Prognostic implications of the tumor immune microenvironment and immune checkpoint pathway in primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the North Indian population

Primary central nervous system-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNS-DLBCL) is a rare, extranodal malignant lymphoma carrying poor prognosis. The prognostic impact of tumor microenvironment (TME) composition and the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway are still undetermined in PCNS-DLBCL. We aimed to quantify the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and PD-L1 expression in the PCNSL and evaluated their prognostic significance. All patients with histopathologically diagnosed PCNS-DLBCL over a period of 7 years were recruited. Immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD68, CD163, PD-1, and PD-L1 was performed on the tissue microarray. Forty-four cases of PCNS-DLBCL, who satisfied the selection criteria, were included with mean age of 55 ± 12.3 years and male-to-female ratio of 0.91:1. The mean overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 531.6 days and 409.8 days, respectively. Among TILs, an increased number of CD3+ T cells showed better OS and DFS, without achieving statistical significance. CD4 positive T-cells were significantly associated with the longer OS (p = 0.037) and DFS (p = 0.023). TAMs (68CD and CD163 positive) showed an inverse relationship with OS and DFS but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Increased PD-L1 expression in immune cells, but not in tumor cells, was associated with significantly better DFS (p = 0.037). The TME plays a significant role in the prognosis of PCNS-DLBCL. Increased number of CD4+ T cells and PD-L1-expressing immune cells is associated with better prognosis in PCNS-DLBCL. Further studies with larger sample size are required to evaluate the role of targeted therapy against the TME and immune check point inhibitors in this disease.

Male breast cancer: Outcome with adjuvant treatment

INTRODUCTION

Male breast cancer (MBC) incidence is <1%, but it is increasing. MBC incidence increases with age. There are no randomized trials on MBC because of low number of patients seen in any institution and hence its management is derived from breast cancer (BC) in women. In this study, we analyzed outcome in MBC patients with adjuvant treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2014, 81 men with BC were retrospectively analyzed for demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment outcomes. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time duration from diagnosis to first recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time duration from pathologic diagnosis to death or last follow-up with any death defined as an event. DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant treatment using log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median age was 57 years (range 30-86 years). Right, left, and bilateral BCs were seen in 41 (51%), 38 (47%), and 2 (2%) men, respectively. The mean duration of symptoms was 25 months (range 1-240 months). Comorbidity and family history was present in 31 (38%) and 3 (4%) men, respectively. The mean tumor size was 5 cm × 5 cm (range, 1 cm × 1 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm). Nipple was involved in 46 (57%) men. Early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease were seen in ??30 (37%), 34 (42%), and 17 (21%) men, respectively. Majority (71, 88%) of men had invasive ductal carcinoma histology. In radically treated 64 men, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 12 (19%) patients (fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide [FAC] to 9 and FAC + taxanes to 3), with CR in 4 (33.3%) and partial response (PR) in 8 (66.7%) patients. Mastectomy was done in 55 (86%) and wide local excision in 9 (14%) men. Margins and nodes were positive in 17 (27%) and 38 (59%) men, respectively. Estrogen receptor, PR, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu positive were seen in 27 (42%), 17 (26.5%), and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tamoxifen were received by 51 (80%), 35 (55%), and 45 (70%) men, respectively. Median follow-up was 60 months (range 4-278 months). Locoregional recurrence occurred in 8 (12.5%) and distant metastasis in 22 (34%) men, respectively. DFS and OS at 10 years were 42% and 53%, respectively. DFS and OS were significantly better in men with adjuvant radiation (54% vs. 24%, P = 0.007 and 57% vs. 35%, P = 0.022, respectively) and hormonal therapy (57% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.004 and 62% vs. 39%, P = 0.045, respectively). Chemotherapy had no impact on DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and hormonal therapy significantly improved DFS and OS in MBC patients. Chemotherapy had no impact on DFS and OS.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in carcinoma breast: What we have achieved?

