Long-term observations of the patterns of failure in patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy. Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

This report details the patterns of tumor recurrence in two prospective randomized studies involving 551 patients with histologically proven unresectable or medically inoperable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiotherapy. Patients were treated according to two protocols, depending on the stage of the tumor: (1) Patients with T1, 2, 3-NO, 1, 2 tumors were randomized to four different regimens: 4000 cGy split course (2000 cGy in five fractions, per 1 week, 2 weeks rest and additional 2000 cGy in five fractions, per 1 week) or 4000, 5000, or 6000 cGy continuous courses, five fractions per week. (2) Patients with T4, any N or N3, any T stage tumors were randomized to be treated with 3000 cGy tumor dose (TD), ten fractions in 2 weeks, 4000 cGy split course (described above), or 4000 cGy continuous course. In the patients with less advanced tumors (Study 1) the intrathoracic failure rate within the irradiated volume was 48% with 4000 cGy continuous, 38% with 4000 cGy split course or 5000 cGy continuous, and 27% for patients receiving 6000 cGy continuous course. The failure rate in the nonirradiated lung ranged from 25% to 30% in the various groups. Patients with adenocarcinoma or large cell undifferentiated carcinoma had better intrathoracic tumor control (35%) than those with squamous cell carcinoma (20%). The incidence of distant metastases was 75% to 80% in all histologic groups. Distant metastases appeared sooner after therapy in the patients with adenocarcinoma or large cell undifferentiated carcinoma. The initial failure rate in the brain was 7% in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 19% with adenocarcinoma, and 13% in patients with large cell carcinoma. The ultimate incidence of brain metastases was 16% in squamous cell carcinoma, and 30% for adenocarcinoma or large cell undifferentiated carcinoma. Higher doses of irradiation will be necessary in order to improve the intrathoracic tumor control. Clinical trials by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, some of them involving multiple daily fractionation, are in progress. Furthermore, because of the high incidence of distant metastases, effective systemic cytotoxic agents are critically needed to improve survival of lung cancer patients. The high frequency of brain metastases suggests that, as in small cell carcinoma of the lung, elective irradiation of the brain may be necessary, if not to improve survival to enhance the quality of life of patients with adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma.

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Some studies have described decreased pelvic tumor control and survival rates in invasive carcinoma of uterine cervix when the overall time in a course of definitive irradiation is prolonged. We attempt to confirm or deny these observations and evaluate the impact of timing of brachytherapy on outcome. We also explore the hypothesis that more extensive tumors technically require prolongation of the course of irradiation; thus, decreased tumor control and survival in these patients may not necessarily be the result of time/dose factor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 1,224 patients (Stage IB to III) treated with definitive irradiation (combination of external beam and two intracavitary insertions to deliver doses of 70 to 90 Gy to point A) were reviewed. Follow-up was obtained in 97% of the patients (median, 12 years; minimum, 3 years; maximum, 28 years). The relationship between outcome and overall treatment time and time of intracavitary insertions was analyzed in each stage and according to tumor size/extent.

RESULTS

There was strong correlation between overall treatment time (OTT) and tumor stage (< or = 7 weeks: 81% for Stage IB; 74% for Stage IIA; 52% for Stage IIB; and 47% for Stage III). Interruptions of therapy accounting for prolongation of treatment time occurred in 25-30% of patients, most frequently because of holidays and weekends and side effects of therapy. Overall treatment time had a major impact on pelvic tumor control in Stages IB, IIA, and IIB; in Stage IB 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rates were 7% with OTT < or = 7 weeks, 22% with 7.1 to 9 weeks, and 36% with > 9 weeks (p < or = 0.01). For Stage IIA the corresponding values were 14%, 27%, and 36% (p = 0.08), and in Stage IIB pelvic failure rates were 20%, 28%, and 34%, respectively (p = 0.09). In Stage III, pelvic failure was 30%, 40%, and 50%, respectively (p = 0.08). There was also a strong correlation between OTT and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS); in Stage IB rates were 86% with OTT of < or = 7 weeks, 78% for 7.1 to 9 weeks, and 55% for > or = 9 weeks (p < 0.01). The corresponding rates in Stage IIA were 73%, 41%, and 48% (p < or = 0.01). For patients with Stage IIB, CSS rates were 72% for OTT < or = 7 weeks, 60% for 7.1 to 9 weeks, and 70% for > 9 weeks (p = 0.01). Patients with Stage III disease had 45% 10-year CSS when treatment was delivered in 9 weeks or less and 36% for longer overall times (p = 0.16). In multivariate analysis of patients with Stage IB and IIA, OTT and clinical stage were the most important prognostic factors for pelvic tumor control, disease-free survival, and CSS. Tumor size was a prognostic factor for CSS. In Stages IIB and III, OTT, clinical stage, unilateral or bilateral parametrial invasion, and dose to point A were significant prognostic factors for pelvic tumor control, disease-free survival, and CSS. Prolongation of time had a significant impact on pelvic tumor control and CSS regardless of tumor size, except in Stage IB tumors < or = 3 cm. Regression analysis confirms previous reports that prolongation of OTT results in decreased pelvic tumor control rate of 0.85% per day for all patients, 0.37% per day in Stages IB and IIA, 0.68% per day in Stage IIB, and 0.54% for Stage III patients treated with > or = 85 Gy to point A. Performance of all intracavitary insertions within 4.5 weeks from initiation of irradiation yielded decreased pelvic failure rates in some groups of patients (8.8 vs. 18% in Stage IB and IIA tumors < or = 4 cm and 12.3 vs. 35% in Stage IIB) (p < or = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolongation of treatment time in patients with Stage IB, IIA, IIB, and III carcinoma of the uterine cervix has a significant impact on pelvic tumor control and CSS. The effect of OTT was present regardless of tumor size except in Stage IB tumors < or = 3 cm.

Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Analysis of complications

A retrospective analysis was carried out on 811 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. A correlation was made of the doses of irradiation delivered to the pelvic organs with external beam and intracavitary insertions. Approximately 3% of the patients exhibited grade 2 gastrointestinal complications, and 2% developed grade 2 urinary complications; 5% of the patients developed grade 3 gastrointestinal complications, and 3% developed grade 3 urinary complications. Other types of complications, primarily grade 2, such as vaginal necrosis, pelvic abscess, thrombophlebitis, etc, were seen in approximately 5% of the patients. Thus, the total percentage of patients developing grade 2 complications was 10% and grade 3 complications, approximately 8%. About 25% of the patients who had complications showed more than one sequela. The most frequently observed grade 2 complications were proctitis, cystitis, vaginal stenosis, and partial small bowel obstruction which were treated with conservative management. Grade 3 complications required surgical treatment and consisted most frequently of ureteral stricture, vesicovaginal fistula, rectovaginal fistula, sigmoid stricture, small bowel obstruction, proctitis, and large rectal ulcers. The most significant factor affecting the appearance of complications was the total dose of irradiation delivered to the pelvic organs by the whole pelvis external irradiation and intracavitary insertions. With maximum total doses up to 8000 rad the incidence of grade 2 and 3 complications was less than 5%. However, with higher doses the incidence of complications increased to 10% to 15%. In patients receiving total doses of 6000 rad to the bladder or rectum, more complications were noted when only one intracavitary insertion was performed, as compared with two or three. Eighty percent of the rectosigmoid complications occurred within 30 months of initial therapy, in contrast to 48 months for the urinary complications. Patients who developed complications had survival rates comparable to those without complications. This underscores the need to rapidly institute treatment on patients who have severe injury after radiation therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Impact of tumor control on survival in carcinoma of the lung treated with irradiation

The long-term results in tumor response, intrathoracic tumor control and survival are reported in patients with medically inoperable or unresectable non-oat cell and small cell carcinoma of the lung. In 376 patients with stages T1-3, NO-2 carcinoma of the lung tumors, accessioned to a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) randomized study to evaluate different doses of irradiation, a higher complete response rate (24%), intrathoracic tumor control (67%) and three year survival (15%) was observed with 6000 cGy, compared with lower doses of irradiation (4000 or 5000 cGy). Increased survival was noted in patients with complete tumor response. Three year survival in complete responders was 23%, in partial responders, 10%, and in patients with stable disease, 5%. Patients treated with 6000 cGy had an overall intrathoracic failure rate of 33% at 3 years, compared with 42% for those treated with 5000 cGy, 44% for patients receiving 4000 cGy with split course, and 52% for those treated with 4000 cGy continuous course (p = 0.02). Patients surviving 6 or 12 months exhibited a statistically significant increased survival when the intrathoracic tumor was controlled. Patients treated with 5000-6000 cGy, showing tumor control, had a three year survival of 22%, versus 10%, if they had intrathoracic failure (p = 0.05). In patients treated with 4000 cGy (split or continuous), the respective survival was 20% and 10%, if the intrathoracic tumor was controlled (p = 0.001). In patients surviving 12 months after treatment with 5000-6000 cGy, on whom the intrathoracic tumor was controlled, the median survival was 29 months, in contrast to 18 months, if they developed intrathoracic failure (p = 0.05). In patients treated with 4000 cGy, the median survival was 23 months with control and 18 months without control of the intrathoracic tumor [corrected] (p = 0.008). In another RTOG study for patients with more advanced tumors (T4 or N3), those with local tumor control at 12 months had a three year survival rate of 25%, compared with 5% for those with thoracic failures. These differences are statistically significant (p = 0.006). Higher doses of irradiation yield a greater proportion of complete response, higher intrathoracic tumor control and better survival in non-oat cell medically inoperable or unresectable carcinoma of the lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 1178 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. The minimum follow-up time was 3 years. The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 6% for tumors less than 3 cm, 15% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 30% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.0018). The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IIA was 10% for tumors less than 3 cm, 28% for tumors 3 to 5 cm, and 20% for tumors more than 5 cm (P = 0.09). Stage IIB unilateral nonbulky tumors (less than 5 cm) had a 20% pelvic failure rate compared with 28% for bilateral lesions and 35% for unilateral bulky tumors (more than 5 cm) (P = 0.35). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were greater when disease extended into the lateral parametrium (30%) compared with medial parametrial involvement only (17%) (P = 0.01). In Stage III unilateral nonbulky tumors, the pelvic failure rate was 28% compared with 45% to 50% for unilateral bulky lesions (P = 0.002). Bilateral parametrial disease in Stage IIB did not increase the pelvic failure rate (21% in both subgroups) (P = 0.83), whereas in Stage III, bilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 48% pelvic failure rate versus 28% for unilateral extension (P less than or equal to 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for IB tumors less than or equal to 3 cm was 90% versus 67% for tumors more than 3 cm (P = 0.01). In Stage IIA tumors less than or equal to 3 cm, 5-year DFS was 70% versus 45% for tumors more than 3 cm. Patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors (less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter) had better 10-year DFS (65% to 70%) compared with those with bilateral bulky tumors (45% to 55%) (P = 0.10). Stage III patients with unilateral nonbulky tumors had a 55% 10-year DFS compared with 35% to 40% for bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement (P = 0.002). The authors concluded that clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in the prognosis, therapy selection, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of uterine cervix. I. Analysis of tumor recurrence

