Fulminant hepatitis on withdrawal of chemotherapy in carriers of hepatitis C virus

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Suppress Hepatitis C Virus Replication in Infected Patients With Solid Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Data are scarce regarding the virologic impact and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We examined the virologic impact of ICI in HCV-infected patients with solid tumors and their safety.

METHODS

HCV-infected patients with solid tumor treated with ICI at our institution between April 26, 2016, and January 5, 2022, were enrolled in a prospective observational study. The primary outcomes were ICI-induced changes in HCV viremia (HCV inhibition and HCV reactivation) and safety of ICI.

RESULTS

We enrolled 52 consecutive patients with solid tumors treated with ICI. Most were men (41; 79%), White (31; 59%), without cirrhosis (34; 65%), and with HCV genotype 1 (40; 77%). Four patients (7.7%) experienced HCV inhibition while receiving ICI including 1 patient who developed undetectable viremia for 6 months in the absence of direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Two patients (4%) developed HCV reactivation, both while receiving immunosuppressive therapy for ICI-related toxic effects. Adverse events occurred in 36 patients (69%), and 39 of the 47 adverse events (83%) were grade 1-2. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 8 patients (15%), and in all cases, they were related to ICI, not to HCV. No HCV-associated liver failure or death occurred.

DISCUSSION

Inhibition of HCV replication with virologic cure can develop in patients receiving ICI without DAA. HCV reactivation occurs primarily in patients receiving immunosuppressants for ICI-related toxic effects. ICI are safe in HCV-infected patients with solid tumors. Chronic HCV infection should not be considered a contraindication for ICI therapy.

Chronic Hepatitis C: Acute Exacerbation and Alanine Aminotransferase Flare

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes acute and chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as extrahepatic manifestations such as malignant lymphoma. Currently, direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) against HCV infection can lead to a sustained virological response (SVR) in almost all HCV-infected patients. In this review article, we discuss acute exacerbation and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare in patients with chronic HCV infection. Although acute liver failure caused by HCV infection is rare, careful attention should be paid to the cases with ALT elevation during the natural course of chronic HCV infection. HCV genotype 2 infection, the use of rituximab, and a higher dose of corticosteroid are factors associated with HCV acute exacerbation and ALT flare. Treatment regimens for cancer have been interrupted or changed due to ALT flare due to HCV infection in some patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. The pathogenesis of HCV acute exacerbation and ALT flare could involve cellular as well as humoral immune responses. In the DAA era, the earlier introduction of DAAs may prevent chronic HCV-infected patients with acute exacerbation and ALT flare from developing into a more severe form, although DAAs may not be effective for all of them.

The impact of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of HCV and occult HBV among newly diagnosed pre-treatment Egyptian lymphoma patients and evaluate patients' outcomes based on the presence of the viral infections.

METHODS

The study included 80 therapy-naïve lymphoma patients including 71 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 9 Hodgkin lymphoma disease (HD) in addition to 100 healthy volunteers. HBV screening using HBsAg and anti-HBc IgM and HCV using AB/Ag ELISA and real-time RT-PCR were screened in tested and control groups. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were conducted to diseased patients.

RESULTS

Healthy patients showed 4/100, (4%) active HCV infection and 1/100, (1%) active HBV infection and no occult HBV infection. Among NHL patients, 28 were positive for HBV (6 active and 22 occult HBV infection). Occult HBV was also detected in 5/9 HD patients. HCV was detected in (30/71, 42.3%) of NHL patients and in a single HD patient. Ten occult HBV NHL patients showed a mixed infection with HCV. The incidence of both HCV and HBV are higher in NHL than HL patients. After antitumor treatment, complete remission for lymphoma was achieved in 45% of patients. Both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were correlated and significantly associated with patients' LDH levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings claim the suggestive role of HCV and occult HBV infections in NHL but not HL patients in comparison to healthy control, suggesting pre-screening of related factors including occult HBV in for potential better therapy response.

Hepatotoxicity during legacy cancer chemotherapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The rates and causes of significant hepatotoxicity with cancer chemotherapy (CCT) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We compared rates of grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, defined as elevated transaminases, during CCT in patients who are mono-infected with HCV compared with rates in controls matched on demographics, diagnosis, and rituximab use. We excluded patients with hepatobiliary cancers, hepatitis B virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Hepatotoxicity was attributed to a medical cause, cancer progression, or CCT, including HCV flare.

RESULTS

Patients with HCV (n = 196) had a higher rate of cirrhosis than the 1,130 matched controls (21.9% versus 4%; P <0.001). Their higher rate of overall hepatotoxicity (8.7% versus 4.5% of controls, P = 0.01) was due to higher rate of CCT-related hepatotoxicity (4.1% versus 1.2%, P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the largest risk factor for overall hepatotoxicity was cirrhosis, and the only risk factor for CCT-related hepatotoxicity was HCV infection. Among those with HCV, the only significant risk factor for hepatotoxicity was rituximab use. Hepatotoxicity caused by CCT delayed or altered treatment in only 3 HCV patients and 1 control (1.5% versus 0.1%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with HCV can safely be treated with cancer chemotherapy. Cirrhosis and HCV infection contributed to increased hepatotoxicity in subjects on CCT. Among HCV patients, rituximab use was the major risk factor for increased hepatotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity due to CCT itself rarely altered or delayed CCT. Nonetheless, HCV-positive patients should be monitored carefully during CCT.

A case of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C during the course of adrenal Cushing's syndrome

A 50-year-old woman with adrenal Cushing's syndrome and chronic hepatitis C developed an acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C before adrenectomy. After administration of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was started, her transaminase levels normalized promptly and a rapid virological response also was achieved. Laparoscopic left adrenectomy was then performed safely.

