Chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, genetics, risk stratification, and management

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis and bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) (myelodysplastic "[MDS]/MPN with neutrophilia" per World Health Organization [WHO]) is a MDS/MPN overlap disorder featuring dysplastic neutrophilia and circulating myeloid precursors. Both manifest with frequent hepatosplenomegaly and less commonly, bleeding, with high rates of leukemic transformation and death. The 2022 revised WHO classification conserved CNL diagnostic criteria of leukocytosis ≥25 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥80% with <10% circulating precursors, absence of dysplasia, and presence of an activating CSF3R mutation. ICC criteria are harmonized with those of other myeloid entities, with a key distinction being lower leukocytosis threshold (≥13 × 109/L) for cases CSF3R-mutated. Criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/L, dysgranulopoiesis, circulating myeloid precursors ≥10%, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (ICC). In both classifications ASXL1 and SETBP1 (ICC), or SETBP1 ± ETNK1 (WHO) mutations can be used to support the diagnosis. Both diseases show hypercellular bone marrow due to a granulocytic proliferation, aCML distinguished by dysplasia in granulocytes ± other lineages. Absence of monocytosis, rare/no basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions, are mandated. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in ~1/3 of CNL and ~15-40% of aCML patients. The molecular signature of CNL is a driver mutation in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor-classically T618I, documented in >80% of cases. Atypical CML harbors a complex genomic backdrop with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, SRSF2, EZH2, and less frequently in ETNK1. Leukemic transformation rates are ~10-25% and 30-40% for CNL and aCML, respectively. Overall survival is poor: 15-31 months in CNL and 12-20 months in aCML. The Mayo Clinic CNL risk model for survival stratifies patients according to platelets <160 × 109/L (2 points), leukocytes >60 × 109/L (1 point), and ASXL1 mutation (1 point); distinguishing low- (0-1 points) versus high-risk (2-4 points) categories. The Mayo Clinic aCML risk model attributes 1 point each for: age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, and TET2 mutation, delineating low- (0-1 risk factor) and high-risk (≥2 risk factors) subgroups. Management is risk-driven and symptom-directed, with no current standard of care. Most commonly used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, Janus kinase inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents, though none are disease-modifying. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative modality and should be considered in eligible patients. Recent genetic profiling has disclosed CBL, CEBPA, EZH2, NRAS, TET2, and U2AF1 to represent high-risk mutations in both entities. Actionable mutations (NRAS/KRAS, ETNK1) have also been identified, supporting novel agents targeting involved pathways. Preclinical and clinical studies evaluating new drugs (e.g., fedratinib, phase 2) and combinations are detailed.

STAT5B mutations in myeloid neoplasms differ by disease subtypes but characterize a subset of chronic myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia and/or basophilia

STAT5B has been reported as a recurrent mutation in myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia, but its overall frequency and importance across a spectrum of myeloid neoplasms are largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter study on a series of 82 myeloid neoplasms with STAT5B mutations detected by next-generation sequencing. The estimated frequency of STAT5B mutations in myeloid neoplasms was low, <0.5%, but mutations were detected in all categories of such neoplasms, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, 28%), acute myeloid leukemia (AML, 26%), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN, 18%), Philadelphia chromosome-negative classic MPN (12%), systemic mastocytosis (1%), and, with a notably high frequency, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS, 15%). STAT5B mutations occurred preferentially in the SH2 domain (95%), involved 12 different codons, with the N642H hotspot being the most common (78%). Co-mutations were present in all cases and clonal hierarchy analysis showed that STAT5B mutations tended to be subclonal in AML, MPN, and MDS, but frequently dominant/co-dominant in CEL-NOS (83%), followed by MDS/MPN (40%). Across the group, eosinophilia and/or basophilia were common (41%), frequently observed in cases in which STAT5B mutations were detected at initial diagnosis (P<0.0001), with a high variant allele frequency (median 42.5%, P=0.0001), as a dominant/ co-dominant clone (P<0.0001), involving the canonical N642H (P=0.0607), and associated with fewer co-mutations (P=0.0009). Our data show that the characteristics and importance of a STAT5B mutation differ among myeloid neoplasms, but if present as a dominant mutation and detected at initial diagnosis, it appears to be a driver mutation in a subgroup of chronic myeloid neoplasms, preferentially promoting a proliferation of eosinophils and basophils.

