1
|
Han X, Chen H, Wang B. Efficacy of brachytherapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: a single-center retrospective clinical study. Cancer Biol Ther 2025; 26:2509200. [PMID: 40405409 PMCID: PMC12118417 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2025.2509200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 05/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/24/2025] Open
Abstract
To explore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of brachytherapy of locally advanced bladder cancer, clinical data of 86 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer treated in the Department of Urology Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, between January 2015 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were categorized into the study (n = 45) and control (n = 41) groups according to the treatment methods. Patients in the study group were treated with brachytherapy (intraoperative implantation of radioactive particles) + neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and those in the control group were treated with NAC. Patients in both groups underwent radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection. Postoperative pathological examinations proved that patients in both groups had urothelial carcinoma at stage pT3-pT4. The endpoints included 3-y locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events after treatment. The efficacy and safety of interstitial implantation of radioactive particles for the treatment of locally advanced bladder cancer were assessed. The patients were followed up for 9-42 months. The 3-y LRFS was significantly higher in the study group (88.9%) than in the control group (60.9%) (p = .003). The 3-y DMFS in the study group (71.1%) and the control group (73.2%) was statistically similar (p = .945). The 3-y DFS and OS were not statistically significant between the two groups (DFS: study group 64.4% vs. control group 51.2%, p = .073; OS: study group 66.7% vs. control group 58.5%, p = .180). Local shifting of the particles was detected in three patients at 1 week to 1 month after the operations in the study group, but no related complications were observed. Blood events (anemia, leukocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia), liver and renal dysfunction, vomiting, diarrhea, and weakness were the major adverse reactions, which were alleviated after symptomatic treatments. The results have not statistically significant differences between the two groups in major adverse reactions. Compared to the NAC group, brachytherapy + NAC significantly prolongs the LRFS of patients with locally advanced urothelial bladder carcinoma who underwent RC + pelvic lymph node dissection. This surgery increases the LRFS, develops better personalized treatment plans, and improves treatment effectiveness. In addition, the treatment is safe and effective, with only limited adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuebing Han
- Department of Urology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Huiqing Chen
- Department of Urology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after trimodal therapy. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2025; 12:1416-1422. [PMID: 38509444 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-01973-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trimodal therapy (TMT) is the most validated bladder-sparing treatment for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (OC UCUB, namely cT2N0M0). However, it is unknown if barriers to the use of TMT or cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences exist according to race/ethnicity. We addressed this knowledge gap. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified OC UCUB patients aged from 18 to 85 treated with radical cystectomy (RC) or TMT. Temporal trends described TMT versus RC use over time. Subsequently, in the subgroup of TMT-treated patients, survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS Among 19,501 assessable patients, 15,336 (79%) underwent RC versus 4165 TMT (21%). Overall, of all races/ethnicities, 16,245 (83.3%) were White Americans, 1215 (6.3%) Hispanics, 1160 (5.9%) African Americans, and 881 (4.5%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. Among TMT-treated patients, 3460 (83.1%) were White Americans, 298 (7.1%) African Americans, 218 (5.3%) Hispanics, and 189 (4.5%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. The lowest rate of TMT use relative to RC and TMT patients was recorded in Hispanics (17.9%). Over time, TMT use increased in White Americans (EAPC: + 4.5%, p = 0.001) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (EAPC: + 5.2%, p = 0.003), but not in others. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed median CSM of 49 months, 41 months, and 34 months and not reached in White Americans, Hispanics, African Americans, and Asian/Pacific Islanders, respectively (p = 0.02). In MCR models, two race/ethnicity subgroups independently predicted either worse (African Americans, HR: 1.20, p = 0.02) or better CSM (Asian/Pacific Islanders, HR: 0.75, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Race/ethnicity affects both access to TMT (lower access in Hispanics) as well as survival after TMT (better in Asians/Pacific Islanders and worse in African Americans).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kikuchi K, Ota I, Segawa T, Ieko Y, Oikawa H, Nakamura R, Ariga H. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in bladder cancer treated with radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2025; 66:272-279. [PMID: 40223651 PMCID: PMC12100478 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraf018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2025] [Revised: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 03/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025]
Abstract
This study evaluated survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with bladder cancer treated with radiotherapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 488 patients across all cancer stages who received radiotherapy at two institutions between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022. Overall survival (OS) was assessed based on treatment intent (radical or palliative) and cancer stage. Among these patients, 304 with Stage II-III disease who underwent radical radiotherapy were further analyzed for OS and prognostic factors using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analysis. In the radical radiotherapy group, median survival times (MSTs) were 43 months for Stage 0-I, 29 months for Stage II-III, and 17 months for Stage IV (M0). In the palliative radiotherapy group, MSTs were 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-25) for M0 and 9 months (95% CI: 7-15) for M1. Among the 304 patients with Stage II-III disease treated with radical radiotherapy, the 3-year OS rate was 43.0%. Hydronephrosis was the only independent prognostic factor significantly associated with worse OS (hazard ratio: 1.915, P < 0.001). Age, sex, stage, treatment era, prophylactic pelvic radiotherapy, chemotherapy and prescribed dose had no significant impact on OS. Radiotherapy remains a viable treatment option for patients at any stage of cancer. Although hydronephrosis negatively affects survival, it should not preclude the use of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koyo Kikuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate 028-3695, Japan
| | - Ibuki Ota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital, 1-4-1 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 020-0066, Japan
| | - Takafumi Segawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital, 1-4-1 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 020-0066, Japan
| | - Yoshiro Ieko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate 028-3695, Japan
| | - Hirobumi Oikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate 028-3695, Japan
| | - Ryuji Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Morioka Red Cross Hospital, 6-1-1 Sanbonyanagi, Morioka, Iwate 020-8560, Japan
| | - Hisanori Ariga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate 028-3695, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Achard V, Abdel-Aty H, Santana VD, Bebek M, Kroese TE, Orazem M, Dirix P, Ost P, Lancia A. Combining Radiotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review from the Y-ECI ROSC EORTC group. Pract Radiat Oncol 2025:S1879-8500(25)00147-X. [PMID: 40412484 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2025] [Revised: 04/27/2025] [Accepted: 05/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/27/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with RT in the treatment of non-metastatic MIBC, focusing on neoadjuvant and bladder preservation strategies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review was conducted from January 2000 to December 2023 using PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. Studies investigating outcomes after combining immunotherapy with RT for non-metastatic MIBC were selected. Data extraction included study identifiers, patient characteristics, intervention and control arm details, and primary outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Among 28 selected studies, diverse approaches were observed, including neoadjuvant and bladder preservation strategies. Neoadjuvant trials, such as RACE IT, explored the feasibility of combining ICI with RT before radical cystectomy, showing promising efficacy and safety outcomes. In bladder preservation strategies, completed as well as ongoing trials demonstrated acceptable toxicity profiles and promising early efficacy data for combining ICI with chemoradiotherapy or RT alone. CONCLUSION Combining ICI with RT holds significant promise as a treatment strategy for non-metastatic MIBC. Preliminary evidence suggests favorable efficacy and safety profiles, supporting further exploration and potential integration into standard care. Ongoing phase III trials will provide crucial insights into the comparative effectiveness of adding ICI to conventional definitive treatments. In the evolving landscape of MIBC management, the combination of ICI and RT has the potential to reshape therapeutic paradigms and improve outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Hoda Abdel-Aty
- The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victor Duque Santana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Quironsalud Madrid University Hospital, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Tiuri E Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Miha Orazem
- Institute of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poon DM, Chiu PK, Chan MT, Ho BS, Law K, Leung AK, Leung CL, Na R, Wong KC, Wu PY, Kwong PW, Teoh JY. Consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology on the management of muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1564487. [PMID: 40406240 PMCID: PMC12095001 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1564487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Accepted: 04/10/2025] [Indexed: 05/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are notorious for their high propensity for recurrence and metastasis. Recent advances in novel medications, surgical procedures, and radiotherapy techniques have substantially transformed the treatment landscape of muscle-invasive and advanced UC. It is crucial to navigate the optimal management approaches for muscle-invasive and advanced UC through the increasingly complex matrix of variables. Methods Two professional organisations convened a consensus panel of six urologists and six clinical oncologists with extensive experience in treating urological malignancies. They reviewed the literature on the management of i) non-metastatic, muscle-invasive, and locally advanced UC of the bladder; ii) locally advanced upper tract UC (UTUC); and iii) unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC (mUC). The panel held multiple meetings to discuss and draft consensus statements using the modified Delphi method. Each drafted statement was anonymously voted on by every panellist. A consensus statement was accepted if ≥ 80% of the panellists chose 'accept completely' or 'accept with some reservation' from the five options, which also included 'accept with major reservation', 'reject with reservation', and 'reject completely'. Results The panel reached a consensus on 63 statements based on current evidence and expert insights. These statements addressed the considerations for different treatment modalities, including surgical approaches, radiotherapy, radiosensitisers, platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, in the management of different disease entities, including muscle-invasive UC of the bladder, cN1 disease, locally advanced UTUC, unresectable locally advanced/mUC, and oligometastatic bladder cancer. Conclusion These consensus statements are anticipated to serve as a practical recommendation for clinicians in Hong Kong, and possibly the Asia-Pacific region, regarding the management of muscle-invasive and advanced UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M.C. Poon
- Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter K.F. Chiu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Marco T.Y. Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Brian S.H. Ho
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - K.S. Law
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | | | - R. Na
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kenneth C.W. Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Philip Y. Wu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Philip W.K. Kwong
- Hong Kong Integrated Oncology Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jeremy Y.C. Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ozyigit G, Kahvecioglu A, Cengiz M, Yedekci FY, Hurmuz P. The effect of incidental dose to pelvic nodes in bladder-only irradiation in the era of IMRT: a dosimetric study. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:501-506. [PMID: 38888741 PMCID: PMC12014827 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02246-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE While three-dimensional radiotherapy (RT) causes high incidental nodal doses in bladder-only irradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the impact on pelvic lymphatics is unclear in the era of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). This study evaluates incidental doses to pelvic lymphatics in MIBC patients treated with IMRT. METHODS The data of 40 MIBC patients treated with bladder-only IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. The pelvic lymphatics were contoured on initial simulation images and incidental nodal doses were evaluated. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistics. RESULTS Median RT dose to the bladder was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In dosimetric analysis, median values of mean dose (Dmean) of the obturator, presacral, external iliac, internal iliac, and distal common iliac lymphatics were 33 Gy (range 4-50 Gy), 3 Gy (range 1-28 Gy), 9.5 Gy (range 3-41 Gy), 7.5 Gy (range 2-14 Gy), and 1 Gy (range 0-15 Gy), respectively. The Dmean of the obturator lymphatics was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and the Dmean of the distal common iliac lymphatics was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than all remaining lymphatic stations. The Dmean of the external iliac lymphatics was significantly higher than that of the presacral lymphatics (p < 0.001), but the difference with the internal iliac lymphatics was not statistically significant (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION The incidental nodal doses with bladder-only IMRT are heterogeneous and remain below the generally accepted doses for microscopic disease eradication for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokhan Ozyigit
