Crystal structure of arrestin-3 reveals the basis of the difference in receptor binding between two non-visual subtypes

Isoprenaline shows unique kinase dependencies in stimulating β1AR-β-arrestin2 interaction compared to endogenous catecholamines

The β1-adrenergic receptor (β1AR) is an essential G protein-coupled receptor in the heart. Its dysregulation represents a hallmark of cardiac diseases. Studies have identified a unique mode of β-arrestin interaction, where β1AR briefly engages with β-arrestins before catalytically accumulating them at the plasma membrane (PM) independently of the receptor. Although receptor phosphorylation crucially impacts β-arrestins, the contributions of specific kinases vital in β1AR regulation remain unclear. Here, we employed G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) GRK2/3/5/6 knockout cells and the protein kinase A inhibitor H89 in bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assays to systematically assess GRKs and protein kinase A in direct β-arrestin2 recruitment to β1AR and β-arrestin2 translocation to the PM. Furthermore, we compared the effects of the synthetic agonist isoprenaline with the endogenous catecholamines: epinephrine and norepinephrine. We observed pronounced differences in their kinase dependencies to mediate β-arrestin2 translocation to the PM. Upon isoprenaline stimulation, GRKs strongly influenced β-arrestin2 translocation to the PM but had no effect on direct β-arrestin2 recruitment to β1AR. Additionally, in a GRK2-specific context, protein kinase A inhibition primarily reduced the efficacy of isoprenaline for β-arrestin2 translocation, whereas for GRK5, it decreased potency. Strikingly, these kinase-dependent effects were absent for epinephrine and norepinephrine, suggesting distinct underlying molecular mechanisms for β-arrestin2 accumulation at the PM. This observation could be explained by agonist-specific differences in receptor conformational rearrangements, as suggested by distinct changes in the NMR spectra of β1AR. Our findings highlight that synthetic and endogenous ligands induce distinct molecular mechanisms in β1AR regulation, emphasizing the need to consider these differences when translating molecular insights into physiological contexts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our findings reveal mechanistic differences in β1-adrenergic receptor-mediated catalytic activation of β-arrestin2 by synthetic and endogenous agonists, driven by distinct G protein-coupled receptor kinases and protein kinase A dependencies. Although β-arrestin2 translocation to the PM occurred to similar extents with isoprenaline, epinephrine, and norepinephrine, kinase involvement was crucial only upon Iso stimulation of β1-adrenergic receptor. By elucidating these ligand-specific pathways, this study advances our understanding of β1-adrenergic receptor signaling and regulation while additionally highlighting the importance of considering these differences when translating molecular insights into pathophysiological contexts.

β-Arrestin Condensates Regulate G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of receptors in the genome and control many signaling cascades essential for survival. GPCR signaling is regulated by β-arrestins, multifunctional adapter proteins that direct receptor desensitization, internalization, and signaling. While at many GPCRs, β-arrestins interact with a wide array of signaling effectors, it is unclear how β-arrestins promote such varied functions. Here we show that β-arrestins undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) to form condensates that regulate GPCR function. We demonstrate that β-arrestin oligomerization occurs in proximity to the GPCR and regulates GPCR functions such as internalization and signaling. This model is supported by a cryoEM structure of the adhesion receptor ADGRE1 in a 2:2 complex with β-arrestin 1, with a β-arrestin orientation that can promote oligomerization. Our work provides a paradigm for β-arrestin condensates as regulators of GPCR function, with LLPS serving as an important promoter of signaling compartmentalization at GPCRs.

Action of the Terminal Complement Pathway on Cell Membranes

The complement pathway is one of the most ancient elements of the host's innate response and includes a set of protein effectors that rapidly react against pathogens. The late stages of the complement reaction are broadly categorised into two major outcomes. Firstly, C5a receptors, expressed on membranes of host cells, are activated by C5a to generate pro-inflammatory responses. Secondly, target cells are lysed by a hetero-oligomeric pore known as the membrane attack complex (MAC) that punctures the cellular membrane, causing ion and osmotic flux. Generally, several membrane-bound and soluble inhibitors protect the host membrane from complement damage. This includes inhibitors against the MAC, such as clusterin and CD59. This review addresses the most recent molecular and structural insights behind the activation and modulation of the integral membrane proteins, the C5a receptors (C5aR1 and C5aR2), as well as the regulation of MAC assembly. The second aspect of the review focuses on the molecular basis behind inflammatory diseases that are reflective of failure to regulate the terminal complement effectors. Although each arm is unique in its function, both pathways may share similar outcomes in these diseases. As such, the review outlines potential synergy and crosstalk between C5a receptor activation and MAC-mediated cellular responses.

Structure and self-association of Arrestin-1

Arrestins halt cell signaling by binding to phosphorylated activated G protein-coupled receptors. Arrestin-1 binds to rhodopsin, arrestin-4 binds to cone opsins, and arrestins-2,3 bind to the rest of GPCRs. In addition, it has been reported that arrestin-1 is functionally expressed in mouse cone photoreceptors. The structural characterization of arrestins was spearheaded by the elucidation of the crystal structure of bovine arrestin-1. Further progress in arrestin structural biology showed that the general fold of the four vertebrate arrestin subtypes is conserved and that self-association seems to play important physiological roles. In solution, mammalian arrestin-1 has been proposed to exist in a species-dependent equilibrium between monomers, dimers, and tetramers, the activated monomer being the form that binds to photo-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin. However, the nature and function of the oligomers of the different arrestin subtypes are still under debate. This article reviews several structural aspects of arrestin-1 in light of two recent crystal structures of Xenopus arrestin-1, which have provided insights on the structure, self-association, activation, and evolution of arrestins in general, and of arrestin-1 in particular.

A lipidated peptide derived from the C-terminal tail of the vasopressin 2 receptor shows promise as a new β-arrestin inhibitor

β-arrestins play pivotal roles in seven transmembrane receptor (7TMR) signalling and trafficking. To study their functional role in regulating specific receptor systems, current research relies mainly on genetic tools, as few pharmacological options are available. To address this issue, we designed and synthesised a novel lipidated phosphomimetic peptide inhibitor targeting β-arrestins, called ARIP, which was developed based on the C-terminal tail (A343-S371) of the vasopressin V2 receptor. As the V2R sequence has been shown to bind β-arrestins with high affinity, we added an N-terminal palmitate residue to allow membrane tethering and cell entry. Here, using BRET2-based biosensors, we demonstrated the ability of ARIP to inhibit agonist-induced β-arrestin recruitment on a series of 7TMRs that includes both stable and transient β-arrestin binders, with efficiencies that depend on receptor type. In addition, we showed that ARIP was unable to recruit β-arrestins to the cell membrane by itself, and that it did not interfere with G protein signalling. Molecular modelling studies also revealed that ARIP binds β-arrestins as does V2Rpp, the phosphorylated peptide derived from V2R, and that replacing the p-Ser and p-Thr residues of V2Rpp with Glu residues does not alter ARIP's inhibitory activity on β-arrestin recruitment. Importantly, ARIP exerted an opioid-sparing effect in vivo, as intrathecal injection of ARIP potentiated morphine's analgesic effect in the tail-flick test, consistent with previous findings of genetic inhibition of β-arrestins. ARIP therefore represents a promising pharmacological tool for investigating the fine-tuning roles of β-arrestins in 7TMR-driven pathophysiological processes.

