A phase I study of a mutant KRAS-targeted long peptide vaccine combined with ipilimumab/nivolumab in resected pancreatic cancer and MMR-proficient metastatic colorectal cancer

TPS814

Background: Novel strategies are needed to improve immune responses in “cold” tumors such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer (MMRp CRC). As a frequent oncogenic driver, mutant KRAS (mKRAS) neoantigens are attractive targets to augment anti-tumor immunity in both diseases. Recently, adoptive transfer of mKRAS G12D-specific T cells has shown durable tumor regressions in patients with metastatic CRC and PDAC (Tran et. al., 2020; Leidner et. al., 2022). Furthermore, our preclinical work has demonstrated that combining a mKRAS neoantigen vaccine with immune-modulating agents prevents progression of premalignant lesions to PDAC in mice (Keenan et. al., 2014). Based on this rationale, our study pairs a pooled synthetic long peptide (SLP) mKRAS vaccine with dual checkpoint blockade to assess safety and immunogenicity in patients with resected PDAC and chemorefractory MMRp CRC. Methods: This is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label phase I trial evaluating a pooled SLP mKRAS vaccine combined with ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo) in patients with resected PDAC (Cohort A, n = 12) and MMRp metastatic CRC (Cohort B, n = 12) The vaccine consists of poly-ICLC adjuvant admixed with SLPs corresponding to six common mKRAS subtypes: G12D, G12R, G12V, G12A, G12C, and G13D. In priming phase, the mKRAS vaccine is given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 along with ipi/nivo. In boost phase, the mKRAS vaccine is given on weeks 13, 21, 29, 37, and 45 along with nivo alone. Cohort A patients who remain disease-free can continue to receive boost vaccines in a 12-month extended treatment phase. Eligible patients must have molecular tumor testing that demonstrates one of the six KRAS mutations listed above. Cohort A patients must be disease-free following completion of adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months prior to study entry. Cohort B patients must have confirmed MMRp status, exposure to ≥ 2 prior lines of standard chemotherapy, and measurable disease amenable to biopsies at baseline and week 7. The co-primary endpoints of this study are safety and T cell response. Adverse events will be graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0. T cell response will be determined by the maximal percent change in IFNγ-producing mKRAS-specific T cell density within 16 weeks post-vaccination compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints include disease control and objective response rates at 16 weeks per RECIST v1.1/iRECIST (Cohort B only) as well as disease-free/progression-free and overall survival. Correlative studies will examine treatment-associated changes in T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity by next-generation TCR sequencing of peripheral blood and tumor specimens. Patient accrual began in May 2020 and is completed for Cohort A. Enrollment is currently ongoing for Cohort B. Study drug support provided by Bristol Myers Squibb. Clinical trial information: NCT04117087 .

Nivolumab and a CCR2/CCR5 dual antagonist (BMS-813160) with or without GVAX for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: Results of phase I study

730

Background: Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but involvement of adjacent vital structures in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) precludes upfront resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation allows some LAPC patients to undergo resection but outcomes remain dismal. In this trial, we investigate the benefit of combining chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy to improve outcomes in LAPC by enhancing antitumor immunity. The use of GVAX, Nivolumab, and BMS-813160 is hypothesized to promote immune responses through enhanced effector T cell infiltration and activation by GVAX and nivolumab while inhibiting immunosuppressive tumor associated macrophages via CCR2/5 inhibition with BMS-813160. Testing this combination in LAPC will facilitate assessment of the changes this combination produces in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: This open-label, single center two-arm phase I/II trial uses neoadjuvant/adjuvant nivolumab and BMS-813160 +/- GVAX following 8 to 16 doses of FOLFIRINOX and SBRT in patients with newly diagnosed LAPC. The primary endpoint of the phase I portion is safety of nivolumab, BMS-813160, and GVAX in patients with LAPC following chemotherapy and SBRT. The phase II portion randomizes patients 1:1 to nivolumab and BMS-813160 +/- GVAX with primary endpoint of immune response defined as > 80% increase in CD8+CD137+ cell infiltration. For the phase I portion a 3+3 dose escalation was used: nivolumab 480mg IV and GVAX 5x108 cells intradermal were administered at a fixed dose every 4 weeks. BMS-813160 was administered at a dose of 150mg and 300mg PO BID in levels 1 and 2 respectively. DLTs were evaluated during the 1st cycle of treatment and study-related adverse events (AE) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0. Results: In the phase I portion of this trial, 13 patients were enrolled. The patient characteristics of the enrolled patients were: median age (range), 67 (44, 78), Female/Male, (4/9), Race, (Asian: 2, Black: 3, White: 8), histological grade (moderately/poor/moderately poor), (10/2/1). Nine of the 13 patients proceeded to immunotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Three patients received treatment at dose level 1 and 6 patients at dose level 2. No DLTs were observed with the only grade 3 or higher AE being maculo-papular rash (n = 1). The RP2D for BMS-813160 was determined to be 300mg PO BID. Conclusions: We determined that nivolumab 480mg IV q4 weeks, GVAX 5x108 cells intradermal q4 weeks, and BMS-813160 300mg PO BID were the RP2D for the phase 2 portion of this investigation which is ongoing. This combination appears safe and neoadjuvant use does not lead to delay in surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03767582 .