Healthy breast tissue is sensitive to radiation fraction size, such that small changes in fraction size can lead to larger changes in radiation effects on these tissues. Conventional breast and/or chest wall irradiation uses 2 Gy daily fractions, for 5-6 weeks. Such a long treatment schedule has major implications on both patient quality of life and burden of radiotherapy (RT) departments. Some investigators have hypothesized that breast cancer is as sensitive as normal breast tissue to fraction size. According to the hypothesis, small fraction sizes of 2.0 Gy or less offer no therapeutic advantage, and a more effective strategy would be to deliver fewer, larger fractions that result in a lower total radiation dose. This short (hypofractionated) RT schedule would be more convenient for patients (especially those coming from remote areas to RT facilities) and for healthcare providers, as it would increase the turnover in RT departments. This thought has prompted us to write a systematic review on role of hypofractionated RT in breast cancer in a developing country like ours where patient burden is an alarming problem.

Accelerated hypofractionated breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 27 patients after breast-conserving surgery were included in this study. Patients were planned on a four-dimensional computerized tomogram, and contouring was done using RTOG guidelines. The dose was 34 Gy/10#/2 week to the breast and 40 Gy/10#/2 week to the tumor bed as SIB with volumetric modulated arc technique. The primary endpoint was grade 2 acute skin toxicity. Doses to the organs-at-risk were calculated. Toxicities and cosmesis were assessed using RTOG/LENT/SOMA and HARVARD/NSABP/RTOG grading scales, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Left and right breast cancers were seen in 17 (63%) and 10 (37%) patients, respectively. The mean values of ipsilateral lung V16 and contralateral lung V5 were 16.01% and 3.74%, respectively. The mean heart doses from the left and right breast were 7.25 Gy and 4.37 Gy, respectively. The mean doses to the contralateral breast, oesophagus, and Dmax to brachial plexus were 2.64 Gy, 3.69 Gy, and 26.95 Gy, respectively. The mean value of thyroid V25 was 19.69%. Grade 1 and 2 acute skin toxicities were observed in 9 (33%) and 5 (18.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 2 hyperpigmentation, edema, and induration were observed in 1 (3.7%), 2 (7.4%), and 4 (14.8%) patients, respectively. Mild breast pain and arm/shoulder discomfort were reported by 1 (3.4%) patient. The median follow-up was 51 months (range, 12 to 61 months). At four years, breast induration, edema, and fibrosis were observed in 1 (3.7%) patient. Cosmesis was excellent and good in 21 (78%) and 6 (22%) patients, respectively. Local recurrence and distant metastases occurred in 1 (3.7%) and 2 (7.4%) patients, respectively. DFS and OS at four years were 88% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With this radiotherapy schedule, acute and late toxicity rates were acceptable with no adverse cosmesis. Local control, DFS, and OS were good.

Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors: Survival outcomes and prognostic factors - 10 years experience from a tertiary care institute

Primary Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumor (PMGCT) is a rare and heterogeneous entity. These tumors are typically diagnosed in young adults and carry a poor prognosis. We conducted this study to evaluate the role of radiotherapy on treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in PMGCT that may allow a more adapted treatment strategy to improve survival. Case records of patients who presented with PMGCT over a period of 10-years from January-2009 to December-2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Survival analyses were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (Log-rank) method. Poor prognostic factors for survival were evaluated with Multivariate analysis using Cox-regression method. A total of 46-patients data was analyzed, the majority of the patients were males (95.7%) with a median age of 25-years (range, 17-62). Non-seminomatous histology was predominant (60.9%). Sixteen-patients (34.7%) presented with complications at their initial presentation. Majority of the patients were treated with multimodality approach using chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40.8 months, the 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 69.6%, 52.2%, and 44.7% respectively. Patients who received radiotherapy in first-line treatment showed significant improvement in 5-year OS (72% vs 30%, p = 0.004) and disease-free survival (70% vs 24%, p = 0.007) in comparison with patients who did not receive. Multivariate analysis revealed that radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and complications at presentation were independent prognostic factors for OS. PMGCTs are aggressive neoplasms especially in patients presenting with disease-related complications. Dual modality management (radiotherapy as local therapy along with chemotherapy) had shown improvement in survival.