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
- Oncology Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhiye-Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fazli Yagiz Yedekci
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van der Heijden AG, Bruins HM, Carrion A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Dimitropoulos K, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Kailavasan M, Lorch A, Martini A, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Mariappan P, Milowsky MI, Neuzillet Y, Panebianco V, Sæbjørnsen S, Smith EJ, Thalmann GN, Rink M. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2025 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2025; 87:582-600. [PMID: 40118736 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This publication represents a summary of the updated 2025 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC). The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of MMIBC with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS For the 2025 guidelines, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with MMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of MMIBC patients and the importance of shared decision-making with patients. The key changes in the 2025 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) guidelines include the following: a new recommendation for the use of susceptible FGFR3 alterations to select patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma for treatment with erdafitinib; significant adaption and update of the recommendations for pre- and postoperative radiotherapy and sexual organ-preserving techniques in women; new recommendation related to radical cystectomy and extent of lymph node dissection based on the results of the SWOG trial; recommendation related to hospital volume; new recommendations for salvage cystectomy after trimodality therapy and for the management of all patients who are candidates for trimodality bladder-preserving treatment in a multidisciplinary team setting using a shared decision-making process; significant adaption and update to the recommendation for adjuvant nivolumab in selected patients with pT3/4 and/or pN+ disease not eligible for, or who declined, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and addition of a new recommendation for metastatic disease regarding the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in case of HER2 overexpression; in addition, removal of the recommendations on sacituzumab govitecan as the manufacturer has withdrawn the US Food and Drug Administration approval for this product; update of the follow-up of MIBC; and full update of the management algorithms of MIBC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This overview of the 2025 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and follow-up of MIBC patients and is designed for effective integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Carrion
- Department of Urology, Vall Hebron Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Param Mariappan
- Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seven İ, Aktürk Esen S, Sekmek S, Karahan İ, Büyükaksoy M, Kökenek Ünal TD, Uncu D. Clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of urothelial carcinoma variant histologies and non-urothelial bladder cancers. Int Urol Nephrol 2025; 57:1451-1463. [PMID: 39729262 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04341-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Most bladder cancers are pure urothelial carcinomas, but a small portion, approximately 5-10%, have variant histology or are non-urothelial in nature. This research sought to examine the features of and treatment strategies for different types of urothelial carcinoma with variant histologies and non-urothelial bladder cancer. METHODS The study cohort comprised individuals with non-urothelial and variant urothelial bladder cancers treated at two medical centres in Ankara, Turkey, between 2005 and 2024. RESULTS A total of 104 individuals were reviewed, with 88 having urothelial cancer with variant histology and 16 having non-urothelial cancer. Non-urothelial cancers included neuroendocrine, undifferentiated, adenocarcinoma, squamous, sarcoma, and carcinosarcoma, with a median overall survival (OS) of 8 months. The most frequent urothelial carcinoma variants were squamous (43 cases), plasmacytoid (9 cases), and sarcomatoid (6 cases). Individuals with operable variants of urothelial malignancies had a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 16.5 months, while individuals with inoperable/metastatic variants experienced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.9 months. The median OS in the operable cohort was 18.5 months, compared to 10.8 months in the inoperable/metastatic group. CONCLUSION The present study reveals that variant urothelial and non-urothelial bladder cancers are aggressive in nature and have poor prognosis. Given the significant heterogeneity observed in OS, DFS, and PFS among these rare and diverse tumor subtypes, large-scale multicenter investigations are required to establish a consensus on patient handling and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İsmet Seven
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Selin Aktürk Esen
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serhat Sekmek
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İrfan Karahan
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Müge Büyükaksoy
- Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Doğan Uncu
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Popli S, Durant AM, Tyson M, Singh P. Current State of Bladder Preservation in High Grade Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2025:10.1007/s11912-025-01657-3. [PMID: 40304944 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, new, effective bladder sparing techniques have emerged as favorable options for patients with BCG-unresponsive high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), leading to a paradigm shift from the traditional radical cystectomy in clinical practice. Our aim is to examine the evolution of these techniques, summarize the current evidence, and shed light on the future of these treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS Bladder preservation techniques offer a patient-centered approach while also demonstrating non-inferiority to radical cystectomy in terms of survival outcomes for both NMIBC and MIBC patients. Approved novel therapies, including systemic pembrolizumab and intravesical agents such as nadofaragene, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept, and cretostimogene grenadenorepvec, have shown promising results for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients. For carefully selected MIBC patients, Trimodal Therapy (TMT) remains an effective alternative. However, the consensus on the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to TMT and the choice of radio-sensitizing chemotherapy / fractionation schedule of radiation therapy is still under investigation. Additionally, immunotherapy in BCG-naïve patients and as part of concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in MIBC patients offers favorable early results. Bladder preservation is a feasible and increasingly preferred alternative in certain NMIBC and MIBC patients who are either unfit or unwilling for radical cystectomy. Promising novel therapies, such as immunotherapy, recombinant intravesical therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates are emerging as potential alternatives. These therapies aim to achieve good oncological outcomes while maintaining quality of life, providing an alternative to the decades long standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Popli
- Mayo Clinic, (Medical Oncology), Phoenix, (Arizona), USA
| | | | - Mark Tyson
- Mayo Clinic, (Urology), Phoenix, (Arizona), USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, Choudhury A, Daneshmand S, Faltas BM, Flaig TW, Grass GD, Grivas P, Hansel DE, Hassanzadeh C, Kassouf W, Kukreja J, Mendoza-Valdés A, Moschini M, Mouw KW, Navai N, Necchi A, Rosenberg JE, Ross JS, Siefker-Radtke AO, Taylor J, Willliams SB, Zlotta AR, Buckley R, Kamat AM. Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00189-7. [PMID: 40268594 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patient-centric management necessitates providing care aligned with patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs. Therefore, critical assessment of bladder preservation therapies (BPTs) as alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and practical recommendations on the optimal selection of patients for BPTs are needed urgently. METHODS A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop BPT recommendations for MIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined based on discussions. Final recommendations achieved ≥75% agreement during the meeting, with further refinements through web conferences and e-mail discussions. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Patients with newly diagnosed MIBC should be offered evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting for consideration of BPTs. The main alternative to RC is trimodal therapy (TMT), and favorable prognostic factors for TMT include unifocal cT2 stage, lack of hydronephrosis, and no multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS). Other options should be reserved for very select patients who are ineligible for or who decline TMT or RC after thorough consideration of benefits versus risks. These include partial cystectomy (PC) for urachal adenocarcinoma and PC or radical transurethral resection alone for solitary tumors amenable to resection with adequate margins and without concomitant CIS or histologic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BPTs for MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bishoy M Faltas
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas W Flaig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - G Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Comron Hassanzadeh
- Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janet Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neema Navai
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCC San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Urology and Medicine (Oncology), Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Taylor
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stephen B Willliams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Heath Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roger Buckley
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mortaja M, Adams SR, McKay RR, Gutkind JS, Advani SJ. Spatially precise chemo-radio-immunotherapy by antibody drug conjugate directed tumor radiosensitization to potentiate immunotherapies. NPJ Precis Oncol 2025; 9:97. [PMID: 40181161 PMCID: PMC11968929 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-025-00885-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced cancer patients. While radiotherapy and immuno-oncology have advanced precision oncology, chemotherapies in the chemo-radiotherapy paradigm remain non-targeted cytotoxins. Antibody drug conjugates offer an opportunity for targeted radiosensitization that stimulates immune responses while protecting normal tissues. Here, we discuss the rationale for combining antibody drug conjugates, radiotherapy and immunotherapies and opportunities for clinical translation to advance towards targeted chemo-radio-immunotherapy precision cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Mortaja
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Stephen R Adams
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
- UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - J Silvio Gutkind
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
- UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Sunil J Advani
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
- UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ullén A, Aljabery F, Dahlman P, Falkman K, Gårdmark T, Jerlström T, Holst S, Kjellström S, Lind AK, Papantoniou D, Stenlund J, Ströck V, Söderkvist K, Thulin H, Trägårdh E, Verbiene I, Wallström J, Öfverholm E, Liedberg F. Swedish national guidelines on urothelial carcinoma: 2024 update on advanced and metastatic disease. Scand J Urol 2025; 60:76-82. [PMID: 40131172 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v60.43236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To overview and summarise the Swedish National Guidelines on Urothelial Carcinoma 2024. METHODS A narrative review of the updated guidelines was performed, highlighting new treatment recommendations for advanced and metastasized disease. Results: Compared to the previous guideline version, the current update includes recommendations for standardised radiological reporting when urothelial carcinomas are detected at CT-urography (CTU), to early identify locally advanced patients and accelerate the care pathway for these patients. The Swedish guidelines apply a more structured and liberal recommendation for the use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinomas compared to the EAU-guidelines and recommend such examinations prior to transurethral resection. Improved outcomes for radical cystectomy in Sweden after centralised cystectomy care have led to a recommendation for performing more than six nephroureterectomies (NUs) per year for upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC)-based associations with decreased use of invasive diagnostic modalities and better survival outcomes. Additionally, updated recommendations regarding adjuvant systemic therapies for muscle-invasive disease have been included. Whilst awaiting national regulatory approval for enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab, the present guideline version aligns with EAU-guidelines by endorsing cisplatin-gemcitabine-nivolumab as a new first-line treatment option in cisplatin-fit patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS The current version of the Swedish national guidelines on urothelial carcinoma introduces standardised reporting at CTU to facilitate early identification of advanced disease, includes recommendations for centralisation of NU for UTUC and updated recommendations for adjuvant systemic treatment of muscle-invasive disease and endorses cisplatin-gemcitabine-nivolumab as a new first-line treatment option for non-resectable locally advanced and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Ullén
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Firas Aljabery
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Pär Dahlman
- Department of Radiology, Uppsala Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Falkman
- Department of Urology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Truls Gårdmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Susanna Holst
