Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099

PURPOSE

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) coordinated an Intergroup study with the participation of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). This randomized phase III trial compared chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiotherapy was administered in both arms: 1.8- to 2.0-Gy/d fractions Monday to Friday for 35 to 39 fractions for a total dose of 70 Gy. The investigational arm received chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 during radiotherapy; postradiotherapy, chemotherapy with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 4 was administered every 4 weeks for three courses. Patients were stratified by tumor stage, nodal stage, performance status, and histology.

RESULTS

Of 193 patients registered, 147 (69 radiotherapy and 78 chemoradiotherapy) were eligible for primary analysis for survival and toxicity. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15 months for eligible patients on the radiotherapy arm and was not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group. The 3-year PFS rate was 24% versus 69%, respectively (P < .001). The median survival time was 34 months for the radiotherapy group and not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group, and the 3-year survival rate was 47% versus 78%, respectively (P = .005). One hundred eighty-five patients were included in a secondary analysis for survival. The 3-year survival rate for patients randomized to radiotherapy was 46%, and for the chemoradiotherapy group was 76% (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancers with respect to PFS and overall survival.

A 3'-UTR KRAS-variant is associated with cisplatin resistance in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A germline mutation in the 3'-untranslated region of KRAS (rs61764370, KRAS-variant: TG/GG) has previously been associated with altered patient outcome and drug resistance/sensitivity in various cancers. We examined the prognostic and predictive significance of this variant in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 103 HNSCCs collected from three completed clinical trials. KRAS-variant genotyping was conducted for these samples and 8 HNSCC cell lines. p16 expression was determined in a subset of 26 oropharynx tumors by immunohistochemistry. Microarray analysis was also utilized to elucidate differentially expressed genes between KRAS-variant and non-variant tumors. Drug sensitivity in cell lines was evaluated to confirm clinical findings.

RESULTS

KRAS-variant status was determined in 95/103 (92%) of the HNSCC tumor samples and the allelic frequency of TG/GG was 32% (30/95). Three of the HNSCC cell lines (3/8) studied had the KRAS-variant. No association between KRAS-variant status and p16 expression was observed in the oropharynx subset (Fisher's exact test, P = 1.0). With respect to patient outcome, patients with the KRAS-variant had poor progression-free survival when treated with cisplatin (log-rank P = 0.002). Conversely, KRAS-variant patients appeared to experience some improvement in disease control when cetuximab was added to their platinum-based regimen (log-rank P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The TG/GG rs61764370 KRAS-variant is a potential predictive biomarker for poor platinum response in R/M HNSCC patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT00503997, NCT00425750, NCT00003809.

Induction cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin for stage III/IV head and neck squamous cancer: a phase II ECOG-ACRIN trial (E2303)

BACKGROUND

E2303 evaluated cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin used as induction therapy and concomitant with radiation therapy in patients with stage III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) determining pathologic complete response (CR), event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable stage III/IV HNSCC underwent induction therapy with planned primary site restaging biopsies (at week 8 in clinical complete responders and at week 14 if disease persisted). Chemoradiation (CRT) began week 9. If week 14 biopsy was negative, patients completed CRT (68-72 Gy); otherwise, resection was carried out. p16 protein expression status was correlated with response/survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were enrolled; 63 were eligible. Forty-four (70%) were free of surgery to the primary site, progression, and death 1-year post-treatment. Following induction, 41 (23 CR) underwent week 8 primary site biopsy and 24 (59%) had no tumor (pathologic CR). Week 14 biopsy during chemoradiation (50 Gy) in 34 (15 previously positive biopsy; 19 no prior biopsy) was negative in 33. Thus 90% of eligible patients completed CRT. Overall survival and EFS were 78% and 55% at 3 years, respectively. Disease progression in 23 patients (37%) was local only in 10 (16%), regional in 5 (8%), local and regional in 2 (3%), and distant in 5 patients (8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Toxicity was primarily hematologic or radiation-related. p16 AQUA score was not associated with response/survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by the same drug CRT is safe and induces high primary site response and promising survival.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT 00089297.

