Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for maintenance treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (PATH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

A phase 2 randomized trial of safety and pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 and IgPro10 in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was the safety of s.c. immunoglobulin, IgPro20 (Hizentra, CSL Behring) in adults with dcSSc. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of IgPro20, and safety and pharmacokinetics of IVIG, IgPro10 (Privigen, CSL Behring).

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover phase 2 study (NCT04137224), patients (aged ≥18 years) with dcSSc were assigned to 16 weeks of IgPro20 (0.5 g/kg/week) followed by 16 weeks of IgPro10 (2 g/kg/4 weeks over two to five sessions), or vice versa. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), infusion site reactions (ISRs), clinical tests, pharmacokinetic and bioavailability were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were randomized from 9 October 2019 to 31 August 2021. In total, 22 patients (81.5%) experienced 107 TEAEs (IgPro20, 49; IgPro10, 58); most were mild/moderate. Six patients (22.2%) experienced 10 SAEs (IgPro20, 6; IgPro10, 4); no treatment-related SAEs and no deaths were reported. IgPro20 ISR rate was low (2 per 100 infusions). Maximum IgG concentration [mean (s.d.)] was numerically lower following IgPro20 [23.7 (1.2) g/l] vs IgPro10 [46.1 (1.2) g/l], as was the geometric mean dose-normalized, baseline-corrected area under the concentration-time curve from time point 0 to tau [IgPro20, 44.8 (1.4) h*g/l; IgPro10, 60.2 (1.4) h*g/l]. The bioavailability of IgPro20 relative to IgPro10 was 76.1%.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in patients with dcSSc, safety, pharmacokinetic and bioavailability profiles of IgPro20, and safety and pharmacokinetics of IgPro10, are similar to those observed in other approved indications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04137224.

Immunoglobulin use in neurology: a practical approach

Human immunoglobulin, delivered either intravenously (IVIg) or subcutaneously, is used to treat a range of immune-mediated neurological disorders. It has a role in acute or subacute inflammatory disease control and as a maintenance therapy in chronic disease management. This review considers mechanisms of IVIg action and the evidence for IVIg in neurological conditions. We use Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) as frameworks to demonstrate an approach to IVIg use in acute and chronic dysimmune neurological conditions across two different healthcare systems: the UK and Australia. We highlight the benefits and limitations of IVIg and focus on practical considerations such as informed consent, managing risks and adverse effects, optimal dosing and monitoring response. We use these basic clinical practice principles to discuss the judicious use of an expensive and scarce blood product with international relevance.

Mycophenolate Facilitates Improvement in Outcome Measures in Treatment Resistant Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a potentially disabling autoimmune neuropathy. Approximately 20% of patients are refractory to first-line treatments necessitating second-line options with limited evidence and potential adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in refractory CIDP.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of MMF plus IVIg ± corticosteroids (MMF cohort, n = 11) versus IVIg only treatment (comparator cohort, n = 33) for CIDP in a single institution is reported. IVIg dosing, day care unit (DCU) utilization, disease specific outcome measures, and adverse events were recorded before and 1 year after MMF initiation.

RESULTS

Median Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS) and Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale logit score (I-RODS) were lower, and DCU utilization was greater, in the MMF cohort than the comparator cohort prior to the introduction of MMF, representing this refractory patient group. Clinical outcomes improved with MMF: median MRC-SS improved from 58 to 68.5 (p = 0.012) and median I-RODS improved from 47 to 78 (p value = 0.028). There was a fiscally meaningful reduction in median IVIg dose and a reduction in DCU utilization from 2.89 days/month to 1.65 days/month (p value = 0.042). Cost savings averaged £38,432 per patient/year. MMF was well tolerated at 1 to 1.5 mg twice daily.

DISCUSSION

MMF is a well-tolerated and potentially effective adjunctive medication in CIDP patients with suboptimal response to first-line therapies. In refractory patients, MMF addition was associated with improvements in outcome measures and meaningful cost reductions. Further trials are required for confirmation.

Feasibility and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin via Manual Push Pre-Filled Syringes for Inflammatory Neuropathies: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is available as vials or pre-filled syringes (PFS) and can be administered via pump or manual push to treat inflammatory neuropathies, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). There are limited data on PFS-SCIG manual push in this population, and this administration method may be perceived as challenging as large volumes of SCIG are required for immunomodulation. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of PFS-manual push SCIG in patients with inflammatory neuropathies.

METHODS

Patients with inflammatory neuropathies receiving immunoglobulin therapy in a single center were identified via the National Immunoglobulin Database. Case notes were retrospectively evaluated for patient characteristics and immunoglobulin use data.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with inflammatory neuropathies being treated with PFS-SCIG were identified (CIDP: n = 29; multifocal motor neuropathy: n = 2; other: n = 5). Overall, 27 patients initiated SCIG with PFS-manual push. The remaining patients initiated SCIG with PFS-pump administration but, during the study, most (n = 7) switched to PFS-manual push, while one switched from PFS-manual push to PFS-pump. Five patients experienced adverse events, mostly associated with infusion-site swelling that could be managed by reducing infusion rates. Patient perception of PFS-manual push was positive, with multiple patients commenting on its convenience.

DISCUSSION

PFS-manual push SCIG appeared to be feasible and generally well-tolerated in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Further studies should confirm PFS-SCIG manual push as a viable option for patients with inflammatory neuropathies and explore whether PFS might enhance treatment satisfaction and quality of life.

A pathophysiological and mechanistic review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy therapy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated disease of the peripheral nerves characterized by proximal and distal muscle weakness and sensory abnormalities. CIDP has been associated with various pathophysiological mechanisms that are not fully understood and that likely differ across groups of patients. It has been proposed that an interplay of different immunopathological mechanisms including the cellular, humoral and complement pathways play a key role in peripheral nerve damage in CIDP. Currently approved treatments and therapies in research often target different potential pathophysiological mechanisms. The efficacy of these different treatments can shed light on the prominence of particular pathophysiological pathways in subsets of patients with CIDP. For example, the complement pathway plays a key role in promoting macrophage-mediated demyelination, and complement inhibitors are under development as new targets in CIDP treatment, with mixed results. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) has also been targeted as a promising treatment avenue due to its role in immunoglobulin G degradation. Efgartigimod is the first FcRn blocker approved for the treatment of CIDP. This review provides an overview of key proposed mechanisms of action in CIDP pathophysiology in the context of both basic scientific findings and treatment targets in recent clinical studies.

Rituximab versus placebo for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a randomized trial

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) often requires prolonged ongoing treatment to prevent worsening. The efficacy of rituximab in preventing worsening after the discontinuation of immunoglobulin therapy in patients with CIDP was assessed. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted at seven Italian hospitals, CIDP patients under immunoglobulin therapy were assigned to receive either rituximab (1 g on Days 1, 15 and 180 ± 7) or placebo. Both groups continued their regular immunoglobulin doses for 6 months post-intervention. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who worsened in any of the following three measures at Month 12, within 6 months after immunoglobulin discontinuation: a decrease of at least one point on the adjusted INCAT score, two points on the MRC sum score, or four points on the RODS centile score. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients deteriorating at Month 18 (within 12 months after immunoglobulin discontinuation), treatment cessation due to adverse events or voluntary reasons, and the time until deterioration after immunoglobulin discontinuation. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06325943) and EUDRACT (number 2017-005034-36), and is now complete. From April 2019 to March 2022, 39 patients were recruited; two withdrew consent. The remaining 37 patients were assigned to rituximab (n = 19) or placebo (n = 18). Median age was 53 (interquartile range 45-64), with 11 (30%) females. A similar proportion of patients in both the rituximab (12/19, 63.2%) and placebo (12/18, 66.6%) groups worsened at Month 12 [odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-3.32]. No significant differences were noted at Month 18 (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.14-2.70), or in the mean scores of each scale at Months 6, 12 and 18. The median time to worsening was 5 months for rituximab and 2 months for placebo (Log-rank P = 0.4372). Treatment was suspended due to adverse events in one rituximab patient. In this study, rituximab was not more effective than placebo in preventing clinical deterioration following the discontinuation of immunoglobulin therapy in CIDP. Further studies might evaluate the efficacy of more frequent or earlier administration of rituximab.