Screening and prevention of hepatitis C virus reactivation during chemotherapy

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation occurs in 23% of HCV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Forty-three percent of the patients with reactivation of HCV during chemotherapy develop a hepatitis flare. Most of the cancer patients with HCV reactivation have an unremarkable clinical course following an HCV-related hepatitis flare during chemotherapy. However, 26%-57% of the cancer patients developing an acute flare of chronic hepatitis C during chemotherapy require unanticipated discontinuation or dose reduction of chemotherapy, which results in deleterious changes in the cancer treatment plan. Although an optimal strategy for HCV screening in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy has not been established, universal pre-chemotherapy HCV testing for patients with hematological malignancies is recommended by current guidelines. All the currently approved direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) can be used in cancer patients, but the use of DAAs during chemotherapy should avoid drug-drug interactions between chemotherapy and antiviral agents. If there are no contraindications or anticipated drug-drug interactions, DAAs treatment can be administered before, during, or after chemotherapy. In conclusion, HCV reactivation occurs in approximately one-fourth of HCV-infected cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. An HCV-related hepatitis flare during chemotherapy may lead to the discontinuation of potentially life-saving chemotherapy. Currently, universal HCV screening is recommended in hematological malignancy patients before chemotherapy, but there is no evidence-based guideline for other cancer patients. DAAs treatment can cure HCV infection and prevent HCV reactivation during chemotherapy.

Fatal Hepatitis C after Chemotherapy in a Patient with Malignant Lymphoma: Possible Reactivation of Seronegative Occult Hepatitis C Virus Infection Due to Chemotherapy

A 79-year-old man with lymphoma who tested negative for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody received rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Liver dysfunction of unknown cause had persisted since the second cycle of chemotherapy. Ten months after treatment, he rapidly developed massive ascites and atrophy of the liver, and we detected HCV RNA in his serum using real time polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, medical interviews showed that the patient had no episodes for acute HCV infection, but he did have a history of unspecified liver dysfunction. These findings support the possibility of the reactivation of seronegative occult HCV infection due to chemotherapy in a cancer patient.

Tacrolimus for Treating Orbital and Cranial Form of Idiopathic Inflammatory Pseudotumors

Background and Purpose

Orbital and cranial form of idiopathic inflammatory pseudotumors (IIPs) are rare disorders with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Corticosteroids have been the first-line treatment for IIPs, but they are not always effective.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of three patients with orbital or cranial form of IIP who were treated with tacrolimus as an adjuvant treatment.

Results

The three patients showed favorable outcomes with the addition of tacrolimus, which is a calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits T-cell activation and T-cell-dependent B-cell activation.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus may be a safe and effective immunosuppressant for refractory or relapsing form of orbital or cranial IIPs.

Oncologic Implications of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increases the risk for several types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as primary and second primary malignancies. HCV-infected patients with cancer, particularly those undergoing anticancer therapy, are at risk for development of enhanced HCV replication, which can lead to hepatitis flare and progression of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Risk factors for HCV infection include injection drug use, blood transfusion, or solid organ transplantation before 1992, receipt of clotting factor concentrates before 1987, long-term hemodialysis, chronic liver disease, HIV positivity, and occupational exposure. Widely available direct-acting antivirals are highly effective against HCV and well tolerated. Identification of HCV-infected individuals is the essential first step in treatment and eradication of the infection. One-time screening is recommended for persons born from 1945 to 1965; screening is also recommended for persons with risk factors. Recently, a public health recommendation has been drafted to screen all adults age 18 to 79 years. Two oncology organizations recommend screening all patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, and a recently published multicenter prospective study supports universal HCV screening for all patients with cancer. HCV screening entails testing for anti-HCV antibodies in serum and, when results are positive, HCV RNA quantitation to confirm infection. Direct-acting antiviral therapy eradicates HCV in almost all cases. Virologic cure of HCV prevents chronic hepatitis and progression to liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. HCV eradication also decreases the risk of developing HCV-associated primary and second primary malignancies, and it may allow HCV-infected patients access to important cancer clinical trials. Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis require lifelong surveillance for HCC, even after viral eradication.

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on recent studies of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in cancer patients with an emphasis on viral reactivation after cancer treatment, new antiviral therapies, and safety concerns.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic criteria for HBV reactivation in patients receiving cancer therapy were revised in 2018. HBV reactivation in these patients is preventable, even with the use of new cancer therapies. HCV reactivation also has been reported in cancer patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies, and is not a virologic condition usually associated with poor outcome. Prophylaxis to prevent HCV reactivation is not recommended because therapy with direct-acting antivirals eradicates the infection in the majority of cancer patients.

SUMMARY

Cancer patients with HBV or HCV infection are at risk for viral reactivation, with many similarities between these two infections. Patients at high risk for reactivation will benefit significantly from taking oral antivirals, which will reduce the risk of HBV reactivation or prevent development of HCV reactivation following its virologic cure.