Prognostic significance of human papillomavirus in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: an analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article was to study the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) with clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Archival baseline tumor specimens were obtained from patients treated on two clinical trials in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN: E1395, a phase III trial of cisplatin and paclitaxel versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, and E3301, a phase II trial of irinotecan and docetaxel. HPV DNA was detected by in situ hybridization (ISH) with a wide-spectrum probe. p16 status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinical outcomes of interest were objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 64 patients for HPV ISH and 65 for p16. Eleven tumors (17%) were HPV+, 12 (18%) were p16+, whereas 52 (80%) were both HPV- and p16-. The objective response rate was 55% for HPV-positive versus 19% for HPV-negative (P = 0.022), and 50% for p16-positive versus 19% for p16-negative (P = 0.057). The median survival was 12.9 versus 6.7 months for HPV-positive versus HPV-negative patients (P = 0.014), and 11.9 versus 6.7 months for p16-positive versus p16-negative patients (P = 0.027). After adjusting for other covariates, hazard ratio for OS was 2.69 (P = 0.048) and 2.17 (P = 0.10), favoring HPV-positive and p16-positive patients, respectively. The other unfavorable risk factor for OS was loss of ≥5% weight in previous 6 months (P = 0.0021 and 0.023 for HPV and p16 models, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HPV is a favorable prognostic factor in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN that should be considered in the design of clinical trials in this setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

NCT01487733 Clinicaltrials.gov.

Genetic variation in radiation and platinum pathways predicts severe acute radiation toxicity in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with cisplatin-based preoperative radiochemotherapy: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Germline genetic variations may partly explain the clinical observation that normal tissue tolerance to radiochemotherapy varies by individual. Our objective was to evaluate the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in radiation/platinum pathways and serious treatment-related toxicity in subjects with esophageal adenocarcinoma who received cisplatin-based preoperative radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

In a multicenter clinical trial (E1201), 81 eligible treatment-naïve subjects with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma received cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy, with planned subsequent surgical resection. Toxicity endpoints were defined as grade ≥3 radiation-related or myelosuppressive events probably or definitely related to therapy, occurring during or up to 6 weeks following the completion of radiochemotherapy. SNPs were analyzed in 60 subjects in pathways related to nucleotide/base excision- or double stranded break repair, or platinum influx, efflux, or detoxification.

RESULTS

Grade ≥3 radiation-related toxicity (mostly dysphagia) and myelosuppression occurred in 18 and 33% of subjects, respectively. The variant alleles of the XRCC2 5' flanking SNP (detected in 28% of subjects) and of GST-Pi Ile-105-Val (detected in 65% of subjects) were each associated with higher odds of serious radiation-related toxicity compared to the major allele homozygote (47% vs. 9%, and 31% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.005). No SNP was associated with myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel finding in a well-characterized cohort with robust endpoint data supports further investigation of XRCC2 and GST-Pi as potential predictors of radiation toxicity.

Update on role of chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer

Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is most commonly a tobacco-related disease, affecting nearly 600,000 people worldwide each year. For decades, HNSCC has been treated successfully with multimodality treatments including, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, though the 'perfect' treatment paradigm remains elusive. This review will discuss a number of clinical trials, comparing various combinations of chemotherapy and the settings in which they are most successful. Promising research and recent data on the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with new biological agents indicate chemotherapy plays a critical role in treatment of HNSCC and will only continue to improve.