Autoimmune myelofibrosis: A Mayo Clinic series of 22 patients

We describe the clinical phenotype, management strategies and outcomes of 22 patients with autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF); median age: 45 years; 77% females; 83% with autoimmune disease, pancytopenia in 32% and transfusion-requiring anaemia in 59%. All informative cases were negative for JAK2 (n = 18) and CALR/MPL mutations (n = 12). Fourteen of nineteen (74%) evaluable patients achieved complete response (CR) based on the resolution of cytopenias. First-line treatments included steroids +/- immunosuppressive agents, cyclosporin and mycophenolate with CR in 7 of 13 (54%), 1 of 2 (50%) and 1 of 2 (50%) respectively. Rituximab salvage therapy yielded CR in 4 of 5 (80%) cases. The current study provides information on steroid-sparing treatments for AIMF.

Incidental discovery of KIT-mutated mastocytoma in a colon polyp

Mastocytoma in a colon polyp positive for tryptase, CD117/KIT, S100, weakly positive for CD25.

Predictors of clinical outcome in myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group study

OBJECTIVES

Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MPN-U, revised to MPN, not otherwise specified in the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification) is a heterogeneous category of primary marrow disorders with clinical, morphologic, and/or molecular features that preclude classification as a more specific MPN subtype due to stage at diagnosis, overlapping features between MPN subtypes, or the presence of coexisting disorders. Compared with other MPN subtypes, the contribution of the mutational landscape in MPN-U in conjunction with other clinical and morphologic biomarkers to prognosis has been less well investigated.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of MPN-U (94 cases) to better define the clinicopathologic features, genetic landscape, and clinical outcomes, including subgroups of early-stage, advanced-stage, and coexisting disorders. The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) plus scoring system was applied to assess its relevance to MPN-U prognosis.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated bone marrow blast count and DIPSS plus score as statistically significant in predicting overall survival. Univariate analysis identified additional potential poor prognostic markers, including abnormal karyotype and absence of JAK2 mutation. Secondary mutations were frequent in the subset analyzed by next-generation sequencing (26/37 cases, 70.3%) with a borderline association between high molecular risk mutations and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, as one of the largest of MPN-U studies incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular data, moves toward identification of biomarkers that better predict prognosis in this heterogeneous category.

TP53 variant allele frequency and therapy-related setting independently predict survival in myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q)

Among 210 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) with del(5q), molecular information was available at diagnosis or at least 3 months before leukaemic transformation in 146 cases. Multivariate analysis identified therapy-related setting (p = 0.02; HR 2.3) and TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥22% (p < 0.01; HR 2.8), but not SF3B1 mutation (p = 0.65), as independent risk factors for survival. Median survival was 11.7 versus 4 years (5/10-year survival 73%/52% vs. 42%/14%) in the absence (N = 112) versus presence (N = 34) of ≥1 risk factors; leukaemia-free survival was affected by TP53 VAF ≥22% (p < 0.01). Such information might inform treatment decision-making in MDS-del(5q) regarding allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Prognostic impact of SF3B1 mutation and multilineage dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts: a Mayo Clinic study of 170 informative cases

