Catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: ten-year trends in utilization, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality in the United States

Clinical radiation audits as a tool for the optimization of radiation exposure in cardiac electrophysiology procedures

BACKGROUND

Clinical radiation audits are useful to reduce ionizing radiation in clinical practice. The first Swiss radiation audit in Cardiology took place at the University Heart Center Zurich in 2019.

OBJECTIVES

To compare local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to the currently available national DRLs and to examine patient radiation exposure before and after the clinical radiation audit.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 775 patients undergoing EP procedures from 2018- 2020. Main recommendations of the clinical audit were the regular use of collimation, semitransparent filters, the reduction of cine images and frame rates. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated with cumulative doses, fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were acute procedural success rates and 30-day complications.

RESULTS

447 (57.5%) patients prior to, and 328 (42.3%) after the audit were included. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 14.1%, PVI radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 26.8%, RF ablation of right-sided supraventricular tachycardia in 32.1%, other procedures in 27% of cases. Local DRLs for the DAP were below national DRLs (1 Gy cm2 vs 150 Gy cm2 for AVNRT/AVRT ablation). After the audit, there was a significant radiation reduction for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation (cumulative dose: 4.8 mGy vs 2.1 mGy and fluoroscopy times: 210 seconds vs 107 seconds, p < 0.001) and PVI with RF (50.4 mGy vs 29.5 mGy, and 378 seconds vs 191 seconds, p < 0.003; respectively). No significant differences were found in acute procedural success rates or 30-day complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical radiation audit was associated with a significant reduction of patient radiation exposure for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation and PVI with RF.

Left Ventricular Entry to Reduce Brain Lesions During Catheter Ablation: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, one of the most rapidly growing procedures in cardiac electrophysiology, is associated with magnetic resonance imaging-detected brain lesions in more than half of cases. Although a retrograde aortic approach is conventional, modern tools enable entry through a transseptal approach that may avoid embolization of debris from the arterial system. We sought to test the hypothesis that a transseptal puncture would mitigate brain injury compared with a retrograde aortic approach.

METHODS

The TRAVERSE trial (Transseptal Versus Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli) was a multicenter randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Patients with left ventricular arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation procedures were randomly assigned to a transseptal puncture approach compared (1:1) with a retrograde aortic approach. The primary outcome was the presence of an acute brain lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included clinically manifest complications, procedural efficacy, and 6-month neurocognitive assessments.

RESULTS

Among the 62 patients randomly assigned to a retrograde aortic approach with postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging, 28 (45%) exhibited an acute brain lesion compared with 19 of the 69 (28%) of those randomized to a transseptal puncture (P=0.036). No differences in clinically manifest complications or procedural efficacy were observed. More patients in the retrograde aortic arm were categorized as having a high likelihood of cognitive impairment at 6 months (33% compared with 19% of those in the transseptal arm), but substantial loss to follow-up was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing left ventricular catheter ablation procedures, a transseptal approach reduced the risk of acute brain lesions by nearly half compared with a retrograde aortic approach without sacrificing safety or efficacy. Given a likely embolic pathogenesis, the brain magnetic resonance imaging findings may reflect a propensity to other organ damage; these findings may extend to other procedures requiring left ventricular entry.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03946072.

Mortality and readmissions after ventricular tachycardia ablation: An analysis of inpatient and outpatient state databases

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is an effective therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and is increasing in use. Assessment of contemporary real-world outcomes of VT ablation requires data inclusive of both inpatient and outpatient encounters.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess factors associated with 1-year in-hospital mortality, all-cause readmission, and recurrent readmission for VT after VT ablation along with the associated costs of care.

METHODS

Inpatient and outpatient VT ablations were captured in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data in Florida, Maryland, and New York from 2016 to 2020 with 1-year follow-up through 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors associated with 1-year in-hospital mortality, all-cause readmission, and recurrent VT readmission. Costs of inpatient cases and readmission were captured.

RESULTS

Of 3899 patients undergoing VT ablation, 2% died during the initial episode of care. The 1-year in-hospital mortality rate, all-cause readmission rate, and recurrent VT readmission rate were 6.8%, 43.4%, and 16.9%, respectively, and were broadly stable during the study period. Coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and all-cause readmission within 1 year (P < .05). Recurrent VT was the most common cause of readmission. All-cause readmissions increased costs by 55%.

CONCLUSION

Mortality, long-term readmission, and recurrent VT remain high after VT ablation and include measurably important costs. Strategies to improve freedom from recurrent VT while managing comorbid conditions may serve as targets for improving the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an important procedure applied to a vulnerable population.

Safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a viable treatment option for selected patients. However, its safety profile in liver cirrhosis (LC) populations remains underexplored.

METHODS

This was an observational analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database 2016-2020; we analyzed adult encounters undergoing CA for atrial fibrillation who had a concomitant diagnosis of LC. Using propensity scores, encounters were divided into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of LC and matched in a 1:1 fashion using LC as the dependent variable. In-hospital mortality and postprocedure total complications were compared using regression models.