This is a retrospective analysis with emphasis on the patterns of failure in 849 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. In 281 patients with Stage IB tumors, the total incidence of pelvic failure was 6.4% (two without and 16 combined with distant metastasis). In 88 patients with Stage IIA, 12.5% failed in the pelvis (one without and ten combined with distant metastasis). The total pelvic failure rate in Stage IIB was 17.4% (22 without and 22 combined with distant metastasis). In 212 patients with Stage III, the overall pelvic failure rate was 35.8% (31 without and 45 combined with distant metastasis). Approximately 25% of the pelvic recurrences were central (cervix or vagina) and 75% parametrial. The overall incidence of distant metastasis was 13.5% for Stage IB, 27.3% for Stage IIA, 23.8% for Stage IIB, and 39.6% in Stage III. Higher doses of irradiation delivered to the medial and lateral parametrium with external beam irradiation and intracavitary insertions were correlated with a lower incidence of parametrial failures in all stages, except IB. In Stage IIA, medial parametrial doses below 9000 rad resulted in 10/78 = 12.8% pelvic failures, in contrast to one recurrence in 10 patients treated with doses over 9000 rad. In Stage IIB, doses below 9000 rad yielded a pelvic recurrence rate of 36/203 (17.7%) compared to 5/49 (10.2%) with higher doses. In Stage III there were 66/167 (39.5%) recurrences with doses below 9000 rad and 10/44 (22.7%) with larger doses. Statistically significant differences were observed among the Stage IIB (P = 0.02) and III patients (P = 0.005) respectively. The lateral parametrial dose also showed some correlation with tumor control, although the differences were not statistically significant. The survival in patients with Stage IIB and III was 10% higher in the patients treated with higher parametrial doses. However, the differences are not statistically significant. These results strongly suggest that higher doses of irradiation must be delivered to patients with Stage IIB and III, but improvement in tumor control must be weighed against an increasing number of complications. Factors other than the total doses of irradiation, such as the characteristics of the tumor and the quality of the intracavitary insertion influence the therapeutic results in irradiation of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Other therapeutic approaches must be designed to improve the effect of irradiation in the tumor without further injury to the normal tissues. Hypoxic cell sensitizers, hyperthermia and high LET particles are under investigation.

Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of tumor size and extent, and dose of irradiation on pelvic tumor control, incidence of distant metastases, and disease-free survival in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records were reviewed of 1499 patients (Stages IA-IVA) treated with definitive irradiation (combination of external beam plus two intracavitary insertions to deliver doses of 65-95 Gy to point A, depending on stage and tumor volume). Follow-up was obtained in 98% of patients (median 11 years, minimum 3 years, maximum 30 years). The relationship between outcome and tumor size was analyzed in each stage. Pelvic tumor control was correlated with total doses to point A and to the lateral pelvic wall.

RESULTS

The 10-year actuarial pelvic failure rate in Stage IB was 5% for tumors <2 cm, 15% for 2.1-5 cm, and 35% for tumors >5 cm (p = 0.01); in Stage IIA, the rates were 0%, 28%, and 25%, respectively (p = 0.12). Stage IIB unilateral or bilateral nonbulky tumors <5 cm had a 23% pelvic failure rate compared with 34% for unilateral or bilateral bulky tumors >5 cm (p = 0.13). In Stage IIB, pelvic failures were 18% with medial parametrial involvement only, compared with 28% when tumor extended into the lateral parametrium (p = 0.05). In Stage III, unilateral parametrial involvement was associated with a 32% pelvic failure rate versus 50% for bilateral extension (p < 0.01). Ten-year disease-free survival rates were 90% for IB tumors <2 cm, 76% for 2.1-4 cm, 61% for 4.1-5 cm, and 47% for >5 cm (p = 0.01); in Stage IIA, the rates were 93%, 63%, 39%, and 59%, respectively (p < or = 0.01). Patients with Stage IIB medial parametrial involvement had better 10-year disease-free survival (67%) than those with lateral parametrial extension (56%) (p = 0.02). Stage III patients with unilateral tumor extension had a 48% 10-year disease-free survival rate compared with 32% for bilateral parametrial involvement (p < or = 0.01). The presence of endometrial extension or tumor only in the endometrial curettings had no significant impact on pelvic failure. However, in patients with Stage IB disease, the incidence of distant metastases was 31% with positive curettings, 15% with negative curettings, and 22% with admixture (p < or = 0.01). In Stage IIA, the corresponding values were 51%, 33%, and 18% (p = 0.05). The 10-year disease-free survival rates in Stage IB were 67% with positive curettings, 81% for negative curettings, and 77% for admixture (p = 0.02); in Stage IIA, the rates were 45%, 66%, and 67%, respectively (p = 0.14). Because this is not a prospective Phase II dose-escalation study, the correlation of doses of irradiation with pelvic tumor control in the various stages and tumor size groups is not consistent. Nevertheless, with Stage IB and IIA tumors <2 cm in diameter, the pelvic failure rate was under 10% with doses of 70-80 Gy to point A, whereas for larger lesions even doses of 85-90 Gy resulted in 25% to 37% pelvic failure rates. In Stage IIB with doses of 70 Gy to point A, the pelvic failure rate was about 50% compared with about 20% in nonbulky and 30% in bulky tumors with doses > 80 Gy. In Stage III unilateral lesions, the pelvic failure rate was about 50% with < or =70 Gy to point A versus 35% with higher doses, and in bilateral or bulky tumors it was 60% with doses <70 Gy and 50% with higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical stage and size of tumor are critical factors in prognosis, therapy efficacy, and evaluation of results in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The doses to point A suggest that for lesions <2 cm, doses of 75 Gy result in < or =10% pelvic failures, whereas in more extensive lesions, even with doses of 85 Gy, the pelvic failure rate is about 30%; and in Stage IIB-III tumors, doses of 85 Gy result in 35-50% pelvic failures. Refinements in brachytherapy techniques and/or use of agents to selectively sensitize the tumors to irradiation will be necessary to improve the present results in invasive carcinoma of t