The revised 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO4R) classification lists myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) as a separate entity with single lineage (MDS-RS-SLD) or multilineage (MDS-RS-MLD) dysplasia. The more recent International Consensus Classification (ICC) distinguishes between MDS with SF3B1 mutation (MDS-SF3B1) and MDS-RS without SF3B1 mutation; the latter is instead included under the category of MDS not otherwise specified. The current study includes 170 Mayo Clinic patients with WHO4R-defined MDS-RS, including MDS-RS-SLD (N=83) and MDS-RS-MLD (N=87); a subset of 145 patients were also evaluable for the presence of SF3B1 and other mutations, including 126 with (87%) and 19 (13%) without SF3B1 mutation. Median overall survival for all 170 patients was 6.6 years with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 59% and 25%, respectively. A significant difference in overall survival was apparent between MDS-RS-MLD and MDS-RS-SLD (p<0.01) but not between MDS-RS with and without SF3B1 mutation (p=0.36). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent prognostic contribution of MLD (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8; p=0.01) and also identified age (p<0.01), transfusion need at diagnosis (p<0.01), and abnormal karyotype (p<0.01), as additional risk factors; the impact from SF3B1 or other mutations was not significant. Leukemia-free survival was independently affected by abnormal karyotype (p<0.01), RUNX1 (0.02) and IDH1 (p=0.01) mutations, but not by MLD or SF3B1 mutation. Exclusion of patients not meeting ICC-criteria for MDSSF3B1 did not change the observations on overall survival. MLD-based, as opposed to SF3B1 mutationbased, disease classification for MDS-RS might be prognostically more relevant.

Reappraisal of mast cell leukemia based on a single institution review of 16 cases: Mast cell morphology determines clinical outcome

Cytologic abnormalities of atypical mast cells in mastocytosis. The mature mast cells have oval-shaped nuclei, cytoplasmic hypogranulation and spindle-shaped cytology. or well-differentiated displaying a round nucleus with condensed chromatin, and abundant dense cytoplasmic granulations. Immature mast cells include promastocytes and metachromatic blast-like forms.

Granularity in disease classification impacts survival prediction in advanced systemic mastocytosis: A single institution study of 329 informative cases

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system categorizes advanced systemic mastocytosis (SM-Adv) into aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN). By contrast, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) requires "immature" MC cytomorphology for the diagnosis of MCL and limits SM-AHN to myeloid neoplasms (SM-AMN). The current study includes 329 patients with SM-Adv (median age 65 years, range 18-88; males 58%): WHO subcategories SM-AHN (N = 212; 64%), ASM (N = 99; 30%), and MCL (N = 18; 6%); ICC subcategories SM-AMN (N = 190; 64%), ASM (N = 99; 33%), and MCL (N = 9; 3%); WHO-defined MCL with "mature" MC cytomorphology and SM-AHN associated with lymphoid neoplasms were operationally labeled as "MCL-mature" (N = 9) and SM-ALN (N = 22), respectively, and distinguished from ICC-defined MCL and SM-AMN. Multivariable analysis that included the Mayo alliance risk factors for survival in SM (age >60 years, anemia, thrombocytopenia, increased alkaline phosphatase) revealed more accurate survival prediction with the ICC versus WHO classification order: (i) survival was significantly worse with MCL-immature versus MCL-mature (hazard ratio [HR] 15; p < .01), (ii) prognostic distinction between MCL and SM-AHN/AMN was confirmed in the context of ICC (HR 9.3; p < .01) but not WHO classification order (p = .99), (iii) survival was similar between MCL-mature and SM-AMN (p = .18), and (iv) SM-AMN (HR 1.7; p < .01) but not SM-ALN (p = .37) was prognostically distinct from ASM. The current study provides evidence for the independent prognostic contribution of both the ICC system for SM-Adv and the Mayo alliance risk factors for survival in SM.

Guide to the Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasms: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Approach

OBJECTIVES

The practicing pathologist is challenged by the ever-increasing diagnostic complexity of myeloid neoplasms. This guide is intended to provide a general roadmap from initial case detection, often triggered by complete blood count results with subsequent blood smear review, to final diagnosis.

METHODS

The integration of hematologic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features into routine practice is standard of care. The requirement for molecular genetic testing has increased along with the complexity of test types, the utility of different testing modalities in identifying key gene mutations, and the sensitivity and turnaround time for various assays.