Hepatitis C virus infection and non-hepatocellular malignancies in the DAA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Direct antiviral agents have greatly improved therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis C. Indeed, former "difficult-to-treat" patients can now be treated and can achieve sustained response. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma and with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Other malignancies have been reported to be associated with HCV infection albeit with various grades of evidence. Antineoplastic treatment is often reduced or suspended in HCV-positive cancer patients to avoid "HCV reactivation." In this setting, antiviral therapy combined with antineoplastic protocols may improve the outcome. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to update the association between HCV infection and non-hepatocellular malignancies, and to shed light on the effects exerted by antiviral treatment on the natural history of oncological diseases.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by searching PUBMED, EMBASE and MEDLINE up to 1 August 2018. Pooled risk estimates were calculated with random-effects models according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 58 studies were included in the analysis: 27 studies of the association between HCV and B-NHL(OR 3.36; 95% CI 2.40-4.72;P < 0.00001);13 studies of the association between sustained virological response and progression-free survival (PFS) in B-NHL patients(OR 9.34; 95% CI 4.90-17.79; P < 0.00001); 13 studies of the association between HCV and intrahepatic-cholangio-carcinoma (OR 3.95;95% CI 2.25-6.94; P < 0.00001); and 5 studies of the association between HCV infection and pancreatic adeno-carcinoma(OR 1.60; 95% CI:1.25-2.04; P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study updates the strong association between B-NHL and HCV infection, confirms the association between HCV and non-hepatocellular tumours, and demonstrates a very strong association between viral eradication and a better outcome of HCV-positive B-NHL.

Hepatic Manifestations of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Hepatic abnormalities in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders are common and can occur from direct infiltration by abnormal cells, bile duct obstruction, paraneoplastic syndrome, hemophagocytic syndrome, drug-induced liver injury, opportunistic infections, and reactivation of viral hepatitis. Hepatic involvement by lymphoma is often in association with systemic disease and rarely seen as a primary hepatic lymphoma. Vanishing bile duct syndrome is a well-known complication of Hodgkin disease. Antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is recommended for all HBsAg⁺ patients undergoing chemotherapy and all resolved HBV patients undergoing rituximab therapy and stem cell transplantation.

Hepatitis B and C Virus Reactivation Patterns in a Romanian Cohort of Patients with Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV) reactivations have become more common following the intensive use of biological therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (CLD). We evaluate risk factors for virus reactivation and exitus in patients diagnosed with CLD and HBV or HCV infection, undergoing rituximab-chemotherapy (R-chemo). A prospective, observational study in two tertiary-care Romanian hospitals, between December 2007 and May 2010, of patients diagnosed with CLD undergoing R-chemo. HBV and HCV serological markers, viral load, fibrosis and necroinflammation were assessed at baseline and every 3-6 months. We screened 502 patients diagnosed with CLDs (77.2% non-Hodgkin lymphomas) and enrolled 57 patients with HBV and/or HCV infection with a mean age of 61.35 ± 11.1 years. The replicative virus was HBV in 23 patients (40.3%), HCV in 33 patients (57.9%). HCV reactivation rate (15.6%) was lower than for HBV (45.5%) (p = 0.02). In univariate analysis, viral reactivation was associated with aggressive CLD (p = 0.01), HBV (p = 0.01) and lymphopenia (p = 0.02). Death was associated with aggressive CLD (p = 0.01), viral reactivation (p = 0.001) and high baseline viremia (p = 0.05). In multivariate analysis, viral reactivation was associated with lymphopenia (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.003-0.85, p = 0.03). Risk of death was 10 times higher for patients with viral reactivation (95% CI 1.54-65.5, p = 0.01). A quarter of the infected patients were diagnosed with viral reactivation. While hepatitis C was more prevalent than hepatitis B in patients with CLD, viral reactivation was found 3 times more frequently in patients with hepatitis B than C.

Interferon-free treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C and autoimmune liver disease: higher SVR rates with special precautions for deterioration of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Interferon-free treatment can achieve higher sustained virological response (SVR) rates, even in patients in whom hepatitis C virus (HCV) could not be eradicated in the interferon treatment era. Immune restoration in the liver is occasionally associated with HCV infection. We examined the safety and effects of interferon-free regimens on HCV patients with autoimmune liver diseases.

RESULTS

All 7 HCV patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) completed treatment and achieved SVR. Three patients took prednisolone (PSL) at baseline, and 3 did not take PSL during interferon-free treatment. In one HCV patient with AIH and cirrhosis, PSL were not administered at baseline, but she needed to take 40 mg/day PSL at week 8 for liver dysfunction. She also complained back pain and was diagnosed with vasospastic angina by coronary angiography at week 11. However, she completed interferon-free treatment. All 5 HCV patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) completed treatment and achieved SVR. Three of these HCV patients with PBC were treated with UDCA during interferon-free treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-free regimens could result in higher SVR rates in HCV patients with autoimmune liver diseases. As interferon-free treatment for HCV may have an effect on hepatic immunity and activity of the autoimmune liver diseases, careful attention should be paid to unexpected adverse events in their treatments.

METHODS

Total 12 patients with HCV and autoimmune liver diseases [7 AIH and PBC], who were treated with interferon-free regimens, were retrospectively analyzed.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis in the hematological patient

INTRODUCTION

Infection with HBV and HCV represents a growing challenge in the management of patients with hematological malignancies. Recently, hepatitis E (HEV) was recognized as an endemic infection in developed countries and as an emerging health problem in immunocompromised patients. Areas covered: We reviewed the current knowledge on the impact of chronic viral hepatitis in the hematological setting. Epidemiological features, screening strategies and indications for treatment and monitoring have been explored and commented. Expert commentary: Knowing patient's complete HBV serostatus is mandatory in order to choose between treatment, prophylaxis or a pre-emptive approach. Recent guidelines favor treatment with high barrier molecules in all patients with chronic HBV infection and long lasting prophylaxis with those with inactive or resolved one. With regard to HCV, the new direct-acting antiviral agents have been safely administered in the hematological setting. Their use as first-line single treatment in indolent lymphomas, and combined with chemotherapy in aggressive ones, should be considered. Due to the existing risk of chronic HEV infection in the immunocompromised, screening with serum HEV-RNA should be performed in case of signs and symptoms indicative of hepatitis. In the event of HEV infection, reduction of immunosuppression and, if not feasible or unsuccessful, ribavirin treatment should be prescribed.