Outcome prediction based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair paths in patients (pts) with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with preoperative (preop) cisplatin (C)-based chemoradiation (CRT): Results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)

4530

Background: EAC has eluded cure even with platin-based CRT. Stratifying pts by likelihood of success is one approach to improving outcomes. We assessed whether SNPs in DNA repair paths are associated with complete pathologic response (pCR) in EAC pts who received C-based CRT followed by surgery. Methods: Patients and specimens: Pretreatment biopsy or post-CRT resection samples were obtained from pts (EAC, stage II-IVa) treated on a randomized phase II trial, E1201 (n=86), of preop CRT (RT to 45 Gy). Arm A: Preop C 30 mg/m2 + irinotecan (I) 50 mg/m2 days (d) 1, 8, 22, 29 with RT. Post-op C 30 mg/m2 + I 65 mg/m2 d 1, 8 q21 days x 3. Arm B: Preop C 30 mg/m2 + paclitaxel (P) 50 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 with RT. Post-op C 75 mg/m2 + P 175 mg/m2 d 1 q21 days x 3. Clinical outcome - pCR: (A) 14% [95% CI 5.5%, 28.5%]; (B) 16% [95% CI 6.7%, 30.1%]. Median overall survival (OS): (A) 34.9 m (months) [90% CI 23.5, not reached]; (B) 20.9 m [90% CI 17.4, 46.7]. Experimental procedure: Normal tissue was microdissected from unstained sections of paraffin-embedded tissue. DNA was extracted (Qiagen). Genotyping was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (Sequenom) for all SNPs. Each SNP was dichotomized a priori into: (1) major homozygote vs (2) minor (heterozygote plus minor homozygote) allele groups. Data analysis was performed centrally, with lab investigators blinded to clinical data. Exact logistic regression was used to derive ORs for non-pCR, using the major homozygote as the reference (2-sided p values). Results: Germline DNA was available in 68 pts; 60 were eligible and began therapy ( Table ). Conclusions: In this homogenous, well-defined cohort, the XRCC1 Arg399Gln minor allele group was associated with lower pCR (p=0.06). Lab data on a panel of additional SNPs have been collected and are under analysis for presentation at the meeting.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Phase II trial of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests synergy between docetaxel and irinotecan, two drugs active in esophagogastric cancer. We previously demonstrated the safety of docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had unresectable/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to two, and normal bilirubin were eligible. Tumor assessment was carried out every three cycles.

RESULTS

We enrolled 29 chemotherapy-naive (CN) and 15 chemotherapy-exposed (CE) eligible patients. Principal toxic effects were diarrhea, neutropenia, and hyperglycemia. There were no toxic deaths. There was one early death, from myocardial infarction. Among 26 CN and assessable patients, there were seven (26.9%) with a partial response (PR) and one (3.8%) with a complete response (CR). There were two PRs and one CR among the patients with CE disease. Median time to progression for CN patients was 4.0 months and for CE patients 3.5 months. Median survival for CN eligible patients was 9.0 months and for CE patients 11.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel-irinotecan combination given on a weekly x 2 of 3 schedule is promising in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

A randomized phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) given daily x 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study

Ixabepilone is a tubulin-polymerizing agent with potential activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients were eligible who had incurable, measurable SCCHN and less than two prior regimens for metastatic/recurrent disease. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than or equal to one and adequate renal/hepatic/hematological function were required. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ixabepilone 6 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days every 21 days (arm A) or 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (arm B). Each arm accrued taxane-naive and -exposed strata in a two-stage design. The primary end point was response. Eighty-five eligible patients entered; there was one response in a taxane-exposed patient among 32 patients on arm A. Five of 35 taxane-naive patients on arm B had partial responses (14%). No taxane-exposed patient on arm B responded. Common grades 3 and 4 toxic effects were fatigue, neutropenia, and sensory/motor neuropathy. Median survival for arm A taxane-naive and taxane-exposed patients is 5.6 and 6.5 months; for arm B, taxane-naive and taxane-exposed patients is 7.8 and 6.5 months. Weekly ixabepilone 20 mg/m(2) is active in taxane-naive patients with SCCHN. A high incidence of motor and sensory grade 3 neuropathy resulted at this dose and schedule. Further development of ixabepilone in previously treated head and neck cancer is not warranted on the basis of these data.

