Intellectual Prognosis of Status Epilepticus in Adult Epilepsy Patients: Analysis with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised

Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: Therapeutic Options and Prognosis

In patients with status epilepticus (SE), the underlying biologic background represents the main prognostic variable. A swift application of a treatment protocol is recommended, including adequate doses of a benzodiazepine followed by an intravenous anti-seizure medicine. If refractory SE arises, general anesthetics should be used in generalized convulsive and non-convulsive SE in coma, while further non-sedating anti-seizure medications attempts are warranted in patients with focal forms. Ketogenic diet and/or ketamine in patients with super-refractory SE, and immunologic treatments for those with new-onset refractory SE/febrile-induced refractory epilepsy syndrome should be considered early. Pharmacologic treatment of SE after cardiac arrest should be oriented by the results of multimodal prognostication.

Clinician-Reported Physical and Cognitive Impairments After Convulsive Status Epilepticus: Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures are emerging as useful contributors to assessments of treatment benefits. The objective of this study was to collect ClinRO measures of physical and cognitive impairments after convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) requiring intensive care unit admission.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the data from HYBERNATUS, a multicenter open-label controlled trial that randomized 270 critically ill patients with CSE requiring mechanical ventilation in 11 French intensive care units to therapeutic hypothermia (32-34 °C for 24 h) plus standard care or standard care alone. We included all patients who attended a day 90 in-person neurologist visit with measurement of the functional independence measure (FIM) score (range from 18 [total assistance] to 126 [total independence]), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (range 0-30), and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score (1, death; 2, vegetative state; 3, severe disability; 4, moderate disability; and 5, mild or no disability). These three scores were compared across groups defined by several patient and CSE characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 229 patients with GOS scores ≥ 3 on day 90 (male sex, 58.2%; median age, 56 years [47-67]), 67 (29%) attended an in-person neurologist visit. Twenty-nine (43%) patients had a previous history of epilepsy, and 16 (24%) patients had a primary brain insult. CSE was refractory in 22 (33%) patients. On day 90 after CSE onset, median FIM and MMSE scores were 121 (112-125) and 26.0 (24.0-28.8), respectively. The GOS score was 3 in 16 (33.8%) patients, 4 in 9 (13.4%) patients, and 5 in 42 (62.7%) patients. Worse GOS score values were significantly associated with worse FIM and MMSE scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients attending the in-person neurologist visit on day 90 after CSE onset, ClinRO measures indicated that the main impairments were cognitive. FIM and MMSE scores were associated with GOS scores. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible impact of neuroprotective and rehabilitation strategies on disability and cognitive impairments in survivors of CSE. Clinical trial registration NCT01359332.

Patient-reported outcomes in adults after status epilepticus: A systematic review

Impairments after status epilepticus have generally been assessed by physicians, using generic scales. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) directly reflect each patient's experience and are therefore recommended to improve patient-centered care. The objective of this systematic review was to compile the available information on patient-reported outcomes of adults after status epilepticus. We used Medical Subject Headings terms to search PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to February 2023. We excluded reviews, case reports, abstract-only reports, editorials, and publications in languages other than English or French. Studies reporting PROs in adults after SE were eligible. Bias in included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Given the heterogeneity in assessment tools and outcomes, most of the results are presented separately for each included study. Only three studies met our criteria. All used an observational cohort design. Two were retrospective and one prospective. Of the 141 patients (76 males and 65 females, mean age 43-63 years), 105 (74.4 %) had a history of epilepsy before status epilepticus. The studies used four epilepsy-specific and five generic tools to assess five patient-reported outcomes: quality of life (n = 141), mental health (depression, n = 81, or anxiety, n = 49), physical health including fatigue (n = 130), return to work (n = 49), and side effects of antiepileptic drugs (n = 81). A single study (n = 81) was of good methodological quality. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mental health were the most extensively studied outcomes, and both were impaired. HRQOL scores ranged from 41.7 ± 11.5 to 48.3 ± 24.5. The prevalence of depression and anxiety varied from 30 % to 36 %, and from 22 % to 62 %, respectively. However, data were not collected before the status epilepticus episode, and the possible impact of this last on the outcomes cannot therefore be assessed. Information on PROs of adults after status epilepticus is extremely scant. Patient-reported outcomes should be collected more widely in adults after status epilepticus.

Long-term follow-up of phenobarbital versus valproate for generalized convulsive status epilepticus in adults: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous phenobarbital is frequently offered to patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) in China, but its long-term benefits are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of intravenous phenobarbital on adult patients with GCSE.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up was performed in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China) between February 2011 and December 2021. After the failure of intravenous diazepam treatment, adult patients with GCSE were randomized to receive either intravenous phenobarbital or valproate. Neurological outcome within 12-month was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-2) or poor (mRS 3-6). Cognitive function was measured by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) were tested for mood disorders.

