2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting

Is there consensus on diagnostics and treatment in colonic diverticulitis? Results of international survey

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines (CGs) developed by expert communities benefit both the patient and the clinician. Meanwhile a considerable proportion of specialists are not familiar with or follow them in their daily practice. Colonic diverticulitis (CD) is the third most common cause of hospitalization among patients with gastrointestinal diseases and common indication for colon resection. Actual tactics for diagnosis and treatment of CD, as well as data on what influences its choice and how the decisions made agree with the existing CGs can be identified by anonymous surveys.

METHODS

An anonymous internet survey of surgeons and coloproctologists was conducted. Groups of questions included demographics of the respondents; self-esteem score; sources of guidance in decision-making; classification systems for CD; preferable diagnostic tests; management of CD; indications for elective surgery; and outcomes of surgical treatment and others (n = 17). The study was conducted in accordance with the CHERRIES criteria. The required minimum sample size was calculated as 377 participants.

RESULTS

The study involved 401 respondents from 9 countries: 76.1% were general surgeons and 14.5% were colorectal surgeons. Excellent or good knowledge of the problem was claimed by 82.8% of the colorectal vs 66.2% of the general surgeons (p = 0.013). In decision-making respondents were largely guided by their professional experience, methods adopted in their clinic and domestic CGs. General Surgeons more often chose tactics inconsistent with CGs than coloproctologists. The largest differences between subgroups were noted for awareness of the reversal of Hartmann's procedure, most common postoperative complications and indications for elective surgery.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the existing CGs was poor, which entails significant variation in the approaches practiced by the respondents from different cohorts. There is no consensus on the aspects that are not yet covered in the CGs. Further research is needed to elucidate these gaps and update the guidelines accordingly.

Meta-analysis and systematic review of long-term quality of life and recurrence following elective surgery versus non-operative management for colonic diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on long-term outcomes of elective surgery versus nonoperative management of complicated diverticulitis. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes of nonoperative management versus elective surgery in patients initially conservatively treated for diverticulitis.

METHODS

Systematic review of PubMed and Scopus for studies comparing elective resection and nonoperative management of acute diverticulitis from inception to December 2023 was conducted. Studies reporting long-term outcomes (≥2 years) were included. Main outcomes were quality of life, disease recurrence, and long-term ostomy.

RESULTS

After screening 1,488 studies, 3 randomized controlled trials and 6 retrospective studies (3,621 patients; 44.4% males; median age: 59 years) were included. Elective colon resection was associated with significantly higher Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores (mean difference 6.06, 95% confidence interval 2.22-9.9, P = .002), and Short Form Health Survey-36 scores for both mental and physical components (mean differences: 3.47 and 3.42, respectively). Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score difference was more noted in the randomized controlled trial subgroup analysis (mean difference: 8.68, 95% confidence interval 3.37-14.0, P = .001). These effect sizes were small according to Cohen d (0.34 and 0.31, respectively). Elective resection was associated with significantly less disease recurrence (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.64, P = .002) than nonoperative management. No significant difference in long-term stoma was observed (odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 0.89-2.6, P = .12).

CONCLUSION

Elective resection was associated with significantly improved long-term quality of life and reduced recurrence of acute diverticulitis. However, the clinical significance of the difference in quality of life scores between the treatment approaches remains uncertain because of the small effect size observed. Any quality of life improvements must be balanced against surgical morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of the outcomes of postdiverticulitis investigations: a multicentre cohort study including 1,120 patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the yield of the endoscopic investigations performed following the resolution of acute diverticulitis.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study included patients with multislice computed tomography (MSCT)-proven diverticulitis, in four NHS hospitals, between January 2016 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of colonic cancer in the diseased segment. Secondary outcomes included the rate of malignancy in the nondiseased colonic segments, the benign colonic polyp detection rate, the rate of malignancy in the resected surgical specimens in patients who underwent an emergency surgery on the index admission and the rate of complications in the investigated group.

RESULTS

A total of 1,120 patients were included in the study, out of which 604 were females, with a median age of 61 years; 731 patients (65%) had uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1A) while 389 (35%) had complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1B-4). Following the acute episode, 757 (74%) patients had subsequent endoscopic evaluation. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenomas (AA) in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis was 0.14%. In the complicated diverticulitis group, the incidence of CRC/AA in patients with Hinchey 1b and Hinchey 2 was 1.4% and 5.4%, respectively. Out of the 107 patients who underwent emergency colonic resection for suspected perforated diverticulitis, 18 (16.8%) had histological evidence of colonic malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic investigations following uncomplicated diverticulitis have a low yield for sinister colonic pathology. Colonoscopy should be planned following complicated diverticulitis and in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis with suspicious radiological finding on index imaging or in patients with ongoing clinical manifestations. In patients who undergo emergency surgery, oncological principles should be applied whenever possible.

SAGES white paper on antibiotic omission in the management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: why, when, who, and most importantly, how

BACKGROUND

Historically, the management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis was centered on antibiotics. However, modern theories regarding the pathogenesis of diverticulitis have challenged the notion that antibiotics are necessary in all cases. Despite major reform in many societal guidelines, the adoption of non-antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated diverticulitis has been limited, especially in North America. The purpose of this SAGES White Paper was to review the available evidence on antibiotic omission in uncomplicated diverticulitis and to explore methods of safe implementation.

METHODS

A task force within the SAGES Colorectal Surgery Committee was formed to work on this White Paper. The committee and its leadership approved an outline that would focus on the following topics: (1) Defining the problem with unnecessary antibiotic exposure; (2) Evaluating the evidence on antibiotic omission in uncomplicated diverticulitis; (3) Identifying the appropriate patient for antibiotic omission; (4) Outlining how to counsel patients who are treated without antibiotics; (5) Reviewing methods to safely implement this practice in both the hospital and community setting. These topics were divided up among members of the task force who performed a structured literature search in preparation for their assignments.

RESULTS

Antibiotics are associated with several patient and societal adverse effects, including the rising problem of antimicrobial resistance. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no superiority to the routine administration of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Appropriate patients for antibiotic omission include those who are immunocompetent, non-septic, and have mild symptoms/disease severity on imaging. Existing frameworks for the safe implementation of new practices can be referenced to help increase adoption of non-antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

The existing body of evidence supports antibiotic omission in appropriate cases of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. In order to increase the widespread adoption of this practice, buy-in from key stakeholders (both healthcare professionals and patients) is necessary.

Sigmoid Resection vs Conservative Treatment After Diverticulitis: Prespecified 4-Year Analysis of the LASER Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection is a treatment option for patients with recurring, persistent painful, or complicated diverticulitis, but outcomes of surgery compared with conservative treatment are unclear in long-term follow-up.

Objective

To compare quality-of-life (QOL), complication, and recurrence outcomes of surgery vs conservative treatment in patients with recurring, persistent painful, or complicated diverticulitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The open-label Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 Finnish hospitals. Ninety patients with recurring, persistent painful, or complicated diverticulitis were randomized (1:1) to elective sigmoid resection or conservative treatment from September 2014 to October 2018. Herein, outcomes are reported at 4-year follow-up using the intention-to-treat principle. Data analysis for this 4-year follow-up was performed from October 2023 to November 2024.

Interventions

Laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection vs conservative treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Secondary outcomes, such as Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores, complications, and recurrences, within 4 years are reported using intention-to-treat and post hoc per-protocol analyses.