Carcinoma of the nasopharynx: factors affecting prognosis

This is a retrospective analysis of 143 patients with histologically confirmed epidermoid carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated with definitive irradiation. Patients were treated with a combination of Cobalt-60, 4 to 6 MV X rays, and 18 to 25 MV X rays to the primary tumor and the upper necks, excluding the spinal cord at 4000 to 4500 cGy to total doses of 6000 to 7000 cGy. At 10 years the actuarial primary tumor failure rate was 15% in T1, 25% in T2, 33% in T3, and 60% in T4 lesions. The corresponding failure rate in the neck was 18% for N0, 14% for N1, and 33% for N2 and N3 lymphadenopathy. The incidence of distant metastasis was related to the stage of the cervical lymphadenopathy: 16% in patients with N0-N1 nodes compared with 40% in the N2-3 node group. The actuarial 10-year disease-free survival rate was 55% to 60% for T1-3N0-1 tumors, 45% for T1-3N2-3 tumors, 35% for T4N0-1, and 20% for T4N2-3 lesions. The overall 10-year survival rate was about 40% for patients with T1-2N0-1 tumors, 30% for those with T3 any N stage tumors, and only 10% for the patients with T4 lesions. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage and histological type, cranial nerve involvement, patient age, and doses of irradiation to the nasopharynx were significant prognostic factors for local/regional tumor control. Increasing doses of irradiation resulted in nasopharynx tumor control in 80% of the patients receiving 6600 to 7000 cGy and 100% of those receiving over 7000 cGy in the T1, T2, and T3 tumors. However, the tumor control rate did not rise above 55% even for doses over 7000 cGy in the T4 lesions. Local tumor control was higher in patients who had simulation (55/78 = 71%) compared with those on whom simulation was not performed (34/61 = 56%) (p = 0.10). Moreover, patients with more than 75% of the reviewed films judged as adequate had 69% primary tumor control (66/96) compared with 53% (23/43) for those with fewer than 75% adequate portal films (p = 0.07).

Quality assurance problems in clinical hyperthermia and their impact on therapeutic outcome: a Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Since February 1981, 300 patients with superficial measurable tumors were randomized on an RTOG protocol (81-04) involving fractionated radiation therapy (4.00 Gy twice weekly for a total of 32.00 Gy), either alone or followed immediately by hyperthermia (42.5 degrees C, 60 min). This is a report of 218 eligible patients with single lesions: 107 treated with radiotherapy alone (RT), 111 with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia (RT + HT). Only 56% of the 24 tumors less than 3 cm and 36% of the 53 lesions larger than 3 cm received what was felt to be "adequate" therapy (greater than or equal to 29 Gy and 8 heating sessions). Overall complete response (CR) was observed in 28% of the patients treated with RT, and 32% of the patients receiving RT and heat. Response has been found in previous analyses of this and other RTOG studies to be significantly related to both maximum tumor diameter (less than 3 or greater than or equal to 3 cm) and site/histology (breast/adenocarcinoma, head and neck/squamous, or other site/histologies). In the head and neck tumors less than 3 cm in diameter there was no difference in CR with irradiation alone or combined with hyperthermia (46% vs 43%). However, in the breast, and trunk and extremities a better CR rate was noted with irradiation and heat (55% and 67%) than with irradiation alone (33% and 0). In lesions less than 3 cm treated with irradiation and heat the probability of remaining in response was 80% compared with 15% with irradiation alone. In lesions larger than 3 cm no difference in CR was observed in either treatment group. It has been hypothesized that the response rate is higher in patients with smaller lesions (less than 3 cm) and in breast/chest wall, trunk/extremity lesions because these tumors and anatomical sites are easier to heat adequately. Problems encountered in correlating tumor response with quality of heating include less than optimal heating in larger lesions and the limited ability of current thermometry to accurately represent the temperature distribution in a tumor. Furthermore, differences in equipment and treatment practices among institutions add to the variability in heat administration data collected. In addition, tumor response may be difficult to judge because of short survival of some patients and occasionally rapid tumor regression that may cause necrosis which may be misinterpreted as persistent tumor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Randomized trial of radiotherapy to the thorax in limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung treated with multiagent chemotherapy and elective brain irradiation: a preliminary report

A total of 304 patients with limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and vincristine (CAV) and elective brain irradiation (3,600 rad TD in 14 fractions). The patients were randomized to either receive or not receive thoracic irradiation (4,000 rad TD, split course). Of the 304 patients, 291 were eligible for the study. Two hundred eighteen (75%) were completely evaluable. In each group, 81% of the patients had a Karnofsky index of 80% or higher and 14% had supraclavicular or scalene lymph nodes. Patients treated with CAV and no thoracic irradiation had a complete response (CR) of 48%, in contrast to 63% for those receiving chest irradiation (P = .05). In the first group, the complete and partial response rate was 70%; in the second, 80%. The median survival for the eligible patients treated with CAV and brain radiation therapy was 49 weeks; for those treated with the same regimen plus thoracic irradiation, the median survival was 60 weeks. The actuarial two-year tumor-free survival is 19% in the first group and 28% in the second group. The median survival for the responders in the CAV plus brain irradiation group was 57 weeks and for those receiving thoracic irradiation, 78 weeks (P = .12). Thoracic failure was 52% in patients not treated with thoracic radiation therapy v 36% in those receiving it (P = .06). The distant metastases incidence was 23% in patients not treated with thoracic radiation and 35% in patients treated with thoracic radiation. Hematologic toxicity was comparable in both groups; 30% of the patients had moderate to severe granulocytopenia and 6%, low homoglobin. Two toxicity-related deaths occurred (one in each group). Moderate gastrointestinal toxicity was noted in 41% and severe in 16% of the patients receiving CAV and brain irradiation without thoracic radiotherapy v 44% and 20% in those irradiated in the thorax. Disease-free survival is enhanced in the patients receiving thoracic irradiation. More effective chemotherapy is critically needed to significantly improve overall survival. These preliminary results suggest that thoracic irradiation should be a primary component in the therapy of these patients, although this combined therapy is moderately toxic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Radiation therapy morbidity in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: dosimetric and clinical correlation

PURPOSE

To quantitate the impact of total doses of irradiation, dose rate, and ratio of doses to bladder or rectum and point A on sequelae in patients treated with irradiation alone for cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records were reviewed of 1456 patients (Stages IB-IVA) treated with external-beam irradiation plus two low-dose rate intracavitary insertions to deliver 70 to 90 Gy to point A. Follow-up was obtained in 98% of patients (median, 11 years; minimum, 3 years; maximum, 30 years). The relationships among various dosimetry parameters and Grade 2 or 3 sequelae were analyzed.