A phase I study of a mutant KRAS-targeted long peptide vaccine in patients at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer

TPS758

Background: KRAS mutations are identified in the majority of premalignant lesions that precede pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Arising during tumorigenesis, mutant KRAS (mKRAS) neoantigens are less susceptible to central tolerance mechanisms and serve as ideal vaccine targets. Indeed, targeting mKRAS neoantigens with vaccines has shown promising anti-tumor activity in the preclinical setting. For instance, our group previously demonstrated that a Listeria-based vaccine targeting mKRAS G12D combined with Treg-depleting agents can prevent the progression of early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia to overt PDAC in a mouse model (Keenan et al, 2014). Building upon this work, the current study aims to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a pooled synthetic long peptide (SLP) mKRAS vaccine in patients identified as high risk for developing PDAC based on family history and germline mutation testing. Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label phase I trial evaluating a pooled SLP mKRAS vaccine in patients at high risk of developing PDAC ( n = 20). The vaccine consists of poly-ICLC adjuvant admixed with SLPs corresponding to six common mKRAS subtypes: G12D, G12R, G12V, G12A, G12C, and G13D. A four-dose series of the mKRAS vaccine is administered on weeks 1, 3, 4, and 17. Following completion of the treatment phase, all patients have the option to continue annual follow-up visits until study closure. Eligible patients must have radiographic evidence of a premalignant pancreatic lesion and fall under at least one of the following three high-risk groups: 1) ≥ 2 familial pancreatic cancer relatives, 2) germline mutation carriers with ≥ 10% lifetime PDAC risk and 3) germline mutation carriers with ~5% lifetime PDAC risk. The co-primary endpoints of this study are safety and T cell response. Safety will be assessed by the frequency and grading of adverse events per NCI CTCAE v5.0. T cell response will be determined by the maximal percent change in IFNγ-producing mKRAS-specific T cell density within 16 weeks post-vaccination compared to baseline. Correlative studies will explore vaccine-associated changes in T cell quality (e.g., memory, exhaustion, poly-functionality, and activation) using mass cytometry analysis of peripheral blood samples. Patient accrual began in April 2022 and is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05013216 .

Every child, every day, back to play: the PICUstars protocol - implementation of a nurse-led PICU liberation program

BACKGROUND

As admissions to paediatric intensive care units (PICU) rise and mortality rates decline, the focus is shifting from survival to quality of survivorship. There is paucity of internationally accepted guidelines to manage complications like over-sedation, delirium, and immobility in the paediatric setting. These have a strong adverse impact on PICU recovery including healthcare costs and long-term functional disability. The A2F bundle (ABCDEF), or ICU Liberation, was developed to operationalise the multiple evidence-based guidelines addressing ICU-related complications and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and health-care related costs in adult studies. However, there is little data on the effect of ICU Liberation bundle implementation in PICU.