RESULTS

Classification systems for myeloid neoplasms have evolved to achieve the goal of providing a pathology diagnosis that enhances patient care, outcome prediction, and treatment options for individual patients and is formulated, endorsed, and adopted by hematologists/oncologists.

CONCLUSIONS

This guide provides diagnostic strategies for all myeloid neoplasm subtypes. Special considerations are provided for each category of testing and neoplasm category, along with classification information, genetic testing requirements, interpretation information, and case reporting recommendations based on the experience of 11 Bone Marrow Pathology Group members.

The international consensus classification of eosinophilic disorders and systemic mastocytosis

Based on new data and increased understanding of disease molecular genetics, the international consensus classification (ICC) has made several changes in the diagnosis and classification of eosinophilic disorders and systemic mastocytosis. Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and gene rearrangements have been renamed as M/LN-eo with tyrosine kinase gene fusions (M/LN-eo-TK). The category has been expanded to include ETV6::ABL1 and FLT3 fusions, and to accept PCM1::JAK2 and its genetic variants as formal members. The overlaps and differences between M/LN-eo-TK and BCR::ABL1-like B-lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/de novo T-ALL sharing the same genetic lesions are addressed. Besides genetics, ICC for the first time has introduced bone marrow morphologic criteria in distinguishing idiopathic hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome from chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified. The major diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis (SM) in the ICC remain largely based on morphology, but several minor modifications/refinements have been made in criteria related to diagnosis, subclassification, and assessment of disease burden (B- and C-findings). This review is to focus on the ICC updates related to these disease entities, illustrated through changes related to morphology, molecular genetics, clinical features, prognosis, and treatment. Two practical algorithms are provided in navigating through the diagnosis and classification systems of hypereosinophilia and SM.

Acute leukemias with complex karyotype show a similarly poor outcome independent of mixed, myeloid or lymphoblastic immunophenotype: A study from the Bone Marrow Pathology Group

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a heterogenous group of acute leukemias characterized by leukemic blasts that express markers of multiple lineages. The revised 4th edition WHO classification of MPAL excludes AML with myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC), including those with complex karyotype (CK), from a diagnosis of MPAL. Abnormal karyotype is frequent in MPAL with the reported rate of CK in MPAL ranging from 19% to 32%. Due its rarity, the clinical and genetic features of MPAL with CK remain poorly characterized. This study aims to further characterize the genetic features of MPAL with CK in comparison to cases of AML and ALL with CK. Cases of de novo MPAL, AML, and B- and T-ALL patients with CK were collected from 8 member institutions of the Bone Marrow Pathology Group. We found no significant difference in overall survival between MPAL with CK compared to AML and ALL with CK. AML with CK was more strongly associated with TP53 mutations, however the presence of TP53 mutations conferred a worse prognosis regardless of lineage. ALL with CK seems to show increased IKZF1 mutation rates which is known to confer a worse prognosis in ALL. Additionally, MPAL with CK showed similarly poor outcomes regardless of whether a lymphoid or myeloid chemotherapy regimen is chosen. Our results suggest that acute leukemias with complex karyotype show a similarly poor outcome regardless of lineage differentiation and that mutation in TP53 confers a poor prognosis in all lineages. Our results support the exclusion of immunophenotypic MPAL with CK from MPAL and appear to confirm the approach proposed in the revised 4th edition WHO to include them as AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and similar myelodysplasia-related AML categories of newer classifications.

What’s New in the Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy of Myeloid Leukemias

Myeloid leukemias are a broad group of hematological disorders, characterized by heterogeneous clinical and biological features. In recent years, unprecedented genetic discoveries and clinical–biological correlations have revolutionized the field of myeloid leukemias. The most relevant changes have specifically occurred in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with eosinophilia. The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms has addressed these changes, providing an updated framework and revised diagnostic criteria for such entities. This is also the aim of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of hematopoietic tumors, whose preliminary version was published in 2022. Parallel to this, new therapeutic options and novel molecular targets have changed the management of many myeloid entities, including AML and CML. This review aims to address the most relevant updates in the classification and diagnosis of AML, CMML, CML and MNs with eosinophilia. The state of the art of treatment and future therapeutic options for such disorders are also discussed.