RESULTS

We consecutively recruited 166 patients with GCSE. After excluding individuals with termination after intravenous diazepam (n = 61), and with other exclusion criteria (n = 7), 98 patients were included and 88.0% (66/75) of survivors achieved seizure freedom at 12-month. Forty-five patients (45.92%) had good outcomes at 3-month and 57 patients (58.16%) had good outcomes at 12-month. And 46.67% (35/75) of survivors showed mRS improvement at 12-month (phenobarbital group, n = 17 vs. valproate group, n = 18, P = 0.321). Despite there was no significant difference with respect to good outcomes at 3-month (54.0% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.101), the rate of good outcomes in phenobarbital group was higher than valproate group at 12-month (68.0% vs. 47.92%, P = 0.044). A total of 43 patients successfully participated cognitive and emotional tests. Mild cognitive impairment was found in 7.14% of phenobarbital group and 50.0% in valproate group (P = 0.026). In addition, there were no significant differences with respect to anxiety (36.36% vs. 38.10%) and depression (31.82% vs. 47.62%) between the phenobarbital and valproate groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined with long term conventional therapy, intravenous phenobarbital group had more good outcomes than intravenous valproate group in Chinese adult patients with GCSE up to 12-month follow-up. This finding may prompt the option of intravenous phenobarbital especially in patients with limited access to new antiseizure drugs.

Specific profiles of new-onset vs. non-inaugural status epilepticus: From diagnosis to 1-year outcome

While new-onset status epilepticus (NOSE) is a harbinger of chronic epilepsy, prospective medical data are sparse in terms of specifying whether the evolution of status epilepticus (SE) and seizure expression in NOSE resembles what occurs in patients who have already been diagnosed with epilepsy [non-inaugural SE (NISE)] in all aspects apart from its inaugural nature. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, MRI, and EEG features that could distinguish NOSE from NISE. We conducted a prospective monocentric study in which all patients ≥18 years admitted for SE over a 6-month period were included. A total of 109 patients (63 NISE and 46 NOSE cases) were included. Despite similar modified Rankin scores before SE, several aspects of the clinical history distinguished NOSE from NISE patients. NOSE patients were older and frequently had neurological comorbidity and preexisting cognitive decline, but they had a similar prevalence of alcohol consumption to NISE patients. NOSE and NISE evolve in the same proportions as refractory SE (62.5% NOSE, 61% NISE) and share common features such as the same incidence (33% NOSE, 42% NISE, and p = 0.53) and volumes of peri-ictal abnormalities on MRI. However, in NOSE patients, we observed greater non-convulsive semiology (21.7% NOSE, 6% NISE, and p = 0.02), more periodic lateral discharges on EEG (p = 0.004), later diagnosis, and higher severity according to the STESS and EMSE scales (p < 0.0001). Mortality occurred in 32.6% of NOSE patients and 21% of NISE patients at 1 year (p = 0.19), but with different causes of death occurring at different time points: more early deaths directly linked to SE at 1 month occurred in the NOSE group, while there were more remote deaths linked to causal brain lesions in the NISE group at final follow-up. In survivors, 43.6% of the NOSE cases developed into epilepsy. Despite acute causal brain lesions, the novelty related to its inaugural nature is still too often associated with a delay in diagnosing SE and a poorer outcome, which justifies the need to more clearly specify the various types of SE to constantly raise awareness among clinicians. These results highlight the relevance of including novelty-related criteria, clinical history, and temporality of occurrence in the nosology of SE.

Brain pathology in focal status epilepticus: evidence from experimental models

Status Epilepticus (SE) is often a neurological emergency characterized by abnormally sustained, longer than habitual seizures. The new ILAE classification reports that SE "…can have long-term consequences including neuronal death, neuronal injury…depending on the type and duration of seizures". While it is accepted that generalized convulsive SE exerts detrimental effects on the brain, it is not clear if other forms of SE, such as focal non-convulsive SE, leads to brain pathology and contributes to long-term deficits in patients. With the available clinical and experimental data, it is hard to discriminate the specific action of the underlying SE etiologies from that exerted by epileptiform activity. This information is highly relevant in the clinic for better treatment stratification, which may include both medical and surgical intervention for seizure control. Here we review experimental studies of focal SE, with an emphasis on focal non-convulsive SE. We present a repertoire of brain pathologies observed in the most commonly used animal models and attempt to establish a link between experimental findings and human condition(s). The extensive literature on focal SE animal models suggest that the current approaches have significant limitations in terms of translatability of the findings to the clinic. We highlight the need for a more stringent description of SE features and brain pathology in experimental studies in animal models, to improve the accuracy in predicting clinical translation.

Neuropsychological Performance 1 Year After Status Epilepticus in Adults

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) may lead to or worsen cognitive dysfunction. Few studies have evaluated magnitude and profile of cognitive dysfunction in patients after SE. Characterization of cognitive deficits may be important for rehabilitation and follow-up. We assessed cognitive function in a consecutive, non-selected group of relatively healthy survivors with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients (24 men, 9 women; mean age 54,9 years, mean education 11,8 years) were tested 1 year after SE with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth edition (WAIS-IV), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, Phonemic and Semantic word list generation, and the Halstead-Reitan Battery. Premorbid IQ was estimated with a Norwegian version of the National Adult Reading Test (NART). Results were compared to published norms. Regression analyses and independent groups t-tests were performed to assess the influence of background variables.

RESULTS

Mean performance generally was about one standard deviation below average. Full scale IQ (WAIS-IV) was significantly reduced compared to estimated premorbid IQ (NART). Negative influence on cognition of brain lesions visible on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and duration of SE >30 min was shown by group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

SE represents a marker for possible cognitive dysfunction, and follow-up with neuropsychological assessment and cognitive rehabilitation seems warranted in most patients. Complex problem-solving abilities with high general sensitivity to brain impairment showed the most prominent reduction. Otherwise, no specific profile of domain affection was found. Structural brain lesions and duration of SE over 30 min represent risk factors for cognitive deficit.