HYPofractionated Adjuvant RadioTherapy in 1 versus 2 weeks in high-risk patients with breast cancer (HYPART): a non-inferiority, open-label, phase III randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Radiotherapy is an important part of breast cancer treatment after surgery. Breast cancer radiotherapy is usually delivered in 3-5 weeks. This is a long duration for women with breast cancer to stay away from the family and work. We wanted to reduce this duration so that the wages loss and the logistics can be minimised for these patients. Hypofractionation, i.e. high dose per fraction, is delivered in a smaller number of days. In this study, we will compare a 1-week schedule of hypofractionated adjuvant whole breast/chest wall and/or regional nodal radiotherapy against 2 weeks for locoregional disease control, toxicities, quality of life (QoL), survival and second cancers after primary surgery in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) will be treated with a radiotherapy dose of 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week in the study arm and 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in the control arm. The primary endpoint of this noninferiority study will be locoregional tumour control. Secondary endpoints will be early and late radiation toxicities, quality of life, contralateral primary tumours, regional and distant metastases, survival and second cancers. A total of 1018 patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive 1 week or 2 weeks of radiotherapy. An event-driven analysis will be performed after at least 94 patients have documented locoregional recurrences. Acute radiation toxicity will be assessed and scaled according to the RTOG grading system. Late radiation toxicity will be assessed with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scale. Cosmetic assessment will be done using Harvard/NSABP/RTOG breast cosmesis grading scale at baseline and 3 and 5 years. QoL will be assessed with EORTC QLQ-30 and EORTC QLQ-BR 23 at baseline and 3 and 5 years.

DISCUSSION

Hypofractionation reduces treatment time to half while maintaining breast cosmesis and gives control rates equal to conventional fractionation. This is possible because breast tissue can tolerate high dose per fraction. In this study, we presume that 1-week radiotherapy will be non-inferior to 2 week radiotherapy, i.e. disease control will be similar with both the schedules without additional side effects, and QoL of these patients will be maintained. If we are able to achieve these outcomes, then patients will be able to complete their radiotherapy in less duration. There is not much data on regional nodal irradiation with hypofraction in breast cancer. We have used hypofraction for regional nodal irradiation in the past and not encountered any safety issue. If we are able to prove that late-term effects are comparable in the two schedules, it will make the radiation oncologist confident about hypofractionation in breast cancer. As breast cancer is a leading cancer in females and radiation therapy is an integral part of its local management, hypofractionation will help radiation centres worldwide to meet the growing need for radiation treatment in breast cancer, particularly in developing countries where resources are limited. It will also reduce the financial burden on the patient and family. Since we will treat these patients with both simple and complex radiotherapy techniques, it will also be possible for the low-income countries to follow this trial without needing a high-end or expensive radiotherapy equipment as the planning and treatment process will be very simple.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04472845 and CTRI with REF/2020/09/037050.

Comparison of two radiation boost schedules in postlumpectomy patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We have been practicing hypofractionation, 40 Gy in 16 fractions over 3 weeks for whole breast irradiation (WBI) for the past five decades with or without boost at our center. In this study, we compared two boost schedules of 10 Gy/5#/1 week with 16 Gy/8#/1.5 weeks in postlumpectomy patients with breast cancer after WBI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2012 to June 2016, the study included 87 breast cancer patients postbreast conservation surgery. The institutional ethics committee approved the study, which was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. CT02142907). All patients were treated with WBI of 40 Gy/16#/3 weeks. WBI was followed by tumor bed boost of 10 Gy/5#/1 week in 44 patients and 16 Gy/8#/1.5 weeks in 43 patients, either with electron beam therapy or 3D CRT with photons. The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of local control between two schedules. Secondary endpoints were acute and late radiation toxicities, cosmetic score analysis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The assessment of acute and late skin toxicity was made as per RTOG scores and LENT-SOMA scale. The cosmetic assessment was made with Harvard/NSABP/RTOG Breast Cosmesis Grading Scale.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 55 months (range 18-78 months). Local recurrence was seen in 1 (2.3%) patient in the 16 Gy boost only. Acute Grade 2 skin toxicity was 33% in 16 Gy boost arm compared to 23% in 10 Gy boost arm. Late skin toxicities were also high in patients with 16 Gy boost. Grade ≥2 induration was seen in 4.5% and 14% of patients with 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost, respectively. None of the patients with 10 Gy boost had Grade 2 edema as compared to 5% with 16 Gy. Pigmentation was observed in 9% and 23% patients with 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost, respectively. Grade 1 fibrosis was 2% versus 12% in patients with 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost, respectively. The cosmetic score was good/excellent in 91% and 84% of patients with 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost, respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 2 (4%) and 3 (7%) patients in 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost, respectively. DFS and OS at 5 years were comparable between the two boost schedules.