Myeloid sarcoma with NPM1 mutation may be clinically and genetically distinct from AML with NPM1 mutation: a study from the Bone Marrow Pathology Group

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is currently considered equivalent to de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the relationship between these entities is poorly understood. This retrospective multi-institutional cohort study compared 43 MS with NPM1 mutation to 106 AML with NPM1 mutation. Compared to AML, MS had more frequent cytogenetic abnormalities including complex karyotype (p = .009 and p = .007, respectively) and was enriched in mutations of genes involved in histone modification, including ASXL1 (p = .007 and p = .008, respectively). AML harbored a higher average number of gene mutations (p = .002) including more frequent PTPN11 mutations (p < .001) and mutations of DNA-methylating genes including DNMT3A and IDH1 (both p < .001). MS had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than AML (median OS: 44.9 vs. 93.2 months, respectively, p = .037). MS with NPM1 mutation has a unique genetic landscape, and poorer OS, compared to AML with NPM1 mutation.

Triple-Negative Primary Myelofibrosis: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Study

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm driven by canonical gene mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL in >80% of the cases. PMF that lacks these canonical alterations is termed triple-negative PMF (TN-PMF). The pathologic and genetic characteristics of TN-PMF compared with those of conventional PMF with canonical driver mutations (DM-PMF) have not been well studied. We aimed to identify clinicopathologic and molecular genetic differences between patients with TN-PMF (n = 56) and DM-PMF (n = 89), all of whom fulfilled the 2016 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for PMF. Compared with the control group, patients in the TN-PMF group were more likely to have thrombocytopenia and less likely to have organomegaly. The bone marrow in patients with TN-PMF showed fewer granulocytic elements and more frequent dyserythropoiesis. Cytogenetic analysis showed a higher incidence of trisomy 8. Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed a lower frequency of ASXL1 mutations but enrichment of ASXL1/SRSF2 comutations. Our findings demonstrated several clinicopathologic and molecular differences between TN-PMF and DM-PMF. These findings, particularly the observed mutation profile characterized by a higher frequency of ASXL1 and SRSF2 comutation, suggest that at least a subset of TN-PMF may be pathogenetically different from DM-PMF, with potential prognostic implications.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms with JAK2 exon 12 mutation

The presence of JAK2 exon 12 mutation was included by the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification as one of the major criteria for diagnosing polycythemia vera (PV). Few studies have evaluated the clinical presentation and bone marrow morphology of these patients and it is unclear if these patients fulfill the newly published criteria of 5th edition WHO or The International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria for PV. Forty-three patients with JAK2 exon 12 mutations were identified from the files of 7 large academic institutions. Twenty patients had complete CBC and BM data at disease onset. Fourteen patients met the diagnostic criteria for PV and the remaining six patients were diagnosed as MPN-U. At diagnosis, 9/14 patients had normal WBC and platelet counts (isolated erythrocytosis/IE subset); while 5/14 had elevated WBC and/or platelets (polycythemic /P subset). We found that hemoglobin and hematocrit tended to be lower in the polycythemia group. Regardless of presentation (P vs IE), JAK2 deletion commonly occurred in amino acids 541-544 (62 %). MPN-U patients carried JAK2 exon 12 mutation, but did not fulfill the criteria for PV. Half of the patients had hemoglobin/hematocrit below the diagnostic threshold for PV, but showed increased red blood cell count with low mean corpuscular volume (56-60 fL). Three cases lacked evidence of bone marrow hypercellularity. In summary, the future diagnostic criteria for PV may require a modification to account for the variant CBC and BM findings in some patients with JAK2 exon 12 mutation.