A practical evidence-based approach to management of type 2 diabetes in children and young people (CYP): UK consensus

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes in young people is an aggressive disease with a greater risk of complications leading to increased morbidity and mortality during the most productive years of life. Prevalence in the UK and globally is rising yet experience in managing this condition is limited. There are no consensus guidelines in the UK for the assessment and management of paediatric type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary professionals from The Association of Children's Diabetes Clinicians (ACDC) and the National Type 2 Diabetes Working Group reviewed the evidence base and made recommendations using the Grading Of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Young people with type 2 diabetes should be managed within a paediatric diabetes team with close working with adult diabetes specialists, primary care and other paediatric specialties. Diagnosis of diabetes type can be challenging with many overlapping features. Diabetes antibodies may be needed to aid diagnosis. Co-morbidities and complications are frequently present at diagnosis and should be managed holistically. Lifestyle change and metformin are the mainstay of early treatment, with some needing additional basal insulin. GLP1 agonists should be used as second-line agents once early ketosis and symptoms are controlled. Glycaemic control improves microvascular but not cardiovascular risk. Reduction in excess adiposity, smoking prevention, increased physical activity and reduction of hypertension and dyslipidaemia are essential to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence-based guideline aims to provide a practical approach in managing this condition in the UK.

National consensus to develop core outcomes for the evaluation of complications from excess weight (CEW) clinics: results of a national Delphi process

OBJECTIVE

In 2021, centres across all seven NHS-England regions were selected to develop pilot clinics with the aim of treating children and young people (CYP) living with complications relating to excess weight (CEW). We led a process to develop core outcomes to enable the evaluation of these clinics.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi process, virtual steering group meetings and two patient representation workshops were used to agree the most important outcomes for both clinicians/allied professionals and representative prospective service users.

RESULTS

A total of 119 clinicians/allied professionals were invited to contribute to the Delphi process: 62 (52%) agreed and completed round 1 and 47 of these (76%) went on to complete round 2. Six young people (age range 13-17 years) and six parents were involved in two patient representation workshops and their experiences fed into virtual steering group meetings, via a representative.There were 44 outcomes assessed in round 1 and 21 outcomes assessed in round 2. There were 16 core outcomes selected: anthropometric, glucose tolerance/insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes, blood pressure, lipid profile, breathing problems, identification of aetiology, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, quality of life, school attendance, dietary habits including disordered eating, exercise and activity habits.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an online Delphi process, patient representation workshops and virtual steering group meetings has enabled the development of core outcomes for clinical obesity services with eight physical health, five mental health and three self-management outcomes. Further work is needed to develop outcome measures to complete a core outcome set. These will be used to guide the evaluation of novel regional clinics for the treatment of complications of excess weight.

Depot buprenorphine as an opioid agonist therapy in New South Wales correctional centres: a costing model

Background

In 2019 daily liquid methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone were primary opioid agonist treatments for correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia. However, both had significant potential for diversion to other patients, and their daily administration was resource intensive. An alternative treatment in the form of subcutaneous depot buprenorphine became a viable option following a safety trial in 2020 – the UNLOC-T study. Depot preparation demonstrated advantages over current treatments as more difficult to divert and requiring fewer administrations. This paper reports the results of economic modelling of staffing costs in medication administration comparing depot buprenorphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine provision in UNLOC-T trial facilities.

Methods

The costing study adopted a micro-costing approach involving the synthesis of cost data from the UNLOC-T clinical trial as well as data collected from Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network records. Labour and materials data were collected during site observations and interviews. Costs were calculated from two payer perspectives: a) the New South Wales (state) government which funds custodial and health services; and b) the Australian Commonwealth government, which pays for medications. The analysis compared the monthly-per-patient cost for each of the three medications in trial-site facilities during July 2019. This was followed by simulation of depot buprenorphine implementation across the study population. Costs associated with medical assessment and reviews were excluded.

Results

The monthly-per-patient New South Wales government service costs of depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine were: $151, $379 and $1,529 respectively while Commonwealth government medication costs were $434, $80 and $525. The implementation simulation found that service costs of depot buprenorphine declined as patients transitioned from weekly to monthly administration. Costs of treatment using the other medications increased as patient numbers decreased alongside fixed costs. At 12 months, monthly-per-patient service costs for depot buprenorphine, methadone and sublingual buprenorphine—which would be completely phased out by month 13—were $92, $530 and $2,162 respectively.

Conclusions

Depot buprenorphine was consistently the least costly of the treatment options. Future modelling could allow for dynamic patient populations and downstream impacts for participants and the state health system.

Trial registration

ACTRN12618000942257. Registered 4 June 2018.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08687-8.

Delivering actionable infodemic insights and recommendations for the COVID-19 pandemic response

Issue

The COVID-19 pandemic and current recovery efforts have been complicated by a parallel infodemic. The infodemic has manifested itself in the rapid spread of questions, concerns and misinformation that can affect population attitudes and behavior harmful to health -promoting stigma and discrediting science, non-recommended treatments and cures, politicizing health programs and eroding trust in health workers and health systems.