Individual vulnerabilities to psychosis after antiepileptic drug administration

Background

Psychosis often develops after the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy. However, the individual vulnerability and clinical condition of such patients have been rarely scrutinised. We investigated the effect of individually consistent (trait-dependent) and inconsistent (state-dependent) characteristics.

Methods

The individual characteristics, clinical states and psychotic outcome of patients from eight adult epilepsy clinics were retrospectively reviewed over 6-month periods after a new drug (AED or non-AED) administration between 1981 and 2015.

Results

A total of 5018 new drugs (4402 AEDs and 616 non-AEDs) were used in 2015 patients with focal epilepsy. Subsequently, 105 psychotic episodes (81 interictal and 24 postictal) occurred in 89 patients. Twelve patients exhibited multiple episodes after different AED administrations. Trait-dependent characteristics (early onset of epilepsy, known presumed causes of epilepsy, lower intellectual function and a family history of psychosis) were significantly associated with the patients who exhibited psychosis. Absence of family history of epilepsy was also associated with psychosis but not significantly. Subsequent logistic regression analysis with a model incorporating family history of psychosis and epilepsy, and intellectual function was the most appropriate (p=0.000). State-dependent characteristics, including previous psychotic history and epilepsy-related variables (longer duration of epilepsy, AED administration, higher seizure frequency and concomitant use of AEDs) were significantly associated with psychotic episodes. Subsequent analysis found that a model including AED administration and previous psychotic history was the most appropriate (p=0.000).

Conclusion

Psychosis occurring after new AED administration was related to the individual vulnerability to psychosis and intractability of epilepsy.

Time-Dependent Impairment of Fear Conditioning and Associated Brain Regions After Pilocarpine-Induced Status Epilepticus

Our study aimed to demonstrate time-dependent declarative memory changes and its associated brain regions after status epilepticus (SE) using structural imaging techniques and machine learning methods. Pilocarpine was administrated to establish the SE model. At four different time points after SE (1, 2, 3, and 4 months, respectively), rats were subjected to structural imaging acquisition as well as contextual fear conditioning for the measurement of brain structural changes and declarative memory. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis were performed. Those significantly different regions were selected as features for training support vector machine (SVM). A linear kernel was chosen for regression of declarative memory. Leave-one-out cross-validation was applied to ensure generalization. Our results showed that the pilocarpine groups displayed the most severely impaired declarative memory at 2 months after SE and improved afterward, but failed to recover to the normal condition at 4 months after SE. The pilocarpine groups showed lower gray matter volumes and larger cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes. After controlling for the total brain volumes, ANOVA demonstrated gray matter volume changes in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus, primary somatosensory cortex, entorhinal cortex, etc. The combination of VBM and SVM identifies the somatosensory cortex and entorhinal cortex as the correlated brain regions for declarative memory dysfunctions after SE. Our study indicates that compensational mechanisms might be triggered to help with the recovery of memory functions after SE. Structural changes of the somatosensory cortex and entorhinal cortex might be involved in memory impairment after SE.

Dexamethasone as Abortive Treatment for Refractory Seizures or Status Epilepticus in the Inpatient Setting

Refractory seizures or status epilepticus (RS/SE) continues to be a challenge in the inpatient setting. Failure to abort a seizure with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may lead to intubation and treatment with general anesthesia exposing patients to complications, extending hospitalization, and increasing the cost of care. Studies have shown a key role of inflammatory mediators in seizure generation and termination. We describe 4 patients with RS/SE that was aborted when dexamethasone was added to conventional AEDs: a 61-year-old female with temporal lobe epilepsy who presented with delirium, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and oculomyoclonic status; a 56-year-old female with history of traumatic left frontal lobe hemorrhage who developed right face and hand epilepsia partialis continua followed by refractory focal clonic seizures; a 51-year-old male with history of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who exhibited left-sided epilepsia partialis continua; and a 75-year-old female with history of breast cancer who manifested nonconvulsive status epilepticus and refractory focal clonic seizures. All patients continued experiencing RS/SE despite first- and second-line therapy, and one patient continued to experience RS/SE despite third-line therapy. Failure to abort RS/SE with conventional therapy motivated us to administer intravenous dexamethasone. A 10-mg load was given (except in one patient) followed by 4.0- 5.2 mg q6h. All clinical and electrographic seizures stopped 3-4 days after starting dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was discontinued 1-3 days after seizures stopped, all patients remained seizure-free on 2-3 AEDs. The cessation of RS/SE when dexamethasone was added to conventional antiseizure therapy suggests that inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of RS/SE.

Efficacy and economic evaluation of delivery of care with tele-continuous EEG in critically ill patients: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (Tele-cRCT) study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Some critically ill patients are confirmed by continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring that non-convulsive seizure (NCS) and/or non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) are causes of their depressed level of consciousness. Shortage of epilepsy specialists, especially in developing countries, is a major limiting factor in implementing cEEG in general practice. Delivery of care with tele-continous EEG (tele-cEEG) may be a potential solution as this allows specialists from a central facility to remotely assist local neurologists from distant areas in interpreting EEG findings and suggest proper treatment. No tele-cEEG programme has been implemented to help improve quality of care. Therefore, this study is conducted to assess the efficacy and cost utility of implementing tele-cEEG in critical care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Tele-cRCT study is a 3-year prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel, multicentre, superiority trial comparing delivery of care through 'Tele-cEEG' intervention with 'Tele-routine EEG (Tele-rEEG)' in patients with clinical suspicion of NCS/NCSE. A group of EEG specialists and a tele-EEG system were set up to remotely interpret EEG findings in six regional government hospitals across Thailand. The primary outcomes are functional neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), mortality rate and incidence of seizures. The secondary outcomes are cost utility, length of stay, emergency visit/readmission, impact on changing medical decisions and health professionals' perceptions about tele-cEEG implementation. Functional outcome (mRS) will be assessed at 3 and 7 days after recruitment, and again at time of hospital discharge, and at 90 days, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. Costs and health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Thai version of the EuroQol-five dimensions-five levels (EQ-5D-5L) at hospital discharge, and at 90 days, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the ethics committees of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and of Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, and registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

TCTR20181022002; preresults.

