysis.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

Ovarian involvement in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of uterus

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian preservation is an option for some premenopausal patients with early stage endometrial cancer. Studies have shown that ovarian preservation in selected patients does not negatively impact survival outcomes. The objective of this study is to determine the frequency and characteristics of ovarian involvement when endometrial cancer is clinically confined to the uterus.

METHODS

Patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of uterus treated at our institution between 2000 and 2013 were identified. Patients with ovarian metastasis or synchronous primary ovarian cancer were included. Patients were excluded if there was gross extrapelvic disease on examination or imaging.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifty-nine patients were found to have endometrial cancer with the disease confined to the pelvis (stages I, II, and III). Fifteen patients (2%) had ovarian metastasis. Twenty-three patients (3%) had synchronous uterine and ovarian cancer. Most ovarian lesions (32 out of 38) were either enlarged or had abnormal appearing surface involvement. Six patients had microscopic ovarian involvement, accounting for 0.8% of the endometrial cancer patients with pelvis-confined disease. All of the patients were greater than 50 years of age. For those patients with microscopic ovarian metastasis, all had FIGO grade 3 disease, deep myometrial invasion, and extrauterine involvement of either cervix or lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic ovarian involvement occurred in 0.8% of patients with endometrial cancer. For premenopausal patients with endometrial cancer, normal appearing ovaries may be considered for preservation in the absence of extrauterine spread, grade 3 disease and deep myometrial invasion.

Preserving fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer: current perspectives

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and affects predominantly postmenopausal women. It is estimated, however, that 15%–25% of women will be diagnosed before menopause. As more women choose to defer childbearing until later in life, the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing EC management have been increasingly studied. Definitive treatment of total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy precludes future fertility and may thus be undesirable by women who wish to maintain their reproductive potential. However, the consideration of conservative management carries the oncologic risks of unstaged EC and the risk of missing a synchronous ovarian cancer. It is further complicated by the lack of consensus regarding the initial assessment, treatment, and surveillance. Conservative treatment with progestins has been shown to be a feasible and safe fertility-sparing approach for women with low grade, early stage EC with no myometrial invasion. The two most commonly adopted regimens are medroxyprogesterone acetate at 500–600 mg daily and megestrol acetate at 160 mg daily for a minimum of 6–9 months, with initial response rates commonly reported between 60% and 80% and recurrence rates between 25% and 40%. Photodynamic therapy and hysteroscopic EC excision have recently been reported as alternative approaches to progestin therapy alone. However, limited efficacy and safety data exist. Live birth rates after progestin therapy have typically been reported around 30%; however, when focusing only on those who do pursue fertility after successful treatment, the live birth rates were found to be higher than 60%. Assisted reproductive technology has been associated with a higher live birth rate compared with spontaneous conception, most likely reflecting the presence of infertility at baseline. Close follow-up is of paramount importance, and definitive treatment after completion of childbearing is advised.