Insights into the Activation and Self-Association of Arrestin-1

Arrestins halt signal transduction by binding to the phosphorylated C-termini of activated G protein-coupled receptors. Arrestin-1, the first subtype discovered, binds to rhodopsin in rod cells. Mutations in SAG, the gene encoding Arrestin-1, are linked to Oguchi disease, characterized by delayed dark adaptation. Since the discovery of Arrestin-1, substantial progress has been made in understanding the role of these regulatory proteins in phototransduction, including the characterization of visual phenotypes of animals and humans lacking this protein, discovery of splice variants, and documentation of its binding to inositol-polyphosphates. Arrestin-1 was one of the first structurally characterized proteins in the phototransduction cascade. However, there are knowledge gaps regarding the conformational intermediates leading to its binding to phosphorylated rhodopsin. Among various mammalian Arrestin-1 conformations captured via crystallography, the preactivated state is represented by the mutant R175E-Arrestin-1 and by a C-terminally truncated splice variant (p44). This report describes a novel purification method of Arrestin-1 from bovine retinas followed by limited proteolysis to obtain a protein resembling p44. We solved the crystal structure of this preactivated, shortened 3-367Arrestin-1 at a resolution of 1.40 Å. The structure reveals a more complete picture of the finger loop structure and of the role of the polar core in the activation of Arrestin-1. The structure of 3-367Arrestin-1 captures an intermediate form halfway between the inactive and fully activated conformations of Arrestin-1. Finally, we addressed the question of Arrestin-1 oligomerization by comparing the packing interfaces in different Arrestin-1 crystals and dimer models predicted by AlphaFold 3.

The Role of Individual Residues in the N-Terminus of Arrestin-1 in Rhodopsin Binding

Sequences and three-dimensional structures of the four vertebrate arrestins are very similar, yet in sharp contrast to other subtypes, arrestin-1 demonstrates exquisite selectivity for the active phosphorylated form of its cognate receptor, rhodopsin. The N-terminus participates in receptor binding and serves as the anchor of the C-terminus, the release of which facilitates arrestin transition into a receptor-binding state. We tested the effects of substitutions of fourteen residues in the N-terminus of arrestin-1 on the binding to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin of wild-type protein and its enhanced mutant with C-terminal deletion that demonstrates higher binding to both functional forms of rhodopsin. Profound effects of mutations identified lysine-15 as the main phosphate sensor and phenylalanine-13 as the key anchor of the C-terminus. These residues are conserved in all arrestin subtypes. Substitutions of five other residues reduced arrestin-1 selectivity for phosphorylated rhodopsin, indicating that wild-type residues participate in fine-tuning of arrestin-1 binding. Differential effects of numerous substitutions in wild-type and an enhanced mutant arrestin-1 suggest that these two proteins bind rhodopsin differently.

Arrestin-3 binds parkin and enhances parkin-dependent mitophagy

Arrestins were discovered for their role in homologous desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Later non-visual arrestins were shown to regulate several signaling pathways. Some of these pathways require arrestin binding to GPCRs, the regulation of others is receptor independent. Here, we demonstrate that arrestin-3 binds the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin via multiple sites, preferentially interacting with its RING0 domain. Identification of the parkin domains involved suggests that arrestin-3 likely relieves parkin autoinhibition and/or stabilizes the enzymatically active "open" conformation of parkin. Arrestin-3 binding enhances ubiquitination by parkin of the mitochondrial protein mitofusin-1 and facilitates parkin-mediated mitophagy in HeLa cells. Furthermore, arrestin-3 and its mutant with enhanced parkin binding rescue mitofusin-1 ubiquitination and mitophagy in the presence of the Parkinson's disease-associated R275W parkin mutant, which is defective in both functions. Thus, modulation of parkin activity via arrestin-3 might be a novel strategy of anti-parkinsonian therapy.

A small molecule enhances arrestin-3 binding to the β2-adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is terminated by arrestin binding to a phosphorylated receptor. Binding propensity has been shown to be modulated by stabilizing the pre-activated state of arrestin through point mutations or C-tail truncation. Here, we hypothesize that pre-activated rotated states can be stabilized by small molecules, and this can promote binding to phosphorylation-deficient receptors, which underly a variety of human disorders. We performed virtual screening on druggable pockets identified on pre-activated conformations in Molecular Dynamics trajectories of arrestin-3, and found a compound targeting an activation switch, the back loop at the inter-domain interface. According to our model, consistent with available biochemical and structural data, the compound destabilized the ionic lock between the finger and the back loop, and enabled transition of the `gate loop` towards the pre-activated state, which stabilizes pre-activated inter-domain rotation. The predicted binding pocket is consistent with saturation-transfer difference NMR data indicating close contact between the piperazine moiety of the compound and C/finger loops. The compound increases in-cell arrestin-3 binding to phosphorylation-deficient and wild-type β2-adrenergic receptor, but not to muscarinic M2 receptor, as verified by FRET and NanoBiT. This study demonstrates that the back loop can be targeted to modulate interaction of arrestin with phosphorylation-deficient GPCRs in a receptor-specific manner.

Mechanisms of amphibian arrestin 1 self-association and dynamic distribution in retinal photoreceptors

Visual arrestin 1 (Arr1) is an essential protein for termination of the light response in photoreceptors. While mammalian Arr1s form dimers and tetramers at physiological concentrations in vitro, oligomerization in other vertebrates has not been studied. Here we examine self-association of Arr1 from two amphibian species, Xenopus laevis (xArr1) and Ambystoma tigrinum (salArr1). Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation showed that xArr1 and salArr1 oligomerization is limited to dimers. The KD for dimer formation was 53 μM for xArr1 and 44 μM for salArr1, similar to the 69 μM KD for bovine Arr1 (bArr1) dimers. Mutations of orthologous amino acids important for mammalian Arr1 oligomerization had no impact on xArr1 dimerization. Crystallography showed that the fold of xArr1 closely resembles that of bArr1 and crystal structures in different space groups revealed two potential xArr1 dimer forms: a symmetric dimer with a C-domain interface (CC dimer), resembling the bArr1 solution dimer, and an asymmetric dimer with an N-domain/C-domain interface. Mutagenesis of residues predicted to interact in either of these two dimer forms yielded modest reduction in dimer affinity, suggesting that the dimer interfaces compete or are not unique. Indeed, small-angle X-ray scattering and protein painting data were consistent with a symmetric anti-parallel solution dimer (AP dimer) distinct from the assemblies observed by crystallography. Finally, a computational model evaluating xArr1 binding to compartment-specific partners and partitioning based on heterogeneity of available cytoplasmic spaces shows that Arr1 distribution in dark-adapted photoreceptors is largely explained by the excluded volume effect together with tuning by oligomerization.