A phase II study of axitinib (AG-013736 [AG]) in patients (pts) with advanced thyroid cancers

6008

Background: Elevated VEGF-A and VEGF-C have been reported in thyroid tumor tissue compared with normal thyroid. AG is a potent, small molecule inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1, 2 and 3. The efficacy and safety of AG therapy in pts with advanced thyroid cancers was examined in this single-arm, multi-center study. Methods: 60 pts with metastatic or unresectable locally-advanced thyroid cancer refractory to, or not suitable candidates for, 131iodine (131I) treatment, with measurable disease received AG at a starting dose of 5 mg orally BID. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) by RECIST criteria. A Simon 2-stage minimax design was used (a=0.1; β=0.1; null RR=5%; alternative RR=20%). Samples were collected pretreatment and q8wks to explore relationships between clinical response and plasma soluble proteins. Results: Median age was 59 yrs (26–84), 35 (58%) were male. Histological subtypes included papillary: 29 pts (48%); follicular: 15 pts (25%)-11 (18%) with Hurthle cell variant; medullary: 12 pts (20%); anaplastic: 2 pts (3%), and other/unknown: 2 pts (3%). 53 pts (88%) had prior surgery, 42 (70%) had prior 131I treatment, 27 (45%) had prior external beam radiation, and 9 (15%) had prior chemotherapy. Partial response (PR) by investigator report was achieved in 13 pts (22% CI: 12.1, 34.2), with 31- 68% maximum tumor regression and duration of response (DOR) of 1–16 months. 30 pts (50%) have stable disease with a duration range of 4–13 months and 13–67% maximum tumor regression in 28 pts. Response assessments are ongoing. The treatment duration range is 6–670 days with 38 pts currently on study. Median PFS has not been reached with a median follow up of 273 days. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (37%), proteinuria (27%), stomatitis/mucositis (25%), diarrhea (22%), hypertension (20%) and nausea (18%). AG therapy consistently decreased soluble VEGFR2 and VEGFR3, and increased VEGF in the blood, demonstrating pharmacodynamic activity against targeted VEGF receptors. Conclusions: AG has substantial anti-tumor activity in advanced thyroid cancer with demonstrated pharmacodynamic activity. A global pivotal trial testing AG in doxorubicin refractory thyroid cancer is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

Early prediction of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with 18[F]FDG-PET: A preclinical and clinical correlation

14064

Background: Predictive biomarkers for response to anti-EGFR therapy are of significant clinical importance. We hypothesized that early changes in 18[F]FDG tumor uptake predict response to anti-EGFR therapy. We investigated this in a mice model and correlated these findings with human patients undergoing anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: Mice bearing two head and neck squamous cell cancer (HnNSCC) xenografts (Hep2, Cal27) received vehicle or erlotinib for 3 weeks. 18[F]FDG uptake were imaged with small animal micro- PET at baseline and after 1 week of therapy, and reported in SUVmax. For clinical correlation, human patients with HnNSCC receiving erlotinib were identified from an ongoing clinical trial. 18[F]FDG-PET images were obtained at baseline and after 2 weeks of erlotinib monotherapy. Tumor specimens were obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the same time as PET. A panel of pharmacodynamic markers (including Ki-67 and pMAPK) were assessed . Results: Hep2 was resistant to erlotinib therapy (Tumor/Control [T/C]: 0.8) while Cal27 was sensitive (T/C: 0.2). SUVmax in the resistant Hep2 xenografts was not significantly different from the control (86% ± 70% of control) while SUVmax in the treated sensitive Cal27 xenografts showed a significant decrease than control (-2% ± 7%). Ki-67 in the treated Hep2 was not significantly different from control while that in Cal27 was <50% of control. For clinical correlation, ki-67 score was higher after 2 weeks in the patient resistant to erlotinib monotherapy by 18[F]FDG-PET (SUVmax increased by 14%, ± 11%) and was lower in the patient who was 18[F]FDG-PET sensitive (SUVmax decreased by 56%, ± 13%). pMAPK decreased in all cases and had a poor correlation with efficacy. Conclusions: Early dynamic changes in 18[F]FDG tumor uptake is predictive of response to anti-EGFR therapy and correlates with changes in ki-67 expression, both in a preclinical and a clinical scenario.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-term results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11: A phase III trial to preserve the larynx—Induction cisplatin/5-FU and radiation therapy versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy

5517

Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival.