METHODS

PICU-STARS will be a single centre before-and-after after trial and implementation study. It is designed to evaluate if the multidimensional, nurse-led ICU Liberation model of care can be applied to the PICU and if it is successful in minimising PICU-related problems in a mixed quaternary PICU. In a prospective baseline measurement, the present practises of care in the PICU will be assessed in order to inform the adaptation and implementation of the PICU Liberation bundle. To assess feasibility, implementation outcomes, and intervention effectiveness, the implementation team will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CIFR) and process assessment (mixed methods). The implementation process will be evaluated over time, with focus groups, interviews, questionnaires, and observations used to provide formative feedback. Over time, the barriers and enablers for successful implementation will be analysed, with recommendations based on "lessons learned." All outcomes will be reported using standard descriptive statistics and analytical techniques, with appropriate allowance for patient differentials in severity and relevant characteristics.

DISCUSSION

The results will inform the fine-tune of the Liberation bundle adaptation and implementation process. The expected primary output is a detailed adaptation and implementation guideline, including clinical resources (and investment) required, to adopt PICU-STARS in other children's hospitals.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STATEMENT

The authors thank the PICU education and Liberation Implementation team, and our patients and families for their inspiration and valuable comments on protocol drafts. Results will be made available to critical care survivors, their caregivers, relevant societies, and other researchers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN, ACTRN382863 . Registered 19/10/2021 - Retrospectively registered.

STUDY STATUS

recruiting.

A randomized, phase II trial of adjuvant immunotherapy with durable TKI-free survival in patients with chronic phase CML

PURPOSE

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients can achieve undetectable minimal residual disease (UMRD) and discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Cellular immunity plays an important role in CML disease control. We conducted a randomized, non-blinded phase II trial of adjuvant immunotherapy with TKIs to facilitate TKI discontinuation.

METHODS

TKI-treated patients with CP-CML were randomized to receive the K562/GM-CSF vaccine (vaccine) OR Interferon-α + Sargramostim (IFN). If UMRD was achieved, then all treatment was stopped. Patients who did not achieve UMRD within one year, had a molecular relapse, or discontinued therapy for toxicity could crossover.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were randomized to IFN (n = 18) or vaccine (n = 16), and 21 patients crossed over (IFN⟶vaccine: n = 9, vaccine⟶IFN, n = 12). TKIs at enrollment included imatinib (n = 31), nilotinib (n = 2), and dasatinib (n = 1). No patients discontinued vaccine due to side effects, while 33 % of IFN-treated patients discontinued treatment. More patients randomized to IFN (47.4 %, 95 % CI: 16.7-66.7 %) versus vaccine (25.0 %, 95 % CI: 0.5-43.5 %) achieved UMRD within one year. Seven patients randomized to IFN discontinued treatment with 28.6 % (95 % CI: 8.9-92.2 %) sustaining treatment-free remission (TFR) at 1 year, while three patients randomized to vaccine discontinued treatment with none sustaining TFR. Including crossover, there was a cumulative discontinuation success rate of 36.4 % (95 % CI: 16.6 %-79.5 %) after adjuvant IFN. Patients who sustained TFR received a median of 29 months of imatinib prior to discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant IFN led to durable TFRs with limited prior TKI exposure with comparable success to prior discontinuation trials, but many patients stopped IFN early.

An Allogeneic Multiple Myeloma GM-CSF-Secreting Vaccine with Lenalidomide Induces Long-term Immunity and Durable Clinical Responses in Patients in Near Complete Remission

PURPOSE

This proof-of-principle clinical trial evaluated whether an allogeneic multiple myeloma GM-CSF-secreting vaccine (MM-GVAX) in combination with lenalidomide could deepen the clinical response in patients with multiple myeloma in sustained near complete remission (nCR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients on lenalidomide were treated with MM-GVAX and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV; Prevnar) at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Eight patients (53.3%) achieved a true CR. With a median follow-up of 5 years, the median progression-free survival had not been reached, and the median overall survival was 7.8 years from enrollment. MM-GVAX induced clonal T-cell expansion and measurable cytokine responses that persisted up to 7 years in all patients. At baseline, a higher minimal residual disease was predictive of early relapse. After vaccination, a lack of both CD27^-DNAM1^-CD8⁺ T cells and antigen-presenting cells was associated with disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

MM-GVAX, along with lenalidomide, effectively primed durable immunity and resulted in long-term disease control, as suggested by the reappearance of a detectable, fluctuating M-spike without meeting the criteria for clinical relapse. For patients in a nCR, MM-GVAX administration was safe and resulted in prolonged clinical responses.