Hepatitis C virus reactivation in patients receiving cancer treatment: A prospective observational study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation in patients receiving cancer treatment has been reported in retrospective studies. We sought to determine prospectively the incidence, predictors, and clinical significance of HCV reactivation during cancer treatment. HCV-infected patients receiving cancer treatment at our institution between November 2012 and July 2016 were studied. Reactivation was defined as an increase in HCV-RNA ≥1 log10 IU/mL over baseline and hepatitis flare as an increase in alanine aminotransferase to ≥3 times the upper limit of normal. One hundred patients were studied, 50 with hematologic malignancies and 50 with solid tumors. Reactivation occurred in 23 (23%) patients, including 18 (36%) patients with hematologic malignancies and 5 (10%) patients with solid tumors. In univariate analysis, patients with reactivation were more likely than those without reactivation to have prolonged lymphopenia (median, 95 versus 22 days; P = 0.01) and to have received rituximab (44% versus 9%; P < 0.0001), bendamustine (22% versus 0%; P < 0.001), high-dose steroids (57% versus 21%; P = 0.001), or purine analogs (22% versus 5%; P = 0.02). Rituximab (odds ratio = 9.52; P = 0.001), and high-dose steroids (odds ratio = 5.05; P = 0.01) retained significance in multivariable analysis. Of the 23 patients with reactivation, 10 (43%) had hepatitis flare. No patient with reactivation experienced liver failure or liver-related death within 36 weeks after initiation of cancer treatment. Fourteen patients with hepatitis flare, six of whom had reactivation, required discontinuation or dose reduction of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

HCV reactivation occurred in 23% of HCV-infected patients receiving cancer treatment, and most had an unremarkable clinical course. However, reactivation can affect the cancer treatment plan. Our findings suggest that HCV infection should not contraindicate cancer therapy and infected patients should have access to multiple cancer treatments with close monitoring while receiving regimens associated with HCV reactivation. (Hepatology 2018;67:36-47).

Reactivation of Hepatitis C Virus and Its Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy or Immunosuppressive Therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

According to the results of several studies, the outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation is not as severe as the outcome of hepatitis B virus reactivation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacological immunosuppression on HCV reactivation.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy, corticosteroid therapy, or other immunosuppressive therapies between January 2008 and March 2015 were reviewed. Subsequently, 202 patients who were seropositive for the anti-HCV antibody were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were: unavailability of data on HCV RNA levels, a history of treatment for chronic hepatitis C, and the presence of liver diseases other than a chronic HCV infection.

RESULTS

Among the 120 patients enrolled in this study, hepatitis was present in 46 patients (38%). None of the patients were diagnosed with severe hepatitis. Enhanced replication of HCV was noted in nine (27%) of the 33 patients who had data available on both basal and follow-up HCV RNA loads. Reappearance of the HCV RNA from an undetectable state did not occur after treatment. The cumulative rate of enhanced HCV replication was 23% at 1 year and 30% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although enhanced HCV replication is relatively common in HCV-infected patients treated with chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy, it does not lead to serious sequelae.

The oncologic burden of hepatitis C virus infection: A clinical perspective

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects millions of people worldwide and is associated with cancer. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have changed HCV treatment paradigms, but little is known about the management of HCV infection in patients with cancer. The substantial burden of HCV infection and the inconclusive evidence regarding its detection and management in patients with cancer prompted the authors to review the literature and formulate recommendations. Patients for whom HCV screening is recommended included all patients with hematologic malignancies, hematopoietic cell transplantation candidates, and patients with liver cancer. There is a lack of consensus-based recommendations for the identification of HCV-infected patients with other types of cancer, but physicians may at least consider screening patients who belong to groups at heightened risk of HCV infection, including those born during 1945 through 1965 and those at high risk for infection. Patients with evidence of HCV infection should be assessed by an expert to evaluate liver disease severity, comorbidities associated with HCV infection, and treatment opportunities. DAA therapy should be tailored on the basis of patient prognosis, type of cancer, cancer treatment plan, and hepatic and virologic parameters. HCV-infected patients with cancer who have cirrhosis (or even advanced fibrosis) and those at risk for liver disease progression, especially patients with HCV-associated comorbidities, should have ongoing follow-up, regardless of whether there is a sustained virologic response, to ensure timely detection and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV infection and its treatment should not be considered contraindications to cancer treatment and should not delay the initiation of an urgent cancer therapy. CA Cancer J Clin 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:411-431. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Hepatitis C virus and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: A minireview

B-cell NHL is strongly associated with HCV that was proved in the last 2 decades. The most common HCV infection related B-NHL subtypes include MZL and DLBCL lymphomas. HCV-positive NHL patients usually present with older age at diagnosis, higher LDH, and more extranodal disease. The standard chemo-immunotherapy tolerance is generally good. Antiviral treatment achieves virological and hematological remission in HCV associated indolent lymphoma. More aggressive lymphoma requires combination of antiviral treatment and chemotherapy. New generation of HCV antiviral drugs is safe and is highly efficacious. Regimens including DAAs appear promising options as they can reduce the HCV-associated NHL incidence by dramatically lowering the HCV chronic carriers.

