Comparison of Limited-Undermining Lipoabdominoplasty and Traditional Abdominoplasty Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging

Analysis of factors affecting the postoperative drainage in patients with abdominoplasty with circumferential liposuction

Background

Abdominoplasty combined with circumferential liposuction serves as a reliable and indispensable method for aesthetic body contour. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence drainage volume and duration after the procedure.

Methods

A retrospective study of 89 patients who received abdominoplasty with circumferential liposuction between January 2021 and October 2024 was conducted. Total drainage volume and duration were recorded. Univariable and multivariable linear regression and correlation analyses were utilized to identify the correlation between postoperative drainage and patient-related, and operation-related variables.

Results

The mean total drainage volume was 420.6 ± 220.8 ml, and the mean drainage duration was 6.8 ± 1.9 days. Based on the univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis, several statistically significant associations were identified. BMI (p = 0.001), volume of lipoaspirate (p = 0.001), and weight of resected tissue (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the drainage volume. BMI (p < 0.001), operation time (p < 0.001), volume of lipoaspirate (p < 0.001), and weight of resected tissue (p = 0.01) were risk factors influencing drainage duration.

Conclusions

BMI, volume of lipoaspirate, and weight of resected tissue were associated with drainage volume and duration. Operation time was an independent factor influencing drainage duration.

Redefining Abdominal Contours: An Analysis of Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty

INTRODUCTION

This study elucidates the application of Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty, a novel technique for achieving well-defined abdominal contours. The technique focuses on revealing the patient's inherent muscular volume and form by creating thinner flaps compared to traditional liposuction methodologies.

METHODS

Objective evaluations of the abdominal wall's configuration were systematically executed both pre- and post-intervention for each participant. Digital image measurements facilitated by an image software constituted the basis for these assessments. The Body Fat Index was computed using precise measurements from seven distinct anatomical sites, with two measurements taken at each site and subsequently averaged.

RESULTS

Over a span of 63 months, 300 patients underwent this combined procedure, resulting in discernible enhancements in the configuration of their abdominal walls in 97.6% of cases. However, complications such as partial diminution of tension in the muscular wall (2%), distal flap necrosis (0.6%), and minor muscular hernia (0.3%) were observed.

CONCLUSION

The employment of combined muscle plication emerges as an efficacious methodology in meticulously rectifying alterations inherent within the muscular aponeurotic abdominal wall. This technique ensures the preservation of the original anatomical structure and functional dynamics, thereby circumventing the manifestation of local distortions that may arise from inadequate or excessive corrections.

BULLET POINTS

The study introduces a novel technique, Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty, for achieving well-defined abdominal contours. This technique focuses on revealing the patient's inherent muscular volume and form by creating thinner flaps compared to traditional liposuction methodologies. Objective evaluations of the abdominal wall's configuration were systematically executed both pre- and post-intervention for each participant. The Body Fat Index was computed using precise measurements from seven distinct anatomical sites. Over a span of 63 months, 300 patients underwent this combined procedure, resulting in discernible enhancements in the configuration of their abdominal walls in 97.6% of cases. This technique ensures the preservation of the original anatomical structure and functional dynamics, thereby circumventing the manifestation of local distortions that may arise from inadequate or excessive corrections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Use of Infrared Thermography for Abdominoplasty Procedures in Patients with Extensive Subcostal Scars: A Preliminary Analysis

Subcostal scars may increase the risk of healing complications in abdominoplasty. The authors evaluated the use of thermography as a potential tool for patient selection and surgery planning to avoid complications and improve abdominoplasty outcomes. Two candidates for abdominoplasty procedures who presented with extensive subcostal scars were submitted to an infrared thermography protocol at all phases of the procedure: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative at 1 and 6 months. The preoperative thermography for both patients revealed near-normal abdominal wall perfusion. The thermograms captured intraoperatively during flap elevation did not show perfusion deficits on the upper abdominal flap. At 1 month and 6 months postoperative, dynamic thermography for both patients showed normal to near-normal perfusion. The procedures had a complication-free course with a good aesthetic result. Plastic surgeons may be reluctant to perform a full abdominoplasty in patients with a previous subcostal incision. In this preliminary analysis, we raise the potential usefulness of thermography for patients with recent subcostal scars and/or important comorbidities as a strategy for adequate patient and technique selection, avoiding possible complications. Future studies, with an increased number of patients and adequate statistical analysis, may allow us to validate the utility of thermography in these cases and reassure that the presence of previous extensive subcostal scars may not be a contraindication for a full abdominoplasty, especially if they are not recent.

