Systemic treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the lack of immunohistochemical expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (EGFR2). Most TNBC has a basal-like molecular phenotype by gene expression profiling and shares clinical and pathological features with hereditary BRCA1 related breast cancers. This review evaluates the activity of available chemotherapy and targeted agents in TNBC. A systematic review of PubMed and conference databases was carried out to identify randomised clinical trials reporting outcomes in women with TNBC treated with chemotherapy and targeted agents. Our review identified TNBC studies of chemotherapy and targeted agents with different mechanisms of action, including induction of synthetic lethality and inhibition of angiogenesis, growth and survival pathways. TNBC is sensitive to taxanes and anthracyclins. Platinum agents are effective in TNBC patients with BRCA1 mutation, either alone or in combination with poly adenosine diphosphate polymerase 1 inhibitors. Combinations of ixabepilone and capecitabine have added to progression-free survival (PFS) without survival benefit in metastatic TNBC. Antiangiogenic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy produced only modest gains in PFS and had little impact on survival. TNBC subgroups respond differentially to specific targeted agents. In future, the treatment needs to be tailored for a specific patient, depending on the molecular characteristics of their malignancy. TNBC being a chemosensitive entity, combination with targeted agents have not produced substantial improvements in outcomes. Appropriate patient selection with rationale combinations of targeted agents is needed for success.

Comparison of Toxicity and Cosmetic Outcomes After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation or Whole Breast Irradiation Using 3-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

To compare rates of acute and late skin toxicities and cosmetic outcomes after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) or whole breast irradiation (WBI) using 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy in women with breast cancer after breast conservation surgery (BCS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Women >35 years of age with invasive or noninvasive breast cancer ≤4 cm treated by BCS were randomized to 3D-CRT APBI (34 Gy/10 fractions/5 days) or WBI (40 Gy/16 fractions/3 weeks ± boost irradiation). The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Important secondary outcomes were skin toxicities using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scores, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force and Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic scales, and adverse cosmetic outcome. This interim analysis focuses on the secondary endpoints of radiation toxicities and cosmesis. Patient and tumor characteristics and rates of adverse cosmetic outcomes and skin toxicities were compared using Fisher exact tests. All statistical tests were 2 sided, with P < .05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Between June 2011 and December 2015, 133 women with breast cancer were randomized to 3D-CRT APBI or WBI. Patient and tumor characteristics were balanced between the 2 arms. Median follow-up was 60 months (range, 12-93 months). Grade 4 late toxicity was not seen in either of the treatment arms, and grade 3 toxicity was very low for each endpoint assessed in both the groups. The rates of grade ≥2 acute dermatitis were 8% and 15%, respectively, for APBI and WBI (P = .18). Rates of grade ≥1 late radiation toxicities were higher in the WBI arm compared with the APBI arm for breast shrinkage (P = .008), pigmentation (P = .028), fibrosis (P = .040), induration (P = .048), and edema (P = .33). Adverse cosmesis at last follow-up was significantly higher in patients treated with WBI: 33% compared with 6% with APBI (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with breast cancer after BCS, APBI was associated with better cosmetic outcome and fewer late radiation toxicities than WBI.

Late-term effects of hypofractionated chest wall and regional nodal radiotherapy with two-dimensional technique in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is becoming a new standard in postoperative treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer after breast conservation surgery. However, data on hypofractionation in patients with advanced stage disease who undergo mastectomy followed by local and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is lacking. In this retrospective study, we report late-term effects of 3 weeks post-mastectomy hypofractionated local and RNI with two-dimensional (2D) technique in patients with stage II and III breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and December 2007, 1,770 women with breast cancer who were given radical treatment with mastectomy, systemic therapy and RT at least 10 years ago were included. RT dose was 35 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to chest wall by two tangential fields and 40 Gy in same fractions to supraclavicular fossa (SCF) and internal mammary nodes (IMNs). SCF and IMNs dose was prescribed at dmax and 3 cm depth, respectively. Chemotherapy and hormonal therapy was given in 64% and 74% patients, respectively. Late-term toxicities were assessed with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scores and LENT-SOMA scales (the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic scales).

RESULTS

Mean age was 48 years (range, 19 to 75 years). Median follow-up was 12 years (range, 10 to 27 years). Moderate/marked arm/shoulder pain was reported by 254 (14.3%) patients. Moderate/marked shoulder stiffness was reported by 219 (12.3%) patients. Moderate/marked arm edema was seen in 131 (7.4%) patients. Brachial plexopathy was not seen in any patient. Rib fractures were noted in 6 (0.3%) patients. Late cardiac and lung toxicity was seen in 29 (1.6%) and 23 (1.3%) patients, respectively. Second malignancy developed in 105 (5.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

RNI with 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks hypofractionation with 2D technique seems safe and comparable to historical data of conventional fractionation (ClinicalTrial.gov Registration No. XXXX).