Results

Of 90 enrolled patients (28 male [31%] with mean [SD] age of 54.11 [11.9] years; 62 female [69%] with mean [SD] age of 57.13 [7.6] years), 45 were randomized to elective sigmoid resection and 45 to conservative treatment. Among those randomized to conservative treatment, 14 of 44 (32%) underwent sigmoid resection within 4 years (patients with lower QOL on average). The mean (SD) GIQLI score was 115.3 (17.8) in the surgery group vs 109.8 (19.8) in the conservative treatment group (mean difference, 5.54 [95% CI, -2.98 to 14.06]) at 4 years. Recurrence of diverticulitis occurred in 6 of 38 patients (16%) (4 [10%] after surgery) in the surgery group vs 34 of 37 patients (92%) in the conservative treatment group. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (10%) in the surgery group vs 5 patients (11%) in the conservative treatment group.

Conclusions and Relevance

High crossover rates from conservative treatment to surgery indicate that patients with low QOL in the conservative treatment group often require surgical intervention; elective sigmoid resection did not improve QOL compared with conservative treatment in 4-year follow-up, even though it was effective in preventing recurrences of diverticulitis and did not lead to increased rates of postoperative complications. Upfront surgery may be preferable in patients with low QOL, but initial conservative treatment is an option for patients with near-normal QOL.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174926.

Minimally invasive approach to peritonitis from left colonic perforation: a retrospective multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic procedures have nowadays become the gold standard in multiple abdominal diseases, but in the emergency setting, especially in major surgery, laparoscopy still represents an obstacle for most surgeons. This multicentric study aims to define the surgical approach for emergency resective surgery in left colonic perforation peritonitis, determine the factors influencing the choice between MIS and open surgery, and identify factors associated with laparotomic conversion.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 516 patients treated for left colonic perforation between January 2019 and December 2023 across six Italian centers was collected. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, disease and surgical characteristics, post-operative complications, and long-term outcomes. Univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to identify factors associated with surgical choice and likelihood of conversion.

RESULTS

Only 24.5% of patients underwent laparoscopic approach, with a conversion rate of 52.8%. MIS was associated to lower CCI and MPI and less severe septic status at arrival. MIS was mostly performed by colorectal surgeons, compared to acute care surgeons. The post-operative outcome, considering LOS, ICU admission, post-operative complications and mortality rate, was better in the MIS group. The multivariate regression model revealed that CCI, MPI, and night-time surgery were negatively associated with MIS while colorectal surgeons had a positive association. Laparotomic conversion more commonly occurred in older patients with a higher MPI and CCI and more severe septic status; these patients had a worse post-operative outcome. MPI was the only factor with statistical significance in the univariate analysis, associated with conversion.

CONCLUSION

Although MIS is associated with better post-operative outcomes, it is underutilized in the emergency setting. Patients requiring laparotomic conversion had higher morbidity and mortality compared to those who underwent successful laparoscopy. Limiting factors for MIS include logistic factors, patient severity, and surgical skills, therefore careful patient selection and surgical training is crucial.

Comparison of acute pancreatitis and acute on chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute on chronic pancreatitis (ACP) shares a similar clinical presentation with acute pancreatitis (AP) and is often diagnosed and treated in the same way. However, these two conditions may have distinct clinical risk profiles and prognoses. There is currently limited evidence available regarding the specific characteristics of ACP.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of AP or ACP between 2017 and 2019 at two tertiary referral centers. The primary outcome was disease severity as defined by the Atlanta classification. Secondary outcomes included the presence of local and systemic complications, organ failure, ICU admission, and mortality. Differences in outcomes between ACP and AP were compared using multivariate logistic regression models, with results presented as odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

We included 1163 patients, 90% of whom had AP and 10% had ACP. ACP patients were predominantly male (81 vs. 46%; P  < 0.001), whereas AP patients were older (mean age 62.6 vs. 56.5 years, P  < 0.001). ACP patients had lower amylase and lipase levels ( P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no difference in the risk of moderate or severe pancreatitis (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.66-1.98; P  = 0.615). ACP patients had a higher risk of local complications (predominantly pseudocysts) (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.00-2.92; P  = 0.049) and a lower risk of organ failure ( P  = 0.019) and ICU admission ( P  = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms previous observations that ACP has a more favorable in-hospital prognosis than AP and extends these findings to a modern European setting.

Management of secondary fistulas following bariatric surgery using endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure

Obesity significantly impacts individuals' quality of life. Bariatric surgery, including vertical sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, is effective for long-term weight loss but has increased post-bariatric complications like fistulas. We treated three patients with post-bariatric complications. Cases included a gastropleural fistula secondary to vertical sleeve gastrectomy and an esophagojejunal fistula secondary to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) was used, applying continuous negative pressure via a polyurethane sponge connected to suction. The EVAC technique effectively managed complex post-bariatric fistulas, facilitating closure and improving outcomes. Patient selection and technical expertise are crucial for optimizing EVAC results. This innovative approach offers a promising solution for post-bariatric complications, enhancing recovery and quality of life.

Combination of radiomic and clinical characteristics to predict mortality in patients with colorectal perforation

PURPOSE

We aim to construct and verify a model combining radiomic and clinical data to predict early mortality in patients with colorectal perforation in a two-center study.

METHODS

Data from 147 patients at Xiaogan Central Hospital (2014-2024) and 52 patients at Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University (2021-2023) were collected for model training and validation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality. Radiomic characteristics from CT scans were extracted via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to construct an imaging score. A nomogram was developed by integrating the findings from the multivariate analysis. Predictive performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and clinical utility was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis highlighted age, ASA classification, shock index, rad-score, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil (N) and lymphocyte (L) counts, sodium (Na+), creatinine (Cr), and procalcitonin (PCT) as significant prognostic indicators for mortality (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed age, ASA classification, PCT, and rad-score as independent prognostic factors. The radiomic combined with clinical characteristics nomogram (RCCCN) includes four variables: the patient's age, ASA classification, PCT level, and rad-score. The RCCCN model demonstrated excellent predictive performance for mortality risk in the validation cohort (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99) with good calibration.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram combining radiomic features and clinical characteristics effectively predicts mortality in patients with colorectal perforation, providing a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and patient management.

A Contemporary Multifaceted Insight into the Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Diverticular Disease: An Update About Geriatric Syndrome

Introduction: Diverticular disease, once considered a rare geriatric gastrointestinal condition, has now become a prevalent disorder associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs. The spectrum of complications from diverticular disease ranges from incidental findings to more serious issues such as bleeding and diverticulitis. Symptomatic diverticular disease represents a significant economic burden in the western world. Diabetes mellitus is a major global health issue. As global aging accelerates, geriatric syndromes such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and diverticular disease (DD) are becoming increasingly prevalent. Understanding their interplay is critical, particularly within the geriatric population. Both conditions are linked to lifestyle, dietary habits, and changes in gut physiology. Additionally, age-related alterations in the gut microbiome and immune system make this association more complex, contributing to morbidity and healthcare burdens in older adults. The primary aim of this review is to provide an update on the association between diabetes mellitus and diverticular disease. Methods: This narrative review explores the association between diabetes mellitus and diverticular disease. Relevant articles were identified by searching major databases. Results: Risk factors for diverticular disease include insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, smoking, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, lack of physical activity, a low-fibre diet, and a high-carbohydrate diet. These risk factors are also associated with the development of diabetes mellitus. Major population studies indicate that diabetes can either increase the risk of diverticular disease or have a neutral impact. A complication of diabetes mellitus includes impaired intestinal peristalsis and enteric nervous system dysfunction, which can ultimately lead to the formation of intestinal diverticula. High-calorie foods low in fibre are a staple in the diets of many type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, contributing to gut dysbiosis. A detrimental consequence of dysbiosis is a breach in the protective intestinal barrier, which promotes the development of diverticulosis. Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus may be associated with diverticular disease, and the risk factors that contribute to diabetes mellitus can also be linked to diverticular disease. Further studies are needed to explore the complex relationship between diabetes mellitus and diverticular disease.