RESULTS

93 830 procedures were identified for non-LC patients and 960 involving LC patients; after propensity score matching, each cohort included 910 hospitalizations. The mean age in the LC-matched cohort was 66.5 ± 9.1 years. In-hospital mortality did not differ between the groups (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.06-16.1]; p = .99). However, the LC cohort exhibited higher odds of total complications (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI [1.42-2.75]; p < .001). Length of stay (LOS) was comparable, but total costs were higher in the LC cohort: LOS was 2 days (95% CI [1-3]) in the LC group versus 3 days (95% CI [1-4]) (p < .11) and LC: $202,000 (95% CI [$142 000-$261 000]) versus non-LC: $189 000, (95% CI [$153 000-$222 000]) (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this national analysis of patients undergoing CA for AF, those with LC had similar in-hospital mortality, postprocedure complications, and LOS compared to noncirrhotic patients. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are needed to assess the safety profile of CA in this subpopulation.

Determining the recurrence rate of premature ventricular complexes and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia after radiofrequency catheter ablation with the help of designing a machine-learning model

Ventricular arrhythmias increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recurrent PVCs and IVT are generally considered benign in the absence of structural heart abnormalities. Artificial intelligence is a rapidly growing field. In recent years, medical professionals have shown great interest in the potential use of ML, an integral part of AI, in various disciplines, including diagnostic applications, decision-making, prognostic stratification, and solving complex pathophysiological aspects of diseases from these data at extraordinary complexity, scale, and acquisition rate. The aim of this study was to design an ML model to predict the probability of PVC and IVT recurrence after RF ablation. Data of patients were collected and manipulated using traditional analysis and various artificial intelligence models, namely MLP, Gradient Boosting Machines, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression. Hypertension, male sex, and the use of non-irrigate catheters were associated with less freedom from arrhythmia. All these results were obtained through traditional analytic methods, and according to AI, none of the variables had a clear effect on the recurrence of arrhythmia. Each AI model presents unique strengths and weaknesses, and further optimization and fine-tuning of these models are necessary to increase their clinical utility. By expanding the dataset, improved predictions can be fostered to ultimately increase the clinical utility of AI in predicting PVC erosion outcomes.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Electrical storm after acute myocardial infarction treated with radiofrequency ablation under the Escort of ICD

The occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with poor prognosis. Drug therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are effective methods to prevent sudden death. Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation can map the matrix and mechanism of VT, thereby effectively reducing the occurrence of ICD discharge. This paper reports on the case of a middle-aged man who underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI and developed VT and ventricular fibrillation on day 7 after reperfusion. An ICD was implanted. On day 19, he received catheter ablation because of refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and frequent discharge of the ICD. After three months, the patient had not experienced any further ventricular tachycardia attacks. The conclusion is that RF catheter ablation can resolve the ES after myocardial infarction and significantly reduce the occurrence of ICD discharges.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation in the Presence of Intra-Cardiac Thrombus

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation in the presence of intracardiac thrombi was evaluated in very few studies.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate in-hospital outcomes of VT ablation in the presence of an intracardiac thrombus, in a large inpatient US registry.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent non-elective VT catheter ablations in the United States between 2016 and 2019 were identified using ICD-10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures, and outcomes as well as in-hospital mortality were collected. In-hospital outcomes were compared using propensity score (PS) matching analysis with a 1:3 ratio between patients with and without intracardiac thrombus.

RESULTS

A weighted total of 15,725 admissions for non-elective VT ablation were included in the study, of which 190 (1.2%) had a discharge diagnosis of intracardiac thrombus. Patients with intracardiac thrombus had a higher comorbidity burden and were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy and a diagnosis of cardiac aneurysm. In PS analysis, the presence of intracardiac thrombus was significantly associated with higher rates of any in-hospital complications (42.1% vs. 19.3%, p < 0.009), driven by higher periprocedural cerebrovascular accident and vascular injury events. In-hospital mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing non-elective VT ablation, intracardiac thrombus was associated with higher rates of in-hospital complications, but not higher in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest that intracardiac thrombus should not contraindicate VT ablation when deemed necessary, while efforts should be made to decrease potential complications.

Sex, Race, and Rural-Urban Disparities in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablations

BACKGROUND

Ventricular ablation may be clinically indicated for patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and has been shown to decrease risk of recurrence and overall morbidity. However, the existence of disparities among patients receiving ventricular ablation has not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors examined patients hospitalized with VT to determine whether disparities exist among those receiving ablations.

METHODS

The authors used the National Inpatient Sample to assess patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of VT in 2019 who did and did not receive catheter ablations. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate risk factors for VT ablation based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

After adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, female and Black patients hospitalized with VT had significantly lower odds of receiving ablations compared with male and White patients (OR: 0.835; 95% CI: 0.699-0.997; P = 0.047; and OR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.457-0.832; P = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, patients at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive ablations compared with those at urban, teaching hospitals. No significant differences were noted based on income or insurance status in the adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors identified significant disparities in the delivery of ventricular ablations among patients hospitalized with VT. Overall, patients who were female or Black as well as those who were hospitalized at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive VT ablations during hospitalization.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Safety and efficacy of same-day discharge for premature ventricular complex ablations