Accelerated hypofractionated breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 27 patients after breast-conserving surgery were included in this study. Patients were planned on a four-dimensional computerized tomogram, and contouring was done using RTOG guidelines. The dose was 34 Gy/10#/2 week to the breast and 40 Gy/10#/2 week to the tumor bed as SIB with volumetric modulated arc technique. The primary endpoint was grade 2 acute skin toxicity. Doses to the organs-at-risk were calculated. Toxicities and cosmesis were assessed using RTOG/LENT/SOMA and HARVARD/NSABP/RTOG grading scales, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Left and right breast cancers were seen in 17 (63%) and 10 (37%) patients, respectively. The mean values of ipsilateral lung V16 and contralateral lung V5 were 16.01% and 3.74%, respectively. The mean heart doses from the left and right breast were 7.25 Gy and 4.37 Gy, respectively. The mean doses to the contralateral breast, oesophagus, and Dmax to brachial plexus were 2.64 Gy, 3.69 Gy, and 26.95 Gy, respectively. The mean value of thyroid V25 was 19.69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute skin toxicities were observed in 9 (33%) and 5 (18.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 2 hyperpigmentation, edema, and induration were observed in 1 (3.7%), 2 (7.4%), and 4 (14.8%) patients, respectively. Mild breast pain and arm/shoulder discomfort were reported by 1 (3.4%) patient. The median follow-up was 51 months (range, 12 to 61 months). At four years, breast induration, edema, and fibrosis were observed in 1 (3.7%) patient. Cosmesis was excellent and good in 21 (78%) and 6 (22%) patients, respectively. Local recurrence and distant metastases occurred in 1 (3.7%) and 2 (7.4%) patients, respectively. DFS and OS at four years were 88% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With this radiotherapy schedule, acute and late toxicity rates were acceptable with no adverse cosmesis. Local control, DFS, and OS were good.

HYPofractionated Adjuvant RadioTherapy in 1 versus 2 weeks in high-risk patients with breast cancer (HYPART): a non-inferiority, open-label, phase III randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Radiotherapy is an important part of breast cancer treatment after surgery. Breast cancer radiotherapy is usually delivered in 3-5 weeks. This is a long duration for women with breast cancer to stay away from the family and work. We wanted to reduce this duration so that the wages loss and the logistics can be minimised for these patients. Hypofractionation, i.e. high dose per fraction, is delivered in a smaller number of days. In this study, we will compare a 1-week schedule of hypofractionated adjuvant whole breast/chest wall and/or regional nodal radiotherapy against 2 weeks for locoregional disease control, toxicities, quality of life (QoL), survival and second cancers after primary surgery in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) will be treated with a radiotherapy dose of 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week in the study arm and 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in the control arm. The primary endpoint of this noninferiority study will be locoregional tumour control. Secondary endpoints will be early and late radiation toxicities, quality of life, contralateral primary tumours, regional and distant metastases, survival and second cancers. A total of 1018 patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive 1 week or 2 weeks of radiotherapy. An event-driven analysis will be performed after at least 94 patients have documented locoregional recurrences. Acute radiation toxicity will be assessed and scaled according to the RTOG grading system. Late radiation toxicity will be assessed with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scale. Cosmetic assessment will be done using Harvard/NSABP/RTOG breast cosmesis grading scale at baseline and 3 and 5 years. QoL will be assessed with EORTC QLQ-30 and EORTC QLQ-BR 23 at baseline and 3 and 5 years.

DISCUSSION

Hypofractionation reduces treatment time to half while maintaining breast cosmesis and gives control rates equal to conventional fractionation. This is possible because breast tissue can tolerate high dose per fraction. In this study, we presume that 1-week radiotherapy will be non-inferior to 2 week radiotherapy, i.e. disease control will be similar with both the schedules without additional side effects, and QoL of these patients will be maintained. If we are able to achieve these outcomes, then patients will be able to complete their radiotherapy in less duration. There is not much data on regional nodal irradiation with hypofraction in breast cancer. We have used hypofraction for regional nodal irradiation in the past and not encountered any safety issue. If we are able to prove that late-term effects are comparable in the two schedules, it will make the radiation oncologist confident about hypofractionation in breast cancer. As breast cancer is a leading cancer in females and radiation therapy is an integral part of its local management, hypofractionation will help radiation centres worldwide to meet the growing need for radiation treatment in breast cancer, particularly in developing countries where resources are limited. It will also reduce the financial burden on the patient and family. Since we will treat these patients with both simple and complex radiotherapy techniques, it will also be possible for the low-income countries to follow this trial without needing a high-end or expensive radiotherapy equipment as the planning and treatment process will be very simple.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04472845 and CTRI with REF/2020/09/037050.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India