[Table: see text]

A randomized phase II study of BMS-247550 (ixabepilone) given daily x 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

5532

Background: Ixabepilone is a novel tubulin-polymerizing agent, with potential activity in SCCHN. Methods: Patients (pts) were eligible who had incurable, measurable SCCHN. ≤ 2 prior regimens for metastatic/recurrent disease were permitted, including taxanes. ECOG PS 0 or 1, ANC ≥ 1500/ml and adequate renal/hepatic function were required. Pts were randomized to ixabepilone 6 mg/m2/d 60 minute (min) infusion x 5 days (d) q 21 d [Arm A], or 20 mg/m2 60 min infusion d1, 8, and 15 q 28 d [Arm B], with diphenhydramine premedication. Tumor assessment was q 6 weeks. Each arm accrued taxane-naive (Tax-N) and -exposed (Tax-E) patients as separate strata, in a 2-stage design. The primary endpoint was response.16 pts entered each group in the first stage. If 1 response was observed in any group, it continued to 32 pts. Results: 85 eligible pts entered. Male 69, ECOG PS (1) 58, metastatic disease 66. 15 Tax-E and 17 Tax-N eligible pts entered stage 1 of Arm A. There were no responses with this dose and schedule. 35 eligible Tax-N pts were accrued to Arm B and 5 had partial responses (14.3%, 90% CI 5.9%,28.2%), 11 stable and 9 progressive disease. 10 in this group were inevaluable (5 died before restaging, 2 were never treated).18 eligible Tax-E pts entered Arm B and none responded. On Arm A, 2/16 Tax-N pts developed grade (gd) 3/4 anemia (13%), and 4/16 (25%) developed gd 3 fatigue. Other gd 3/4 toxicities occurred in < 8% of pts on Arm A. On Arm B, 9/33 (27%) Tax-N pts experienced gd 3/4 leukopenia, 3/33 (9%) gd 3/4 anemia 7 gd 3/4 fatigue (21%), 4 gd 3 nausea (12%), 9 (27%) gd 3 sensory and 2 (6%) gd 3 motor neuropathy. 2/21 Tax-E pts on Arm B experienced gd 4 neutropenia (10%), 6 gd 3 fatigue (29%), 3 gd 3 motor (14%) and 2 gd 3 sensory neuropathy (10%). Median follow up for eligible pts is 31.5 months (mo). 75 have died. Median survival for Arm A Tax-N is 5.62 mo (CI 4.0, 10.0); for Arm A Tax-E is 6.5 mo (CI 2.7, 8.8); for Arm B Tax-N is 7.8 mo (CI 3.3, 8.9) and for Arm B Tax-E is 6.5 mo (CI 2.0, 11.3). Conclusions: Ixabepilone 20 mg/m2 d1,8,15 q 28 d is active and tolerable in taxane-naive pts with metastatic/recurrent SCCHN. A high incidence of motor and sensory gd 3 neuropathy results at this dose and schedule in patients with previous taxane exposure.

[Table: see text]

Locally advanced resectable larynx (L) or oropharynx (OP) cancer: Updated results of organ preservation trial ECOG 2399