Safety and Cost Analysis of Immunoglobulin Cessation Trials in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic autoimmune neuropathy worldwide. A significant proportion of CIDP patients enter spontaneous or medication-related remission, remaining stable without immunotherapy. Overtreatment of CIDP has clinical and financial implications. We examined performance of IVIg cessation trials in our CIDP cohort and report safety and cost analysis outcomes.

METHODS

In individuals with CIDP on maintenance IVIg treatment, a cessation trial was proposed in clinically stable patients with a static IVIg regimen over a 12-month period. We explored the proportion who were stable off treatment for 12 or more months and the time to recovery in those who declined and were re-treated. We examined cost implications of this approach.

RESULTS

45/125 individuals met criteria for clinical stability, with median age 58 years, I-RODS 37/48, MRC-SS 69/70 and annual treatment costs £107 000/person. Nine individuals had cessation trials resulting in decline within 2 years prior and were not re-challenged, leaving 36 eligible individuals. 12 of 36 (33.3%) consented to cessation trial and eight of those (66.7%) remained stable off treatment for ≥ 12 months. The successful cessation trials resulted in a cost saving of £855 000/year, with a potential further saving of £1.7 million/year if all the eligible individuals had consented. All patients who deteriorated were rescued to previous baseline on retreatment.

INTERPRETATION

Individuals with CIDP should be counselled about the natural history of the disease and future scheduled, targeted cessation trials. A dedicated clinical infrastructure is vital to safely perform cessation trials.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies: Top 10 Clinical Pearls

Immune-mediated neuropathies encompass a range of neurological disorders, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, multifocal motor neuropathy, autoimmune autonomic neuropathies, and paranodal nodopathies. Recognizing clinical patterns is key to narrowing the broad range of differential diagnoses in immune-mediated neuropathies. Electrodiagnostic testing is a useful tool to support the diagnosis of immune-mediated neuropathies. Our understanding of autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies is rapidly advancing, particularly with the discovery of nodal and paranodal antibodies. Recent advances in neuropathy treatment include the utilization of neonatal Fc receptors to reduce antibody recycling, and the development of complement inhibitors to reduce inflammatory damage, offering promising new therapeutic avenues. Timely identification of immune-mediated neuropathies is imperative as delay in diagnosis and treatment may lead to irreversible disability.

Efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab regimen for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab with conventional therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) treatment.

METHODS

Total 73 patients with CIDP were enrolled for the retrospective cohort study, and divided into conventional first-line therapy cohort (n = 40) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg per infusion) cohort (n = 33). The outcome measures include scores of I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS, and COMPASS 31 scale at baseline and regular four visits (4, 16, 28, and 52 weeks), as well as proportion of favorable response and outcome, corticosteroids dosage, and deterioration occurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional therapy cohort, combined rituximab cohort presented better improvements and higher proportion of favorable response in scales assessments at each visit, as well as significantly reduced corticosteroids dosage and deterioration occurrence during the follow-up. Analyses of subgroups showed better improvements in both typical CIDP and CIDP variants in combined rituximab cohort than those in conventional therapy cohort, but had no differences between each other. Early initiating combined rituximab regimen (<10 weeks) showed better improvements than delayed initiation (≥10 weeks) at the first three visits within 28 weeks, while had no difference in favorable prognoses at the last visit of 52 weeks after once reinfusion. No rituximab correlated serious adverse events were reported in our patients.

INTERPRETATION

Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab has been firstly demonstrated for the better efficacy and safety than conventional therapy in CIDP treatment.

Novel therapies in CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous but clinically well-described disease within circumscribed parameters. It is immunologically mediated through several poorly understood mechanisms. First-line therapies with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasma exchange are each effective in about two-thirds of patients. These treatments are seldom associated with complete resolution or cure, and often pose considerable practical, financial and medical implications.Our understanding of many of the key pathological processes in autoimmune diseases is expanding, and novel targeted therapeutics are being developed with promise in several autoimmune neurological disorders.This narrative review looks first at detailing key pathogenic mechanisms of disease in CIDP, followed by an in-depth description of potential novel therapies and the current evidence of their application in clinical practice.

Peripheral neuropathy, an independent risk factor for falls in the elderly, impairs stepping as a postural control mechanism: A case-cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Peripheral neuropathies perturbate the sensorimotor system, causing difficulties in walking-related motor tasks and, eventually, falls. Falls result in functional dependency and reliance on healthcare, especially in older persons. We investigated if peripheral neuropathy is a genuine risk factor for falls in the elderly and if quantification of postural control via posturography is helpful in identifying subjects at risk of falls.

METHODS

Seventeen older persons with a clinical polyneuropathic syndrome of the lower limbs and converging electrophysiology were compared with 14 older persons without polyneuropathy. All participants were characterized via quantitative motor and sensory testing, neuropsychological assessment, and self-questionnaires. Video-nystagmography and caloric test excluded vestibulocochlear dysfunction. For further analysis, all subjects were stratified into fallers and non-fallers. Overall, 28 patients underwent computerized dynamic posturography for individual fall risk assessment. Regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors and predictive posturography parameters.

RESULTS

Neuropathy is an independent risk factor for falls in the elderly, while no differences were observed for age, gender, weight, frailty, DemTect test, timed "Up & Go" test, and dizziness-related handicap score. In computerized dynamic posturography, fallers stepped more often to regain postural control in challenging conditions, while the Rhythmic Weight Shift test showed a lack of anterior-posterior bidirectional voluntary control.

INTERPRETATION

Our study confirms peripheral neuropathy as a risk factor for older persons' falls. Fallers frequently used stepping to regain postural control. The voluntary control of this coping movement was impaired. Further investigations into these parameters' value in predicting the risk of falls in the elderly are warranted.

Long-term safety and tolerability of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% as maintenance therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Results from the ADVANCE-CIDP 3 trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) consists of subcutaneous human immunoglobulin G (IgG) 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) and can be administered at the same dose and interval as intravenous IgG (IVIG). fSCIG recently received US approval as maintenance therapy for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and European approval for adults and children with CIDP after stabilization with IVIG.

METHODS

ADVANCE-CIDP 3 (NCT02955355) was an open-label long-term extension of the Phase 3 double-blind randomized placebo-controlled ADVANCE-CIDP 1 study (NCT02549170) that examined fSCIG safety and efficacy as maintenance CIDP therapy. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Efficacy was an exploratory outcome.

RESULTS

The study provided 220 patient-years of follow-up data from 85 patients. Median (range) exposure was 33 (0-77) months. Patients received fSCIG every 4 weeks (88.2%) or every 3 weeks (11.8%). Median (range) 4-weekly IgG dose equivalent was 64.0 (28.0-200.0) g. Mean (standard deviation) infusion duration was 135.5 (62.8) minutes. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate and self-limiting. Of the 1406 AEs, only 48 were severe and 30 were serious. fSCIG-related AEs (n = 798) included infusion site reactions such as pain, redness, and pruritus. Three infusions (0.1%) were reduced in rate, interrupted, or stopped due to intolerability. Relapse occurred in 10 of 77 patients (13.0%); annual relapse rate was 4.5%. An anti-rHuPH20 antibody titer ≥1:160 was detected in 14 of 84 patients (16.7%); patients who tested positive (≥1:160) had similar relapse rates versus those who tested negative (16.7% vs. 12.3%, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

ADVANCE-CIDP 3 demonstrated favorable fSCIG long-term safety and tolerability consistent with its established safety profile, and a low relapse rate, supporting use as maintenance CIDP treatment.