Analysis of misses in imaging of head and neck pathology by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary academic medical centre

AIM

To analyse errors in head and neck (H&N) pathology made by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary-care centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A neuroradiology quality assurance (QA) database of radiological errors was searched for attending physician errors in H&N pathology from 2014-2020. Data were limited to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. Data were collected on missed pathologies and study types. Misses were grouped into three categories: central neck (thyroid gland, aerodigestive tract), lateral neck (salivary glands, lymph nodes, soft tissues), and face/orbits (orbits, sinuses, masticator space).

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 283,248 CT and MRI neuroradiology examinations were interpreted (all indications). Seventy-four H&N misses were identified comprising 85.1% perceptual and 14.9% interpretive errors. The distribution of errors was face/orbits (37.8%), central neck (36.5%), and lateral neck (25.7%). Clinically significant errors were found most commonly in the aerodigestive tract (21%), orbits (17.7%), masticator space, and parotid glands (14.5% each). The majority (67.6%) of the misses were detected on examinations that were not performed for a primary H&N indication; MRI brain was the most common examination (27%). Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses accounted for 48.6% of all misses.

CONCLUSION

The majority of H&N misses were perceptual and were detected on examinations not performed for a H&N indication. Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses represented half of all misses.

Developing Workshops to Enhance Hope Among Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Oncologists: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

Hope is a modifiable entity that can be augmented. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a short intervention to increase hopefulness in patients with advanced breast cancer and oncologists.

METHODS

We enrolled eligible participants to two cohorts: one for patients with metastatic breast cancer and one for medical, radiation, or surgical oncologists. The intervention, a half-day hope enhancement workshop, included groups of 10-15 participants within each cohort. Participants in both cohorts completed preworkshop, postworkshop, and 3-month evaluations, which included the Adult Hope Scale (AHS), Herth Hope Index (HHI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) measures in patients, and the AHS, HHI, and a burnout self-assessment tool in physicians.

RESULTS

We consented 13 patients and 26 oncologists for participation in the workshop and 76.9% (n = 10) of consented patients and 100% (n = 26) of consented physicians participated. Postworkshop, all participants planned to incorporate what they learned into their daily lives. In patients, AHS scores increased from preworkshop to postworkshop, and the mean change of 5.90 was significant (range 0-15, SD: 4.7, t = 3.99, P = .0032). HHI scores also increased, although the mean change was not significant. AHS and HHI scores did not significantly change in oncologists from preworkshop to postworkshop. At 3 months, less than half of the participants responded to the evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We found that conducting a hope-enhancement workshop for patients with metastatic breast cancer and oncologists was feasible, generally acceptable to both populations, and associated with increased hopefulness in patients. Next steps should focus on confirming this effect in a randomized study and maintaining this effect in the postworkshop interval.

Randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo: results of the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the effectiveness of vitiligo treatments is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB, compared with TCS alone, for localized vitiligo.

METHODS

A pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (9-month treatment, 12-month follow-up). Adults and children, recruited from secondary care and the community, aged ≥ 5 years and with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin, were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive TCS (mometasone furoate 0·1% ointment + dummy NB-UVB), NB-UVB (NB-UVB + placebo TCS) or a combination (TCS + NB-UVB). TCS was applied once daily on alternating weeks; NB-UVB was administered on alternate days in escalating doses, adjusted for erythema. The primary outcome was treatment success at 9 months at a target patch assessed using the participant-reported Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, with multiple imputation for missing data. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015.

RESULTS

In total 517 participants were randomized to TCS (n = 173), NB-UVB (n = 169) and combination (n = 175). Primary outcome data were available for 370 (72%) participants. The proportions with target patch treatment success were 17% (TCS), 22% (NB-UVB) and 27% (combination). Combination treatment was superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 10·9% (95% confidence interval 1·0%-20·9%; P = 0·032; number needed to treat = 10). NB-UVB alone was not superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 5·2% (95% CI - 4·4% to 14·9%; P = 0·29; number needed to treat = 19). Participants using interventions with ≥ 75% expected adherence were more likely to achieve treatment success, but the effects were lost once treatment stopped. Localized grade 3 or 4 erythema was reported in 62 (12%) participants (including three with dummy light). Skin thinning was reported in 13 (2·5%) participants (including one with placebo ointment).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment with home-based handheld NB-UVB plus TCS is likely to be superior to TCS alone for treatment of localized vitiligo. Combination treatment was relatively safe and well tolerated but was successful in only around one-quarter of participants.