Clinical Evaluation of 310 Abdominoplasties and Measurement of Scar Level

BACKGROUND

Most published studies on abdominoplasty focus on methods to reduce the risk of seromas. These methods include limited dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), quilting sutures, and preservation of the Scarpa fascia. Quantitative evaluation of the aesthetic result has been lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken of all patients undergoing abdominoplasty in the author's practice from 2016 to 2022. A full abdominoplasty was performed, usually with liposuction (87%). All patients were treated under total intravenous anesthesia without paralysis or prone positioning. A single closed suction drain was removed 3 or 4 days after surgery. All procedures were performed as outpatients. Ultrasound surveillance was used to detect any deep venous thromboses. No patient received chemoprophylaxis. The operating table was flexed, often to 90°. Deep fascial anchoring sutures were used to attach the Scarpa fascia of the flap to the deep muscle fascia. Measurements of the scar level were made at intervals after surgery up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Three hundred ten patients were evaluated, including 300 women. The mean follow-up time was 1 year. The overall complication rate, which included minor scar deformities, was 35.8%. Five deep venous thromboses were detected. There were no hematomas. Fifteen patients (4.8%) developed seromas that were successfully treated by aspiration. The mean vertical scar level 1 month after surgery was 9.9 cm (range, 6.1-12.9 cm). There was no significant change in scar level at subsequent follow-up times up to 1 year. By comparison, the scar level in published studies ranged from 8.6 to 14.1 cm.

DISCUSSION

Avoidance of electrodissection reduces tissue trauma that causes seromas. Flexed patient positioning during surgery and deep fascial anchoring sutures are effective in keeping the scar low. By avoiding chemoprophylaxis, hematomas can be avoided. Limiting the dissection (lipoabdominoplasty), preserving the Scarpa fascia, and adding quilting (progressive tension) sutures are unnecessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Total intravenous anesthesia offers important safety advantages. Avoiding electrodissection is effective in keeping seroma rates at a tolerable level (5%), and the scar low and more easily concealed. Alternative methods present disadvantages that may contribute to a suboptimal aesthetic result and require additional operating time.

The Addition of Partial or Circumferential Liposuction to Abdominoplasty Is Not Associated With a Higher Risk of Skin Necrosis

BACKGROUND

Combining abdominoplasty with liposuction is a common practice for optimal patient aesthetic outcomes. In the past, several practitioners have argued against liposuction due to the potential for vascular insufficiency, especially with central liposuction. Despite these concerns for flap damage with resultant necrosis, the incidence of this complication has not been comprehensively investigated.

OBJECTIVES

The authors therefore examined the incidence of necrotic complications, including skin and fat necrosis as well as partial/total flap loss, in patients who underwent abdominoplasty alone (AA) or abdominoplasty with partial or circumferential liposuction (APCL).

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in PubMed/Medline and Embase with no query limits. For the systematic review, data from the studies were extracted into a form including primary author, publication year, study design, number of AA and APCL patients, abdominal zone(s) treated with liposuction, average lipoaspirate volume, follow-up time, necrotic complications, and revision procedures. A meta-analysis was separately performed for 13 studies that included patients who underwent both AA and APCL.

RESULTS

The overall rate of necrotic complications was lower in the APCL group (0.39%) compared with the AA group (1.01%). The incidence of necrotic complications was low for all patients, with a pooled partial flap loss rate of 0.24% and a pooled skin necrosis rate of 0.23%. The forest plots revealed that patients who underwent APCL do not face a higher risk of skin necrosis or revision compared with those who underwent AA.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing APCL is a safe combined procedural approach and can confer added benefits of improved patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Sub-Scarpa's Lipectomy in Abdominoplasty: An Analysis of Risks and Rewards in 723 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

During the course of performing abdominoplasties, a plastic surgeon will encounter a certain body habitus characterized by a thick, tethered, and excessively redundant upper skin flap. Often these patients also demonstrate diffuse and substantial fascial laxity. One approach to this problem involves direct thinning and release of the flap by resection of the sub-Scarpa's fat pad. In theory, this resection should be safe from a flap perfusion standpoint. However, the safety of the sub-Scarpa's resection has not been completely documented.

OBJECTIVES

The author sought to assess the safety and efficacy of sub-Scarpa's lipectomy in abdominoplasty.

