Splanchnic vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplantation: usefulness of screening and anticoagulation

Etiology and Risk Factors for Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Non-Cirrhotic, Non-Neoplastic Patients: A Narrative Review

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting the portal, mesenteric, splenic, and hepatic veins. While frequently associated with liver cirrhosis and malignancy, SVT also occurs in non-cirrhotic, non-neoplastic patients. This narrative review evaluates the epidemiology and risk factors for SVT in this population. The prevalence and incidence of SVT in non-cirrhotic, non-neoplastic patients remain incompletely characterized, with estimates varying widely across studies. The clinical significance of SVT relates to potential complications, including intestinal ischemia, portal hypertension, and a possible underlying systemic disorder. Risk factors for SVT can be categorized into local abdominal conditions, thrombophilias, and systemic disorders. Local factors include inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, abdominal surgery, and trauma. Thrombophilias, both inherited and acquired, are significant contributors to SVT risk. Systemic conditions associated with SVT include autoimmune disorders, pregnancy, hematological diseases, and infections. The complex interplay of these risk factors highlights the need for a comprehensive evaluation of SVT patients. Early recognition and management of these conditions can prevent potentially life-threatening complications and guide decisions regarding anticoagulation and long-term follow-up.

Advancements of direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhotic individuals with portal vein thrombosis

Individuals with cirrhosis maintain a delicate balance between pro- and anticoagulation, which can lead to a state of hypercoagulability. This hypercoagulable condition not only exacerbates liver fibrosis but also increases the risk of venous thrombosis, particularly portal vein thrombosis (PVT). PVT has detrimental effects on liver function, complicates the success of liver transplantation, and negatively impacts the survival rate of patients with cirrhosis. Currently, multiple studies have confirmed that individuals with cirrhosis responded well to treatment with novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), showing both safety and efficacy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs as a preventive measure in patients with cirrhosis following surgery has been shown to lower the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis and postpone the progression of liver fibrosis.

Establish and validate an artificial neural networks model used for predicting portal vein thrombosis risk in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis patients

BACKGROUND

The portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can exacerbate portal hypertension and lead to complications, increasing the risk of mortality.

AIM

To evaluate the predictive capacity of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in quantifying the likelihood of developing PVT in individuals afflicted with hepatitis B-induced cirrhosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Ditan Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, including 986 hospitalized patients. Patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2014 were assigned to the training set (685 cases), while those hospitalized from January 2015 to December 2016 were divided into the validation cohort (301 cases). Independent risk factors for PVT were identified using COX univariate analysis and used to construct an ANN model. Model performance was evaluated through metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index.

RESULTS

In the training set, PVT occurred in 19.0% of patients within three years and 23.7% within five years. In the validation cohort, PVT developed in 16.7% of patients within three years and 24.0% within five years. The ANN model incorporated nine independent risk factors: Age, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal varices with bleeding, Child-Pugh classification, alanine aminotransferase levels, albumin levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet. The model achieved an AUC of 0.967 (95%CI: 0.960-0.974) at three years and 0.975 (95%CI: 0.955-0.992) at five years, significantly outperforming existing models such as model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh-Turcotte (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ANN model demonstrated effective stratification of patients into high- and low-risk groups for PVT development over three and five years. Validation in an independent cohort confirmed the model's predictive accuracy.

Early-Onset Seizures After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

After encephalopathy, epileptic seizures (ES) are the second most common neurologic complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and may announce a disabling/fatal neurologic disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we collected clinical information from patients who underwent OLT at our institution and analyzed outcomes and potential risk factors for developing ES after OLT.

RESULTS

Fourteen of our 376 patients (3.72%) who underwent OLT had ES. After excluding 2 patients with already known epilepsy, among the other 12 patients, 2 were diagnosed with nonanoxic cerebral edema, 2 with anoxic damage, 1 with intracranial hemorrhage, 1 with metabolic derangement, and 4 with neurotoxicity; 2 did not receive a diagnosis of certainty. 9 of 12 patients had structural abnormalities on neuroimaging exams. Patients with ES had lower body mass index, higher rate of pretransplant portal thrombosis, and lower pre-transplant plasma concentration of albumin than patients without ES. Multiple post-transplantation systemic complications, postoperative infections, and graft rejection were correlated with a significantly higher risk of ES. Compared with patients without seizures, patients with ES had longer in-hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, higher probability of ICU readmission, in-hospital death, and need for rehabilitation. Just 3 of the 12 patients with ES had a good prognosis, while the other 9 had at least mild neurologic sequelae, 5 of whom died because of the underlying neurologic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

ES after OLT may announce detrimental neurologic disease. When an underlying neurologic disease is excluded, prognosis in terms of seizure recurrence and long-term antiseizure medication need is warranted.

Experience With Dabigatran on Rate of Portal Vein Thrombosis Recanalization, Disease Progression and Survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We assessed clinical, procoagulant and genetic risk factors and clinical outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients with non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic PVT between January 2021 and January 2024 (aged ≥ 18 years) in those without/with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B/C ≤ 10) were started on dabigatran and followed and compared with those on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and untreated individuals.

RESULTS

Dabigatran was prescribed in 119 patients with PVT type 1 (61, 51.3%), type 2 (34, 28.6%), type 3 (24, 20.2%); 72 (60.5%) with cirrhosis [CP-A (27, 37.5%), CP-B (43, 59.7%) and CP-C10 (2, 2.8%)]. Procoagulant factors noted were JAK2V617F (10.1%), CALR (2.5%) and factor V Leiden (1.6%) mutations, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, 15.2%), isolated Protein C (14.3%) and Protein S (16.8%) deficiency.