AIMS

Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are generally observed overnight in the hospital given the concern for complications. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) of patients undergoing elective CA of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing elective VA ablation at Ascension St Vincent Hospital from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 was undertaken. Of those, the patients undergoing PVC ablation were divided into SDD and non-SDD. Patients underwent SDD at the discretion of the operator. The primary safety outcome was the 30-day incidence of complications and death. The primary efficacy outcome was procedural success. Among 188 patients who underwent VA ablation, 98 (52.1%) were PVC ablations, and of those, 55 (56.1%) were SDD. There was no difference in age, gender, comorbidities, or ejection fraction between the two groups. Patients that were non-SDD were more likely to be on chronic anticoagulation (P = 0.03), have ablation in the LV (P = 0.04), have retrograde access (P = 0.03), and receive heparin during the procedure (P = 0.01). There were no complications in the SDD group compared with one (2.3%) in the non-SDD group. There was no difference in primary efficacy between the two groups with a 90.9% acute success in the SDD and 88.4% in the non-SDD (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge for CA of PVCs is feasible and could lower healthcare resource utilization without compromising outcomes in this unique population.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Gender and race-related disparities in the management of ventricular arrhythmias

Modern studies have revealed gender and race-related disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias, but few studies have focused on outcomes for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The aim of this article is to review relevant studies and identify outcome differences in the management of VA among Black and female patients. We found that female patients typically present younger for VA, are more likely to have recurrent VA after catheter ablation, are less likely to be prescribed antiarrhythmic medication, and are less likely to receive primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients. Additionally, female patients appear to derive similar overall mortality benefit from primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients, but they may have an increased risk of acute post-procedural complications. We also found that Black patients presenting with VA are less likely to undergo catheter ablation, receive appropriate primary prevention ICD placement, and have significantly higher risk-adjusted 1-year mortality rates after hospital discharge as compared to White patients. Black female patients appear to have the worst outcomes out of any demographic subgroup.

Real World Data from Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardias and Premature Ventricular Complexes in a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Catheter ablation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), such as ventricular tachycardias (VT) or frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVC), is increasingly considered an effective and safe therapy when performed in experienced centers. This study sought to determine acute success rates and complication rates of ablation procedures for patients with VA in a Swiss tertiary care center. Methods: All patients who underwent ablation therapy for VT and PVC at the University Heart Center in Zurich, Switzerland, between March 2012 and April 2017 were included in this analysis. Results: A total of 120 patients underwent catheter ablation for VT and PVC (69 and 51, respectively). Seventy percent of patients were male, and the mean age was 55.3 years. The most common indication for ablation was high PVC burden (47.5%), followed by paroxysmal VT (38.3%), ICD shocks (23.3%), incessant VT (12.5%), electrical storm (7.5%), and syncope (3.3%). Acute success rates for VT and PVC ablations were 94.2% and 92.2%, respectively. Rates for complications (including major and minor) for VT and PVC were 10.1% and 7.8%, respectively. Complications occurred only in patients with structural heart disease; no complications were noted in structurally normal hearts. Conclusions: Our results suggest that catheter ablation for VT and PVC has high acute success rates with a reasonable risk for complications in the setting of tertiary care centers, comparable to those reported in other studies.

Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia

Background

The real-world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well-established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18-64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT.

Method

Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non-elderly (18-64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in-hospital procedural outcome and 30-day readmission between these two groups.

Results

Our study included 2075 (49.1%) non-elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post-procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non-home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30-day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86-30.31, p = .01), non-home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93-3.00, p < .01) and 30-day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32-1.89, p < .01).

Conclusion

Elderly patients have worse in-hospital outcome, early mortality, non-home discharge, and 30-day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non-elderly groups in the procedural complications.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: individual case analysis of 43 031 procedures

AIMS

In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%.

CONCLUSION

Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005-20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data.

Using real-world data from health systems to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a catheter to treat ischemic ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The ThermoCool STSF catheter is used for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in routine clinical practice, although outcomes have not been studied and the catheter does not have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. We used real-world health system data to evaluate its safety and effectiveness for this indication.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing ischemic VT ablation with the ThermoCool STSF catheter pooled across two health systems (Mercy Health and Mayo Clinic), the primary safety composite outcome of death, thromboembolic events, and procedural complications within 7 days was compared to a performance goal of 15%, which is twice the expected proportion of the primary composite safety outcome based on prior studies. The exploratory effectiveness outcome of rehospitalization for VT or heart failure or repeat VT ablation at up to 1 year was averaged across health systems among patients treated with the ThermoCool STSF vs. ST catheters.

RESULTS

Seventy total patients received ablation for ischemic VT using the ThermoCool STSF catheter. The primary safety composite outcome occurred in 3/70 (4.3%; 90% CI, 1.2-10.7%) patients, meeting the pre-specified performance goal, p = 0.0045. At 1 year, the effectiveness outcome risk difference (STSF-ST) at Mercy was - 0.4% (90% CI: - 25.2%, 24.3%) and at Mayo Clinic was 12.6% (90% CI: - 13.0%, 38.4%); the average risk difference across both institutions was 5.8% (90% CI: - 12.0, 23.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The ThermoCool STSF catheter was safe and appeared effective for ischemic VT ablation, supporting continued use of the catheter and informing possible FDA label expansion. Health system data hold promise for real-world safety and effectiveness evaluation of cardiovascular devices.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as first-line therapy for the management of ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) in line with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in VT management; however, it is unknown if CA should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this study is to verify the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy for the first VT presentation (as adjunctive to ICD insertion), compared to initial ICD insertion and anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy.