Treatment of Hepatitis C in Patients Undergoing Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy

With 185 million people chronically infected globally, hepatitis C is a leading bloodborne infection. All-oral regimens of direct acting agents have superior efficacy compared to the historical interferon-based regimens and are significantly more tolerable. However, trials of both types of regimens have often excluded patients on immunosuppressive medications for reasons other than organ transplantation. Yet, these patients-most often suffering from malignancy or autoimmune diseases-could stand to benefit from these treatments. In this study, we systematically review the literature on the treatment of hepatitis C in these neglected populations. Research on patients with organ transplants is more robust and this literature is reviewed here non-systematically. Our systematic review produced 2273 unique works, of which 56 met our inclusion criteria and were used in our review. The quality of data was low; only 3 of the 56 studies were randomized controlled trials. Sustained virologic response was reported sporadically. Interferon-containing regimens achieved this end-point at rates comparable to that in immunocompetent individuals. Severe adverse effects and death were rare. Data on all-oral regimens were sparse, but in the most robust study, rates of sustained virologic response were again comparable to immunocompetent individuals (40/41). Efficacy and safety of interferon-containing regimens and all-oral regimens were similar to rates in immunocompetent individuals; however, there were few interventional trials. The large number of case reports and case series makes conclusions vulnerable to publication bias. While firm conclusions are challenging, given the dearth of high-quality studies, our results demonstrate that antiviral therapy can be safe and effective. The advent of all-oral regimens offers patients and clinicians greatly increased chances of cure and fewer side effects. Preliminary data reveal that these regimens may confer such benefits in immunosuppressed individuals as well. More prospective interventional trials would greatly benefit the many patients with chronic hepatitis C on immunosuppressive therapies.

How I treat hepatitis C virus infection in patients with hematologic malignancies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not uncommon in cancer patients. Over the past 5 years, treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients with hematologic malignancies has evolved rapidly as safe and effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have become the standard-of-care treatment. Today, chronic HCV infection should not prevent a patient from receiving cancer therapy or participating in clinical trials of chemotherapy because most infected patients can achieve virologic cure. Elimination of HCV from infected cancer patients confers virologic, hepatic, and oncologic advantages. Similar to the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients without cancer, the optimal therapy for HCV-infected patients with cancer is evolving rapidly. The choice of regimens with DAAs should be individualized after thorough assessment for potential hematologic toxic effects and drug-drug interactions. This study presents clinical scenarios of HCV-infected patients with hematologic malignancies, focusing on diagnosis, clinical and laboratory presentations, complications, and DAA therapy. An up-to-date treatment algorithm is presented.

Acute exacerbation of hepatitis C in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy

Acute hepatitis C exacerbations can occur in cancer patients carrying hepatitis C virus (HCV) when receiving systemic chemotherapy. However, clinical studies evaluating these complications remain rare due to the lack of clinically proven effective and tolerable anti-HCV treatments at late cancer stages. Furthermore, no data were available regarding hepatitis C exacerbation in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving chemotherapy. To address this issue, 48 patients with HCV-related advanced HCC, who underwent systemic chemotherapy using 5- fluorouracil, cisplatin, and mitoxantrone from 2008 to 2014 were analyzed. Nine patients developed acute hepatitis exacerbations defined by HCV-RNA elevation ≥10-fold and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation ≥5-fold of the upper normal limit. Six were genotype 1b and 3 were genotype 2. Three patterns of clinical courses were observed including single episode of exacerbation (n = 5), fluctuated flares (n = 3), and delayed exacerbation (n = 1). Hepatic failure developed in five patients. Patients with acute exacerbations were less likely to have pretreatment ascites (11.1% vs. 53.8%; P = 0.028) and displayed a lower baseline ALT (44.1 ± 28.5 U/L vs. 72.6 ± 19.2 U/L; P = 0.007). Paradoxically, despite a high risk of hepatic failure, occurrence of hepatitis C exacerbation was associated with a favorable overall survival (P = 0.027; 22.8 vs. 5.4 months). In conclusion, hepatitis C exacerbation can occur in HCC patients receiving chemotherapy, leading to liver failure. However, the flare was associated with a better overall survival, possibly due to its association with a better baseline liver function. J. Med. Virol. 89:153-160, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C and sensibility of a selective screening questionnaire in patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B or C virus can occur in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Recommendations for selective or systematic hepatitis B virus testing prior chemotherapy for solid tumors differ. The primary aim was to determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis B or C in a low endemic country. The second objective was to assess the relevance of a questionnaire on hepatitis B/C risk factors to consider a selective screening.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively tested for hepatitis B/C markers. HBs antigen positive patients and isolated anti-HBc positive patients with detectable viral load received antiviral preventive treatment. Patients or physicians completed the questionnaire on infection risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 450 patients included, 388 were tested for all serological markers and had gastrointestinal (63.7%), lung (31.2%) and skin (4.6%) cancers. The prevalence of subjects exposed to hepatitis B virus was 8.5% (33/388). One patient tested positive for HBs antigen and received preventive treatment. Prevalence of subjects exposed to hepatitis C was 1.3% (5/388). The questionnaire sensitivity was 45.5%, 100% and 50% for detecting carriers of hepatitis B, C and one or the other, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seroprevalence of hepatitis B was low. Selective screening with the questionnaire was insufficiently sensitive. Systematic screening with serological tests prior to chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors is therefore relevant.

Incidence and antiviral response of hepatitis C virus reactivation in lupus patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy

Objective

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease and usually requires immunosuppressive therapy, which is a major cause of viral reactivation. The incidence and antiviral response in SLE patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation is unclear and needs to be investigated.