Pediatric Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune neurological disorder seen in both pediatric and adult populations. CIDP typically presents with progressive and persistent weakness over at least 4 weeks in addition to sensory symptoms in the extremities. Although CIDP shares common clinical features between children and adults, it sometimes presents as a distinct clinical entity in children that requires close attention and recognition. A major caveat when diagnosing a child with CIDP is the clinical and diagnostic overlap with inherited neuropathies, most commonly Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT). Demyelinating CMT (dCMT) and CIDP might share similar clinical presentations, and sometimes it might be difficult to differentiate them on the basis of the electrodiagnostic findings or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumino-cytological dissociation. This indeed merits early consideration for genetic testing in patients who do not respond to conventional CIDP therapies. Current treatment options for CIDP include intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), corticosteroids (CS), and plasmapheresis (PLEX). The need for novel therapies is essential in instances where patients continue to have symptoms despite the standard therapies or due to adverse effects of long-term use of standard therapies such as CS. This paper reviews the challenges in the diagnosis of CIDP in children and the current as well as novel therapies for CIDP.

Outcomes of a patient support programme for subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiencies or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) therapy is important in the treatment of primary (PID) and secondary immunodeficiencies (SID) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Patient support programmes (PSPs) help patients self-administer medication regimens and play a more active role in the self-management of their medical conditions.

AIM

To describe the effectiveness of the CSL Behring CARES PSP in optimising the quality use of SCIg in a hospital-free environment.

DESIGN

This retrospective, observational study analysed records of patients enroled in the CSL Behring CARES PSP. Key outcomes were accessibility and effectiveness. Data were extracted from the patient database and analysed using descriptive methods.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-nine patients with PID (30.8%), SID (53.4%) and CIDP (15.8%) were enroled in the CARES PSP, 92.8% of whom were referred from public hospitals and the remaining from private hospitals. Of the total patient population, 697 (88.3%) received the nurse-led SCIg self-administration training and education (COACH), out of which 656 (94.1%) completed training and achieved competency after an average of 2.3 training sessions. The proportions of patients who achieved competency were similar across age groups and prior SCIg hospital education status.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest real-world evidence study that describes the effectiveness of SCIg PSPs across three therapeutic disease states. These PSPs can optimise hospital resources such as infusion nurse time and allocation of infusion chairs that were once used for intravenous immunoglobulin infusions, improve patient access to SCIg therapy and enable patients self-administer SCIg outside a hospital environment.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP): A comprehensive systematic review of clinical studies and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) presents significant treatment challenges due to its chronic nature, varied clinical presentations, and rarity. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) has emerged as a maintenance therapy, offering potential advantages in administration and patient experience over the previously recognized intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

We included all clinical studies involving CIDP patients treated with SCIG from eleven databases up to March 2024.

RESULTS

50 clinical studies were included in the systematic review, with 22 involved in the meta-analysis. These studies offer clinical data on around 1400 CIDP patients. Almost all studies considered SCIG a maintenance therapy, with the majority of results suggesting it as a viable substitute that may offer comparable or enhanced advantages. Studies covered aspects such as efficacy, safety, quality of life, practicality, economic evaluation, and patient preference. Meta-analysis showed SCIG significantly improved muscle strength and sensory function, had fewer and milder side effects, reduced relapse rates, and received a strong preference.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that SCIG for CIDP maintenance not only provides a more feasible alternative, with economic evaluations showing considerable cost reductions over time, and patient preference for SCIG being pronounced, but may also deliver comparable or superior health outcomes. Ongoing research lines on formulations, techniques, and direct comparative studies are critical to further illuminate, enhance, and expand SCIG's role in treatment.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ADHERE): a multicentre, randomised-withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system that can lead to severe disability from muscle weakness and sensory disturbances. Around a third of patients do not respond to currently available treatments, and many patients with a partial response have residual neurological impairment, highlighting the need for effective alternatives. Efgartigimod alfa, a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in adults with CIDP.

METHODS

ADHERE, a multistage, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolled participants with CIDP from 146 clinical sites from Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America. Participants with evidence of clinically meaningful deterioration entered an open-label phase of weekly 1000 mg subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 for no longer than 12 weeks (stage A). Those with confirmed evidence of clinical improvement (ECI; treatment responders) entered a randomised-withdrawal phase of 1000 mg subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 weekly treatment versus placebo for a maximum of 48 weeks (stage B). Participants were randomised (1:1) through interactive response technology and stratified by their adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (aINCAT) score change during stage A and their most recent CIDP medication within 6 months before screening. Investigators, the clinical research organisation, and participants were masked to the treatment. The primary endpoint in stage A, evaluated in the stage A safety population, was confirmed ECI (≥1 points aINCAT decrease, ≥4 points [centile metric] Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale increase, or ≥8 kPa grip strength increase after four injections and two consecutive visits). The primary endpoint in stage B, evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat population, was the risk of relapse (time to first aINCAT increase of ≥1 points). ADHERE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04281472) and EudraCT (2019-003076-39) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between April 15, 2020, and May 11, 2023, 629 participants were screened; 322 (114 female, 208 male) entered stage A, of whom 214 (66%, 95% CI 61·0-71·6) had confirmed ECI. In stage B, 221 participants were randomised (79 female, 142 male; 111 to subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20, 110 to placebo). Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 significantly reduced the risk of relapse versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·25-0·61]; p<0·0001). 31 (27·9% [19·6-36·3]) participants given subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 had a relapse versus 59 (53·6% [44·3-63·0]) given placebo. In stage A, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 204 (63%) participants and serious TEAEs in 21 (7%). In stage B, TEAEs occurred in 71 (64%) participants on subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and 62 (56%) participants on placebo, and serious TEAEs in six (5%) on subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 and six (5%) on placebo. Three deaths occurred: two in stage A (one non-related and one unlikely related to treatment) and one in stage B (placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

ADHERE showed the efficacy of subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in reducing the risk of relapse versus placebo in people with CIDP who responded to treatment. Further studies are needed to provide data on the longer-term effects of efgartigimod alfa and how it compares with currently available treatment options.

FUNDING

argenx.

Treatment response amplitude and timing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with routine care: Study of a UK cohort

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The amplitude, timing, and determinants of improvement with available treatments are uncertain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Our primary objective was to quantify categorized outcomes with routine care.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied treatment response within 36 months from initiation in 112 consecutive subjects with CIDP. Response was classified into a proposed new "CIDP treatment-response category" (CT-RC), based on achieved endpoints. Determinants of the CT-RC, of timing of maximum improvement, and of treatment discontinuation were ascertained.

RESULTS

The CT-RC demonstrated high concurrent validity with current outcome measures. Thirty-six subjects (32.1%) achieved a "complete response," 37 (33%) a "good partial response," 10 (8.9%) a "moderate partial response," and 15 (13.4%) a "poor partial response." Fourteen subjects (12.5%) were "nonresponsive." The CT-RC was independently predicted only by age. Mean time to maximum improvement was 12.1 months (range = 1-36) and was not associated with any pretreatment covariate. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 24 of 62 (38.2%) partial responders and was only associated with shorter pretreatment disease duration. Nonresponders were older and received a similar number of treatments compared to responders.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-RC classification indicates persistent disability in >60% of treatment responders in CIDP. Timing of maximum improvement is variable, frequently delayed, and unpredictable. Treatment withdrawal without deterioration is achievable in approximately 40% of subjects and may be more likely with prompt treatment. Treatment withdrawal in partial responders and limited escalation in nonresponders suggest implication of physician- and patient-related factors in suboptimal response. More effective treatments/treatment methods and better understanding of other factors influencing response are needed in CIDP.