COMPARATORS

28 patients who declined anticoagulation/were unable to come for follow-up, and six with CP-C received VKA. Overall recanalization rate (RR) on dabigatran was 56 (47.1%); 25 (21%) complete recanalization, 31 (26%) partial recanalization and 63 (52.9%) stable PVT over median follow-up of 32 months. Patients not anticoagulated had a spontaneous RR in 21.4% (28 patients; p = 0.005 compared with dabigatran group) and none recanalized on VKA. On multivariable analysis, predictors of recanalization on dabigatran were Factor VIII Antigen level (FVIII:Ag, HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.032), non-occlusive PVT (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9-5.6, p = 0.025) and acute PVT (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-3.2, p = 0.003). Mortality was 14 (11.8%).

CONCLUSION

On dabigatran, 47% of 119 patients achieved portal vein recanalization over 32 months of follow-up which was higher than the spontaneous RR (21.4%) in an untreated cohort. High Factor VIII:Ag was a predictor of non-recanalization. Dabigatran was safe in cirrhosis (CP-A and B) while further work is needed in CP-C.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis: management for the thrombosis specialist

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) is an uncommon site of venous thrombosis that is associated with complications including portal hypertension and hepatic dysfunction. The evaluation and management of this patient population has evolved in recent years, but there are limited data from clinical trials to guide management. Given the various acquired and biologic risk factors leading to the development of SpVT and the potential complications that can arise from it, input from a multidisciplinary team can be valuable in managing such patients, including thrombosis specialists or hematologists, gastroenterologists or hepatologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. In this article, we present 4 cases that highlight important issues and considerations in the evaluation of SpVT, including initial diagnostic approach in a patient with a new diagnosis of SpVT, considerations for anticoagulant therapy, management of SpVT in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, and the role of interventional vascular procedures in the management of SpVT. By reviewing the current literature, we address clinically relevant questions that are posed to clinicians managing patients with SpVT; we also point out gaps in our current knowledge that merit future investigation.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are common in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with advanced portal hypertension and mortality. The treatment of PVTs remains a clinical challenge due to limited evidence and competing risks of PVT-associated complications vs bleeding risk of anticoagulation. Significant heterogeneity in PVT phenotype based on anatomic, host, and disease characteristics, and an emerging spectrum of therapeutic options further complicate PVT management. This Clinical Practice Update (CPU) aims to provide best practice advice for the evaluation and management of PVT in cirrhosis, including the role of direct oral anticoagulants and endovascular interventions.

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Asymptomatic patients with compensated cirrhosis do not require routine screening for PVT. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Patients with cirrhosis with PVTs identified on Doppler ultrasound should undergo cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for malignancy, and document the degree of lumen occlusion, clot extent, and chronicity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT do not require a hypercoagulable workup in the absence of additional thromboemboli or laboratory abnormalities or family history suggestive of thrombophilia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT with evidence of intestinal ischemia require urgent anticoagulation to minimize ischemic injury. If available, these patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology and hepatology, interventional radiology, hematology, and surgery. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Consider observation, with repeat imaging every 3 months until clot regression, in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia and recent (<6 months) thrombosis involving the intrahepatic portal vein branches or when there is <50% occlusion of the main portal vein, splenic vein, or mesenteric veins. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia who develop recent (<6 months) PVT that is >50% occlusive or involves the main portal vein or mesenteric vessels. Patients who have increased benefit of recanalization include those with involvement of more than 1 vascular bed, those with thrombus progression, potential liver transplantation candidates, and those with inherited thrombophilia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Anticoagulation is not advised for patients with cirrhosis with chronic (>6 months) PVT with complete occlusion with collateralization (cavernous transformation). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT warrant endoscopic variceal screening if they are not already on nonselective beta-blocker therapy for bleeding prophylaxis. Avoid delays in the initiation of anticoagulation for PVT, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants are all reasonable anticoagulant options for patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Decision making should be individualized and informed by patient preference and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. Direct oral anticoagulants may be considered in patients with compensated Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhosis and offer convenience as their dosages are independent of international normalized ratio monitoring. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Patients with cirrhosis on anticoagulation for PVT should have cross-sectional imaging every 3 months to assess response to treatment. If clot regresses, anticoagulation should be continued until transplantation or at least clot resolution in nontransplantation patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected patients with cirrhosis and PVT who have additional indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transplantation candidates if recanalization can facilitate the technical feasibility of transplantation.

Activation of the Contact System and Intrinsic Pathway in Peripheral and Portal Venous Circulations in Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

 Portal vein system-specific risk factors contributing to portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis are poorly investigated.

AIM

 This study aimed to quantify contact system and intrinsic pathway activation in the peripheral compared to portal venous blood in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

 Adult patients with cirrhosis undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt underwent simultaneous blood sampling from a peripheral vein and the portal vein. Complexes of serine proteases with their respective inhibitors were measured by ELISA to quantify contact system (PKa:C1-INH [plasma kallikrein:C1-esterase inhibitor] and FXIIa:C1-INH) and intrinsic pathway activation (FXIa:C1-INH, FXIa:α1at [α-1 antitrypsin], FXIa:AT [antithrombin], and FIXa:AT).

RESULTS

 Twenty patients with cirrhosis (mean age 55 ± 7 years, M = 58%, Child-Pugh A/B/C 6/11/3) and 25 healthy controls (mean age 45 ± 12 years, M = 60%) were enrolled. The etiology of cirrhosis was primarily alcohol abuse, followed by chronic viral infection. Log-transformed peripheral levels of all the complexes were significantly higher in patients compared with controls. While levels of PKa:C1-INH, FXIIa:C1-INH, FXIa:C1-INH and FXIa:α1at were similar in peripheral and portal venous blood in cirrhotic patients, FXIa:AT and FIXa:AT levels were significantly higher in portal blood (p = 0.013 and 0.011, respectively). FXIa:C1-INH significantly correlated with both contact system complexes (FXIIa:C1-INH and PKa:C1-INH) and with FIX:AT.