Description

WHO's COVID-19 Pillar 2 (risk communication, community engagement and infodemic management) developed an integrated public health infodemic insights methodology for weekly analysis of social media, traditional media and other data sources to identify, categorize, and understand the key concerns and narratives expressed, and inform risk communication and response activities.

Results

The infodemic characterization, integrated analysis and insights generation consisted of a 3-step mixed-methods approach. First, data was collected from publicly available social and news media and categorized into categories of conversations by a COVID-19 public health taxonomy. Second, the dataset was analyzed and compared week-on-week to identify changes in narratives and conversation sentiment. Third, the digital infodemic intelligence was reviewed by a group of subject matter experts and triangulated with other data sources to derive infodemic insights and provide recommendations for action for the week. The methodology has been applied to inform COVID-19 response, COVID-19 vaccine demand promotion, and preparing for mass gatherings or mass immunization campaigns.

Lessons

The methodology for infodemic intelligence generation and integration has introduced evidence-based analytical practices for generation of infodemic insights and recommendations for action into the work of WHO. It must be further adapted for use by different health programmes and preparedness functions, and is described WHO Field Infodemiology Manual.

Key messages

• Health authorities can use infodemic insights to respond to people’s concerns, questions and information deficits in a timely and effective manner.

• An evidence-based methodology has been developed and validated to generate infodemic insights and recommendations for action during an acute health event or emergency.

Training health professionals in infodemic management to mitigate the harm caused by infodemics

Background

Due to their multifaceted impacts on health and society, understanding and controlling infodemics to support uptake of vaccines, public health and social measures, treatments, and health behaviours is rapidly becoming a priority for many health authorities. WHO has developed a comprehensive training programme to support health professionals in the new field of expertise of managing infodemics.

Objectives

The WHO infodemic management multiformat and transdisciplinary training program builds the skills and knowledge needed to prepare for and respond to infodemics. The trainings are built on WHO competency framework for building an infodemic response workforce. The methodology used relies on human-centred and emotional design evidence and practice and uses evaluation for continuous learning design improvement.

Results

Since November 2020, three WHO global trainings organized online with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNICEF and other partners, including four-week-long simulation exercises, creating a network of 772 infodemic managers in 133 countries. A “train-the-trainers” companion package was prepared and by April 2022 delivered in Iran and Malaysia. Deep dive training modules on specialist infodemic management practice topics have been prepared for use at country level. In addition, a comprehensive set of self-paced free online courses enhances infodemic literacy and resilience to misinformation. Between December 2021 and April 2022, the OpenWHO Infodemic Management 101 course reached over 17 000 enrolments. The training programme will be updated based on evaluations, the feedback from field responders and the updated to the WHO competency framework for infodemic management workforce.

Conclusions

The WHO multiformat blended training program allows an efficient and rapid dissemination of infodemic management skills and knowledge.

Key messages

• A global network of trained infodemic managers is ready to support national preparedness and response planning.

• Skills and knowledge in infodemic management are accessible to all thanks to free online courses.

Measuring the burden of infodemics on health outcomes through harmonized global metrics

Issue/problem

Infodemics happen when an excess of information makes it difficult for people to discern what they see and hear to make good health decisions. Several challenges limit the usefulness of applying infodemiology research to the practice of managing infodemics including inconsistency in how information exposure is measured and a lack of focus on assessing associations with health behaviors.

Description of the problem

In 2021, WHO partnered with the University of Sydney to develop a study toolkit. We sought to create novel tools for measuring information exposure that can be easily deployed, linked to surveys measuring health behaviors, and implements a standardized study protocol so that data can be directly synthesized into a global analysis of information risk factors associated with health behaviors.

Results

A web-based study platform was developed, comprising tools for capturing information exposures within studies that link to health behavior surveys. The first tool is a smartphone application that asks users to actively record relevant information they see or hear in diary. The second application is a web browser plugin that passively tracks webpages with relevant keywords. Because localized studies follow a standardized protocol and de-identified participant data are recorded in a common format, local study investigators can opt-in to contributing study data to support global surveillance efforts.

Lessons

Through standardization of measurement tools and relevant study protocols, the toolkit can be used to quickly collect and synthesize data for global or regional analysis of infodemics, including in Europe. Validation of the toolkit in the field is needed to inform its open-source release.

Key messages

• A toolkit for measuring information risk factors associated with behavioral outcomes was developed.

• Global collaboration using the toolkit can improve synthesisability of studies investigating infodemic burden of disease.

OP0162 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LENABASUM IN THE PHASE 3 DETERMINE TRIAL IN DERMATOMYOSITIS

Background

Safe and effective treatments are of significant unmet need in DM. Lenabasum, a CB2 agonist that activates resolution of inflammation, improved skin disease, patient-reported outcomes, and biomarkers in a Phase 2 study of DM patients with active skin disease.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenabasum in a Phase 3 double-blind study in DM.

Methods

DM patients ≥ 18 years old with active skin with or without muscle involvement were enrolled in 55 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Stable doses of background immunosuppressants were allowed. Subjects were randomized 2:1:2 to lenabasum 20 mg BID, lenabasum 5 mg BID, or placebo BID for 52 weeks, with visits ≤ 8 weeks apart. The study was stopped after all subjects completed Week 28. Some subjects had completed Week 52 by then. The primary efficacy endpoint was Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 28 and a secondary efficacy endpoint was TIS at Week 52, for lenabasum 20 mg BID vs placebo.