Long-term outcomes of status epilepticus: A critical assessment

We reviewed 37 studies reporting long-term outcomes after a status epilepticus (SE) episode in pediatric and adult populations. Study design, length of follow-up, outcome measures, domains investigated (mortality, SE recurrence, subsequent epilepsy, cognitive outcome, functional outcome, or quality of life), and predictors of long-term outcomes are summarized. Despite heterogeneity in the design of prior studies, overall risk of poor long-term outcome after SE is high in both children and adults. Etiology is the main determinant of outcome, and the effect of age or SE duration is often difficult to distinguish from the underlying cause. The effect of the treatment on long-term outcome after SE is still unknown.

Immunity and inflammation in status epilepticus and its sequelae: possibilities for therapeutic application

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency often refractory to available treatment options. It is a very heterogeneous condition in terms of clinical presentation and causes, which besides genetic, vascular and other structural causes also include CNS or severe systemic infections, sudden withdrawal from benzodiazepines or anticonvulsants and rare autoimmune etiologies. Treatment of SE is essentially based on expert opinions and antiepileptic drug treatment per se seems to have no major impact on prognosis. There is, therefore, urgent need of novel therapies that rely upon a better understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying this clinical condition. Accumulating evidence in animal models highlights that inflammation ensuing in the brain during SE may play a determinant role in ongoing seizures and their long-term detrimental consequences, independent of an infection or auto-immune cause; this evidence encourages reconsideration of the treatment flow in SE patients.

Cognitive dysfunction after generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus in adults

OBJECTIVES

Generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus (GTC-SE) is considered a risk for cognitive impairment. Research with standardized tools is scarce and non-conclusive. We systematically assessed short-term and long-term cognitive function after GTC-SE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients were tested after the clinical post-ictal phase of GTC-SE (timepoint 1) and again after 1 year (timepoint 2). Twenty controls were examined with the same tests. Tests from Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery were used. Motor screening test (MOT) assessed motor speed, delayed matching to sample (DMS) and paired associates learning (PAL) assessed memory, and Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) assessed executive function. Estimated premorbid IQ and radiologically visible brain lesions were controlled for in adjusted results. Outcome measures were z-scores, the number of standard deviations a score deviates from the mean of a norm population.

RESULTS

At timepoint 1, unadjusted patient results were significantly below both norm and control group performances on all subtests. Patient mean was 1.9 z-scores below controls (P < .001) on PAL total errors. Results remained significant for PAL and DMS after adjustments. Patient results improved at timepoint 2, but memory tests remained lower than norms and for controls. An executive dysfunction emerged on the most complex SOC stage (z-score difference -0.83; P = .008, adjusted difference -0.94; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Memory and learning impairment in the early phase after SE and late developing executive dysfunction remained significant after adjusting for estimated premorbid IQ and pre-SE brain lesions. Results suggest that GTC-SE poses a risk for cognitive impairment.

Seizure activity and individual vulnerability on first-episode interictal psychosis in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Despite a theoretical consensus that interictal psychosis (IIP) is related to various epilepsy-related factors, the impact of seizure activity on development of IIP remains inconclusive. This is the first controlled study using quantitative seizure-activity measures at the onset of IIP.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients with epilepsy who exhibited first-episode IIP (IIP group) and 427 patients with epilepsy without psychotic episodes (control group) were enrolled. The control group was matched for age, epilepsy type, and duration of epilepsy. The two seizure-activity indices (seizure frequency at the time of onset of first-episode IIP and the number of seizures before the onset of IIP) were evaluated and compared between the IIP and control groups. Logistic regression analysis was used for extracting risk variables to develop first-episode IIP.

RESULTS

The sum of previous seizures was greater in the IIP than in control groups. This was particularly the case in the patients with partial epilepsies (PE). Higher seizure frequency in the patients with PE was associated with the development of first-episode IIP while no association was found in the whole cohort or in the patients with generalized epilepsies (GE). Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed the sum of previous seizures and family history of psychosis as risk variables to first-episode IIP.

CONCLUSIONS

The accumulation of seizure-related damages and family history of psychosis is associated with the onset of IIP episodes, particularly in the patients with PE. Seizure activity and individual vulnerability to psychosis are likely to be interacted for as the development of IIP in patients with epilepsy.

Cognitive function after status epilepticus versus after multiple generalized tonic-clonic seizures

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) is considered a risk for cognitive impairment. Studies have indicated that SE cause more cognitive decline than multiple lifetime generalized tonic clonic (GTC) seizures. The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients suffering from SE or from multiple lifetime GTC seizures have cognitive dysfunction, and if the disabilities differ between these groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients suffering from SE were evaluated shortly after the clinical post-ictal phase and again after one year. Their follow-up results were compared to results from patients with ≥10 GTC seizures and a group of control subjects. Tests from Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) were used. Motor Screening Test (MOT) assessed motor speed, Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS) and Paired Associates Learning (PAL) assessed memory, and Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) assessed executive function. Estimated premorbid IQ and radiologically visible brain lesions were controlled for in adjusted results. Outcome measures were z-scores, the number of standard deviations a score deviates from the mean of a norm population. Negative z-scores indicate poor performance.