Patient-reported preferences for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of parenteral drug treatments in adults with immune disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: Several studies have found subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of similar drugs for long-lasting immunological and autoimmune diseases to have similar clinical effectiveness, meaning that what patients report they prefer is, or should be, a major factor in treatment choices. Therefore, it is important to systematically compile evidence regarding patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using SC or IV administration of the same drug. Materials & methods: PubMed database searches were run on 15 October 2021. Studies involving patients with experience of both home-based SC and hospital-based IV administration of immunoglobulins or biological therapies for the treatment of any autoimmune disease or primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) were included. The outcomes assessed were patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and HRQL. Preference data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 3504 citations were screened, and 46 publications describing 37 studies were included in the review. There was a strong overall preference for SC over IV administration, with similar results seen for PIDs and autoimmune diseases: PID, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-94%) preferred SC; autoimmune diseases, 83% (95% CI: 73-92%); overall, 82% (95% CI: 75-89%). The meta-analysis also found that 84% (95% CI: 75-92%) of patients preferred administration at home to treatment in hospital. Analysis of treatment satisfaction using the life quality index found consistently better treatment interference and treatment setting scores with SC administration than with IV administration. Conclusion: Compared with IV infusions in hospital, patients tend to prefer, to be more satisfied with and to report better HRQL with SC administration of the same drug at home, primarily due to the greater convenience. This study contributes to evidence-based care of patients with autoimmune diseases or PIDs.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rozanolixizumab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a randomised, subject-blind, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial and open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a peripheral nerve disorder characterised by weakness and sensory loss. We assessed the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor rozanolixizumab for CIDP management.

METHODS

CIDP01 (NCT03861481) was a randomised, subject-blind, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study. Adults with definite or probable CIDP receiving subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance therapy were randomised 1:1 to 12 once-weekly subcutaneous infusions of rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, stratified according to previous immunoglobulin administration route. Investigators administering treatment and assessing efficacy, and patients, were blinded. The primary outcome was a change from baseline (CFB) to day 85 in inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (iRODS) score. Eligible patients who completed CIDP01 entered the open-label extension CIDP04 (NCT04051944).

RESULTS

In CIDP01, between 26 March 2019 and 31 March 2021, 34 patients were randomised to rozanolixizumab or placebo (17 (50%) each). No significant difference in CFB to day 85 in iRODS centile score was observed between rozanolixizumab (least squares mean 2.0 (SE 3.2)) and placebo (3.4 (2.6); difference -1.5 (90% CI -7.5 to 4.5)). Overall, 14 (82%) patients receiving rozanolixizumab and 13 (76%) receiving placebo experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event during the treatment period. Across CIDP01 and CIDP04, rozanolixizumab was well tolerated over up to 614 days; no clinically meaningful efficacy results were seen. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Rozanolixizumab did not show efficacy in patients with CIDP in this study, although this could be due to a relatively high placebo stability rate. Rozanolixizumab was well tolerated over medium-to-long-term weekly use, with an acceptable safety profile.

Prospective open-label trial with rituximab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy not responding to conventional immune therapies

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients not responding to conventional immune therapies.

METHODS

An open-label, prospective exploratory study was conducted with intravenous rituximab on 17 CIDP patients who had not responded to at least two first-line therapies. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients who showed improvement 6 months after rituximab therapy. The percentage of responders to rituximab, along with a 95% CI, was reported and compared with the 30% response rate after other immunosuppressive drugs previously documented in the literature.

RESULTS

13 of the 17 treated patients (76.5%) showed improvement at 6 months (95% CI 50.1 to 93.2). Among the 14 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up (2 were lost to follow-up after showing improvement at months 8 and 10, and 1 deteriorated at 6 months), 13 (92.9%) demonstrated improvement at 12 months (95% CI 66.1 to 99.8). Nerve conduction parameters improved by at least 20% in two nerves in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients at 6 months and in 7 out of 13 (53.9%) at 12 months. None of the treated patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. There was a significant reduction of circulating CD19+ cells 15 days, 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab seems to be a safe therapy in most patients with CIDP not responding to conventional immune therapies. The high percentage of patients who improved in this study suggests a possible positive effect of rituximab which is worth investigating in future randomised controlled clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05877040.

Targeting Liver Xor by GalNAc-siRNA Is an Effective Strategy for Hyperuricemia Therapy

Hyperuricemia, i.e., increased plasma uric acid concentration, is a common problem in clinical practice, leading to gout or nephrolithiasis, and is associated with other disorders, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and chronic renal disease. Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is a critical rate-limiting enzyme involved in uric acid synthesis and a promising target for hyperuricemia therapy. However, XOR inhibitors currently face clinical problems such as a short half-life and side effects. Here, we found that specifically targeting liver Xor with GalNAc-siRNAs had a good therapeutic effect on hyperuricemia. First, siRNAs were designed to target various sites in the homologous region between Homo sapiens and Mus musculus Xor mRNA and were screened in primary mouse hepatocytes. Then, the siRNAs were modified to increase their stability in vivo and conjugated with GalNAc for liver-specific delivery. The effects of GalNAc-siRNAs were evaluated in three hyperuricemia mouse models, including potassium oxonate and hypoxanthine administration in WT and humanized XDH mice and Uox knockout mice. Febuxostat, a specific XOR inhibitor used for hyperuricemia treatment, was used as a positive control. Targeting liver Xor with GalNAc-siRNAs by subcutaneous administration reduced plasma uric acid levels, uric acid accumulation in the kidney, renal inflammation, and fibrosis, thereby alleviating kidney damage in hyperuricemia mouse models without hepatoxicity. The results demonstrated that targeting liver Xor with GalNAc-siRNAs was a promising strategy for hyperuricemia therapy.

[Cutting edge of diagnosis and treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) based on the EAN/PNS guideline 2021]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a most common chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy, and includes a number of clinical subtypes. The major phenotype is "typical CIDP", which is characterized by symmetric polyneuropathy and "proximal and distal" muscle weakness. During the historical changes in the concept of CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy, anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy, and autoimmune nodopathy have been excluded. Currently CIDP is considered as a syndrome including typical CIDP and CIDP variant such as distal CIDP and multifocal CIDP. In 2021, the international guideline of diagnosis and treatment for CIDP, European Academy of Neurology (EAN)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) Guideline, was published. This review article introduces the putline of the guideline with medical-social situation in Japan. The diagnosis of CIDP is based on (1) phenotype of typical CIDP or variant, (2) electrophysiologic evidence of peripheral nerve demyelination, and (3) exclusion criteria. The first-line treatments are corticosteroids or immunoglobulin therapy, and plasma exchange should be considered if the 2 treatments were not effective sufficiently. This guideline recommends intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin as a maintenance therapy, and suggests other immune-suppressive agents. In the near future, new treatment with biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies against neonatal Fc receptors, complements, and CD19/20 will be approved.

Long-term follow-up of relapse and remission of CIDP in a Chinese cohort

Objective

We aim to describe the long-term outcome of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) after immune treatment in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

Between March 2015 and March 2023, 89 patients fulfilling the criteria for CIDP were followed up for a median of 22 months after treatment. Nine had positive antibodies against nodal-paranodal cell-adhesion molecules. Patients were treated according to clinical requirements with prednisone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and/or immunosuppressant.

Results

A total of 78/89 patients had decreased inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) scores at the last follow-up. For CIDP patients treated with steroids, 35 were stable without relapse after cessation or with a small maintenance dose; 2 relapsed at a high dose (20 mg/day); 15 relapsed at a low dosage (<20 mg/day) and 11 did not respond. The INCAT before treatment was significantly lower in those without relapse (median INCAT 2 vs 3, p=0.030). IVIg was effective in 37/52 CIDP patients. 28 CIDP patients and 4 autoimmune nodopathy patients were treated with immunosuppressants. The average INCAT was 3.3±1.9 before and 1.9±1.3 after immunosuppressant treatment (p=0.001) in CIDP.

Conclusion

The long-term prognosis of CIDP patients was generally favourable. Nearly half of our patients treated with steroid were stable without relapse after cessation or with a small maintenance dose. The risk of relapse was higher in those with high INCAT. We recommend slowly tapering prednisone based on clinical judgement.