CONCLUSION

 Markers of contact system and intrinsic pathway activation in the systemic circulation were significantly higher in cirrhosis versus controls. Complexes of FXIa and FIXa with AT were significantly higher in the portal than in peripheral plasma in cirrhosis, possibly indicating a unique heparin-like effect in portal venous blood.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the patients on the liver transplant list

Patients with cirrhosis-associated and portal hypertension-associated complications may benefit from TIPS and/or liver transplantation. In many patients, the decision of whether or not TIPS should be placed prior to liver transplantation is fairly clear-cut. Nevertheless, there are some patients in whom the decision can be more complex. On one hand, TIPS is easily available in contrast to liver transplantation, and patients with TIPS may have clinical improvement. On the other hand, although TIPS may improve the situation of the patient, this improvement may not be sufficient to significantly improve the quality of life. Furthermore, TIPS malposition may be challenging for liver transplantation surgery. This review approaches the advantages and disadvantages of TIPS placement in patients who are candidates for liver transplantation and proposes decision pathways for patients with complications of portal hypertension on the liver transplant waiting list.

The Molecular Mechanisms of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the sixth most diagnosed cancer worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The association of HCC and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) represents an advanced stage of the tumor. PVT has a prevalence of about 25-50% in HCC, determining poor prognosis and a remarkable reduction in therapeutic perspectives in these patients, leading to severe complications such as ascites, metastasis, an increase in portal hypertension and potentially fatal gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this review is to evaluate the molecular mechanisms that are at the basis of PVT development, trying to evaluate possible strategies in the early detection of patients at high risk of PVT.

Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.

Management of extensive portal vein thrombosis via thrombolysis and thrombectomy without underlying liver disease: A case report

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare condition, particularly in non-cirrhotic patients. Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of the treatment. Extensive PVT can lead to variceal bleeding, ascites, bowel ischemia, and hypersplenism. The role of thrombolysis and thrombectomy in these patients remains unclear. However, there is evidence that local thrombolysis and thrombectomy should be considered in those who remain symptomatic on anticoagulation and are at risk of complications with acute PVT.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinic, Diag-nosis, Impact on Prognosis

   Portal vein thrombosis is the most common thrombotic complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in cases of severe forms. The pathogenesis is multifactorial in nature, it determined by a change in the balance between the coagulation and anticoagulation systems. Thrombosis is often asymptomatic and is accidentally detected, although it can be complicated by varicose bleeding, intestinal ischemia, and portal biliopathy. Ultrasound Doppler examination is a screening method, as an alternative, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are used. The review highlights data on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. The data on the effect of portal vein thrombosis on the progression of liver cirrhosis and the survival of patients, including after liver transplantation, are presented.

Review article: Evaluation and care of the critically ill patient with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The increase in prevalence of liver disease globally will lead to a substantial incremental burden on intensive care requirements. While liver transplantation offers a potential life-saving intervention, not all patients are eligible due to limitations such as organ availability, resource constraints, ongoing sepsis or multiple organ failures. Consequently, the focus of critical care of patients with advanced and decompensated cirrhosis turns to liver-centric intensive care protocols, to mitigate the high mortality in such patients.

AIM

Provide an updated and comprehensive understanding of cirrhosis management in critical care, and which includes emergency care, secondary organ failure management (mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, haemodynamic support and intensive care nutrition), use of innovative liver support systems, infection control, liver transplantation and palliative and end-of life care.

METHODS

We conducted a structured bibliographic search on PubMed, sourcing articles published up to 31 March 2024, to cover topics addressed. We considered data from observational studies, recommendations of society guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, and incorporated our clinical expertise in liver critical care.

RESULTS

Critical care management of the patient with cirrhosis has evolved over time while mortality remains high despite aggressive management with liver transplantation serving as a crucial but not universally available resource.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of organ support therapies, intensive care protocols, nutrition, palliative care and end-of-life discussions and decisions are an integral part of critical care of the patient with cirrhosis. A multi-disciplinary approach towards critical care management is likely to yield better outcomes.

Statin use in cirrhosis and its association with incidence of portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Statin use has shown a reduction in hepatic decompensation and portal hypertension. Its association with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) incidence is unknown. We aim to compare the incidence of PVT in patients with and without statin use.

METHODS

We excluded patients with a history of hepatocellular cancer, liver transplants, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and intra-abdominal malignancies. Patients with cirrhosis were followed from their first hepatologist clinical encounter (January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021) for 180 days to determine PVT incidence. We tested the association of statin use with PVT using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2785 patients with cirrhosis (mean age:61.0 ± 12.3 years, 44.3% female, 63.8% White, mean MELD-Na score:11.7 ± 6.1, and statin use:23.1%). A total of 89 patients developed PVT during the follow-up, which was lower in patients with statin use as compared to no statin use (1.3% vs 3.8%, P = 0.001, unadjusted HR:0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.62, P = 0.001). After matching for demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic decompensation events, patients with statin use had a lower risk of developing PVT in 180-day follow-up as compared to those without statin use (HR:0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.55, P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that statin use was associated with lower PVT incidence in non-NASH (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.54, P = 0.002) and decompensated cirrhosis (HR: 0.12, 95% CI:0.03-0.53, P = 0.005) than no statin use.

CONCLUSION

PVT incidence was lower in decompensated cirrhosis patients with statin use than in those with no statin use. However, this finding needs to be further tested in randomized control trials.

Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 2 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common predisposing conditions for PVT are chronic liver diseases (cirrhosis), primary or secondary hepatobiliary malignancy, major infectious or inflammatory abdominal disease, or myeloproliferative disorders. Methods: PVT can be classified on the basis of the anatomical site, the degree of venous occlusion, and the timing and type of presentation. The main differential diagnosis of PVT, both acute and chronic, is malignant portal vein invasion, most frequently by hepatocarcinoma, or constriction (typically by pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma). Results: The management of PVT is based on anticoagulation and the treatment of predisposing conditions. The aim of anticoagulation in acute thrombosis is to prevent the extension of the clot and enable the recanalization of the vein to avoid the development of complications, such as intestinal infarction and portal hypertension. Conclusions: The treatment with anticoagulant therapy favors the reduction of portal hypertension, and this allows for a decrease in the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with esophageal varices. The anticoagulant treatment is generally recommended for at least three to six months. Prosecution of anticoagulation is advised until recanalization or lifelong if the patient has an underlying permanent pro-coagulant condition that cannot be corrected or if there is thrombosis extending to the mesenteric veins.