METHODS

Data from patients with the first presentation for VT from January 2017 to January 2021 was reviewed. Patients were classified as "ablation first" vs "ICD first" groups and compared the clinical outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients presented with VT; 34 underwent CA as first-line therapy prior to ICD insertion, and 150 had ICD insertion/AAD therapy as first-line. During the median follow-up of 625 days, patients who underwent CA as first-line therapy had significantly higher ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (91% vs 59%, log-rank P = 0.002) and composite of VA recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, transplant, and death (84% vs 54%, log-rank P = 0.01) compared to those who did not undergo CA. Multivariate analysis revealed that first-line CA was the only protective predictor of VA recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.20, P = 0.003). There were 3 (9%) peri-procedural complications with no peri-procedural deaths.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data supports the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy at the time of the first VT hospitalization, compared to the initial ICD implant and AAD therapy.

Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection into Healed Myocardial Infarction Scar Border Zone on the Risk of Ventricular Tachycardia

The scar border zone is a main source of reentry responsible for ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT). We evaluated the effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection into the scar border zone on arrhythmic risks in a post-myocardial infarction (MI) animal model. Rabbit MI models were generated by left descending coronary artery ligation. Surviving rabbits after 4 weeks underwent left thoracotomy and autologous MSCs or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was administered to scar border zones in two rabbits in each group. Another rabbit without MI underwent a sham procedure (control). An implantable loop recorder (ILR) was implanted in the left chest wall in all animals. Four weeks after cell injections, ventricular fibrillation was induced in 1/2 rabbit in the PBS group by electrophysiologic study, and no ventricular arrhythmia was induced in the MSC group or control. Spontaneous VT was not detected during ILR analysis in any animal for 4 weeks. Histologic examination showed restoration of connexin 43 (Cx43) expression in the MSC group, which was higher than in the PBS group and comparable to the control. In conclusion, MSC injections into the MI scar border zone did not increase the risk of VT and were associated with favorable Cx43 expression and arrangement.

Long-Term Results of the First Clinical Application of Stereotactic Radioablation Using a Linear Electron Accelerator for the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia

We present the first clinical application of non-invasive stereotaxic radioablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical and surgical treatment. Based on the results of invasive navigational activation mapping, a pericicatrical zone in the interventricular septum associated with VT was verified. Radiosurgical irradiation of the target in the region of the interventricular septum and the posterior apical segment of the left ventricle was performed on a TrueBeam linear electron accelerator (Varian) in accordance with the segmental scheme of the left ventricle. Irradiation doses for 95% of the internal target volume (ITV, 17 cm³) and planned target volume (PTV, 46 cm³) (31.2 and 25 Gy, respectively) were delivered by two full coplanar arches in 1 session. Irradiation was performed during expiration using a respiratory control system. The loading dose to critical structures was within tolerance. The planned follow-up period is 6 months. According to remote monitoring, the intensity of VT paroxysms over 48 days after treatment was from daily to 2-3 per day. Then, the incidence of VT paroxysms decreased (1-3 per week), and from the 64th to the 185th day (the end of the observation period), no VT paroxysms were recorded, which suggests that the impact was highly precise, conformal, and involved the total wall thickness. No undesirable effects and damage to adjacent organs were observed.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Insights from the national readmission database

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT), albeit the decision to undergo this procedure is often influenced by underlying comorbidities. The present study aims at evaluating the effects of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes of VT ablation.

METHODS

We identified 7212 patients who presented between 2016 and 2018 and underwent catheter ablation for VT. Their clinical data were retrospectively accrued from the national readmission database (NRD) using the corresponding diagnosis codes. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD group) and patients without. Odds ratios (OR) for the primary and secondary outcomes were calculated, and multivariable regression analysis was utilized to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Compared with patients without CKD, patients in CKD group were older (mean age 67.9 vs. 60.5 years, P < 0.01), had a longer mean length of stay (8.73 vs. 5.69 days, P < 0.01), and higher in-hospital mortality 113 (6.7%) vs. 119 (2.2%) (OR 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.29-3.88), P < 0.01). CKD group patients had increased risk of developing acute kidney injury 726 (43%) vs. 623 (11.3%) (3.69 95% CI (2.87-4.74), P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with CKD, VT ablation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, mean length of stay, and total hospital charge. This significantly influences the decision-making prior to performing this procedure.

Non-invasive localization of post-infarct ventricular tachycardia exit sites to guide ablation planning: a computational deep learning platform utilizing the 12-lead electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrograms from implanted devices

AIMS

Existing strategies that identify post-infarct ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation target either employ invasive electrophysiological (EP) mapping or non-invasive modalities utilizing the electrocardiogram (ECG). Their success relies on localizing sites critical to the maintenance of the clinical arrhythmia, not always recorded on the 12-lead ECG. Targeting the clinical VT by utilizing electrograms (EGM) recordings stored in implanted devices may aid ablation planning, enhancing safety and speed and potentially reducing the need of VT induction. In this context, we aim to develop a non-invasive computational-deep learning (DL) platform to localize VT exit sites from surface ECGs and implanted device intracardiac EGMs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A library of ECGs and EGMs from simulated paced beats and representative post-infarct VTs was generated across five torso models. Traces were used to train DL algorithms to localize VT sites of earliest systolic activation; first tested on simulated data and then on a clinically induced VT to show applicability of our platform in clinical settings. Localization performance was estimated via localization errors (LEs) against known VT exit sites from simulations or clinical ablation targets. Surface ECGs successfully localized post-infarct VTs from simulated data with mean LE = 9.61 ± 2.61 mm across torsos. VT localization was successfully achieved from implanted device intracardiac EGMs with mean LE = 13.10 ± 2.36 mm. Finally, the clinically induced VT localization was in agreement with the clinical ablation volume.