BACKGROUND

Young women with breast cancer (BC) are not represented in the trials on hypofractionation. In this study we compared outcomes in young patients with BC to their older counterparts treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in a regional cancer centre in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1990 to December 2010, women with BC, treated with hypofractionated RT dose of 35-40 Gy/15#/3 weeks were divided into two groups, ≤ 35 years and > 35 years. Outcomes compared were locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. LRRFS, DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of total 2244 patients, 359 were ≤ 35 years of age and 1885 were > 35 years. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except that comorbidities were significantly higher in the > 35 years age group, more patients aged ≤ 35 years had nodal N3 disease, received chemotherapy and RT to internal mammary nodes and more patients in the > 35 years group received hormonal therapy. Median follow up was 10 years (range 1-30 years). LRR and distant metastases were comparable between the two groups. However, synchronous LRR and distant metastases were significantly higher in the ≤ 35 years group 18 (5.1%) as compared to the > 35 years group 39 (2.1%) with p = 0.018. Estimated 10-year LRRFS, DFS and OS were 92% vs. 94% (p = 0.95), 68% vs. 73%(p = 0.058) and 78% vs. 76% (p = 0.10) in ≤ 35 years and > 35 years, respectively. OS for stage 1 was comparable between the two groups. However, for stage 2 and 3 it was 77% vs. 82% (p = 0.048) and 53% vs. 62% (p = 0.045) in the ≤ 35 years and > 35 years group, respectively. Acute and late toxicity were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Young BC patients had higher LRR and distant metastases. LRRFS, DFS and toxicities were comparable between the two groups. However, OS was poorer in young BC patients with stage 2 and 3 disease.

Breast cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2-weeks with 2D technique: 5-year clinical outcomes of a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

To report clinical outcomes and late toxicities of a 2-week hypofractionated post-operative loco-regional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with gov, no. NCT02460744. Between June 2013 and October 2014, 50 patients with breast cancer, post mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) were included in this study, of whom 10 had BCS. Patients were planned on a 2-dimentional (2D) simulator with 2 tangential fields and an incident supraclavicular field. Radiotherapy dose was 34 Gy/10#/2 weeks and a sequential boost of 10 Gy/5#/1 wk in BCS patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute skin toxicities previously reported. Here, we report the secondary end points of late toxicities, cosmesis, local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Late skin toxicities were recorded according to the Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring criteria. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/RTOG breast cosmesis and the Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scales for the breast and chest wall, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS and OS were calculated, and 5-year DFS and OS rates (with approximate 95% CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Late grade ≥ 2 chest wall induration, hypopigmentation and subcutaneous fibrosis were seen in 3 (6%), 3 (6%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Chest wall cosmesis was excellent/good in 34 (72%) and fair/bad in 13 (28%) patients. In BCS patients, grade 2 skin induration, subcutaneous fibrosis and edema was observed in 1 patient (11%) each. Cosmesis was excellent/good in 7 (78%) and fair/bad in 2 (22%) patients. Late grade ≥ 2 arm edema, pain and shoulder stiffness were reported by 1 (2%), 2 (4%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. No local recurrences were observed. Five patients developed distant metastases (10%). Seven patients died (14%). The 5-year DFS and OS rate was 90% (95% CI: 77-96%) and 88% (95% CI: 75-94%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2 weeks in patients with breast cancer was associated with minimal late toxicity, good cosmetic outcome and excellent local control. This trial may be of relevance for developing countries where resources are limited.

Preliminary results of hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer in Chandigarh, India: single-centre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Globally, most of the randomised trials with hypofractionation in patients with breast cancer have used 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT). As facilities for 3D-CRT technique may not be available in low-resource settings, there is a need to see if hypofractionation is feasible and safe with 2-dimensional (2-D) technique. In this study, we compared a 3-week radiation schedule with a 2-week schedule of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer with 2-D technique.

METHODS

The current study was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Patients with breast cancer, stage I-III, post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery who needed adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy were randomised in the Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India; to 34Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks (2-week arm) or 35Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to the chest wall and 40Gy/15#/3wks to breast and supraclavicular fossa (3-week arm). Boost dose when indicated was 8-10Gy/2-4#/2-4 days in both the arms. Patients were planned on a 2-dimensional (2D) simulator with 2 tangential fields to breast/chest wall and incident supraclavicular fossa field. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading scale. Assessments were carried out weekly during radiotherapy and at 4 weeks after treatment by the physician. Cosmetic outcome was assessed using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/RTOG scale. The toxicity rates between the two arms were compared using Fisher's exact tests. The trial was approved by institutional ethics committee and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04075058.