Molecular mechanism of β-arrestin-2 pre-activation by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate

Phosphorylated residues of G protein-coupled receptors bind to the N-domain of arrestin, resulting in the release of its C-terminus. This induces further allosteric conformational changes, such as polar core disruption, alteration of interdomain loops, and domain rotation, which transform arrestins into the receptor-activated state. It is widely accepted that arrestin activation occurs by conformational changes propagated from the N- to the C-domain. However, recent studies have revealed that binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to the C-domain transforms arrestins into a pre-active state. Here, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying PIP2-induced arrestin pre-activation. We compare the conformational changes of β-arrestin-2 upon binding of PIP2 or phosphorylated C-tail peptide of vasopressin receptor type 2 using hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). Introducing point mutations on the potential routes of the allosteric conformational changes and analyzing these mutant constructs with HDX-MS reveals that PIP2-binding at the C-domain affects the back loop, which destabilizes the gate loop and βXX to transform β-arrestin-2 into the pre-active state.

Insight into the regulatory mechanism of β-arrestin2 and its emerging role in diseases

β-arrestin2, a member of the arrestin family, mediates the desensitization and internalization of most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and functions as a scaffold protein in signalling pathways. Previous studies have demonstrated that β-arrestin2 expression is dysregulated in malignant tumours, fibrotic diseases, cardiovascular diseases and metabolic diseases, suggesting its pathological roles. Transcription and post-transcriptional modifications can affect the expression of β-arrestin2. Furthermore, post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and S-nitrosylation affect the cellular localization of β-arrestin2 and its interaction with downstream signalling molecules, which further regulate the activity of β-arrestin2. This review summarizes the structure and function of β-arrestin2 and reveals the mechanisms involved in the regulation of β-arrestin2 at multiple levels. Additionally, recent studies on the role of β-arrestin2 in some major diseases and its therapeutic prospects have been discussed to provide a reference for the development of drugs targeting β-arrestin2.

Ternary model structural complex of C5a, C5aR2, and β-arrestin1

Complement component fragment 5a (C5a) is one of the potent proinflammatory modulators of the complement system. C5a recruits two genomically related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), like C5aR1 and C5aR2, constituting a binary complex. The C5a-C5aR1/C5aR2 binary complexes involve other transducer proteins like heterotrimeric G-proteins and β-arrestins to generate the fully active ternary complexes that trigger intracellular signaling through downstream effector molecules in tissues. In the absence of structural data, we had recently developed highly refined model structures of C5aR2 in its inactive (free), meta-active (complexed to the CT-peptide of C5a), and active (complexed to C5a) state embedded to a model palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) bilayer. Compared to C5aR1, C5aR2 is established as a noncanonical GPCR, as it recruits and signals through β-arrestins rather than G-proteins. Notably, structural understanding of the ternary complex involving C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin is currently unknown. The current study has attempted to fill the gap by generating a highly refined, fully active ternary model structural complex of the C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 embedded in a model POPC bilayer. The computational modeling, 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) studies, and the principal component analysis (PCA), including the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM PBSA) based data presented in this study, provide an experimentally testable hypothesis about C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 extendable to other such ternary systems. The model ternary complex of C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 will further enrich the current structural understanding related to the interaction of β-arrestins with the C5a-C5aR2 system.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

GPCR-dependent and -independent arrestin signaling

Biological activity of free arrestins is often overlooked. Based on available data, we compare arrestin-mediated signaling that requires and does not require binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Receptor-bound arrestins activate ERK1/2, Src, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Yet, arrestin-3 regulation of Src family member Fgr does not appear to involve receptors. Free arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK family kinases, preferentially binds E3 ubiquitin ligases Mdm2 and parkin, and facilitates parkin-dependent mitophagy. The binding of arrestins to microtubules and calmodulin and their function in focal adhesion disassembly and apoptosis also do not involve receptors. Biased GPCR ligands and the phosphorylation barcode can only affect receptor-dependent arrestin signaling. Thus, elucidation of receptor dependence or independence of arrestin functions has important scientific and therapeutic implications.

Arrestins: A Small Family of Multi-Functional Proteins

The first member of the arrestin family, visual arrestin-1, was discovered in the late 1970s. Later, the other three mammalian subtypes were identified and cloned. The first described function was regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling: arrestins bind active phosphorylated GPCRs, blocking their coupling to G proteins. It was later discovered that receptor-bound and free arrestins interact with numerous proteins, regulating GPCR trafficking and various signaling pathways, including those that determine cell fate. Arrestins have no enzymatic activity; they function by organizing multi-protein complexes and localizing their interaction partners to particular cellular compartments. Today we understand the molecular mechanism of arrestin interactions with GPCRs better than the mechanisms underlying other functions. However, even limited knowledge enabled the construction of signaling-biased arrestin mutants and extraction of biologically active monofunctional peptides from these multifunctional proteins. Manipulation of cellular signaling with arrestin-based tools has research and likely therapeutic potential: re-engineered proteins and their parts can produce effects that conventional small-molecule drugs cannot.

The role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in GLP-1R β-arrestin recruitment and internalisation

The glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a validated clinical target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Unlike most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the GLP-1R undergoes an atypical mode of internalisation that does not require β-arrestins. While differences in GLP-1R trafficking and β-arrestin recruitment have been observed between clinically used GLP-1R agonists, the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in affecting these pathways has not been comprehensively assessed. In this study, we quantified the contribution of GRKs to agonist-mediated GLP-1R internalisation and β-arrestin recruitment profiles using cells where endogenous β-arrestins, or non-visual GRKs were knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Our results confirm the previously established atypical β-arrestin-independent mode of GLP-1R internalisation and revealed that GLP-1R internalisation is dependent on the expression of GRKs. Interestingly, agonist-mediated GLP-1R β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 recruitment were differentially affected by endogenous GRK knockout with β-arrestin 1 recruitment more sensitive to GRK knockout than β-arrestin 2 recruitment. Moreover, individual overexpression of GRK2, GRK3, GRK5 or GRK6 in a newly generated GRK2/3/4/5/6 HEK293 cells, rescued agonist-mediated β-arrestin 1 recruitment and internalisation profiles to similar levels, suggesting that there is no specific GRK isoform that drives these pathways. This study advances mechanistic understanding of agonist-mediated GLP-1R internalisation and provides novel insights into how GRKs may fine-tune GLP-1R signalling.

The multifaceted functions of β-arrestins and their therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases

Arrestins are multifunctional proteins that regulate G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, signaling, and internalization. The arrestin family consists of four subtypes: visual arrestin1, β-arrestin1, β-arrestin2, and visual arrestin-4. Recent studies have revealed the multifunctional roles of β-arrestins beyond GPCR signaling, including scaffolding and adapter functions, and physically interacting with non-GPCR receptors. Increasing evidence suggests that β-arrestins are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). β-arrestins physically interact with γ-secretase, leading to increased production and accumulation of amyloid-beta in AD. Furthermore, β-arrestin oligomers inhibit the autophagy cargo receptor p62/SQSTM1, resulting in tau accumulation and aggregation in FTD. In PD, β-arrestins are upregulated in postmortem brain tissue and an MPTP model, and the β2AR regulates SNCA gene expression. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2, and describe their physiological functions and roles in neurodegenerative diseases. The multifaceted roles of β-arrestins and their involvement in neurodegenerative diseases suggest that they may serve as promising therapeutic targets.