Diverticulitis in Older Adults: A Review of Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis accounts for over 300,000 hospitalizations annually in the United States and its incidence increases with age. Among older adults, diverticulitis is the fourth leading cause for emergency surgery. Older adults with multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes are often excluded from clinical studies, leaving a gap in the evidence needed to guide management. Here, we provide a clinically oriented review of the diagnosis and management of older adults with diverticulitis through the lens of age-friendly care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the literature describing the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of diverticulitis in older adults. Due to age-related physiologic changes, the presence of geriatric syndromes, and multimorbidity, older adults with diverticulitis often present with atypical symptoms, variable laboratory findings, and are at higher risk for complications than younger patients. Guidelines support a more aggressive approach to diagnosis in this population, with lower threshold for obtaining diagnostic imaging. Antibiotics remain a mainstay of treatment for uncomplicated disease, and surgical management should be focused on severity of disease and the balance between the likelihood of improving quality of life and risks and burden of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Diverticulitis is a common disease that has a unique presentation among older individuals with limited evidence to guide management. Diagnosis and treatment should focus on what matters most to the patient, providing the most meaningful outcome possible within the context of multimorbidity, patient goals, symptom burden, and anticipated treatment outcomes.

EAES rapid guideline: surgical management of complicated diverticulitis - with ESCP participation

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of complicated diverticulitis varies across Europe. EAES members prioritized this topic to be addressed by a clinical practice guideline through an online questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for key stakeholders involved in the treatment of complicated diverticulitis; to improve operative and perioperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life through a systematic evidence-to-decision approach by a diverse, multidisciplinary panel.

METHODS

Informed by a linked individual participant data network meta-analysis of resection and primary anastomosis (PRA) versus Hartmann's resection (HR) versus laparoscopic lavage (LPL), a panel of general and colorectal surgeons, patient partners, trialists, and fellows appraised the certainty of the evidence using GRADE and CINeMA. The panel discussed the evidence using the evidence-to-decision framework during a synchronous consensus meeting. An asynchronous modified Delphi survey was used to establish consensus.

RESULTS

The panel suggests that patients with complicated diverticulitis without sepsis receive PRA over HR or LPL when there is availability of a surgeon with skills and experience in colorectal surgery. HR is suggested over PRA or LPL in the subgroups of septic, frail, as well as immunocompromised patients. These recommendations apply to patients with an indication for surgery. Surgeons and patients should first consider conditionally recommended interventions, then conditionally recommended against. Based on the evidence, the key benefit of PRA was a higher likelihood of not having a stoma at 1 year, with similar risks across comparisons. Conditional recommendations call for shared decision-making when considering management options. The full guideline with user-friendly decision aids is available in https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/7490 .

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-informed recommendations on the management of patients with complicated diverticulitis in accordance with the highest methodological standards through a structured framework informed by an international, multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders.

ESR Essentials: image guided drainage of fluid collections-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe

This ESR Essentials article intends to provide detailed, step-by-step, information on the role of imaging in the diagnosis, procedural management, and follow-up of patients with fluid collections. Evidence-based medicine recommendations for the positioning of percutaneous drainages and/or for diagnostic/therapeutic aspiration of fluid collections are provided. Although medical history, clinical symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests can raise suspicions regarding a collection, an imaging assessment is usually necessary for the diagnosis. Radiologists can easily identify fluid collections that are clinically suspected by using a wide range of imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and cone-beam CT. Consequently, these imaging methods (either alone or combined), can be used to aspirate the collection or for the placement of a drainage catheter. The choice of imaging technique to be used is influenced by the location of the collection, operator preference, size, and content of the collection. In addition, it is of utmost importance to underline the role of the interventional radiologist in the management and follow-up of patients with percutaneous drains, in collaboration with surgeons, clinicians, and diagnostic radiologists. KEY POINTS: Indications for percutaneous imaging-guided drainage are supported by clinical findings, laboratory tests, and pre-procedural imaging. Deciding between aspiration or drain insertion should follow patient assessment and fluid collection characterization. The interventional radiologist should be part of the entire patient care process including follow-up.

Longer Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage in the Management of Acute Hinchey III Perforated Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the current evidence regarding long-term outcomes using laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) versus primary bowel resection (PR) in Hinchey III diverticulitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken based upon articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 1, 2024. Databases Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase were used employing the key search terms "Diverticulitis" and "Peritoneal Lavage." Articles were selected according to the PRISMA guidelines and statistical analysis was undertaken. Cumulative analysis of diverticulitis recurrence and secondary outcomes of disease-related mortality, serious adverse events, stoma incidence, reoperation, and readmission rates were performed.

RESULTS

An initial search identified 506 articles for review. A total of 294 patients were included for final analysis from 3 prospective randomized controlled trials. There was no significant difference in disease-related mortality or serious adverse events between LPL and PR. There was significantly decreased likelihood of having a stoma in the LPL group; however, there was also a significantly increased likelihood of having recurrent diverticulitis. There was heterogenicity across all trials.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of level 1 evidence available regarding the long-term outcomes of Hinchey III diverticulitis managed with LPL. At 3-year follow-up, there is a significantly decreased likelihood of having a stoma, tempered by the fact that there is a significantly increased likelihood of having recurrent diverticulitis. Further homogenous high-quality randomized studies are required to clarify whether LPL shows long-term benefit over PR.

Comparison of Non-Contrast CT vs. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Both Intravenous and Rectal Contrast Application for Diagnosis of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Multireader, Retrospective Single-Center Study

Objectives: To evaluate the non-inferiority of non-contrast CT compared to contrast-enhanced CT with both intravenous and rectal contrast application for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Methods: Five readers retrospectively evaluated the non-contrast and contrast-enhanced series of CTs of 205 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis. Two randomized reading sessions, both containing all 205 cases as either contrast-enhanced or non-contrast (1:1) series, were performed with ≥8 weeks washout between them. The non-inferiority margin was set to 0.1. Results: The pooled prevalence (all readers) of diverticulitis was similar for non-contrast CT (63.9%, range: 60.5-65.0%) and contrast-enhanced CT (64.4%, 61.5-67.8%). Non-contrast CT was non-inferior for the diagnosis of diverticulitis (accuracy 0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.89, 0.92]) compared to contrast-enhanced CT (0.92 [0.90, 0.94]; the difference in accuracy: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.01]) (normal deviate test: p-valueone-sided = 5.20 × 10-6). Sensitivities for perforation and abscess were slightly but significantly lower for the non-contrast CT than for the contrast-enhanced CT (differences: -0.15 [-0.20, -0.05], -0.17 [-0.27, -0.07]), while no differences in accuracies and specificities were observed. Conclusions: Non-contrast CT is non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CT (intravenous and rectal contrast) for the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis. Contrast-enhanced CT is associated with significantly higher sensitivities for the presence of an abscess or perforation.