Methods

One hundred and sixty-six SLE patients with antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) status were retrospectively reviewed regarding the events of HCV reactivation. Patients with HCV reactivation were treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment. The virological response and relapse rate were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-six patients were positive for anti-HCV. During a mean 8.4 years of follow-up, 10 (38.5%) cases developed HCV reactivation. No clear relationship was noted between immunosuppressive therapy and the HCV reactivation. Eight patients underwent antiviral therapy and the rapid virological response (RVR), early virological response, and sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 37.5%, 87.5%, and 75.0%, respectively. However, late relapse (reappearance of HCV RNA in serum after archiving SVR) was found in two (33.3%) of six patients achieving SVR. The two cases were HCV genotype 1 b concurrent with corticosteroid treatment.

Conclusions

HCV reactivation in anti-HCV-positive SLE patients was possibly associated with glucocorticoids. The virological response to interferon plus ribavirin treatment is not inferior to the general population. However, monitoring HCV RNA after SVR is necessary for patients concurrent with corticosteroid treatment due to the risk of late relapse.

Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Reactivation in the Biologic Era

Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) reactivation may occur after the use of biologic agents. During the last decade, utilization of biologics has changed the fate of many treated for cancer, autoimmune and connective tissue disease, maintenance of transplanted organs, and the prevention of graft-versus-host disease among others. HBV reactivation has been reported in up to 50% of HBV carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, and there is emerging data pointing towards an increased risk for HCV reactivation. If reactivation of HBV and HCV occurs, the spectrum of clinical manifestations can range from asymptomatic hepatitis flares to hepatic decompensation, fulminant hepatic failure, and death. Therefore, identifying patients at risk and early diagnosis are imperative to decrease significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to review the pathophysiology of the reactivation of HBV and HCV infection in patients receiving biologic therapies and the approaches used to diagnose, prevent, and treat HBV and HCV reactivation.

Hepatitis B and C seroprevalence in solid tumors - necessity for screening during chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B and C are the leading causes of liver diseases worldwide. For hematological and solid malignancy patients undergoing chemotherapy, increases in HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels can be detected which may result in reactivation and hepatitis-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of Hbs ag and Anti HCV positivity in patients with solid malignancies undergoing chemotherapy and consequences during follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of 914 patients with solid malignancies whose hepatitis markers were determined serologically at diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy. For the cases with HBV and/or HCV positivity, HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels, liver function tests at diagnosis and during follow-up and the treatment modalities that were chosen were determined.

RESULTS

Of 914 cases, Hbs Ag, anti Hbs and anti HCV positivity were detected in 40 (4.4%), 336 (36.8%) and 26 (2.8%) of the cases respectively. All of the Hbs ag positive patients received prophylactic lamuvidine before the start of chemotherapy. In the Hbs ag and anti HCV positive cases, liver failure was not detected during chemotherapy and a delay in chemotherapy courses because of hepatitis was not encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Just as with hematological malignancies, screening for HBV and HCV should also be considered for patients with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy. Prophylactic antiviral therapy for HBV reduces both the reactivation rates and HBV related mortality and morbidity. The clinical impact of HCV infection on patients undergoing chemotherapy is still not well characterized.

Hepatitis C virus reactivation in cancer patients in the era of targeted therapies

The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence of hepatitis C reactivation in cancer patients in the era of targeted therapies. Targeted therapies are novel therapeutics frequently used in cancer patients. During treatment with targeted therapies, viral replication is one of the major problems that can occur. The PubMed database, ASCO, and ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium abstracts were searched up until September 15, 2013 using the following search keywords: “targeted therapies, rituximab, alemtuzumab, brentuximab, hepatitis, hepatitis C reactivation, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus, anti-HER therapies, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies, cetuximab, panitumumab, and ipilimumab”. Papers considered relevant for the aim of this review were selected by the authors. The data about rituximab-induced hepatic flare in hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive patients is controversial. However, there is the possibility of life-threatening hepatic flare that can develop after HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) viral load increases. Routine follow-up of liver function tests should be advised. Especially in high-risk patients, such as those with baseline chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis, and where there are plans to administer rituximab concomitantly with corticosteroids, it is advised to have close follow-up of HCV viral load. The data is insufficient to make accurate statements about the association of alemtuzumab therapy and HCV reactivation. However, alemtuzumab may cause deep immunosuppression. Due to this, it is better to follow up with liver function tests and HCV RNA levels during alemtuzumab therapy. Brentuximab has effects on antibody dependent cellular toxicity and may decrease humoral immunity. Thus, we believe that during brentuximab treatment of HCV infected patients, clinicians may encounter hepatitis C reactivation. There have been no reported cases of hepatitis C reactivation with imatinib therapy. However, there are many reports of hepatitis B reactivation with imatinib treatment. Based on the evidence of hepatitis B reactivation with imatinib and the effects of imatinib on immune system functions, we suggest that imatinib therapy might be a risk factor for HCV reactivation. Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapies are not associated with hepatic flare in HCV infected patients. Post-transplant studies reported that mTOR was safely administered to patients with active hepatitis C without causing hepatic flare. Cetuximab and panitumumab have not been associated with HCV reactivation. Two cases of HCV infected melanoma were safely treated with ipilimumab without any HCV reactivation or hepatic flare. Targeted therapies are a new and emerging area of oncology treatment modalities. While treating HCV infected cancer patients, clinicians should be mindful of the immunosuppressive properties of targeted therapies. Further randomized trials are needed to establish algorithms for this issue.