Clinical, biological, electrophysiological and therapeutic profile of patients with anti-MAG neuropathy according to MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutations and underlying haemopathy

INTRODUCTION

Anti-MAG neuropathies are associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or with a malignant haemopathy. Our objective was to determine whether the presence of a haemopathy or somatic mutations of MYD88 and CXCR4 genes influences disease presentation and response to rituximab (RTX).

METHODS

We included 79 patients (mean age 74 years, disease duration 9.68 years) who had a bone marrow aspiration with morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis. MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutations were analysed in peripheral B cells. Information collected included: inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment sensory sum score (ISS), MRC testing, overall neuropathy limitation scale (ONLS), Rash-built Overall Disability Score (RODS), ataxia score, anti-MAG titres, peak IgM dosage, neurofilament light chain levels, motor and sensory amplitudes, motor unit index (MUNIX) and motor unit size index (MUSIX) sum scores. Efficacy of RTX was evaluated at 12 months in 26 patients.

RESULTS

Malignant haematological disorders were discovered in 17 patients (22%): 13 Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, 3 marginal zone lymphoma and one mantle cell lymphoma. MYD88L265P mutation was detected in 29/60 (48%) patients and CXCR4 in 1 single patient. Disease severity, biological and electrophysiological data and response to RTX were comparable in patients with MGUS/lymphoma and patients with/without MYD88L265P mutation. ISS was lower and MUSIX higher in patients improved by RTX.

CONCLUSIONS

MYD88L265P mutation and underlying haemopathies are not predictive of a more severe disease. However, in cases of resistant and progressive neuropathy, they provide an opportunity to prescribe newly available drugs such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: Current Therapeutic Approaches and Future Outlooks

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a treatable autoimmune disorder, for which different treatment options are available. Current first-line evidence-based therapies for CIDP include intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids and plasma exchanges. Despite lack of evidence, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used in circumstances of refractoriness and, more debatably, of perceived overdependence on first-line therapies. Rituximab is currently the object of a randomized controlled trial for CIDP. Based on case series, and although rarely considered, haematopoietic autologous stem cell transplants may be effective in refractory disease, with low mortality and high remission rates. A new therapeutic option has appeared with efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, recently shown to significantly lower relapse rate versus placebo, after withdrawal from previous immunotherapy. Other neonatal Fc receptor blockers, nipocalimab and batoclimab, are under study. The C1 complement-inhibitor SAR445088, acting in the proximal portion of the classical complement system, is currently the subject of a new study in treatment-responsive, refractory and treatment-naïve subjects. Finally, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, which exert anti-B cell effects, may represent another future research avenue. The widening of the therapeutic armamentarium enhances the need for improved evaluation of treatment effects and reliable biomarkers in CIDP.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.

Challenges in the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy in Adults: Current Perspectives

Diagnosing Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) poses numerous challenges. The heterogeneous presentations of CIDP variants, its mimics, and the complexity of interpreting electrodiagnostic criteria are just a few of the many reasons for misdiagnoses. Early recognition and treatment are important to reduce the risk of irreversible axonal damage, which may lead to permanent disability. The diagnosis of CIDP is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, nerve conduction study findings that indicate demyelination, and other supportive criteria. In 2021, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) published a revision on the most widely adopted guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP. This updated guideline now includes clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP variants (previously termed atypical CIDP), updated supportive criteria, and sensory criteria as an integral part of the electrodiagnostic criteria. Due to its many rules and exceptions, this guideline is complex and misinterpretation of nerve conduction study findings remain common. CIDP is treatable with intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, and plasma exchange. The choice of therapy should be tailored to the individual patient's situation, taking into account the severity of symptoms, potential side effects, patient autonomy, and past treatments. Treatment responses should be evaluated as objectively as possible using disability and impairment scales. Applying these outcome measures consistently in clinical practice aids in recognizing the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of a treatment and facilitates timely consideration of alternative diagnoses or treatments. This review provides an overview of the current perspectives on the diagnostic process and first-line treatments for managing the disease.

Contribution of Flexig mobile application to assess adherence of patients treated with immunoglobulins in chronic diseases

Background

Long-term therapeutic adherence remains an essential challenge for better management of chronic diseases. It is estimated at 50% in developed countries.

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate, under real conditions, the influence of satisfaction with Flexig use on adherence to subcutaneous immunoglobulin home-treatment therapy in a sample of French patients with chronic dysimmune diseases.

Methods

This is a 2-year prospective cohort involving 241 patients from several hospitals in France whose data were extracted from the Flexig 2.0 mHealth application. Satisfaction was assessed by System Usability Scale (SUS) and user experience by User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Adherence to Ig therapy was assessed by medication possession rate. We analyzed the relationship between Flexig user satisfaction and adherence to treatment, as well as determinants of adherence.

Results

Most patients (82.7%) were being treated for an immunodeficiency, versus 17.3% for a chronic autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Almost all patients (97.9%) received subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy. The patients' ages (means ± SDs) were 36.5 ± 18.3 years, disease duration was about 6 years, and 58.5% were men. Flexig user satisfaction was 76.2 ± 8 (System Usability Scale), associated with good user experience reported on UEQ. Adherence rate was 99.7%. Time on app, disease duration, and Flexig user satisfaction were statistically predictive of adherence to IgG therapy. High adherence to Ig therapy was associated with good satisfaction with using Flexig (P < .0001).

Conclusion

Adherence to Ig therapy in chronic dysimmune disease was strong and was associated with good satisfaction among Flexig users, suggesting that electronic support may be a valuable compliance aid.

[Prospect of novel therapies in immune-mediated neuropathies]

The efficacy of immunotherapies such as steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin have been proven in various immune-mediated neuropathies. However, these treatments sometimes lack the efficacy in a part of patients with the immune-mediated neuropathies. In addition, anti-myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy is usually refractory to the treatments. Recently, novel therapies targeting a molecule which are associated with pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases, have been developed. These molecularly targeted therapies are notable in immune-mediated neuropathies as novel drug candidates. In the present article, current treatments and future prospect of novel therapies in immune-mediated neuropathies will be reviewed.

Comparative analysis of albumin quotient and total CSF protein in immune-mediated neuropathies: a multicenter study on diagnostic implications

Introduction

Blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier dysfunction is pivotal for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, especially in spinal nerve root inflammation. Typically, either total CSF protein or the CSF to serum albumin ratio (QAlb) is measured. Total CSF protein measurements have limitations, notably its fixed reference value regardless of age, in contrast to the age-dependent reference for QAlb. Our goal was to evaluate both markers in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies.

Methods

In our multicenter research, we collected retrospective CSF data from patients suffering from immune-mediated neuropathies across four German research centers. These parameters were analyzed in relation to their clinical characteristics.

Results

Out of 419 samples, 36 (8.6%) displayed a notable variation between total CSF protein and QAlb values. A detailed analysis revealed that patients displaying elevated QAlb but normal total CSF protein levels were significantly younger at disease onset (p = 0.01), at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), and when undergoing lumbar puncture (p = 0.001) compared to patients with elevated CSF protein and normal QAlb levels. These effects were especially evident for the subgroup of samples derived by female patients.

Discussion

Our work confirms the crucial role of QAlb in diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies and particularly its efficacy as a marker for evaluating the blood-CSF barrier in patients with an earlier disease onset. Considering the significance of the albumin quotient, its assessment is especially advisable in younger patients of female sex to avoid missing a potential barrier dysfunction that might be falsely negative when using total protein.

Immunomodulatory effects of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is not known whether the route of administration affects the mechanisms of action of therapeutic immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the immunomodulatory effects of intravenous (IVIg) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with CIDP and in IVIg-treated common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients.