Diagnosis and treatment experience of cecal diverticulitis in six pediatric patients

Objective

This study aims to summarize the clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and treatment experience of cecal diverticulitis in children.

Method

The clinical data of six pediatric patients with cecal diverticulitis, treated at Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University from November 2021 to May 2023, were retrospectively analyzed.

Result

All patients presented with abdominal pain primarily in the lower right abdomen. Two cases had fever with a maximum body temperature not exceeding 38.0°C. Three cases exhibited elevated inflammatory markers such as white blood cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) upon admission. Three children were misdiagnosed with acute appendicitis based on preoperative color Doppler ultrasound. Two children were treated with third-generation cephalosporins and ornidazole for anti-inflammatory therapy and were cured after 6 and 9 days of hospitalization, respectively. Four children underwent laparoscopic surgery with excision of the cecal diverticulum and cecal repair, all of whom recovered well without postoperative complications. The operation duration ranged from 100 to 170 min, with an average of 140 min. Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 5 to 10 ml, averaging 6.75 ml. The overall length of hospital stay was 8-12 days, with an average stay of 9.5 days. All patients were followed up until December 2023, with no recurrences observed.

Conclusion

Children with cecal diverticulitis, especially complex cecal diverticulitis, are easily misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis. Acute simple cecal diverticulitis can be treated with anti-inflammatory therapy. Laparoscopic cecal diverticulectomy combined with cecal repair is a feasible and effective method for treating acute complex cecal diverticulitis.

Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and management of colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease

Colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease are among the most common gastrointestinal disorders encountered in clinical practice. These Italian guidelines focus on the diagnosis and management of diverticulosis and diverticular disease in the adult population, providing practical and evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Experts from five Italian scientific societies, constituting a multidisciplinary panel, conducted a comprehensive review of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, and observational studies to formulate 14 PICO questions. The assessment of the quality of the evidence and the formulation of the recommendations were carried out using an adaptation of the GRADE methodology. The guidelines covered the following topics: i) Management of diverticulosis; ii) Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease: diagnosis and treatment; iii) Acute diverticulitis: diagnosis and treatment; iv) Management of diverticular disease complications; v) Prevention of recurrent acute diverticulitis; vi) Interventional management of diverticular disease.

Ambulatory management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AmbUDiv study): a multicentre, propensity score matching study

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have suggested that ambulatory management is feasible for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD); however, there is still no consensus regarding the most appropriate management settings. This study presents a multi-centre experience of managing patients presenting with AUD, specifically focusing on clinical outcomes and comparing ambulatory treatment with in-patient management.

METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted across four hospitals in the UK and included all adult patients with computed tomography (CT) confirmed (Hinchey grade 1a) acute diverticulitis over a 12-month period (January - December 2022). Patient medical records were followed up for 1-year post-index episode, and outcomes were compared between those treated through the ambulatory pathway versus inpatient treatment using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). All statistical analysis was performed using the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 4.4.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients with Hinchey 1a acute diverticulitis were included (260 in-patients; 88 ambulatory pathway), of which nearly a third (31.3%) had a recurrent disease. Inpatient management was dominant (74.7%), with a median of 3 days of hospital stay. PSM resulted in 172 patients equally divided between the two care settings. Ambulatory management was associated with a lower readmission rate (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.08 after PSM), comparable surgical (P = 0.57 before PSM, 0% in both groups after PSM) and radiological interventions (P = 0.99 before and after PSM) within one year. In both matched and non-matched groups, a strong association between readmissions and inpatient management was noted in univariate analysis (P = 0.03 before PSM, P = 0.04 after PSM) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.03 after PSM).

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the safety and efficacy of managing patients with AUD through a well-designed ambulatory care pathway. In particular, hospital re-admission rates are lower and other outcomes are non-inferior to in-patient treatment. This has implications for substantial cost-savings and better utilisation of limited healthcare resources.

Long-term treatment outcomes of complicated acute diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE

The main aim of this study was to determine the short- and long-term outcomes of the non-operative management of acute left-sided complicated diverticulitis (ALCD) in severely immunocompromised patients (IMS group) and compare them with immunocompetent patients (IC group). The secondary aim was to assess the necessity of an elective surgery following a successful prior non-operative management in the IMS group after a non-operative management of the first episode of ALCD.

METHODS

Patients presented with their first episode of ALCD between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Only severely immunosuppressed patients were considered for the analysis, including the following: long-term oral or intravenous steroid intake, current malignancy undergoing chemotherapy, chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, or solid organ transplant with immunosuppressive medication. For each group, demographic data, severity of the episode, management decisions (conservative or operative), and short- and long-term outcomes were recorded and compared. A sub-analysis of patients with ALCD associating and abscess (modified Hinchey classification Ib/II) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients were included in the study: 50 among the IMS and 240 among the IC group. The rate of emergent surgery was higher in the IMS group (50.0% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.001) and was associated with increased morbidity (72.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.041) and mortality (24.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003). The duration of the hospital stay was significantly longer in the IMS group (15 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The final stoma rate was significantly higher in the IMS group (82.1% vs. 22.9, p < 0.001), with a median follow-up of 51.4 months. A total of 141 patients presented ALCD with an abscess; 25 in the IMS and 116 in the IC group. There was a higher rate of surgical intervention among the IMS group as the initial treatment approach (24.0% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.002), even though the conservative treatment had a similar rate of success (81.3% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.178). The recurrence rate following a non-operative approach was similar (IMS: 31.2% vs. 35.4% in the IC group, p = 0.169). Furthermore, 81.2% of non-operatively managed IMS patients (13 out of 16) did not require a surgical intervention at the end of the follow-up, with similar findings in the IC group (78/96, 81.2%, p = 0.148).

CONCLUSION

Medical treatment of immunosuppressed patients during their first ALCD episode associated with an abscess is feasible, with a high success rate and results comparable with the IC group. Moreover, taking into account the readmission rates, the need for emergent surgery of the recurrence, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity in the IMS group, conservative management with no differed scheduled surgery seems to be a safe option in this subgroup of patients.

Diverticulitis: A Review of Current and Emerging Practice-Changing Evidence

Acute diverticulitis represents a common colorectal emergency seen in the Western world. Over time, management of this condition has evolved. This review aims to highlight recent evidence and update current recommendations. Notable evidence has emerged in certain aspects of diverticulitis. This includes disease pathogenesis, as emerging data suggest a potentially greater role for the microbiome and genetic predisposition than previously thought. Acute management has also seen major shifts, where traditional antibiotic treatment may no longer be necessary for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Following successful medical management of acute diverticulitis, indications for elective sigmoidectomy have decreased. The benefit of emergency surgery remains for peritonitis, sepsis, obstruction, and acute diverticulitis in certain immunocompromised patients. Routine colonoscopy, once recommended after all acute diverticulitis episodes, has been shown to be beneficial for cancer exclusion in a distinct patient population. Despite advances in research, certain entities remain poorly understood, such as smoldering diverticulitis and symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. As research in the field expands, paradigm shifts will shape our understanding of diverticulitis, influencing how clinicians approach management and educate patients.

