Acceptable Risk: Who Decides?

Accurate Plane Fat Grafting in Gluteal Augmentation: An Anatomic Study

BACKGROUND

The safety of gluteal fat grafting is a global concern in plastic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to test whether fat grafting to the buttocks with Auto Stop Reach (ASR) technology prevents penetration from the subcutaneous space into the fascia and muscle layers of the buttocks.

METHODS

Fat transfer simulation was performed with blue dye on 8 fresh tissue cadaver buttocks by 3 board-certified plastic surgeons (S.S.K., S.C., B.W.). An open control was utilized to visualize the process in the different anatomic layers, and all of the other procedures were performed blindly, akin to live surgery. After blue dye transfer reached maximum capacity (ranging from 400-800 mL per buttock), dissection of the anatomical layers of the buttocks was performed to determine the plane(s) of injection.

RESULTS

Blue dye fat transfer injection to the buttocks did not penetrate the gluteal fascia or muscle layers from the subcutaneous space while using ASR.

CONCLUSIONS

Auto Stop Reach technology supports the safety of gluteal fat transfer in the subcutaneous space by board-certified plastic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Brazilian Butt Lift-Associated Mortality: The South Florida Experience

BACKGROUND

Brazilian butt lift (BBL) surgery has been the fastest growing aesthetic surgical procedure over the past decade. By 2017, the risk of death from pulmonary fat (PFE) was identified, earning the BBL the highest mortality rate of any aesthetic surgical procedure. South Florida carries the highest BBL mortality by far in the nation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the factors involved in making South Florida an outlier in terms of BBL mortality.

METHODS

The anatomic findings of the gluteal dissections from 11 post-BBL surgery autopsies (22 hemibuttocks) were assessed for commonalities. The public records of patients who died from BBL-related fat emboli were examined to determine commonalities.

RESULTS

All BBL PFE cases had fat grafts injected into the gluteal musculature in multiple different levels. Another commonality involved the location where the surgery took place, with the great majority of patients (92%) undergoing surgery at high-volume, budget clinics located in South Florida. Short surgical times of approximately 90 minutes appeared to be the norm for these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

South Florida has experienced 25 BBL-related fat emboli deaths between 2010 and 2022; however, 14 of these occurred after publication of the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation's 2018 guidelines and the 2019 Florida Board of Medicine's BBL "subcutaneous-only" rule. The working environment at the clinics, and the short surgical times for these cases, may be the most important contributors to the BBL mortality in South Florida.

Perception of Risk Among Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

With continuous innovation in plastic surgery, new procedures are constantly being introduced. A number of these procedures are generally safe but have the potential for rare yet serious complications. Many surgeons steer clear of these procedures due to safety concerns.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper was to survey the membership of The Aesthetic Society to elicit perception of risk of several novel or less mainstream procedures.

METHODS

A 24-item survey was sent out to members of The Aesthetic Society. The survey focused on surgeon experience and attitude towards 3 procedures: filler rhinoplasty, gluteal augmentation with fat grafting, and submandibular gland excision.

RESULTS

In total, 189 completed surveys were returned. Of the responders, 50%, 49%, and 89% of surgeons said they do not perform filler rhinoplasty, gluteal augmentation with fat grafting, or submandibular gland excision in their practices, respectively. The majority of those who do not perform the procedures selected "danger to the patient" as the primary concern for each of the 3 procedures. Surgeons overwhelmingly reported not learning these procedures in training. Additionally, surgeons perceive the risks of more common procedures such as abdominoplasty and breast augmentation-mastopexy to be significantly lower and more acceptable than those of the studied procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the perceived complication rates with data published in the literature, particularly when looking at rates of serious or life-threatening complications, plastic surgeons overestimate the risks of procedures with which they are less familiar. This perception of risk, accompanied by the lack of exposure to novel techniques in training, may contribute to surgeons avoiding these procedures.

Safety Considerations of Fat Grafting in Buttock Augmentation

Autologous fat grafting for buttock augmentation is one of the fastest growing plastic surgery procedures, but has also received significant publicity for the relatively high mortality rate secondary to fat emboli. The literature has grown exponentially in the past 5 years on this subject, helping to clarify our knowledge and providing recommendations to minimize risks, including avoiding intramuscular injections, placing the patient in the jackknife position, and utilizing larger-bore cannulas. Since the application of these recommendations, the rate of pulmonary fat embolism has decreased from 0.097% to 0.04%, with a current mortality of 1 in 14,921, making it statistically safer than abdominoplasty. Despite the evolution in our knowledge, techniques, and outcomes, it remains of utmost importance to properly select and educate patients about the safety of fat grafting for buttock augmentation. Level of Evidence: 4.

Improving the Female Silhouette and Gluteal Projection: An Anatomy-Based, Safe, and Harmonious Approach Through Liposuction, Suspension Loops, and Moderate Lipofilling

BACKGROUND

Liposuction is the main technique to improve body contour, emphasize appealing curves, and highlight one's muscular definition. The number of procedures in which the harvested fat is utilized for gluteal augmentation has greatly increased.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aim to demonstrate their technique in order to obtain a sculpted harmonious body through a safe procedure, as well as review their 101 consecutive cases between 2014 and 2018.

METHODS

Anatomical guidelines and preoperative markings were provided to guide the 3-step procedure: zones of maximal and mild liposuction, barbed wire suspension, and moderate fat grafting. Novel concepts are introduced as the anterior body diagonal, posterior body diagonal as well as other specific axes the pubic unit, and a vertical ratio for the buttock, which are the basic foundations for sculpting the female body into a pleasing hourglass shape with a well projected buttock. Recommendations for location of sacral diamond, sacral dimples, and the maximally projected point of the buttock are given. The authors explain their philosophy through 4 principles: knowledge of anatomy, the relationship between specific body areas and surrounding zones, a balanced gluteal augmentation is not achieved through large volume fat grafting alone, and grafting in the subcutaneous layer.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were treated following the described technique and examples are shown. The complication rate was low. No serious adverse effects were recorded apart from 1 ruptured suspension loop.

CONCLUSIONS

The described anatomy-based approach, including liposuction, suspension loops, and fat grafting, is a novel and safe technique leading to a desirable, long-lasting outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Gluteal Augmentation With Fat: Retrospective Safety Study and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Use of gluteal augmentation with fat increased by 3267% from 2002 to 2015, and the rate of death is highest compared with other aesthetic procedures: 1 in 3448 patients dies, compared with 1 in 55,000.

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively investigate patients who underwent this procedure at Oslo Plastic Surgery Clinic, to review international data to determine factors causing mortality, and to provide guidelines for safety.

METHODS

Patient data were searched for reason for the procedure, assessment of patients, techniques performed, and safety measures used. In 60 cases, a vibration machine was used for fat harvesting. Review of the international literature, with special emphasis on fatal complications, was performed on Medline, Google Scholar, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 32 years. Mean amount of grafted fat was 422 mL (range, 210-850 mL). Sedation, local and tumescent anesthesia were used in all patients, with mobilization directly after surgery. Mean operation time was 89 minutes. Eighteen patients required a second surgery. Minor complications occurred in 8 patients. Average follow-up was 8 months. Ninety percent of patients were satisfied. Review of international literature showed that the main reason for death in 2015 was fat lung embolism related to muscular and submuscular grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Gluteal augmentation with fat is one of the most popular procedures, with an internationally high mortality rate. Patient safety is a priority, and preventive measures should improve safety because appropriate patient selection, avoiding muscular and submuscular grafting, avoiding infragluteal incision, moderate grafted volume, and direct postoperative mobilization are essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4