RESULTS

In Stage IB, the frequency of patients developing Grade 2 morbidity was 9%, and Grade 3 morbidity, 5%; in Stages IIA, IIB, III, and IVA, Grade 2 morbidity was 10% to 12% and Grade 3 was 10%. The most frequent Grade 2 sequelae were cystitis and proctitis (0.7% to 3%). The most common Grade 3 sequelae were vesicovaginal fistula (0.6% to 2% in patients with Stage I-III tumors), rectovaginal fistula (0.8% to 3%), and intestinal obstruction (0.8% to 4%). In the bladder, doses below 80 Gy correlated with less than 3% incidence of morbidity and 5% with higher doses (p = 0.31). In the rectosigmoid, the incidence of significant morbidity was less than 4% with doses below 75 Gy and increased to 9% with higher doses. For the small intestine, the incidence of morbidity was less than 1% with 50 Gy or less, 2% with 50 to 60 Gy, and 5% with higher doses to the lateral pelvic wall (p = 0.04). When the ratio of dose to the bladder or rectum in relation to point A was 0.8 or less, the incidence of rectal morbidity was 2.5% (8 of 320) vs. 7.3% (80 of 1095) with higher ratios (p < or = 0.01); bladder morbidity was 2.3% (7 of 305) and 5.8% (64 of 1110), respectively (p = 0.02). The incidence of Grade 2 and 3 bladder morbidity was 2.9% (10 of 336) when the dose rate was less than 0.80 Gy/h, in contrast to 6.1% (62 of 1010) with higher dose rates (p = 0.07). Rectal morbidity was 2% to 5% in Stage IB, regardless of dose rate to the rectum; in Stages IIA-B and III, morbidity was 5.2% (28 of 539) with a dose rate of 0.80 Gy or less and 10.7% (37 of 347) with higher dose rates (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that dose to the rectal point was the only factor influencing rectosigmoid sequelae, and dose to the bladder point affected bladder morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Various dosimetric parameters correlate closely with the incidence of significant morbidity in patients treated with definitive irradiation for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Careful dosimetry and special attention to related factors will reduce morbidity to the lowest possible level without compromising pelvic tumor control.

Biologic variables in the outcome of stages I and II neuroblastoma treated with surgery as primary therapy: a children's cancer group study

PURPOSE

To determine prospectively whether surgery alone is sufficient therapy for Evans stages I and II neuroblastoma and to define biologic and clinical features having prognostic potential for this group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1989 and August 1995, 374 eligible children (age range, 0 to 18 years) with newly diagnosed stage I (n = 141) and stage II (n = 233) neuroblastoma were registered onto Children's Cancer Group trial 3881. Surgical resection was the only primary therapy except in cases with spinal cord compression, where radiation therapy was allowed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by life-table methods according to clinical and biologic features.

RESULTS

EFS and OS (mean +/- SE) for all stage I patients were 93% +/- 3.0% and 99% +/- 1.0%, respectively, compared with 81% +/- 4.0% and 98% +/- 2. 0%, respectively, for stage II patients. The significantly higher recurrence rate among stage II patients was managed successfully in 38 of 43 children with either surgery or multimodality treatment. There was one death among stage I patients and six among stage II. For stage II patients tumor MYCN gene amplication, unfavorable histopathology, an age greater than 2 years, and positive lymph nodes predicted a lower OS (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

Children with stages I and II neuroblastoma have 98% survival with surgery alone as primary therapy. Supplemental treatment was necessary in only 10% of stage I patients and 20% of stage II patients. In children with localized neuroblastoma, a subset of patients that are at higher risk for death can be defined as those with stage II disease who have tumor MYCN amplification or who are >/= 2 years of age with either unfavorable histopathology or positive lymph nodes.

Randomized phase III study comparing irradiation and hyperthermia with irradiation alone in superficial measurable tumors. Final report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

A total of 307 patients with superficial measurable tumors were registered on a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol involving fractionated radiation therapy, either alone or followed immediately by hyperthermia (42.5 degrees C, 45-60 min). Overall complete response (CR) was observed in 30% of the lesions treated with radiotherapy (RT) and 32% of those receiving RT and heat. Response was found to be significantly related to both maximum tumor diameter (less than 3 or greater than or equal to 3 cm) and site/histology (breast/adenocarcinoma, head and neck/squamous, or other site/histologies). In tumors less than 3 cm in diameter in the breast, trunk, and extremities, a better CR rate was noted with irradiation and heat (62 and 67%) than with irradiation alone (40 and 0%). However, in the head and neck there was only minimal difference in CR with irradiation alone or combined with hyperthermia (50 vs 38%). In lesions less than 3 cm treated with irradiation and heat, there was improved local control. In lesions greater than 3 cm, there was no difference in local control between the two treatment arms. The higher response rate in patients with smaller lesions (less than 3 cm) may be explained by the fact that these tumors are easier to heat. Problems in correlating tumor response with quality of heating include less than optimal heating in larger lesions and the limited ability of current thermometry to map the temperature distribution in a tumor. Acute and late toxicities in both treatment arms were comparable, except for an overall 30% incidence of thermal blisters in the heated tumors.

Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a 20-year experience

A retrospective analysis is reported on the results of irradiation alone in the treatment of 970 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The development of the radiation therapy techniques, survival, pelvic tumor control, and major sequelae of therapy are described in detail. The tumor-free 5-year survival rate was 100% in 29 patients with stage IA, 85% in 312 cases with stage IB, 70% in 98 patients with stage IIA, 68% in 276 patients with stage IIB, 45% in 237 stage III cases, and one survivor in 18 stage IV patients. No pelvic recurrences or distant metastases were observed in stage IA patients. In stage IB the overall incidence of pelvic recurrences was 7.3%, in stages IIA and IIB 14%, and in stage III 37%. Distant metastases were noted in 13% of the patients with stage IB, 22% of those with stages IIA and IIB, and 32% of patients with stage III tumors. Higher doses of irradiation delivered with intracavitary insertions and extenal beam were correlated with a lower incidence of pelvic recurrences in stages IIA, IIB, and III. However, doses to point A over 7000 cGy did not improve pelvic tumor control in stage IB. Grade 2 treatment sequelae were observed in about 10% of all patients and grade 3 complications in approximately 4% of the patients with stage I and 8% in those with more advanced tumors (IIA and beyond). The need is emphasized to carefully evaluate the dosimetric aspects of new techniques, including phantom studies before they are applied to patients. A close integration of external and intracavitary irradiation will result in better tumor control and fewer complications.

Irradiation alone or combined with surgery in stage IB, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of uterine cervix: update of a nonrandomized comparison

PURPOSE

Definitive radiation therapy alone or combined with surgery in carcinoma of the uterine cervix yields comparable tumor control and survival in Stages I and IIA when patients are adequately treated with either modality. Our 30-year institutional experience is described.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a nonrandomized comparison of treatment results of 415 patients with Stage IB, 137 with Stage IIA, and 340 with Stage IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone and 197 with Stage IB, 44 with Stage IIA, and 65 with limited Stage IIB treated with pre- or postoperative irradiation and surgery. Irradiation alone consisted of a combination of external beam therapy and intracavitary insertions to deliver doses of 70 to 85 Gy to point A for patients with Stages IB and IIA disease and 80 to 90 Gy for patients with bulky or Stage IIB tumors. For patients treated with irradiation and surgery, various combinations of external beam and intracavitary therapy were used to deliver 60 to 75 Gy to point A. Surgical procedures consisted of radical hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection in 130 patients with Stage IB, 28 patients with Stage IIA, and 10 patients with limited Stage IIB. Fifty-seven patients had total abdominal or conservative hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection, and 3 had vaginal hysterectomy. In addition, 51 patients with Stage IIB tumors underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy after definitive irradiation.

RESULTS

The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates for patients with Stage IB nonbulky tumors treated with irradiation alone or irradiation combined with surgery were 90 and 85%, respectively, and the 10-year survival rate was 84% with either modality. In patients with bulky tumors (> 5 cm), the 5-year CSS rates were 61% with irradiation alone and 63% with irradiation plus surgery; at 10 years the rates were 61 and 68%, respectively (p = 0.5). For those with Stage IIA nonbulky tumors, the 5-year CSS rates were 75% with irradiation alone and 83% with combined irradiation and surgery, and 10-year CSS rates were 66 and 71%, respectively. In patients with Stage IIA bulky tumors, the 5-year CSS rates were 69% with irradiation alone and 60% with irradiation plus surgery, and at 10 years, 69 and 44%, respectively (p = 0.05). In patients with Stage IIB nonbulky tumors treated with irradiation alone or combined with surgery, the 5- and 10-year CCS rates were 72 and 65%, respectively; the corresponding survival rates with bulky tumors or bilateral parametrial involvement were 56 and 50%. Incidence of pelvic failures, alone or with distant metastasis, for Stage IB was 10% (43 out of 415) with irradiation alone and 14% (28 of 197) with irradiation plus surgery; for Stage IIA, 17% (23 out of 137) with irradiation alone and 20% (9 our of 44) with irradiation plus surgery; and for Stage IIB, 23% (88 out of 391) with irradiation alone and 29% (4 out of 14) with irradiation plus surgery. Grade 3 sequelae were comparable in both groups (irradiation alone, 5% to 11%; irradiation combined with surgery, 8% to 12%); the differences are not statistically significant. The most frequent major sequelae in 892 patients receiving irradiation only were rectovaginal fistula (13 cases, 1.5%), proctitis (10, 1.1%), small bowel obstruction (16, 1.8%), ureteral stricture (16, 1.8%), and vesicovaginal fistula (8, 0.9%). In 306 patients treated with irradiation plus surgery, the most commonly recorded major sequelae were small bowel obstruction/perforation (13 cases, 4.2%), ureteral stricture (8, 2.6%), vesicovaginal fistula (5, 1.6%), and rectovaginal fistula (4, 1.3%).

