Improving Hospital Length of Stay: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

Association Between SARC-F and Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Diseases Admitted to the Emergency Room: A Longitudinal Study

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia can be more significant and severe in the presence of cardiovascular diseases. In hospitalized older adults with acute cardiac disease, assessing strength parameters, muscle mass, and physical performance is difficult largely because of bed rest restrictions. In this context, simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia (SARC-F) emerges as a feasible screening tool to identify sarcopenia in an emergency room setting.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the association between SARC-F, length of stay, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality in older adults with cardiovascular diseases admitted to the ER.

METHODOLOGY

An observational longitudinal study with 160 Brazilian older adults with cardiovascular diseases admitted to the hospital following an ER visit. The risk of sarcopenia was assessed by the SARC-F tool (independent variable). Length of stay, use of mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality were the dependent variables, collected via an electronic medical chart. Data were analyzed by simple and multiple linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

SARC-F explained 62% of length of stay, adjusted for the confounding variables age, male sex, and use of continuous medication, mechanical ventilation, and corticosteroids. Risk of sarcopenia was also associated with mechanical ventilation during hospitalization (odds ratio = 1.398; 95% CI, 1.018-1.919). SARC-F was not related to mortality.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with cardiovascular diseases hospitalized at greater risk of sarcopenia were more likely to need invasive mechanical ventilation and more prone to prolonged hospital stays.

Length of hospital stay and associated factors among adult surgical patients admitted to surgical wards in Amhara Regional State Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Ethiopia

INTRODUCTION

Hospitals across the country are facing increases in hospital length of stay ranging from 2% to 14%. This results in patients who stay in hospital for long periods of time being three times more likely to die in hospital. Therefore, identifying factors that contribute to longer hospital stays enhances the ability to improve services and quality of patient care. However, there is limited documented evidence on factors associated with longer hospital stays among surgical inpatients in Ethiopia and the study area.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the length of hospital stay and associated factors among adult surgical patients admitted to surgical wards in Amhara Regional State Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Ethiopia, 2023.

METHODS

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 452 adult surgical patients from April 17 to May 22, 2023. Data were collected based on a pretested, structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire, medical record review, and direct measurement of BMI. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. The collected data were cleaned, entered into EpiData version 4.6.0 and exported to STATA version 14 for analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was used. Variables with a p value <0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression analysis were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the current study, the prevalence of prolonged hospital stay was 26.5% (95% CI: 22.7, 30.8). Patients referred from another public health facility (AOR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.14, 6.14), hospital-acquired pneumonia (AOR = 3.64; 95% CI: 1.43, 9.23), duration of surgery ≥110 minutes (AOR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.25, 5.16), being underweight (AOR = 5.21; 95%CI: 2.63, 10.33) and preoperative anemia (AOR = 3.22; 95% CI: 1.77, 5.86) were factors associated with prolonged hospital stays.

CONCLUSION

This study found a significant proportion of prolonged hospital stays among patients admitted to surgical wards. Patients referred from another public health facility, preoperative anemia, underweight, duration of surgery ≥110 minutes, and hospital-acquired pneumonia were factors associated with prolonged hospital stay. Early screening and treatment of anemia and malnutrition before surgery can shorten the length of stay.

Improving Discharge Rates to Home With the Help of Mobility Technicians: A Step in the Right Direction

Background Early ambulation during acute hospitalization has been associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients. Despite the benefits of mobility in the hospital setting, physical therapists and nursing staff are often constrained by time. Mobility technicians (MTs) are individuals with specialized training who have emerged as a potential solution by providing safe ambulation for patients during their hospital stay. Objectives The purpose of this quality improvement project was to investigate the impact of MTs on clinical and financial outcomes for admitted patients at a high-volume tertiary institution. Methods A quality improvement project was implemented at Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, from October 2022 to March 2023. The study was a prospective, single-institution cohort study and included patients admitted to two medical floors. Patients were divided into an experimental group that received services from MTs and a control group that did not receive this service but was eligible based on clinical status. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged to home. Secondary outcomes included the length of stay and financial impact. Results A total of 396 admitted patients were included, with 222 patients in the MT group and 174 in the non-MT group. Patients in the MT group were discharged home more frequently, at a rate of 79.7% compared to 66.1% for patients in the non-MT group (p = 0.002). MTs contributed to an average 2.4-day reduction in the length of hospital stay (7.8 days vs. 10.2 days, p = 0.007). The MT intervention led to an estimated net savings of $148,500 during the six-month study period. Additionally, 2.9 daily hospital beds were created. Conclusion Implementing an MT program significantly increased the discharge-to-home rates and decreased hospital length of stay. Preliminary analysis suggests that this intervention is cost-effective and can assist institutions in managing increased hospital capacity strain through the creation of additional hospital beds.

The Utilization of 15-Minute Multidisciplinary Rounds to Reduce Length of Stay in Patients under Observation Status

With the recent change to value-based care, institutions have struggled with the appropriate management of patients under observation. Observation status can have a huge impact on hospital and patient expenses. Institutions have implemented specialized observation units to provide better care for these patients. Starting in January 2020, coinciding with the initiation of daily multidisciplinary rounds, our study focused on patients aged 18 and older admitted to our hospital under observation status. Efforts were built upon prior initiatives at Jersey Shore University Medical Center (JSUMC) to optimize patient care and length of stay (LOS) reduction. The central intervention revolved around the establishment of daily "Observation Huddles"-succinct rounds led by hospital leaders to harmonize care for patients under observation. The primary aim was to assess the impact of daily multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) on LOS, while our secondary aim involved identifying specific barriers and interventions that contributed to the observed reduction. Our study revealed a 9-h reduction in observation time, resulting in approximately USD 187.50 saved per patient. When accounting for the period spanning 2020 to 2022, potential savings totaled USD 828,187.50 in 2020, USD 1,046,062.50 in 2021, and USD 1,243,562.50 in 2022. MDR for observation patients led to a reduction in LOS from 29 h to 20 h (p < 0.001).

The Incident Feedback Committee (IFC): A Useful Tool to Investigate Errors in Clinical Research

In clinical practice, an objective of safety management is to identify preventable causes of adverse events to avoid the incidents from recurring. Likewise, in the field of clinical research adequate methods to investigate incidents that impair the quality of a clinical trial are needed. Understanding the causes of errors and undesirable incidents can help guarantee participant safety, improve the practices of research coordinators, investigators, and clinical research assistants and help to minimize research costs. Here, we present the main features of our Incident Feedback Committees (IFC) in clinical research, with outcomes over 5 years. Methods: The IFC has adapted the ALARM and ORION post-event methods with investigations focused on ‘the incidents’ occurring during research studies. It sought the root causes contributing to these incidents and proposed corrective actions. Results: Since our IFC was set up in 2015 it has examined 52 incidents from nine studies. The most frequent causes mainly concerned the working environment (54%). Most incidents had two or more causes. Some corrective actions were planned for ongoing or future studies. Conclusion: IFCs provide a useful and much-appreciated method of analysing incidents in the performance of clinical research. A multicentre study is needed to evaluate the effect of IFCs on the quality of an establishment’s clinical research, at the individual level (patient safety) and also at the system level (changes in the organization of tasks).