[Splanchnic vein thrombosis]

Splanchnic vein thrombosis includes Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These diseases share common features: (i) they are rare diseases and (ii) they can lead to portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, the most common being myeloproliferative neoplasms. A rapid and comprehensive workup for thrombosis risk factors is necessary in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis, and is associated with a worse course of cirrhosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are increasing. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a second-line procedure in this setting. Because of the rarity of these diseases, high-level evidence studies are rare. However, collaborative studies have provided a better understanding of their natural history and allowed to improve the management of these patients. This review focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, patients with portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, and patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis.

Comparative effectiveness of warfarin in cirrhotic patients with non-symptomatic portal vein thrombosis: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

The effectiveness and risks of anticoagulant therapy in cirrhotic patients with non-symptomatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remain unclear. We conducted a multicenter, Zelen-designed randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of warfarin in cirrhotic patients with non-symptomatic PVT during a one-year follow-up. In brief, 64 patients were 1:1 randomly divided into the anticoagulation group or the untreated group. The probability of recanalization was significantly higher in the anticoagulation group than those untreated in both ITT analysis (71.9% vs 34.4%, p = 0.004) and PP analysis (76.7% vs 32.4%, p < 0.001). Anticoagulation treatment was the independent predictor of recanalization (HR 2.776, 95%CI 1.307-5.893, p = 0.008). The risk of bleeding events and mortality were not significantly different. A significantly higher incidence of ascites aggravation was observed in the untreated group (3.3% vs 26.5%, p = 0.015). In conclusion, warfarin was proved to be an effective and safe as an anticoagulation therapy for treating non-symptomatic PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Detection of a Prethrombotic State in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Using a Clot Waveform Analysis

Background: Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently associated with thrombosis, it is also associated with liver cirrhosis (LC) which causes hemostatic abnormalities. Therefore, hemostatic abnormalities in patients with HCC were examined using a clot waveform analysis (CWA). Methods: Hemostatic abnormalities in 88 samples from HCC patients, 48 samples from LC patients and 153 samples from patients with chronic liver diseases (CH) were examined using a CWA-activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and small amount of tissue factor induced FIX activation (sTF/FIXa) assay. Results: There were no significant differences in the peak time on CWA-APTT among HCC, LC, and CH, and the peak heights of CWA-APTT were significantly higher in HCC and CH than in HVs and LC. The peak heights of the CWA-sTF/FIXa were significantly higher in HCC than in LC. The peak times of the CWA-APTT were significantly longer in stages B, C, and D than in stage A or cases of response. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the fibrin formation height (FFH) of the CWA-APTT and CWA-sTF/FIXa showed the highest diagnostic ability for HCC and LC, respectively. Thrombosis was observed in 13 HCC patients, and arterial thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis were frequently associated with HCC without LC and HCC with LC, respectively. In ROC, the peak time×peak height of the first derivative on the CWA-sTF/FIXa showed the highest diagnostic ability for thrombosis. Conclusion: The CWA-APTT and CWA-sTF/FIXa can increase the evaluability of HCC including the association with LC and thrombotic complications.

Anticoagulation against portal vein thrombosis reduces mortality and liver cirrhosis-related complications: A propensity score-matched study

AIM

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of liver cirrhosis. Although anticoagulation contributes to thrombus resolution and is considered the first-choice treatment, its impact on patients' prognosis is still controversial. This study aimed to clarify the benefit of anticoagulation on mortality, liver function, and the incidence of liver cirrhosis-related complications in cirrhotic PVT patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective review in which we included 78 eligible patients with PVT out of 439. After propensity score matching, 21 cirrhotic PVT patients were included in each one of the untreated control and anticoagulation groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival was significantly improved in the anticoagulation group compared with the control group (p = 0.041), along with PVT size reduction (53.3% vs. 108.2%, p = 0.009). At the time of CT follow-up, the anticoagulation group showed a lower ALBI score (p = 0.037) and its prevalence of massive ascites was significantly lower (p = 0.043) compared with the control group. The incidence of overt encephalopathy was also lower in the anticoagulation group (p = 0.041). The cumulative incidence of bleeding events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation improves the survival of patients with cirrhotic PVT. Preserved liver function and reduced risks of cirrhosis-related complications under the treatment may have contributed to a better prognosis. Given its efficacy and safety, anticoagulation is worth initiating in patients with PVT.

Interpretable machine learning models for predicting venous thromboembolism in the intensive care unit: an analysis based on data from 207 centers

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a severe complication in critically ill patients, often resulting in death and long-term disability and is one of the major contributors to the global burden of disease. This study aimed to construct an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting VTE in critically ill patients based on clinical features and laboratory indicators.

METHODS

Data for this study were extracted from the eICU Collaborative Research Database (version 2.0). A stepwise logistic regression model was used to select the predictors that were eventually included in the model. The random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and support vector machine algorithms were used to construct the model using fivefold cross-validation. The area under curve (AUC), accuracy, no information rate, balanced accuracy, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score were used to assess the model's performance. In addition, the DALEX package was used to improve the interpretability of the final model.

RESULTS

This study ultimately included 109,044 patients, of which 1647 (1.5%) had VTE during ICU hospitalization. Among the three models, the Random Forest model (AUC: 0.9378; Accuracy: 0.9958; Kappa: 0.8371; Precision: 0.9095; F1 score: 0.8393; Sensitivity: 0.7791; Specificity: 0.9989) performed the best.

CONCLUSION

ML models can be a reliable tool for predicting VTE in critically ill patients. Among all the models we had constructed, the random forest model was the most effective model that helps the user identify patients at high risk of VTE early so that early intervention can be implemented to reduce the burden of VTE on the patients.