CONCLUSION

Irradiation alone or combined with surgery yields comparable pelvic tumor control, survival, and morbidity in patients with Stage IB, IIA, and limited IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Impact of dose in outcome of irradiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: analysis of two different methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 1211 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix with a minimum follow-up of 3 years treated with irradiation alone. The pelvic failure rates by stage were 9.6% for IB, 18.6% for IIA, 23% for IIB, 41% for III, and 75% for Stage IVA disease. External beam and intracavitary irradiation doses to point A and pelvic lymph nodes were calculated. In patients with Stage IB and IIA disease there was no significant correlation between doses to these points and pelvic tumor control. In Stage IIB doses of less than 6000 cGy to point A correlated with a high pelvic failure rate (8 of 12, 66.7%) in contrast to doses of 6000 to 9000 cGy (61 of 261, 23.4%) or higher than 9000 cGy (10 of 74, 13.5%) (p less than or equal to 0.01). In Stage III the pelvic failure rate with doses below 6000 cGy to point A was 72% (18 of 25) compared to 39% (71 of 180) for 6000 to 9000 cGy or 35% (27 of 77) with doses above 9000 cGy (p less than or equal to 0.01). TDF calculation of doses was carried out. In Stage IB and IIA there was no significant correlation between TDF to point A and probability of pelvic recurrence. In Stage IIB with TDF below 135, the pelvic recurrence rate was 41.6% (20 of 48) compared to 20% (61 of 305) with higher TDF (p less than or equal to 0.01). In Stage III the pelvic failure rate was 51% with TDF below 160 (70 of 136) in comparison with 29.5% (46 of 156) with higher TDF (p less than or equal to 0.01). Grade 2 sequelae of therapy were noted in about 10% of the patients and grade 3 in 4.7% of patients with Stage IB (18 of 384), 10.2% (12 of 128) with Stage IIA, 9.3% (33 of 353) with Stage IIB, and 8.2% (24 of 293) with Stage III disease. Doses from external beam and intracavitary irradiation to the rectum or the bladder neck were calculated. The actuarial incidence of major rectal or rectosigmoid sequelae was 2% to 4% with doses to the rectum of 6000 to 8000 cGy, 7% to 8% with 8000 to 9500 cGy, and 13% with doses higher than 9500 cGy (p less than or equal to 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Factors affecting long-term outcome of irradiation in carcinoma of the vagina

OBJECTIVE

This report evaluates prognostic and technical factors affecting outcome of patients with primary carcinoma of the vagina treated with definitive radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was performed on records of 212 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina treated with irradiation.

RESULTS

Tumor stage was the most significant prognostic factor; actuarial 10-year disease-free survival was 94% for Stage 0 (20 patients), 80% for Stage I (59 patients), 55% for Stage IIA (63 patients), 35% for Stage IIB (34 patients), 38% for Stage III (20 patients), and 0% for Stage IV (15 patients). All in situ lesions except one were controlled with intracavitary therapy. Of the patients with Stage I disease, 86% showed no evidence of vaginal or pelvic recurrence; most of them received interstitial or intracavitary therapy or both, and the addition of external-beam irradiation did not significantly increase survival or tumor control. In Stage IIA (paravaginal extension) and IIB (parametrial involvement) 66% and 56% of the tumors, respectively, were controlled with a combination of brachytherapy and external-beam irradiation; 13 of 20 (65%) Stage III tumors were controlled in the pelvis. Four patients with Stage IV disease (27%) had no recurrence in the pelvis. The total incidence of distant metastases was 13% in Stage I, 30% in Stage IIA, 52% in Stage IIB, 50% in Stage III, and 47% in Stage IV. The dose of irradiation delivered to the primary tumor or the parametrial extension was of relative importance in achieving successful results. In patients with Stage I disease, brachytherapy alone achieved the same local tumor control (80-100%) as in patients receiving external pelvic irradiation (78-100%) as well. In Stage II and III there was a trend toward better tumor control (57-80%) with combined external irradiation and brachytherapy than with the latter alone (33-50%) (p = 0.42). The incidence of grade 2-3 complications (12%) correlated with the stage of the tumor and type of treatment given.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is an effective treatment for patients with vaginal carcinoma, particularly Stage I. More effective irradiation techniques, including optimization of dose distribution combining external irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy in tumors beyond Stage I, are necessary to enhance locoregional tumor control. The high incidence of distant metastases emphasizes the need for earlier diagnosis and effective systemic cytotoxic agents to improve survival in these patients.

Analysis of pelvic tumor control and impact on survival in carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiation therapy alone

A total of 1054 patients with histologically confirmed invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated with radiation therapy alone between 1959 and 1982. All patients are available for a minimum of 3 years follow-up. Radiation therapy consisted of external irradiation to the whole pelvis (1000-2000 cGy) and parametria (for a total of 4000-6000 cGy) combined with two intracavitary radioactive source insertions (6000-7500 cGy to point A). Patients with Stage IIB, III, and IVA have been consistently treated with somewhat higher doses of external irradiation and intracavitary insertions. A small group of 54 patients with Stage IIB or IIIB had pelvic lymphadenectomy following the irradiation (1960-1964). There was a strong correlation between the tumor regression within 30 days from completion of radiotherapy and the incidence of pelvic recurrences or distant metastases for each of the anatomical stages. The 10-year survival rate for Stage IB was 76%, Stage IIA 60%, Stage IIB 45%, and Stage III 25%. Many of the deaths were due to intercurrent disease. Thus, the 10-year tumor-free survival was 80% for Stage IB, 60% for Stages IIA and IIB and 35% for Stage III. In Stage IB total doses of 6000 cGy or higher to point A resulted in 94% pelvic tumor control. In Stage IIA, the pelvic tumor control was 87% with doses of 6000 cGy to point A or higher. However, in Stage IIB the pelvic tumor control was 58% with doses below 6000 cGy, 78% with 6001-7500 cGy and 82% with higher doses. In Stage IIIB the pelvic tumor control was 42% with doses below 6000 cGy, 57% with 6001-7500 cGy and 68% with higher doses. Tumor control in the pelvis was correlated with the following 5 year survivals: Stage IB-95% (353 patients); Stage IIA-84% (116 patients); Stage IIB-84% (308 patients); Stage IIIB-74% (245 patients). The 5-year survival for patients that recurred in the pelvis was 30% for Stage IB, about 15% for Stages IIA-B and only 5% in Stage III. Patients with tumor control in the pelvis had a significantly lower incidence of distant metastases than patients who initially failed in the pelvis (9.3% vs. 58.6% in Stage IB, 21.6% vs 52.6% in Stage IIA, 19.8% vs 16.7% in Stage IIB, and 31.2% vs 50% in Stage III). In Stage IIB the figures were 19.8% and 16.7% because the initial pelvic recurrence was frequently concurrent with distant metastases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Definitive irradiation in carcinoma of the vagina: long-term evaluation of results