CONCLUSION

Local control was comparable with 10 Gy and 16 Gy boost. Acute and late skin toxicities were higher with 16 Gy boost dose. The cosmetic score was better with 10 Gy boost. DFS and OS was comparable with the two boost schedules. Hence, a boost of 10 Gy/5# after WBI may be adequate in patients with breast cancer.

Pattern of care and survival in older women with breast cancer in India

Purpose:To determine the pattern of care and survival in older patients with breast cancer.

Methods:The study population included 228 women aged ≥60 years with breast cancer treated between 1992 and 2002. Analysis was done for surgery, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Outcomes studied were locoregional recurrence (LRR) distant metastases, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate DFS and OS.

Results:Mastectomy was done in 208 (91%) patients and conservative breast surgery (CBS) only in 20 (9%) patients. Majority of the patients received adjuvant RT 179 (78.5%). Chemotherapy was given to 49 (21.5%) patients and hormones to 204 (89.5%) patients. LRR with or without distant metastases was 7% and distant metastasis rate was 19.3%. DFS at 10 years was 69%. With RT, DFS was 76% in patients aged <65 years and 73% in aged ≥65 years (p= 0.13). It was 73 and 86%, respectively, with chemotherapy (p= 0.041). DFS with hormones was 96% in patients aged ≥65 years and 79% in aged <65 years (p= 0.028). The OS was 74% at 10 years. RT improved OS in all patients. OS with chemotherapy was 94% in patients ≥65 years, and 82% in patients <65 years (p= 0.044). With hormonal therapy OS was 96% in patients aged ≥65 years and 78% in patients <65 years (p= 0.020).

Conclusion:CBS rate and chemotherapy use is very low in elderly women with breast cancer in India. Adjuvant RT, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy offered a therapeutic advantage in these patients.

Outcome following radical cystectomy and bladder-preservation therapy in patients with invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder

BACKGROUND

Invasive bladder cancer is a lethal disease with a 50% cancer-related mortality even in the best healthcare systems. Optimum combination of surgery, external beam radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy has yet to be determined.

PURPOSE

To audit the outcome of multi-modality treatment and compare this with the existing literature in order to set future priorities and re-audit in patients with invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2004, 97 patients with invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder were analyzed. Radical surgery was done in 18(18%) patients and adjuvant radiation was given to 20(21%) patients. Radical radiation alone, (>/=50 Gy) was given to 26(27%) and chemoradiation to 33(34%) patients respectively. Patients in the chemoradiation arm were given the same dose of radiation with weekly concomitant cisplatin at 40 mg/ m(2) one hour before radiation during the first phase only. At a median follow-up of 32 months the outcome studied included locoregional failure, distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses. The OS and DFS were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier. Log rank test was used for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 58 years. Males comprised 93% of the total patients. Most (93%) of the patients had transitional cell histology. In patients treated with radiation alone overall response rate was 60%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 42%. The CR in patients treated with chemoradiation was 51%. Bladder was preserved in 61% of patients who received chemoradiation as compared to 42% in patients treated with radical radiation. With radical radiation local recurrence rate was 19% as compared to 22% with surgery and 6% with chemoradiation, respectively. Local recurrence rate was only 5% in patients treated with adjuvant radiation. Distant metastasis rate was least with chemoradiation (9%) as compared to 11.5% in radical radiation: curable dose of radiation and 33% with surgery alone, respectively. Patients with adjuvant radiation had a distant metastases rate of 15%. Median OS was 36 months. Factors affecting OS were histology (P = 0.023) and nodal involvement (P = 0.034). Median DFS was 26 months. Significant factors affecting DFS on univariate analysis were histology (P = 0.046) and nodal involvement (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis the only factor affecting DFS and OS was nodal involvement (P = 0.01; Hazard Ratio, 0.085-0.719).