CONCLUSION

The proposed framework may be utilized for direct localization of post-infarct VTs from surface ECGs and/or implanted device EGMs, or in conjunction with efficient, patient-specific modelling, enhancing safety and speed of ablation planning.

The Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation in the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia in Comparison With Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart diseases. Two independent investigators searched electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) using keyword combinations (Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free terms) such as "catheter ablation," "ventricular tachycardia," "escalation," and "antiarrhythmic drugs" from inception to November 30, 2022. The primary efficacy outcomes included recurrence of VT at follow-up, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. The secondary efficacy outcomes assessed in the current meta-analysis included implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock and hospitalization due to cardiac reasons. Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. A total of three studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence of VT (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.72-1.24, p-value: 0.67), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.46, p-value: 0.98), cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio (RR): 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-1.45, p-value: 0.67), incidence of ICD shocks (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76-1.29, p-value: 0.93, I-square: 0%), and hospitalization due to cardiac reasons in follow-up (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.07, p-value: 0.12) between the catheter ablation group and the antiarrhythmic drug group. However, the risk of treatment-related adverse events was lower in the ablation group compared to the antiarrhythmic medicine (AAM) group (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.67, p-value: 0.0001). In this meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with structural heart disease who had ventricular tachycardia, the incidence of the recurrence of VT, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and ICD shock was not significantly different between patients who received catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs. However, regarding safety, catheter ablation is a safe procedure with a low risk of treatment-related events compared to antiarrhythmic drugs.

Sex and racial disparities in catheter ablation

Sex and racial disparities in the presentation, diagnosis, and management of cardiac arrhythmias are recognized. Sex-specific differences in electrophysiological parameters are well known and are predominantly related to differences in ion channel expression and the influence of sex hormones. However, the relationship between hormonal or racial influence and arrhythmia mechanisms, presentation, and management needs to be better defined. Women and racial and ethnic groups are less likely to undergo catheter ablation procedures for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Underrepresentation of women and racial/ethnic groups in clinical trials has resulted in significant knowledge gaps. Whether sex and racial disparities in arrhythmia management reflect barriers in access to care, physician bias, patient values, and preferences or other factors requires further study.

Best Practices for the Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Techniques for catheter ablation have evolved to effectively treat a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Pre-operative electrocardiographic and cardiac imaging data are very useful in understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate and can guide mapping and ablation. In this review, we focus on best practices for catheter ablation, with emphasis on tailoring ablation strategies, based on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, underlying clinical status, and hemodynamic stability of the ventricular arrhythmia. We discuss steps to make ablation safe and prevent complications, and techniques to improve the efficacy of ablation, including optimal use of electroanatomical mapping algorithms, energy delivery, intracardiac echocardiography, and selective use of mechanical circulatory support.

Outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with sarcoidosis: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2018)

INTRODUCTION

Data on utilization, major complications, and in-hospital mortality of catheter ablation (CA) for sarcoidosis-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are limited. We sought to determine the outcomes of sarcoidosis-related VT, and incidence and predictors of complications associated with the CA procedure.

METHODS

We queried the 2002-2018 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients aged ≥18 years with sarcoidosis admitted with VT. A 1:3 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare patient outcomes between CA and medically managed groups. Multivariable regression was performed to determine independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications associated with the CA procedure.

RESULTS

Of 3220 sarcoidosis patients with VT, 132 (4.1%) underwent CA. Patients who underwent CA were younger, male predominant, more likely Caucasian, had differences in baseline comorbidities including more likely to have heart failure, less likely to have prior myocardial infarction, COPD, or severe renal disease, had a higher mean household income, and more likely admitted to a larger/urban teaching hospital. After PSM, we examined 106 CA cases and 318 medically managed cases. There was a trend toward a lower in-hospital mortality rate in the CA group when compared to the medically managed group (1.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.08). The most common complications were pericardial drainage (5.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (3.8%), accidental puncture periprocedure (3.0%), and cardiac tamponade (2.3%). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications among the CA group included congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-104.2) and mild to moderate renal disease (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1-13.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sarcoidosis-related VT who received medical therapy alone, those who underwent CA have a trend for a lower mortality rate despite procedure-related complications occurring as high as 9.1%. Additional studies are recommended to better evaluate the benefits and risks of VT ablation in this group.

Comparative effectiveness of ventricular tachycardia ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy by location of myocardial infarction: a sub-study of the VANISH trial

AIMS

Complexity of the ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate and the size and thickness of infarction area border zones differ based on location of myocardial infarctions (MIs). These differences may translate into heterogeneity in the effectiveness of treatments. This study aims to examine the influence of infarct location on the effectiveness of VT ablation in comparison with escalated pharmacological therapy in patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

VANISH trial participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of an inferior MI scar. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox models were calculated for each subgroup. Of 259 randomized patients (median age 69.8 years, 7.0% women), 135 had an inferior MI and 124 had a non-inferior MI. Among patients with an inferior MI, no statistically significant difference in the composite primary outcome of all-cause mortality, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, and VT storm was detected between treatment arms [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.20]. In contrast, patients with non-inferior MIs had a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of the primary outcome with ablation (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86). In a sensitivity analysis of anterior MI patients (n = 83), a trend towards a reduction in the primary outcome with ablation was detected (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09).