Disordered-to-ordered transitions in assembly factors allow the complex II catalytic subunit to switch binding partners

Complex II (CII) activity controls phenomena that require crosstalk between metabolism and signaling, including neurodegeneration, cancer metabolism, immune activation, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. CII activity can be regulated at the level of assembly, a process that leverages metastable assembly intermediates. The nature of these intermediates and how CII subunits transfer between metastable complexes remains unclear. In this work, we identify metastable species containing the SDHA subunit and its assembly factors, and we assign a preferred temporal sequence of appearance of these species during CII assembly. Structures of two species show that the assembly factors undergo disordered-to-ordered transitions without the appearance of significant secondary structure. The findings identify that intrinsically disordered regions are critical in regulating CII assembly, an observation that has implications for the control of assembly in other biomolecular complexes.

Molecular insights into atypical modes of β-arrestin interaction with seven transmembrane receptors

β-arrestins (βarrs) are multifunctional proteins involved in signaling and regulation of seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), and their interaction is driven primarily by agonist-induced receptor activation and phosphorylation. Here, we present seven cryo-electron microscopy structures of βarrs either in the basal state, activated by the muscarinic receptor subtype 2 (M2R) through its third intracellular loop, or activated by the βarr-biased decoy D6 receptor (D6R). Combined with biochemical, cellular, and biophysical experiments, these structural snapshots allow the visualization of atypical engagement of βarrs with 7TMRs and also reveal a structural transition in the carboxyl terminus of βarr2 from a β strand to an α helix upon activation by D6R. Our study provides previously unanticipated molecular insights into the structural and functional diversity encoded in 7TMR-βarr complexes with direct implications for exploring novel therapeutic avenues.

Interactions between AT1R and GRKs: the determinants for activation of signaling pathways involved in blood pressure regulation

The success of Angiotensin II receptor blockers, specifically Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonists as antihypertensive drug emphasizes the involvement of AT1R in Essential hypertension. The structural insights and mutational studies of Ang II-AT1R have brought about the vision to design Ang II analogs that selectively activate the pathways with beneficial and cardioprotective effects such as cell survival and hinder the deleterious effects such as hypertrophy and cell death. AT1R belongs to G-protein coupled receptors and is regulated by G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) that either uncouples Gq protein for receptor desensitization or phosphorylate C-terminus to recruit β-arrestin for internalization of the receptor. The interaction of GRKs with ligand activated AT1R induces conformational changes and signal either Gq dependent or Gq independent pathways. These interactions might explain the complex regulatory mechanisms and offer promising ideas for hypertension therapeutics. This article reviews the functional role of AT1R, organization of GRK genes and regulation of AT1R by GRKs that play significant role in desensitization and internalization of the receptors.

In-Cell Arrestin-Receptor Interaction Assays

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent ∼30% of current drug targets. Ligand binding to these receptors activates G proteins and arrestins, which function in different signaling pathways. Given that functionally selective or biased ligands preferentially activate one of these two groups of pathways, they may be superior medications for certain disease states. The identification of such ligands requires robust drug screening assays for both G protein and arrestin activity. This unit describes protocols for assays that monitor reversible arrestin recruitment to GPCRs in living cells using either bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) or nanoluciferase complementation (NanoLuc). Two types of assays can be used: one configuration directly measures arrestin recruitment to a GPCR fused to a protein tag at its intracellular C-terminus, whereas the other configuration detects arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane in response to activation of an unmodified GPCR. Together, these assays are powerful tools for studying dynamic interactions between GPCRs and arrestins. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Receptor-arrestin BRET assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to receptors Basic Protocol 2: Receptor-arrestin NANOBIT assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to receptors Alternative Protocol 1: BRET assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to the plasma membrane Alternative Protocol 2: NANOBIT assay to measure ligand-induced recruitment of arrestin to the plasma membrane Support Protocol 1: Optimization of polyethylenimine (PEI) concentration for transfection.

Expression of Untagged Arrestins in E. coli and Their Purification

Purified arrestin proteins are necessary for biochemical, biophysical, and structural studies of these versatile regulators of cell signaling. Described herein is a basic protocol for arrestin expression in Escherichia coli and purification of tag-free wild-type and mutant arrestins. The method includes ammonium sulfate precipitation of arrestins from cell lysates, followed by Heparin-Sepharose chromatography. Depending on the arrestin type and/or mutations, the next step is Q-Sepharose or SP-Sepharose chromatography. In many cases, the nonbinding column is used as a filter to bind contaminants without retaining arrestin. In some cases, both chromatographic steps must be performed sequentially to achieve high purity. Purified arrestins can be concentrated up to 10 mg/ml, remain fully functional, and withstand several cycles of freezing and thawing, provided that the overall salt concentration is maintained at or above physiological levels. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Large-scale expression and purification of arrestins Alternate Protocol: Purification of arrestin-3 and truncated form of arrestin-1-(1-378) Support Protocol: Small-scale test expression of wild-type and mutant arrestins in E. coli.

Arrestin-3-Dependent Activation of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinases (JNKs)

Only 1 out of 4 mammalian arrestin subtypes, arrestin-3, facilitates the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) family kinases. Here, we describe two different sets of protocols used for elucidating the mechanisms involved. One is based on reconstitution of signaling modules from the following purified proteins: arrestin-3, MKK4, MKK7, JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3. The main advantage of this method is that it unambiguously establishes which effects are direct because only intended purified proteins are present in these assays. The key drawback is that the upstream-most kinases of these cascades, ASK1 or other MAP3Ks, are not available in purified form, limiting reconstitution to incomplete two-kinase modules. The other approach is used for analyzing the effects of arrestin-3 on JNK activation in intact cells. In this case, signaling modules include ASK1 and/or other MAP3Ks. However, as every cell expresses thousands of different proteins, their possible effects on the readout cannot be excluded. Nonetheless, the combination of in vitro reconstitution from purified proteins and cell-based assays makes it possible to elucidate the mechanisms of arrestin-3-dependent activation of JNK family kinases. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Construction of arrestin-3-scaffolded MKK4/7-JNK1/2/3 signaling modules in vitro using purified proteins Alternate Protocol 1: Characterization of arrestin-3-mediated JNK1/2 activation by MKK4/7 by measurement of JNK1/2 phosphorylation using immunoblotting with anti-phospho-JNK antibody Support Protocol 1: Expression, purification, and activation of GST-MKK4 Support Protocol 2: Expression, purification, and activation of GST-MKK7-His6 Support Protocol 3: Expression, purification, and activation of tagless JNK1Α1 Support Protocol 4: Expression, purification, and activation of tagless JNK2Α2 Basic Protocol 2: Analysis of the role of arrestin-3 in ASK1/MKK4/MKK7-induced JNK activation in intact cells Alternate Protocol 2: Analysis of the role of arrestin-3 in MKK4-induced JNK activation in intact cells Basic Protocol 3: Characterization of the biphasic effect of arrestin-3 on ASK1/MKK7-stimulated JNK phosphorylation in cells.