METHODS

Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were obtained from 30 CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 10 CIDP patients receiving SCIg, and 15 patients with CVID receiving IVIg. Samples and clinical data were obtained prior to IVIg/SCIg and at 3 days, 7 days, and, in CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 21 days post-administration. Serum cytokines were assessed by Luminex-based multiplex assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immune cells were characterized by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Immune cell profiles of CIDP and CVID patients differed in frequencies of myeloid dendritic cells and cytotoxic natural killer cells. During treatment with IVIg or SCIg in CIDP patients, cellular immunomarkers were largely similar. CIDP patients receiving IVIg had higher macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (p = 0.01), interleukin (IL)-4 (p = 0.04), and IL-33 (p = 0.04) levels than SCIg recipients. IVIg treatment more broadly modulated cytokines in CIDP than SCIg treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the modulation of cellular immunomarkers in CIDP is independent of the application route of therapeutic immunoglobulin. Minor differences were observed between CIDP and CVID patients. In contrast, cytokines were differentially modulated by IVIg and SCIg in CIDP.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy and Evaluation of the Visual Evoked Potentials: A Review of the Literature

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterised by the progressive demyelination of peripheral nerves, resulting in motor and sensory deficits. While much research has focused on clinical and electrophysiological aspects of CIDP, there is an emerging interest in exploring its impact on the visual system through visual evoked potentials (VEPs). This comprehensive review synthesises existing literature on VEP findings in CIDP patients, shedding light on their potential diagnostic and prognostic value. The review thoroughly examines studies spanning the last two decades, exploring VEP abnormalities in CIDP patients. Notably, VEP studies have consistently revealed prolonged latencies and reduced amplitudes in CIDP patients compared to healthy controls. These alterations in VEP parameters suggest that the demyelinating process extends beyond the peripheral nervous system to affect the central nervous system, particularly the optic nerve and its connections. The correlation between VEP abnormalities and clinical manifestations of CIDP, such as visual impairment and sensory deficits, underscores the clinical relevance of VEP assessment in CIDP management. Furthermore, this review addresses the potential utility of VEPs in aiding CIDP diagnosis and monitoring disease progression. VEP abnormalities may serve as valuable biomarkers for disease activity, helping clinicians make timely therapeutic decisions. Moreover, this review discusses the limitations and challenges associated with VEP assessment in CIDP, including variability in recording techniques and the need for standardised protocols. In conclusion, this review highlights the evolving role of VEPs as a non-invasive tool in CIDP evaluation. The consistent VEP abnormalities observed in CIDP patients suggest the involvement of the central nervous system in this demyelinating disorder. As our understanding of CIDP and its pathophysiology continues to evolve, further research in this area may lead to improved diagnostic accuracy and monitoring strategies, ultimately enhancing the clinical management of CIDP patients.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Historical Perspective

The therapeutic administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers various advantages over intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This narrative review examines and compares SCIg versus IVIg in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). SCIg is as effective as IVIg but is better tolerated and easier to administer, as intravenous access is not required. Furthermore, SCIg administration is more convenient and cost-effective than IVIg, enabling flexible treatment scheduling at home and improving patients' overall quality of life. The availability of highly concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) subcutaneous solutions, such as IgPro20, a 20% IgG solution stabilized with L-proline, allows for the administration of larger volumes in a single session, while the parallel development of new technological devices enables the delivery of higher doses over a shorter time. Based on the results of the PATH study, SCIg has become a well-established therapy in CIDP. In addition to discussing the advantages of SCIg, this review summarizes the evolution of SCIg by discussing all the relevant clinical studies which have considered its use in the treatment of CIDP.

How I Treat Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Podcast

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune-mediated neuropathy that typically presents with progressive or relapsing, symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness of upper and lower limbs, sensory involvement of at least two limbs, and decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes. The symptoms of CIDP can be similar to those of other neuropathies, making diagnosis difficult, which can often lead to delays in correct diagnosis and treatment. The updated European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) 2021 guideline outlines a set of diagnostic criteria that help to identify CIDP with high accuracy and provides recommendations for the treatment of CIDP. The aim of this podcast, featuring Dr. Urvi Desai (Professor of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health Neurosciences Institute Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte), is to discuss how the new guideline impacts diagnosis and treatment decisions in her everyday clinical practice. Using a patient case study example, the updated guideline recommends assessing a patient for clinical, electrophysiological, and supportive criteria for CIDP, enabling a more straightforward diagnosis of either typical CIDP, a CIDP variant, or an autoimmune nodopathy. A second patient case study highlights how the new guideline no longer considers autoimmune nodopathies as CIDP, as patients with these disorders do not meet hallmark CIDP criteria. This leaves an unmet need in terms of guidance on how to treat this subset of patients. Although the new guideline has not necessarily changed treatment preference in clinical practice, the addition of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) into the guideline now better reflects clinical practice. The guideline helps to define and categorize CIDP more simply and consistently, allowing quicker and more accurate diagnosis, leading to a positive impact on treatment response and prognosis. These real-world insights into the diagnosis and management of patients with CIDP could help guide best clinical practice and help facilitate optimization of patient outcomes.

Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% as maintenance therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: The ADVANCE-CIDP 1 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

ADVANCE-CIDP 1 evaluated facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG; human immunoglobulin G 10% with recombinant human hyaluronidase) efficacy and safety in preventing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse.

METHODS

ADVANCE-CIDP 1 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 54 sites in 21 countries. Eligible adults had definite or probable CIDP and adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores of 0-7 (inclusive), and received stable intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for ≥12 weeks before screening. After stopping IVIG, patients were randomized 1:1 to fSCIG 10% or placebo for 6 months or until relapse/discontinuation. fSCIG 10% was administered at the same dose (or matching placebo volume) and interval as pre-randomization IVIG. The primary outcome was patient proportion experiencing CIDP relapse (≥1-point increase in adjusted INCAT score from pre-subcutaneous treatment baseline) in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included time to relapse and safety endpoints.

RESULTS

Overall, 132 patients (mean age 54.4 years, 56.1% male) received fSCIG 10% (n = 62) or placebo (n = 70). CIDP relapse was reduced with fSCIG 10% versus placebo (n = 6 [9.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.5%, 19.6%] vs n = 22 [31.4%; 21.8%, 43.0%], respectively; absolute difference: -21.8% [-34.5%, -7.9%], p = .0045). Relapse probability was higher with placebo versus fSCIG 10% over time (p = .002). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with fSCIG 10% (79.0% of patients) than placebo (57.1%), but severe (1.6% vs 8.6%) and serious AEs (3.2% vs 7.1%) were less common.

INTERPRETATION

fSCIG 10% more effectively prevented CIDP relapse than placebo, supporting its potential use as maintenance CIDP treatment.

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies: Pathophysiology and Management

Dysfunction of the immune system can result in damage of the peripheral nervous system. The immunological mechanisms, which include macrophage infiltration, inflammation and proliferation of Schwann cells, result in variable degrees of demyelination and axonal degeneration. Aetiology is diverse and, in some cases, may be precipitated by infection. Various animal models have contributed and helped to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms in acute and chronic inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies (Guillain-Barre Syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, respectively). The presence of specific anti-glycoconjugate antibodies indicates an underlying process of molecular mimicry and sometimes assists in the classification of these disorders, which often merely supports the clinical diagnosis. Now, the electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor in characterizing another subgroup of treatable motor neuropathies (multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block), which is distinct from Lewis-Sumner syndrome (multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy) in its response to treatment modalities as well as electrophysiological features. Furthermore, paraneoplastic neuropathies are also immune-mediated and are the result of an immune reaction to tumour cells that express onconeural antigens and mimic molecules expressed on the surface of neurons. The detection of specific paraneoplastic antibodies often assists the clinician in the investigation of an underlying, sometimes specific, malignancy. This review aims to discuss the immunological and pathophysiological mechanisms that are thought to be crucial in the aetiology of dysimmune neuropathies as well as their individual electrophysiological characteristics, their laboratory features and existing treatment options. Here, we aim to present a balance of discussion from these diverse angles that may be helpful in categorizing disease and establishing prognosis.