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of VT ablation versus escalated AADs varies based on the location of the MI. Patients with MI scars located only in non-inferior regions of the ventricles derive greater benefit from VT ablation in comparison to escalation of AADs in reducing VT-related events.

Repolarization Heterogeneity in Human Post-Infarct Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Slow conduction, caused by fibrosis between surviving myocytes and connexin remodeling, is an important prerequisite for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (VT); however, slow conduction is present throughout the infarct whereas VT circuits are finite in number and discrete. In a porcine model of VT, re-entrant circuits occur at region of significant repolarization heterogeneity caused by up-regulation of potassium channel β-subunits KCNE3 (increasing repolarization current) and KCNE4 (decreasing repolarization current), causing heterogeneous action potential durations.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine whether re-entrant circuits in human post-infarction VT are associated with repolarization heterogeneity.

METHODS

In 6 patients, left ventricular mapping was performed during induced VT to identify sites within the VT circuit. Subsequently, unipolar mapping (3.5-mm tip ablation catheter) was performed to characterize activation-recovery intervals (ARIs), which are surrogates for local action potential durations, at sites documented within the VT circuit isthmus (IN) compared to sites within the infarct scar but outside of the VT circuit (OUT).

RESULTS

ARIs were significantly shorter in the IN compared with the OUT sites (420.2 ± 79.3 ms vs 462 ± 52.8 ms; P = 0.01). In all patients. sites that were associated with the circuit always had shorter ARI values than did those sampled from OUT regions.

CONCLUSIONS

VT circuit sites in human post-infarct VT are associated with repolarization heterogeneity, similar to what was previously reported in a porcine model. This suggests the possibility of a common mechanism between humans and the porcine model of post-infarct VT, and that development of ablation strategies or small molecule or genetic therapies to restore normal repolarization kinetics may be antiarrhythmic.

Near zero vascular complications using echo-guided puncture during catheter ablation of arrhythmias: A retrospective study and literature review

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) is routinely used for the treatment of arrhythmias. Vascular complications are the most common complications during these procedures. Previous data reported that ultrasound (US)-guided puncture is a useful method to avoid vascular complications. We reported our experience using US-guided puncture in patients undergoing CA for arrhythmias.

METHODS

A total of 273 patients (mean age 57 ± 17 years; 58% male) were referred to our center for CA of arrhythmias from January 2016 to December 2019. All procedures were performed by expert operators, and US-guided vascular access was performed on all patients. Doppler sonography was performed the day after the procedure on all patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (31%) underwent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation, 49 patients (18%) atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia ablation, 14 patients (5%) atrial tachycardia ablation, 25 patients (9%) atrial flutter ablation, 63 patients (23%) atrial fibrillation ablation, and 38 patients (14%) ventricular tachycardia ablation. Vascular pseudo-aneurysms and arteriovenous fistula were defined as major complications; furthermore, venous thrombosis and inguinal hematomas were as defined minor complications. The percentage of major vascular complications was 0.3% (1 arteriovenous fistula) and the percentage of minor vascular complications was 0.3% (1 venous thrombosis).

DISCUSSION

Ultrasound-guided vascular puncture in patients undergoing CA is useful to improve procedural success and reduce complications.

[Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease]

Ventricular cardiac rhythm disorders are potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease carries an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Interventional radiofrequency catheter ablation is increasingly becoming the focus of treatment for ventricular arrhythmias. So far, no randomized study has been able to demonstrate a reduction in mortality; however, depending on the existing cardiomyopathy, interventional VT ablation has proven to be more effective for rhythm stabilization than antiarrhythmic therapy and is subsequently associated with improve quality of life through reduced implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment. The aim of this work is to discuss the pathophysiology, mechanism and treatment of VT with structural heart disease in order to define the role of catheter ablation.

[History of development of ventricular arrhythmias diagnostics]

This review shows historical steps in the development of topical diagnostics for ventricular arrhythmias, the current status of this issue, and the relevance of developing topical, noninvasive electrophysiological cardiac mapping.

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium

Worldwide, ∼4 million people die from sudden cardiac death every year caused in more than half of the cases by ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction by implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most common, even though not curative, therapy to date. Optimized ICD programming should be strived for in order to decrease the incidence of ICD interventions. Catheter ablation reduces the recurrence of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) and is an important adjunct to sole ICD-based treatment or pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ICM, as conclusively demonstrated by seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the last two decades. However, none of the conducted trials was powered to reveal a survival benefit for ablated patients as compared to controls. Whereas thorough consideration of an early approach is necessary following two recent RCTs (PAUSE-SCD, BERLIN VT), catheter ablation is particularly recommended in patients with recurrent VT after ICD therapy. In this context, novel, pathophysiologically driven ablation strategies referring to deep morphological and functional substrate phenotyping based on high-resolution mapping and three-dimensional visualization of scars appear promising. Emerging concepts like sympathetic cardiac denervation as well as radioablation might expand the therapeutical armamentarium especially in patients with therapy-refractory VT. Randomized controlled trials are warranted and on the way to investigate how these translate into improved patient outcome. This review summarizes therapeutic strategies currently available for the prevention of VT recurrences, the optimal timing of applicability, and highlights future perspectives after a PAUSE in BERLIN.