Natural history of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Progression of liver disease in cirrhosis is associated with an increased incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis. However, evidence suggests that spontaneous recanalization of PVT may occur even without anti-thrombotic therapy. Thus, the present meta-analysis was conducted to study the natural history of PVT in cirrhosis, facilitating decisions regarding anticoagulation.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched from 2000 to August 2022 for studies reporting the outcome of PVT in cirrhotics without anticoagulation. The pooled proportions with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies (n = 1441) were included in the final analysis. Progression of PVT on follow-up was seen in 22.2% (95% CI 16.1-28.4), while 77.7% (95% CI 71.6-83.9) remained non-progressive (improved or stable). The most common outcome was a stable PVT with a pooled event rate of 44.6% (95% CI 34.4-54.7). The pooled rates of regression and complete recanalization of PVT in cirrhotics were 29.3% (95% CI 20.9-37.7) and 10.4% (95% CI 5.0-15.8), respectively. On follow-up after improvement, pooled recurrence rate of PVT was 24.0% (95% CI 14.7-33.4). MELD score, and presence of ascites had a negative association, while a longer follow-up duration had positive association with PVT regression.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 25% of the cases of PVT in cirrhosis are progressive, 30% cases improve, and 45% remain stable. Future studies are needed to analyze the predictors of spontaneous regression.

Standardizing liver imaging reporting and interpretation: LI-RADS and beyond

Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring of primary liver cancers. Clear, consistent, and actionable communication of imaging results is crucial to avoid miscommunication and potential detrimental impact on patient care. In this review, we discuss the importance, advantages, and potential impact of universal adoption of standardized terminology and interpretive criteria for liver imaging, from the point of view of radiologists and clinicians.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Portal vein thrombosis was considered a contraindication for liver transplantation. This study analyzes the perioperative complications and survival of liver transplant patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). A retrospective observational cohort study of liver transplant patients was conducted. The outcomes were early mortality (30 days) and patient survival. A total of 201 liver transplant patients were identified and 34 (17%) patients with PVT were found. The most frequent extension of thrombosis was Yerdel 1 (58.8%), and a portosystemic shunt was identified in 23 (68%) patients. Eleven patients (33%) presented any early vascular complication, PVT being the most frequent (12%). The multivariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between PVT and early complications (OR = 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.4-7.7; p = 0.006). Moreover, early mortality was observed in eight patients (24%), of which two (5.9%) presented Yerdel 2. For Yerdel 1, patient survival according to the extent of thrombosis was 75% at 1 year and 3 years, while for Yerdel 2, it was 65% at 1 year, and 50% at 3 years (p = 0.04). Portal vein thrombosis significantly influenced early vascular complications. Furthermore, portal vein thrombosis Yerdel 2 or higher impacts the survival of liver grafts in the short and long term.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A literature review

Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT), a common complication of advanced liver disease, is defined as an obstruction of the portal vein due to thrombus formation that can extend to the superior mesenteric and splenic veins. It was believed that PVT occurred predominantly due to prothrombotic potential. However, recent studies have shown that decreased blood flow related to portal hypertension appears to increase PVT risk as per Virchow's triad. It is well known that there is a higher incidence of PVTs in cirrhosis with a higher MELD and Child Pugh score. The controversy for management of PVTs in cirrhotics lies in the individualized assessment of risks versus benefits of anticoagulation, since these patients have a complex hemostatic profile with both bleeding and procoagulant propensities. In this review, we will systematically compile the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.

Management of splanchnic vein thrombosis

The expression splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These disorders have common characteristics: they are both rare diseases which can cause portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, among which myeloproliferative neoplasms represent the most common; a rapid comprehensive work-up for risk factors of thrombosis is needed in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis and in those with porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease. The presence and nature of underlying liver disease impacts the management of portal vein thrombosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are growing, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is now a second-line option. Due to the rarity of these diseases, studies yielding high-grade evidence are scarce. However, collaborative studies have provided new insight into the management of these patients. This article focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, or cirrhosis with non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: a multicenter real life cοhort study

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of cirrhosis and can be a cause or consequence of liver disease progression. It is unclear whether PVT treatment is affecting clinical outcomes in cirrhotics.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study of cirrhotics with PVT, initially retrospectively and thereafter prospectively registered in a data base. We studied the impact of PVT treatment on this population for efficacy, safety and the impact on survival. In survival analysis Mantel-Cox and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan tests were used. A P value of <0.05, was considered significant. For statistical computations the STATA 12.1 was used.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included (76% decompensated, median MELD score 12 and Child-Pugh score 7), 47% with concomitant HCC. Fifty-one patients with PVT were treated with Vitamin-K antagonists or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months after PVT diagnosis, or until death or transplantation. PV patency after 6 months was not statistically different between patients receiving or not anticoagulation (complete-partial recanalization 27.4% of treated vs. 20% of untreated, P=0.21). Median survival was statistically worse between patients treated with anticoagulation than those untreated (10 vs. 15 months, P=0.036). Less portal hypertensive bleeding and less decompensation rates were found in treated cirrhotics vs. untreated (45.8% vs. 54.2%, P=0.003 and 78% vs. 80.9%, P=0.78, respectively). Patients with HCC had worse survival when treated vs. untreated (P=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of cirrhotics with PVT, treatment was feasible with acceptable side effects, but without meaningful clinical benefits.

Cirrhosis Management in the Intensive Care Unit

Patients with cirrhosis frequently require admission to the intensive care unit as complications arise in the course of their disease. These admissions are associated with high short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Thus, understanding and characterizing complications and unique needs of patients with cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure helps providers identify appropriate level of care and evidence-based treatments. While there is no widely accepted critical care admission criteria for patients with cirrhosis, the presence of organ failure and primary or nosocomial infections are associated with particularly high in-hospital mortality. Optimal management of patients with cirrhosis in the critical care setting requires a system-based approach that acknowledges deviations from canonical pathophysiology. In this review, we discuss appropriate considerations and evidence-based practices for the general care of patients with cirrhosis and critical illness.