METHODS

A total 723 patients were retrospectively examined and divided into 2 groups: those with (Group B) and those without (Group A) a sub-Scarpa's lipectomy component to the abdominoplasty. Because of differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, data analysis was performed with a logistic regression model and with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The sub-Scarpa's lipectomy technique allowed for substantial thinning of the flap: the average weight of the resected fat pad was 411 g. Wide undermining allowed for substantial fascial correction, and excellent results were obtainable even in challenging cases. The sub-Scarpa's lipectomy group did not demonstrate an increase in either minor (<5 cm2) or major (>5 cm2) flap necrosis. However, there was a statistically significant increase in fat necrosis and seroma formation in Group B compared with Group A. In both groups, an increasing body mass index was a risk factor for fat necrosis and major flap necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a sub-Scarpa's lipectomy during abdominoplasty is a useful technique to consider for selected abdominoplasty candidates. The risks of minor and major flap loss do not seem to be increased compared to the standard abdominoplasty, but the risks of fat necrosis and seroma formation may be greater.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Evidence-Based Abdominoplasty Review With Body Contouring Algorithm

Abdominal contour deformities are an aesthetic challenge to the plastic surgeon. Patients present with diverse clinical histories, multiple comorbidities, and unique aesthetic demands. Weight loss, previous pregnancy, and aging are 3 principal indications for abdominoplasty. Bariatric surgery has increased demand for body contouring procedures. This heterogeneous patient cohort means a "one-size-fits-all" abdominoplasty is not appropriate. Precise evaluation, evidence-based decision-making, and artistic acumen are required while balancing patient goals with safe, realistic, and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes. This article reviews surgical options for abdominal body contouring, providing an evidence-based treatment algorithm for selecting the appropriate procedure for each patient to maximize clinical and patient reported outcomes.

Safety of Lipoabdominoplasty Versus Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lipoabdominoplasty is a powerful operation to maintain a youthful physique for aging people, improve body contouring, and remove excess skin caused by massive weight loss. Nonetheless, it is controversial to combine abdominoplasty and liposuction because of the potential for vascular damage of the abdominal flap and increased complications. The purpose of this article was to determine the complication rates of lipoabdominoplasty compared with traditional abdominoplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through July of 2018. Study results were analyzed utilizing a fixed random effects model. The outcomes were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 trials enrolling 14,061 adult patients were searched. Of these patients, 577 (4.1%) developed seroma; 113 (0.8%) experienced hematoma; 783 (5.6%) experienced wound infection, dehiscence, or fat necrosis; 35 (0.2%) developed deep venous thrombosis; and 110 (0.7%) experienced scar deformity. A forest plot revealed fewer complications in the lipoabdominoplasty group than in the traditional abdominoplasty group (RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97; p = 0.017). Subgroup analysis showed that the lipoabdominoplasty group had a lower incidence of hematoma (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p = 0.009) and seroma (RR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.85; p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Lipoabdominoplasty is a valuable tool to perfect body shape. This meta-analysis showed no evidence that it was associated with higher rates of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Panniculectomy after bariatric surgical weight loss: Analysis of complications and modifiable risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery results in massive weight loss, leaving many patients with redundant skin that can cause significant physical and psychosocial limitations. We sought to identify variables associated with postoperative complications and adjuncts associated with the mitigation of postoperative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all post-bariatric surgery patients who underwent panniculectomy over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Total 706 patients included. Overall complication rate was 56%: dehiscence (24%), surgical site infection (22%), seroma (18%), and post-operative bleeding (5%). Return to operating room rate was 12%. Significant factors were: BMI >26 (p < 0.01), fleur-de-lis panniculectomy (p < 0.01), concomitant hernia repair (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated ASA class >2 (OR 1.97, p < 0.05) and incision type (OR 1.64, p < 0.05) to be independent predictors of morbidity.

CONCLUSION

High morbidity for post-bariatric panniculectomy is primarily local wound complications. Potentially modifiable factors that increase the complication risk profile include higher BMI, higher ASA class, and the use of fleur-de-lis incision.

Drainless Abdominoplasty Using Barbed Progressive Tension Sutures

We describe our current technique of drainless abdominoplasty using barbed progressive tension sutures. The perioperative management and detailed steps of procedure are outlined, including indications for concomitantly performing liposuction and repair of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles. This approach reliably improves abdominal contour, minimizes complications, and is straightforward to learn and perform.

Prevention of Seroma Formation Following Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

With seroma formation being the most common complication of abdominoplasty, multiple surgical strategies have been proposed to lower the seroma rate, yet their effectiveness is unclear.

Objectives

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively summarize and quantify the effects of preventive surgical measures for seroma in patients undergoing abdominoplasty.

Methods

A predetermined protocol was used. An electronic search in MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL electronic databases was conducted from inception to June 2016. This search was supplemented by a review of reference lists of potentially eligible studies and a manual search of key journals in the field of plastic surgery. Eligible studies were prospective controlled studies, which investigated prevention of seroma formation and reported on seroma rate. Secondary outcomes were rate of hematoma, wound dehiscence, infection, reoperation and hospital readmission, time to drain removal, total drain output, and length of hospital stay.