Cardiac stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: A radical alternative? A narrative review of rationale and cardiological aspects

Ventricular arrhythmias are serious life-threatening cardiac disorders. Despite many technological improvements, a non-negligible number of patients present refractory ventricular tachycardias, resistant to a catheter ablation procedure, placing these patients in a therapeutic impasse. Recently, a cardiac stereotactic radioablative technique has been developed to treat patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as a bail out strategy. This new therapeutic option historically brings together two fields of expertise unknown to each other, pointing out the necessity of an optimal partnership between cardiologists and radiation oncologists. As described in this narrative review, the understanding of cardiological aspects of the technique for radiation oncologists and treatment technical aspects comprehension for cardiologists represent a major challenge for the application and the future development of this promising treatment.

SafeTy and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulant versus Aspirin for Reduction Of RisK of CErebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation (STROKE-VT)

BACKGROUND

The STROKE-VT is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that studied the differences in cerebrovascular events (CVE) between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) vs. ASA use post-procedurally in patients undergoing left ventricular arrhythmia (LVA) ablation [ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contraction (PVC)] using radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

246 patients scheduled for LVA-RFA were randomized 1:1 post-procedurally to receive DOAC or ASA. The study's primary endpoint was the incidence of stroke or TIA, or MRI detected asymptomatic cerebrovascular events (ACE) at 24 hours and 30 days follow-up. The secondary endpoints included procedure-related complications (composite of any vascular complication, pericardial complication, heart block, thromboembolic event excluding stroke or TIA) and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups regarding baseline and ablation characteristics (except the percentage of patients undergoing VT ablation, rate of amiodarone use, and total RFA time). Post-procedure cerebrovascular events (stroke and TIA) were lower in the DOAC arm versus ASA arm (0% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001 and 4.9% vs. 18%, p < 0.001; respectively). Patients in the ASA group had higher MRI detected ACE compared to the DOAC group both at 24 hours (23% vs. 12%, p = 0.03) and 30 days (18% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.006) follow-up. The acute procedure-related complication and in-hospital mortality were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

DOAC utilization following endocardial/epicardial ablation for LVA-RFA was associated with reduced risk of transient ischemic attack or stroke, and asymptomatic MRI-detected cerebrovascular event.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Recent trends in cardiac electrophysiology and catheter ablation in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation has rapidly become an integral part of the management of many arrhythmias.

AIMS

To provide a history of clinical cardiac electrophysiology (EP) in New Zealand (NZ) and analysis of recent trends in EP procedures and catheter ablations across NZ, which has not previously been reported.

METHODS

EP case type and volume were obtained from the EP databases from each of the four public and four private EP centres in NZ from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018. Procedure rates were expressed as per million population.

RESULTS

A total of 7695 EP cases was performed, including 5929 (77%) in the public sector. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was the most common procedure at 29%. EP procedure rates increased by 21% (to 353 per million in 2018), predominantly due to AF ablation rates increasing by 46%. Ventricular tachycardia ablation rates increased by 41% but only comprised 8% of procedures. There was a striking difference in the growth of EP procedure rates in the public compared to the private sector (4% vs 106%), as well as considerable differences in EP procedure and AF ablation rates across the public EP centres. NZ had lower ablation rates compared to countries with similar healthcare expenditure.

CONCLUSION

There has been a substantial increase in EP procedure and AF ablation rates in NZ and international trends suggest this growth will continue. However, there is considerable variation in procedure rates and growth trends between EP centres, highlighting inequities in access within the country.

Clinical Evidence behind Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia (STAR)-A Comprehensive Review

The electrophysiology-guided noninvasive cardiac radioablation, also known as STAR (stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation) is an emerging treatment method for persistent ventricular tachycardia. Since its first application in 2012 in Stanford Cancer Institute, and a year later in University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic, the authors from all around the world have published case reports and case series, and several prospective trials were established. In this article, we would like to discuss the available clinical evidence, analyze the potentially clinically relevant differences in methodology, and address some of the unique challenges that come with this treatment method.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ultrasound guidance for femoral venous access in electrophysiology procedures-systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The most common complications of electrophysiology (EP) procedures are related to vascular access. Our study aims to conduct a meta-analysis comparing ultrasound (US)-guided vs. palpation-based technique for femoral venous access in EP procedures.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing femoral vein puncture with/without US in EP procedures. The primary outcome was the rate of major vascular complications; secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time. Predefined subgroup analysis was conducted separately for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure (PVI). A random-effects model was used to derive risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 8232 patients met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the standard technique, the use of US reduced major vascular complications (from 2.01 to 0.71%, p < 0.0001). The rate of minor vascular complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14-0.62, p = 0.001) and inadvertent artery puncture were lower with US-guided puncture (RR = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17-0.58, p = 0.0003). Puncture time was shorter (mean difference = - 92.1 s, 95% CI, - 142.12 - - 42.07 s, p = 0.0003) and postprocedural groin pain was less frequent (RR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41-0.79, p = 0.0008) in the US group. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing PVI also showed significant reduction of major vascular complications (RR = 0.27, 95% CI, 0.12-0.64, p = 0.003) and inadvertent artery puncture (RR = 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21-0.59, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Real-time US-guidance of femoral vein puncture in EP procedures is beneficial: it reduces major and minor vascular complications, inadvertent artery puncture, postprocedural groin pain, and puncture time.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Real-world characteristics and readmissions among patients undergoing ablation for ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective database analysis of commercially insured patients in the USA