RESULTS

After the clinical post-ictal phase, performances of SE patients were poor on all domains (n = 46). Mean z-scores with 95% confidence intervals were below zero for tests of psychomotor speed, executive thinking times and memory. Both SE patients at follow-up (n = 39) and patients with multiple GTC seizures (n = 24) performed poorer than controls (n = 20) on tests of memory. These group differences remained significant after covariate adjustments. SE patients at follow-up scored below patients with multiple GTC seizures on tests of psychomotor speed (mean difference -0.59, P = 0.020), but after adjusting for covariates this difference was no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not allow a firm conclusion as to whether SE is a more pronounced risk factor for cognitive dysfunction than repeated generalized tonic clonic seizures. In both patient groups, memory and learning dysfunction remained significant after adjusting for estimated premorbid IQ and structural brain lesions.

Hidden in plain sight: Non-convulsive status epilepticus-Recognition and management

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is an electroclinical state associated with an altered level of consciousness but lacking convulsive motor activity. It can present in a multitude of ways, but classification based on the clinical presentation and electroencephalographic appearances assists in determining prognosis and planning treatment. The aggressiveness of treatment should be based on the likely prognosis and the underlying cause of the NCSE.

Should Barbiturates be Used in Refractory Status Epilepticus?

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurologic emergency, one third of patients do not respond to treatment with benzodiazepines followed by a second antiepileptic drug. While initial treatment of complex partial SE is accordant to that of generalized convulsive SE, further management of refractory SE depends on the risk for acute complications and long-term clinical consequences. These risks are low in complex partial SE; therefore, in this clinical form anesthetics commonly are not used. Generalized convulsive SE-even in its early course-is a potentially life-threatening condition; therefore, prompt use of anesthetics is urgently required. Drugs of choice are barbiturates, midazolam, and propofol, all of which exhibit specific advantages and disadvantages. Up to now, data from clinical studies do not allow to prefer or to discard one of these anesthetics, therefore also barbiturates still should be used in refractory SE. A widely accepted in-house protocol for the management of initial and refractory SE is highly recommended.

Cognitive deterioration in adult epilepsy: Does accelerated cognitive ageing exist?

A long-standing concern has been whether epilepsy contributes to cognitive decline or so-called 'epileptic dementia'. Although global cognitive decline is generally reported in the context of chronic refractory epilepsy, it is largely unknown what percentage of patients is at risk for decline. This review is focused on the identification of risk factors and characterization of aberrant cognitive trajectories in epilepsy. Evidence is found that the cognitive trajectory of patients with epilepsy over time differs from processes of cognitive ageing in healthy people, especially in adulthood-onset epilepsy. Cognitive deterioration in these patients seems to develop in a 'second hit model' and occurs when epilepsy hits on a brain that is already vulnerable or vice versa when comorbid problems develop in a person with epilepsy. Processes of ageing may be accelerated due to loss of brain plasticity and cognitive reserve capacity for which we coin the term 'accelerated cognitive ageing'. We believe that the concept of accelerated cognitive ageing can be helpful in providing a framework understanding global cognitive deterioration in epilepsy.

Dissociative experiences in epilepsy: effects of epilepsy-related factors on pathological dissociation

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) in patients with epilepsy can be categorized as dissociative disorders. The prevalence of PNESs in patients with epilepsy appears to be much higher than that of dissociative experiences in nonclinical subjects. In order to clarify as to whether epilepsy-related factors were associated with pathological dissociation, we conducted a controlled study with 225 patients with epilepsy and 334 nonclinically matched individuals. All participants completed the Japanese version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). There was no significant difference in the DES score (DES-S) between the group with epilepsy and the control group. The group with epilepsy showed a significantly higher DES taxon (DES-T; a subset of DES-S and an index of pathological dissociation) than the control group. Thirty-one out of the 225 patients with epilepsy (13.8%) had PNESs. Because of its strong association with the DES-S and DES-T, PNESs can be regarded as a symptom of dissociation. With multiple regression analysis, the patients with a shorter duration of epilepsy, higher seizure frequency, or shorter period in education tend to suffer from pathological dissociation. These findings demonstrate that patients with epilepsy are more prone to experiencing pathological dissociation when having certain clinical factors.

Diagnostic yield of electroencephalography in the medical and surgical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

To determine the incidence of electrographic seizures during continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) in the medical and surgical ICU.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all adults who underwent cEEG in our medical and surgical ICU over a 4.5 year period. Patients with acute brain injury were excluded. Our primary outcome was cEEG documentation of an electrographic seizure, defined as a rhythmic discharge or spike and wave pattern demonstrating definite evolution and lasting at least 10 s. To assess inter-rater variability in cEEG interpretation, two electrophysiologists independently reviewed all available cEEGs of subjects with electrographic seizures documented on their clinical cEEG report and those of an equal number of randomly selected subjects from the remaining cohort.

RESULTS

Kappa analysis showed a value of 0.88, indicating excellent inter-rater agreement. Electrographic seizures were identified in 12 of 105 patients (11 %, 95 % CI 5-18 %). This rate did not change after excluding patients with a history of seizure, remote brain injury, or seizure-like events before cEEG. In an ordinal logistic regression model controlling for age, sex, and SOFA score, electrographic seizures were associated with lower odds of good outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge (OR 0.3, 95 % CI 0.1-0.8).