CONCLUSION

In patients with invasive bladder cancer, combined modality in the form of radical cystectomy followed by radiation give best local control. Radiation alone is not effective to control muscle-invasive local disease; however, Chemoradiation is an effective alternative to radical cystectomy to preserve bladder function.

Radiation therapy for intractable bleeding in extremity arteriovenous malformation: considerations on a clinical case

Arteriovenous malformations are rare clinicopathological entities with varied distribution and a constellation of symptoms. In the extremities they are usually associated with dermatological manifestations, such as angiodermatitis with a potential risk of torrential haemorrhage. Surgical resection is a morbid procedure. Transcatheter embolization and sclerotherapy is an attractive alternative to surgical resection. However, proper case selection is a prerequisite and may not be possible in all the cases. The case reported here is a paradigm of a complex and extensive vascular malformation with torrential haemorrhage where a unique therapeutic approach of radiation therapy was used as an alternative to morbid surgery after embolization and sclerotherapy failure.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India

BACKGROUND

Young women with breast cancer (BC) are not represented in the trials on hypofractionation. In this study we compared outcomes in young patients with BC to their older counterparts treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in a regional cancer centre in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1990 to December 2010, women with BC, treated with hypofractionated RT dose of 35-40 Gy/15#/3 weeks were divided into two groups, ≤ 35 years and > 35 years. Outcomes compared were locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. LRRFS, DFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of total 2244 patients, 359 were ≤ 35 years of age and 1885 were > 35 years. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except that comorbidities were significantly higher in the > 35 years age group, more patients aged ≤ 35 years had nodal N3 disease, received chemotherapy and RT to internal mammary nodes and more patients in the > 35 years group received hormonal therapy. Median follow up was 10 years (range 1-30 years). LRR and distant metastases were comparable between the two groups. However, synchronous LRR and distant metastases were significantly higher in the ≤ 35 years group 18 (5.1%) as compared to the > 35 years group 39 (2.1%) with p = 0.018. Estimated 10-year LRRFS, DFS and OS were 92% vs. 94% (p = 0.95), 68% vs. 73%(p = 0.058) and 78% vs. 76% (p = 0.10) in ≤ 35 years and > 35 years, respectively. OS for stage 1 was comparable between the two groups. However, for stage 2 and 3 it was 77% vs. 82% (p = 0.048) and 53% vs. 62% (p = 0.045) in the ≤ 35 years and > 35 years group, respectively. Acute and late toxicity were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Young BC patients had higher LRR and distant metastases. LRRFS, DFS and toxicities were comparable between the two groups. However, OS was poorer in young BC patients with stage 2 and 3 disease.

Impact of age on outcomes in young women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In this study, we compared outcomes in young and very young patients with breast cancer (BC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1990 to December 2010, 414 young women (age ≤35 years) with BC were registered in the radiotherapy (RT) outpatient department. Patients were divided into young (31-35 years) and very young (18-30 years). They were compared for clinical, pathological characteristics, and treatment-related factors such as RT and systemic therapy. Outcomes compared between the two groups were locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. LRFS, DFS, and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Out of 414 patients, 138 and 276 were very young and young, respectively. Clinical, pathological, and treatment characteristics were balanced between the two groups except for more patients in the young group who had pN3 disease and received hormonal therapy; 41 (15%) versus seven (5%) and 171 (62%) versus 62 (45%) in the very young group, respectively. Median follow-up was 84 months (range 12-363 months). LR was seen in 16 (11.6%) and 25 (9%) patients in the very young and young groups, respectively (p = 0.28). The hazard ratios for LR, disease recurrence, and death in the very young group relative to the young group were 1.11 (p = 0.25), 1.0 (p = 1.0), and 1.05 (p = 0.79), respectively. Estimated 10-year LRFS, DFS and OS were 80% versus 86%, 63% versus 61%, and 66% versus 64% in the very young and young groups, respectively. Lymphedema, cardiac toxicity, and second malignancy developed in seven (5%) versus 23 (8%), one (1%) versus three (1%), and seven (5%) versus 18 (7%) patients in the very young and young groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In very young and young patients with BC, there was no significant difference in LRR, LRFS, DFS, or OS. Toxicities were also comparable between the two groups.

Therapeutic benefit of radiotherapy after surgery in patients with T1–T2 breast tumour

Purpose: To look for the therapeutic benefit of radiotherapy after surgery in patients with T1–T2 breast tumour.

