Beta-arrestin acts as a clathrin adaptor in endocytosis of the beta2-adrenergic receptor

Genetically encoded sensors illuminate in vivo detection for neurotransmission: Development, application, and optimization strategies

Limitations in existing tools have hindered neuroscientists from achieving a deeper understanding of complex behaviors and diseases. The recent development and optimization of genetically encoded sensors offer a powerful solution for investigating intricate dynamics such as calcium influx, membrane potential, and the release of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. In contrast, traditional methods are constrained by insufficient spatial and/or temporal resolution, low sensitivity, and stringent application conditions. Genetically encoded sensors have gained widespread popularity due to their advantageous features, which stem from their genetic encoding and optical imaging capabilities. These include broad applicability, tissue specificity, and non-invasive operation. When combined with advanced microscopic techniques, optogenetics, and machine learning approaches, these sensors have become versatile tools for studying neuronal circuits in intact living systems, providing millisecond-scale temporal resolution and spatial resolution ranging from nanometers to micrometers. In this review, we highlight the advantages of genetically encoded sensors over traditional methods in the study of neurotransmission. We also discuss their recent advancements, diverse applications, and optimization strategies.

β-Arrestin Condensates Regulate G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of receptors in the genome and control many signaling cascades essential for survival. GPCR signaling is regulated by β-arrestins, multifunctional adapter proteins that direct receptor desensitization, internalization, and signaling. While at many GPCRs, β-arrestins interact with a wide array of signaling effectors, it is unclear how β-arrestins promote such varied functions. Here we show that β-arrestins undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) to form condensates that regulate GPCR function. We demonstrate that β-arrestin oligomerization occurs in proximity to the GPCR and regulates GPCR functions such as internalization and signaling. This model is supported by a cryoEM structure of the adhesion receptor ADGRE1 in a 2:2 complex with β-arrestin 1, with a β-arrestin orientation that can promote oligomerization. Our work provides a paradigm for β-arrestin condensates as regulators of GPCR function, with LLPS serving as an important promoter of signaling compartmentalization at GPCRs.

Arrestin-independent internalization of the GLP-1 receptor is facilitated by a GRK, clathrin, and caveolae-dependent mechanism

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) plays an important role in regulating insulin secretion and reducing body weight, making it a prominent target in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Extensive research on GLP-1R signaling has provided insights into the connection between receptor function and physiological outcomes, such as the correlation between Gs signaling and insulin secretion, yet the exact mechanisms regulating signaling remain unclear. Here, we explore the internalization pathway of GLP-1R, which is crucial for controlling insulin release and maintaining pancreatic beta-cell function. Utilizing a reliable and sensitive time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) internalization assay, combined with HEK293-derived knockout cell lines, we were able to directly compare the involvement of different endocytic machinery in GLP-1R internalization. Our findings indicate that the receptor internalizes independently of arrestin and is dependent on Gs and Gi/o activation and G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation. Mechanistically, we observed that the receptor undergoes distinct clathrin- and caveolae-mediated internalization in HEK293 cells. This study also investigated the role of arrestins in GLP-1R function and regulation. These insights into key endocytic components that are involved in the GLP-1R internalization pathway could enhance the rational design of GLP-1R therapeutics for type 2 diabetes and other GLP-1R-related diseases.

Functionally Selective Dopamine D1 Receptor Endocytosis and Signaling by Catechol and Noncatechol Agonists

The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) has fundamental roles in voluntary movement and memory and is a validated drug target for neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, previously developed D1R selective agonists possess a catechol moiety which displays poor pharmacokinetic properties. The first selective noncatechol D1R agonists were recently discovered and unexpectedly many of these ligands showed G protein biased signaling. Here, we investigate both catechol and noncatechol D1R agonists to validate potential biased signaling and examine if this impacts agonist-induced D1R endocytosis. We determined that most, but not all, noncatechol agonists display G protein biased signaling at the D1R and have reduced or absent β-arrestin2 recruitment. A notable exception was compound (Cmpd) 19, a noncatechol agonist with full efficacy at both D1R-G protein and D1R-β-arrestin2 pathways. In addition, the catechol ligand A-77636 was a highly potent, super agonist for D1R-β-arrestin2 activity. When examined for agonist-induced D1R endocytosis, balanced agonists SKF-81297 and Cmpd 19 induced robust D1R endocytosis while the G protein biased agonists did not. The β-arrestin2 super agonist, A-77636, showed statistically significant increases in D1R endocytosis. Moreover, β-arrestin2 recruitment efficacy of tested agonists strongly correlated with total D1R endocytosis. Taken together, these results indicate the degree of D1R signaling functional selectivity profoundly impacts D1R endocytosis regardless of pharmacophore. The range of functional selectivity of these D1R agonists will provide valuable tools to further investigate D1R signaling, trafficking and therapeutic potential.

Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool for Structure-Based G Protein-Coupled Receptor Drug Discovery

Understanding protein structures can facilitate the development of therapeutic drugs. Traditionally, protein structures have been determined through experimental approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy. While these methods are effective and are considered the gold standard, they are very resource-intensive and time-consuming, ultimately limiting their scalability. However, with recent developments in computational biology and artificial intelligence (AI), the field of protein prediction has been revolutionized. Innovations like AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold enable protein structure predictions to be made directly from amino acid sequences with remarkable speed and accuracy. Despite the enormous enthusiasm associated with these newly developed AI-approaches, their true potential in structure-based drug discovery remains uncertain. In fact, although these algorithms generally predict overall protein structures well, essential details for computational ligand docking, such as the exact location of amino acid side chains within the binding pocket, are not predicted with the necessary accuracy. Additionally, docking methodologies are considered more as a hypothesis generator rather than a precise predictor of ligand-target interactions, and thus, usually identify many false-positive hits among only a few correctly predicted interactions. In this paper, we are reviewing the latest development in this cutting-edge field with emphasis on the GPCR target class to assess the potential role of AI approaches in structure-based drug discovery.

How Ligands Achieve Biased Signaling toward Arrestins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the effects of various endogenous and extracellular stimuli through multiple transducers, including heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCR kinases (GRKs), and arrestins. Biased signaling, which preferentially activates certain G protein or GRK/arrestin signaling pathways, provides great opportunities for developing drugs with enhanced therapeutic efficacy and minimized side effects. In this Review, we review studies addressing the structural dynamics of GPCRs bound to balanced and biased ligands and current consensus on how ligand-receptor interactions determine signaling outcomes. We also examine the conformational changes in GPCRs when in complex with G proteins, arrestins, and GRKs, highlighting a more profound impact of signal transducers on receptor rearrangements compared with biased ligands. This evidence supports the idea that biased signaling can be achieved through the promotion of multiple conformational states by biased agonists and the stabilization of specific active conformations by individual signal transducers.