Long-term efficacy and safety of anticoagulant for cavernous transformation of the portal vein cirrhotic patient with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) in cirrhotic patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) was a relatively rare disease and had no consensus on the treatment. Our study aimed to explore the value of anticoagulation with warfarin treatment for CTPV cirrhotic patients with EHPVO.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2019, the clinical characteristics of cirrhotic patients who were diagnosed as CTPV with EHPVO were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were distributed into the anticoagulation group (n = 46) and control group (n = 38). The change of portal vein thrombosis, hepatic decompensation, survival and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of our patients was 51 months in the anticoagulation group and 44 months in the control group. The progress rate of the portal vein was higher in patients from the control groups (n = 12) than in patients from the anticoagulation group (n = 4, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference between the partial recanalization rate and stable rate between the two groups. Patients in anticoagulation group developed less hepatic decompensation than those in control group (13.0% vs 34.2%, p = 0.021). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients in the anticoagulation group had a better prognosis than patients in the control group (P < 0.022). There were no serious complications due to warfarin treatment.

CONCLUSION

For CTPV cirrhotic patients with EHPVO, anticoagulation with warfarin treatment was effective and safe. Anticoagulants could prevent portal vein thrombosis progression, hepatic decompensation and death. In addition, our results showed little benefit of anticoagulants on thrombosis recanalization.

Review article: the safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis were long thought to be coagulopathic. However, this paradigm has changed in recent years and currently, cirrhosis is recognised as a prothrombotic state. Due to the increasing incidence of cirrhosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis which is closely associated with cardiac disease, patients with cirrhosis increasingly require therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. However, their potential for causing catastrophic and life-threatening bleeding in patients with cirrhosis leads to hesitancy about their use in patients with cirrhosis. Overall, traditional anticoagulation is safe for all Child-Pugh classes while newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mostly safe in Child-Pugh class A/B and contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For different indications, published data to date suggest that anticoagulation is overall safe for patients with cirrhosis who have venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and portal vein thrombosis, and does not increase the risk of variceal bleeding. Moreover, DOACs appear to have similar safety profiles as traditional anticoagulants. Finally, most studies suggest that antiplatelet agents are also safe to use in patients with cirrhosis although they are mostly contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, severe thrombocytopaenia presents a relative contraindication to their use. More prospective trials and large cohort studies are needed to advance our understanding of the safety and nuances of DOACs and antiplatelet agents in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Impact of Asymptomatic Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis on the Outcomes of Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

 The impact of asymptomatic superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis on the outcomes of cirrhotic patients remains uncertain.

METHODS

 Nonmalignant cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted between December 2014 and September 2021 and underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans were screened. Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) was identified. Death and hepatic decompensation were the outcomes of interest. Nelson-Aalen cumulative risk curve analysis and competing risk regression analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of asymptomatic SMV thrombosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) on the outcomes.

RESULTS

 Overall, 475 patients were included, of whom 67 (14.1%) had asymptomatic SMV thrombosis, 95 (20%) had PVT, and 344 (72.4%) did not have any PVST. Nelson-Aalen cumulative risk curve analyses showed that the cumulative incidences of death (p = 0.653) and hepatic decompensation (p = 0.630) were not significantly different between patients with asymptomatic SMV thrombosis and those without PVST, but the cumulative incidences of death (p = 0.021) and hepatic decompensation (p = 0.004) were significantly higher in patients with PVT than those without PVST. Competing risk regression analyses demonstrated that asymptomatic SMV thrombosis was not a significant risk factor for death (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 0.89, p = 0.65) or hepatic decompensation (sHR = 1.09, p = 0.63), but PVT was a significant risk factor for death (sHR = 1.56, p = 0.02) and hepatic decompensation (sHR = 1.50, p = 0.006). These statistical results remained in competing risk regression analyses after adjusting for age, sex, and Child-Pugh score.

CONCLUSION

 Asymptomatic SMV thrombosis may not influence the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. The timing of intervention for asymptomatic SMV thrombosis in liver cirrhosis should be further explored.

Rational hemostatic management in cirrhosis: from old paradigms to new clinical challenges

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cirrhosis are at risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Traditional hemostatic tests are inadequate to assess the complex and fragile balance of hemostasis in this setting, especially in advanced stages of disease such as decompensated cirrhosis or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of pro-hemostatic agents for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes is still debated and often contraindicated. Alongside, splanchnic, and peripheral thrombotic events are frequent in this population and require management that involves a careful balance between risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to address the state of the art on the clinical management of the hemostatic balance of cirrhosis in terms of established knowledge and future challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

The old paradigm of cirrhosis as a naturally anticoagulated condition has been challenged by more sophisticated global tests of hemostasis. Integrating this information in the clinical decision-making is still challenging for physicians and experts in hemostasis.

Gastrointestinal System: COVID-19 and Potential Mechanisms Associated with Coagulopathy

SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus that expanded worldwide, generating a pandemic of acute respiratory syndrome called "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19), which resulted in a global health crisis. The spectrum of COVID-19 manifestations ranges from none or mild symptoms to severe respiratory failure associated with systemic manifestations, mostly gastrointestinal symptoms. Hypercoagulability is an important feature of COVID-19 disease, which can potentially influence patients' prognosis. Therefore, gastroenterologists should focus on subjects with concomitant hypercoagulable gastrointestinal disorders as they may display a higher risk of thrombotic complications during SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence regarding the interplay of the prothrombotic pathogenetic mechanisms of both COVID-19 and hypercoagulable digestive diseases and the possible clinical implications. We summarized the potential interplay of prothrombotic mechanisms of both COVID-19 and hypercoagulable digestive diseases in the graphical abstract.