Fine-tuning GPCR-mediated neuromodulation by biasing signaling through different G protein subunits

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate neuromodulation through the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαβγ). Classical models depict that G protein activation leads to a one-to-one formation of Gα-GTP and Gβγ species. Each of these species propagates signaling by independently acting on effectors, but the mechanisms by which response fidelity is ensured by coordinating Gα and Gβγ responses remain unknown. Here, we reveal a paradigm of G protein regulation whereby the neuronal protein GINIP (Gα inhibitory interacting protein) biases inhibitory GPCR responses to favor Gβγ over Gα signaling. Tight binding of GINIP to Gαi-GTP precludes its association with effectors (adenylyl cyclase) and, simultaneously, with regulator-of-G-protein-signaling (RGS) proteins that accelerate deactivation. As a consequence, Gαi-GTP signaling is dampened, whereas Gβγ signaling is enhanced. We show that this mechanism is essential to prevent the imbalances of neurotransmission that underlie increased seizure susceptibility in mice. Our findings reveal an additional layer of regulation within a quintessential mechanism of signal transduction that sets the tone of neurotransmission.

Structural snapshots uncover a key phosphorylation motif in GPCRs driving β-arrestin activation

Agonist-induced GPCR phosphorylation is a key determinant for the binding and activation of β-arrestins (βarrs). However, it is not entirely clear how different GPCRs harboring divergent phosphorylation patterns impart converging active conformation on βarrs leading to broadly conserved functional responses such as desensitization, endocytosis, and signaling. Here, we present multiple cryo-EM structures of activated βarrs in complex with distinct phosphorylation patterns derived from the carboxyl terminus of different GPCRs. These structures help identify a P-X-P-P type phosphorylation motif in GPCRs that interacts with a spatially organized K-K-R-R-K-K sequence in the N-domain of βarrs. Sequence analysis of the human GPCRome reveals the presence of this phosphorylation pattern in a large number of receptors, and its contribution in βarr activation is demonstrated by targeted mutagenesis experiments combined with an intrabody-based conformational sensor. Taken together, our findings provide important structural insights into the ability of distinct GPCRs to activate βarrs through a significantly conserved mechanism.

GPCR Binding and JNK3 Activation by Arrestin-3 Have Different Structural Requirements

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among the four mammalian subtypes, only arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK3 in cells. In available structures, Lys-295 in the lariat loop of arrestin-3 and its homologue Lys-294 in arrestin-2 directly interact with the activator-attached phosphates. We compared the roles of arrestin-3 conformational equilibrium and Lys-295 in GPCR binding and JNK3 activation. Several mutants with enhanced ability to bind GPCRs showed much lower activity towards JNK3, whereas a mutant that does not bind GPCRs was more active. The subcellular distribution of mutants did not correlate with GPCR recruitment or JNK3 activation. Charge neutralization and reversal mutations of Lys-295 differentially affected receptor binding on different backgrounds but had virtually no effect on JNK3 activation. Thus, GPCR binding and arrestin-3-assisted JNK3 activation have distinct structural requirements, suggesting that facilitation of JNK3 activation is the function of arrestin-3 that is not bound to a GPCR.

Plasma membrane preassociation drives β-arrestin coupling to receptors and activation

β-arrestin plays a key role in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling and desensitization. Despite recent structural advances, the mechanisms that govern receptor-β-arrestin interactions at the plasma membrane of living cells remain elusive. Here, we combine single-molecule microscopy with molecular dynamics simulations to dissect the complex sequence of events involved in β-arrestin interactions with both receptors and the lipid bilayer. Unexpectedly, our results reveal that β-arrestin spontaneously inserts into the lipid bilayer and transiently interacts with receptors via lateral diffusion on the plasma membrane. Moreover, they indicate that, following receptor interaction, the plasma membrane stabilizes β-arrestin in a longer-lived, membrane-bound state, allowing it to diffuse to clathrin-coated pits separately from the activating receptor. These results expand our current understanding of β-arrestin function at the plasma membrane, revealing a critical role for β-arrestin preassociation with the lipid bilayer in facilitating its interactions with receptors and subsequent activation.

GPCR binding and JNK3 activation by arrestin-3 have different structural requirements

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among the four mammalian subtypes, only arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK3 in cells. In available structures, Lys-295 in the lariat loop of arrestin-3 and its homologue Lys-294 in arrestin-2 directly interact with the activator-attached phosphates. We compared the role of arrestin-3 conformational equilibrium and of Lys-295 in GPCR binding and JNK3 activation. Several mutants with enhanced ability to bind GPCRs showed much lower activity towards JNK3, whereas a mutant that does not bind GPCRs was more active. Subcellular distribution of mutants did not correlate with GPCR recruitment or JNK3 activation. Charge neutralization and reversal mutations of Lys-295 differentially affected receptor binding on different backgrounds, but had virtually no effect on JNK3 activation. Thus, GPCR binding and arrestin-3-assisted JNK3 activation have distinct structural requirements, suggesting that facilitation of JNK3 activation is the function of arrestin-3 that is not bound to a GPCR.

Structural details of a Class B GPCR-arrestin complex revealed by genetically encoded crosslinkers in living cells

Understanding the molecular basis of arrestin-mediated regulation of GPCRs is critical for deciphering signaling mechanisms and designing functional selectivity. However, structural studies of GPCR-arrestin complexes are hampered by their highly dynamic nature. Here, we dissect the interaction of arrestin-2 (arr2) with the secretin-like parathyroid hormone 1 receptor PTH1R using genetically encoded crosslinking amino acids in live cells. We identify 136 intermolecular proximity points that guide the construction of energy-optimized molecular models for the PTH1R-arr2 complex. Our data reveal flexible receptor elements missing in existing structures, including intracellular loop 3 and the proximal C-tail, and suggest a functional role of a hitherto overlooked positively charged region at the arrestin N-edge. Unbiased MD simulations highlight the stability and dynamic nature of the complex. Our integrative approach yields structural insights into protein-protein complexes in a biologically relevant live-cell environment and provides information inaccessible to classical structural methods, while also revealing the dynamics of the system.

All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Indicated the Involvement of a Conserved Polar Signaling Channel in the Activation Mechanism of the Type I Cannabinoid Receptor

The type I cannabinoid G protein-coupled receptor (CB1, GPCR) is an intensely investigated pharmacological target, owing to its involvement in numerous physiological functions as well as pathological processes such as cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders and neuropathic pain. In order to develop modern medications that exert their effects through binding to the CB1 receptor, it is essential to understand the structural mechanism of activation of this protein. The pool of atomic resolution experimental structures of GPCRs has been expanding rapidly in the past decade, providing invaluable information about the function of these receptors. According to the current state of the art, the activity of GPCRs involves structurally distinct, dynamically interconverting functional states and the activation is controlled by a cascade of interconnecting conformational switches in the transmembrane domain. A current challenge is to uncover how different functional states are activated and what specific ligand properties are responsible for the selectivity towards those different functional states. Our recent studies of the μ-opioid and β₂-adrenergic receptors (MOP and β₂AR, respectively) revealed that the orthosteric binding pockets and the intracellular surfaces of these receptors are connected through a channel of highly conserved polar amino acids whose dynamic motions are in high correlation in the agonist- and G protein-bound active states. This and independent literature data led us to hypothesize that, in addition to consecutive conformational transitions, a shift of macroscopic polarization takes place in the transmembrane domain, which is furnished by the rearrangement of polar species through their concerted movements. Here, we examined the CB1 receptor signaling complexes utilizing microsecond scale, all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to see if our previous assumptions could be applied to the CB1 receptor too. Apart from the identification of the previously proposed general features of the activation mechanism, several specific properties of the CB1 have been indicated that could possibly be associated with the signaling profile of this receptor.