An economic evaluation of the randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo (the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial)

BACKGROUND

Economic evidence for vitiligo treatments is absent.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the cost-effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB compared with TCS alone for localized vitiligo.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial with 9 months' treatment. In total 517 adults and children (aged ≥ 5 years) with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin were recruited from secondary care and the community and were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive TCS, NB-UVB or both. Cost per successful treatment (measured on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale) was estimated. Secondary cost-utility analyses measured quality-adjusted life-years using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels for those aged ≥ 11 years and the Child Health Utility 9D for those aged 5 to < 18 years. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD cost per participant was £775 ± 83·7 for NB-UVB, £813 ± 111.4 for combination treatment and £600 ± 96·2 for TCS. In analyses adjusted for age and target patch location, the incremental difference in cost for combination treatment compared with TCS was £211 (95% confidence interval 188-235), corresponding to a risk difference of 10·9% (number needed to treat = 9). The incremental cost was £1932 per successful treatment. The incremental difference in cost for NB-UVB compared with TCS was £173 (95% confidence interval 151-196), with a risk difference of 5·2% (number needed to treat = 19). The incremental cost was £3336 per successful treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment, compared with TCS alone, has a lower incremental cost per additional successful treatment than NB-UVB only. Combination treatment would be considered cost-effective if decision makers are willing to pay £1932 per additional treatment success.

Abstract CT164: A Phase II clinical trial of GVAX pancreas vaccine (with Cyclophosphamide) in combination with Nivolumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) followed by definitive resection for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC)

Background: A strong rationale exists for the use of preoperative therapy in BR-PDAC, because upfront surgery in these patients results in a high probability of incomplete resection. Recently, the Alliance A021101 trial, which utilized neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation, demonstrated the safety and clinical activity of neoadjuvant therapy in BR-PDAC. The present clinical trial will evaluate the safety and clinical activity of neoadjuvant Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in combination with neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide (Cy)/GVAX pancreas vaccine/nivolumab immunotherapy after completion of standard chemotherapy in patients with BR- PDAC. GVAX is an allogeneic, whole-cell, GM-CSF-secreting vaccine that induces T-cell immunity against tumor-associated antigens. GVAX has previously been studied in combination with low-dose Cy to inhibit regulatory T cells. In prior studies, neoadjuvant Cy/GVAX induced high levels of PD-L1 expression and the formation of novel vaccine-induced, immunologically active, tertiary lymphoid aggregates. Methods: In this multi-center, open label, phase II clinical trial, patients with BR-PDAC will receive a total of four 28-day cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Subsequently they will undergo EUS-guided fiducial placement along with SBRT simulation and core biopsy. Within 2-6 weeks after chemotherapy, patients will receive their first dose of combination immunotherapy, consisting of Cy 200 mg/m2 IV and nivolumab 240mg IV on day 1 followed by 5 x 108 GVAX vaccine cells, administered as six intradermal injections, on day 2. Approximately three weeks later, patients will receive their second dose of combined immunotherapy on the same day as initiation of SBRT (6.6 Gy x 5 days). Following completion of immunotherapy and SBRT, patients will undergo repeat imaging, surgical re-evaluation and if resectable, proceed to definitive surgical resection. This study will recruit 50 patients to achieve 45 evaluable patients receiving immunotherapy. The primary endpoint is pCR rate. Secondary endpoints include: rate of R0 resections, ORR, OS, distant metastasis free survival, adverse events (graded by NCI CTCAE). Additionally, exploratory objectives include evaluating: 1. intratumoral immune infiltrates in pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens utilizing immunohistochemistry and transcriptional analysis, 2. circulating biomarkers including plasma tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells. Key inclusion criteria for this study include: having BR- PDAC, no more than 1 month or 1 cycle (28 days) of systemic therapy for PDAC, and ECOG performance status of ≤ 1. This clinical trial is open, actively recruiting and is supported by BMS and the Skip Viragh Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT03161379.