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sofia Kjellström
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anna-Karin Lind
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | - Viveka Ströck
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Karin Söderkvist
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Onkology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Helena Thulin
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elin Trägårdh
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ingrida Verbiene
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jonas Wallström
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Krishnan A, Maitre P, Kashid S, Pansande N, Singh M, Singh P, Dubey S, Phurailatpam R, Patil D, Joshi A, Misra A, Arora A, Pal M, Prakash G, Murthy V. Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Bladder Preservation: Transitioning to Hypofractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025:S0360-3016(25)00246-9. [PMID: 40127844 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/08/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the clinical experience of bladder preservation with adaptive radiation therapy (ART) in conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (ConvRT) and discuss the challenges in transitioning to hypofractionated radiation therapy (HypoRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Consecutive patients from a prospectively maintained institutional database with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma, staged T1 to T4, N0 to N3, M0, treated with curative intent chemoradiation therapy from January 2014 to December 2023 were included. Patients from 2014 were treated with a dose of 64 Gy/32# to the bladder and 55 Gy/32# to the pelvis. From 2021 onward, most patients received 55 Gy/20# to the bladder and 44 Gy/20# to the pelvis. Suitable patients received neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy. All patients were treated with the "plan of the day" adaptive radiation therapy (POD-ART) technique. Acute (within 3 months of radiation therapy) and late urinary and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were assessed using the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Overall survival (OS), bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 221 patients treated with POD-ART were analyzed, 146 with ConvRT and 75 with HypoRT. Most treatment and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. In HypoRT, the gemcitabine dose was capped at 75 mg/m2. Acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity rates were similar between ConvRT and HypoRT cohorts. Acute grade 2 GI toxicity was higher in the HypoRT cohort (26.7%) compared with the ConvRT cohort (13.7%; P = .02). There were no ≥grade 3 acute GU or GI toxicity in the HypoRT cohort. On multivariable analysis, age >60 years and use of concurrent gemcitabine were statistically significant for acute ≥grade 2 GI toxicity. Late GU and GI toxicity rates at 15 months were similar in both cohorts. The 2-year OS, BCSS, DFS, and LC rates of patients in the ConvRT cohort were 85.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.6%-92.1%), 88.2% (95% CI, 82.3%-94.0%), 83.4% (95% CI, 76.7%-90.0%), and 89.0% (95% CI, 83.3%-94.6%), and HypoRT cohort was 85.3% (95% CI, 74.7%-95.8%), 90.2% (95% CI, 80.7%-99.6%), 80.4% (95% CI, 69.6%-91.1%), and 89.6% (95% CI, 81.3%-97.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION POD-ART allows safe treatment transition from ConvRT to HypoRT for bladder preservation. It mitigates some of the treatment-related toxicity during HypoRT, even with concurrent gemcitabine and pelvic radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuradha Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sheetal Kashid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Namrata Pansande
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Maneesh Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pallavi Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sakshi Dubey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Phurailatpam
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Divya Patil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ankit Misra
- Department of Medical Physics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amandeep Arora
- Department of Medical Physics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mahendra Pal
- Department of Medical Physics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gagan Prakash
- Department of Medical Physics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Geynisman DM, Abbosh PH, Ross E, Zibelman MR, Ghatalia P, Anari F, Mark JR, Stamatakis L, Hoffman-Censits JH, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Churilla TM, Horwitz EM, Hallman MA, Smaldone MC, Uzzo R, Chen DY, Kutikov A, Plimack ER. Phase II Trial of Risk-Enabled Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (RETAIN 1). J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:1113-1122. [PMID: 39680823 PMCID: PMC11908952 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Mutations in DNA damage repair genes are associated with pathologic downstaging after NAC. We hypothesized that a combination of biomarker selection and clinical staging would identify patients for cystectomy-sparing active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a single-arm, phase II, noninferiority trial to evaluate a risk-adapted approach for MIBC. Patients with cT2-T3N0M0 MIBC underwent NAC with accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (AMVAC). Pre-NAC transurethral bladder tumor specimens were sequenced for mutations in ATM, ERCC2, FANCC, and RB1. Patients with ≥1 mutation and cT0 post-NAC began AS. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 2 years for the entire cohort with the null hypothesis rejected if the lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI exceeds 64%. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 (47%) had a mutation, and 25 (36%) began per-protocol AS. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year MFS for all patients was 72.9% (lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI, 62.8). The 2-year MFS was 76.0% in the AS group (95% CI, 54.2 to 88.4) and 71.1% (95% CI, 55.5 to 82.1) in the remaining patients. In the AS group, 17 patients (68%) had some recurrence and 12 (48%) were metastasis-free with an intact bladder. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 84.3% (95% CI, 73.4 to 91.0); OS was 88.0% (95% CI, 67.3 to 96.0) and 82.2% (95% CI, 67.6 to 90.7) in the AS and not-AS groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with MIBC treated with AMVAC followed by a risk-adapted approach to local consolidation achieved a 2-year MFS rate of 73%. The primary end point was not met, but 17% of all enrolled patients and 48% of the AS group avoided cystectomy without metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Fern Anari
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James R. Mark
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Galarza Fortuna GM, Grass D, Maughan BL, Jain RK, Dechet C, Beck J, Schuetz E, Sanchez A, O'Neil B, Poch M, Li R, Lloyd S, Tward J, Phunrab T, Hawks JL, Swami U, Boucher KM, Agarwal N, Gupta S. Nivolumab adjuvant to chemo-radiation in localized muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: primary analysis of a multicenter, single-arm, phase II, investigator-initiated trial (NEXT). J Immunother Cancer 2025; 13:e010572. [PMID: 40102029 PMCID: PMC11927433 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (UC) has a high risk of recurrence after definitive treatment. Nivolumab adjuvant to radical surgery improves disease-free survival in patients with UC with a high risk of recurrence; however, its role adjuvant to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is unknown. METHODS The NEXT trial is a single-arm, phase-2 study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab adjuvant to CRT in patients with localized or locoregional UC. The primary endpoint is failure-free survival (FFS) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints include patterns of recurrence, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was subjected to shallow whole-genome sequencing to correlate with outcomes. RESULTS 28 patients were enrolled and received 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 12 cycles adjuvant to CRT. The FFS at 2 years was 33.2% (95% CI 18.5% to 59.6%). Nine (32%) patients had localized progression, and eight (29%) had distant progression. 25 (89%) had one or more high-risk features (ie, plasmacytoid differentiation, T4, N+, multiple tumors, tumors >5 cm, residual disease before CRT, carcinoma in situ, and hydronephrosis). Patients with ≤2 high-risk features had a median FFS of 45.2 months (95% CI 14.56 to not reached (NR)) compared with 8.2 months (95% CI 7.1 to NR) in those with three or more risk features (p=0.0024). Nivolumab-associated treatment-related adverse events occurred in 18 (64.3%) patients, only 3 had grade 3 TRAEs, with significant changes in QoL. Plasma cfDNA copy number instability (CNI) scores ≤25 before the first dose of adjuvant nivolumab and at cycle 4 were associated with better overall survival compared with CNI scores ≥26 (49.6 months vs 20.5 months, p=0.0024). Genome copy number changes indicated chromatin remodeling and tyrosine kinase pathways, among others, as oncogenic drivers implicated in progression. CONCLUSION Nivolumab adjuvant to CRT in localized or locally advanced UC is well tolerated. Stratification by risk factors and correlation with plasma cfDNA analyses generate hypotheses for potential patient selection and putative therapeutic targets for future study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03171025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Grass
- Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Benjamin L Maughan
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rohit K Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher Dechet
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Julia Beck
- Oncocyte Corporation, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Alejandro Sanchez
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael Poch
- Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center Inc, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jonathan Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tenzin Phunrab
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Josiah Lyn Hawks
- Research Compliance Office, University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Department of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kenneth M Boucher
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sumati Gupta
- University of Utah Health Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Longoni M, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Marmiroli A, Falkenbach F, Le QC, Nicolazzini M, Catanzaro C, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Puliatti S, De Cobelli O, Graefen M, Chun FKH, Palumbo C, Schiavina R, Saad F, Shariat SF, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Survival Outcomes and Temporal Trends of Non-Surgical Management Vs Radical Cystectomy in Non-Organ-Confined Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Urology 2025:S0090-4295(25)00216-X. [PMID: 40057122 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2025] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether bimodal therapy (BMT) or trimodal therapy (TMT) differ from radical cystectomy (RC) + perioperative chemotherapy (CT) in cancer control outcomes among patients with non-organ-confined (NOC; T3-4 and/or N1-3) urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB). METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2005-2021), rates of BMT vs TMT vs RC + CT use in NOC UCUB patients were tabulated. Nearest-neighbor 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, stage, and race/ethnicity was applied. Cumulative incidence plots depicted 5-year cancer-specific (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) rates. Univariable and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Sensitivity analyses focused within T3-4,N0 patients. RESULTS Of 7401 NOC UCUB patients, 1645 (22.2%) received BMT vs 884 (11.9%) TMT vs 4872 (65.8%) RC+CT. Over the study period, BMT and TMT rates have not significantly changed. After PSM, the five-year CSM rate was 66.2% after BMT vs 44.9% after RC + CT and BMT was associated with 2.1-fold higher CSM relative to RC + CT (multivariable HR [mHR]: 2.12, P <.001). After PSM, 5-year CSM rates was 61.1% after TMT vs 46.6% after RC and TMT was associated with 1.6-fold higher CSM relative to RC (mHR: 1.63, P <.001). Virtually the same findings were found within T3-4,N0 patients. CONCLUSION Approximately three out of ten NOC UCUB patients were treated with either BMT or TMT. However, such practice was invariably associated with higher CSM relative to RC + CT. These observations should be discussed at clinical decision-making and prior to informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Longoni
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Quynh Chi Le
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michele Nicolazzini
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Calogero Catanzaro
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Morris ZS, Demaria S, Monjazeb AM, Formenti SC, Weichselbaum RR, Welsh J, Enderling H, Schoenfeld JD, Brody JD, McGee HM, Mondini M, Kent MS, Young KH, Galluzzi L, Karam SD, Theelen WSME, Chang JY, Huynh MA, Daib A, Pitroda S, Chung C, Serre R, Grassberger C, Deng J, Sodji QH, Nguyen AT, Patel RB, Krebs S, Kalbasi A, Kerr C, Vanpouille-Box C, Vick L, Aguilera TA, Ong IM, Herrera F, Menon H, Smart D, Ahmed J, Gartrell RD, Roland CL, Fekrmandi F, Chakraborty B, Bent EH, Berg TJ, Hutson A, Khleif S, Sikora AG, Fong L. Proceedings of the National Cancer Institute Workshop on combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy: challenges and opportunities for clinical translation. Lancet Oncol 2025; 26:e152-e170. [PMID: 40049206 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00656-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2025]
Abstract
Radiotherapy both promotes and antagonises tumour immune recognition. Some clinical studies show improved patient outcomes when immunotherapies are integrated with radiotherapy. Safe, greater than additive, clinical response to the combination is limited to a subset of patients, however, and how radiotherapy can best be combined with immunotherapies remains unclear. The National Cancer Institute-Immuno-Oncology Translational Network-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer-American Association of Immunology Workshop on Combining Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy was convened to identify and prioritise opportunities and challenges for radiotherapy and immunotherapy combinations. Sessions examined the immune effects of radiation, barriers to anti-tumour immune response, previous clinical trial data, immunological and computational assessment of response, and next-generation radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations. Panel recommendations included: developing and implementing patient selection and biomarker-guided approaches; applying mechanistic understanding to optimise delivery of radiotherapy and selection of immunotherapies; using rigorous preclinical models including companion animal studies; embracing data sharing and standardisation, advanced modelling, and multidisciplinary cross-institution collaboration; interrogating clinical data, including negative trials; and incorporating novel clinical endpoints and trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arta M Monjazeb