Current Trends in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis

Introduction: Acute diverticulitis represents a significant disease burden in the United States and developed world. This article examines current trends in the treatment of acute diverticulitis and concentrates on the utility of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated cases managed in the outpatient setting. Methods: The literature was reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to discern the best practice and recommendations for antibiotics for diverticulitis. The time period included relevant RCTs after 2000. Results: Four recent RCTs examine the use of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. The AVOD study was an RCT that managed inpatients with either antibiotics or IV fluids alone and demonstrated non-inferiority of non-antibiotic management with respect to recovery, complication rates, or recurrence. The DIABLO trial randomized first episodes of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis admitted to the hospital with antibiotics or supportive care and found no difference in morbidity or mortality between the two groups and longer hospital stay for patients treated with antibiotics. The DINAMO study examined outpatients managed with antibiotics by mouth or without and found no difference in morbidity in 90 day follow-up. The STAND study was the only of these four to use a placebo and found no difference between hospital stay or other adverse events at 30 days. In response to this, the ASCRS, AAFP and other societies now recommend against the routine use of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Conclusions: Several quality studies found similar outcomes in cases of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis treated with or without antibiotics. Based on these findings, societal guidelines do not recommend routine antibiotics for acute diverticulitis.

Colouterine Fistula: A Rare Presentation of Severe Diverticular Disease

Colouterine fistula as a sequela of diverticulitis is an extremely rare complication due to the extraordinarily thick layer of myometrium of the uterus. Because of this, an aggressive clinical evaluation is required to rule out other potential causes of fistula formation such as malignancy. However, imaging and laboratory techniques may be inconclusive, and surgery with pathologic analysis may be required for a definitive diagnosis. The case presented here illustrates the atypical presentation of a 63-year-old woman with acutely symptomatic, severely extensive diverticular disease with resultant colouterine fistula. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, sigmoidectomy with end colostomy, appendectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Eventually, she was discharged with an excellent prognosis and had an uneventful recovery. This case is being presented because of the rarity of the disease course as well as the complexity of the decision-making and surgical approach that resulted in patient recovery.

Robotic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticular Disease

Introduction: Historically, colon resection was recommended after one episode of complicated diverticulitis. However, current trends favor a more individualized approach. This review examines elective sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis as well as robotic approaches for diverticular disease. Methods: The literature was reviewed for timely (post 2000) and relevant articles regarding robotics and diverticulitis. The articles included large prospective series, retrospective analysis, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials. Results: Primary anastomosis with or without protective ileostomy has emerged as an alternative to the Hartman's procedure in emergent or urgent surgery in patients without significant comorbidities. Elective sigmoidectomy after an episode of complicated diverticulitis should be decided on a case-by-case basis considering patient characteristics, continued subacute symptoms, complications from the disease, and chance of recurrence episodes. Conclusions: There are several variations techniques for robotic sigmoidectomy outlined in this article, and familiarity with all can help depending on the logistics of the case. Minimally invasive colectomy provides superior patient satisfaction and outcomes.

A novel scoring system for predicting disease severity without CT imaging in acute diverticulitis

PURPOSE

Clinical scoring could help physicians identify patients with suspected acute diverticulitis who would benefit from further evaluation using computed tomography imaging. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for complicated acute diverticulitis and create a risk score to predict disease severity in acute diverticulitis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CT-verified acute diverticulitis between 2015 and 2017 were included. Data on patients' clinical and laboratory findings and medical histories were collected retrospectively. Risk factors for complicated acute diverticulitis were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Continuous laboratory values were categorised by cut-off points determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Acute Diverticulitis Severity Score was formulated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the total 513 patients included in the study, 449 (88%) had UAD, and 64 (12%) had CAD. Older age, significant comorbidities, C-reactive protein level, leucocyte count, vomiting, and body temperature were found to be independently associated with a higher risk for CAD. The novel Acute Diverticulitis Severity Score could reliably detect patients with CAD. The area under the ROC curve was 0.856 (p < 0.001) in discriminating disease severity. While higher scores indicate radiological studies, patients with low scores face an almost non-existent risk for complicated disease, making such studies possibly redundant.

CONCLUSIONS

The Acute Diverticulitis Severity Score accurately separated patients with uncomplicated disease from those at risk for complicated disease. This score can be applied in daily clinical practice to select patients requiring further investigation, consequently reducing healthcare costs and burdens.

Outpatient Management Protocol for Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: A 3-Year Monocentric Experience in a Tertiary Hospital

Background/Objectives: The management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) has shifted towards outpatient care in the last decade, challenging the traditional inpatient approach. We aimed to analyze the safety and feasibility of a structured outpatient treatment pathway for AUD in a tertiary hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort analysis of patients who underwent outpatient management for AUD at the Geneva University Hospitals from 2019 to 2021. Patient demographics, selection criteria, treatment protocols, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Two-hundred and twenty patients were included in the outpatient cohort. Four patients (1.8%) required hospitalization due to the failure of outpatient management, whereas the majority of patients (116 patients, 98.2%) experienced a successful resolution of their symptoms without hospitalization. In a univariate analysis, factors associated with treatment failure included elevated white blood cell counts at admission (14 G/l vs. 10.6 G/l, p = 0.049) and the first follow-up appointment, (10.7 G/l vs. 7.4 G/l, p = 0.011) and the presence of free air on their CT scan (25% vs. 2,3%, p = 0.033). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of free air was the only identified risk factor for unsuccessful outpatient management (p = 0.05). We observed high rates of follow-up compliance (99.1%). Conclusion: Under the condition of a warranted outpatient follow-up appointment and with adequate selection criteria, outpatient management appears to be an effective approach for most patients with AUD, emphasizing the importance of tailored therapeutic interventions and vigilant clinical assessments for optimal outcomes.

From evidence to practice: real-world insights into outpatient management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Diverticulitis is experiencing a significant increase in prevalence and its widespread in-hospital management results in a high burden on healthcare systems worldwide. This study compared inpatient and outpatient approach of acute non-complicated diverticulitis using a non-selected population in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study included all consecutive patients from two Portuguese institutions diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2021 with non-complicated diverticulitis according to the modified Hinchey Classification. The primary endpoints were to identify criteria for inpatient treatment and compare the outcomes on the basis of the treatment regimen. The secondary endpoints were to determine the predictive factors for clinical outcomes, focusing on treatment failure, pain recurrence, and the need for elective surgery following the initial episode.

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients were included in this study, 437 treated as outpatients and 251 hospitalized. Inpatient management was significantly associated with higher preadmission American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.004), fever (p = 0.030), leukocytosis (p < 0.001), and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001). No significant association was found between failure of conservative treatment and patient's age, ASA score, baseline CRP, presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and inpatient or outpatient treatment regimen. Pain recurrence was significantly associated with higher CRP levels (p = 0.049), inpatient treatment regime (p = 0.009) and post index episode mesalazine prescription (p = 0.006). Moreover, the need for elective surgery was significantly associated with the presence of previous episodes (p = 0.004) and pain recurrence (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis of the left colon experience successful conservative approach and can be safely managed in an ambulatory setting. Neither treatment failure, recurrence of pain, or need for posterior elective surgery are associated with outpatient treatment regimen.

Follow-Up Colonoscopy for Detection of Missed Colorectal Cancer After Diverticulitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colonoscopy often is recommended after an episode of diverticulitis to exclude missed colorectal cancer (CRC). This is a controversial recommendation based on limited evidence. We estimated the prevalence and odds of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia on colonoscopy in patients with diverticulitis compared with CRC screening.

METHODS

Using data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium registry, we performed a cross-sectional study with patients ≥40 years old undergoing outpatient colonoscopy for an indication of diverticulitis follow-up evaluation or CRC screening. The primary outcome was CRC. The secondary outcome was advanced colorectal neoplasia. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 4,591,921 outpatient colonoscopies performed for screening and 91,993 colonoscopies for diverticulitis follow-up evaluation. CRC prevalence was 0.33% in colonoscopies for screening and 0.31% in colonoscopies for diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). CRC prevalence decreased to 0.17% in colonoscopies performed for diverticulitis only. Compared with screening, patients with diverticulitis as the only indication were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.68). CRC prevalence increased to 1.43% in patients with complicated diverticulitis. Compared with screening, patients with complicated diverticulitis were more likely to have CRC (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.59-8.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of CRC cancer is low in most patients with diverticulitis. Patients with complicated diverticulitis are the exception. Our results suggest that colonoscopy to detect missed CRC should include diverticulitis patients with a complication and those not current with CRC screening.

Predicting complicated acute diverticulitis with the HALP score: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

HALP score is a scoring system consisting of hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet. It is different from other prognostic markers because it provides information about both inflammation and immunonutrition status. This study aims to evaluate the severity of the disease and the level of prognosis in patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis.

MATERIAL METHODS

190 patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis between January 2017 and June 2023 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two separate groups according to the Hinchey classification. The prognostic effect of inflammatory markers and HALP score was examined.

RESULT

The median values of C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, HALP score, and hospitalization duration were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with complicated diverticulitis than in those diagnosed with uncomplicated diverticulitis. (p < 0.001, p = 0.045, p = 0.004, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The distinguishing feature of the HALP score in predicting the complexity of the diagnosis of diverticulitis was evaluated using ROC analysis. Area Under Curve (AUC) value was found to be 0.723 (p < 0.001). According to the ROC curve, the sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off value of HALP score ≤44.1 were 66.7 % and 75.0 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HALP score is an inexpensive parameter that can be used safely to determine the severity and prognosis of acute diverticulitis.

Prospective study about the security and efficacy of treatment without antibiotic therapy of patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis after launching a protocol at a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of our study is to analyze the results in our hospital after launching a treatment protocol without antibiotic therapy for patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

METHODS

Our observational, prospective, single-center study was developed after launching a treatment protocol without antibiotic therapy for patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) in January 2021. The follow-up period was from January 1, 2021 to September 30, 2023. Variables evaluated by the study have included demographic and analytical variables, as well as those related to diagnosis and whether the patients needed to start antibiotic treatment, inpatient treatment, or surgical procedures.

RESULTS

In total, 199 patients were diagnosed with AUD, 75 of whom were treated without antibiotic therapy as outpatients. Seven of these patients needed to start antibiotic treatment because of adverse evolution; none of these patients required surgical procedures. The need for inpatient treatment, urgent care, or surgical procedures is similar to the group of patients treated with antibiotics. The main risk factor of failure of outpatient treatment without antibiotic therapy identified by the study was the presence of bacteriuria at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm previous reports, observing that treatment without antibiotic therapy in selected patients with AUD is safe.

Effectiveness of Treatment with Antibiotics Alone in Patients with Acute Diverticulitis and Pelvic Abscesses

Introduction: The available evidence regarding the treatment of acute diverticulitis (AD) with pelvic abscess using antibiotics alone is very limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether the short- and long-term outcomes of AD with pelvic abscesses treated exclusively with antibiotics are comparable to those of pericolic abscesses. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with AD and either pelvic or pericolic abscesses, as confirmed by computed tomography, who were treated solely with antibiotic therapy between 2011 and 2021. Cases involving percutaneous drainage as part of conservative treatment were excluded. Results: Fifty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising 12 with pelvic abscesses and 46 with pericolic abscesses. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics and radiological findings, except for a more frequent presence of free fluid in pelvic abscesses. The success rate of antibiotic therapy was 91.7% for pelvic abscess cases and 96.7% for pericolic cases (p = 0.508). No significant differences were observed in recurrence or elective surgery. In the subgroup of abscesses with a diameter ≥4 cm, the evolution was similar in both locations (treatment success rate of 87.5% in pelvic and 94.4% in pericolic; p = 0.529), although recurrence was slightly higher for pericolic abscesses (38.4% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.362). Conclusions: Antibiotic therapy alone proves to be effective and safe for pelvic abscesses, demonstrating a course similar to pericolic abscesses, even in the case of large abscesses. Although the analyzed patient cohort is small, this study provides additional evidence that percutaneous drainage is not always essential for treating this complication.

Acute diverticulitis management: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

Acute diverticulitis (AD) is associated with relevant morbidity/mortality and is increasing worldwide, thus becoming a major issue for national health systems. AD may be challenging, as clinical relevance varies widely, ranging from asymptomatic picture to life-threatening conditions, with continuously evolving diagnostic tools, classifications, and management. A 33-item-questionnaire was administered to residents and surgeons to analyze the actual clinical practice and to verify the real spread of recent recommendations, also by stratifying surgeons by experience. CT-scan remains the mainstay of AD assessment, including cases presenting with recurrent mild episodes or women of child-bearing age. Outpatient management of mild AD is slowly gaining acceptance. A conservative management is preferred in non-severe cases with extradigestive air or small/non-radiologically drainable abscesses. In severe cases, a laparoscopic approach is preferred, with a non-negligible number of surgeons confident in performing emergency complex procedures. Surgeons are seemingly aware of several options during emergency surgery for AD, since the rate of Hartmann procedures does not exceed 50% in most environments and damage control surgery is spreading in life-threatening cases. Quality of life and history of complicated AD are the main indications for delayed colectomy, which is mostly performed avoiding the proximal vessel ligation, mobilizing the splenic flexure and performing a colorectal anastomosis. ICG is spreading to check anastomotic stumps' vascularization. Differences between the two experience groups were found about the type of investigation to exclude colon cancer (considering the experience only in terms of number of colectomies performed), the size of the peritoneal abscess to be drained, practice of damage control surgery and the attitude towards colovesical fistula.

Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature

BACKGROUNDS

Laparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).

RESULTS

36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.

Acute diverticulitis: beyond the diagnosis: predictive role of CT in assessing risk of recurrence and clinical implications in non-operative management of acute diverticulitis

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to identify CT findings that are predictive of recurrence of acute uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis, to better risk-stratify these patients for whom guidelines recommend a conservative outpatient treatment and to determine the appropriate management with an improvement of health costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over the past year, 33 patients enrolled in an outpatient integrated care pathway (PDTA) for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis with 1-year follow-up period, without recurrence, and 33 patients referred to Emergency Department for a recurrent acute diverticulitis were included. Images of admission CT were reviewed by two radiologists and the imaging features were analyzed and compared with Chi-square and Student t tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were employed to identify parameters that significantly predicted recurrence in 1-year follow-up period and establish cutoff and recurrence-free rates. The maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS) were used to identify the optimal wall thickening cutoff for the prediction of recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with recurrence showed a greater mean parietal thickness compared to the group without recurrence (16 mm vs. 11.5 mm; HR 1.25, p < 0.001) and more evidence of grade 4 of peridiverticular inflammation (40% vs. 12%, p = 0.009, HR 3.44). 12-month recurrence-free rates progressively decrease with increasing thickness and inflammation. In multivariate analysis, only parietal thickness maintained its predictive power with an optimal cutpoint > 15 mm that causes a sixfold increased risk of recurrence (HR 6.22; 95% CI, 3.05-12.67; p < 0.001). Beyond thickness and peridiverticular inflammation, predictive value of early recurrence within 90 days from the 1st episode resulted also an Hinchey Ib on admission CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum wall thickening and the grade of peridiverticular inflammation can be considered as predictive factors of recurrence and may be helpful in selecting patients for a tailored treatment to prevent the risk of recurrence.

Clinical relevance of the 3-cm threshold in sigmoid diverticulitis with abscess: consensus or quandary?

PURPOSE

Diverticular abscess is a common manifestation of acute complicated diverticulitis. We aimed to analyze the clinical course of patients with diverticular abscess initially treated conservatively.

METHODS

All patients with diverticular abscess undergoing elective or urgent/emergency surgery from October 2004 to October 2022 were identified from our institutional database. Depending on the abscess size, patients were divided into group A (≤ 3 cm) and group B (> 3 cm). Conservative treatment failure was defined as clinical deterioration, persistent or recurrent abscess, or urgent/emergency surgery. Baseline characteristics and short-term perioperative outcomes were recorded and compared between both groups. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify determinants of conservative treatment failure and overall ostomy formation.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were enrolled into group A (n = 73) and group B (n = 32). Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed abscess size as the only significant factor of conservative therapy failure [OR 9.904; p < 0.0001], while overall ostomy formation was significantly affected by an increased body mass index (BMI) [OR 1.366; p = 0.026]. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome with the exception of a longer total hospital stay in patients managed with abscess drainage compared to antibiotics alone prior surgery in group B (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Abscess diameter > 3 cm is not just an arbitrary chosen cut-off value for drainage placement but has a prognostic impact on medical treatment failure in patients with complicated acute diverticulitis. In this subgroup, the choice between primary drainage and antibiotics does not appear to influence outcome at the cost of prolonged hospital stay after drainage insertion.

Stenosis of the colorectal anastomosis after surgery for diverticulitis: A national retrospective cohort study

AIM

The aim of this work was to investigate the association between early postoperative anastomotic leakage or pelvic abscess (AL/PA) and symptomatic anastomotic stenosis (SAS) in patients after surgery for left colonic diverticulitis.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study based on a national cohort of diverticulitis surgery patients carried out by the Association Française de Chirurgie. The assessment was performed using path analyses. The database included 7053 patients operated on for colonic diverticulitis, with surgery performed electively or in an emergency, by open access or laparoscopically. Patients were excluded from the study analysis where there was (i) right-sided diverticulitis (the initial database included all consecutive patients operated on for colonic diverticulitis), (ii) no anastomosis was performed during the first procedure or (iii) missing information about stenosis, postoperative abscess or anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

Of the 4441 patients who were included in the final analysis, AL/PA occurred in 327 (4.6%) and SAS occurred in 82 (1.8%). AL/PA was a significant independent factor associated with a risk for occurrence of SAS (OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.75-6.66), as was the case for diverting stoma for ≥100 days (OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.32-5.82), while central vessel ligation proximal to the inferior mesenteric artery was associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.19-0.88). Diverting stoma created for <100 days or ≥100 days was also a factor associated with a risk for AL/PA (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 2-4.75 and OR = 12.95, 95% CI = 9.11-18.50). Interestingly, no significant association between radiological drainage or surgical management of AL/PA and SAS could be highlighted.

CONCLUSION

AL/PA was an independent factor associated with the risk for SAS. The treatment of AL/PA was not associated with the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis. Diverting stoma was associated with an increased risk of both AL/PA and SAS, especially if it was left for ≥100 days. Physicians must be aware of this information in order to decide on the best course of action when creating a stoma during elective or emergency surgery.

Trends in the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy for acute complicated diverticulitis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Acute complicated diverticulitis poses a substantial burden to individual patients and the health care system. A significant proportion of the cases necessitate emergency operations. The choice between Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy remains controversial.

METHODS

Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient user file data from 2012 to 2020, patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for nonelective sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis were identified. Major adverse events, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, operative duration, reoperation, and 30-day readmissions were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 16,921 cases, 6.3% underwent primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, showing a rising trend from 5.3% in 2012 to 8.4% in 2020. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy patients, compared to Hartmann's procedure, had similar demographics and fewer severe comorbidities. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy exhibited lower rates of major adverse events (24.6% vs 29.3%, P = .001). After risk adjustment, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy had similar risks of major adverse events and 30-day mortality compared to Hartmann's procedure. While having lower odds of respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.83) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93) complications, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a 36-minute increment in operative duration and increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.57) compared to Hartmann's procedure.

CONCLUSION

Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy displayed comparable odds of major adverse events compared to Hartmann's procedure in acute complicated diverticulitis while mitigating infectious and respiratory complication risks. However, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with longer operative times and greater odds of 30-day readmission. Evolving guidelines and increasing primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy use suggest a shift favoring primary anastomosis, especially in complicated diverticulitis. Future investigation of disparities in surgical approaches and patient outcomes is warranted to optimize acute diverticulitis care pathways.

The role of procalcitonin as a risk stratification tool of severity, prognosis, and need for surgery in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Imaging-based classifications do not always reflect the clinical severity and prognosis of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. This study aims to investigate the role of an early procalcitonin assessment in the emergency department as a risk stratification tool for severity, prognosis, and need for surgery in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients consecutively admitted from January 2015 to September 2020 for acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis and having a procalcitonin determination at admission were enrolled. The following data were collected: age, sex, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, level of urgency, clinical presentation, type of treatment, complications, and post-management outcomes. The association between the procalcitonin value at admission and the following endpoints was analyzed: type of treatment, classification of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis, mortality, and type of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 503 consecutive patients were enrolled. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL emerged as an independent risk factor for complicated acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (P = .007). Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .033), together with a history of complicated acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (P < .001), abdominal pain (P = .04), bowel perforation (P < .001), and peritonitis (P < .001), was a significant risk factor for surgery. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .007) and peritonitis (P = .03) emerged as independent risk factors for sigmoidectomy without colorectal anastomosis. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .004), a higher level of urgency at admission (P = .005), Hartmann's procedure (P = .002), and the necessity of mechanical ventilation (P = .004) emerged as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Procalcitonin >0.05 ng/mL at emergency department admission is a useful risk stratification tool for severity, prognosis, and need for surgical treatment in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis.

Current diagnosis and management of acute colonic diverticulitis: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Acute colonic diverticulitis is a common disease treated by acute care surgeons. Acute uncomplicated colonic diverticulitis involves thickening of the colon wall with inflammatory changes and less commonly requires the expertise of a surgeon; many cases may be treated as an outpatient with or without antibiotics. Complicated diverticulitis involves phlegmon, abscess, peritonitis, obstruction, stricture, and/or fistula and usually requires inpatient hospital admission, treatment with antibiotics, and consideration for intervention including operative management. This review will discuss what the acute care surgeon needs to know about diagnosis and management of acute colonic diverticulitis.

Does surgery improve quality of life in patients with ongoing- or recurrent diverticulitis; a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recurrences or persistent symptoms after an initial episode of diverticulitis are common, yet surgical treatment is rarely performed. Current guidelines lack clear recommendations on whether or not to operate, even though recent studies suggest an improved quality of life following surgery. The aim of this study is therefore to compare quality of life in patients with recurrent or ongoing diverticulitis treated conservatively versus surgically, giving a more definitive answer to the question of whether or not to operate on these patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane. Only comparative studies reporting on quality of life were included. Statistical analysis included calculation of weighted mean differences and pooled odds ratios.

RESULTS

Five studies were included; two RCT's and three retrospective observational studies. Compared to conservative treatment, the SF-36 scores were higher in the surgically treated group at each follow-up moment but only the difference in SF-36 physical scores at six months follow-up was statistically significant (MD 6.02, 95%CI 2.62-9.42). GIQLI scores were also higher in the surgical group with a MD of 14.01 (95%CI 8.15-19.87) at six months follow-up and 7.42 (95%CI 1.23-12.85) at last available follow-up. Also, at last available follow-up, significantly fewer recurrences occurred in the surgery group (OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.05-0.23, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although surgery for recurrent diverticulitis is not without risk, it might improve long-term quality of life in patients suffering from recurrent- or ongoing diverticulitis when compared to conservative treatment. Therefore, it should be considered in this patient group.

Results of surgical treatment of patients with acute destructive diverticulitis of the colon using minimally invasive technologies

Among the diseases of the colon, diverticular disease occupies one of the leading positions, the frequency of which is currently 1.2 cases per 1000 people. Complications in this condition develop in 5% of cases and account for 3-5% of all patients with acute abdominal diseases. Surgical intervention is required in 15% to 30% of such patients. The mortality rate after surgical treatment of acute complications of the diverticular disease remains high, ranging from 7% to 25%. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes in the treatment of patients with acute destructive diverticulitis of the colon using traditional surgical treatment versus minimally invasive technologies. In the study, 114 patients diagnosed with acute destructive diverticulitis were examined. Group I consisted of 56 patients who underwent initial surgical interventions employing minimally invasive methods like laparoscopy, laparoscopic-assisted techniques, or percutaneous drainage guided by ultrasound. Group II comprised 58 patients who underwent the first surgical intervention through laparotomy access. The data of our study show that the overall proportion of patients with complications was higher in Group II – 20 (34.5%) compared to 6 (10.1%) in Group I (p=0.005). The application of diverse surgical methods did not notably impact the mortality rate, with 6 (10.3%) fatalities in Group II compared to 2 (3.6%) in Group I (p=0.2). Stoma creation was more frequent in Group II, in 40 (67%) patients, whereas in Group I, the occurrence of stomas was lower, in 15 (25.9%) cases. The average period to stoma closure was 5 months in Group II and 2 months in Group I. There was observed a decrease in the time of urgent surgery from 143±13.5 minutes in Group II to 65.7±15.2 minutes in Group I (p<0.01) and the duration of the first hospitalization from 14.2±1.8 days to 5.6±0.7 days, accordingly (p<0.01). When dealing with primary anastomosis or severe peritonitis, utilizing a laparoscope for dynamic laparoscopy allows for real-time monitoring of the abdominal cavity and early identification of complications, eliminating the need for scheduled laparostomy. The research data demonstrate that, while not affecting mortality, minimally invasive methods have several significant advantages, including a reduction in the number of complications, a decrease in the proportion of patients with stomas, a reduction in the time to reconstructive surgery, and a decrease in the duration of urgent surgery and the length of hospitalization.

Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD) - assessment of the intra- and interobserver agreement in abdominal CT scans

PURPOSE

Along with ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) is one of the imaging modalities of choice in patients with suspected diverticular disease (DD). Recently, a newer Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD) has been proposed. However, its reliability in daily radiological practice has never been proven. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement of the CDD in abdominal CT scans.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 481 CT scans of patients with suspected DD were included. Two readers (one board-certified radiologist with 6 years of experience, one 3 rd year radiology resident) individually evaluated all CTs in two reading sessions using the CDD. A composite endpoint of a prior consensus reading, follow-up, and intraoperative findings served as the reference. Intra- and interobserver agreement were calculated using Cohen-k statistic.

RESULTS

DD was present in 317 cases (66 %), mostly classified as CDD stage 0, 1b, and 2a (28 %, 30 %, und 14 %). Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect for both readers (kappa 0.93 and 0.88). Interobserver agreement was high and improved from substantial (kappa 0.77) in the first reading session to almost perfect (kappa 0.84) in the second reading session. The interobserver agreement was best for CDD types 0 (diverticulosis) and 2c (free perforated diverticulitis) (mean kappa 0.83 and 0.86) and poorest for CDD types 1a (diverticulitis without phlegmon) and 2b (covered diverticulitis with macroabscess) (mean kappa 0.17 and 0.38). Intra- and interobserver agreement of acute uncomplicated (CDD type 1) and acute complicated diverticulitis (CDD type 2) were substantial to almost perfect (mean kappa 0.63-0.86). Agreement with the reference was almost perfect for both observers (mean kappa 0.86 and 0.82). Administration of rectal contrast did not significantly improve the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The CDD is a classification based on relatively clear imaging characteristics, which can be readily applied by radiologists with different expertise. In our study, the CDD had a high intra- and interobserver agreement, enabling a reliable therapy-related categorization of DD.

KEY POINTS

· The Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD) is an easy-to-use classification for diverticular disease based on relatively clear image features.. · The CDD can be applied equally by radiologists with different levels of experience in the clinical routine.. · The high intra- and interobserver agreement indicates high reliability in the therapy-relevant classification of diverticulitis on CT..

CITATION FORMAT

· Schmidbauer M, Levers A, Wacker FK et al. Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD) - assessment of the intra- and interobserver agreement in abdominal CT scans. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 591 - 599.

Towards a tailored approach for patients with acute diverticulitis and abscess formation. The DivAbsc2023 multicentre case-control study

BACKGROUND

This multicentre case-control study aimed to identify risk factors associated with non-operative treatment failure for patients with CT scan Hinchey Ib-IIb and WSES Ib-IIa diverticular abscesses.

METHODS

This study included a cohort of adult patients experiencing their first episode of CT-diagnosed diverticular abscess, all of whom underwent initial non-operative treatment comprising either antibiotics alone or in combination with percutaneous drainage. The cohort was stratified based on the outcome of non-operative treatment, specifically identifying those who required emergency surgical intervention as cases of treatment failure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors associated with the failure of non-operative treatment was employed.

RESULTS

Failure of conservative treatment occurred for 116 patients (27.04%). CT scan Hinchey classification IIb (aOR 2.54, 95%CI 1.61;4.01, P < 0.01), tobacco smoking (aOR 2.01, 95%CI 1.24;3.25, P < 0.01), and presence of air bubbles inside the abscess (aOR 1.59, 95%CI 1.00;2.52, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of failure. In the subgroup of patients with abscesses > 5 cm, percutaneous drainage was not associated with the risk of failure or success of the non-operative treatment (aOR 2.78, 95%CI - 0.66;3.70, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-operative treatment is generally effective for diverticular abscesses. Tobacco smoking's role as an independent risk factor for treatment failure underscores the need for targeted behavioural interventions in diverticular disease management. IIb Hinchey diverticulitis patients, particularly young smokers, require vigilant monitoring due to increased risks of treatment failure and septic progression. Further research into the efficacy of image-guided percutaneous drainage should involve randomized, multicentre studies focussing on homogeneous patient groups.