Citation Format: Arsen Osipov, Elizabeth Sugar, Anna Ferguson, Jennifer Durham, Christina Rodriguez, Rose Parkinson, Laura Sena, Lei Zheng, Christopher Wolfgang, Richard Burkhart, Jin He, Matthew Weiss, Amol Narang, Daniel Laheru, Nilofer Azad, Elizabeth Jaffee, Colin Weekes, Mark Yarchoan. A Phase II clinical trial of GVAX pancreas vaccine (with Cyclophosphamide) in combination with Nivolumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) followed by definitive resection for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT164.

Abstract CT207: Feasibility of neoadjuvant cabozantinib plus nivolumab followed by definitive resection for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Phase Ib trial (NCT03299946)

Long-term outcomes for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are poor. Even if clear margins are obtained at the time of surgical resection, most patients with large tumors (&gt;5 cm) relapse due to micrometastatic disease. No therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in the perioperative setting, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies for resectable HCC. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant therapy resulting in downstaging and elimination of micrometastasis may increase the probability of successful surgical resection.

This ongoing open label, single arm Phase Ib trial (NCT03299946) aims to assess the feasibility of neoadjuvant cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients with locally advanced HCC. Targets of cabozantinib include MET and VEGFR. Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1. This study will also allow us to test the hypothesis that cabozantinib primes the tumor microenvironment for anti-PD1 therapy and to study mechanisms of response and resistance to combination therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first neoadjuvant clinical trial of an immune checkpoint inhibitor and the first study of neoadjuvant combination therapy in HCC.

15 patients aged ≥ 18 with potentially resectable HCC that is at high risk of recurrence, ECOG ≤ 1, normal organ and marrow function, and adequate future liver remnant will be enrolled in the study. After 2 weeks of 40 mg daily cabozantinib monotherapy lead-in, patients will receive concurrent 240 mg nivolumab infusions once every 2 weeks for 4 doses. After 8 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy and restaging, patients eligible for resection will proceed to definitive surgical resection ≥ 28 days after the last dose of cabozantinib. Primary outcomes are feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant cabozantinib plus nivolumab. Secondary outcomes are percentage of patients obtaining an R0 resection, pathologic complete response and major pathologic response rates, objective response rate, median overall survival, and median disease free survival. Tumor biopsies from patients at baseline and after 2 weeks of cabozantinib lead-in as well as tumor tissue collected from surgical resection samples will be used to determine the effect of cabozantinib monotherapy and combination therapy with nivolumab on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune activation and suppression pathways, and cytokine/chemokine signaling.

Citation Format: Aleksandra Popovic, Elizabeth Sugar, Anna Ferguson, Bradley Wilt, Jennifer N. Durham, Ihab R. Kamel, Amy Kim, Benjamin Philosophe, Robert A. Anders, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Daniel Laheru, Matthew J. Weiss, Mark Yarchoan. Feasibility of neoadjuvant cabozantinib plus nivolumab followed by definitive resection for patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Phase Ib trial (NCT03299946) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT207.

Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our aim was to use 2D convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and traumatic contusion injury from axial T2-weighted MR imaging in a cohort of patients with acute spinal cord injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients who underwent 3T MR imaging within 24 hours of spinal cord injury were included. We developed an image-analysis pipeline integrating 2D convolutional neural networks for whole spinal cord and intramedullary spinal cord lesion segmentation. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare test segmentation results between our spinal cord injury convolutional neural network (Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation) and current state-of-the-art methods. Volumes of segmented lesions were then used in a linear regression analysis to determine associations with motor scores.

RESULTS

Compared with manual labeling, the average test set Dice coefficient for the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation model was 0.93 for spinal cord segmentation versus 0.80 for PropSeg and 0.90 for DeepSeg (both components of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). Linear mixed modeling showed a significant difference between Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .05). Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation showed significantly better adaptability to damaged areas compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .02). The contusion injury volumes based on automated segmentation were significantly associated with motor scores at admission (P = .002) and discharge (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation of the spinal cord compares favorably with available segmentation tools in a population with acute spinal cord injury. Volumes of injury derived from automated lesion segmentation with Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation correlate with measures of motor impairment in the acute phase. Targeted convolutional neural network training in acute spinal cord injury enhances algorithm performance for this patient population and provides clinically relevant metrics of cord injury.