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is an effective treatment to alleviate symptoms and reduce recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) shocks in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the characteristics and outcomes (complications, inpatient readmissions) of commercially insured patients in the USA undergoing ablation for ischaemic or non-ischaemic VT.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-64 years with a primary diagnosis of VT who underwent ablation between 2006 and 2015 were identified using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. The rate of complications including vascular complications, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism and pericardial tamponade over a 30-day post-ablation period (including index admission) was examined. Inpatient readmissions (VT-related, heart failure (HF)-related and non-VT arrhythmia-related) over the 12-month post-ablation period were examined. A Cox regression model was used to determine factors associated with inpatient readmissions.

RESULTS

5242 patients (488 with ischaemic and 4754 with non-ischaemic VT) met the study criteria. The majority of VT ablations occurred in an outpatient setting (57% for ischaemic and 66% for non-ischaemic VT). Among complications, vascular complications were most frequent (2.05% among ischaemic and 1.6% among non-ischaemic VT patients) over the 30-day post-ablation period. Among ischaemic VT patients, 17%, 7.6% and 4.7% had VT-related, HF-related and non-VT arrhythmia-related inpatient readmissions, respectively in the 12-month post-ablation period. For non-ischaemic VT patients, these numbers were 7.5%, 1.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Inpatient setting (vs outpatient), baseline ICD/CRT-D implantation, HF comorbidity and ≥2 prior hospitalisations were associated with a higher risk of post-ablation VT-related inpatient readmissions among ischaemic VT patients. Similar factors also were associated with a higher risk of post-ablation VT-related inpatient readmission among non-ischaemic VT patients.

CONCLUSION

Setting of ablation and comorbidity status were found to influence readmission rates. Complication and readmission rates following VT ablation were low indicating towards the favourable safety profile of VT ablation.

Patient characteristics, procedure details including catheter devices, and complications of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia: a nationwide observational study

Background

Nationwide data are insufficient with respect to the characteristics of patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, complications of VT ablation, and procedure details including catheter devices used during VT ablation. The present study was performed to describe the patient characteristics, procedure details including catheter devices, and in‐hospital complications of catheter ablation for VT using a national inpatient database.

Methods

We used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national Japanese inpatient database, to identify patients who underwent VT ablation from July 2010 to March 2017. We examined patients’ age, gender, baseline diseases, comorbid conditions, admission status, catheter devices and drugs used, and in‐hospital complications of VT ablation.

Results

We identified 10 641 patients (median age, 61 years) who underwent VT ablation. The most frequently observed background heart disease among patients with structural heart disease was ischemic cardiomyopathy. An irrigated ablation catheter was used in 73% of patients, a force‐sensing ablation catheter was used in 22%, and intracardiac echocardiography was used in 25%. The frequency of using these procedures continuously increased over time. Overall, the prevalence of in‐hospital complications was 3.5% (cardiac tamponade, 0.8%; stroke, 0.6%; critical bleeding, 1.9%; mechanical circulatory support, 0.9%; and in‐hospital death, 0.8%).

Conclusions

The results of this study show the clinical features of VT ablation in a real‐world clinical setting. The use of irrigated catheters, force‐sensing catheters, and intracardiac echocardiography increased over time. The prevalence of in‐hospital complications was 3.5%.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Guided Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the feasibility and potential benefit of performing ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation procedures guided by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived pixel signal intensity (PSI) maps.

BACKGROUND

CMR-aided VT ablation using PSI maps from late gadolinium enhancement-CMR (LGE-CMR), together with electroanatomical map (EAM) information, has been shown to improve outcomes of VT substrate ablation.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with scar-dependent monomorphic VT who underwent substrate ablation were included in the study. In the last 28 (33%) consecutive patients, the procedure was guided by CMR. Procedural data, as well as acute and follow-up outcomes, were compared between patients who underwent guided CMR and 2 control groups: 1) patients who had PSI maps were available but the EAM was acquired and used to select the ablation targets (CMR aided); and 2) patients with no CMR-derived PSI maps available (no CMR).

RESULTS

Mean procedure duration was lower in CMR-guided substrate ablation compared with CMR-aided and no CMR (107 ± 59 min vs. 203 ± 68 min and 227 ± 52 min; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). CMR-guided ablation required less fluoroscopy time than CMR-aided ablation and no CMR (10 ± 4 min vs. 23 ± 11 min and 20 ± 9 min, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons) and less radiofrequency time (15 ± 8 min vs. 20 ± 15 min and 26 ± 10 min; p = 0.16 and p < 0.001, respectively). After substrate ablation, VT inducibility was lower in CMR-guided ablation compared with CMR-aided ablation and no CMR (18% vs. 32% and 46%; p = 0.35 and p = 0.04, respectively), without significant differences in complications. After 12 months, VT recurrence was lower in those who underwent CMR-guided ablation compared with no CMR (log-rank: 0.019), with no differences with CMR-aided ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR-guided VT ablation is feasible and safe, significantly reduces the procedural, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency times, and is associated with a higher noninducibility rate and lower VT recurrence after substrate ablation.