Clinical and imaging predictors of the natural course of bland portal vein thrombus in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombus (PVT) in cirrhotic patients is associated with worsening portal hypertension, leads to increased complexity of necessary interventions such as transjugular liver portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation, and is associated with worse outcomes after liver transplantation. Additionally, there are no established consensus guidelines for management of bland PVT in cirrhotic patients, which currently exists on a spectrum and is patient and provider dependent.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether there are associations between key clinical and imaging variables and bland PVT burden over time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This exploratory, retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent two or more multiphase CT or MRI examinations between 1/1/2013 and 12/31/2019 and had a diagnosis of PVT. Three readers independently evaluated all index and follow-up examinations for PVT burden using a proposed 8-point scale and the established Yerdel score. Key clinical factors were collected from the electronic medical record. The PVT burden over time and the association of this burden with key clinical and imaging variables were assessed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

138 patients with cirrhosis and bland PVT were included in the analyses. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range 55-67; 90 men) and median follow-up time was 19.6 months. At baseline, the mean score was 2.31 (± 1.44) and at the final follow-up examination, the mean score was 2.52 (± 1.99). Baseline occlusion level was the only statistically significant association with worsening PVT burden in all four vascular territories (p-value < 0.0001). Anticoagulation status did not have a statistically significant association with change in thrombus burden in any vascular territory or cumulative thrombus burden across all territories (p-value 0.11-0.43).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study shows that in cirrhotic patients with bland PVT, the thrombus burden did not change significantly over time and baseline thrombus burden is the only clinical factor significantly associated with increasing burden over time.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Cirrhosis: A Comprehensive Review

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Portal Interventions in the Setting of Venous Thrombosis or Occlusion

Portal vein thrombosis most commonly occurs as a complication of liver cirrhosis and can result in worsening symptoms of portal hypertension, which often can be challenging to treat with conventional decompression therapies. In addition, because complete portal vein thrombosis is associated with higher posttransplant morbidity and mortality, it is regarded as a relative contraindication to liver transplant. Often, the diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis is incidental; hence, imaging remains the mainstay for diagnosing this complication and is used to guide subsequent treatment. Although anticoagulation is the initial approach used to treat acute portal vein thrombosis, endovascular and/or surgical interventions may be necessary when there is concern for impending bowel ischemia. Treatment of chronic portal vein thrombosis is primarily aimed at alleviating the symptoms of portal hypertension and improving the chance of candidacy for liver transplant. Awareness of the portal venous anatomy to differentiate it from the periportal collaterals is key during recanalization of a chronically occluded portal vein. The authors provide an overview of the pathophysiology, acute and chronic imaging findings, and management of portal vein thrombosis, with a specific focus on endovascular management, as well as a summary of the current related literature. An invited commentary by Lopera and Yamaguchi is available online. ©RSNA, 2022.

What is the optimal management of thromboprophylaxis after liver transplantation regarding prevention of bleeding, hepatic artery, or portal vein thrombosis? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

A key tenet of clinical management of patients post liver transplantation (LT) is the prevention of thrombotic and bleeding complications. This systematic review investigated the optimal management of thromboprophylaxis after LT regarding portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and prevention of bleeding.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Seven databases were used to conduct extensive literature searches focusing on the use of anticoagulation in LT and its impact on the following outcomes: PVT, HAT, and bleeding (CRD42021244288).

RESULTS

Of the 2478 articles/abstracts screened, 16 studies were included in the final review. All articles were critically appraised by a panel of independent reviewers. There was wide variation regarding the anticoagulation protocols used. Thromboprophylaxis with therapeutic doses of heparin/Vitamin K antagonist combination did not decrease the risk of de novo or the recurrence of PVT but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding in some studies. Only the use of aspirin resulted in a small but significant decrease in the incidence of HAT post-LT, yet it did not increase the risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on existing data and expert opinion, thromboprophylaxis at therapeutic or prophylactic dose is not recommended for prevention of de novo PVT following LT in patients not at high risk. Aspirin should be considered as the standard of care following LT to prevent HAT. Thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in recipients at risk of HAT and PVT following LT.

Platelet-derived TGF-β1 is related to portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis by promoting hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication of cirrhosis accompanied by unclear pathogenesis. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) has been implicated in atherosclerosis and venous thrombosis whereas study regarding its part in PVT is lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the role of cytokine TGF-β1 in PVT and the potential mechanism.

Materials and methods

We included patients with cirrhotic gastroesophageal varices and divided them into two groups according to the presence of PVT. Serum levels of TGF-β1 were detected using Cytometric Bead Array kit and compared between two groups. Coagulation status was assessed using thromboelastography (TEG). Primary liver sinusoidal endothelial cells were treated with TGF-β1 and evaluated for endothelial dysfunction by RT-PCR.

Results

Our results uncovered that TGF-β1 (6,866.55 vs. 3,840.60 pg/ml, P = 0.015) significantly increased in the PVT group. Splenectomy might promote PVT by increasing platelet-derived TGF-β1 levels. Other cytokines showed no difference between PVT and non-PVT groups. Besides, TGF-β1 was correlated with platelet, fibrinogen, TEG-CI, TEG-MA, and TEG-α (coef = 0.733, 0.494, 0.604, 0.608, and 0.511; P &lt; 0.001, 0.027, 0.004, 0.004, and 0.021, respectively), which indicated a hypercoagulable state in PVT patients. RT-PCR of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells showed a markable increment of von Willebrand Factor (vWF), thrombomodulin(TM), intercellular adhesion moleclar-1(ICAM-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) after TGF-β1 treatment, suggesting the involvement of endothelial dysfunction.

Conclusion

Elevated platelet-derived TGF-β1 exhibited association with hypercoagulability and promoting effect on endothelial dysfunction, closely related with PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Significance of altered anticoagulant proteins and D-dimer in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: relation to the degree of liver dysfunction

Aim of the study

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-known consequence of cirrhosis. Its pathophysiology is complex, with possible downstream hepatic decompensation. This study was conducted to describe the changes of protein C (PC), protein S (PS) and D-dimer blood levels associated with PVT formation in cirrhosis and the relation to the degree of liver dysfunction.