5527

Background: Taxane-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) for head and neck cancers has proven feasible and has a favorable toxicity profile compared to concurrent cisplatin and radiation. This phase II multi-institutional trial evaluates taxane-based induction chemotherapy followed by CCR for organ preservation in resectable Stage III/IV L and OP patients. Methods: Eligibility: Resectable stage T2N+, or T3-T4N0–3M0 biopsy-proven squamous Ca, age ≥18, PS 0–2, good organ function, and no prior chemotherapy or radiation. Treatment: induction paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (C) AUC 6 for 2 cycles q21d followed by concurrent P 30 mg/m2 q7d with 70 Gy if no evidence of progression. Weekly epoetin alpha 40kU was used if Hgb ≤15 (male) or ≤14 (female). The primary endpoint is organ preservation (freedom from salvage surgery with preserved speech and swallowing). Results: 105/111 pts (69 OP, 36 larynx) were eligible. Median FU is 33 months. No grade 5 toxicities occurred. 94% received full dose RT and 91% received ≥5 cycles of concurrent paclitaxel. At one year post-treatment, 13 (12%) patients required salvage surgery at the primary site (7-L, 6-OP), and 6 pts (6%) progressed and died (3-L, 3-OP). 1 pt (1%) died without progression and 85 pts (81%) are alive without progression (25-L, 60-OP). 12 pts (10%) have developed distant mets (6-L, 6-OP). 1-yr and 2-yr PFS for all pts is 77% and 64%. 12/69 OP and 9/36 L pts have died of disease. 1-yr event-free survival (EFS = no salvage surgery, recurrence or death) is 72% (77%-OP, 64%-L), and 2-yr EFS is 57% (68%-OP, 34%-L) (p = 0.02). 1-yr OS is 93%, 2-yr OS is 74% (OP vs. L p = 0.11). Conclusions: This regimen is well tolerated and is feasible in a multi-institutional setting. EFS with this regimen is lower than expected in larynx patients. The benefit of induction chemotherapy in this setting remains unproven but does not preclude CCR delivery. Funded, in part, by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

[Table: see text]

Phase II trial of trastuzumab (T), paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C) in metastatic (M) or recurrent (R) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Response by tumor EGFR and HER2/neu status

5511

Background: EGFR expression is associated with poor prognosis and resistance of HNSCC to therapy. EGFR/Her2/neu heterodimers may potentiate receptor signaling and therapy resistance. T enhances cytotoxic effects of C and P in Her2/neu+ cell lines. Methods: A phase II trial evaluated the response rate (RR) of HNSCC pts to TPC as a function of Her2/neu and EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Secondary outcomes included toxicity, one-year progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Eligible pts had M or R HNSCC, ECOG PS 0–1, CrCl >50 ml/min, and ANC >1500. Chemotherapy regimen consisted of P (175 mg/m2) and C (75 mg/m2) IV on day 1 and T (4 mg/kg day 1, cycle 1, 2 mg/kg subsequent) IV on day 1, 8 and 15 of 21. Paraffin embedded tumor was analyzed for Her2/neu (HercepTest) and EGFR (Zymed Lab) expression by IHC and for Her2/neu amplification by FISH (−/+) at LabCorp. Two-stage Simon design had 80% power for a 15% improvement in RR over 35% and required response in ≥ 14/42 pts by ECOG response criteria. Results: 61 pts (55 R HNSCC) received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–14) of TPC. Membrane staining of ≥ 10% of cells was observed for Her2/neu in 4/58 (6.9%, 95% CI 2–17) and for EGFR in 41/57 (72%, 95% CI 58–83). Her2/neu amplification was absent in 55/55 (0%, one-sided 97.5% CI 0–6.7) tumors. A RR of 36% (95% CI 24–50) was observed in 58 evaluable pts. RR was lower in pts with ≥ 10% staining by EGFR (25% versus 62.5%, p = 0.01). Her2/neu expression had no effect on RR (p = 0.75). Toxicities included two grade 5 dehydration/hypokalemia, and grade 3–4 neutropenia, fatigue, infection, nausea, vomiting, and neuropathy were common. Median follow-up was 4.2 yrs. For all 61 pts: median TTP was 4.3 mos, PFS 19.8% (95% CI 10.6–30.9) and OS 44% (95% CI 31.6–56.2) at 1 yr. Pts with <10% EGFR membrane staining had improved median PFS (6.7 vs 3.1 mos, p = 0.003) and OS (16.1 vs 7.4 mos, p = 0.005) when compared to patients with tumors with ≥ 10% EGFR. Conclusions: T did not improve RR to PC, likely because Her2/neu gene amplification and expression was rare. Tumor EGFR status significantly affected RR, PFS, and OS to the underlying regimen of PC. Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (MG).

[Table: see text]