Open Defecation Sites, Unmet Sanitation Needs, and Potential Sanitary Risks in Atlanta, Georgia, 2017-2018

OBJECTIVES

To survey the spatial distribution and enteric pathogen profile of discarded human feces in the city of Atlanta, Georgia.

METHODS

After defining priority search areas in central Atlanta, we conducted 5 searches of open defecation sites totaling 15 hours during the period from October 2017 to January 2018. We collected fresh stools for analysis via multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to identify presence of 15 common parasitic, bacterial, and viral enteric pathogens.

RESULTS

We identified and mapped 39 open defecation sites containing 118 presumptive human stools; 23% of the 26 collected fresh stools tested positive for 1 or more pathogens. An estimated 12% of stools were positive for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, 7.7% for Giardia spp., 3.8% for norovirus, and 3.8% for Salmonella spp. The majority (92%) of identified open defecation sites were within 400 meters of a shelter or soup kitchen.

CONCLUSIONS

Though this study was constrained by a small sample size, results suggest that open defecation in Atlanta is common and may pose risks to public health. Public Health Implications. Open defecation may pose health risks to people experiencing homelessness and the general public.

A Multi-center Phase I Trial of Ipilimumab in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes following Hypomethylating Agent Failure

Purpose: After failure of hypomethylating agents (HMA), patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have dismal survival and no approved treatment options.Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase 1b investigator-initiated trial of ipilimumab in patients with higher risk MDS who have failed HMAs. Patients received monotherapy at two dose levels (DL; 3 and 10 mg/kg) with an induction followed by a maintenance phase. Toxicities and responses were evaluated with CTCAE.4 and IWG-2006 criteria, respectively. We also performed immunologic assays and T-cell receptor sequencing on serial samples.Results: Twenty-nine patients from 7 centers were enrolled. In the initial DL1 (3 mg), 3 of 6 patients experienced grade 2-4 immune-related adverse events (IRAE) that were reversible with drug discontinuation and/or systemic steroids. In DL2, 4 of 5 patients experienced grade 2 or higher IRAE; thus, DL1 (3 mg/kg) was expanded with no grade 2-4 IRAEs reported in 18 additional patients. Best responses included marrow complete response (mCR) in one patient (3.4%). Prolonged stable disease (PSD) for ≥46 weeks occurred in 7 patients (24% of entire cohort and 29% of those treated with 3 mg/kg dose), including 3 patients with more than a year of SD. Five patients underwent allografting without excessive toxicity. Median survival for the group was 294 days (95% CI, 240-671+). Patients who achieved PSD or mCR had significantly higher frequency of T cells expressing ICOS (inducible T-cell co-stimulator).Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ipilimumab dosed at 3 mg/kg in patients with MDS after HMA failure is safe but has limited efficacy as a monotherapy. Increased frequency of ICOS-expressing T cells might predict clinical benefit. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3519-27. ©2018 AACR.

Pilot trial of K562/GM-CSF whole-cell vaccination in MDS patients

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell malignancies. Currently, approved drugs are given with non-curative intent as the only known cure is allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, which relies on the donor's immune system driving an allogeneic effect. Previous efforts to harness the endogenous immune system have been less successful. We present the results of a pilot study of K562/GM-CSF (GVAX) whole-cell vaccination in MDS patients. The primary objective of safety was met as there were no serious adverse events. One patient had a decrease in transfusion requirements and another demonstrated hematologic improvement suggesting a signal for clinical activity. In vitro correlative studies indicated biological effects on immune cells following vaccination. Although only a pilot study, results are encouraging that an immunotherapeutic approach with a whole-cell vaccine may be feasible in MDS patients.

Congenital bilateral anterior nasal atresia in 16 half-sibling Holstein-Friesian calves

CASE REPORT

Cases of bilateral anterior nasal atresia, sometimes referred to as arhinia or partial arhinia, are extremely rare in cattle and have only been reported as single events. This report describes the birth of 16 Holstein Friesian calves over a 3-month period, all affected with bilateral atresia of the nares and anterior nasal cavity, with 2 calves having additional severe deviation of the nasomaxillary bones and nasal septum. One affected calf was born with an anatomically normal twin. Parentage testing demonstrated that a single Holstein Friesian bull sired all cases tested.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of multiple cases of bilateral anterior nasal atresia in cattle with evidence that demonstrates a heritable condition.