Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924

Significance of Body Surface Area Correction for Cisplatin Eligibility Based on Renal Function of Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Creatinine clearance (CCr) ≥60 mL/min without body surface area (BSA) correction is commonly applied to determine the cisplatin (CDDP) eligibility of patients with bladder cancer. However, since CDDP dosages are calculated according to BSA, there is concern that applying renal function without BSA correction may underestimate CDDP eligibility, especially of patients with low BSA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether BSA correction for renal function affects the decision of CDDP eligibility and oncological outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of 294 patients who received platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and underwent radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with BSA below and above the median BSA value (1.70 m2) were divided into low-BSA and high-BSA groups. Patients who received ≥20% dose reduction of CDDP or replacement by carboplatin at the first NAC cycle were categorized as "inadequate-CDDP" recipients. "CDDP-eligibility underestimation" was defined as CCr with BSA correction >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 while CCr without BSA correction <60 mL/min. The association of BSA with inadequate-CDDP was evaluated using multivariate analysis. Additionally, differences in clinical outcomes, namely cancer-specific survival (CSS) and objective response rate (ORR) to NAC, between the low- and high-BSA groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

CDDP-eligibility underestimation was more frequent in the low-BSA group than in the high-BSA group (17% vs. 0%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that low-BSA was independently associated with the risk of inadequate CDDP (odds ratio, 2.07; P = .012). CSS from initiation of NAC was significantly shorter in the low-BSA group than in the high-BSA group (hazard ratio, 2.24; P = .002). The ORR for NAC was also significantly lower in the low-BSA group (40.8% vs. 57.1%; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

When determining CDDP eligibility for renal function in patients with low BSA, renal function values corrected by standard BSA should be applied to prevent inappropriate dosing reductions.

Evaluation of Optimal Sequential Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have provided a comprehensive analysis of sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). This study assessed treatment patterns, prognostic factors, and optimal sequencing strategies in patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1 L-PBC).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 212 la/mUC patients who initiated 1 L-PBC. Treatment sequences were categorized based on the therapy, including immune-oncology (IO) drug and enfortumab vedotin (EV) therapy. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for failing to progress to EV therapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 17 months. Of the 212 patients, 65 (38.9%) progressed to EV therapy, achieving the longest median overall survival (OS) of 41 months, compared to 25 months in the 1 L-PBC + IO group and 8 months in the 1 L-PBC group. Poor performance status (ECOG-PS ≥ 1), age ≥ 80 years, and elevated levels of C-reactive protein (≥ 1) were significant predictors of failing to reach EV therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no survival difference based on avelumab use in patients with no risk factors, but patients with one or more risk factors receiving avelumab had significantly longer OS than patients who did not receive avelumab.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the prognostic importance of achieving EV therapy and the role of maintenance avelumab in improving outcomes for la/mUC patients with one or more risk factors after 1 L-PBC. Combining EV with pembrolizumab is a promising first-line treatment, and 1 L-PBC remains a viable option for selected patients.

A clinical study of RC48-ADC combined with PD-1 inhibitor in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)-based on real-world data analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC combined with PD-1 inhibitors in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to explore the differences in treatment outcomes between primary and recurrent cases, as well as patients at different clinical stages.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients with clinically non-metastatic MIBC who received ≥ 3 cycles of RC48-ADC combined with PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Clinical efficacy was assessed through integrated imaging and histopathological evaluations.

RESULTS

Among the 32 patients, the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 84.4%, the objective response rate (ORR) was 68.8%, and the 1-year bladder preservation rate was 68.8%. The primary group was superior to the recurrent group in PFS (94.7% vs. 69.2%), ORR (78.9% vs. 53.8%), and 1-year bladder preservation rate (78.9% vs. 53.8%). Similarly, T2-stage patients exhibited better clinical responses than T3-stage patients in PFS (85.0% vs. 75.0%), ORR (80.0% vs. 54.5%), and 1-year bladder preservation rate (80.0% vs. 54.5%). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were predominantly grade I-II, with no severe immune-related complications reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RC48-ADC and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improves bladder preservation rates in MIBC patients with a favorable safety profile, particularly in primary and T2-stage cases. This regimen provides a personalized therapeutic strategy for patients unsuitable for conventional treatments.

The first real-world evidence on dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin followed by switch maintenance avelumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) is an established regimen for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). Although platinum-based chemotherapy, typically gemcitabine and cisplatin, followed by switch maintenance avelumab has been a recommended strategy for aUC, no study has evaluated outcomes of dd-MVAC followed by avelumab therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed 71 patients treated with first-line dd-MVAC for aUC at two university hospitals between 2018 and 2024. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed as endpoints. Additionally, among patients who achieved ≥ stable disease, we performed propensity score matching between patients with and without avelumab to balance their background characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 71 patients, 49 (69%) experienced disease progression and 30 (42%) died during the median follow-up of 13 months. Median OS and PFS were 24 and 7 months, respectively. Among 59 patients who achieved ≥ stable disease after completion of dd-MVAC, 35 received switch maintenance avelumab, while the remaining 24 did not. After propensity score matching, patients with avelumab had significantly longer OS and PFS (both: not reached) than those without (OS: 28 months; PFS: 7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

We herein report outcomes of dd-MVAC followed by switch maintenance avelumab in real-world patients with aUC for the first time. Avelumab therapy was significantly associated with longer survival in patients who achieved ≥ stable disease after first-line dd-MVAC. Given the excellent survival outcomes, dd-MVAC followed by switch maintenance avelumab may still be a valid option for aUC even in the new treatment paradigm as typified by enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab.

Optimization of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin therapy for Japanese patients with urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) regimen has been established as a systemic chemotherapy for patients with urothelial carcinoma. However, it is rarely used in Japan owing to the challenges associated with managing the related adverse events. This study aimed to optimize the dd-MVAC protocol for Japanese patients.

METHODS

Criteria were developed to adjust the doses of anticancer drugs used in dd-MVAC. In this regimen, the initial cycle of methotrexate and cisplatin was administered at 75% of the full dose. Patients who did not experience significant toxicities during the first cycle subsequently received the full dose starting from the second cycle. Additionally, the doses of methotrexate and cisplatin were adjusted according to the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance. Based on these criteria, patients with urothelial carcinoma underwent dd-MVAC between August 2018 and May 2023, and all patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients received dd-MVAC, with 36, 15, and 35 patients receiving it as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and salvage chemotherapy, respectively. Fifty-nine patients (68.6%) completed the six scheduled cycles. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were observed in 76 (88.4%) patients; however, most were manageable. In the neoadjuvant cohort, the pathological complete response rate was 52.2% among patients with clinical N0 lower tract urothelial carcinoma. High levels of alkaline phosphatase at the initiation of treatment were correlated with failure to complete six cycles of dd-MVAC.

CONCLUSION

Adjusting the dd-MVAC regimen based on renal function and significant adverse events may result in a high completion rate of scheduled treatments in Japanese patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in older patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin therapy for a cohort of older Japanese patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma compared to younger patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with enfortumab vedotin and recruited between April 2019 and February 2023. Older patients were defined as being ≥75 years old. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates between groups. Adverse events and relative dose intensity were also compared. Moreover, the prognostic factor for overall survival in the entire cohort was evaluated using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients treated with enfortumab vedotin, 37 were younger and 20 were older, (median ages of 67.6 and 79.2, respectively). Median overall survival in older and younger patients was 407 and 365 days, respectively (P = 0.48). The objective response rate was 60.0 % and 54 % (P = 0.68) and median progression-free survival 228 and 223 days in older and younger patients, respectively (P = 0.76). Adverse events were equivalent between groups except for liver dysfunction, which frequently occurred in younger patients. The dose intensity for the older and younger patients did not differ (65.7 % vs. 63.5 %, P = 0.37, respectively). In multivariate analysis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of 3 or more was the only risk factor for worse overall survival in the entire cohort (P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

Our data demonstrated that enfortumab vedotin therapy can benefit older patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma equivalent to younger patients without compromising safety profiles.

Ophthalmologic toxicities of antineoplastic agents in genitourinary cancers: Mechanisms, management, and clinical implications

Genitourinary cancers affect over 480,000 patients in the United States annually. While promising therapeutic modalities continue to emerge, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, molecular targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, and radioligand therapies, these treatments are associated with a spectrum of adverse side-effects, including ophthalmologic toxicities. In this review, we cover the most commonly used antineoplastic agents for the kidneys, bladder, urinary tracts, prostate, testis, and penis, detailing mechanism, indication, and recent trials supporting their use. For each category of antineoplastic therapy, we describe the epidemiology, management, and clinical presentation, of common ophthalmologic toxicities stemming from these agents. This review serves to augment awareness and recognition of possible ophthalmologic manifestations resulting from the use of antineoplastic agents in genitourinary malignancy. Early identification of these side effects can hasten ophthalmology referral and ultimately improve visual outcomes in patients experiencing medication-induced ocular toxicities.

siRNA-based therapy for overcoming drug resistance in human solid tumours; molecular and immunological approaches

RNA interference (RNAi) is a primordial biological process that protects against external intrusion. SiRNA has the potential to selectively silence disease-related genes in a sequence-specific way, thus offering a promising therapeutic approach. The efficacy of siRNA-based therapies in cancer treatment has gained significant recognition due to multiple studies demonstrating its ability to effectively suppress cancer cells' growth and multiplication. Moreover, siRNA-based medicines have shown considerable promise in enhancing the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy and other treatment methods by suppressing genes that play a role in the development of drug resistance. Exploring and identifying functional genes linked to cancer cell characteristics and drug resistance is crucial for developing effective siRNAs for cancer treatment and advancing targeted and personalized therapeutics. Targeting and silencing genes in charge of resistance mechanisms, such as those involved in drug efflux, cell survival, or DNA repair, is possible with siRNA therapy in the context of drug resistance, especially cancer. Through inhibiting these genes, siRNA therapy can prevent resistance and restore the efficacy of traditional medications. This review addresses the potential of siRNAs in addressing drug resistance in human tumours, opening up new possibilities in cancer therapy. This review article offers a non-systematic summary of how different siRNA types contribute to cancer cells' treatment resistance. Using pertinent keywords, sources were chosen from reliable databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The review covered essential papers in this area and those that mainly addressed the function of siRNA in drug resistance. The articles examined in connection with the title of this review were primarily published from 2020 onward and are based on in vitro studies. Furthermore, this article examines the potential barriers and prospective perspectives of siRNA therapies.

Safety and Efficacy of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin with Pegfilgrastim in Japanese Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) therapy is indicated as first-line or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, no studies reported ddMVAC therapy with pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) in Japanese patients. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ddMVAC therapy with pegfilgrastim in patients with advanced or metastatic UC.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients received ddMVAC therapy with pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) from February 2021 to December 2023. Among them, 25 and 18 patients received this regimen as first-line chemotherapy and NAC, respectively. We assessed toxicity and efficacy using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, respectively.

RESULTS

The median number of ddMVAC therapy cycles was 3 (range: 1-5), with a total of 131 cycles. Cisplatin at the full dose without reduction was administered to 24 (56%) patients. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity occurred in 15 (35%) patients. Among them, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia were 13.9%, 9.3%, 11.7%, and 7.0%, respectively. Regarding non-hematologic toxicity, grade 3 appetite loss was observed in 2 (5%) patients. Complete response was observed in 7 (16%) patients and partial response in 26 patients (60%), yielding an objective response rate of 76%. Pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0pN0) was observed in 3 (16.7%) patients and downstaging occurred in 13 (72.2%) patients. The median progression-free survival and overall survival of first-line treatment with ddMVAC were 18.6 months and not reached, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ddMVAC with pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) reduced injection-related patient burden, caused fewer grade ≥3 adverse events, and demonstrated similar efficacy when compared to the original ddMVAC regimen that used granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 7 consecutive days.

Role of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Genitourinary Malignancies

Genitourinary (GU) malignancies are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In patients with localized GU cancers, surgical resection or definitive radiation remain the mainstays of treatment. Despite definitive treatment, many patients with high-risk localized disease experience recurrence. There is growing interest in using neoadjuvant immunotherapy to improve outcomes. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with localized high-risk GU cancers including renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, prostate cancer, penile squamous cell carcinoma, and testicular germ cell tumors. We also discuss ongoing clinical trials and candidate biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve treatment outcomes.

Evolving Treatment Landscape of Frontline Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights and Future Perspectives

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has long been the standard first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, up to 50% of patients with mUC may be ineligible for cisplatin owing to comorbidities, necessitating alternative primary treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a vital alternative for those unable to receive cisplatin. Nevertheless, the prognosis of advanced UC remains dire and challenges persist in optimizing 1L therapy. Recent medical advancements have redirected attention towards innovative drug combinations for the primary treatment of mUC. The combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab has shown significantly improved overall and progression-free survival rates compared to those with chemotherapy alone. This combination can be used as a 1L treatment for patients with mUC who are cisplatin-ineligible or require alternatives to standard chemotherapy. While platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be essential for many patients, the approval of EV and pembrolizumab as 1L treatments for cisplatin-ineligible patients signifies a major breakthrough in primary cancer care. These therapies offer enhanced outcomes in terms of survival and response rates and highlight the increasing relevance of ICI-containing regimens in frontline cancer care. This review provides an exhaustive overview of the current frontline treatment landscape of mUC and explores new therapeutic strategies, with the aim of facilitating clinical decision-making and guiding therapeutic strategies in patients with mUC.

SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma with an EML4::ALK fusion gene in a Japanese woman

Renal medullary carcinoma is a rare, high-grade carcinoma arising in the renal medulla, which is usually associated with sickle cell trait, and there are very few documented cases in the Japanese population. We report a case of renal medullary carcinoma, immunohistochemically defined as SMARCB1 deficient, in a 67-year-old Japanese woman without a history of sickle cell trait. Somatic mutation of SMARCB1 and an EML4::ALK fusion gene were identified by comprehensive genomic profiling. Computed tomography revealed metastatic lesions in the retrocaval lymph nodes, liver, and bronchus. Six cycles of the dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin-combined chemotherapy were completed after an ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of the renal tumor. After chemotherapy, the size of the original tumor in the right kidney had decreased in size, as well as the other metastatic lesions.

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE

The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an abridged Cochrane review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy as first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Based on a published protocol, we performed a systematic search of multiple databases. Two review authors independently performed the literature selection, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, and extracted data. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence on a per-outcome basis according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

We included five randomised controlled trials and also identified seven single-arm studies. When used as first-line therapy, immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause compared to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.07; moderate-certainty evidence). immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on health-related quality of life (mean difference [MD] 4.10, 95% CI 3.83-4.37; moderate). Immunotherapy probably reduces grade 3-5 adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; moderate). In the second-line setting immunotherapy may reduce the risk of death from any cause (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81; low). Immunotherapy may have little to no effect on health-related quality of life when compared to chemotherapy (MD 4.82, 95% CI -3.11 to 12.75; low). Immunotherapy may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97; low).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause in a first-line setting. Nevertheless, it may reduce the risk of death from any cause when used as second-line therapy. The health-related quality of life of participants receiving first- and second-line therapy does not appear to be affected by immunotherapy. Immunotherapy probably reduces or may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events when used as first- and second-line therapy, respectively.

[The metastatic and advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma-a separate entity or bladder cancer's younger sibling?]

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a cancer that is often already in an advanced stage at the time of initial diagnosis. Although urothelial carcinoma of the upper and lower urinary tracts both originate from the urothelium and have similar genetic alterations, there are significant differences in their distribution. In localized high-risk UTUC, radical nephroureterectomy is the gold standard therapy. In metastatic UTUC, major changes are emerging in sequential therapy due to the investigation of new classes of drugs. In addition to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy, new substances such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and FGFR inhibitors are used.

Hydrogel-based platforms for site-specific doxorubicin release in cancer therapy

Hydrogels are promising candidates for the delivery of therapeutics in the treatment of human cancers. Regarding to the biocomaptiiblity, high drug and encapsulation efficacy and adjustable physico-chemical features, the hydrogels have been widely utilized for the delivery of chemotherapy drugs. Doxorubicin (DOX) is one of the most common chemotherapy drugs used in cancer therapy through impairing topoisomerase II function and increasing oxidative damage. However, the tumor cells have developed resistance into DOX-mediated cytotoxic impacts, requiring the delivery systems to increase internalization and anti-cancer activity of this drug. The hydrogels can deliver DOX in a sustained manner to maximize its anti-cancer activity, improving cancer elimination and reduction in side effects and drug resistance. The natural-based hydrogels such as chitosan, alginate and gelatin hydrogels have shown favourable biocompatibility and degradability in DOX delivery for tumor suppression. The hydrogels are able to co-deliver DOX with other drugs or genes to enhance drug sensitivity and mediate polychemotherapy, synergistically suppressing cancer progression. The incorporation of nanoparticles in the structure of hydrogels can improve the sustained release of DOX and enhancing intracellular internalization, accelerating DOX's cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the stimuli-responsive hydrogels including pH-, redox- and thermo-sensitive platforms are able to improve the specific release of DOX at the tumor site. The DOX-loaded hydrogels can be further employed in the clinic for the treatment of cancer patients and improving efficacy of chemotherapy.

A Podcast on Practical Considerations in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer Receiving First-Line Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Avelumab Maintenance in a Changing Therapeutic Landscape

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma for decades, based on its proven efficacy and well-characterized safety profile. Although enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the EV-302 phase 3 trial, common and potentially cumulative toxicities associated with EV plus pembrolizumab may make this combination less suitable for some patients, such as those with pre-existing neuropathy, hyperglycemia, or hepatic impairment, or patients likely to have favorable outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy. The availability of EV plus pembrolizumab in various countries may also be limited by financial considerations. Thus, platinum-based chemotherapy is likely to remain a valuable option for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eligibility for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens can be determined by assessing renal function, performance status, and specific comorbidities. In cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance is standard of care based on findings from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone across clinically relevant subgroups. Adverse events associated with avelumab were generally consistent with those observed with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, and long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns with prolonged treatment. Efficacy benefits and safety profiles were similar in patients who received avelumab first-line maintenance after cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The effectiveness and safety of avelumab first-line maintenance have been confirmed in several real-world studies. Overall, these data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance for all platinum-treated patients without disease progression. In this podcast, we discuss the evolving role of platinum-based chemotherapy in this disease setting in the context of EV-302 trial results and describe practical considerations in patients receiving first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy.

Metastatic Organotropism Differential Treatment Response in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

CONTEXT

The optimal therapeutic agent with respect to metastatic sites is unclear in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the metastatic organotropism differential treatment response in patients with advanced or metastatic UC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The primary endpoints of interest were the objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival with respect to different metastatic sites.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-six trials comprising 9082 patients met our eligibility criteria, and a formal NMA was conducted. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab as first-line systemic therapy was significantly associated with better OS than chemotherapy in visceral metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.98). Pembrolizumab as second-line systemic therapy was significantly associated with better OS than chemotherapy in patients with visceral metastasis (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.95). Atezolizumab as second-line systemic therapy was significantly associated with better OS than chemotherapy in patients with liver metastasis (in the population of >5% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells) and lymph node metastasis (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.96, and HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of immune-oncology treatments with respect to metastatic sites in patients with advanced or metastatic UC might have a positive impact on survival outcomes in both the first- and the second-line setting. Nevertheless, further investigations focusing on metastatic organotropism differential response with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to identify the optimal management strategy for these patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Although the supporting evidence for oncological benefits of therapeutic systemic agents with respect to metastatic sites is not yet strong enough to provide a recommendation in advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, clinicians may take into account tumor organotropism only in discussion with the patient fully informed on the optimal treatment decision to be taken.

A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Prospective Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Carboplatin (DD-MVACarbo) Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer: Study Protocol of the CARBUNCLE Trial

Unresectable, metastatic, advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) is an aggressive disease and is treated with platinum-containing first-line chemotherapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. Response to first-line chemotherapy is a vital priority in sequential treatment strategies because a better response to first-line chemotherapy is associated with a better response to subsequent therapies. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin chemotherapy is conventionally recommended for cisplatin-ineligible patients. This multicenter, single-arm prospective trial will investigate whether dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and carboplatin (DD-MVACarbo) chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin chemotherapy in terms of efficacy in platinum-naïve, cisplatin-ineligible patients with aUC. After screening and registration, a total of 46 patients will be treated with this novel chemotherapy regimen. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate. The secondary endpoints include disease control rate, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. No evidence of this novel intervention is available as of July 2024. The results are expected to change the standard of care and improve the management of patients with aUC.

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resistant Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin and the Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Dysgeusia on Overall Survival: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan

Randomized phase III trial results have demonstrated enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-Nectin-4 human IgG1 monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, is a useful treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of EV therapy and prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients in clinical practice. This study included patients with la/mUC who received ICI treatment. Patients who subsequently received EV treatment, those who received non-EV chemotherapy, and those who received no treatment were defined as EV, non-EV, and best supportive care (BSC) groups, respectively. The median OS was 20, 15, and 7 months in the EV, non-EV, and BSC groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with la/mUC who had a complete or partial response after EV treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared with those with stable or progressive disease. Univariate analysis showed age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), dysgeusia, and rash as independent predictors of OS improvement. NLR and dysgeusia were independent predictors of OS after EV in multivariate analysis. Patients without these factors had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those with both factors. In real-world practice, EV therapy is an effective treatment for patients with la/mUC after ICI treatment.

Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: real-world results from a Korean expanded access program

Background

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab administered as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without disease progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. This study provides the first real-world data from Korea regarding avelumab 1L maintenance treatment, comprising data obtained from a nationwide expanded access program (EAP).

Methods

This open-label EAP was conducted at five centers from September 2021 until June 2023. Eligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC and were progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks per local prescribing information. Safety and effectiveness were assessed by treating physicians according to routine practice.

Results

Overall, 30 patients were enrolled. At initial UC diagnosis, 20 patients (66.7%) had stage 4 disease and 12 (40.0%) had visceral metastases. The most common 1L chemotherapy regimen was gemcitabine + cisplatin (21 patients; 70.0%). All but one patient (96.7%) had received 4-6 cycles of 1L chemotherapy. The median interval from end of 1L chemotherapy to start of avelumab was 4.4 weeks. Median duration of avelumab treatment was 6.2 months (range, 0.9-20.7); nine patients (30.0%) received >12 months of treatment. Adverse events related to avelumab occurred in 21 patients (70.0%) and were grade ≥3 or classified as serious in three patients (10.0%). Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.3-13.1). Overall survival was not analyzed because only one patient died.

Conclusion

Results from this EAP demonstrated the clinical activity and acceptable safety of avelumab 1L maintenance treatment in Korean patients with advanced UC, consistent with previous studies.

Advancements in Urothelial Cancer Care: Optimizing Treatment for Your Patient

The standard treatment paradigm for muscle invasive bladder cancer has been neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, efforts are ongoing to personalize treatment by incorporating biomarkers to better guide treatment selection. In addition, bladder preservation strategies are aimed at avoiding cystectomy in well-selected patients. Similarly, in the metastatic urothelial cancer space, the standard frontline treatment option of platinum-based chemotherapy has changed with the availability of data from EV-302 trial, making the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab the preferred first-line treatment option. Here, we examine the optimization of treatment intensity and sequencing, focusing on the challenges and opportunities associated with EV/pembrolizumab therapy, including managing toxicities and exploring alternative dosing approaches. Together, these articles provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary strategies in bladder cancer management, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches, ongoing research, and multidisciplinary collaboration to improve patient outcomes in this complex disease landscape.

Hypoxia-associated autophagy flux dysregulation in human cancers

A general feature of cancer is hypoxia, determined as low oxygen levels. Low oxygen levels may cause cells to alter in ways that contribute to tumor growth and resistance to treatment. Hypoxia leads to variations in cancer cell metabolism, angiogenesis and metastasis. Furthermore, a hypoxic tumor microenvironment might induce immunosuppression. Moreover, hypoxia has the potential to impact cellular processes, such as autophagy. Autophagy refers to the catabolic process by which damaged organelles and toxic macromolecules are broken down. The abnormal activation of autophagy has been extensively recorded in human tumors and it serves as a regulator of cell growth, spread to other parts of the body, and resistance to treatment. There is a correlation between hypoxia and autophagy in human malignancies. Hypoxia can regulate the activity of AMPK, mTOR, Beclin-1, and ATGs to govern autophagy in human malignancies. Furthermore, HIF-1α, serving as an indicator of low oxygen levels, controls the process of autophagy. Hypoxia-induced autophagy has a crucial role in regulating the growth, spread, and resistance to treatment in human malignancies. Hypoxia-induced regulation of autophagy can impact other mechanisms of cell death, such as apoptosis. Chemoresistance and radioresistance have become significant challenges in recent years. Hypoxia-mediated autophagy plays a crucial role in determining the response to these therapeutic treatments.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) decreases the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, dose reduction or withdrawal is often preferred in the management of adverse events in the treatment of urothelial cancer. It is also important to maintain therapeutic intensity in order to control disease progression and thereby relieve symptoms, such as hematuria, infection, bleeding, and pain, as well as to prolong the survival. In this clinical question, we compared treatment with primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF to maintain therapeutic intensity with conventional standard therapy without G-CSF and examined the benefits and risks as major outcomes. A detailed literature search for relevant studies was performed using PubMed, Ichu-shi Web, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted and evaluated independently by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and the risk ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated and summarized in a meta-analysis. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, two of which were reviewed in the meta-analysis of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy, and one randomized controlled study showed a reduction in the incidence of FN. Primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF may be beneficial, as shown in a randomized controlled study of dose-dense MVAC therapy. However, there are no studies on other regimens, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen (dose-dense MVAC).

Real-world sequential treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and enfortumab vedotin have opened new avenues for sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). In the pre-enfortumab vedotin era, many patients could not receive third-line treatment owing to rapid disease progression and poor general status. This study aimed to analyze real-world sequential treatment practices for la/mUC in Japan, with a focus on patients who do not receive third-line treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed data for 1023 la/mUC patients diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 institutions from a Japanese nationwide cohort.

RESULTS

At the median follow-up of 28.5 months, the median overall survival from first-line initiation for 905 patients who received systemic anticancer treatment was 19.1 months. Among them, 81% and 32% received second- and third-line treatment. Notably, 52% had their treatment terminated before the opportunity for third-line treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low performance status (≥1), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3), and low body mass index (<21 kg/m2) at the start of first-line treatment were independent risk factors for not proceeding to third-line treatment (p = 0.0024, 0.0069, and 0.0058, respectively). In this cohort, 33% had one of these factors, 36% had two, and 15% had all three.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the high frequency of factors associated with poor tolerance to anticancer treatment in la/mUC patients. The findings suggest the need to establish optimal sequential treatment strategies, maximizing efficacy within time and tolerance constraints, while concurrently providing strong supportive care, considering immunological and nutritional aspects.

Revisiting Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Where Do Cisplatin and Platinum Ineligibility Criteria Stand?

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) for more than two decades. However, many patients with comorbidities cannot receive cisplatin or its alternative, carboplatin. 'Cisplatin-ineligible' and 'platinum-ineligible' patients lacked effective therapy options. However, the recent combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, with pembrolizumab (P), an antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint, is changing the status quo of frontline mUC treatment, with potential synergy seen in the EV-103 and EV-302 clinical trials. First, we review the working definitions of 'cisplatin ineligibility' and 'platinum ineligibility' in mUC clinical trials and the standard of care in both categories. Then, we review select clinical trials for frontline treatment of cisplatin- and platinum-ineligible mUC patients on ClinicalTrials.gov. We classify the investigated drugs in these trials by their therapeutic strategies. Alongside chemotherapy combinations, the field is witnessing more immunotherapy combinations with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, bicycle toxin conjugates, bispecific antibodies, innovative targeted therapies, and many others. Most importantly, we rethink the value of classifying patients by cisplatin or platinum ineligibility in the frontline setting in the post-EVP era. Lastly, we discuss new priority goals to tailor predictive, monitoring, and prognostic biomarkers to these emergent therapies.

Integration of multi-omics and clinical treatment data reveals bladder cancer therapeutic vulnerability gene combinations and prognostic risks

Background

Bladder cancer (BCa) is a common malignancy of the urinary tract. Due to the high heterogeneity of BCa, patients have poor prognosis and treatment outcomes. Immunotherapy has changed the clinical treatment landscape for many advanced malignancies, opening new avenues for the precise treatment of malignancies. However, effective predictors and models to guide clinical treatment and predict immunotherapeutic outcomes are still lacking.

Methods

We downloaded BCa sample data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to identify anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy-related genes through an immunotherapy dataset and used machine learning algorithms to build a new PD-L1 multidimensional regulatory index (PMRI) based on these genes. PMRI-related column-line graphs were constructed to provide quantitative tools for clinical practice. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, tumor immune microenvironment, chemotherapy response, and immunotherapy response of patients based on PMRI system. Further, we performed function validation of classical PMRI genes and their correlation with PD-L1 in BCa cells and screening of potential small-molecule drugs targeting PMRI core target proteins through molecular docking.

Results

PMRI, which consists of four anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy-associated genes (IGF2BP3, P4HB, RAC3, and CLK2), is a reliable predictor of survival in patients with BCa and has been validated using multiple external datasets. We found higher levels of immune cell infiltration and better responses to immunotherapy and cisplatin chemotherapy in the high PMRI group than in the low PMRI group, which can also be used to predict immune efficacy in a variety of solid tumors other than BCa. Knockdown of IGF2BP3 inhibited BCa cell proliferation and migration, and IGF2BP3 was positively correlated with PD-L1 expression. We performed molecular docking prediction for each of the core proteins comprising PMRI and identified 16 small-molecule drugs with the highest affinity to the target proteins.

Conclusions

Our PD-L1 multidimensional expression regulation model based on anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy-related genes can accurately assess the prognosis of patients with BCa and identify patient populations that will benefit from immunotherapy, providing a new tool for the clinical management of intermediate and advanced BCa.

A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines

Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.

Progress in systemic therapy for advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma

Despite recent advances, advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (aUC) remains incurable, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 10%. Platinum-based chemotherapy has a major role as first-line therapy for most patients with aUC. The approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab as maintenance therapy for patients without initial disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy is an important development that has improved the survival outcomes of patients with this disease. Otherwise, the use of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 has been restricted to patients who are ineligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Other important developments include the FDA-accelerated approval of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for patients ineligible to receive cisplatin and the availability of FGFR inhibitors, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for subsequent lines of therapy. Several research questions remain unaddressed including the lack of adequate biomarkers, how to assign priority to the different treatment options for individual patients and which agents can be effective as monotherapies. The future is promising with the emergence of modalities such as antibody-drug conjugate-like drugs, next-generation ICIs, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this Review, we summarize the evolution of systemic therapy for patients with aUC and provide insights into the unmet needs.

Systemic treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer: The landscape in Australia

The 5-year survival rate of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is estimated to be as low as 5%. Currently, systemic platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy is the only first-line treatment for mUC that has an overall survival benefit. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy (usually in combination with gemcitabine) is the preferred treatment but carboplatin is substituted where contraindications to cisplatin exist. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and kinase inhibitors has not yet demonstrated superiority to chemotherapy as first-line therapy and remains investigational in this setting. A recent media release indicates that chemotherapy plus nivolumab gives an OS advantage as first-line treatment but results of this study have not yet been made public. Pembrolizumab remains an option in those having primary progression on first-line chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The antibody-drug conjugate, enfortumab vedotin has TGA approval for patients whose cancer has progressed following chemotherapy and immunotherapy and has just received a positive Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme recommendation. The use of molecular screens for somatic genetic mutations, gene amplifications, and protein expression is expanding as drugs that target such abnormalities show promise. However, despite these advances, a substantial proportion of patients with mUC have significant barriers to receiving any treatment, including advancing age, frailty, and comorbidities, and less toxic, effective therapies are needed.

Pharmacomicrobiomics of cell-cycle specific anti-cancer drugs - is it a new perspective for personalized treatment of cancer patients?

Intestinal bacteria are equipped with an enzyme apparatus that is involved in the active biotransformation of xenobiotics, including drugs. Pharmacomicrobiomics, a new area of pharmacology, analyses interactions between bacteria and xenobiotics. However, there is another side to the coin. Pharmacotherapeutic agents can significantly modify the microbiota, which consequently affects their efficacy. In this review, we comprehensively gathered scientific evidence on the interplay between anticancer therapies and gut microbes. We also underlined how such interactions might impact the host response to a given therapy. We discuss the possibility of modulating the gut microbiota to increase the effectiveness/decrease the incidence of adverse events during tumor therapy. The anticipation of the future brings new evidence that gut microbiota is a target of interest to increase the efficacy of therapy.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of dose-dense MVAC followed by radical cystectomy in Korean patients with muscle-invasive or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of bladder

PURPOSE

While previous retrospective or phase II studies in Western populations showed that dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was beneficial, no studies have been reported in Asian populations. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ddMVAC in Korean patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or locally advanced urothelial cancer (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MIBC (cT2-4aN0M0) or locally advanced UC (cTanyN1-3M0) eligible for radical cystectomy (RC) were enrolled prospectively. The participants were treated with four cycles of ddMVAC with pegfilgrastim every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was pathologic response rate (≤ypT1N0). Secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0N0), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients enrolled between December 2019 and August 2021, 23 were evaluable (52%, cT2-4aN0; 48%, cTanyN1-3). Eighteen patients (78%) completed four cycles of ddMVAC, while remaining five patients experienced early discontinuation. Dose modification (91%) and dose delay (70%) occurred, and the dose intensity of ddMVAC was 79%. Nineteen patients underwent RC and four patients declined. Of 19 patients who underwent RC, eight patients (42%) achieved ≤ypT1N0. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the median RFS was 13.5 months (95% CI, not yet evaluable) and the median OS was 28.9 months (95% confidence interval, 19.9-37.9).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed substantial efficacy and safety of ddMVAC, even in patients with locally advanced UC. The ddMVAC still should be a promising option as NAC in Asian patients with UC.

Treatment Patterns and Efficacy of Chemotherapy After Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Cancer-a Real-World Study in the pre-Antibody-Drug Conjugate Era

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been established as a routine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). However, there has been no standard of care after progression on ICIs. We investigated real-world treatment patterns and efficacy of chemotherapy (CHT) after pembrolizumab, in the era before introduction of maintenance avelumab and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, retrospective study was conducted at twelve Nordic centers. Patients with mUC were treated according to investigator´s choice of CHT after pembrolizumab. Primary endpoint was overall response (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients were included whereof 23 patients received CHT after pembrolizumab as second line treatment (subcohort A) and 79 patients in third line (subcohort B). Platinum-gemcitabine combinations were the most common regimens in subcohort A, and vinflunine in subcohort B. The ORR and DCR were 36% and 47%, respectively. Presence of liver metastases was independently associated with lower ORR and DCR. The PFS and OS were 3.3 months and 7.7 months, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and number of previous cycles of pembrolizumab were found to be independent prognostic factors associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, CHT showed clinically meaningful response rates and survival in mUC patients after progression with pembrolizumab. Clinical benefit may primarily be achieved in patients with favorable ECOG PS, in patients treated with > 6 cycles pembrolizumab as well as in patients without presence of liver metastases.

Antibody-drug conjugates for urothelial carcinoma

The standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma includes platinum chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), originally developed for hematologic malignancies, involve potent cytotoxic agents linked to antibodies that recognize tumor-specific antigens; this rational drug design allows for more on-target efficacy, while mitigating systemic toxicity. Herein, we review the emerging landscape of ADCs in urothelial carcinoma. The anti-Nectin-4 ADC enfortumab vedotin has demonstrated efficacy in prospective studies in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in several settings either alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. The anti-Trop-2 ADC sacituzumab govitecan has also shown efficacy in single-armed studies. Both conjugates have full or accelerated approval from the Food and Drug Administration. Common adverse events include rash and neuropathy for enfortumab vedotin and myelosuppression and diarrhea for sacituzumab govitecan. Several anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ADCs are in clinical trials, and in localized bladder cancer, the anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule ADC oportuzumab monatox is being studied in patients refractory to intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates for urothelial carcinoma are approved and emerging as therapies for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, filling a prior void for treatment of progressive disease. Ongoing studies are also evaluating these agents in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

Avelumab as First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

This work provides a summary of guideline recommendations and an expert position on the use of maintenance avelumab therapy based on a review of current international clinical practice guidelines for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). A PubMed literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in July 2023) to identify guidelines for locally advanced or metastatic UC. An expert panel (four oncologists and one urologist) reviewed the guidelines and clinical evidence, and discussed practical questions regarding the use of avelumab maintenance therapy in this clinical setting. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology and European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend first-line cisplatin-containing chemotherapy for cisplatin-eligible patients, carboplatin-gemcitabine for cisplatin-ineligible patients who are fit for carboplatin, or immunotherapy with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (e.g. atezolizumab) in platinum-ineligible patients. Maintenance avelumab is recommended in patients with response/stable disease following chemotherapy (regardless of PD-L1 status). In patients who relapse after/during chemotherapy, options include immunotherapy, erdafitinib [in those with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutations], enfortumab vedotin or further chemotherapy. The expert panel provided the following practical guidance: (1) consider maintenance avelumab in all eligible patients; (2) continue avelumab until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity; (3) ideally, administer six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy prior to maintenance avelumab; (4) perform radiological evaluation after four chemotherapy cycles and prior to maintenance avelumab; (5) carboplatin-gemcitabine followed by maintenance avelumab is preferred in cisplatin-ineligible patients (regardless of PD-L1 expression), but consider first-line immunotherapy in PD-L1-positive patients and platinum-ineligible patients (regardless of PD-L1 status); and (6) for patients who relapse on avelumab, second-line options include enfortumab vedotin, FGFR inhibitors (in those with FGFR mutations) or clinical trial inclusion. In conclusion, avelumab maintenance therapy is recommended following platinum-based chemotherapy in all eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC, continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Zymosan A Improved Doxorubicin-Induced Ventricular Remodeling by Evoking Heightened Cardiac Inflammatory Responses and Healing in Mice

Background Doxorubicin-induced myocardial injury is reflected by the presence of vacuolization in both clinical and animal models. The lack of scar tissue to replace the vacuolizated cardiomyocytes indicates that insufficient cardiac inflammation and healing occurred following doxorubicin injection. Whether improved macrophage activity by zymosan A (zymosan) ameliorates doxorubicin-induced ventricular remodeling in mice is unknown. Methods and Results Mice were intravenously injected with vehicle or doxorubicin (5 mg/kg per week, 4 weeks), and cardiac structure and function were assessed by echocardiography. Two distinct macrophage subsets in hearts following doxorubicin injection were measured at different time points by flow cytometry. Moreover, cardiomyocyte vacuolization, capillary density, collagen content, and ventricular tensile strength were assessed. The therapeutic effect of zymosan (3 mg/kg, single injection) on doxorubicin-induced changes in the aforementioned parameters was determined. At the cellular level, the polarization of monocytes to proinflammatory or reparative macrophages were measured, with or without doxorubicin (0.25 and 0.5 μmol/L). Doxorubicin led to less proinflammatory and reparative macrophage infiltration in the heart in the early phase, with decreased cardiac capillary density and collagen III in the chronic phase. In cell culture, doxorubicin (0.5 μmol/L) repressed macrophage transition toward both proinflammatory and reparative subset. Zymosan enhanced both proinflammatory and reparative macrophage infiltration in doxorubicin-injected hearts, evoking a heightened acute inflammatory response. Zymosan alleviated doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte vacuolization in the chronic phase, in parallel with enhanced collagen content, capillary density, and ventricular tensile strength. Conclusions Zymosan improved cardiac healing and ameliorated doxorubicin-induced ventricular remodeling and dysfunction by activating macrophages at an optimal time.

The evidence for repurposing anti-epileptic drugs to target cancer

Antiepileptic drugs are versatile drugs with the potential to be used in functional drug formulations with drug repurposing approaches. In the present review, we investigated the anticancer properties of antiepileptic drugs and interlinked cancer and epileptic pathways. Our focus was primarily on those drugs that have entered clinical trials with positive results and those that provided good results in preclinical studies. Many contributing factors make cancer therapy fail, like drug resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and cost; exploring all alternatives for efficient treatment is important. It is crucial to find new drug targets to find out new antitumor molecules from the already clinically validated and approved drugs utilizing drug repurposing methods. The advancements in genomics, proteomics, and other computational approaches speed up drug repurposing. This review summarizes the potential of antiepileptic drugs in different cancers and tumor progression in the brain. Valproic acid, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam are the drugs that showed potential beneficial outcomes against different cancers. Antiepileptic drugs might be a good option for adjuvant cancer therapy, but there is a need to investigate further their efficacy in cancer therapy clinical trials.

How Can the Microbiome Induce Carcinogenesis and Modulate Drug Resistance in Cancer Therapy?

Over the years, cancer has been affecting the lives of many people globally and it has become one of the most studied diseases. Despite the efforts to understand the cell mechanisms behind this complex disease, not every patient seems to respond to targeted therapies or immunotherapies. Drug resistance in cancer is one of the limiting factors contributing to unsuccessful therapies; therefore, understanding how cancer cells acquire this resistance is essential to help cure individuals affected by cancer. Recently, the altered microbiome was observed to be an important hallmark of cancer and therefore it represents a promising topic of cancer research. Our review aims to provide a global perspective of some cancer hallmarks, for instance how genetic and epigenetic modifications may be caused by an altered human microbiome. We also provide information on how an altered human microbiome can lead to cancer development as well as how the microbiome can influence drug resistance and ultimately targeted therapies. This may be useful to develop alternatives for cancer treatment, i.e., future personalized medicine that can help in cases where traditional cancer treatment is unsuccessful.

Systemic Treatment-Decision Algorithms in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Clinical Complexities and Navigating for Improved Outcomes

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer has poor prognosis. If organ confined, it is potentially curable; however, across all prognostic groups, approximately half of patients will relapse. For patients with advanced disease, the median overall survival remains under two years. Systemic treatment options are centered on the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, with the choice of cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens determined on the basis of criteria including performance status and renal function. PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint-directed immunotherapy has been established for use in advanced disease with modest overall improvements in survival outcomes. Based on current data, optimal utilization appears to be a switch maintenance strategy on completion of chemotherapy. In the curative setting, cisplatin-based chemotherapy provides modest improvements in cure rates in those fit to receive it. Data on the use of adjuvant immunotherapy are currently contradictory, with disease-free survival demonstrated for adjuvant nivolumab, but not atezolizumab, and no overall survival benefit has yet been confirmed. The Nectin-4 directed antibody drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin is an established treatment option for patients previously treated with both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The emerging therapeutic targets under evaluation include Trop-2 with sacituzumab govitecan, fibroblast growth factor receptors, HER2, and DNA repair deficiency in biomarker-selected patients. The development of properly validated predictive biomarkers has proven challenging for this disease and should be a central priority in the future development of treatment options. This review summarizes the available systemic treatment options in both palliative and curative disease settings, and highlights the available evidence and current limitations for making treatment recommendations.

Muscle invasive bladder cancer: where is the field headed?

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy or upfront radical cystectomy for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In those who are ineligible for or refuse radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy with chemoradiation is offered. However, with the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin in the metastatic setting, several trials are implementing these drugs in the neoadjuvant setting for cisplatin ineligible patients. Indeed, nivolumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical trials using ICI, ICI/ICI, and ICI/chemotherapy combination therapies in the perioperative setting have been completed. These clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI are safe and have encouraging pCR, making them promising treatment options. Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin alone and in combination with pembrolizumab is also being studied, and preliminarily to have promising activity. ICI is also being combined with radiation therapy (RT) and early data indicate that ICI combined with RT or chemo-RT may be safe with promising activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Biomarkers are urgently needed to identify appropriate treatment options for individual patients. The use of novel treatment approaches and biomarkers will help shape the future of precision therapy for MIBC and enable bladder preservation.

Gold nanostructure-mediated delivery of anticancer agents: Biomedical applications, reversing drug resistance, and stimuli-responsive nanocarriers

The application of nanoarchitectures in cancer therapy seems to be beneficial for the delivery of antitumor drugs. In recent years, attempts have been made to reverse drug resistance, one of the factors threatening the lives of cancer patients worldwide. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are metal nanostructures with a variety of advantageous properties, such as tunable size and shape, continuous release of chemicals, and simple surface modification. This review focuses on the application of GNPs for the delivery of chemotherapy agents in cancer therapy. Utilizing GNPs results in targeted delivery and increased intracellular accumulation. Besides, GNPs can provide a platform for the co-delivery of anticancer agents and genetic tools with chemotherapeutic compounds to exert a synergistic impact. Furthermore, GNPs can promote oxidative damage and apoptosis by triggering chemosensitivity. Due to their capacity for providing photothermal therapy, GNPs can enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents against tumor cells. The pH-, redox-, and light-responsive GNPs are beneficial for drug release at the tumor site. For the selective targeting of cancer cells, surface modification of GNPs with ligands has been performed. In addition to improving cytotoxicity, GNPs can prevent the development of drug resistance in tumor cells by facilitating prolonged release and loading low concentrations of chemotherapeutics while maintaining their high antitumor activity. As described in this study, the clinical use of chemotherapeutic drug-loaded GNPs is contingent on enhancing their biocompatibility.

Switch-maintenance avelumab immunotherapy following first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: the first Japanese real-world evidence from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To develop the first Japanese real-world evidence of switch-maintenance avelumab in advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC).

METHODS

A multicenter-derived database registered 505 patients diagnosed with aUC between 2008 and 2021. Of these, 204 patients (40%) were selected and stratified according to the type of therapy used: maintenance avelumab group (27 [5.3%]), second-line (2 L) pembrolizumab group (103 [20%]) and 2 L cytotoxic chemotherapy group (74 [15%]). The progression-free survival and overall survival from the initiation of following therapy were compared. Tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guideline v1.1 during the treatment period. A detailed analysis was performed in the maintenance avelumab group to investigate possible factors associated with response to avelumab therapy.

RESULTS

The maintenance avelumab group had a longer overall survival, not progression-free survival, compared with the other two treatment groups. The median treatment-free interval between the last dose of first-line (1 L) chemotherapy and the initiation of avelumab therapy was 6 weeks (range, 3-22). Disease control rate of maintenance avelumab therapy in patients with a treatment-free interval of ≤6 weeks was higher than that in patients with a treatment-free interval of >6 weeks (77 vs 40%, P = 0.029). The patients showing objective response to 1 L chemotherapy were less likely to experience tumor relapse (4 of 19) after the initiation of avelumab therapy compared with those showing stable disease (7 of 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Objective response to 1 L chemotherapy and early induction of maintenance avelumab therapy may be associated with increased benefit from maintenance avelumab therapy.

Approaches to Clinical Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Possibilities and Limitations

In the surgical oncology field, the change from a past radical surgery to an organ preserving surgery is a big trend. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients eligible for cisplatin. There is a growing interest in bladder preserving strategies after NAC because good oncologic outcome has been reported for pathologic complete response (pCR) patients after NAC, and many studies have continued to discuss whether bladder preservation treatment is possible for these patients. However, in actual clinical practice, decision-making should be determined according to clinical staging and there is a gap that cannot be ignored between clinical complete response (cCR) and pCR. Currently, there is a lack in a uniform approach to post-NAC restaging of MIBC and a standardized cCR definition. In this review, we clarify the gap between cCR and pCR at the current situation and focus on emerging strategies in bladder preservation in selected patients with MIBC who achieve cCR following NAC.

IDH2 stabilizes HIF-1α-induced metabolic reprogramming and promotes chemoresistance in urothelial cancer

Drug resistance contributes to poor therapeutic response in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Metabolomic analysis suggested metabolic reprogramming in gemcitabine-resistant urothelial carcinoma cells, whereby increased aerobic glycolysis and metabolic stimulation of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) promoted pyrimidine biosynthesis to increase the production of the gemcitabine competitor deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) that diminishes its therapeutic effect. Furthermore, we observed that gain-of-function of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) induced reductive glutamine metabolism to stabilize Hif-1α expression and consequently stimulate aerobic glycolysis and PPP bypass in gemcitabine-resistant UC cells. Interestingly, IDH2-mediated metabolic reprogramming also caused cross resistance to CDDP, by elevating the antioxidant defense via increased NADPH and glutathione production. Downregulation or pharmacological suppression of IDH2 restored chemosensitivity. Since the expression of key metabolic enzymes, such as TIGAR, TKT, and CTPS1, were affected by IDH2-mediated metabolic reprogramming and related to poor prognosis in patients, IDH2 might become a new therapeutic target for restoring chemosensitivity in chemo-resistant urothelial carcinoma.

Consolidative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer Patients with No Progression and with No More than Five Residual Metastatic Lesions Following First-Line Systemic Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis

Local consolidative radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic malignancies has shown promising results in several types of tumors. The objective of this study was to assess consolidative radiotherapy to the bladder and to residual metastases in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer with no progression following first-line systemic therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients who received first-line therapy for the treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (mUBC) and who were progression-free following treatment with no more than five residual metastases were retrospectively identified through the database of four Comprehensive Cancer Centers, between January 2005 and December 2018. Among them, patients who received subsequent definitive radiotherapy (of EQD2Gy > 45Gy) to the bladder and residual metastases were included in the consolidative group (irradiated (IR) group), and the other patients were included in the observation group (NIR group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined from the start of the first-line chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. To prevent immortal time bias, a Cox model with time-dependent covariates and 6-month landmark analyses were performed to examine OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients with at least stable disease following first-line therapy and with no more than five residual metastases were analyzed: 51 in the IR group and 40 in the NIR group. Metachronous metastatic disease was more frequent in the NIR group (19% vs. 5%, p = 0.02); the median number of metastases in the IR group vs. in the NIR group was 2 (1-9) vs. 3 (1-5) (p = 0.04) at metastatic presentation, and 1 (0-5) vs. 2 (0-5) (p = 0.18) after completion of chemotherapy (residual lesions), respectively. Two grade 3 toxicities (3.9%) and no grade 4 toxicity were reported in the IR group related to radiotherapy. With a median follow up of 85.9 months (95% IC (36.7; 101.6)), median OS and PFS were 21.7 months (95% IC (17.1; 29.7)) and 11.1 months (95% IC (9.9; 14.1)) for the whole cohort, respectively. In multivariable analysis, consolidative radiotherapy conferred a benefit in both PFS (HR = 0.49, p = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.47, p = 0.015) in the whole population; in the landmark analysis at 6 months, radiotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.48, p = 0.026), with a trend for PFS (HR = 0.57, p = 0.082).

CONCLUSION

Consolidative radiotherapy for mUBC patients who have not progressed after first-line therapy and with limited residual disease seems to confer both OS and PFS benefits. The role of consolidative radiotherapy in the context of avelumab maintenance should be addressed prospectively.

Systemic therapy in bladder preservation

Bladder cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease. Even when presenting as localized muscle-invasive disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 70%, and the recurrence rate after radical cystectomy is approximately 50%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has the potential to downstage the primary tumor and treat micrometastases, leading to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in cure rates. There is level 1 evidence in favor of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy. However, data from clinical trials evaluating NAC for patients undergoing bladder-sparing treatments are less robust, so this strategy remains controversial. The response to NAC is prognostic and patients with favorable pathological response have better overall survival. Strategies to select patients based on molecular biomarkers have the potential to guide treatment decisions and even de-intensify treatment, avoiding local treatment for those with complete responses to systemic therapy. This review outlines the current literature on the use of NAC in the context of bladder preservation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, highlights neoadjuvant studies in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based NAC, and discusses novel bladder-preservation strategies, including multimodality combinations and biomarker-driven studies of definitive chemotherapy.

Targeted Therapies in Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

This review describes the current landscape of targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma. The standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma patients remains platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy. However, median overall survival for these patients is still <1 year and there is an urgent need for alternative therapies. The advent of next-generation sequencing has allowed widespread comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial tumors and, subsequently, the development of therapies targeting specific molecular pathways implicated in carcinogenesis such as FGFR inhibition, Nectin-4, Trop-2, and HER2 targeting. As these therapies are demonstrated to be effective in the second-line setting, they will be advanced in the treatment paradigm to localized and even non-muscle invasive disease.

Anticancer maintenance chemotherapy prolonged prognosis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients: A single institute retrospective study using propensity score matching

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer maintenance chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of 74 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had been treated with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy between 2006 and 2020 at Osaka University Hospital. Progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival periods were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method starting from the end date of induction chemotherapy. The backgrounds of patients who had treated with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy were adjusted using the propensity score matching method.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had undergone anticancer maintenance chemotherapy, whereas 45 patients had not. The median progression-free survival periods were 18.7 and 5.6 months (p = 0.0209), and the median cancer-specific survival periods were 25.1 and 15.2 months (p = 0.1299), in patients with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy respectively. In multivariate analysis, anticancer maintenance chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression-free survival (hazard ratio 3.65, 95% confidence interval 1.96-6.78, p < 0.0001) and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 1.62-5.76, p = 0.0006) in patients with partial response or stable disease after induction chemotherapy. Also, anticancer maintenance chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression-free survival (13.1 months vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.0027) and cancer-specific survival (35.1 months vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.0044) in propensity score matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticancer maintenance chemotherapy may be considered the treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients after induction chemotherapy.