Surveying nonvisual arrestins reveals allosteric interactions between functional sites

Arrestins are important scaffolding proteins that are expressed in all vertebrate animals. They regulate cell-signaling events upon binding to active G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and trigger endocytosis of active GPCRs. While many of the functional sites on arrestins have been characterized, the question of how these sites interact is unanswered. We used anisotropic network modeling (ANM) together with our covariance compliment techniques to survey all the available structures of the nonvisual arrestins to map how structural changes and protein-binding affect their structural dynamics. We found that activation and clathrin binding have a marked effect on arrestin dynamics, and that these dynamics changes are localized to a small number of distant functional sites. These sites include α-helix 1, the lariat loop, nuclear localization domain, and the C-domain β-sheets on the C-loop side. Our techniques suggest that clathrin binding and/or GPCR activation of arrestin perturb the dynamics of these sites independent of structural changes.

Do arrestin oligomers have specific functions?

Arrestins are a small family of versatile regulators of cell signaling. Arrestins regulate signaling and trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors, regulate and direct to particular subcellular compartments numerous protein kinases, ubiquitin ligases, etc. Three out of four arrestin subtypes expressed in vertebrates self-associate, each forming oligomers of a distinct size and shape. While the structures of the solution oligomers of arrestin-1, -2, and -3 have been elucidated, no function specific for the oligomeric form of either of these three subtypes has been identified thus far. Considering how multi-functional average-sized (~45 kDa) arrestin proteins were found to be, it appears likely that certain functions are predominantly or exclusively fulfilled by monomeric and oligomeric forms of each subtype.

The Role of Arrestin-1 Middle Loop in Rhodopsin Binding

Arrestins preferentially bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The middle loop, highly conserved in all arrestin subtypes, is localized in the central crest on the GPCR-binding side. Upon receptor binding, it directly interacts with bound GPCR and demonstrates the largest movement of any arrestin element in the structures of the complexes. Comprehensive mutagenesis of the middle loop of rhodopsin-specific arrestin-1 suggests that it primarily serves as a suppressor of binding to non-preferred forms of the receptor. Several mutations in the middle loop increase the binding to unphosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin severalfold, which makes them candidates for improving enhanced phosphorylation-independent arrestins. The data also suggest that enhanced forms of arrestin do not bind GPCRs exactly like the wild-type protein. Thus, the structures of the arrestin-receptor complexes, in all of which different enhanced arrestin mutants and reengineered receptors were used, must be interpreted with caution.

β-arrestin1 and 2 exhibit distinct phosphorylation-dependent conformations when coupling to the same GPCR in living cells

β-arrestins mediate regulatory processes for over 800 different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by adopting specific conformations that result from the geometry of the GPCR–β-arrestin complex. However, whether β-arrestin1 and 2 respond differently for binding to the same GPCR is still unknown. Employing GRK knockout cells and β-arrestins lacking the finger-loop-region, we show that the two isoforms prefer to associate with the active parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R) in different complex configurations (“hanging” and “core”). Furthermore, the utilisation of advanced NanoLuc/FlAsH-based biosensors reveals distinct conformational signatures of β-arrestin1 and 2 when bound to active PTH1R (P-R*). Moreover, we assess β-arrestin conformational changes that are induced specifically by proximal and distal C-terminal phosphorylation and in the absence of GPCR kinases (GRKs) (R*). Here, we show differences between conformational changes that are induced by P-R* or R* receptor states and further disclose the impact of site-specific GPCR phosphorylation on arrestin-coupling and function.

Here the authors present improved intramolecular sensors for β-arrestin2 and 1, which enable assessment of conformational changes of both isoforms in living cells. These reveal that the same GPCR induces differential conformational rearrangements that determine the functional diversity between the two β-arrestins.

G protein-coupled receptor interactions with arrestins and GPCR kinases: The unresolved issue of signal bias

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) and arrestins interact with agonist-bound GPCRs to promote receptor desensitization and downregulation. They also trigger signaling cascades distinct from those of heterotrimeric G proteins. Biased agonists for GPCRs that favor either heterotrimeric G protein or GRK/arrestin signaling are of profound pharmacological interest because they could usher in a new generation of drugs with greatly reduced side effects. One mechanism by which biased agonism might occur is by stabilizing receptor conformations that preferentially bind to GRKs and/or arrestins. In this review, we explore this idea by comparing structures of GPCRs bound to heterotrimeric G proteins with those of the same GPCRs in complex with arrestins and GRKs. The arrestin and GRK complexes all exhibit high conformational heterogeneity, which is likely a consequence of their unusual ability to adapt and bind to hundreds of different GPCRs. This dynamic behavior, along with the experimental tactics required to stabilize GPCR complexes for biophysical analysis, confounds these comparisons, but some possible molecular mechanisms of bias are beginning to emerge. We also examine if and how the recent structures advance our understanding of how arrestins parse the "phosphorylation barcodes" installed in the intracellular loops and tails of GPCRs by GRKs. In the future, structural analyses of arrestins in complex with intact receptors that have well-defined native phosphorylation barcodes, such as those installed by the two nonvisual subfamilies of GRKs, will be particularly illuminating.

GPCR kinases generate an APH1A phosphorylation barcode to regulate amyloid-β generation

Emerging evidence suggests that G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are associated with the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, GRKs have not been directly implicated in regulation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) pathogenic cascade in AD. Here, we determine that GRKs phosphorylate a non-canonical substrate, anterior pharynx-defective 1A (APH1A), an integral component of the γ-secretase complex. Significantly, we show that GRKs generate distinct phosphorylation barcodes in intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) and the C terminus of APH1A, which differentially regulate recruitment of the scaffolding protein β-arrestin 2 (βarr2) to APH1A and γ-secretase-mediated Aβ generation. Further molecular dynamics simulation studies reveal an interaction between the βarr2 finger loop domain and ICL2 and ICL3 of APH1A, similar to a GPCR-β-arrestin complex, which regulates γ-secretase activity. Collectively, these studies provide insight into the molecular and structural determinants of the APH1A-βarr2 interaction that critically regulate Aβ generation.

Structural basis of GPCR coupling to distinct signal transducers: implications for biased signaling

Three classes of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) partners - G proteins, GPCR kinases, and arrestins - preferentially bind active GPCRs. Our analysis suggests that the structures of GPCRs bound to these interaction partners available today do not reveal a clear conformational basis for signaling bias, which would have enabled the rational design of biased GRCR ligands. In view of this, three possibilities are conceivable: (i) there are no generalizable GPCR conformations conducive to binding a particular type of partner; (ii) subtle differences in the orientation of individual residues and/or their interactions not easily detectable in the receptor-transducer structures determine partner preference; or (iii) the dynamics of GPCR binding to different types of partners rather than the structures of the final complexes might underlie transducer bias.

Solo vs. Chorus: Monomers and Oligomers of Arrestin Proteins

Three out of four subtypes of arrestin proteins expressed in mammals self-associate, each forming oligomers of a distinct kind. Monomers and oligomers have different subcellular localization and distinct biological functions. Here we summarize existing evidence regarding arrestin oligomerization and discuss specific functions of monomeric and oligomeric forms, although too few of the latter are known. The data on arrestins highlight biological importance of oligomerization of signaling proteins. Distinct modes of oligomerization might be an important contributing factor to the functional differences among highly homologous members of the arrestin protein family.