A retrospective analysis of 165 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina is reported. Actuarial disease-free 10-year survival was: Stage 0 (16 patients)--94%, Stage I (50 patients)--75%, Stage IIA (49 patients)--55%, Stage IIB (26 patients)--43%, Stage III (16 patients)--32%, Stage IV (8 patients)--0%. All but one of the in situ lesions were controlled with intracavitary therapy. Of the patients with Stage I disease, 86% showed no evidence of vaginal or pelvic recurrence. Most of them received interstitial or intracavitary therapy or both; the addition of external beam irradiation did not significantly increase survival or tumor control. In Stage IIA (paravaginal extension) 61% of the tumors were controlled with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam irradiation. Ten of 16 Stage III tumors were controlled in the pelvis. Two of the patients with Stage IV disease had no recurrence in the pelvis with relatively high doses of irradiation. The total incidence of distant metastases was 16% in Stage I, 30.6% in Stage IIA, 46.1% in Stage IIB, 62% in Stage III, and 50% in Stage IV. The dose of irradiation delivered to the primary tumor or the parametrial extension was critical in achieving successful results. The incidence of grade 2-3 complications (12%) is correlated with the stage of the tumor and type of treatment given. More effective irradiation techniques including the optimization of dose distribution by judicious combination of external irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy will be necessary to enhance loco-regional tumor control. The high incidence of distant metastases underscores the need for earlier diagnosis and effective systemic cytotoxic agents if survival is to be significantly improved in these patients.

Management of locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. II. Inflammatory carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast has been associated with a poor prognosis. Several therapeutic approaches have been under investigation in an effort to improve outcome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 179 patients with histologically confirmed inflammatory carcinoma of the breast: 33 treated with irradiation alone, 35 with combined irradiation and chemotherapy, 25 with irradiation and surgery, and 86 with a combination of three modalities.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 40% for patients treated with three modalities, 24% for those treated with irradiation and surgery, and 6% for those treated with irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy without a surgical procedure. The 10-year DFS rates were 35%, 24%, and 0%, respectively. Cause specific survival (CSS) curves closely follow the same trends. A clearly superior locoregional tumor control was observed in patients who underwent a surgical procedure: 79% with three modalities, 76% with irradiation and surgery, and only 30% with irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Distant metastasis occurred in 57% of the group treated with triple-modality therapy, 60% of those treated with irradiation plus surgery, and 85% of the patients treated with irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy. There was no significant correlation between the type of mastectomy or doses of irradiation and locoregional tumor control or survival. The significant morbidity of the trimodal therapy (10%), although somewhat higher than that of other modalities (3.2%), was acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of mastectomy to irradiation significantly improved locoregional tumor control, DFS, and CSS; differences were statistically significant. The combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and irradiation had a significant impact on locoregional tumor control and incidence of distant metastases compared with surgery plus irradiation, and a lesser impact, although still statistically significant, on DFS and CSS. Further clinical trials are needed to optimize the management of patients with inflammatory breast cancer.

Technical factors affecting morbidity in definitive irradiation for localized carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

The impact of some technical factors on morbidity was analyzed in 738 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of all patients were reviewed, and morbidity of irradiation was evaluated according to severity. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 years (median observation, 6.5 years).

RESULTS

The most frequent Grade 2 (moderate) intestinal complication was proctitis, which was observed in 5% of the patients, followed by enteritis (1%) and anal-rectal fibrosis or stricture (about 1%). Incidence of Grade 3 (severe) proctitis was less than 1% and small bowel obstruction, 0.2%. One patient developed radiation-induced ileitis complicated with peritonitis, which was fatal. The most frequent Grade 2 urinary complication was urethral stricture (5%) and cystitis with significant symptoms or hematuria (2%). A vesicosigmoid and a rectovesical fistula (.4%) were noted, which required colostomy. One patient with hemorrhagic cystitis (.2%) required an ileal bladder, and two cases of ureteral stricture (.3%) required surgical correction. Most cases of Grade 2-3 intestinal or urinary morbidity appeared within 2-5 years after therapy (8% moderate and 3% severe cumulative intestinal morbidity at 10 years, and 9% and 3%, urinary). The actuarial incidence of rectosigmoid Grade 2 and 3 morbidity was 10% for patients treated to the pelvic lymph nodes and the prostate and 3% for those treated to the prostate only (p = 0.04). The difference in urinary morbidity in these two groups of patients was not statistically significant. There was also no significant correlation of morbidity with boost portal size for prostate irradiation. Patients treated with a stationary portal technique that delivered higher doses to the urinary bladder had a significantly greater incidence of urinary morbidity (18% cumulative) compared with patients treated with rotational techniques (5%) (p < 0.1). However, patients treated with pelvic fields and rotational techniques had a higher intestinal and rectosigmoid morbidity (11%) than patients treated to the prostate only (< or = 5%) (p = 0.05). No statistically significant difference in intestinal or urinary morbidity was related to doses of irradiation (60-70 Gy).

CONCLUSION

Volume treated and, to a lesser extent, dose of irradiation at tolerance levels are important factors influencing significant morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive irradiation. With recent advances in three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning and conformal radiation therapy techniques, it is imperative to precisely determine optimal volumes and doses of irradiation required to achieve the highest local-pelvic tumor control while minimizing morbidity to enhance the role of irradiation in the management of localized carcinoma of the prostate.