- UC Davis Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Silvia C Formenti
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James Welsh
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heiko Enderling
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Brody
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heather M McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Immuno-Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michele Mondini
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Villejuif, France
| | - Michael S Kent
- Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Cancer Signaling and Microenvironment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mai Anh Huynh
- Brigham and Women's Hospital-Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adi Daib
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Pitroda
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raphael Serre
- Aix Marseille University, SMARTc Unit, Inserm S 911 CRO2, Marseille, France
| | | | - Jie Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Quaovi H Sodji
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Anthony T Nguyen
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ravi B Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Simone Krebs
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anusha Kalbasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Caroline Kerr
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Logan Vick
- Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Irene M Ong
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Fernanda Herrera
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hari Menon
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - DeeDee Smart
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jalal Ahmed
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robyn D Gartrell
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Oncology, Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fatemeh Fekrmandi
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Binita Chakraborty
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric H Bent
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tracy J Berg
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alan Hutson
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Samir Khleif
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew G Sikora
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Glaviano A, Singh SK, Lee EHC, Okina E, Lam HY, Carbone D, Reddy EP, O'Connor MJ, Koff A, Singh G, Stebbing J, Sethi G, Crasta KC, Diana P, Keyomarsi K, Yaffe MB, Wander SA, Bardia A, Kumar AP. Cell cycle dysregulation in cancer. Pharmacol Rev 2025; 77:100030. [PMID: 40148026 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmr.2024.100030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a systemic manifestation of aberrant cell cycle activity and dysregulated cell growth. Genetic mutations can determine tumor onset by either augmenting cell division rates or restraining normal controls such as cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. As a result, tumor cells not only undergo uncontrolled cell division but also become compromised in their ability to exit the cell cycle accurately. Regulation of cell cycle progression is enabled by specific surveillance mechanisms known as cell cycle checkpoints, and aberrations in these signaling pathways often culminate in cancer. For instance, DNA damage checkpoints, which preclude the generation and augmentation of DNA damage in the G1, S, and G2 cell cycle phases, are often defective in cancer cells, allowing cell division in spite of the accumulation of genetic errors. Notably, tumors have evolved to become dependent on checkpoints for their survival. For example, checkpoint pathways such as the DNA replication stress checkpoint and the mitotic checkpoint rarely undergo mutations and remain intact because any aberrant activity could result in irreparable damage or catastrophic chromosomal missegregation leading to cell death. In this review, we initially focus on cell cycle control pathways and specific functions of checkpoint signaling involved in normal and cancer cells and then proceed to examine how cell cycle control and checkpoint mechanisms can provide new therapeutic windows that can be exploited for cancer therapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: DNA damage checkpoints are often defective in cancer cells, allowing cell division in spite of the accumulation of genetic errors. Conversely, DNA replication stress and mitotic checkpoints rarely undergo mutations because any aberrant activity could result in irreparable damage or catastrophic chromosomal missegregation, leading to cancer cell death. This review focuses on the checkpoint signaling mechanisms involved in cancer cells and how an emerging understanding of these pathways can provide new therapeutic opportunities for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Glaviano
- Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Samarendra K Singh
- School of Biotechnology, Institute of Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - E Hui Clarissa Lee
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elena Okina
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hiu Yan Lam
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Daniela Carbone
- Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - E Premkumar Reddy
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Mark J O'Connor
- Discovery Centre, AstraZeneca, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0AA, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Koff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York
| | - Garima Singh
- School of Biotechnology, Institute of Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Justin Stebbing
- School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Gautam Sethi
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Healthy Longevity Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Karen Carmelina Crasta
- NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Healthy Longevity Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Healthy Longevity, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrizia Diana
- Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Khandan Keyomarsi
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael B Yaffe
- MIT Center for Precision Cancer Medicine, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seth A Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan Prem Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Center for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xu C, Dong Y, Pei D, Zhang X, Han X, Cao C, Wu B, Lv C, Kang Z, Zhou L, Liu Y, Yao L. Innovative logic "AND" gate gene circuits for bladder cancer treatment: preclinical study. Int J Surg 2025; 111:2735-2751. [PMID: 39903549 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
In the evolving field of precision oncology, the synthesis of gene circuits that specifically target cancer cells while preserving normal tissue marks a significant breakthrough. However, traditional approaches typically concentrate on single-gene targets, lacking the directed recognition and control among the intricate networks of signaling pathways. Our study presents a synthetic gene circuit, the Logic "AND" Gate Dual-Target Genetic Circuit (LAG-DTGC), which integrates multiple signals to achieve comprehensive reprogramming of various signaling pathways in bladder cancer (BC) cells. This circuit's development hinged on detailed bioinformatics analysis, pinpointing more unique biomarkers with similar expression pattern in BC. LAG-DTGC is engineered to selectively activate in cells where these biomarkers are abnormally expressed. Its precision and the remodeling cell behavior capability are further enhanced by incorporating a logic "AND" gate, triggering the circuit only in the presence of these aberrant cancer-specific biomarkers. LAG-DTGC exhibits an extraordinary ability to reprogram cancer cell signaling pathways, turning the cells' own mechanisms against them for therapeutic effect. This work highlights the potential of synthetic biology in developing precise, less toxic treatments for BC. The LAG-DTGC represents a promising new paradigm in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaojie Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Dong
- Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Dongchen Pei
- Department of Urology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Xintao Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiaohong Han
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Congcong Cao
- Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Baorui Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Changning Lv
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengjun Kang
- Department of Urology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuchen Liu
- Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lin Yao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Garcia-Del-Muro X, P Valderrama B, Medina-Colmenero A, Etxaniz O, Gironés Sarrió R, Juan-Fita MJ, Costa-García M, Moreno R, Miras Rodríguez I, Ortiz I, Cuéllar A, Ferrer F, Vigués F, de Haro Piedra R, Candal Gomez A, Villà S, Pontones JL, Murria Y, Lendínez-Cano G, Alemany R. Bladder Preservation with Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (IMMUNOPRESERVE): A Phase II Spanish Oncology GenitoUrinary Group Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2025; 31:659-666. [PMID: 39957401 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Revised: 10/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of radiation and immunotherapy potentiated antitumor activity in preclinical models. The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a bladder-preserving approach, including dual immune checkpoint blockade and radiotherapy, in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with localized MIBC underwent transurethral resection, followed by durvalumab (1,500 mg) plus tremelimumab (75 mg) every 4 weeks for three doses and concurrent radiotherapy (64-66 Gy to bladder). Patients with residual or relapsed MIBC underwent salvage cystectomy. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as the absence of MIBC at posttreatment biopsy. Secondary endpoints were bladder-intact disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were enrolled at six centers. Complete response was documented in 26 (81%) patients. Two patients had residual MIBC, and four patients were not evaluated. After a median follow-up of 27 months, 2 patients underwent salvage cystectomy. The 2-year rates for bladder-intact disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 65%, 83%, and 84%, respectively. The 2-year estimates of non-muscle-invasive bladder relapse, MIBC, and distant metastasis were 3%, 19%, and 16%, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were reported in 31% of patients, with diarrhea (6%) and acute kidney failure (6%) being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS This multimodal approach including durvalumab plus tremelimumab with concurrent radiotherapy is feasible and safe, showing high efficacy in terms of response and eliciting bladder preservation in a large number of patients. Further research on this approach as an alternative to cystectomy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Garcia-Del-Muro
- Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Olatz Etxaniz
- Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | - Marcel Costa-García
- Cancer Immunotherapy Group, Oncobell and iProCURE Programs, IDIBELL-Institut Català d'Oncologia, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Moreno
- Cancer Immunotherapy Group, Oncobell and iProCURE Programs, IDIBELL-Institut Català d'Oncologia, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Irene Ortiz
- Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Cuéllar
- Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Ferrer
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Vigués
- Urology Service, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Arturo Candal Gomez
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Fundación Centro Oncológico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Salvador Villà
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Pontones
- Oncology Urology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Yasmina Murria
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Ramon Alemany
- Cancer Immunotherapy Group, Oncobell and iProCURE Programs, IDIBELL-Institut Català d'Oncologia, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bola B, Hoskin PJ, Sangar V, Choudhury A. The Promise of Radiotherapy in High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:628. [PMID: 40002223 PMCID: PMC11853320 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2024] [Revised: 02/03/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Global shortages, toxicities, and high levels of incomplete treatment with Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer has resulted in increasing interest in alternative treatments. Radiotherapy is not the standard of care for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), despite being routinely used in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Modern techniques and advances in technology mean that radiotherapy can be delivered with increased precision in reducing normal tissue damage. Developing novel biomarker approaches, together with combination approaches with radiosensitisers and other systemic treatments, means that radiotherapy could offer greater benefits than current treatments with BCG or surgery. This review summarises the current landscape and future potential of radiotherapy for high-risk NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky Bola
- Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Trust, Whiston Hospital, Warrington Road, Prescot L35 5DR, UK
- The Genito Urinary Cancer Group, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Peter J. Hoskin
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
- The Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Vijay Sangar
- The Genito Urinary Cancer Group, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Manchester Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, The Oglesby Cancer Research Building, The University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK
- The Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Avolio PP, Kool R, Shayegan B, Marcq G, Black PC, Breau RH, Kim M, Busca I, Abdi H, Dawidek M, Uy M, Fervaha G, Cury FL, Sanchez-Salas R, Alimohamed N, Izawa J, Jeldres C, Rendon R, Siemens R, Kulkarni GS, Kassouf W. Effect of Complete Transurethral Resection on Oncologic Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:317-324. [PMID: 39186955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing complete versus incomplete transurethral tumor resection (TURBT) before radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent curative-intent radiation therapy between 2002 and 2018 at 10 Canadian institutions were retrospectively evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed using baseline characteristics. Differences in survival outcomes by complete and incomplete TURBT were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 757 patients included, 66% (498) had documentation of a complete and 34% (259) an incomplete TURBT. Before adjustment, 121 (47%) and 45 (9%) patients who underwent incomplete and complete TURBT, respectively, were diagnosed with cT3-4 tumor (P <.001). After weight-adjustment, all baseline cohort characteristics were balanced (absolute standardized differences < 0.1). The adjusted median follow-up was 27 months. Adjusted survival analyses showed no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (48% vs 52%, 1.03 [0.82-1.29]; P = .8), cancer-specific survival (64% vs 61%, 0.93 [0.70-1.25]; P = .7), metastasis-free survival (43% vs 46%, 0.97 [0.79-1.19]; P = .8), and disease-free survival (32% vs 35%, 0.95 [0.79-1.15]; P = .7) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Complete TURBT may be associated with clinical organ-confined disease. Extent of TURBT was not independently associated with oncologic outcomes in patients with MIBC treated with radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Paolo Avolio
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ronald Kool
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Abdominal Surgery, Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner - Cancer Center, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Kim
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ionut Busca
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hamidreza Abdi
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Dawidek
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Uy
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gagan Fervaha
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jonathan Izawa
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Jeldres
- Division of Urology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Division of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kotha NV, Kumar A, Riviere P, Nelson TJ, Qiao EM, Salmasi A, McKay RR, Efstathiou JA, Rose BS, Stewart TF. Patterns of Failure After Definitive Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2025; 23:102229. [PMID: 39709685 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world outcomes, especially patterns of failure, are limited for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with trimodality therapy (TMT). We aim to evaluate patterns of failure after TMT for MIBC in a typical heterogeneous population. METHODS In the national Veterans Affairs database, patients with urothelial histology, MIBC (T2-4a/N0-3/M0) who underwent definitive intent TMT between 2000-2018. Successful TMT was defined as ≥ 50% definitive radiation dose and ≥ 1 cycle chemotherapy. Endpoints of any recurrence, metastatic (nonbladder) recurrence (MR), and local (bladder) recurrence (LR) evaluated in multivariable Fine-Gray models. Times to recurrence calculated from radiation start date. RESULTS In 347 patients with MIBC treated with TMT, 65% of patients were deemed ineligible for surgery while 35% were surgically eligible but elected for TMT. Median follow-up time was 77 months. Median overall survival was 32.4 months (95% CI: 28.2-36.7). 154 (44%) patients had no recurrence. 130 (37%) patients developed MR, median time 9.9 months. 117 (34%) patients developed LR, median time 8.7 months. In multivariable models, lymph node positive (LN+) disease (HR:3.31, 95% CI: 1.45-7.55, P < .01) and pretreatment hydronephrosis (HR:1.62, 95% CI:1.11-2.36, P = .01) were associated with higher rates of MR. No patient, tumor, or treatment variables were associated with LR. CONCLUSIONS Across a multi-institutional and heterogeneous population, TMT is an effective treatment for many real-world patients with MIBC. However, a notable proportion of patients develop MR and/or LR which emphasizes the need for post-treatment surveillance and improved treatment pathways. Identified high risk features (LN+ disease, pretreatment hydronephrosis) and other markers should be further investigated to delineate the patients at high risk of TMT failure who therefore may potentially benefit from augmented treatment, such as additional systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V Kotha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University. Palo Alto, CA; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University. Durham, NC
| | - Paul Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA
| | - Edmund M Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA
| | - Amirali Salmasi
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Boston, MA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. San Diego, CA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego. La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Srisajjakul S, Prapaisilp P, Bangchokdee S. VI steps to achieve VI-RADS assessment. Eur J Radiol 2025; 183:111868. [PMID: 39719733 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/26/2024]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is categorized into nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), distinguished by the presence of detrusor muscle invasion. Urothelial cell carcinoma is the most common subtype of bladder cancer. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the standard approach for staging and managing NMIBC, while radical cystectomy remains the cornerstone treatment for MIBC. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), comprising morphological imaging sequences (high-resolution T2-weighted images) and functional imaging sequences (dynamic contrast-enhanced images and diffusion-weighted images), serves as an ideal modality. It provides high-contrast resolution for visualizing bladder wall layers, thereby enabling proper and timely staging of bladder cancer. MRI can guide sampling resection and identify patients understaged after primary TURBT, facilitating appropriate surgical restaging. In 2018, the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS), implementing a 5-point scale, was developed to standardize MRI protocols and reporting criteria-including tumor location, size, morphology, and invasiveness. The aim of this article is to navigate through all the steps to achieve VI-RADS assessment and to discuss practical pearls and pitfalls in the use of mpMRI. This approach can aid in pre-TURBT prediction of muscle invasion, representing an important asset in bladder cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitthipong Srisajjakul
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang road Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
| | - Patcharin Prapaisilp
- Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang road Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Sirikan Bangchokdee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pathum Thani Hospital, 7 Ladlumkaew Muang district, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Davies‐Teye BB, Siddiqui MM, Zhang X, Johnson A, Burcu M, Onukwugha E, Hanna N. Treatment Patterns and Radical Cystectomy Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed With Urothelial Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in the United States. Cancer Med 2025; 14:e70644. [PMID: 39945337 PMCID: PMC11822655 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize trends and patterns in treatment characteristics and perioperative outcomes of patients with urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We utilized the National Cancer Database to assess trends and patterns in treatment modalities (radical cystectomy [RC] with or without neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments, trimodal bladder-sparing treatment [trimodal treatment], and others) among MIBC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. We also assessed trends and patterns of short-term post-surgery outcomes, including 30-day and 90-day mortality, and readmissions. RESULTS Among 83,259 MIBC patients, those who received RC, trimodal treatment, and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) plus chemotherapy were 34,715 (41.7%), 7,372 (8.9%), and 6,171 (7.4%), respectively. A substantial proportion (29,314; 35.2%) of MIBC patients received other treatments, including TURBT-only. From 2004 through 2017, the proportion of MIBC patients who utilized guideline-recommended treatments, whether RC (from 36.4% to 42.8%) or trimodal treatment (from 7.9% to 10.2%), increased. Among those who received RC, there was a substantial increase in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilization, from 7.8% to 29.4%. Conversely, utilization of RC without perioperative treatments decreased from 62.3% to 32.7%. There was a significant decrease in 30-day (2.8%-1.8%) and 90-day (7.1%-5.3%) mortality rates among RC recipients. CONCLUSION There was a shift in treatment modalities for MIBC, with increased utilization of RC with NAC. A decrease in post-surgery mortality rates may indicate improved outcomes, although the unmet need for NAC utilization requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Bright Davies‐Teye
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes ResearchUniversity of Maryland School of PharmacyBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | | | - Abree Johnson
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes ResearchUniversity of Maryland School of PharmacyBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | - Eberechukwu Onukwugha
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes ResearchUniversity of Maryland School of PharmacyBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Nader Hanna
- University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marcq G, Kool R, Dragomir A, Kulkarni GS, Breau RH, Kim M, Busca I, Abdi H, Dawidek M, Uy M, Fervaha G, Alimohamed N, Izawa J, Jeldres C, Rendon R, Shayegan B, Siemens R, Black PC, Cury FL, Kassouf W. Benefit of Whole-Pelvis Radiation for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:308-317. [PMID: 39361935 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The value of pelvic lymph node irradiation is debated for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing curative-intent radiation therapy (RT). We sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between bladder-only (BO)-RT and whole-pelvis (WP)-RT using a large Canadian multicenter collaborative database. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study cohort consisted of 809 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent curative RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the RT volume: WP-RT versus BO-RT. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were used to balance covariates across treatment groups. Regression models were used to assess the effect of the RT volume on the rates of complete response (CR), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS After exclusion criteria, 599 patients were included, of whom 369 (61.6%) underwent WP-RT. Patients receiving WP-RT were younger (ASD, 0.41) and more likely to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (ASD, 0.21), clinical node-positive disease (ASD, 0.40), and lymphovascular invasion (ASD, 0.25). In addition, WP-RT patients were more commonly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ASD, 0.29) and concurrent chemotherapy (ASD, 0.44). In the IPTW cohort, BO-RT and WP-RT groups were well balanced (all pretreatment parameters with an ASD <0.10). In multivariable analysis, WP-RT was not associated with CR rates post-RT (odds ratio, 1.14 [95 CI, 0.76 to 1.72]; P = .526) but was associated with both CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93]; P = .016) and OS (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.87]; P = .002), independent of other prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that WP radiation was associated with better survival compared with bladder radiation alone after adjusted analysis. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, CANTHER-Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Ronald Kool
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Erasto Gaertner Cancer Center, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Alice Dragomir
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ionut Busca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hamidreza Abdi
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Mark Dawidek
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michael Uy
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gagan Fervaha
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Claudio Jeldres
- Division of Urology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Coen JJ, Rodgers JP, Saylor PJ, Lee CT, Wu CL, Parker W, Lautenschlaeger T, Zietman AL, Efstathiou J, Jani AB, Kucuk O, Souhami L, Pugh SL, Sandler HM, Shipley WU. Long-Term Results of Bladder Preservation With Twice-Daily Radiation Plus 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin or Daily Radiation Plus Gemcitabine for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer-Updated Report of NRG/RTOG 0712: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:153-161. [PMID: 39147209 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE For bladder-sparing treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin with twice-daily radiation (FCT) or gemcitabine plus daily radiation (GD) are effective chemoradiation (CRT) regimens. This trial evaluated these regimens and demonstrated efficacy with either regimen at 3 years. With further follow-up, longer-term results are reported here. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with cT2 to cT4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer were randomized to FCT or GD. Patients had a transurethral resection and induction CRT to 40 Gy. Patients with a complete response received consolidation CRT to 64 Gy. Others had cystectomy. Adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy was administered. The primary endpoint was freedom from distant metastasis (FDM). This updated analysis reports 7-year data. Toxicity and efficacy endpoints, including bladder-intact distant metastasis-free survival (BI-DMFS) were also assessed. RESULTS From December 2008 to April 2014, 70 patients were enrolled; 66 were eligible for analysis, 33 per arm. Median follow-up was 9.1 years for eligible living patients. At 7 years, FDM was 65% and 73% for FCT and GD, respectively. Bladder-intact distant metastasis-free survival was 58% (95% CI, 41-76) and 68% (95% CI, 51-84), respectively. The post hoc hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.37-1.55) showed no difference between treatments (P = .44). Overall survival at 7 years was 48% and 59%. There were 4 and 5 cystectomies performed for FCT and GD, respectively. In the FCT arm, there were 5 (16%), 1 (3%), and 0 grade 3, 4, and 5 late toxicities reported, respectively. In the GD arm, there were 7 (23%), 0, and 0 grade 3, 4, and 5 late toxicities reported, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both regimens maintained high FDM rates at 7 years. Cystectomy rates were low and overall survival rates were high on both arms. Late toxicity rates were low. Either gemcitabine and daily radiation or a cisplatin-based regimen are effective bladder-sparing therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Coen
- Roger Williams Radiation Oncology, Providence, Rhode Island.