The Two Non-Visual Arrestins Engage ERK2 Differently

Arrestin binding to active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors terminates G protein coupling and initiates another wave of signaling. Among the effectors that bind directly to receptor-associated arrestins are extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), which promote cellular proliferation and survival. Arrestins may also engage ERK1/2 in isolation in a pre- or post-signaling complex that is likely in equilibrium with the full signal initiation complex. Molecular details of these binary complexes remain unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms whereby arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 (a.k.a. β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2, respectively) engage ERK1/2 in pairwise interactions. We find that purified arrestin-3 binds ERK2 more avidly than arrestin-2. A combination of biophysical techniques and peptide array analysis demonstrates that the molecular basis in this difference of binding strength is that the two non-visual arrestins bind ERK2 via different parts of the molecule. We propose a structural model of the ERK2-arrestin-3 complex in solution using size-exclusion chromatography coupled to small angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS). This binary complex exhibits conformational heterogeneity. We speculate that this drives the equilibrium either toward the full signaling complex with receptor-bound arrestin at the membrane or toward full dissociation in the cytoplasm. As ERK1/2 regulates cell migration, proliferation, and survival, understanding complexes that relate to its activation could be exploited to control cell fate.

GPCR kinase knockout cells reveal the impact of individual GRKs on arrestin binding and GPCR regulation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate G proteins and undergo a complex regulation by interaction with GPCR kinases (GRKs) and the formation of receptor-arrestin complexes. However, the impact of individual GRKs on arrestin binding is not clear. We report the creation of eleven combinatorial HEK293 knockout cell clones lacking GRK2/3/5/6, including single, double, triple and the quadruple GRK knockout. Analysis of β-arrestin1/2 interactions for twelve GPCRs in our GRK knockout cells enables the differentiation of two main receptor subsets: GRK2/3-regulated and GRK2/3/5/6-regulated receptors. Furthermore, we identify GPCRs that interact with β-arrestins via the overexpression of specific GRKs even in the absence of agonists. Finally, using GRK knockout cells, PKC inhibitors and β-arrestin mutants, we present evidence for differential receptor-β-arrestin1/2 complex configurations mediated by selective engagement of kinases. We anticipate our GRK knockout platform to facilitate the elucidation of previously unappreciated details of GRK-specific GPCR regulation and β-arrestin complex formation.

Structural Basis of Arrestin Selectivity for Active Phosphorylated G Protein-Coupled Receptors

Arrestins are a small family of proteins that bind G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Arrestin binds to active phosphorylated GPCRs with higher affinity than to all other functional forms of the receptor, including inactive phosphorylated and active unphosphorylated. The selectivity of arrestins suggests that they must have two sensors, which detect receptor-attached phosphates and the active receptor conformation independently. Simultaneous engagement of both sensors enables arrestin transition into a high-affinity receptor-binding state. This transition involves a global conformational rearrangement that brings additional elements of the arrestin molecule, including the middle loop, in contact with a GPCR, thereby stabilizing the complex. Here, we review structural and mutagenesis data that identify these two sensors and additional receptor-binding elements within the arrestin molecule. While most data were obtained with the arrestin-1-rhodopsin pair, the evidence suggests that all arrestins use similar mechanisms to achieve preferential binding to active phosphorylated GPCRs.

G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 confers isoform-specific calcium sensitivity to dopamine D2 receptor desensitization

The dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂ R) functions as an autoreceptor on dopaminergic cell bodies and terminals and as a postsynaptic receptor on a variety of neurons in the central nervous system. As a result of alternative splicing, the D₂ R is expressed as two isoforms: long (D_2L R) and short (D_2S R) differing by a stretch of 29 residues in the third intracellular loop, with D_2S R being the predominant presynaptic isoform. Recent reports described a Ca²⁺ sensitivity of the desensitization time course of potassium currents elicited via D_2S R, but not via D_2L R, when either isoform was selectively expressed in dopaminergic neurons. Here, we aimed to study the mechanism behind this subtype-specific Ca²⁺ sensitivity. Thus, we measured the desensitization of potassium channel responses evoked by D_2L R and D_2S R using two-electrode voltage clamp in Xenopus oocytes in the absence and presence of different amounts of β-arrestin2 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2), both of which are known to play important roles in D₂ R desensitization in native cells. We found that co-expression of both GRK2 and β-arrestin2 was necessary for reconstitution of the Ca²⁺ sensitivity of D_2S R desensitization, while D_2L R did not display Ca²⁺ sensitivity under these conditions. The effect of Ca²⁺ chelation by BAPTA-AM to slow the rate of D_2S R desensitization was mimicked by the GRK2 inhibitor, Cmpd101, and by the kinase-inactivating GRK2 mutation, K220R, but not by the PKC inhibitor, Gö6976, nor by the calmodulin antagonist, KN-93. Thus, Ca²⁺ -sensitive desensitization of D_2S R appears to be mediated via a GRK2 phosphorylation-dependent mechanism.

Rg3 promotes the SUMOylation of SERCA2a and corrects cardiac dysfunction in heart failure

SUMOylation of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) has been shown to play a critical role in the abnormal Ca2+ cycle of heart failure. Ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3), the main active constituent of Panax ginseng, exerts a wide range of pharmacological effects in cardiovascular diseases. However, the effect of Rg3 on abnormal Ca2+ homeostasis in heart failure has not been reported. In this study, we showed a novel role of Rg3 in the abnormal Ca2+ cycle in cardiomyocytes of mice with heart failure. Among mice undergoing transverse aortic constriction, animals that received Rg3 showed improvements in cardiac function and Ca2+ homeostasis, accompanied by increases in the SUMOylation level and SERCA2a activity. In an isoproterenol (ISO)-induced cell hypertrophy model, Rg3 reduced the ISO-induced Ca2+ overload in HL-1 cells. Gene knockout of SUMO1 in mice inhibited the cardioprotective effect of Rg3, and SUMO1 knockout mice that received Rg3 did not exhibit improved Ca2+ homeostasis in cardiomyocytes. Additionally, mutation of the SUMOylation sites of SERCA2a blocked the positive effect of Rg3 on the ISO-induced abnormal Ca2+ cycle in HL-1 cells, and was accompanied by an abnormal endoplasmic reticulum stress response and generation of ROS. Our data demonstrated that Rg3 has a positive effect on the abnormal Ca2+ cycle in the cardiomyocytes of mice with heart failure. SUMO1 is an important factor that mediates the protective effect of Rg3. Our findings suggest that drug intervention by regulating the SUMOylation of SERCA2a can provide a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of heart failure.

Universal Properties and Specificities of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor-Gs Protein Complex Activation Mechanism Revealed by All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane proteins of high pharmacological relevance. It has been proposed that their activity is linked to structurally distinct, dynamically interconverting functional states and the process of activation relies on an interconnecting network of conformational switches in the transmembrane domain. However, it is yet to be uncovered how ligands with different extents of functional effect exert their actions. According to our recent hypothesis, based on indirect observations and the literature data, the transmission of the external stimulus to the intracellular surface is accompanied by the shift of macroscopic polarization in the transmembrane domain, furnished by concerted movements of highly conserved polar motifs and the rearrangement of polar species. In this follow-up study, we have examined the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) to see if our hypothesis drawn from an extensive study of the μ-opioid receptor (MOP) is fundamental and directly transferable to other class A GPCRs. We have found that there are some general similarities between the two receptors, in agreement with previous studies, and there are some receptor-specific differences that could be associated with different signaling pathways.