Liver abnormalities in the immunosuppressed

The immunosuppressed state may arise due to medical illness or drug therapy, which can result in a diverse array of liver derangements. This article discusses the commonly-encountered immunosuppressed conditions and the associated specific liver diseases. Due to the frequency of blood-borne viral disease globally, viral hepatitis (hepatitis B and C) during chemotherapy, transplantation and the increasingly utilised biological therapies for autoimmune disorders is discussed. An overview of human immunodeficiency virus co-infection with hepatitis B and C is provided. This article aims to highlight the variety of liver diseases which can occur in clinically relevant, particularly iatrogenic, immunosuppressed conditions, and summarise learning and practice points for clinicians. Recognition and prevention of viral liver disease is crucial and early involvement of experts prior to administration of immunosuppressive therapy is advised.

Fatal Acute Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Patients in hematology units are at risk of hepatitis C virus infection. In these patients acute infection is reportedly mild, presents only moderately increased ALT levels, is characterized by a significant delay in anti-HCV seroconversion and does not influence the course of the underlying disease. We describe two fatal cases of acute HCV infection occurring in patients with hematologic malignancies and we hypothesize that, in a subset of immunocompromised patients, acute HCV infection may play a still unrecognized but not marginal role in contributing to death. Prospective studies are needed to define the frequency of fatal acute HCV infection among hematologic patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Impact of hepatitis C virus infection on clinical outcome in recipients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a matter of debate. We have retrospectively examined the significance of HCV infection among recipients who received allogeneic HCT, using a Japan transplant outcome registry database between 2006 and 2009. Among 7,831 recipients, 136 were HCV-positive. The rate of hematopoietic recovery was lower in the HCV-positive group (neutrophil recovery of 500 × 10(6) /L or higher: 79% vs. 87% at Day 30, P = 0.087; platelet recovery of 50 × 10(9) /L or higher: 57% vs. 65% at Day 60, P = 0.012). The HCV-positive group had a significantly higher incidence of nonrelapse mortality 38% vs. 25% at 2 years, P < 0.01) and inferior overall survival (41% vs. 51% at 2 years, P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis revealed that HCV seropositivity was associated with an independent risk for higher nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio: 1.65, P < 0.01) and inferior overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.39, P < 0.01). The incidences of death due to hepatic problems (8% vs. 2%, P < 0.01), bacterial infection (10% vs. 4%, P < 0.01), or graft failure (5% vs. 2%, P = 0.084) tended to be higher in the HCV-positive group. HCV infection had an adverse impact on the clinical outcome following HCT, especially in the setting of unrelated transplantation. Careful evaluation before embarking on HCT and intensive assessment against complications are warranted in HCV-infected recipients.

Reactivation of hepatitis viruses following immunomodulating systemic chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following anticancer chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy is a well-known complication. HBV reactivation has been reported to be associated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab-containing chemotherapy and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor-containing immunosuppressive therapy in HBV resolved patients (hepatitis B surface antigen negative and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen positive and/or antibodies against surface antigen positive). On the other hand, HCV reactivation has been reported to be associated with liver damage or hepatic dysfunction, but fulminant hepatitis due to HCV reactivation is a rare complication. In this review, we describe the pathophysiology of the reactivation of HBV and HCV infection, as well as the clinical evidence and management of HCV reactivation.

Acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in cancer patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data on acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following chemotherapy are very limited. We sought to characterize the episodes of acute exacerbation and viral reactivation of HCV infection in cancer patients.

METHODS

The medical records of HCV-infected patients seen at our institution (2008-2009) were analyzed retrospectively. Acute exacerbation was defined as greater than 3-fold increase in serum level of alanine aminotransferase, and viral reactivation as ≥ 1 log(10) IU/ml increase of HCV viral load following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Acute exacerbation occurred in 33 (11%) of 308 patients with proven HCV infection. Patients with acute exacerbation more often had underlying hematological malignancies (73% vs. 29%; p<0.001) and lymphopenia (6% vs. 0%; p=0.01) than patients without it. In multivariate analysis, underlying hematological malignancies (p=0.02; odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7) and use of rituximab (p=0.004; odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-10.9) were associated with acute exacerbation. Patients with acute exacerbation received higher median cumulative dose of rituximab than those without exacerbation. Discontinuation of chemotherapy due to liver dysfunction was more common in patients with acute exacerbation than in patients without it (45% vs. 11%; p<0.001). Eight (36%) of 22 patients with known pre- and post-chemotherapy viral load had viral reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic HCV infection occur often after chemotherapy. Liver dysfunction can lead to discontinuation of potentially life-saving chemotherapy in nearly one-half of the patients with exacerbation of HCV infection.

Pathogenetic mechanisms of hepatitis C virus-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is probably the most common chronic viral infection and affects an estimated 180 million people worldwide, accounting for 3% of the global population. Although the liver is considered to be the primary target, extrahepatic manifestations are well recognized among patients with chronic HCV infection. Epidemiological studies have clearly demonstrated a correlation between chronic HCV infection and occurrence of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHL). The clinical evidence that antiviral therapy has a significant role in the treatment at least of some HCV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders, especially indolent B-NHL, further supports the existence of an etiopathogenetic link. However, the mechanisms exploited by HCV to induce B-cell lymphoproliferation have so far not completely clarified. It is conceivable that different biological mechanisms, namely, chronic antigen stimulation, high-affinity interaction between HCV-E2 protein and its cellular receptors, direct HCV infection of B-cells, and "hit and run" transforming events, may be combined themselves and cooperate in a multifactorial model of HCV-associated lymphomagenesis.