Beneficial effects and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A case report and literature review

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy. First-line treatments for CIDP include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. However, the application is always limited by high costs, effectiveness, and adverse events. This study investigated a new potentially effective and safe therapeutic treatment to alleviate CIDP symptoms and improve the quality of life. In the present case, a 47-year-old rural woman presented with weakness and numbness of progressive extremities. She was diagnosed with CIDP based on abnormal cerebrospinal fluid and electromyography. The patient was treated with intravenous dexamethasone for 1 week and with Huangqi-Guizhi-Wuwu and Bu-Yang-Huan-Wu decoctions for 90 days. Surprisingly, after the treatment, the weakness and numbness were eliminated, and the quality of life improved. The varying INCAT, MRC, and BI scores also reflected the treatment effects. After 8 months of discharge, the symptoms did not relapse during the follow-up. We also searched “traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)” and “CIDP” in PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases, Wanfang Data, and the Chongqing Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database. Finally, only ten studies were included in the literature review. Three studies were randomized controlled trials, and seven were case reports or case series. There were 419 CIDP patients, but all study sites were in China. Nine TCM formulas involving 44 herbs were reported, with Huang Qi (Astragalus membranaceus) being the most important herb. In conclusion, the case and literature demonstrated that TCM treatment might be a more effective, low-cost, and safe option for treating CIDP. Although these preliminary findings are promising, a larger sample size and higher-quality randomized clinical trials are urgently required to confirm our findings.

A Budget Impact Model of Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with IgPro20 (Hizentra) Relative to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the United States

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare, progressive autoimmune disease causing peripheral nervous system dysfunction. Guidelines recommend immunoglobulin (IG) therapy as an immunomodulatory agent in CIDP. Drawbacks and unmet needs with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) include adverse effects and wear-off effects, along with the burden of administration based on site of care. Subcutaneous administration of Hizentra, a subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) reduces patient burden by allowing self-administration outside the hospital setting and has fewer adverse events (AEs).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the expected cost of treatment and the budget impact of Hizentra compared with IVIG for maintenance treatment of CIDP in the United States.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to estimate the expected budget impact of maintenance treatment with Hizentra for US stakeholders. The model adopts primarily a US integrated delivery network perspective and, secondarily, a commercial perspective over a 1-year time horizon. Pharmacy costs were based on a payment mix of average sales price (73%), wholesale acquisition cost (2%), and average wholesale price (25%). Costs in the model reflect 2022 US dollars. In accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines and recommendations for budget impact modeling, no discounting was performed. The PATH clinical study of Hizentra maintenance in CIDP was used to determine clinical inputs for relapse rates at initial assessment (24 weeks) and at 52 weeks for Hizentra. The ICE clinical study of Gamunex maintenance in CIDP was the basis of relapse rates for Gamunex (and other IVIGs). Literature-based estimates were obtained for infusion costs by site of care, costs of IVIG infusion-related complications, and significant IVIG AE rates. Hizentra AE rates from the US Hizentra prescribing information were assessed but were not included in the model as the AEs in CIDP were mild, easily treated, and self-limited. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate variations from the base case.

RESULTS

The model showed that a Hizentra starting dose of 0.2 g/kg is expected to result in annual cost savings of US$32,447 per patient compared with IVIG. For a hypothetical 25-million-member plan, the budget impact of a 10% market share shift from IVIG to Hizentra is expected to result in savings of US$2,296,235.

CONCLUSION

This analysis projects that Hizentra is likely associated with favorable economic benefit compared with IVIG in managing CIDP.

Treatment of CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is a disabling but treatable disorder. However, misdiagnosis is common, and it can be difficult to optimise its treatment. Various agents are used both for first and second line. First-line options are intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids and plasma exchange. Second-line therapies may be introduced as steroid-sparing agents or as more potent escalation therapy. It is also important to consider symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain and non-pharmacological interventions. We discuss the evidence for the various treatments and explain the practicalities of the different approaches. We also outline strategies for monitoring response and assessing the ongoing need for therapy.

On the path to evidence-based therapy in neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of acquired and genetic diseases characterized by loss of motor functionality. Although cure is the goal, many therapeutic strategies have been envisioned and are being studied in randomized clinical trials and entered clinical practice. As in all scientific endeavors, the successful clinical translation depends on the quality and translatability of preclinical findings and on the predictive value and feasibility of the clinical models. This chapter focuses on five exemplary diseases: childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disorders, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to illustrate the progress made on the path to evidenced-based therapy.

Standardized Tapering off Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Attempting discontinuation of treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is recommended. However, there is no evidence based regimen for tapering off subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). This trial investigated stepwise tapering off SCIG to detect remission and the lowest effective dosage. During tapering off, frequent vs less frequent clinical evaluation was compared.

METHODS

Patients with CIDP receiving a stable SCIG dosage followed a standardized tapering off regimen: 90%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% of the initial dose every 12th week, pending no deterioration occurred. In case of relapse during tapering off, the lowest effective dose was identified. Treatment with SCIG was registered for two years after participation. Disability score and grip strength were primary parameters. Participants were randomized to clinical evaluation every 6th week (frequent) or 12th week (less frequent).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included of which thirty-five relapsed. Twenty patients (36%) were able to discontinue treatment without relapse. In relapsing patients, median dosage could be reduced by 10% (range, 0-75). After two years, 18 of 20 patients were still in remission without treatment. Frequent clinical evaluation did not detect deterioration more frequently than less frequent evaluation; RR 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2-1.2) (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

In stable CIDP patients, SCIG could be completely tapered off in 36% of the patients and only in 10% of these patients relapse occurred during the following two years. More frequent evaluation was not superior to detect deterioration.

Acute/chronic inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy

Autoimmune neuropathy may present acutely or with a more progressive and/or relapsing and remitting course. Acute inflammatory neuropathy or Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has variable presentations but by far the most common is acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy which is characterized by rapidly progressive proximal and distal symmetric weakness, sensory loss, and depressed reflexes. The most common chronic autoimmune neuropathy is chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, which in its most typical form is clinically similar to acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (proximal and distal symmetric weakness, sensory loss, and depressed reflexes) but differs in that onset is much more gradual, i.e., over at least 8 weeks. While the majority of GBS cases result from a postinfectious activation of the immune system, presumably in a genetically susceptible host, less is understood regarding the etiopathogenesis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Both acute and chronic forms of these inflammatory neuropathies are driven by some combination of innate and adaptive immune pathways, with differing contributions depending on the neuropathy subtype. Both disorders are largely clinical diagnoses, but diagnostic tools are available to confirm the diagnosis, prognosticate, detect variant forms, and rule out mimics. Given the autoimmune underpinnings of both disorders, immunosuppressive and immunomodulating treatments are typically given in both diseases; however, they differ in their response to treatment.

Tips in navigating the diagnostic complexities of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) includes important revisions to the previous 2010 guideline. This article highlights the new criteria and recommendations for the differential diagnosis of CIDP. In the revised guideline, the CIDP spectrum has been modified to include typical CIDP and four well-characterized CIDP variants, namely distal, multifocal/focal, motor and sensory CIDP, replacing the term 'atypical' CIDP. To improve the diagnosis of CIDP, the revised guideline attempts to improve the specificity of the diagnostic criteria for typical CIDP and the four CIDP variants. Specific clinical and electrodiagnostic (including both motor and sensory conduction) criteria are provided for typical CIDP and each of the CIDP variants. The levels of diagnostic certainty have been changed to CIDP and possible CIDP, with the removal of probable CIDP (due to the lack of difference in the accuracy of the electrodiagnostic criteria for probable CIDP) and definite CIDP (due to the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis). If the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria allow only for a diagnosis of possible CIDP, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound, nerve magnetic resonance imaging, objective treatment response, and nerve biopsy can be used as supportive criteria to upgrade the diagnosis to CIDP. Although the revised guideline needs to be validated and its strengths and weaknesses assessed, using the guideline will likely improve the accuracy of diagnosis of CIDP and variants of CIDP, and aid in distinguishing CIDP from conditions with similar features.