FINDINGS

This study included 1121 eligible patients from June 2015 to December 2020. Median follow-up was 35 months (6-84 months). Mean age was 48 years (24-75 years). The patient characteristics were comparable between the two arms except for more mastectomies in the 3-week arm and more node-positive patients in the 2-week arm. There were more oestrogen receptor-positive tumors in the 3-week arm. Acute skin toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity was 100 (18%) and 82 (15%); and 16 (3%) and 12 (2%) in the 3-week and 2-week arm (p = 0.21), respectively. Cosmetic outcome was assessed as Excellent or Good for 89% of patients in the 3-week arm as compared to 94% in the 2-week arm (p = 0.004).

INTERPRETATION

The two radiation schedules were comparable in terms of acute skin toxicity. The cosmetic outcome was better with the 2-week schedule. The preliminary findings indicate 2-week radiotherapy schedule with 2-D technique was better than the 3-week schedule in patients with breast cancer. However, disease outcomes and late-term toxicities need to be further checked.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India.

Primary Bone Lymphoma: An Experience of a Regional Cancer Center from India

Background  Primary bone lymphoma (PBL) is a rare disease, representing <5% of all extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). The optimal treatment strategy is still unclear. Here, we report our institutional outcome analysis of patients diagnosed with PBL. Materials and Methods  From 2007 to 2014, the medical records of 22 patients with PBL were reviewed. Analysis was done for symptom-, patient-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics. All patients were treated with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Treatment response and impact of different prognostic factors on clinical outcome were analyzed. Results  The median age of presentation was 44 years (range: 18-70 years). A total of 19 (86.4%) patients were ≤60 years of age and 3 (13.6%) patients were >60 years. Out of all, 18 were males and 4 were females. Ann Arbor clinical staging at diagnosis was Stage I in 13 (59.1%), Stage II in 3 (13.6%), Stage III in 2 (9.1%), and Stage IV in 4 (18.2%) patients. Spine was the most common site of involvement seen in 12 (54.5%) patients. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma histology was seen in 8 (36.4%) patients and 8 (36.4%) had high-grade NHL. Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone was given to 20 (90.9%) patients, whereas 2 (9.1%) patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab. Radiotherapy (30-40 Gy) was delivered to 19 (86.4%) patients. The median follow-up period was 40 months (range: 8-105 months). The overall response rate was 86.3% with complete response (CR) in 15 (68.1%) and partial response in 4 (18.2%) patients. Relapses were seen in three (13.5%) patients: two nodal, and one in the bone. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 56.6 and 72.7%, respectively. CR after initial treatment was associated with a significant better OS, 80 and 25%, respectively ( p < 0.0001). Age, sex, stage, International Prognostic Index, histologic subtype, and number of sites had no significant influence on OS. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy (with or without rituximab) also did not improve the OS or DFS of patients. Conclusion  In spite of small number of patients reported in this study, conventional chemotherapy remains an effective treatment option for patients with PBL. OS was found to be affected by the initial response to treatment.

Radiotherapy dose de-escalation in patients with high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a real-world clinical practice

PURPOSE

The standard treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) comprises combined modality treatment, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy with rituximab which has significantly improved both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, there is no uniformity in radiation dose usage in these patients. In this retrospective study, we compared lower radiation dose with higher in patients with aggressive NHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2017, treatment records of all high-grade NHL or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and non-central nervous system NHL were included. We compared response rates, OS and DFS of patients who received ≤30 Gy RT to those with >30 Gy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine factors affecting prognosis, i.e., age, sex, stage, International Prognostic Index (IPI), adding rituximab, and radiation dose.

RESULTS

A total of 184 NHL patients treated with combined modality or radiation alone having complete follow-up details were analyzed. At median follow-up of 66.8 months, 5-year OS was 72.8% in high-dose group versus 69.9% in low-dose group (p = 0.772) and 5-year DFS 64.7% versus 64.1% (p = 0.871). Patients having early-stage disease receiving low dose and those with advanced disease treated with >30 Gy had better OS and DFS though not statistically significant. Adding rituximab was associated with significantly better OS and DFS irrespective of radiation dose delivered. High IPI score and omitting rituximab were the only factors that significantly worsened both OS and DFS. Acute radiation toxicities were comparable in both groups (p = 0.82). Among late toxicities, no patient developed a second malignancy and 5% died due to cardiovascular complications (p = 0.595) though only two patients (1.1%) had received thoracic radiation.

CONCLUSION

The two groups had comparable response rates, acute toxicities, DFS and OS. This study suggests that RT dose reduction may be possible in high-grade NHL without compromising the DFS and OS.