Genetic variants of accessory proteins and G proteins in human genetic disease

We present a series of three articles on the genetics and pharmacogenetics of G protein- coupled receptors (GPCR). In the first article, we discuss genetic variants of the G protein subunits and accessory proteins that are associated with human phenotypes; in the second article, we build upon this to discuss "G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) gene variants and human genetic disease" and in the third article, we survey "G protein-coupled receptor pharmacogenomics". In the present article, we review the processes of ligand binding, GPCR activation, inactivation, and receptor trafficking to the membrane in the context of human genetic disease resulting from pathogenic variants of accessory proteins and G proteins. Pathogenic variants of the genes encoding G protein α and β subunits are examined in diverse phenotypes. Variants in the genes encoding accessory proteins that modify or organize G protein coupling have been associated with disease; these include the contribution of variants of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) to hypertension; the role of variants of activator of G protein signaling type III in phenotypes such as hypoxia; the contribution of variation at the RGS10 gene to short stature and immunological compromise; and the involvement of variants of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), such as GRK4, in hypertension. Variation in genes that encode proteins involved in GPCR signaling are outlined in the context of the changes in structure and function that may be associated with human phenotypes.

CBD and the 5-HT1A receptor: A medicinal and pharmacological review

Cannabidiol (CBD), a phytocannabinoid, has emerged as a promising candidate for addressing a wide array of symptoms. It has the ability to bind to multiple proteins and receptors, including 5-HT1AR, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), and cannabinoid receptors. However, CBD's pharmacodynamic interaction with 5-HT1AR and its medicinal outcomes are still debated. This review explores recent literature to elucidate these questions, highlighting the neurotherapeutic outcomes of this pharmacodynamic interaction and proposing a signaling pathway underlying the mechanism by which CBD desensitizes 5-HT1AR signaling. A comprehensive survey of the literature underscores CBD's multifaceted neurotherapeutic effects, which include antidepressant, anxiolytic, neuroprotective, antipsychotic, antiemetic, anti-allodynic, anti-epileptic, anti-degenerative, and addiction-treating properties, attributable in part to its interactions with 5-HT1AR. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the pharmacodynamic interaction between CBD and 5-HT1AR is contingent upon dosage. Moreover, we propose that CBD can induce desensitization of 5-HT1AR via both homologous and heterologous mechanisms. Homologous desensitization involves the recruitment of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) and β-arrestin, leading to receptor endocytosis. In contrast, heterologous desensitization is mediated by an elevated intracellular calcium level or activation of protein kinases, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), through the activity of other receptors.

Endosomal chemokine receptor signalosomes regulate central mechanisms underlying cell migration

Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.

Sustained Gαs signaling mediated by vasopressin type 2 receptors is ligand dependent but endocytosis and β-arrestin independent

The canonical model of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling comprises G protein activation at the plasma membrane, followed by receptor phosphorylation and β-arrestin recruitment, which leads to receptor desensitization and endocytosis. However, the activation of some GPCRs results in sustained G protein signaling from intracellular compartments in a manner reportedly dependent on β-arrestin and receptor endocytosis. The vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R) can be activated by two structurally similar hormones, arginine vasopressin and oxytocin, both of which stimulate the production of the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). In this study, we showed that sustained V2R signaling and endosomal Gαs (stimulatory G protein alpha subunit) translocation could occur without β-arrestin-mediated receptor endocytosis and was primarily controlled by the residence time of the ligand on the receptor. β-Arrestin had opposing effects on sustained signaling: It facilitated receptor internalization into endosomes, where it activated Gαs, and promoted cAMP production from this compartment. However, β-arrestin-mediated receptor endocytosis also induced ligand dissociation due to the acidic endosomal environment, thereby limiting the signal. Overall, our data suggest that signals originating at the plasma membrane play a dominant role in sustained V2R signaling stimulated by arginine vasopressin.

Arrestin-3 binds parkin and enhances parkin-dependent mitophagy

Arrestins were discovered for their role in homologous desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Later non-visual arrestins were shown to regulate several signaling pathways. Some of these pathways require arrestin binding to GPCRs, the regulation of others is receptor independent. Here, we demonstrate that arrestin-3 binds the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin via multiple sites, preferentially interacting with its RING0 domain. Identification of the parkin domains involved suggests that arrestin-3 likely relieves parkin autoinhibition and/or stabilizes the enzymatically active "open" conformation of parkin. Arrestin-3 binding enhances ubiquitination by parkin of the mitochondrial protein mitofusin-1 and facilitates parkin-mediated mitophagy in HeLa cells. Furthermore, arrestin-3 and its mutant with enhanced parkin binding rescue mitofusin-1 ubiquitination and mitophagy in the presence of the Parkinson's disease-associated R275W parkin mutant, which is defective in both functions. Thus, modulation of parkin activity via arrestin-3 might be a novel strategy of anti-parkinsonian therapy.

The dependence of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons on NGF: The case in Alzheimer pathology

This chapter discusses the dependency of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) on endogenous nerve growth factor (NGF) for the structural and physiologic maintenance of the neuronal cell somata, axonal projections, and terminal synapses. It covers the discovery of NGF and the occurrence of a CNS neurotrophin family and their cognate receptors and their signaling mechanisms. It concludes with a description of the NGF metabolic pathway and its dysregulation in Alzheimer disease (AD) and Down syndrome pathology, explaining the progressive atrophy of BFCNs, which starts at preclinical stages and is reflected in body fluid biomarkers.

Endomembrane GPCR signaling: 15 years on, the quest continues

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell receptors. They mediate the effects of a multitude of endogenous and exogenous cues, are deeply involved in human physiology and disease, and are major pharmacological targets. Whereas GPCRs were long thought to signal exclusively at the plasma membrane, research over the past 15 years has revealed that they also signal via classical G-protein-mediated pathways on membranes of intracellular organelles such as endosomes and the Golgi complex. This review provides an overview of recent advances and emerging concepts related to endomembrane GPCR signaling, as well as ongoing research aimed at a better understanding of its mechanisms, physiological relevance, and potential therapeutic applications.

Flavors of GPCR signaling bias

GPCRs are inherently flexible molecules existing in an equilibrium of multiple conformations. Binding of GPCR agonists shifts this equilibrium. Certain agonists can increase the fraction of active-like conformations that predispose the receptor to coupling to a particular signal transducer or a select group of transducers. Such agonists are called biased, in contrast to balanced agonists that facilitate signaling via all transducers the receptor couples to. These biased agonists preferentially channel the signaling of a GPCR to particular G proteins, GRKs, or arrestins. Preferential activation of particular G protein or arrestin subtypes can be beneficial, as it would reduce unwanted on-target side effects, widening the therapeutic window. However, biasing GPCRs has two important limitations: a) complete bias is impossible due to inherent flexibility of GPCRs; b) receptor-independent functions of signal transducer proteins cannot be directly affected by GPCR ligands or differential receptor barcoding by GRK phosphorylation. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Ligand Bias".