| | - Joseph P Rodgers
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center - American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Cheryl T Lee
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Parker
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Luis Souhami
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center - American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hafeez S, Warren-Oseni K, Jones K, Mohammed K, El-Ghzal A, Dearnaley D, Harris V, Khan A, Kumar P, Lalondrelle S, McDonald F, Tan M, Thomas K, Thompson A, McNair HA, Hansen VN, Huddart RA. Bladder Tumor-Focused Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Clinical Outcomes of a Phase I Dose Escalation Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:165-175. [PMID: 39069239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We determine the maximum tolerated tumor-focused dose (MTD) for the radical treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer enabled by image guided adaptive radiation therapy and long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-nine patients with T2 to T4aN0M0 unifocal urothelial muscle invasive bladder cancer suitable for daily radical radiation therapy were recruited prospectively to an ethics-approved protocol (NCT01124682). The uninvolved bladder (PTVbladder) was planned to 52 Gy in 32 fractions. The bladder tumor (PTVtumor) was planned to an assigned dose level of 68, 70, 72, or 74 Gy. If organ at risk dose constraints were violated, then PTVtumor was planned to 64 Gy. Dose level allocation was determined by concurrent toxicity assessment of all previous patients recruited. Acute toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0; late toxicity was evaluated using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The MTD was predefined as the highest dose level with an estimated probability of ≤ 15% ≥ G3 late toxicity and an observed rate of <50% acute G3 and <10% acute G4 toxicity. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were assigned to 68 Gy, of whom 6 were planned to 64 Gy; 29 patients were assigned to 70 Gy of whom 1 was planned to 68 Gy, 2 patients were assigned and planned to 72 Gy; no patients were assigned to 74 Gy. Three patients did not complete the treatment as planned, of whom only 1 patient stopped treatment because dose-limiting toxicity occurred. The MTD was 70 Gy. Acute genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal G3 acute toxicity was seen in 19% and 7% of patients, respectively. No acute G4 genito-urinary or gastro-intestinal toxicity was seen. Late toxicity (any) G3 and G4 was seen in 14% and 2% of patients, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 58% (95% CI, 44%-71%). The bladder preservation rate was 89% (95% CI, 88%-96%) with 6 patients not retaining native bladder function. CONCLUSIONS Bladder tumor-focused dose escalation to 70 Gy using image guided adaptive radiation therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. This dose level has been evaluated in a phase II randomized control trial (RAIDER NCT02447549).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaista Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Karole Warren-Oseni
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kelly Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kabir Mohammed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amir El-Ghzal
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Dearnaley
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Harris
- Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Atia Khan
- North Middlesex University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pardeep Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Lalondrelle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona McDonald
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Tan
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Thomas
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen A McNair
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vibeke N Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Robert A Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pfail J, Lichtbroun B, Golombos DM, Jang TL, Packiam VT, Ghodoussipour S. The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement. Curr Opin Urol 2025; 35:115-122. [PMID: 39350629 PMCID: PMC11617270 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The role of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with clinically positive lymph nodes is debated. This review examines the role of surgery in treating patients with clinical N1 and more advanced nodal involvement (N2-N3) within a multimodal treatment approach. RECENT FINDINGS For clinical N1 disease, guidelines typically recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, for N2-N3 disease, guidelines vary. Advances in diagnostics, systemic therapies, and surgical recovery have improved the prognosis for these patients. Research is increasingly identifying MIBC patients, including those with positive nodes, who may achieve complete pathologic response and long-term survival, supporting the role of surgery even in advanced nodal stages. SUMMARY Managing MIBC with clinically positive lymph nodes, especially in N2-N3 disease, requires a tailored approach. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is standard for N1 disease, the role of surgery in advanced nodal stages is growing because of better patient selection and treatment strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that consolidative surgery may improve outcomes in these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Pfail
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin Lichtbroun
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - David M. Golombos
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas L. Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vignesh T. Packiam
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Huddart R, Hafeez S, Griffin C, Choudhury A, Foroudi F, Syndikus I, Hindson B, Webster A, McNair H, Birtle A, Varughese M, Henry A, McLaren DB, Parikh O, Nikapota A, Tang C, Patel E, Miles E, Warren-Oseni K, Kron T, Hill C, Philipps L, Vassallo-Bonner C, Cheung KC, Gribble H, Lewis R, Hall E. Dose-escalated Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer: Results of the Phase 2 RAIDER Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2025; 87:60-70. [PMID: 39379236 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Delivering radiotherapy to the bladder is challenging as it is a mobile, deformable structure. Dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiotherapy could improve outcomes. RAIDER aimed to demonstrate the safety of such a schedule. METHODS RAIDER is an international phase 2 noncomparative randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN26779187). Patients with unifocal T2-T4a urothelial bladder cancer were randomised (1:1:2) to standard whole bladder radiotherapy (WBRT), standard-dose adaptive radiotherapy (SART), or dose-escalated adaptive radiotherapy (DART). Two fractionation (f) schedules recruited independently. WBRT and SART dose was 55 Gy/20f or 64 Gy/32f, and DART dose was 60 Gy/20f or 70 Gy/32f. For SART and DART, a radiotherapy plan (small, medium, or large) was chosen daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with radiotherapy-related late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 toxicity; the trial was designed to rule out >20% toxicity with DART. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 345 patients were randomised between October 2015 and April 2020: 41/46 WBRT, 41/46 SART, and 81/90 DART patients in the 20f/32f cohorts, respectively. The median age was 72/73 yr; 78%/85% had T2 tumours, 46%/52% had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 70%/71% had radiosensitising therapy. The median follow-up was 42.1/38.2 mo. Sixty-six of 77 (86%) 20f and 74 of 82 (90%) 32f participants planned for DART met the mandatory medium plan dose constraints. Radiotherapy-related grade ≥3 toxicity was reported in one of 58 patients (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.1, 7.9) with 20f DART and zero of 56 patients with 32f DART. Two-year overall survival was 77% (95% CI 69, 82) for WBRT + SART and 80% (95% CI 73, 85) for DART (hazard ratio = 0.84, 95% CI 0.59, 1.21, p = 0.4). Thirteen of 345 (3.8%) participants had salvage cystectomy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Grade ≥3 late toxicity was low. DART was safe and feasible to deliver, meeting preset toxicity thresholds. Disease-related outcomes are promising for dose-escalated treatments, with a low salvage cystectomy rate and overall survival similar to that seen in cystectomy cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Hindson
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Amanda Webster
- University College Hospital, London, UK; University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Helen McNair
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Alison Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Mohini Varughese
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Ann Henry
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Omi Parikh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - Ashok Nikapota
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Colin Tang
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Emma Patel
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Karole Warren-Oseni
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Tomas Kron
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sargos P, Xylinas E, Khalifa J. From a Storm to Sunshine: The Future of Bladder-sparing Therapy is Bright. Eur Urol 2025; 87:71-72. [PMID: 39379235 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oncopole Claudius Rigaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kool R, Dragomir A, Kulkarni GS, Marcq G, Breau RH, Kim M, Busca I, Abdi H, Dawidek M, Uy M, Fervaha G, Cury FL, Alimohamed N, Izawa J, Jeldres C, Rendon R, Shayegan B, Siemens R, Black PC, Kassouf W. Benefit of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy in a Real-world Setting: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighted Analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1350-1357. [PMID: 38326142 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves survival for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy. Studies on the potential benefit of NAC before radiation-based therapy (RT) are conflicting. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of NAC on patients with MIBC treated with curative-intent RT in a real-world setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study cohort consisted of 785 patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0-2M0) who underwent RT at academic centers across Canada. Patients were classified into two treatment groups based on the administration of NAC before RT (NAC vs no NAC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with absolute standardized differences (ASDs) was used to balance covariates across treatment groups. The impact of NAC on complete response, overall, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RT in the weighted cohort was analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After applying the exclusion criteria, 586 patients were included; 102 (17%) received NAC before RT. Patients in the NAC subgroup were younger (mean age 65 vs 77 yr; ASD 1.20); more likely to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (87% vs 78%; ASD 0.28), lymphovascular invasion (32% vs 20%; ASD 0.27), higher cT stage (cT3-4 in 29% vs 20%; ASD 0.21), and higher cN stage (cN1-2 in 32% vs 4%; ASD 0.81); and more commonly treated with concurrent chemotherapy (79% vs 67%; ASD 0.28). After IPTW, NAC versus no NAC cohorts were well balanced (ASD <0.20) for all included covariates. NAC was significantly associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005). This study was limited by potential occult imbalances across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS If tolerated, NAC might be associated with improved survival and should be considered for eligible patients with MIBC planning to undergo bladder preservation with RT. Prospective trials are warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be associated with improved survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who elect for curative-intent radiation-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Kool
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Abdominal Surgery, Division of Urologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner-Cancer Center, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Alice Dragomir
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France; CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ionut Busca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hamidreza Abdi
- Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Dawidek
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Uy
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gagan Fervaha
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jonathan Izawa
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Jeldres
- Division of Urology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Ricardo Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brassart C, Coutte A, Wallet J, Meyer E, Benyoucef A, Mnif H, Kowalski V, Barthoulot M, Pasquier D. Oncological outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with trimodal strategy: A French multicentric study. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:657-666. [PMID: 39578137 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trimodal therapy, an organ-sparing alternative, may be proposed for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer instead of radical cystectomy. In this multicentre retrospective study, we aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of patients who had trimodal therapy for a muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-three patients from four centres treated who had trimodal therapy (maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumour and concomitant chemoradiotherapy) for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer were included. Patients meeting the optimal trimodal therapy eligibility criteria as per the European Association of Urology guidelines were identified. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. RESULTS Median overall survival was 27.0 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 20.3-58.3 months), 5-years overall-, cancer-specific- and recurrence-free survival rates were 37.5% (95 % CI: 25.5-49.5 %), 60 % (95 % CI: 48.3-72.0 %), and 17.9 % (95 % CI: 9.3-28.8 %), respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the trimodal therapy-eligible and non-eligible patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38, P=0.30 and HR: 0.96, P=0.90, respectively). The univariate analysis did not reveal any significant prognostic factors associated with recurrence-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION Trimodal therapy offers encouraging specific survival, the prognosis remains poor. Our study highlights the low number and high frailty of patients to whom trimodal therapy is offered in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolinne Brassart
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Coutte
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU d'Amiens, 1, rue du Professeur-Christian-Cabrol, 80000 Amiens, France
| | - Jennifer Wallet
- Methodology and Biostatistics unit, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Emmanuel Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Ahmed Benyoucef
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - Hajer Mnif
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - Vincent Kowalski
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU d'Amiens, 1, rue du Professeur-Christian-Cabrol, 80000 Amiens, France
| | - Maël Barthoulot
- Methodology and Biostatistics unit, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France; Centre de recherche en informatique, signal et automatique de Lille, Cristal UMR 9189, université de Lille, Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Xu J, Tang Z. Progress on angiogenic and antiangiogenic agents in the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1491099. [PMID: 39629004 PMCID: PMC11611712 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1491099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The development of tumors and their metastasis relies heavily on the process of angiogenesis. When the volume of a tumor expands, the resulting internal hypoxic conditions trigger the body to enhance the production of various angiogenic factors. These include vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), all of which work together to stimulate the activation of endothelial cells and catalyze angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic therapy (AAT) aims to normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting these angiogenic signals. In this review, we will explore the molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis within the tumor microenvironment, discuss traditional antiangiogenic drugs along with their limitations, examine new antiangiogenic drugs and the advantages of combination therapy, and consider future research directions in the field of antiangiogenic drugs. This comprehensive overview aims to provide insights that may aid in the development of more effective anti-tumor treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhihua Tang