Update on therapy of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

Chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), are a group of disorders deemed to be caused by an immune response against peripheral nerve antigens. Several immune therapies have been reported to be variably effective in these neuropathies including steroids, plasma exchange, and high-dose intravenous (IVIg) or subcutaneous (SCIg) immunoglobulins. These therapies are however far from being invariably effective and may be associated with a number of side effects leading to the use of immunosuppressive agents whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in randomized trials. More recently, new biological agents, such as rituximab, have proved to be effective in patients with neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and are currently tested in CIDP.

French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system, primarily affecting the myelin sheath. The pathophysiology of CIDP is complex, involving both humoral and cellular immunity. The diagnosis of CIDP should be suspected in patients with symmetrical proximal and distal motor weakness and distal sensory symptoms of progressive onset, associated with decreased/abolished tendon reflexes. Treatments include intraveinous immunoglobulins, steroids and plasma exchange, with usually an induction phase followed by a maintenance therapy with progressive weaning. Treatment should be rapidly initiated to prevent axonal degeneration, which may compromise recovery. CIDP outcome is variable, ranging from mild distal paresthesiae to complete loss of ambulation. There have been several breakthroughs in the diagnosis and management of CIDP the past ten years, e.g. discovery of antibodies against the node of Ranvier, contribution of nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnosis, and demonstration of subcutaneous immunoglobulins efficiency. This led us to elaborate French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric CIDP patients. These recommendations include diagnosis assessment, treatment, and follow-up.

Using a scenario approach to assess for the current and future demand of immunoglobulins: An interview and literature study from The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

To explore the current and future demand of immunoglobulins globally and specifically for the Netherlands by assessing: (I) which specialties contribute to current demand, (II) new areas of medical need, (III) which transformational factors may impact demand and to what effect, by using a scenario approach.

BACKGROUND

As immunoglobulin demand continues to increase globally, there is concern of increasing shortages and questions of whether and how future demand will continue based on medical need.

METHODS/MATERIALS

In line with scenario principles, a scoping review of Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane and grey literature was conducted. Semi-structured interviews with subject matter experts were held. The results of the review and interviews were analysed for major themes.

RESULTS

The scoping review resulted in 97 articles, 74 regarding clinical uses, and 23 regarding organisational and other themes. Fifteen clinical and non-clinical experts were interviewed. I) Neurology, immunology, and haematology were specialties that contribute most to current demand. II) Regarding potential new areas of medical need, the literature review resulted in more indications than the interviews, for example, post-renal transplants. III) Four groups of key transformational factors were found: factors that could increase immunoglobulin demand (e.g., EMA revisions), decrease demand (e.g., replacement products, Dutch Transfer Act 2021), factors that remain to be seen how it impacts demand (e.g., further evidence), and miscellaneous factors (e.g., supply-related).

CONCLUSION

Having identified the specialties and relevant transformational factors that affect immunoglobulin demand, more research is needed on what clinical or organisational strategies would be effective in controlling demand in general for the Netherlands and abroad. Other blood establishments may also use a scenario approach to increase preparedness for future (un)expected developments.

Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic peripheral polyneuropathy that results in disability through immune mediated nerve injury, but which not uncommonly has residual and irreversible neurologic deficits after the active inflammatory component of the disorder has been treated. Management of the condition entails addressing both the abnormal immune activity that drives ongoing or active deficits while also managing residual symptoms through supportive interventions. Immune based treatments are grounded in several important principles. First, early treatment is guided by evidence-based proven effective therapies that sequentially escalate depending on the response. Second, optimization or personalization of first line treatments is needed in order to understand the ideal dose for any given patient, and whether long term treatment is needed at all. Third, although many immunosuppressive agents may be utilized in non-responding patients or when intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)/corticosteroid sparing intervention is desired, all are unproven and require a delicate balance between risk, cost, and unknown likelihood of benefit that is tailored to each individual patient's unique circumstances. There is no reliable disease activity biomarker that can be used to guide treatment - a reality that makes it very challenging to optimize treatment to individual patient needs. Serial clinical assessments are key to understanding the value of continued immunotherapy or if long-term therapy is needed at all. Regardless of the immunotherapy status of a patient, equally important is addressing residual deficits through supportive interventions including physical therapy, adaptive equipment, pain management, and emotional support. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Evaluating the impact of calibration of patient-reported outcomes measures on results from randomized clinical trials: a simulation study based on Rasch measurement theory

Background

Meaningfully interpreting patient-reported outcomes (PRO) results from randomized clinical trials requires that the PRO scores obtained in the trial have the same meaning across patients and previous applications of the PRO instrument. Calibration of PRO instruments warrants this property. In the Rasch measurement theory (RMT) framework, calibration is performed by fixing the item parameter estimates when measuring the targeted concept for each individual of the trial. The item parameter estimates used for this purpose are typically obtained from a previous “calibration” study. But imposing this constraint on item parameters, instead of freely estimating them directly in the specific sample of the trial, may hamper the ability to detect a treatment effect. The objective of this simulation study was to explore the potential negative impact of calibration of PRO instruments that were developed using RMT on the comparison of results between treatment groups, using different analysis methods.

Methods

PRO results were simulated following a polytomous Rasch model, for a calibration and a trial sample. Scenarios included varying sample sizes, with instrument of varying number of items and modalities, and varying item parameters distributions. Different treatment effect sizes and distributions of the two patient samples were also explored. Cross-sectional comparison of treatment groups was performed using different methods based on a random effect Rasch model. Calibrated and non-calibrated approaches were compared based on type-I error, power, bias, and variance of the estimates for the difference between groups.

Results

There was no impact of the calibration approach on type-I error, power, bias, and dispersion of the estimates. Among other findings, mistargeting between the PRO instrument and patients from the trial sample (regarding the level of measured concept) resulted in a lower power and higher position bias than appropriate targeting.

Conclusions

Calibration does not compromise the ability to accurately assess a treatment effect using a PRO instrument developed within the RMT paradigm in randomized clinical trials. Thus, given its essential role in producing interpretable results, calibration should always be performed when using a PRO instrument developed using RMT as an endpoint in a randomized clinical trial.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01680-z.

Incidence and risk factors for intravenous immunoglobulin-related hemolysis: A systematic review of clinical trial and real-world populations

Background

Severe hemolysis rarely occurs in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. A systematic review was performed to assess the incidence of IVIG‐related hemolysis and the impact of patient and product risk factors.

Study Design and Methods

A systematic literature search for terms related to “IVIG products”, “hemolysis,” and “adverse events” was conducted in Embase for articles published between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021. Studies with no clinical datasets, no IVIG treatment, or where IVIG was used to treat hemolytic conditions were excluded. Of the 430 articles retrieved, 383 were excluded based on titles/abstracts and 14 were excluded after in‐depth review.

Results

In total, 33 articles were analyzed and separated into observational studies (n = 16), clinical trials (n = 8), and case reports (n = 9). The incidence proportion for IVIG‐related hemolysis ranged from 0% to 19% in observational studies and 0%–21% in clinical trials. A higher incidence of IVIG‐related hemolysis was consistently reported in patients with blood groups A and AB. Hemolysis occurred more frequently in patients treated with IVIG for some conditions such as Kawasaki disease; however, this may be confounded by the high dose of IVIG therapy. IVIG‐related hemolysis incidence was lower in studies using IVIG products citing manufacturing processes to reduce isoagglutinin levels than products that did not.

Conclusion

This analysis identified patient and product risk factors including blood group, IVIG dose, and IVIG manufacturing processes associated with elevated IVIG‐related hemolysis incidence.