Structural plasticity of arrestin-G protein coupled receptor complexes as a molecular determinant of signaling

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critically regulated by arrestins. In this study, high-resolution data was combined with molecular dynamics simulations to infer the determinants of β-arrestin 1 (βarr1)-GPCR coupling, using the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) as a model system. The study highlighted the extremely high plasticity of βarr1-GPCR complexes, dependent on receptor type, state, and membrane environment. The multiple functions of receptor-bound βarr1 are likely determined by the interplay of intrinsic flexibility and collective motions both as a bi-domain protein and as a whole. The two major collective motions of the whole βarr1, consisting in rotation parallel to the membrane plane and inclination with respect to the receptor main axis, are distinctly linked to the two intermolecular interfaces involved in tail and core interactions. The intermolecular dynamic coupling between βarr1 and V2R depends on the allosteric effect of the agonist arginine-vasopressin (AVP). In the absence of AVP the dynamic coupling concerns only tail interactions, while in the presence of AVP it involves both tail and core interactions. This suggests that constitutive and agonist-induced arrestin-receptor dynamic coupling is linked to distinct arrestin functions.

Signaling by neutrophil G protein-coupled receptors that regulate the release of superoxide anions

In human peripheral blood, the neutrophil granulocytes (neutrophils) are the most abundant white blood cells. These professional phagocytes are rapidly recruited from the bloodstream to inflamed tissues by chemotactic factors that signal danger. Neutrophils, which express many receptors that are members of the large family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are critical for the elimination of pathogens and inflammatory insults, as well as for the resolution of inflammation leading to tissue repair. Danger signaling molecular patterns such as the N-formylated peptides that are formed during bacterial and mitochondrial protein synthesis and recognized by formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) and free fatty acids recognized by free fatty acid receptors (FFARs) regulate neutrophil functions. Short peptides and short-chain fatty acids activate FPR1 and FFA2R, respectively, while longer peptides and fatty acids activate FPR2 and GPR84, respectively. The activation profiles of these receptors include the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. Activation of the oxidase and the production of ROS are processes that are regulated by proinflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor α and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The receptors have signaling and functional similarities, although there are also important differences, not only between the two closely related neutrophil FPRs, but also between the FPRs and the FFARs. In neutrophils, these receptors never walk alone, and additional mechanistic insights into the regulation of the GPCRs and the novel regulatory mechanisms underlying the activation of NADPH oxidase advance our understanding of the role of receptor transactivation in the regulation of inflammatory reactions.

Receptor Determinants for β-Arrestin Functional Specificity at C-X-C Chemokine Receptor 5

β-arrestins are multifaceted adaptor proteins that mediate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, internalization, and signaling. It is emerging that receptor-specific determinants specify these divergent functions at GPCRs, yet this remains poorly understood. Here, we set out to identify the receptor determinants responsible for β-arrestin-mediated regulation of the chemokine receptor C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CXCR5). Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we show that β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 are dose-dependently recruited to CXCR5 by its cognate ligand C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13). The carboxy-terminal tail of CXCR5 contains several serine/threonine residues that can be divided into three discrete phospho-site clusters based on their position relative to transmembrane domain 7. Mutagenesis experiments revealed that the distal and medial phospho-site clusters, but not the proximal, are required for agonist-stimulated β-arrestin1 or β-arrestin2 recruitment to CXCR5. Consistent with this, we provide evidence that the distal and medial, but not proximal, phospho-site clusters are required for receptor desensitization. Surprisingly, the individual phospho-site clusters are not required for agonist-stimulated internalization of CXCR5. Further, we show that CXCL13-stimulated CXCR5 internalization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, but not desensitization, remain intact in human embryonic kidney 293 cells lacking β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2. Our study provides evidence that β-arrestins are recruited to CXCR5 and are required for desensitization but are dispensable for internalization or signaling, suggesting that discrete receptor determinants specify the divergent functions of β-arrestins. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: C-X-C motif ligand 13 (CXCL13) and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CXCR5) are important in the immune system and are linked to diseases, yet regulation of CXCR5 signaling remains poorly understood. We provide evidence that a phospho-site cluster located at the extreme distal carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor is responsible for β-arrestin recruitment and receptor desensitization. β-arrestins are not required for CXCL13-stimulated internalization or signaling, indicating that β-arrestins perform only one of their functions at CXCR5 and that discrete receptor determinants specify the divergent functions of β-arrestins.

Distinct Role of GRK3 in Platelet Activation by Desensitization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

BACKGROUND

 Many platelet agonists mediate their cellular effects through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to induce platelet activation, and GPCR kinases (GRKs) have been demonstrated to have crucial roles in most GPCR functions in other cell types. Here, we investigated the functional role of GRK3 and the molecular basis for the regulation of GPCR desensitization by GRK3 in platelets.

METHODS

 We used mice lacking GRK3 as well as β-arrestin2, which has been shown to be important in GPCR function in platelets.

RESULTS

 Platelet aggregation and dense granule secretion induced by 2-MeSADP, U46619, thrombin, and AYPGKF were significantly potentiated in both GRK3 -/- and β-arrestin2 -/- platelets compared with wild-type (WT) platelets, whereas non-GPCR agonist collagen-induced platelet aggregation and secretion were not affected. We have previously shown that GRK6 is not involved in the regulation of Gq-coupled 5HT2A and Gz-coupled α2A adrenergic receptors. Interestingly, in contrast to GRK6, platelet aggregation induced by costimulation of serotonin and epinephrine, which activate 5-HT2A and α2A adrenergic receptors, respectively, was significantly potentiated in GRK3 -/- platelets, suggesting that GRK3 is involved in general GPCR regulation. In addition, platelet aggregation in response to the second challenge of adenosine diphosphate was restored in GRK3 -/- platelets, whereas restimulation of the agonist failed to induce aggregation in WT platelets, confirming that GRK3 contributes to general GPCR desensitization. Furthermore, 2-MeSADP- and AYPGKF-induced AKT and ERK phosphorylation were significantly potentiated in GRK3 -/- platelets. Finally, GRK3 -/- mice showed shorter tail bleeding times compared with WT, indicating that GRK3 -/- mice is more susceptible to hemostasis.

CONCLUSION

 GRK3 plays a crucial role in the regulation of platelet activation through general GPCR desensitization in platelets.

SNX9 family mediates βarrestin-independent GPCR endocytosis

Agonist-stimulated GPCR endocytosis typically occurs via the multi-faceted adaptor proteins known as βarrestins. However, endocytosis of several GPCRs occurs independently of β-arrestins, suggesting an additional mode of GPCR endocytosis, but the mechanisms remain unknown. Here we provide evidence that sorting nexin 9 (SNX9), a previously described endocytic remodeling protein, functions as a novel cargo adaptor that promotes agonist-stimulated GPCR endocytosis. We show that SNX9 and SNX18, but not β-arrestins, are necessary for endocytosis of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. SNX9 is recruited to CXCR4 at the plasma membrane and interacts directly with the carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. We also provide evidence that some receptors do not require SNX9 and SNX18 nor β-arrestins for endocytosis, suggesting additional modes for GPCR endocytosis. These results provide novel insights into the mechanisms regulating GPCR trafficking and broaden our overall understanding of GPCR regulation.