- Department of Pharmacy, Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Roumiguié M, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Bajeot AS, Allory Y, Sargos P, Leon P, Audenet F, Xylinas E, Pradère B, Prost D, Seisen T, Thibault C, Masson-Lecomte A, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102741. [PMID: 39581664 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was carried out, taking into account the elements of the diagnosis, the treatment options and the monitoring of NMIBC and MIBC, evaluating the references with their level of evidence. RESULTS MIBC is diagosed after the must complete tumor resection possible . CT-Urography coupled with chest CT scans are used to assess the extent of MIBC. Multiparametric pelvic MRI may be an alternative imaging approach. Cystectomy combined with standard lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for nonmetastatic MIBC. Neoadjuvant cispaltine-based chemotherapy should be used in patients in good general health with satisfactory renal function. Enterocystoplasty is proposed for men and women in the absence of contraindications and when urethral recutting is negative on extemporaneous examination; otherwise, transileal cutaneous ureterostomy is the recommended method of urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an improved recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab is recommended. Second-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended. CONCLUSION Updating the ccAFU recommendations should improve patient management and enhance the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude-Huriez Hospital, CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277, Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies (CANTHER), 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Teoh JYC, Shariat SF. Bladder sparing options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:471-476. [PMID: 39224913 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review critically evaluates the current state of bladder-sparing options in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and provides an overview of future directions in the field. RECENT FINDINGS Bladder-sparing treatments have emerged as viable alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for selected patients with MIBC, especially in those who are unfit for RC or elect bladder preservation. Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of trimodal therapy (TMT), with outcomes comparable to RC in a subgroup of well selected patients. Combining immunotherapy with conventional treatments in bladder-sparing approaches can yield promising outcomes. Current research is making significant progress in optimizing treatment protocols by exploring new combinations of systemic therapy agents, innovative drug delivery methods, and biomarker-based approaches. Furthermore, clinical markers of response are being tested to ensure adequate response assessment. SUMMARY Bladder preservation promise to offer a viable alternative to RC for selected patients with MIBC with the potential to improve patient quality of life. Careful patient selection and ongoing research are essential to optimize patient selection, response assessment, and salvage strategies. As evidence continues to evolve, the role of bladder preservation in MIBC is likely to expand, providing patients with more treatment options tailored to their needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ditonno F, Veccia A, Montanaro F, Pettenuzzo G, Franco A, Manfredi C, Triggiani L, De Nunzio C, De Sio M, Cerruto M, Crivellaro S, Kutikov A, Autorino R, Antonelli A. Trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int 2024; 134:684-695. [PMID: 38622957 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing trimodal therapy (TMT) and radical cystectomy (RC), evaluating differences in terms of oncological outcomes, quality of life, and costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS In July 2023, a literature search of multiple databases was conducted to identify studies analysing patients with cT2-4 N any M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC; Patients) receiving TMT (Intervention) compared to RC (Comparison), to evaluate survival outcomes, recurrence rates, costs, and quality of life (Outcomes). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to analyse survival outcomes according to different treatment modalities and odds ratios were used to evaluate the likelihood of receiving each type of treatment according to T stage. RESULTS No significant difference in terms of OS was observed between RC and TMT (HR 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.4; P = 0.6), even when analysing radiation therapy regimens ≥60 Gy (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69-1.52; P = 0.9). No significant difference was observed in CSS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.79-1.57, P = 0.5) or MFS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66-1.16; P = 0.3). The mean cost of TMT was significantly higher than that of RC ($289 142 vs $148 757; P < 0.001), with greater effectiveness in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year. TMT ensured significantly higher general quality-of-life scores. CONCLUSION Trimodal therapy appeared to yield comparable oncological outcomes to RC concerning OS, CSS and MFS, while providing superior patient quality of life and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco De Sio
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Simone Crivellaro
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pakmanesh H, Khajehsalimi A, Hesamarefi M, Ebadzadeh MR, Bazrafshan A, Malekpourafshar R, Mirzaei M, Daneshpajouh A, Shahesmaeili A, Eslami N. Comparison of the overall survival of different treatment methods in patients with Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A retrospective study. Urologia 2024; 91:687-694. [PMID: 38867469 DOI: 10.1177/03915603241256009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bladder-Sparing Approach was presented in patients who are not willing or not suitable for Radical Cystectomy (RC). There have been inconsistencies in the literature regarding the comparison of survival rates of these two methods. Our objective is to evaluate the survival rate of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing different treatment methods. DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING A secondary care, multicenter study in Kerman, Iran 2008 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS All 200 patients who were diagnosed with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and were admitted to our hospitals. Patients with inaccessible medical files and patients with pathologies other than TCC were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Radical cystectomy and different methods of bladder preservation were compared based on their survival rate. INTERVENTIONS Radical cystectomy or bladder preservation. RESULTS Overall survival of the patients was 2 years [95% CI: 1.37-2.63]. The overall 5-year survival rate of patients with MIBC was 32%. Having a 6.4 years overall survival, the RC group showed the highest survival compared with others (p = 0.01); the overall survival of patients undergoing TMT, TURT, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy monotherapy was 3.15 years [95% CI: 2.242-4.061], 4.06 [95% CI: 3.207-4.931], 2.58 [95% CI: 1.767-3.399], and 3.14 [95% CI: 1.614-4.672] years, respectively. Patients younger than 65 undergoing RC had an overall survival of 7 years, compared with 2 years for the TMT group. (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The Bladder-Preservation method, as a replacement for RC, showed a lower overall survival rate in our study. A prospective randomized clinical trial may declare the best treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Pakmanesh
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Azadeh Khajehsalimi
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammadamin Hesamarefi
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohamad Reza Ebadzadeh
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Azam Bazrafshan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Reza Malekpourafshar
- Pathology and Stem Cell Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mahboubeh Mirzaei
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Azar Daneshpajouh
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Armita Shahesmaeili
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Nazanin Eslami
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Riou O, Hennequin C, Khalifa J, Sargos P. News and prospects on radiotherapy for bladder cancer: Is trimodal therapy becoming the gold standard? Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:623-627. [PMID: 39384515 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/11/2024]
Abstract
Trimodal therapy consisting of transurethral resection of bladder tumors followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has emerged as a valuable therapeutic alternative to radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy is a component of trimodality increasing locoregional control compared to radiotherapy alone. The combinations 5-fluorouracil with mitomycin or cisplatin are the best supported in the literature. Gemcitabine appears to be a feasible and promising alternative. There is considerable international heterogeneity in terms of dose, volumes and fractionation. The most commonly used regimens are moderately hypofractionated (55Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) and normofractionated (64Gy in 32 fractions) regimens. Radiotherapy for bladder cancer is an effective and evolving treatment, with current technical developments, and studies of new combinations with systemic treatments underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Riou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie de Méditerranée Occitanie, université de Montpellier, Inserm U1194, Montpellier, France.
| | | | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Angelis M, Siech C, Di Bello F, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, Chun FKH, Puliatti S, Saad F, Shariat SF, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Stabile A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Survival Rates in Trimodal Therapy Versus Radiotherapy in Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00180-9. [PMID: 39366885 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Trimodal therapy (TMT) provided significant survival advantage relative to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone in prospective trials. However, the magnitude of survival benefit has not been validated in population-based studies. The objective of this study is to determine whether TMT is associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates relative to EBRT. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB) treated with either TMT or EBRT. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risk regression (CRR) models addressed CSM after additional adjustment for other-cause mortality and standard covariates. The same methodology was repeated according to stage and age categories. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Of 4471 patients, 3391 (76%) underwent TMT versus 1080 (24%) EBRT. TMT rates increased over time in the overall cohort (estimated annual percent change [EAPC]: 1.8%, p < 0.001) as well as in organ-confined (OC) stage (EAPC: 1.7%, p < 0.001), but not in non-organ-confined (NOC) stage (p = 0.051). In the overall cohort, 5-yr CSM rates were 43.6% in TMT versus 52.7% in EBRT. In multivariable CRR models, TMT was an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, p < 0.001). In OC patients, 5-yr CSM rates were 42.0% in TMT versus 51.9% in EBRT (p < 0.001). In multivariable CRR models, TMT was an independent predictor of lower CSM (HR: 0.74, p < 0.001). Conversely, in NOC patients, TMT did not achieve independent predictor status (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In this population-based study, relative to EBRT, TMT is associated with lower CSM in OC stage, but not in NOC UCUB patients. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we investigated the survival benefit of administering systemic chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy in patients who are candidates for bladder-sparing strategies. We found that the combination of systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy leads to improved cancer-specific survival compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with organ-confined urothelial carcinoma. We conclude that among patients who are candidates for bladder-sparing strategies, following transurethral resection, the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (namely, trimodal therapy) should always be offered in those with organ-confined urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, AOU di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Trimodal therapy effect on survival in urothelial vs non-urothelial bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 134:602-607. [PMID: 38494989 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To address cancer-specific mortality free-survival (CSM-FS) differences in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) vs non-UCUB who underwent trimodal therapy (TMT), according to organ confined (OC: T2N0M0) vs non-organ confined (NOC: T3-4NanyM0 or TanyN1-3M0) clinical stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0-N3M0 bladder cancer treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumour, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM in UCUB vs non-UCUB according to OC vs NOC stages. RESULTS Of 5130 assessable TMT-treated patients, 425 (8%) harboured non-UCUB vs 4705 (92%) who had UCUB. The TMT rates increased for patients with OC UCUB from 92.4% to 96.8% (estimated annual percentage change of 0.4%, P < 0.001), but not in the NOC stages (P = 0.3). In the OC stage, the median CSM-FS was 36 months in patients with non-UCUB vs 60 months in those with UCUB, respectively (P = 0.01). Conversely, in the NOC stage, the median CSM-FS was 23 months both in UCUB and non-UCUB (P = 0.9). In the MCR models addressing OC stage, non-UCUB histology independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio 1.45, P = 0.004), but not in the NOC stage (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION In OC UCUB, TMT rates have increased over time in a guideline-consistent fashion. Patients with OC non-UCUB treated with TMT showed a CSM disadvantage relative to OC UCUB. In the NOC stage, use of TMT resulted in dismal CSM, regardless of UCUB vs non-UCUB histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Achard V, Fournier B, D'Haese D, Krzystyniak J, Tombal B, Roupret M, Sargos P, Dirix P. Radiotherapy Combined with a Radiosensitizer for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive Non-muscle-invasive Carcinoma In Situ Bladder Cancer: An Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:982-985. [PMID: 38556413 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion is the standard of care for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, many patients are unwilling or unable to undergo such major surgery associated with high morbidity and a negative impact on quality of life. Chemoradiotherapy is an established treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it has not been investigated adequately in NMIBC until now. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 2235 study (NCT06310369) is designed as a multicenter, prospective, international, phase 2 trial of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with a radiosensitizer in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) who are not eligible for or declined to undergo radical cystectomy. Patients who have received nadofaragene firadenovec or TAR-200 are eligible. The primary endpoint is the 6-mo complete response (CR) rate defined by the absence of CIS proven by a control biopsy of the bladder. The secondary endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, durability of CR, grade 3-4 adverse events rate, patients' quality of life, and organ preservation rate. PATIENT SUMMARY: Intravesical instillation of bacillus Calmette-Guérin is the standard treatment of non-muscle-invasive, also coined as superficial, bladder cancer. In case the cancer recurs, even superficially, there is no other proven treatment than a radical cystectomy-the surgical removal of the bladder. Although the surgical technique has improved dramatically over the past few years, it remains contraindicated in patients with severe comorbidities. In addition, because it affects the quality of life, patients may reject this option. This study will assess the efficacy of external beam radiotherapy, a robust alternative to surgery in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radiotherapy will be administered 5 d a week for 4 wk. It will be associated with a "radiosensitizer," an intravenous or oral drug, during the radiotherapy treatment. The study will measure the proportion of patients remaining recurrence free at 6 mo and thereafter. It will also evaluate the safety of the treatment and its impact on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Béatrice Fournier
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David D'Haese
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joanna Krzystyniak
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 PARIS, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sheybaee Moghaddam F, Dwabe S, Mar N, Safdari L, Sabharwal N, Goldberg H, Daneshvar M, Rezazadeh Kalebasty A. The Role of Maximal TURBT in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Balancing Benefits in Bladder Preservation and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3361. [PMID: 39409980 PMCID: PMC11475991 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection and urinary diversion is the gold-standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, in patients who refuse cystectomy, or in whom cystectomy carries a high risk, bladder-preserving therapies remain potential options. Bladder preservation therapies can include maximal debulking transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), concurrent chemoradiation therapy, followed by cystoscopy to assess response. At this time, maximal TURBT is recommended for patients prior to the initiation of chemoradiation therapy or in patients with residual bladder tumors after the completion of chemoradiation therapy. That being said, TURBT carries significant risks such as bladder perforation, bleeding, and infection, ultimately risking delayed systemic treatment. Hence, understanding its role within trimodal therapy is crucial to avoid undue suffering in patients. Herein, we review the current literature on the impact of debulking TURBT in non-metastatic MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sami Dwabe
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Nataliya Mar
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Leila Safdari
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Navin Sabharwal
- Department of Urology, University of Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.S.)
| | - Hanan Goldberg
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA;
| | - Michael Daneshvar
- Department of Urology, University of Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.S.)
| | - Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA; (N.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kaufmann E, Aeppli S, Arnold W, Balermpas P, Beyer J, Bieri U, Cathomas R, de Bari B, Dressler M, Engeler DS, Erdmann A, Gallina A, Gomez S, Guckenberger M, Herrmann TRW, Hermanns T, Ilaria L, John H, Kessler TM, Klein J, Laouiti M, Lauffer D, Mattei A, Müntener M, Nguyen D, Niederberger P, Papachristofilou A, Prause L, Reinhardt K, Salati E, Sèbe P, Shelan M, Strebel R, Templeton AJ, Vogl U, Wettstein MS, Zihler D, Zilli T, Zwahlen D, Roth B, Fankhauser C. Follow-up strategies after trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol 2024; 42:527. [PMID: 39297968 PMCID: PMC11413066 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Optimal follow-up strategies following trimodal treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer play a crucial role in detecting and managing relapse and side-effects. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the patterns and risk factors of relapse, functional outcomes, and follow-up protocols. METHODS A systematic literature search on PubMed and review of current guidelines and institutional follow-up protocols after trimodal therapy were conducted. RESULTS Out of 200 identified publications, 43 studies (28 retrospective, 15 prospective) were selected, encompassing 7447 patients (study sizes from 24 to 728 patients). Recurrence rates in the urinary bladder varied between 14-52%; 3-16% were muscle-invasive while 11-36% were non-muscle invasive. Nodal recurrence occurred at 13-16% and distant metastases at 15-35%. After 5 and 10 years of follow-up, around 60-85% and 45-75% of patients could preserve their bladder, respectively. Various prognostic risk factors associated with relapse and inferior survival were proposed, including higher disease stage (> c/pT2), presence of extensive/multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS), hydronephrosis, multifocality, histological subtypes, incomplete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and incomplete response to radio-chemotherapy. The analyzed follow-up guidelines varied slightly in terms of the number, timing, and types of investigations, but overall, the recommendations were similar. CONCLUSION Randomized prospective studies should focus on evaluating the impact of specific follow-up protocols on oncological and functional outcomes following trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. It is crucial to evaluate personalized adaption of follow-up protocols based on established risk factors, as there is potential for improved patient outcomes and resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest Kaufmann
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Aeppli
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Winfried Arnold
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Universitiy Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- Department of Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Bieri
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Berardino de Bari
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel S Engeler
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Erdmann
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Gomez
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas R W Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape, South Africa
- Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Lucca Ilaria
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kessler
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Klein
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Müsterlingen, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mohamed Laouiti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Hôpital Riviera Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - David Lauffer
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel Nguyen
- Department of Urology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Lukas Prause
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | | | - Emanuela Salati
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Riviera Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Sèbe
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Räto Strebel
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Chur, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Department of Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel and Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Vogl
- Department of Oncology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | - Deborah Zihler
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, EOC Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Beat Roth
- Department of Urology, Inselspital Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Christian Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University of Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Paz C, Glassey A, Frick A, Sattar S, Zaorsky NG, Blitzer GC, Kimple RJ. Cancer therapy-related salivary dysfunction. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e182661. [PMID: 39225092 PMCID: PMC11364403 DOI: 10.1172/jci182661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Salivary gland dysfunction is a common side effect of cancer treatments. Salivary function plays key roles in critical daily activities. Consequently, changes in salivary function can profoundly impair quality of life for cancer patients. We discuss salivary gland anatomy and physiology to understand how anticancer therapies such as chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy impair salivary function. We discuss approaches to quantify xerostomia in the clinic, including the advantages and limitations of validated quality-of-life instruments and approaches to directly measuring salivary function. Current and emerging approaches to treat cancer therapy-induced dry mouth are presented using radiation-induced salivary dysfunction as a model. Limitations of current sialagogues and salivary analogues are presented. Emerging approaches, including cellular and gene therapy and novel pharmacologic approaches, are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Paz
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Annemarie Glassey
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Abigail Frick
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sarah Sattar
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nicholas G. Zaorsky
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Grace C. Blitzer
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Randall J. Kimple
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Herzberg H, Ventura Y, Lifshitz K, Savin Z, Golan S, Baniel J, Yossepowitch O, Mano R. Natural history and health care burden of non-curative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:246.e7-246.e13. [PMID: 38641474 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is an aggressive disease. Yet, many patients, especially those with advanced age and multiple comorbidities, do not receive treatment with curative intent. We evaluated the disease course and health care burden of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bi-center, retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who did not undergo curative-intent treatment (radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy) between 2016 and 2021. Patient characteristics and treatment burden were described. Metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survivals were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Sixty-six patients with a median age of 86 (IQR 78,90) were evaluated. The median follow-up for survivors was 29 months (IQR 9, 44). All patients were diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and 32 (48%) presented with clinical T3 and T4 disease. The median age adjusted Charlson comorbidity index at diagnosis was 7 (IQR 6,8). Treatment with curative intent was not provided due to comorbidities and low-performance status in 58 patients (88%) and patient refusal in 8 (12%). Two-year estimated metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 11%, 18%, and 12%, respectively. During follow-up, 7 patients (10%) were treated with chemotherapy, 4 (6%) received immunotherapy, 21 (32%) radiation, and 17 (26%) had emergent operations due to hematuria. Twenty-four patients (37%) required nephrostomy tubes, and 39 (59%) required an indwelling urinary catheter for various periods. Forty-three patients (65%) suffered from recurrent hematuria episodes. Overall, median emergency room visits were 4 (IQR 2, 6), and median hospital admission was 16 days (IQR 9, 29). CONCLUSIONS Untreated muscle-invasive bladder cancer is associated with a limited lifespan and a high disease burden for the patient and health system. These data should be taken into consideration and portrayed to the patient when curative intent treatment is chosen to be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haim Herzberg
- Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yossi Ventura
- Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Karin Lifshitz
- Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ziv Savin
- Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shay Golan
- Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jack Baniel
- Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofer Yossepowitch
- Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roy Mano
- Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Davis R, Ladbury C, Tsai K, Maraghechi B, Shi C, Li R, Glaser S, Dandapani S, Wong J, Williams T, Lee P. CT-Guided Online Adaptive Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Primary Bladder Cancer: A Report of Two Cases. Cureus 2024; 16:e67318. [PMID: 39301330 PMCID: PMC11412277 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Trimodality treatment for bladder cancer, consisting of maximal transurethral resection of the tumor followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, is an attractive management option with curative and organ-sparing intent. However, such treatment can be associated with acute toxicities related to the large treatment margins required due to daily variation in bladder filling, with resultant bladder, bowel, and rectal toxicity. Adaptive radiation, which accounts for inter-fraction variations in bladder size, allows the confident delivery of radiation to bladder cancer with smaller margins, with the potential to reduce toxicities without the associated risk of compromising the target coverage. Herein, we present a case series of two patients with primary bladder cancer who were treated with computed tomography (CT)-based online adaptive hypofractionated radiotherapy using the Ethos system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The first is an 83-year-old male with a remote history of prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, who received adaptive radiotherapy as a means of decreasing the required margin size and optimizing planning based on adjacent bowel to reduce the risk of re-irradiation. The second patient is a 78-year-old male with node-positive bladder cancer, which necessitated whole pelvis radiotherapy, who underwent adaptive treatment (25 fractions) as a means of sparing cumulative dose to the bowel while ensuring suitable target coverage. In both cases, the clinical target volume consisted of the entire bladder (± nodes) with a planning target volume expansion of 7 mm. During treatment, daily cone-beam CT scans were acquired and used to generate adapted plans. These plans were compared to the original plans, with attention to target coverage and dose to organs at risk. For all 45 fractions, the adaptive plan was selected, primarily as a means of improving target coverage. This case series demonstrates that the adaptive Ethos system effectively delivers treatment for primary bladder cancer. Further data are needed for clinical toxicity outcomes and the efficacy of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Davis
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, USA
| | - Kevin Tsai
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, USA
| | - Borna Maraghechi
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, USA
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, USA
| | - Rose Li
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Scott Glaser
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Savita Dandapani
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Jeffrey Wong
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Terence Williams
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
de Angelis M, Scheipner L, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Baudo A, Bello FD, Goyal JA, Vitucci K, Tian Z, Longo N, Ahyai S, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Temporal Trends and Cancer-Specific Mortality in Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Treated With Trimodal Therapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102119. [PMID: 38852435 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trimodal therapy (TMT) is guideline-recommended for the management of organ confined urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, temporal trends in TMT use and cancer-specific mortality free-survival (CSM-FS) between historical TMT versus contemporary TMT have not been assessed. We addressed this knowledge gap. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified nonmetastatic UCUB patients with cT2-T4aN0-N2 treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Subsequently, patients were divided between historical (2004-2012) versus contemporary (2013-2020) cohorts. Survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM-FS. Separate analyses addressed patients with organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined (NOC: cT3-4a and/or cN1-2) clinical stages. RESULTS Of 4,097 assessable UCUB TMT patients, 1744 (43%) were treated in the historical period (2004-2012) versus 2353 (58%) in the contemporary period (2013-2020). TMT use increased over time in OC patients (EAPC:+3.4%, P < .001), as well as in NOC (EAPC:+2.7%, P < .001). In OC stage, median CSM-FS was 55.3% in historical versus 49.0% in contemporary patients (HR:0.75, P < .001). Similarly, in NOC stage, 5-year median CSM-FS was 43.0% in historical versus 32.8% in contemporary patients (HR:0.78, P = .01). CONCLUSION TMT rates have increased over time in both OC and NOC patients. Contemporary TMT patients benefit of better cancer-specific survival. Interestingly, this benefit applies equally to OC and NOC TMT-treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital, Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Kira Vitucci
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Departmen of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Department of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nguyen NP, Karlsson UL, Page BR, Chirila ME, Vinh-Hung V, Gorobets O, Arenas M, Mohammadianpanah M, Javadinia SA, Giap H, Kim L, Dutheil F, Murthy V, Mallum AA, Tlili G, Dahbi Z, Loganadane G, Blanco SC, Bose S, Natoli E, Li E, Morganti AG. Immunotherapy and radiotherapy for older patients with invasive bladder cancer unfit for surgery or chemotherapy: practical proposal by the international geriatric radiotherapy group. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1371752. [PMID: 39026981 PMCID: PMC11254657 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1371752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer is either radical cystectomy or bladder preservation therapy, which consists of maximal transurethral bladder resection of the tumor followed by concurrent chemoradiation with a cisplatin-based regimen. However, for older cancer patients who are too frail for surgical resection or have decreased renal function, radiotherapy alone may offer palliation. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has emerged as a promising treatment when combined with radiotherapy due to the synergy of those two modalities. Transitional carcinoma of the bladder is traditionally a model for immunotherapy with an excellent response to Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in early disease stages, and with avelumab and atezolizumab for metastatic disease. Thus, we propose an algorithm combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy for older patients with locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are not candidates for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Phong Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ulf Lennart Karlsson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brandi R. Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Monica-Emilia Chirila
- Department of Clinical Development, MVision AI, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Public du Contentin, Cherbour-en-Contentin, France
| | - Olena Gorobets
- Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant Joan de Reus University Hospital, University of Rovira, I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Huan Giap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Lyndon Kim
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Fabien Dutheil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Sainte Clotilde, Saint Denis, Reunion, France
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Abba Aji Mallum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Ghassen Tlili
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Center, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Zineb Dahbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | | - Sergio Calleja Blanco
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Satya Bose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elena Natoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, DIMEC, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eric Li
- Department of Pathology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Alessio G. Morganti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, DIMEC, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ben-David R, Galsky MD, Sfakianos JP. Novel bladder-sparing approaches in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Trends Mol Med 2024; 30:686-697. [PMID: 38692938 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
The pursuit of surgeons and oncologists in fulfilling the inherent desire of patients to retain their urinary bladder despite having muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has sparked years of research and multiple debates, given its aggressive nature and the high risk of fatal metastatic recurrence. Historically, several approaches to bladder-sparing treatment have been explored, ranging from radical transurethral resection to concurrent chemoradiation. A less well-established approach involves a risk-adapted approach with local therapy deferred based on the clinical response to transurethral resection followed by systemic therapy. Each approach is associated with potential risks, benefits, and trade-offs. In this review, we aim to understand, navigate, and suggest future perspectives on bladder-sparing approaches in patients with MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben Ben-David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|