Methodology: From 1990 to 2000, 915 patients with T1–T2 breast tumour who underwent mastectomy or conservative breast surgery (CBS) with or without radiotherapy were analysed retrospectively for age, disease stage, radiation therapy technique, dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy and other clinical and/or pathologic characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine significant prognostic factors affecting LRRFS and OS.

Results: At a median follow up of 74 months, LRR rate was 5.3% and distant metastases rate was 19%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS at 10 year was 72% and 76%, respectively. LRR in patients with CBS followed with radiation was 3% as compared to 33% without radiation. LRR in patients with post-mastectomy radiation was 3% as compared to 19% without radiation. In patients with N0 nodes, LRR was 4% with radiation and 20% without radiation. Worst case was in patients with CBS-N0 who were not given radiation. LRR in such patients was 32% as compared to 5% in those who were given radiation post-CBS. In patients with mastectomy with N0 status, LRR was 3% with radiation as compared to 18% with out radiation. On univariate analysis factors affecting LRRFS were type of surgery, nodal involvement, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Factors affecting OS were nodal involvement, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), extracapsular extension (ECE), chemotherapy and radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis factors affecting LRRFS were type of surgery, nodal involvement, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Factors affecting OS were nodal involvement, LVI, DCIS, ECE, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Conclusion: Radiation use offered a therapeutic advantage for all patients with T1–T2 breast cancer.

Clinicopathological features of primary central nervous system diffuse large B cell lymphoma: Experience from a Tertiary Center in North India

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNS-DLBCL) is a rare extra-nodal Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There is relative paucity of literature on PCNSL from Indian subcontinent. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of PCNSL and categorize them into germinal center B cell (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes to assess their prognostic significance in Indian context.

METHODS

All patients with histopathologically diagnosed PCNSLs at our center over a period of 6 years were recruited and classified into GCB and non-GCB using Han's algorithm (immunohistochemistry for CD10, BCL6 and MUM1). In situ hybridization (ISH) for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded RNA was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six cases of PCNS-DLBCL were included with median age of 55 years. Majority of them were supratentorial in location (n = 62). All patients were immunocompetent. On immunohistochemical assessment, 69 (80.2%) were of NGCB subtype, 10 (11.6%) were of GCB subtype, and 7 (8.1%) were unclassified. Overall, MUM1, BCL-6, and CD10 expressions were seen in 69 (80.2%), 28 (32.6%), and 2 cases (2.3%), respectively. Four cases (4.6%) showed C-MYC expression. The median overall survival (OS) was 675 days. None of the factors (age, sex, location, immunomarkers, and GCB vs. NGCB phenotype) showed correlation with OS; however, BCL6 positive cases showed slight better OS (P > 0.05). All cases were negative for EBV-LMP1 on ISH.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the CNS DLBCL belongs to non-GCB phenotype and uniformly carry poor prognosis, irrespective of their phenotype. Individual markers, such as BCL-6, MUM1, or CD10, are unable to predict outcome in PCNS-DLBCL.

Fungating scrotal mass: A rare clinical presentation of testicular tumor

A 20-year-old male patient presented with fungating scrotal mass. Investigations revealed yolk sac tumor with lung metastasis. The patient was treated with systemic chemotherapy. There was complete disappearance of the scrotal mass as well as metastatic disease from the lung. Fungating scrotal mass is a rare presentation of testicular tumor. This rare presentation is reported here. This is second such case in the English literature.

Breast cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2-weeks with 2D technique: 5-year clinical outcomes of a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