Material and methods

This was a case-control study that included 50 cirrhotic patients who presented with acute de novo non-malignant PVT and 50 cirrhotic patients without PVT as a control group. The severity of liver disease was classified as per the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. Doppler ultrasonography identified acute portal vein occlusion, and dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography confirmed the extent and nature of PVT. Blood PC, PS and D-dimer levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

PC and PS levels were significantly lower, and the D-dimer level was significantly higher, in cirrhotic patients with PVT compared to the control group. PC and PS levels were significantly decreased in patients with higher CTP score of both groups. The D-dimer level did not vary significantly with the degree of liver dysfunction in patients of either group. PC, PS and D-dimer at the cut-off points of ≤ 77 IU/dl, ≤ 63 IU/dl, and > 300 ng/ml, respectively, significantly suggested PVT occurrence.

Conclusions

Alteration of the anticoagulant proteins and D-dimer contributed to PVT formation in cirrhotic patients and could help stratify the degree of liver dysfunction. Blood level of these hemostatic proteins could be incorporated into a probability score for early diagnosis and treatment of PVT in cirrhosis.

Transsplenic Portal System Catheterization: Review of Current Indications and Techniques

Multiple diseases of the portal system require effective portal vein access for endovascular management. While percutaneous transhepatic and transjugular approaches remain the standard methods of portal vein access, transsplenic access (TSA) has gained recognition as an effective and safe technique to access the portal system in patients with contraindications to traditional approaches. Recently, the utility of percutaneous TSA has grown, with described treatments including recanalization of chronic portal vein occlusion, placement of stents for portal vein stenosis, portal vein embolization of the liver, embolization of gastric varices, placement of complicated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and interventions after liver transplant. The authors provide a review of percutaneous TSA, including indications, a summary of related portal vein diseases, and the different techniques used for access and closure. In addition, an imaging-based review of technical considerations of TSA interventions is presented, with a review of potential procedural complications. With technical success rates that mirror or rival the standard methods and reported low rates of major complications, TSA can be a safe and effective option in clinical scenarios where traditional approaches are not feasible. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Risk factors for portal vein thrombosis or venous thromboembolism in a large cohort of hospitalized cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are fearsome complications of liver cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and the main risk factors for venous thrombotic complications in hospitalized cirrhotic patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed electronic administrative discharge data of 19461 cirrhotic patients hospitalized over a 35-year period; univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to asses risk factors for PVT or VTE and their impact on hospital stay and mortality.

RESULTS

382 out of 7445 patients (5.1%) were diagnosed with PVT and 95 (1.3%) with VTE. Liver cirrhosis complications were observed in 45% of patients. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (OR 13.88 [10.76-17.98] p < 0.0001), endoscopic signs of portal hypertension (OR 1.33 [1.02-1.75] p = 0.02), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (OR 4.59 [3.6-5.84] p < 0.0001), diabetes (OR 1.68 [1.27-2.22] p = 0.0001), abdominal surgery/invasive procedures (OR 2.03 [1.56-2.64] p < 0.0001) emerged as independent predictors of PVT. Higher risk of VTE was observed in patients with HE (OR 3.21 [1.78-5.79] p < 0.0001), HCC (OR 1.98 [1.23-3.19] p = 0.002) or other tumors (OR 2.48 [1.42-4.32] p = 0.001), acute illnesses (infections OR 3.01 [1.84-5.05] p = 0.0001; cardiac/respiratory insufficiency OR 2.4 [1.27-4.53] p = 0.003; acute myocardial infarction/stroke OR 7.86 [1.76-35.12] p = 0.003). VTE was the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 4.45 [1.05-18.81] p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver disease complications related to portal hypertension, HCC or other tumors, diabetes, acute illnesses (i.e. infections, cardiac/pulmonary insufficiency, acute myocardial infarction/stroke) and abdominal interventions are associated with increased risk of PVT or VTE in hospitalized cirrhotic patients, and should be considered to define personalized preemptive approaches.

Evaluation of liver transplant candidates with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is anticipated to become the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States in the near future. LT is indicated in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis who have medically refractory hepatic decompensation, synthetic dysfunction, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting certain criteria. The objective of LT evaluation is to determine which patient will derive the most benefit from LT with the least risk, thus maximizing the societal benefits of a limited resource. LT evaluation is a multidisciplinary undertaking involving several specialists, assessment tools, and diagnostic testing. Although the steps involved in LT evaluation are relatively similar across different liver diseases, patients with NASH-related cirrhosis have unique demographic and clinical features that affect transplant outcomes and influence their LT evaluation. LT candidates with NASH should be assessed for metabolic syndrome and obesity, malnutrition and sarcopenia, frailty, and cardiovascular disease. Interventions that treat cardiometabolic co-morbidities and improve patients' nutrition and functionality should be considered in order to improve patient outcomes in the waitlist and after LT.

Consensus Statement on Hemostatic Management, Anticoagulation, and Antiplatelet Therapy in Liver Transplantation

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies are increasingly used in liver transplant (LT) candidates and recipients due to cardiovascular comorbidities, portal vein thrombosis, or to manage posttransplant complications. The implementation of the new direct-acting oral anticoagulants and the recently developed antiplatelet drugs is a great challenge for transplant teams worldwide, as their activity must be monitored and their complications managed, in the absence of robust scientific evidence. In this changing and clinically heterogeneous scenario, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis aimed to achieve consensus regarding the indications, drugs, dosing, and timing of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies initiated from the inclusion of the patient on the waiting list to post-LT surveillance. A multidisciplinary group of experts composed by transplant hepatologists, surgeons, hematologists, transplant-specialized anesthesiologists, and intensivists performed a comprehensive review of the literature and identified 21 clinically relevant questions using the patient-intervention-comparison-outcome format. A preliminary list of recommendations was drafted and further validated using a modified Delphi approach by a panel of 24 transplant delegates, each representing a LT institution in Spain. The present consensus statement contains the key recommendations together with the core supporting scientific evidence, which will provide guidance for improved and more homogeneous clinical decision making.

Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses.