Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: current status

Clinical and laboratory parameters can predict response to chemotherapy and long term survival in small cell lung cancer, and may predict those at risk of early treatment related toxicity. This paper reviews the predictive models that have been developed to divide patients into prognostic groups for response and survival on the basis of clinical and laboratory parameters. These factors may be used for the stratification of patients in clinical trials and to help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions for individual patients. A number of treatment-related factors can also affect outcomes. The evidence for interventions to prevent treatment deaths in high risk patients, such as prophylactic antibiotics, dosage modification or colony stimulating factor support are also reviewed.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. The benefit of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both as a palliative treatment of advanced or relapsed disease is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in people with inoperable advanced disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases (UGPD) Group Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1); CANCERLIT (1975-2002); MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005); and EMBASE (1980 to January 2005). We handsearched reference lists from trials revealed by electronic searches to identify further relevant trials. We searched published abstracts from relevant conference proceedings. We contacted colleagues and experts in the field, and asked them to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (single- or double-blind) in patients with advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer, in which one of the intervention types (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) was contrasted with either placebo or another type of intervention. Studies comparing non-chemotherapy agents such as biological agents, hormones, immunostimulants, vaccines and cytokines were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Data were extracted by groups of two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Study authors were contacted for more information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty trials (7043 participants) were included. Chemotherapy significantly reduced the one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.57, P value < 0.00001) when compared to best supportive care. Also, chemoradiation improved one year survival (0% versus 58%, P value 0.001) when compared to best supportive care. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality for 5FU alone versus 5FU combinations (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30); single-agent chemotherapy versus gemcitabine (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.02, P value 0.17); or gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combinations (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05). However, subgroup analysis showed that platinum-gemcitabine combinations reduced six-month mortality compared to gemcitabine alone (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81, P value 0.001). A qualitative overview suggested that chemoradiation produced better survivals than either best supportive care or radiotherapy. Chemoradiation treatment was associated with more toxicity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy appears to prolong survival in people with advanced pancreatic cancer and can confer clinical benefits and improve quality of life. Combination chemotherapy did not improve overall survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy. Gemcitabine is an acceptable control arm for future trials investigating scheduling and combinations with novel agents. There is insufficient evidence to recommend chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer as a superior alternative to chemotherapy alone.

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors: applications in oncology

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are a group of zinc dependent enzymes which include the interstitial collagenases, stromelysins, gelatinases and membrane-type metalloproteinases. They are involved in the remodelling and turnover of the extracellular matrix proteins. They play a role in wound healing and the pathogenesis of arthritis. In malignancies they play a role in tumor invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. A number of synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs) have been developed for clinical use. In preclinical tumor models they have shown promising activity in achieving inhibition of MMPs and reducing tumor growth and metastatic spread. Some have also shown additive or synergistic effects with cytotoxic agents. Phase I and II studies in human subjects have defined the main side effects of these agents as being musculoskeletal pains or arthralgias. As they are cytostatic agents rather than cytotoxic in activity conventional measurements of radiological response for assessment are not applicable in trials. Biological activity has been demonstrated in certain cancers by the effects on levels of tumor markers as surrogate markers of tumor response and also by a fibrotic stromal reaction seen in tumor tissue. Newer agents have been developed with selective inhibition of certain MMPs in an attempt to reduce the side effects. A number of phase III human clinical trials evaluating MMPs are being carried out at present but only one has been formally reported so far. This study suggested that marimastat had no survival advantage when compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Current trials are assessing efficacy of MMPIs in maintenance of remission after other modalities of therapy or in combination with cytotoxic agents. MMPs have also been demonstrated to play an important role in the articular cartilage destruction seen in both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. The use of MMPIs in both ex vivo and in vivo models have shown promising results and trials are in process to assess their potential role in the control of articular destruction. The true therapeutic role of MMPIs await the results of these randomized studies.

Thymoma and agranulocytosis: two case reports and literature review

Thymoma with agranulocytosis is a rare association. We describe two cases of agranulocytosis presenting with sepsis which were both found to have coincident benign spindle cell thymomas. One case, associated with promyelocyte arrest and hypogammaglobulinaemia, was treated successfully with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Thymectomy had no effect. The other case, associated with complete myeloid aplasia, proceeded to a fatal outcome after failure of treatment with granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), plasmapheresis, thymectomy, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone. We also review the literature of thymoma in association with agranulocytosis.

Omeprazole-induced interstitial nephritis

Acute renal impairment secondary to interstitial nephritis is a rare complication of omeprazole. We describe a 50-year-old woman who took 20 mg omeprazole twice daily for endoscopically proved ulcerative esophagitis. At the same time, Duke's C colonic cancer was diagnosed and completely resected. Five fluorouracil/folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy was tolerated without diarrhea or mouth ulceration. Renal function was normal before her first monthly cycle but markedly deteriorated immediately before the second cycle was due. The patient was symptomatic with lethargy, nausea, and mild vomiting, but she was clinically normotensive and only mildly dehydrated. Her serum creatinine concentration increased despite prolonged intravenous hydration, peaking at 4.4 mg/dl 1 week later. Results of a renal ultrasound were normal, and urinary microscopic findings were unremarkable. Renal biopsy showed interstitial nephritis, and renal function improved on cessation of omeprazole, eventually returning to normal. We describe the 12 cases of omeprazole-induced interstitial nephritis reported previously.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in central Sydney:a 10-year review of patients seen in a medical oncology department

AIM:To report a single Australian oncology unit's experience with the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in the context of a literature review of the current management issues.METHODS:Retrospective case record review of 76 patients with diagnosis of HCC referred to the unit between 1984 and 1995.RESULTS:Sixty three patients had adequate records for analysis. Thirty six (56%) were migrants with half from Southeast Asia. Twenty-four patients had a documented viral aetiology.Nine (14%) of 51 patients with pathological confirmation of HCC had normal alpha fetoprotein levels. Median survival of the 20 patients managed palliatively was 5 weeks compared to 16 weeks for the cohort overall. Surgery in 16 patients rendered all initially disease free with a median survival of 88 weeks. Chemoembolisation induced tumor responses in 5 of the 11 patients so treated. Systemic chemotherapy and tamoxifen treatment caused tumor response in two of 12 and one of 25 respectively.CONCLUSION:Prolonged survival of patients with HCC depends on early detection of small tumors suitable for surgical resection. Other active treatments are palliative in intent and have limited success.In addition to tumor response and survival duration, the toxicities of therapies and the overall quality of life of patients need to be considered as important outcomes. Viral hepatitis prevention and screening of individuals at risk are strategies that are important for HCC management in communities where the disease is endemic.

Immunomodulation therapy in colorectal carcinoma

There has been much progress in the understanding of the relationship between the immune system and colorectal cancer. This has led to the use of immunomodulatory therapy in the adjuvant and palliative treatment of the condition. Although attempts at the use of non-specific immunomodulation with agents such as levamisole, cimetidine, alpha interferon and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) have not produced significant clinical benefits when tested in randomized trials in both the adjuvant setting and for metastatic disease, promising results are being obtained with more specific therapy. Edrecolomab [corrected], a murine monoclonal antibody targeting the 17-1A antigen on malignant colorectal cells has produced a reduction in relapse and mortality rates when used as adjuvant treatment following surgery for Dukes' C colon cancer. Active specific therapy with autologous tumour vaccine administered with BCG has produced similar benefits in Dukes' B cancer. Both 3H1 anti-idiotypic antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen and 105AD7 antibody to gp72 glycoprotein have demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo immune activation against tumour. Non-randomized studies postulate prolongation of survival using these antibodies in advanced disease. These agents are all currently being tested in randomized studies powered to detect meaningful survival differences and clinical benefit. Immune therapy offers the potential of low toxicity therapy in colorectal cancer and may have a role as an adjunct to conventional chemotherapy.

A dose-escalating study of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was shown in early clinical studies to have promising activity against gastrointestinal malignancies. Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU also has activity against these tumour types. The primary objective of this study was to determine a tolerable dose for oral eniluracil/5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies were recruited into this open-label study. Patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle), and the dose intensity of oral eniluracil/5-FU was gradually increased by escalating the number of days of treatment per course.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose intensity was eniluracil/5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily for 16 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities included vomiting and diarrhoea. The objective tumour response rate was 26% with a median duration of response of 15.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 8.5-22.1). Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced neurotoxicity (sensory neuropathy or cold-related dysaesthesia), although only two events were severe (grade 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for future study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer is 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for 14 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each treatment cycle.

Controversies in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Major advances in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) have improved survival for both patients with advanced disease and those diagnosed with high-risk primary tumors. The Consensus approaches to best practice management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, published in this journal in 2008, provided guidance for the management of GIST to both clinicians and regulatory authorities. Since then, clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant imatinib in high-risk patients, and mature data from advanced GIST studies suggest that a small but significant proportion of patients with advanced disease can achieve long-term benefit with ongoing imatinib treatment. Other evolving management strategies include the controversial use of palliative or debulking surgery to improve outcomes in advanced GIST and the development of promising new multikinase inhibitors, such as regorafenib, which has established benefit in the third-line setting. This review provides an update of recent developments in GIST management and discusses new controversies that these advances have generated.