Results

The meta-analysis included nine studies with 664 abdominoplasty patients. Seroma rate was 7.5% in the prevention group and 19.5% in the control group with the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) being 0.26 (0.10-0.67), P = .006, favoring the prevention group. Similar results were also revealed for infection rate, time to drain removal, and length of hospital stay. Subgroup analysis showed that preservation of Scarpa's fascia, tissue adhesives and, possibly, progressive tension sutures reduce, independently, seroma formation.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that the use of certain preventive measures during abdominoplasty, compared to conventional procedure, reduces seroma formation.

Level of Evidence 2

Lessons Learned After 15 Years of Circumferential Bodylift Surgery

Circumferential bodylift is a powerful procedure for achieving dramatic and natural body contouring changes in the massive weight loss patient. The care of these patients has raised our awareness of several important issues including safety, nutritional status, skin quality, recurrent laxity, surgical steps, and postoperative scars. Integration of this knowledge with various technical modifications over the last 15 years has improved our care for this cohort. We have not only seen a rise in the number of surgeries performed, but also the development of principles, techniques, and details that the authors feel necessary to share to achieve improved contour and more predictable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

The Impact of Protein Nutritional Supplementation for Massive Weight Loss Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

As more patients undergo bariatric surgery to assist with weight loss, the demand for post-bariatric body contouring surgery, to address both functional and aesthetic concerns, is increasing. However, high wound healing complication rates remain a significant problem for these patients. One theory is that chronic malnourishment and hypoproteinemia may contribute significantly to these wound healing complications.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment protein nutritional supplementation on wound healing in post-bariatric surgery massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Our hypothesis was that protein supplementation would decrease wound healing complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 23 post-bariatric surgery patients undergoing abdominoplasty who received pretreatment protein nutritional supplementation. This group was compared with a historical control group of 23 post-bariatric surgery patients who underwent abdominoplasty in the period immediately before the implementation of the protein supplementation protocol. Patient demographics and procedural characteristics were similar for the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were identified who had undergone abdominoplasty, half of whom were prescribed the protein supplementation protocol. Overall wound healing complication rates were significantly lower in the protein-supplemented group (0.0% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between the protein supplementation and historical control groups in regards to total complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment protein supplementation is a simple intervention that can significantly decrease wound healing complications in post-bariatric surgery massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

Comparison of Limited and Full Dissection Abdominoplasty Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging to Evaluate Perfusion of the Abdominal Skin

BACKGROUND

In an effort to reduce risk, some surgeons promote a limited dissection abdominoplasty technique. They believe that preserving musculocutaneous perforators improves blood supply to the overlying abdominal tissue and that improved vascularity avoids seromas and reduces wound healing problems. Laser fluorescence imaging is a new method that allows quantitative measurements of perfusion.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive women undergoing abdominoplasty agreed to participate in this prospective study. The inclusion rate was 100 percent. The SPY Elite Intraoperative Perfusion Assessment System was used to quantitate flap perfusion. Patients served as their own controls to avoid confounders. All patients received superwet infusions followed by liposuction of the abdomen and flanks. First, a limited dissection was performed, preserving medial musculocutaneous perforating blood vessels and the Scarpa fascia on the lower abdomen. The rectus fascia was repaired in all cases. A temporary superficial fascial wound closure was performed. The patient was imaged after injection of the contrast agent. The dissection was then extended to a full abdominoplasty and the Scarpa fascia was removed from the lower abdomen. The patient was reimaged. Wound tension was also measured.

RESULTS

Complications included one distal deep venous thrombosis, one infection, and one seroma. There were no cases of marginal necrosis or dehiscence. There was no significant difference (p < 0.05) in perfusion measurements comparing the limited and full dissections. Wound tensions were significantly less (p < 0.001) in the full-dissection group.

CONCLUSION

The limited dissection abdominoplasty does not provide a significant improvement in perfusion compared with a full dissection.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Evaluation of Face Lift Skin Perfusion and Epinephrine Effect Using Laser Fluorescence Imaging

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Face lift dissections are believed to compromise skin flap circulation, possibly leading to wound healing complications. To reduce blood loss, plastic surgeons commonly inject a solution of local anesthetic that contains epinephrine. However, the effect of surgery on skin perfusion and the degree of vasoconstriction caused by the epinephrine have not been quantitated. Little information is available to guide the selection of epinephrine concentration.