Provider Contributions to Disparities in Mental Health Care

Comparing In-Person, Telephonic, and Video-Based Treatment of Depression in Adult Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift toward virtual modalities for the treatment of depression in primary care.

METHODS

Participants were adults 18 years and older with a new episode of depression diagnosed in primary care between March 1, 2020, and May 21, 2021, and moderate-to-severe symptoms of depression at the time of diagnosis (N = 9619). Outcomes were 1) antidepressant medications prescribed and dispensed (referred to as received), as well as adherence to those medications; 2) referrals made to depression-related services and the receipt of those services; and 3) a follow-up visit completed with the diagnosing practitioner regardless of treatment actions.

RESULTS

Patients were 42.4 ± 17.8 years old, and 77.6% had moderate-to-severe symptoms at diagnosis. Most patients were women (70.4%), 48.2% were Hispanic, and 8.4% were Black. Telephone visits were associated with 64% increased odds of having an antidepressant prescribed when compared to in-person visits. However, patients prescribed an antidepressant during a telephone visit were 52% less likely to receive this prescription when compared to patients who were prescribed an antidepressant during an in-person visit. Telephone and video visits were associated with 48% and 37% decreased odds, respectively, of having a follow-up visit with the prescribing practitioner when compared to an in-person visit.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine for depression in adult primary care may result in greater antidepressant prescribing than in-person care, but these medications are less likely to be received. This study's findings suggest that health systems should adjust electronic decision support tools (such as mail-order pharmacies) to ensure virtual care decisions are implemented.

Cultural Conversations in Therapy: How Often Clients Talk About Their Identities

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine how often clients report discussing cultural identities during counseling sessions; the extent to which discussion of cultural identities during treatment varies across therapists; whether identifying as BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) predicts clients' discussion of cultural identities in sessions; and whether differences in the frequency of cultural conversations (i.e., dialogue that focuses on client cultural identities) across client groups depend on the therapist.

METHODS

This study examined variation in reports of engagement in cultural conversations during sessions (N=10,731) with 1,997 clients and 72 therapists from a university counseling center. Data were analyzed by using Bayesian multilevel models.

RESULTS

Overall, clients reported having cultural conversations in 48.4% of sessions. Cultural conversations were much more likely to occur in sessions with BIPOC clients than with White clients: 66.2% of sessions with BIPOC clients involved conversations about cultural identities, compared with only 39.8% of sessions with White clients. Of note, the magnitude of this difference varied by therapist.

CONCLUSION

Cultural conversations were more likely to occur in treatment with BIPOC clients than with White clients, and the presence of cultural conversations in treatment varied by therapist.

Leveraging Measurement-Based Care to Reduce Mental Health Treatment Disparities for Populations of Color

Disparities in mental health treatment have consistently been documented for clients of color as compared to White clients. Most mental health care disparities literature focuses on access to care at the point of initial engagement to treatment, resulting in a dearth of viable solutions being explored to retain clients in care once they begin. Measurement-based care (MBC) is a person-centered practice that has been shown to improve the therapeutic relationship, make treatment more personalized, and empower the client to have an active role in their care. Problems with therapeutic alliance and treatment relevance are associated with early termination for communities of color in mental health services. However, MBC has not been explored as a clinical practice to address therapeutic alliance and continual engagement for people of color seeking mental health care. This Point of View describes several MBC features that may be able to impact current sources of disparity in mental health treatment quality and provides a rationale for each. Our hope is that the field of MBC and progress feedback will more explicitly consider the potential of MBC practices to promote equity and parity in mental health services of color and will start to explore these associations empirically. We also discuss whether MBC should be culturally adapted to optimize its relevance and effectiveness for communities of color and other groups experiencing marginalization. We propose that MBC has promise to promote equitable mental health service quality and outcomes for communities of color.

Antiracist Practice in Psychiatry: Principles and Recommendations

The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified mental health disparities among people of color, particularly for Black, Latinx, and American Indian populations. In addition to experiencing overt hostility and systemic injustice, people from marginalized racial-ethnic groups experience prejudice and bias from clinicians that has disrupted rapport and trust in mental health systems; these experiences, in turn, have deepened these health disparities. In this article, the authors describe factors that have served to perpetuate mental health disparities and outline key components of antiracist practice in psychiatry (and in mental health practice, more generally). With lessons learned in recent years, this article presents practical ways to incorporate antiracist practices into clinical care.

Telephone-based depression self-management in Hispanic adults with epilepsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Depression is associated with adverse outcomes in epilepsy but is undertreated in this population. Project UPLIFT, a telephone-based depression self-management program, was developed for adults with epilepsy and has been shown to reduce depressive symptoms in English-speaking patients. There remains an unmet need for accessible mental health programs for Hispanic adults with epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects on depressive symptoms of a culturally adapted version of UPLIFT for the Hispanic community. Hispanic patients with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 72) were enrolled from epilepsy clinics in New York City and randomized to UPLIFT or usual care. UPLIFT was delivered in English or Spanish to small groups in eight weekly telephone sessions. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and adherence rates and acceptability was assessed by self-reported satisfaction with the intervention. Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores) were compared between study arms over 12 months. The mean age was 43.3±11.3, 71% of participants were female and 67% were primary Spanish speakers. Recruitment (76% consent rate) and retention rates (86–93%) were high. UPLIFT participants completed a median of six out of eight sessions and satisfaction ratings were high, but rates of long-term practice were low. Rates of clinically significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥5) were lower in UPLIFT versus usual care throughout follow-up (63% vs. 72%, 8 weeks; 40% vs. 70%, 6 months; 47% vs. 70%, 12 months). Multivariable-adjusted regressions demonstrated statistically significant differences at 6 months (OR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06–0.93), which were slightly reduced at 12 months (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.08–1.16). Results suggest that UPLIFT is feasible and acceptable among Hispanic adults with epilepsy and demonstrate promising effects on depressive symptoms. Larger trials in geographically diverse samples are warranted.