WITHDRAWN: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. The benefit of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both as a palliative treatment of advanced or relapsed disease is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in people with inoperable advanced disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases (UGPD) Group Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1); CANCERLIT (1975-2002); MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005); and EMBASE (1980 to January 2005). We handsearched reference lists from trials revealed by electronic searches to identify further relevant trials. We searched published abstracts from relevant conference proceedings. We contacted colleagues and experts in the field, and asked them to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (single- or double-blind) in patients with advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer, in which one of the intervention types (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) was contrasted with either placebo or another type of intervention. Studies comparing non-chemotherapy agents such as biological agents, hormones, immunostimulants, vaccines and cytokines were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Data were extracted by groups of two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Study authors were contacted for more information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty trials (7043 participants) were included. Chemotherapy significantly reduced the one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.57, P value < 0.00001) when compared to best supportive care. Also, chemoradiation improved one year survival (0% versus 58%, P value 0.001) when compared to best supportive care. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality for 5FU alone versus 5FU combinations (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30); single-agent chemotherapy versus gemcitabine (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.02, P value 0.17); or gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combinations (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05). However, subgroup analysis showed that platinum-gemcitabine combinations reduced six-month mortality compared to gemcitabine alone (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81, P value 0.001). A qualitative overview suggested that chemoradiation produced better survivals than either best supportive care or radiotherapy. Chemoradiation treatment was associated with more toxicity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy appears to prolong survival in people with advanced pancreatic cancer and can confer clinical benefits and improve quality of life. Combination chemotherapy did not improve overall survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy. Gemcitabine is an acceptable control arm for future trials investigating scheduling and combinations with novel agents. There is insufficient evidence to recommend chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer as a superior alternative to chemotherapy alone.

Building Capability and Capacity: The Establishment of an Oncology Unit in the Solomon Islands

PURPOSE

To describe the establishment of an oncology unit at the National Referral Hospital (NRH) in the Solomon Islands, a low-income nation in the South Pacific.

METHODS

A scoping visit was carried out in 2016 to assist in the development of coordinated cancer services and to establish a medical oncology unit at the NRH at the request of the Medical Superintendent. This was followed by an observership visit to Canberra by an NRH doctor training in oncology in 2017. After a request from the Solomon Islands Ministry of Health, the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) arranged an in-country multidisciplinary mission under the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons/Royal Australasian College of Physicians Pacific Islands Program to help in the commissioning of the NRH Medical Oncology Unit in September 2018. Staff training and education sessions were held. The team, with the assistance of an Australian Volunteers International Pharmacist, has helped the NRH staff to develop localized Solomon Islands Oncology Guidelines. Donated equipment and supplies have helped with the initial establishment of the service. A second DFAT Oncology mission visit was made in 2019 followed by two NRH oncology nurses visiting Canberra on observership later that year and support of the Solomon's doctor to pursue postgraduate education in cancer sciences. Ongoing mentorship and support has been maintained.

RESULTS

The island nation now has a sustainable oncology unit delivering chemotherapy treatments and management of patients with cancer.

CONCLUSION

A collaborative multidisciplinary team approach by professionals from the high-income country working with colleagues from the low-income nation with coordination of different stakeholders was the key to this successful initiative in improving cancer care.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer is a tumor that has a very poor prognosis without treatment. It is however, highly responsive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pretreatment clinical and laboratory parameters--in addition to staging--can prognosticate outcome and help define the aim of treatment. Different schedules of chemotherapy have been developed and varied strategies, such as chemotherapy dose intensification have been tried to improve outcomes. New agents, such as irinotecan, gemcitabine and topotecan have also been tested. Clinical trials have helped to define strategies of integrating thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial radiotherapy into management of those patients with limited disease to improve survival further. Despite good initial responses to treatment, most patients eventually relapse. Maintenance strategies with ongoing chemotherapy or novel agents, such as interferon, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, thalidomide and vaccines are discussed.

Imatinib alternating with regorafenib compared to imatinib alone for the first-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: The AGITG ALT-GIST intergroup randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

To determine if an alternating regimen of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and regorafenib improved outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

METHODS

ALTGIST (NCT02365441) was a randomized phase II study of standard treatment of imatinib (Arm A) compared with an experimental alternating regimen of imatinib and regorafenib (Arm B). Primary outcome was best objective tumor response (OTR) at nine months.

RESULTS

Seventy-six eligible patients (Arm A 36, Arm B 40) enrolled were evaluable. Median follow-up was 46.0 months (range 6.5-64.6). Best responses and OTR were similar at 9 months. Eighteen (50.0%) Arm A patients and twelve (30.0%) Arm B patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. No Arm A patients stopped protocol therapy due to unacceptable toxicity, with 12 (30.0%) stopping in Arm B. Twelve (33.2%) Arm A patients and 12 (30.0%) Arm B patients experienced at least one serious adverse event, mostly grade 3. Secondary endpoints of PFS at 1 and OS at 1 year were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternation of imatinib and regorafenib did not impact on 9 months objective response nor on the secondary objectives of PFS and OS. Patients in the alternating arm experienced more toxicity and protocol discontinuations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02365441.

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney associated with the sickle cell trait

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare neoplasm that arises from the medullary collecting ducts. It has an aggressive clinical course and patients usually present with metastatic disease. Treatment approaches apart from surgery have been unrewarding. Renal medullary carcinoma is also an aggressive tumour which occurs predominantly in young, black, male patients with sickle cell trait. We describe a case of collecting duct carcinoma in a 61-year-old black female who exhibited the sickle cell trait. Histopathology revealed a high-grade tubular carcinoma with marked desmoplasia, adjacent dysplastic collecting ducts and positive immunohistochemical staining for high and low molecular weight cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen. The association of collecting duct carcinoma with sickle cell trait has not been previously reported. This case supports the postulate that collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma may be part of the same spectrum of renal malignancies.