Unveiling the intracellular dynamics of α4β2 nAChR-mediated ERK activation through the interplay of arrestin, Gβγ, and PKCβII

AIMS

In contrast to G protein-coupled receptors or receptor tyrosine kinases, the mechanism underlying ERK activation through nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), members of the ligand-gated ion channel family, remains poorly elucidated. This study aimed to delineate the signaling pathway responsible for ERK activation by the α4β2 nAChR subtype, which is implicated in nicotine addiction and various mental disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Loss-of-function strategies and mutants of arrestin2/PKCβII with distinct functional characteristics were employed to identify the cellular components and processes involved in ERK activation.

KEY FINDINGS

ERK activation via α4β2 nAChR was observed within the nucleus and necessitated the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 and PKCβII, which exhibited mutual augmentation. Activation of PKCβII by α4β2 nAChR stimulation facilitated the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 by enhancing its interaction with importin β1. Apart from scaffolding ERK activation in the nucleus, arrestin2, in cooperation with GRK2, facilitated the activation of the Src/Syk/PKCβII signaling cascade, leading to the nuclear entry of PKCβII in a Gβγ-dependent manner. Upon nuclear localization, PKCβII underwent ubiquitination by Mdm2 and interacted with MEK1, resulting in ERK activation. In summary, α4β2 nAChR-mediated ERK activation in the nucleus involves the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 and PKCβII, which is reciprocally facilitated via positive feedback augmentation.

SIGNIFICANCE

As α4β2 nAChRs play a pivotal role in various cellular processes including drug addiction and mental disorders, our findings will offer insights into understanding the pathogenesis of α4β2 nAChR-related disorders and may facilitate the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.

The Ubiquitination of Arrestin3 within the Nucleus Triggers the Nuclear Export of Mdm2, Which, in Turn, Mediates the Ubiquitination of GRK2 in the Cytosol

GRK2 and arrestin3, key players in the functional regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are ubiquitinated by Mdm2, a nuclear protein. The agonist-induced increase in arrestin3 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus, underscoring the crucial role of its nuclear translocation in this process. The ubiquitination of arrestin3 occurs in the nucleus, highlighting the pivotal role of its nuclear translocation in this process. In contrast, GRK2 cannot translocate into the nucleus; thus, facilitation of the cytosolic translocation of nuclear Mdm2 is required to ubiquitinate GRK2 in the cytosol. Among the explored cellular components and processes, arrestin, Gβγ, clathrin, and receptor phosphorylation were found to be required for the nuclear import of arrestin3, the ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus, nuclear export of Mdm2, and the ubiquitination of GRK2 in the cytosol. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that agonist-induced ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus is interconnected with cytosolic GRK2 ubiquitination.

Insight into the regulatory mechanism of β-arrestin2 and its emerging role in diseases

β-arrestin2, a member of the arrestin family, mediates the desensitization and internalization of most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and functions as a scaffold protein in signalling pathways. Previous studies have demonstrated that β-arrestin2 expression is dysregulated in malignant tumours, fibrotic diseases, cardiovascular diseases and metabolic diseases, suggesting its pathological roles. Transcription and post-transcriptional modifications can affect the expression of β-arrestin2. Furthermore, post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation and S-nitrosylation affect the cellular localization of β-arrestin2 and its interaction with downstream signalling molecules, which further regulate the activity of β-arrestin2. This review summarizes the structure and function of β-arrestin2 and reveals the mechanisms involved in the regulation of β-arrestin2 at multiple levels. Additionally, recent studies on the role of β-arrestin2 in some major diseases and its therapeutic prospects have been discussed to provide a reference for the development of drugs targeting β-arrestin2.

Ternary model structural complex of C5a, C5aR2, and β-arrestin1

Complement component fragment 5a (C5a) is one of the potent proinflammatory modulators of the complement system. C5a recruits two genomically related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), like C5aR1 and C5aR2, constituting a binary complex. The C5a-C5aR1/C5aR2 binary complexes involve other transducer proteins like heterotrimeric G-proteins and β-arrestins to generate the fully active ternary complexes that trigger intracellular signaling through downstream effector molecules in tissues. In the absence of structural data, we had recently developed highly refined model structures of C5aR2 in its inactive (free), meta-active (complexed to the CT-peptide of C5a), and active (complexed to C5a) state embedded to a model palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) bilayer. Compared to C5aR1, C5aR2 is established as a noncanonical GPCR, as it recruits and signals through β-arrestins rather than G-proteins. Notably, structural understanding of the ternary complex involving C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin is currently unknown. The current study has attempted to fill the gap by generating a highly refined, fully active ternary model structural complex of the C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 embedded in a model POPC bilayer. The computational modeling, 500 ns molecular dynamics (MD) studies, and the principal component analysis (PCA), including the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM PBSA) based data presented in this study, provide an experimentally testable hypothesis about C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 extendable to other such ternary systems. The model ternary complex of C5a-C5aR2-β-arrestin1 will further enrich the current structural understanding related to the interaction of β-arrestins with the C5a-C5aR2 system.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

GPCR-dependent and -independent arrestin signaling

Biological activity of free arrestins is often overlooked. Based on available data, we compare arrestin-mediated signaling that requires and does not require binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Receptor-bound arrestins activate ERK1/2, Src, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Yet, arrestin-3 regulation of Src family member Fgr does not appear to involve receptors. Free arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK family kinases, preferentially binds E3 ubiquitin ligases Mdm2 and parkin, and facilitates parkin-dependent mitophagy. The binding of arrestins to microtubules and calmodulin and their function in focal adhesion disassembly and apoptosis also do not involve receptors. Biased GPCR ligands and the phosphorylation barcode can only affect receptor-dependent arrestin signaling. Thus, elucidation of receptor dependence or independence of arrestin functions has important scientific and therapeutic implications.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Century of Research and Discovery

GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors), also known as 7 transmembrane domain receptors, are the largest receptor family in the human genome, with ≈800 members. GPCRs regulate nearly every aspect of human physiology and disease, thus serving as important drug targets in cardiovascular disease. Sharing a conserved structure comprised of 7 transmembrane α-helices, GPCRs couple to heterotrimeric G-proteins, GPCR kinases, and β-arrestins, promoting downstream signaling through second messengers and other intracellular signaling pathways. GPCR drug development has led to important cardiovascular therapies, such as antagonists of β-adrenergic and angiotensin II receptors for heart failure and hypertension, and agonists of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor for reducing adverse cardiovascular events and other emerging indications. There continues to be a major interest in GPCR drug development in cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease, driven by advances in GPCR mechanistic studies and structure-based drug design. This review recounts the rich history of GPCR research, including the current state of clinically used GPCR drugs, and highlights newly discovered aspects of GPCR biology and promising directions for future investigation. As additional mechanisms for regulating GPCR signaling are uncovered, new strategies for targeting these ubiquitous receptors hold tremendous promise for the field of cardiovascular medicine.

Arrestins: A Small Family of Multi-Functional Proteins

The first member of the arrestin family, visual arrestin-1, was discovered in the late 1970s. Later, the other three mammalian subtypes were identified and cloned. The first described function was regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling: arrestins bind active phosphorylated GPCRs, blocking their coupling to G proteins. It was later discovered that receptor-bound and free arrestins interact with numerous proteins, regulating GPCR trafficking and various signaling pathways, including those that determine cell fate. Arrestins have no enzymatic activity; they function by organizing multi-protein complexes and localizing their interaction partners to particular cellular compartments. Today we understand the molecular mechanism of arrestin interactions with GPCRs better than the mechanisms underlying other functions. However, even limited knowledge enabled the construction of signaling-biased arrestin mutants and extraction of biologically active monofunctional peptides from these multifunctional proteins. Manipulation of cellular signaling with arrestin-based tools has research and likely therapeutic potential: re-engineered proteins and their parts can produce effects that conventional small-molecule drugs cannot.

MicroRNA regulation of islet and enteroendocrine peptides: Physiology and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes

The pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with dysregulation of glucoregulatory hormones, including both islet and enteroendocrine peptides. Microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNA sequences which post transcriptionally inhibit protein synthesis by binding to complementary messenger RNA (mRNA). Essential for normal cell activities, including proliferation and apoptosis, dysregulation of these noncoding RNA molecules have been linked to several diseases, including diabetes, where alterations in miRNA expression within pancreatic islets have been observed. This may occur as a compensatory mechanism to maintain beta-cell mass/function (e.g., downregulation of miR-7), or conversely, lead to further beta-cell demise and disease progression (e.g., upregulation of miR-187). Thus, targeting miRNAs has potential for novel diagnostic and therapeutic applications in T2D. This is reinforced by the success seen to date with miRNA-based therapeutics for other conditions currently in clinical trials. In this review, differential expression of miRNAs in human islets associated with T2D will be discussed along with further consideration of their effects on the production and secretion of islet and incretin hormones. This analysis further unravels the therapeutic potential of miRNAs and offers insights into novel strategies for T2D management.

Arrestin beta-2 deficiency exacerbates periodontal inflammation by mediating activating transcription factor 6 activation and abnormal remodelling of the extracellular matrix

AIM

To investigate the specific role of arrestin beta-2 (ARRB2) in the progression of periodontitis and the underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing data were used to analyse gene expression in periodontal tissues from healthy controls and patients with periodontitis. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting and immunohistochemical staining were performed to detect the expression of ARRB2. Furthermore, a ligature-induced periodontitis model was created. Using radiographic and histological methods, RNA sequencing and luciferase assay, the role of ARRB2 in periodontitis and the underlying mechanisms were explored. Finally, the therapeutic effect of melatonin, an inhibitor of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), on periodontitis in mice was assessed in both in vivo and in vitro experiments.

RESULTS

ARRB2 expression was up-regulated in inflammatory periodontal tissue. In the ligature-induced mouse model, Arrb2 knockout exacerbated alveolar bone loss (ABL) and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. ARRB2 exerted a negative regulatory effect on ATF6, an essential targeted gene. Melatonin ameliorated ABL and an imbalance in ECM remodelling in Arrb2-deficient periodontitis mice.

CONCLUSIONS

ARRB2 mediates ECM remodelling via inhibition of the ATF6 signalling pathway, which ultimately exerts a protective effect on periodontal tissues.

Local anesthetics inhibit muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated calcium responses and the recruitment of β-arrestin in HSY human parotid cells

OBJECTIVES

Local anesthetics act on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs); thus, their potential as allosteric modulators of GPCRs has attracted attention. Intracellular signaling via GPCRs involves both G-protein- and β-arrestin-mediated pathways. To determine the effects of local anesthetics on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), a family of GPCRs, we analyzed the effects of local anesthetics on mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses and formation of receptor-β-arrestin complexes in the HSY human parotid cell line.

METHODS

Ca2+ responses were monitored by fura-2 spectrofluorimetry. Ligand-induced interactions between mAChR and β-arrestin were examined using a β-arrestin GPCR assay kit.

RESULTS

Lidocaine reduced mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses but did not change the intracellular Ca2+ concentration in non-stimulated cells. The membrane-impermeant lidocaine analog QX314 and procaine inhibited mAChR-mediated Ca2+ responses, with EC50 values of 48.0 and 20.4 μM, respectively, for 50 μM carbachol-stimulated Ca2+ responses. In the absence of extracellular Ca2+, the pretreatment of cells with QX314 reduced carbachol-induced Ca2+ release, indicating that QX314 reduced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Lidocaine and QX314 did not affect store-operated Ca2+ entry as they did not alter the thapsigargin-induced Ca2+ response. QX314 and procaine reduced the carbachol-mediated recruitment of β-arrestin, and administration of procaine suppressed pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion in mice.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthetics, including QX314, act on mAChR to reduce carbachol-induced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and the recruitment of β-arrestin. These findings support the notion that local anesthetics and their derivatives are starting points for the development of functional allosteric modulators of mAChR.

Beneath the surface: endosomal GPCR signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) located at the cell surface bind extracellular ligands and convey intracellular signals via activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Traditionally, G protein signaling was viewed to occur exclusively at this subcellular region followed by rapid desensitization facilitated by β-arrestin (βarr)-mediated G protein uncoupling and receptor internalization. However, emerging evidence over the past 15 years suggests that these βarr-mediated events do not necessarily terminate receptor signaling and that some GPCRs continue to activate G proteins after having been internalized into endosomes. Here, we review the recently elucidated mechanistic basis underlying endosomal GPCR signaling and discuss physiological implications and pharmacological targeting of this newly appreciated signaling mode.

Identifying and Assessing Putative Allosteric Sites and Modulators for CXCR4 Predicted through Network Modeling and Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is a critical target for the treatment of several cancer types and HIV-1 infections. While orthosteric and allosteric modulators have been developed targeting its extracellular or transmembrane regions, the intramembrane region of CXCR4 may also include allosteric binding sites suitable for the development of allosteric drugs. To investigate this, we apply the Gaussian Network Model (GNM) to the monomeric and dimeric forms of CXCR4 to identify residues essential for its local and global motions located in the hinge regions of the protein. Residue interaction network (RIN) analysis suggests hub residues that participate in allosteric communication throughout the receptor. Mutual residues from the network models reside in regions with a high capacity to alter receptor dynamics upon ligand binding. We then investigate the druggability of these potential allosteric regions using the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) approach, revealing two putative allosteric sites on the monomer and three on the homodimer. Two screening campaigns with Glide and SILCS-Monte Carlo docking using FDA-approved drugs suggest 20 putative hit compounds including antifungal drugs, anticancer agents, HIV protease inhibitors, and antimalarial drugs. In vitro assays considering mAB 12G5 and CXCL12 demonstrate both positive and negative allosteric activities of these compounds, supporting our computational approach. However, in vivo functional assays based on the recruitment of β-arrestin to CXCR4 do not show significant agonism and antagonism at a single compound concentration. The present computational pipeline brings a new perspective to computer-aided drug design by combining conformational dynamics based on network analysis and cosolvent analysis based on the SILCS technology to identify putative allosteric binding sites using CXCR4 as a showcase.

Function and regulation of GPR84 in human neutrophils

Human neutrophils are components of the innate immune system and are the most abundant white blood cells in the circulation. They are professional phagocytes and express several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are essential for proper neutrophil functions. So far, the two formyl peptide receptors, FPR1 and FPR2, have been the most extensively studied group of neutrophil GPCRs, but recently, a new group, the free fatty acid (FFA) receptors, has attracted growing attention. Neutrophils express two FFA receptors, GPR84 and FFA2, which sense medium- and short-chain fatty acids respectively, and display similar activation profiles. The exact pathophysiological role of GPR84 is not yet fully understood, but it is generally regarded as a pro-inflammatory receptor that mediates neutrophil activation. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of how GPR84 affects human neutrophil functions and discuss the regulatory mechanisms that control these responses, focusing on the similarities and differences in comparison to the two FPRs and FFA2. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue GPR84 Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.10/issuetoc.

CMV-encoded GPCRs in infection, disease, and pathogenesis

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven-transmembrane domain proteins that modulate cellular processes in response to external stimuli. These receptors represent the largest family of membrane proteins, and in mammals, their signaling regulates important physiological functions, such as vision, taste, and olfaction. Many organisms, including yeast, slime molds, and viruses encode GPCRs. Cytomegaloviruses (CMVs) are large, betaherpesviruses, that encode viral GPCRs (vGPCRs). Human CMV (HCMV) encodes four vGPCRs, including UL33, UL78, US27, and US28. Each of these vGPCRs, as well as their rodent and primate orthologues, have been investigated for their contributions to viral infection and disease. Herein, we discuss how the CMV vGPCRs function during lytic and latent infection, as well as our understanding of how they impact viral pathogenesis.

The role of P2Y6 receptor in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases

The purinergic receptor P2Y6 receptor (P2Y6R) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) family. P2Y6R is widely expressed in various cell types and plays a critical role in physiological processes, where it is activated by extracellular uridine diphosphate (UDP) and mobilizes Ca2+ via the Gαq/11 protein pathway. We have recently discovered the pathophysiological role of P2Y6R in cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Furthermore, we uncovered the redox-dependent internalization of P2Y6R. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological activity of P2Y6R in cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases. Additionally, we discuss the concept of atypical internalization control of GPCRs, which may be applied in the prevention and treatment of intestinal inflammation and cardiovascular remodeling.

β-adrenergic receptor signaling mediated by β-arrestins and its potential role in heart failure

The lethality of heart failure (HF), particularly in the context of post-acute sequelae SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC)-related myocarditis, necessitates the discovery of the cellular pathways implicated in cardiovascular disease (CVD). We summarize the signaling mechanisms of the catecholamine-binding β-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs), with an emphasis on the role of β-arrestins. β-ARs, a subset of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), canonically propagate signals through heterotrimeric G proteins. However, since their discovery in the late 1980s, β-arrestins have been shown to, both (i) quench G protein signaling and (ii) initiate their own independent signaling cascades, which is influenced by post-translational modifications. β-arrestin-biased agonism by the beta-blocker carvedilol and its allosteric modulation can serve a cardioprotective role. The increasingly labyrinthine nature of GPCR signaling suggests that ligand-dependent β-AR signaling, either stimulated by an agonist or blocked by an antagonist, is selectively enhanced or suppressed by allosteric modulations, which are orchestrated by novel drugs or endogenous post-translational modifications.

The multifaceted functions of β-arrestins and their therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases

Arrestins are multifunctional proteins that regulate G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, signaling, and internalization. The arrestin family consists of four subtypes: visual arrestin1, β-arrestin1, β-arrestin2, and visual arrestin-4. Recent studies have revealed the multifunctional roles of β-arrestins beyond GPCR signaling, including scaffolding and adapter functions, and physically interacting with non-GPCR receptors. Increasing evidence suggests that β-arrestins are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). β-arrestins physically interact with γ-secretase, leading to increased production and accumulation of amyloid-beta in AD. Furthermore, β-arrestin oligomers inhibit the autophagy cargo receptor p62/SQSTM1, resulting in tau accumulation and aggregation in FTD. In PD, β-arrestins are upregulated in postmortem brain tissue and an MPTP model, and the β2AR regulates SNCA gene expression. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2, and describe their physiological functions and roles in neurodegenerative diseases. The multifaceted roles of β-arrestins and their involvement in neurodegenerative diseases suggest that they may serve as promising therapeutic targets.

Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in β2 -adrenoceptor-mediated glucose uptake

Truncation of the C-terminal tail of the β2 -AR, transfection of βARKct or over-expression of a kinase-dead GRK mutant reduces isoprenaline-stimulated glucose uptake, indicating that GRK is important for this response. We explored whether phosphorylation of the β2 -AR by GRK2 has a role in glucose uptake or if this response is related to the role of GRK2 as a scaffolding protein. CHO-GLUT4myc cells expressing wild-type and mutant β2 -ARs were generated and receptor affinity for [3 H]-CGP12177A and density of binding sites determined together with the affinity of isoprenaline and BRL37344. Following receptor activation by β2 -AR agonists, cAMP accumulation, GLUT4 translocation, [3 H]-2-deoxyglucose uptake, and β2 -AR internalization were measured. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer was used to investigate interactions between β2 -AR and β-arrestin2 or between β2 -AR and GRK2. Glucose uptake after siRNA knockdown or GRK inhibitors was measured in response to β2 -AR agonists. BRL37344 was a poor partial agonist for cAMP generation but displayed similar potency and efficacy to isoprenaline for glucose uptake and GLUT4 translocation. These responses to β2 -AR agonists occurred in CHO-GLUT4myc cells expressing β2 -ARs lacking GRK or GRK/PKA phosphorylation sites as well as in cells expressing the wild-type β2 -AR. However, β2 -ARs lacking phosphorylation sites failed to recruit β-arrestin2 and did not internalize. GRK2 knock-down or GRK2 inhibitors decreased isoprenaline-stimulated glucose uptake in rat L6 skeletal muscle cells. Thus, GRK phosphorylation of the β2 -AR is not associated with isoprenaline- or BRL37344-stimulated glucose uptake. However, GRKs acting as scaffold proteins are important for glucose uptake as GRK2 knock-down or GRK2 inhibition reduces isoprenaline-stimulated glucose uptake.

From membrane to nucleus: A three-wave hypothesis of cAMP signaling

For many decades, our understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity and cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling was limited exclusively to the plasma membrane. However, a growing body of evidence has challenged this view by introducing the concept of endocytosis-dependent GPCR signaling. This emerging paradigm emphasizes not only the sustained production of cAMP but also its precise subcellular localization, thus transforming our understanding of the spatiotemporal organization of this process. Starting from this alternative point of view, our recent work sheds light on the role of an endocytosis-dependent calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum in the control of nuclear cAMP levels. This is achieved through the activation of local soluble adenylyl cyclase, which in turn regulates the activation of local protein kinase A (PKA) and downstream transcriptional events. In this review, we explore the dynamic evolution of research on cyclic AMP signaling, including the findings that led us to formulate the novel three-wave hypothesis. We delve into how we abandoned the paradigm of cAMP generation limited to the plasma membrane and the changing perspectives on the rate-limiting step in nuclear PKA activation.

Molecular basis of opioid receptor signaling

Opioids are used for pain management despite the side effects that contribute to the opioid crisis. The pursuit of non-addictive opioid analgesics remains unattained due to the unresolved intricacies of opioid actions, receptor signaling cascades, and neuronal plasticity. Advancements in structural, molecular, and computational tools illuminate the dynamic interplay between opioids and opioid receptors, as well as the molecular determinants of signaling pathways, which are potentially interlinked with pharmacological responses. Here, we review the molecular basis of opioid receptor signaling with a focus on the structures of opioid receptors bound to endogenous peptides or pharmacological agents. These insights unveil specific interactions that dictate ligand selectivity and likely their distinctive pharmacological profiles. Biochemical analysis further unveils molecular features governing opioid receptor signaling. Simultaneously, the synergy between computational biology and medicinal chemistry continues to expedite the discovery of novel chemotypes with the promise of yielding more efficacious and safer opioid compounds.

Location bias: A "Hidden Variable" in GPCR pharmacology

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of transmembrane receptors and primarily signal through two main effector proteins: G proteins and β-arrestins. Many agonists of GPCRs promote "biased" responses, in which different cellular signaling pathways are activated with varying efficacies. The mechanisms underlying biased signaling have not been fully elucidated, with many potential "hidden variables" that regulate this behavior. One contributor is "location bias," which refers to the generation of unique signaling cascades from a given GPCR depending upon the cellular location at which the receptor is signaling. Here, we review evidence that GPCRs are expressed at and traffic to various subcellular locations and discuss how location bias can impact the pharmacologic properties and characterization of GPCR agonists. We also evaluate how differences in subcellular environments can modulate GPCR signaling, highlight the physiological significance of subcellular GPCR signaling, and discuss the therapeutic potential of exploiting GPCR location bias.

Gαq signalling from endosomes: A new conundrum

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of membrane receptors, and are involved in the transmission of a variety of extracellular stimuli such as hormones, neurotransmitters, light and odorants into intracellular responses. They regulate every aspect of physiology and, for this reason, about one third of all marketed drugs target these receptors. Classically, upon binding to their agonist, GPCRs are thought to activate G-proteins from the plasma membrane and to stop signalling by subsequent desensitisation and endocytosis. However, accumulating evidence indicates that, upon internalisation, some GPCRs can continue to activate G-proteins in endosomes. Importantly, this signalling from endomembranes mediates alternative cellular responses other than signalling at the plasma membrane. Endosomal G-protein signalling and its physiological relevance have been abundantly documented for Gαs - and Gαi -coupled receptors. Recently, some Gαq -coupled receptors have been reported to activate Gαq on endosomes and mediate important cellular processes. However, several questions relative to the series of cellular events required to translate endosomal Gαq activation into cellular responses remain unanswered and constitute a new conundrum. How are these responses in endosomes mediated in the quasi absence of the substrate for the canonical Gαq -activated effector? Is there another effector? Is there another substrate? If so, how does this alternative endosomal effector or substrate produce a downstream signal? This review aims to unravel and discuss these important questions, and proposes possible routes of investigation.

Expression of Untagged Arrestins in E. coli and Their Purification

Purified arrestin proteins are necessary for biochemical, biophysical, and structural studies of these versatile regulators of cell signaling. Described herein is a basic protocol for arrestin expression in Escherichia coli and purification of tag-free wild-type and mutant arrestins. The method includes ammonium sulfate precipitation of arrestins from cell lysates, followed by Heparin-Sepharose chromatography. Depending on the arrestin type and/or mutations, the next step is Q-Sepharose or SP-Sepharose chromatography. In many cases, the nonbinding column is used as a filter to bind contaminants without retaining arrestin. In some cases, both chromatographic steps must be performed sequentially to achieve high purity. Purified arrestins can be concentrated up to 10 mg/ml, remain fully functional, and withstand several cycles of freezing and thawing, provided that the overall salt concentration is maintained at or above physiological levels. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Large-scale expression and purification of arrestins Alternate Protocol: Purification of arrestin-3 and truncated form of arrestin-1-(1-378) Support Protocol: Small-scale test expression of wild-type and mutant arrestins in E. coli.

An insulin-regulated arrestin domain protein controls hepatic glucagon action

Glucagon signaling is essential for maintaining normoglycemia in mammals. The arrestin fold superfamily of proteins controls the trafficking, turnover, and signaling of transmembrane receptors as well as other intracellular signaling functions. Further investigation is needed to understand the in vivo functions of the arrestin domain-containing 4 (ARRDC4) protein family member and whether it is involved in mammalian glucose metabolism. Here, we show that mice with a global deletion of the ARRDC4 protein have impaired glucagon responses and gluconeogenesis at a systemic and molecular level. Mice lacking ARRDC4 exhibited lower glucose levels after fasting and could not suppress gluconeogenesis at the refed state. We also show that ARRDC4 coimmunoprecipitates with the glucagon receptor, and ARRDC4 expression is suppressed by insulin. These results define ARRDC4 as a critical regulator of glucagon signaling and glucose homeostasis and reveal a novel intersection of insulin and glucagon pathways in the liver.

GPCR targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 by inactive β-arrestin

E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 facilitates β-arrestin ubiquitination, leading to the internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this process, β-arrestins bind to Mdm2 and recruit it to the receptor; however, the molecular architecture of the β-arrestin-Mdm2 complex has not been elucidated yet. Here, we identified the β-arrestin-binding region (ABR) on Mdm2 and solved the crystal structure of β-arrestin1 in complex with Mdm2ABR peptide. The acidic residues of Mdm2ABR bind to the positively charged concave side of the β-arrestin1 N-domain. The C-tail of β-arrestin1 is still bound to the N-domain, indicating that Mdm2 binds to the inactive state of β-arrestin1, whereas the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of GPCRs binds to activate β-arrestins. The overlapped binding site of Mdm2 and GPCR C-tails on β-arrestin1 suggests that the binding of GPCR C-tails might trigger the release of Mdm2. Moreover, hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments further show that Mdm2ABR binding to β-arrestin1 induces the interdomain interface to be more dynamic and uncouples the IP6-induced oligomer of β-arrestin1. These results show how the E3 ligase, Mdm2, interacts with β-arrestins to promote the internalization of GPCRs.

GPCR Binding and JNK3 Activation by Arrestin-3 Have Different Structural Requirements

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among the four mammalian subtypes, only arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK3 in cells. In available structures, Lys-295 in the lariat loop of arrestin-3 and its homologue Lys-294 in arrestin-2 directly interact with the activator-attached phosphates. We compared the roles of arrestin-3 conformational equilibrium and Lys-295 in GPCR binding and JNK3 activation. Several mutants with enhanced ability to bind GPCRs showed much lower activity towards JNK3, whereas a mutant that does not bind GPCRs was more active. The subcellular distribution of mutants did not correlate with GPCR recruitment or JNK3 activation. Charge neutralization and reversal mutations of Lys-295 differentially affected receptor binding on different backgrounds but had virtually no effect on JNK3 activation. Thus, GPCR binding and arrestin-3-assisted JNK3 activation have distinct structural requirements, suggesting that facilitation of JNK3 activation is the function of arrestin-3 that is not bound to a GPCR.

Mechanisms of Arrestin-Mediated Signaling

Arrestins were first discovered as proteins that selectively bind active phosphorylated GPCRs and suppress (arrest) their G protein-mediated signaling. Nonvisual arrestins are also recognized as signaling proteins regulating a variety of cellular pathways. Arrestins are highly flexible; they can assume many different conformations. In their receptor-bound conformation, arrestins have higher affinity for a subset of binding partners. This explains how receptor activation regulates certain branches of arrestin-dependent signaling via arrestin recruitment to GPCRs. However, free arrestins are also active molecular entities that regulate other signaling pathways and localize signaling proteins to particular subcellular compartments. Recent findings suggest that the two visuals, arrestin-1 and arrestin-4, which are expressed in photoreceptor cells, not only regulate signaling via binding to photopigments but also interact with several nonreceptor partners, critically affecting the health and survival of photoreceptor cells. Detailed in this overview are GPCR-dependent and independent modes of arrestin-mediated regulation of cellular signaling. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Plasma membrane preassociation drives β-arrestin coupling to receptors and activation

β-arrestin plays a key role in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling and desensitization. Despite recent structural advances, the mechanisms that govern receptor-β-arrestin interactions at the plasma membrane of living cells remain elusive. Here, we combine single-molecule microscopy with molecular dynamics simulations to dissect the complex sequence of events involved in β-arrestin interactions with both receptors and the lipid bilayer. Unexpectedly, our results reveal that β-arrestin spontaneously inserts into the lipid bilayer and transiently interacts with receptors via lateral diffusion on the plasma membrane. Moreover, they indicate that, following receptor interaction, the plasma membrane stabilizes β-arrestin in a longer-lived, membrane-bound state, allowing it to diffuse to clathrin-coated pits separately from the activating receptor. These results expand our current understanding of β-arrestin function at the plasma membrane, revealing a critical role for β-arrestin preassociation with the lipid bilayer in facilitating its interactions with receptors and subsequent activation.

Molecular Mechanisms of PTH/PTHrP Class B GPCR Signaling and Pharmacological Implications

The classical paradigm of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling via G proteins is grounded in a view that downstream responses are relatively transient and confined to the cell surface, but this notion has been revised in recent years following the identification of several receptors that engage in sustained signaling responses from subcellular compartments following internalization of the ligand-receptor complex. This phenomenon was initially discovered for the parathyroid hormone (PTH) type 1 receptor (PTH1R), a vital GPCR for maintaining normal calcium and phosphate levels in the body with the paradoxical ability to build or break down bone in response to PTH binding. The diverse biological processes regulated by this receptor are thought to depend on its capacity to mediate diverse modes of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling. These include transient signaling at the plasma membrane and sustained signaling from internalized PTH1R within early endosomes mediated by PTH. Here we discuss recent structural, cell signaling, and in vivo studies that unveil potential pharmacological outputs of the spatial versus temporal dimension of PTH1R signaling via cAMP. Notably, the combination of molecular dynamics simulations and elastic network model-based methods revealed how precise modulation of PTH signaling responses is achieved through structure-encoded allosteric coupling within the receptor and between the peptide hormone binding site and the G protein coupling interface. The implications of recent findings are now being explored for addressing key questions on how location bias in receptor signaling contributes to pharmacological functions, and how to drug a difficult target such as the PTH1R toward discovering nonpeptidic small molecule candidates for the treatment of metabolic bone and mineral diseases.

GPCR binding and JNK3 activation by arrestin-3 have different structural requirements

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among the four mammalian subtypes, only arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK3 in cells. In available structures, Lys-295 in the lariat loop of arrestin-3 and its homologue Lys-294 in arrestin-2 directly interact with the activator-attached phosphates. We compared the role of arrestin-3 conformational equilibrium and of Lys-295 in GPCR binding and JNK3 activation. Several mutants with enhanced ability to bind GPCRs showed much lower activity towards JNK3, whereas a mutant that does not bind GPCRs was more active. Subcellular distribution of mutants did not correlate with GPCR recruitment or JNK3 activation. Charge neutralization and reversal mutations of Lys-295 differentially affected receptor binding on different backgrounds, but had virtually no effect on JNK3 activation. Thus, GPCR binding and arrestin-3-assisted JNK3 activation have distinct structural requirements, suggesting that facilitation of JNK3 activation is the function of arrestin-3 that is not bound to a GPCR.

Function and dynamics of the intrinsically disordered carboxyl terminus of β2 adrenergic receptor

Advances in structural biology have provided important mechanistic insights into signaling by the transmembrane core of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs); however, much less is known about intrinsically disordered regions such as the carboxyl terminus (CT), which is highly flexible and not visible in GPCR structures. The β2 adrenergic receptor's (β2AR) 71 amino acid CT is a substrate for GPCR kinases and binds β-arrestins to regulate signaling. Here we show that the β2AR CT directly inhibits basal and agonist-stimulated signaling in cell lines lacking β-arrestins. Combining single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal that the negatively charged β2AR-CT serves as an autoinhibitory factor via interacting with the positively charged cytoplasmic surface of the receptor to limit access to G-proteins. The stability of this interaction is influenced by agonists and allosteric modulators, emphasizing that the CT plays important role in allosterically regulating GPCR activation.