CONCLUSION

In a tertiary care medical and surgical ICU, electrographic seizures were seen on 11 % of cEEGs ordered for the evaluation of encephalopathy, and were associated with worse functional outcomes at discharge. Our findings confirm the results of a prior study suggesting a substantial burden of electrographic seizures in critically ill encephalopathic patients.

Effects of antipsychotic drugs on the duration of interictal psychotic episodes in patients with epilepsy

Treatment protocols for interictal psychosis (IIP) of patients with epilepsy have not yet been established. We aimed to clarify the effects of antipsychotic drugs (APDs) on duration of IIP episodes. We studied 393 IIP episodes in 200 patients with epilepsy in accordance with our empirical treatment protocol. The duration of all the episodes and APD treatments were reviewed. Antipsychotic drugs were used in 338 episodes and not used in 55 episodes (non-APD group). The APDs used in the treatment of IIP episodes were divided into the following three groups: first-generation APDs (FAPD, n=252), second-generation APDs (SAPD, n=44), and the combination of first- and second-generation APDs (CAPD, n=42). The non-APD group showed a significantly shorter episode duration than did the APD group (F=6.05, p=0.014). Among the 3 APD groups (FAPD, SAPD, and CAPD), there was a significant difference in duration of IIP episode (F=8.65, p=0.000). Whereas the duration of episodes was significantly longer in the CAPD group than in the other two groups, it was not significantly different between the FAPD and SAPD groups. Our findings further to clarify the nature of IIP and add further perspectives on treatment protocols for IIP.

Early developmental outcomes in children following convulsive status epilepticus: a longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common pediatric neurologic emergency and is often associated with unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes. The early developmental trajectory of children following CSE has not been previously investigated, leaving a gap in our understanding of how these adverse long-term outcomes emerge.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited children aged between 1 and 42 months from a predefined geographic region of North London who had at least one episode of CSE and classified them as prolonged febrile seizures (PFS) or nonfebrile CSE. Neuropsychological and imaging investigations were conducted within 6 weeks of CSE (baseline) and were repeated a year later (follow-up). Neurodevelopment was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III and compared to normally developing children. Predictors of neurodevelopmental scores at baseline and follow-up were investigated using regression analyses.

KEY FINDINGS

Of the 54 children that underwent investigations a mean of 38 days following CSE, 27 had PFS (mean age 18.4 months) and 27 had nonfebrile CSE (mean age 15.5 months). In addition, 17 healthy controls were assessed (mean age 20.49 months). Children with nonfebrile CSE had a worse developmental outcome than children with PFS (p < 0.002), despite there being no differences in seizure characteristics. In contrast to expectations, the PFS group had a worse developmental outcome than controls (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in performance from baseline to 1-year follow-up for the 70.4% of children who provided data. Seizure characteristics were not shown to be significant predictors of performance.

SIGNIFICANCE

CSE is associated with developmental impairments within 6 weeks of the acute event that continue to be present a year onward. This is also true of PFS cases that under-perform relative to controls despite mean scores within the clinically normal range. The absence of a change in performance from baseline to follow-up as well as the lack of a relationship between seizure characteristics and developmental outcomes supports the notion that premorbid abilities may be overshadowing any direct effects of CSE itself on outcome.

Cognitive outcome of status epilepticus in children

Epileptic encephalopathy encompasses conditions in which cognitive, motor, or sensory deficits result as a consequence of epileptic activity defining certain syndromes. It therefore represents a more severe subset of epilepsy, which can be generally characterized as frequent or severe seizures leading to cerebral dysfunction. This disturbance in cerebral functioning can in turn hinder, somewhat dramatically, cognitive development and further impact the future lives of patients. In this paper, we describe the cognitive consequences of status epilepticus in children and in adults in the context of plasticity theories. Recent studies maintain that consequences of SE may be severe cognitive sequelae, especially in early life. Since the residual consequences of SE in adulthood seem less detrimental and long-lasting, we argue that early life insults, such as those created by SE, during a rapid period of development and functional specialization, result in specific cognitive deficits dependent on the sensitive period at which SE occurred.

Status epilepticus: a review, with emphasis on refractory cases

Status epilepticus is among the most dramatic of clinical presentations encountered by emergency room physicians, neurologists, neurosurgeons and intensivists. While progress in its management has been aided significantly with an increasing number of effective treatment options, improved diagnostic methods and more effective monitoring, poor outcomes and diagnostic failures are still frequently encountered. Refractory cases still carry significant morbidity and mortality rates, including poor cognitive outcomes. This review discusses basic pathophysiology and management of status epilepticus, neuroimaging findings, the role of continuous electroencephalogram monitoring and nonconvulsive status epilepticusas well as recent developments in treatment options for refractory cases.

Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as status epilepticus that continues despite treatment with benzodiazepines and one antiepileptic drug. RSE should be treated promptly to prevent morbidity and mortality; however, scarce evidence is available to support the choice of specific treatments. Major independent outcome predictors are age (not modifiable) and cause (which should be actively targeted). Recent recommendations for adults suggest that the aggressiveness of treatment for RSE should be tailored to the clinical situation. To minimise intensive care unit-related complications, focal RSE without impairment of consciousness might initially be approached conservatively; conversely, early induction of pharmacological coma is advisable in generalised convulsive forms of the disorder. At this stage, midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are the most commonly used drugs. Several other treatments, such as additional anaesthetics, other antiepileptic or immunomodulatory compounds, or non-pharmacological approaches (eg, electroconvulsive treatment or hypothermia), have been used in protracted RSE. Treatment lasting weeks or months can sometimes result in a good outcome, as in selected patients after encephalitis or autoimmune disorders. Well designed prospective studies of RSE are urgently needed.

Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in tonic-clonic status epilepticus: a review

OBJECTIVES

to determine how the duration of SE, the EEG findings during/after SE, the depth of coma at presentation and age impact on the prognosis of convulsive status epilepticus indepedent of aetiology and to analyse the outcome of status epilepticus with respect to mortality and morbidity (the latter measured in terms of functional decline, cognitive/intellectual decline and the prospective risk of epilepsy).

DESIGN

a systematic review of all studies of status epilepticus (SE) with greater then 30 patients published from the 01/01/1990 up until 31/12/2009.

RESULTS

oveall the longer the duration of SE the worse the prognosis particularly after 1-2h of continuous seizures although this affect may be lost after 10h. The depth of coma correlates well with outcome. Only periodic epileptiform discharges (PEDs) have been shown to be associated with a poorer outcome in most (but not all) studies although this is probably related to the underlying aetiology. Age is an important prognostic factor with children having a better prognosis then adults.

CONCLUSIONS

age and depth of coma at presentation appear to be the strongest predictors of outcome of SE independent of aetiology with the duration of SE and the EEG findings less important.

Two forms of déjà vu experiences in patients with epilepsy

Persons with epilepsy experience déjà vu phenomena with or without seizure recognition. Déjà vu experiences are also common mental phenomena in nonclinical individuals. The purpose of this study was to clarify two forms of déjà vu experiences in persons with epilepsy. Déjà vu experiences of 312 patients with epilepsy and 402 nonclinical individuals were evaluated using the Inventory of Déjà vu Experiences Assessment. In the patients with epilepsy, characteristics of déjà vu experiences with seizure recognition (SR form) were compared with those experiences with no seizure recognition (NSR form). The incidence (63.1%) of déjà vu experiences in patients with epilepsy was significantly lower than that (76.1%) of nonclinical individuals (chi(2)=14.2, P=0.000). Among the patients with epilepsy, 55.6% had the NSR form and 24.0% had the SR form. Those with the NSR form manifested fewer psychopathological characteristics than did those with the SR form. Patients tended to view the SR form more negatively (i.e., frightened, uncomfortable, or disturbed) than the NSR form. The NSR form was significantly associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsies, less frequent antiepileptic drug administration, and no mesial temporal sclerosis. Although there was a significant association between the frequency of the SR form and patients' habitual seizures, the frequency of the NSR form was not associated with the frequency of the patients' habitual seizures. Persons with epilepsy experience two forms of déjà vu which are differently associated with their seizure recognition.

Status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most commonly occurring neurologic emergencies. About 40% of SE cases occur in people with epilepsy. Convulsive SE is easily recognized, but nonconvulsive SE is not and requires both a high index of suspicion and EEG confirmation. SE has a high mortality risk and requires rapid effective treatment for optimal response to therapy and outcome. The goal of treatment is to stop all clinical and electrographic seizures while maintaining vital functions. If seizures continue after initial treatment with a benzodiazepine, additional antiepileptic therapy should be administered. When SE is refractory to these treatments, continuous IV infusion with midazolam, propofol, or a barbiturate suppresses seizure activity. Standard treatment protocols are useful in promoting rapid intervention with appropriate medications.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a heterogeneous disorder with multiple subtypes. Although attempts have been made to define and classify this disorder, there is yet no universally accepted definition or classification that encompasses all subtypes or electroclinical scenarios. Developing such a classification scheme is becoming increasingly important, because NCSE is more common than previously thought, with a bimodal peak, in children and the elderly. Recent studies have also shown a high incidence of NCSE in the critically ill. Although strong epidemiological data are lacking, NCSE constitutes about 25-50% of all cases of status epilepticus. For the purposes of this review, we propose an etiological classification for NCSE including NCSE in metabolic disorders, NCSE in coma, NCSE in acute cerebral lesions, and NCSE in those with preexisting epilepsy with or without epileptic encephalopathy. NCSE is still underrecognized, yet potentially fatal if untreated. Diagnosis can be established using an electroencephalogram (EEG) in most cases, sometimes requiring continuous monitoring. However, in comatose patients, diagnosis can be difficult, and the EEG can show a variety of rhythmic or periodic patterns, some of which are of unclear significance. Although some subtypes of NCSE are easily treatable, such as absence status epilepticus, others do not respond well to treatment, and debate exists over how aggressively clinicians should treat NCSE. In particular, the appropriate treatment of NCSE in patients who are critically ill and/or comatose is not well established, and large-scale trials are needed. Overall, further work is needed to better define NCSE, to determine which EEG patterns represent NCSE, and to establish treatment paradigms for different subtypes of NCSE.

Cognitive outcome of status epilepticus in adults

There is no doubt that structural morphological brain lesions and malformations in epilepsy represent major etiological factors for the cognitive impairments seen in this disease. The role of epileptic activity and seizures for cognition and cognitive development, however, is less easily determined. Epileptic dysfunction ranges from interictal and periictal activity over self-terminating seizures to non-convulsive and convulsive status epilepticus, which appear the most severe conditions along this continuum. The decisive question in this regard is as to whether cognitive impairments observed in the acute epileptic condition are reversible or not. Impairments from interictal or postictal epileptic dysfunction are reversible and may interfere at most with brain maturation and cognitive development in the young patient. Seizures and ictal dysfunction in contrast, even when reversible, can leave a permanent trace which extends the phase of postictal recovery. As for status epilepticus and subsequent cognitive decline it often remains open whether the epileptic condition itself or the underlying clinical condition is causative for the aftermath. While there is evidence for both possibilities, group data from neuropsychological cross sectional and longitudinal studies indicate that more severe mental impairments, which in turn indicate more severe clinical conditions, appear to be a risk factor for sustaining status epilepticus, rather than that status epilepticus causes the cognitive decline. Reviewing the literature the cognitive condition in patients with status epilepticus varies with the type of epilepsy, the etiology of epilepsy, severity of the status, and the age of the patient.

Treatment of acute seizures and status epilepticus

Overt status epilepticus and persistent obtundation after a witnessed clinical seizure are neurologic emergencies. Early recognition and intervention in the electroclinical syndrome of status epilepticus reduces morbidity, although treatment of the underlying etiology is also critical. This review outlines key concepts related to status epilepticus, delineates an approach to the early management of status epilepticus, and highlights novel but practical approaches in the evaluation and treatment of refractory status epilepticus, emphasizing the use of a treatment algorithm. This review is written from the perspective of the intensive care unit clinician, and the approach and opinions expressed stem from clinical experience and review of the current literature. Particular attention is given to an overall approach to the management of convulsive status epilepticus in adults and older children as well as exploring novel approaches and diagnostic tools that may prove useful in difficult-to-control status epilepticus.

The epidemiology of convulsive status epilepticus in children: a critical review

There is ongoing debate regarding the most appropriate definition of status epilepticus. This depends upon the research question being asked. Based on the most widely used "30 min definition," the incidence of childhood convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in developed countries is approximately 20/100,000/year, but will vary depending, among others, on socioeconomic and ethnic characteristics of the population. Age is a main determinant of the epidemiology of CSE and, even within the pediatric population there are substantial differences between older and younger children in terms of incidence, etiology, and frequency of prior neurological abnormalities or prior seizures. Overall, incidence is highest during the first year of life, febrile CSE is the single most common cause, around 40% of children will have previous neurological abnormalities and less than 15% will have a prior history of epilepsy. Outcome is mainly a function of etiology. However, the causative role of CSE itself on mesial temporal sclerosis and subsequent epilepsy or the influence of age, duration, or treatment on outcome of CSE remains largely unknown. Future studies should aim at clarifying these issues and identifying specific ethnic, genetic, or socioeconomic factors associated with CSE to pinpoint potential targets for its primary and secondary prevention.

Nonconvulsive seizures: developing a rational approach to the diagnosis and management in the critically ill population

Originally described in patients with chronic epilepsy, nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) are being recognized with increasing frequency, both in ambulatory patients with cognitive change, and even more so in the critically ill. In fact, the majority of seizures that occur in the critically ill are nonconvulsive and can only be diagnosed with EEG monitoring. The semiology of NCSs and the associated EEG findings are quite variable. There are a number of periodic, rhythmic or stimulation-related EEG patterns in the critically ill of unclear significance and even less clear treatment implications. The field struggles to develop useful diagnostic criteria for NCSs, to standardize nomenclature for the numerous equivocal patterns, and to devise studies that will help determine which patterns should be treated and how aggressively. This review surveys the evidence for and against NCSs causing neuronal injury, and attempts to develop a rational approach to the diagnosis and management of these seizures, particularly in the encephalopathic population.

Non-convulsive status epilepticus in adults: clinical forms and treatment

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is one of the great diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of modern neurology. Because the clinical features of this disorder may be very discrete and sometimes hard to differentiate from normal behaviour, NCSE is usually overlooked and consequently not treated properly. It is important to be familiar with the clinical subtypes such as absence, simple and complex partial, and subtle status epilepticus because each requires tailored management. In order to improve overall care of patients with NCSE, strict diagnostic criteria are needed that should be based on clinical alterations and ictal electroencephalographic changes. NCSE should be terminated rapidly to prevent patients from serious injuries, particularly if consciousness is impaired.

Duration of postictal psychotic episodes

PURPOSE

To clarify duration of postictal psychosis (PIP) episodes and identify factors that influence its duration.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with epilepsy exhibited 151 PIP episodes during a mean follow-up period of 12.8 years. Distribution of the duration of these episodes was determined, and factors potentially affecting were analyzed. Factors analyzed included PIP-related variables (i.e., antecedent seizures and the lucid interval) and patient characteristics (i.e., type of epilepsy, lateralization of EEG abnormalities, and intellectual functioning).

RESULTS

The mean duration of the 58 first PIP episodes was 10.5 days, and that of all 151 PIP episodes (including multiple episodes) was 9.2 days. Approximately 95% of the PIP episodes resolved within 1 month. Most PIP-related variables, except for antipsychotic drugs administered, were not associated with duration of the episodes. Several patient characteristics, i.e., history of interictal psychosis, family history of psychosis, and intellectual functioning, were associated with duration of the PIP episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that most PIP episodes last less than 1 month. PIP episodes appear to be prolonged when individuals have an underlying vulnerability to psychosis. Clinical phenomena that can trigger PIP may not determine the course of the PIP episode.