‘Les liaisons dangereuses’: Hepatitis C, Rituximab and B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas

Rituximab has provided a revolutionary contribution to the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL). A high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been described in B-cell NHL patients. Cases of liver dysfunction in HCV-positive patients have been reported with Rituximab-containing regimens. In this paper we review the recent data regarding the effects of Rituximab in NHL patients with HCV infection. We also added a section devoted to improving communication between oncohaematologists and hepatologists. Furthermore, we propose a common methodological ground to study hepatic toxicity emerging during chemotherapy.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in patients with cancer

Infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer, especially in patients with hematologic malignancies and those who undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Reported rates of HBV reactivation in HBV carriers who undergo chemotherapy range from 14-72%. In these patients, mortality rates range from 5-52%. HCV reactivation seems to be less common than HBV reactivation and is usually associated with a good outcome and low mortality. However, once severe hepatitis develops, as a result of viral reactivation, mortality rates seem to be similar among patients infected with HBV or HCV. Liver damage owing to viral reactivation frequently leads to modifications or interruptions of chemotherapy, which can negatively affect patients' clinical outcome. Risk factors for the development of severe HBV or HCV reactivation need to be better defined to permit identification of patients who may benefit from preventive measures, early diagnosis, and therapy. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical and laboratory manifestations associated with reactivation of HBV and HCV during immunosuppressive therapy. We also discuss strategies for the prevention and treatment of viral reactivation, including the management of reactivation with new antiviral agents.

Differences in the patterns and outcomes of enhanced viral replication between hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during transarterial chemolipiodolization

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Enhanced replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is well described in the setting of moderate to severe immunosuppression. The aims of this retrospective study were to determine the incidence of enhanced HCV replication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing transarterial chemolipiodolization (TACL) and to identify the factors associated with enhanced replication of HCV. The clinical pattern of enhanced HCV replication was compared with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during TACL.

METHODS

This study enrolled 49 anti-HCV-seropositive patients who were diagnosed with HCC between January 2005 and December 2010 and who underwent TACL using epirubicin and/or cisplatin with consecutive HCV RNA copies checked. For comparison, 46 hepatitis B surface antigen(1)-positive patients with HCC who were treated with TACL were also enrolled. The frequency, associated factors, and clinical outcomes of enhanced HCV replication were analyzed and compared with those of HBV reactivation during TACL.

RESULTS

Enhanced replication of HCV occurred in 13 (26.5%) of the 49 anti-HCV-seropositive patients during TACL. Of these 13 patients, 4 developed hepatitis, but none of the subjects developed decompensation due to the hepatitis. No significant clinical factors for enhanced HCV replication during TACL were found. Compared with HBV reactivation, the frequency of hepatitis attributed to enhanced HCV replication was significantly lower than that for HBV reactivation (8.2% vs. 23.9%, P=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

TACL can enhance HCV replication; however, the likelihood of hepatitis and decompensation stemming from enhanced HCV replication was lower than that for HBV reactivation in patients undergoing TACL.

Hepatitis C reactivation in patients who have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab: a case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Whether to interrupt or to continue induction therapy for lymphoma when hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation occurs during therapy with rituximab and chemotherapy remains a controversial question. There is limited evidence-based literature to help guide the management of patients with lymphoma in the setting of HCV reactivation. To address this issue we report an illustrative case and review the prevalence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in HCV-infected patients; the role of HCV in lymphomagenesis; the role of antiviral therapy in the management of HCV-associated lymphomas; as well as comparing the outcomes for NHL patients with and without HCV infection.

CASE REPORT

A patient diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was treated with rituximab and chemotherapy with the patient achieving a complete remission, but treatment was complicated by asymptomatic HCV reactivation. Because conflicting data exist regarding management of such cases, the criteria for discontinuing chemotherapy, in the event of escalation in HCV replication in an asymptomatic patient, remain unclear.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCV have increased prevalence of marginal zone lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Whether HCV has a role in the lymphomagenesis is still uncertain, and limited to conjecture. The question whether to treat HCV-related lymphomas with antiviral therapy is debatable and not well-supported. Without initial liver dysfunction, HCV-infected patients can experience a similar outcome compared to their HCV-negative counterparts when treated with standard chemotherapy/immunotherapy despite differences in the presentation of the disease.

Recognition of immune reconstitution syndrome necessary for better management of patients with severe drug eruptions and those under immunosuppressive therapy

The immune reconstitution syndrome (IRS) is an increasingly recognized disease concept and is observed with a broad-spectrum of immunosuppressive therapy-related opportunistic infectious diseases and severe drug eruptions complicated by viral reactivations. Clinical illness consistent with IRS includes tuberculosis, herpes zoster, herpes simples, cytomegalovirus infections and sarcoidosis: thus, the manifestations of this syndrome and diverse and depend on the tissue burden of the preexisting infectious agents during the immunosuppressive state, the nature of the immune system being restored, and underlying diseases of the hosts. Although IRS has originally been reported to occur in the setting of HIV infection, it has become clear that the development of IRS can also be in HIV-negative hosts receiving immunosuppressive agents, such as prednisolone and tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, upon their reduction and withdrawal. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, a life-threatening multiorgan system reaction, is another manifestation of the newly observed IRS. Clinical recognition of the IRS is especially important in improving the outcome for diseases with an otherwise life-threatening progenosis. Clinicians should be aware of the implications of IRS and recognize that relieving the symptoms and signs of immune recovery by anti-inflammatory therapies needs to be balanced with anti-microbial therapies aiming at reducing the amplitude and duration of tissue burden of preexisting microbes.