New Structural Perspectives in G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Mediated Src Family Kinase Activation

Src family kinases (SFKs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The expression of these non-receptor tyrosine kinases is strongly correlated with cancer development and tumor progression. Thus, this family of proteins serves as an attractive drug target. The activation of SFKs can occur via multiple signaling pathways, yet many of them are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated regulation of SFKs, which is of considerable interest because GPCRs are among the most widely used pharmaceutical targets. This type of activation can occur through a direct interaction between the two proteins or be allosterically regulated by arrestins and G proteins. We postulate that a rearrangement of binding motifs within the active conformation of arrestin-3 mediates Src regulation by comparison of available crystal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize a potentially different activation mechanism compared to arrestin-2. Furthermore, we discuss the probable direct regulation of SFK by GPCRs and investigate the intracellular domains of exemplary GPCRs with conserved polyproline binding motifs that might serve as scaffolding domains to allow such a direct interaction. Large intracellular domains in GPCRs are often understudied and, in general, not much is known of their contribution to different signaling pathways. The suggested direct interaction between a GPCR and a SFK could allow for a potential immediate allosteric regulation of SFKs by GPCRs and thereby unravel a novel mechanism of SFK signaling. This overview will help to identify new GPCR-SFK interactions, which could serve to explain biological functions or be used to modulate downstream effectors.

Arrestin-dependent internalization of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors

The internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important mechanism regulating the signal strength and limiting the opportunity of receptor activation. Based on the importance of GPCRs, the detailed knowledge about the regulation of signal transduction is crucial. Here, current knowledge about the agonist-induced, arrestin-dependent internalization process of rhodopsin-like GPCRs is reviewed. Arrestins are conserved molecules that act as key players within the internalization process of many GPCRs. Based on highly conserved structural characteristics within the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, the identification of arrestin interaction sites in model systems can be compared and used for the investigation of internalization processes of other receptors. The increasing understanding of this essential regulation mechanism of receptors can be used for drug development targeting rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Here, we focus on the neuropeptide Y receptor family, as these receptors transmit various physiological processes such as food intake, energy homeostasis, and regulation of emotional behavior, and are further involved in pathophysiological processes like cancer, obesity and mood disorders. Hence, this receptor family represents an interesting target for the development of novel therapeutics requiring the understanding of the regulatory mechanisms influencing receptor mediated signaling.

The finger loop as an activation sensor in arrestin

The finger loop in the central crest of the receptor-binding site of arrestins engages the cavity between the transmembrane helices of activated G-protein-coupled receptors. Therefore, it was hypothesized to serve as the sensor that detects the activation state of the receptor. We performed comprehensive mutagenesis of the finger loop in bovine visual arrestin-1, generated mutant radiolabeled proteins by cell-free translation, and determined the effects of mutations on the in vitro binding of arrestin-1 to purified phosphorylated light-activated rhodopsin. This interaction is driven by two factors, rhodopsin activation and rhodopsin-attached phosphates. Therefore, the binding of arrestin-1 to light-activated unphosphorylated rhodopsin is low. To evaluate the role of the finger loop specifically in the recognition of the active receptor conformation, we tested the effects of these mutations in the context of truncated arrestin-1 that demonstrates much higher binding to unphosphorylated activated and phosphorylated inactive rhodopsin. The majority of finger loop residues proved important for arrestin-1 binding to light-activated rhodopsin, with six mutations affecting the binding exclusively to this form. Thus, the finger loop is the key element of arrestin-1 activation sensor. The data also suggest that arrestin-1 and its enhanced mutant bind various functional forms of rhodopsin differently.

Differential Involvement of ACKR3 C-Tail in β-Arrestin Recruitment, Trafficking and Internalization

Background: The atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) belongs to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Unlike classical GPCRs, this receptor does not activate G proteins in most cell types but recruits β-arrestins upon activation. ACKR3 plays an important role in cancer and vascular diseases. As recruitment of β-arrestins is triggered by phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail of GPCRs, we studied the role of different potential phosphorylation sites within the ACKR3 C-tail to further delineate the molecular mechanism of internalization and trafficking of this GPCR. Methods: We used various bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based sensors and techniques in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293T cells expressing WT or phosphorylation site mutants of ACKR3 to measure CXCL12-induced recruitment of β-arrestins and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), receptor internalization and trafficking. Results: Upon CXCL12 stimulation, ACKR3 recruits both β-arrestin 1 and 2 with equivalent kinetic profiles. We identified interactions with GRK2, 3 and 5, with GRK2 and 3 being important for β-arrestin recruitment. Upon activation, ACKR3 internalizes and recycles back to the cell membrane. We demonstrate that β-arrestin recruitment to the receptor is mainly determined by a single cluster of phosphorylated residues on the C-tail of ACKR3, and that residue T³⁵² and in part S³⁵⁵ are important residues for β-arrestin1 recruitment. Phosphorylation of the C-tail appears essential for ligand-induced internalization and important for differential β-arrestin recruitment. GRK2 and 3 play a key role in receptor internalization. Moreover, ACKR3 can still internalize when β-arrestin recruitment is impaired or in the absence of β-arrestins, using alternative internalization pathways. Our data indicate that distinct residues within the C-tail of ACKR3 differentially regulate CXCL12-induced β-arrestin recruitment, ACKR3 trafficking and internalization.

An Eight Amino Acid Segment Controls Oligomerization and Preferred Conformation of the two Non-visual Arrestins

G protein coupled receptors signal through G proteins or arrestins. A long-standing mystery in the field is why vertebrates have two non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. These isoforms are ~75% identical and 85% similar; each binds numerous receptors, and appear to have many redundant functions, as demonstrated by studies of knockout mice. We previously showed that arrestin-3 can be activated by inositol-hexakisphosphate (IP6). IP6 interacts with the receptor-binding surface of arrestin-3, induces arrestin-3 oligomerization, and this oligomer stabilizes the active conformation of arrestin-3. Here, we compared the impact of IP6 on oligomerization and conformational equilibrium of the highly homologous arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 and found that these two isoforms are regulated differently. In the presence of IP6, arrestin-2 forms "infinite" chains, where each promoter remains in the basal conformation. In contrast, full length and truncated arrestin-3 form trimers and higher-order oligomers in the presence of IP6; we showed previously that trimeric state induces arrestin-3 activation (Chen et al., 2017). Thus, in response to IP6, the two non-visual arrestins oligomerize in different ways in distinct conformations. We identified an insertion of eight residues that is conserved across arrestin-2 homologs, but absent in arrestin-3 that likely accounts for the differences in the IP6 effect. Because IP6 is ubiquitously present in cells, this suggests physiological consequences, including differences in arrestin-2/3 trafficking and JNK3 activation. The functional differences between two non-visual arrestins are in part determined by distinct modes of their oligomerization. The mode of oligomerization might regulate the function of other signaling proteins.