To report clinical outcomes and late toxicities of a 2-week hypofractionated post-operative loco-regional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and registered with gov, no. NCT02460744. Between June 2013 and October 2014, 50 patients with breast cancer, post mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) were included in this study, of whom 10 had BCS. Patients were planned on a 2-dimentional (2D) simulator with 2 tangential fields and an incident supraclavicular field. Radiotherapy dose was 34 Gy/10#/2 weeks and a sequential boost of 10 Gy/5#/1 wk in BCS patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute skin toxicities previously reported. Here, we report the secondary end points of late toxicities, cosmesis, local recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Late skin toxicities were recorded according to the Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring criteria. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/RTOG breast cosmesis and the Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scales for the breast and chest wall, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS and OS were calculated, and 5-year DFS and OS rates (with approximate 95% CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Late grade ≥ 2 chest wall induration, hypopigmentation and subcutaneous fibrosis were seen in 3 (6%), 3 (6%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. Chest wall cosmesis was excellent/good in 34 (72%) and fair/bad in 13 (28%) patients. In BCS patients, grade 2 skin induration, subcutaneous fibrosis and edema was observed in 1 patient (11%) each. Cosmesis was excellent/good in 7 (78%) and fair/bad in 2 (22%) patients. Late grade ≥ 2 arm edema, pain and shoulder stiffness were reported by 1 (2%), 2 (4%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. No local recurrences were observed. Five patients developed distant metastases (10%). Seven patients died (14%). The 5-year DFS and OS rate was 90% (95% CI: 77-96%) and 88% (95% CI: 75-94%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in 2 weeks in patients with breast cancer was associated with minimal late toxicity, good cosmetic outcome and excellent local control. This trial may be of relevance for developing countries where resources are limited.

Combined modality treatment: Outcome in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) can be treated with combined modality treatment (CMT) to limit long-term toxicities in the early favorable stage. Early unfavorable and advanced stage HL is mainly treated with chemotherapy followed by radiation to the bulky site. This study examines the impact of CMT in early as well as advanced stage HL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2011, 125 patients with Stage I to IV HL were analyzed. Median age of the patients was 25 years (range 12-68 years). CMT, chemotherapy, and radiation alone were given to 51, 64, and 10 patients, respectively. Chemotherapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) was given to 100 patients, 6 patients received ABVD-like regimen, and 9 patients received cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone regimen. Radiotherapy (RT) was given to 61 (49%) patients, involved field RT to 55 (90%), and extended-field RT to 6 (10%) patients, respectively. Median radiation dose was 30 Gy (18-40 Gy).

RESULTS

All 25 patients with early-stage achieved complete response (CR) with CMT. At a median follow-up of 70 months (range 12-230 months), relapse was seen in two patients (1 local and 1 distant). Of 26 patients with advanced stage, 25 achieved a CR and 1 had stable disease with CMT. Relapse occurred in one patient (distant). In patients with early-stage treated with chemotherapy only ( n = 30, 24%), 9 patients had relapse (4 local and 5 distant) while in those with RT only ( n = 10, 8%), 4 developed distant relapse. In patients with advanced stage treated with chemotherapy only ( n = 34, 27%), 8 relapsed (5 local and distant, 3 distant only). Patients with relapse were salvaged with CMT ( n = 6), chemotherapy ( n = 15), or RT ( n = 3). Two patients have died. Five years' disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with early favorable stage, early unfavorable stage, and advanced stage was 91%, 82%, and 73%, respectively ( P = 0.026). DFS was significantly better with CMT than chemotherapy or radiation alone. Five years' overall survival (OS) was 93%, 92%, and 84%, respectively ( P = 0.139). Second malignancy occurred in 3 (2.4%) patients; carcinoma of the tongue, pseudomyxoma peritonei, and non-HL each, respectively. None of these patients had received prior radiation.

CONCLUSION

CMT improved DFS in patients with HL. OS was similar in all patients irrespective of treatment combinations. The incidence of second malignancy was 2.4%.

Workflow management in radiation oncology: the impact on a high volume department

Objective:

Integration of treatment planning and delivery is paramount for efficient functioning of radiotherapy departments. Workflow management software is a tool available for effective resource management in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of workflow-management on work-efficiency and organisational ergonomics in a high volume department.

Methods:

Before implementing the workflow management software (Aria v 11.0™), paper documentation was the predominant mode of communication between physicians and physicists in our department. Case records of patients treated with conformal radiation in the two-month period before and after implementation of workflow management were retrospectively evaluated. Proportion of cases for which treatment was started on the day of appointment was taken as a surrogate for work-efficiency.

Results:

Of the 343 cases analysed, 190 were treated before implementation of workflow-management, while 153 were treated after. Workflow management has improved overall efficiency from 67%–79%.

Conclusion:

Implementation of workflow management resulted in significant improvement in efficiency and organisational ergonomics.