Results

175 subjects (69 lenabasum 20 mg BID, 35 lenabasum 5 mg BID, 71 placebo BID) received study drug; 167 completed Week 28, and 103 completed Week 52. The most common reasons for study discontinuation were study stopped by Sponsor (34.3%), withdrawal of consent (4.5%), and adverse events (AEs, 3.9%), with similar rates among groups. Baseline demographics and disease measurements were similar among groups and in total subjects were (mean or %): age 52.0 years; 81.1% female, 75.4% White; MMT-8 133.3; CDASI activity score 23.4; HAQ-DI 0.84, MDGA 5.55, EMGA 5.23; and PtGA 5.12. Corticosteroids were used by 48.1% and 38.0%, immunoglobulins by 5.8% and 7.0%, and other immunosuppressives by 51.0% and 54.9%, and monoclonal antibodies by 8.7% and 7.0% of lenabasum and placebo groups at baseline, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met - mean (SD) TIS score was 28.3 (19.75) vs 27.2 (19.23) at Week 28 for lenabasum 20 mg BID vs placebo, p = 0.3311, MMRM. Week 52 values were 40.6 (16.88) vs 34.8 (19.94), p = 0.2290. When analyses were restricted to subjects with muscle weakness at baseline (MMT8 < 142), TIS scores and treatment differences were greater and reached nominal statistical significance at Week 40, p = 0.0172. Mean (SD) improvements in CDASI activity score were numerically greater but not statistically different between lenabasum 20 mg BID group vs placebo at Week 28 [-7.1 (7.76) vs -5.8 (8.88) points, p = 0.2775] and Week 52 [-10.0 (9.45) vs -6.2 (12.8) points, p = 0.0932]. When restricting analysis of participants without muscle weakness (MMT-8 = 150), improvement in CDASI activity score was greater in the lenabasum 20 mg BID group vs placebo at Week 28, p = 0.0461, and Week 52 p = 0.0059.

Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 87.0%, 85.7%, and 87.3% of lenabasum 20 mg BID, lenabasum 5 mg BID, and placebo groups, with no deaths. Related TEAEs leading to withdrawal of study product were infrequent, occurring in 1.4%, 0%, and 2.0% of subjects in the same groups. Serious TEAEs occurred in 11.6%, 8.6%, and 4.2% of subjects in the lenabasum 20 mg BID, lenabasum 5 mg BID, and placebo groups. No serious TEAE preferred term occurred in more than 1 subject in any group. TEAE occurring in ≥ 10% of lenabasum 20 mg BID subjects were (% lenabasum vs % placebo): dermatomyositis (flare) 27.5% vs 40.8%; diarrhea 14.5% vs 8.5%; dizziness 13.0% vs 4.2%; nausea 11.6% vs 4.2%; headache 10.1% vs 14.1%; and arthralgia 10.1% vs 2.8%.

Conclusion

Although, primary or secondary endpoints were not met in the study, subgroup analysis of patients with muscle weakness and without muscle weakness, showed improvement in muscle strength and rash, respectively in lenabasum 20 mg BID group vs placebo. Lenabasum was administered safely and was well-tolerated in this study.

Disclosure of Interests

Victoria Werth Speakers bureau: University of Pennsylvania, who own the copyright for the CLASI and SDASI, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chrysalis, CSL Behring, Cugene, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, GSK, Incyte, Idera, Janssen, Kirin, Medimmune, Medscape, Nektar, Octapharma, Pfizer, Principa, Regeneron, Resolve, and Viela Bio, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Biogen, Celgene, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Syntimmune, and Viela Bio, Barbara White Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Previous employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Nancy Dgetluck Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Kathleen Hally Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Scott Constantine Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Rohit Aggarwal Consultant of: For Abbvie, Q32, Alexion, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Csl Behring, EMD Serono, Galapagos, Janssen, Kezar, Jubliant, Kyverna, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Pfizer, Octazyme, Roivant, Scipher., Grant/research support from: BMS, Mallinkrodt, EMD Serono, Q32, Pfizer, David Fiorentino Consultant of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Ingrid E. Lundberg Shareholder of: Roche and Novartis., Consultant of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myer´s Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceutical, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Argenx, Octapharma, Kezaar, Orphazyme, and Janssen, Grant/research support from: Astra Zeneca, Chester V Oddis Consultant of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals

AB1485 PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND BIOMARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CUTANEOUS DERMATOMYOSITIS AREA AND SEVERITY ACTIVITY (CDASI-A) SCORE IN A PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL IN DERMATOMYOSITIS

Background

Retrospective reviews of clinical databases from two sites have identified strong relationships between patient-reported outcomes and skin activity in dermatomyositis (DM), as measured by CDASI-A.1,2 No studies validate these associations in a controlled setting. Additionally, the relationship between the PROMIS-29 Short Form and skin activity in DM has not been assessed. Previous investigations have demonstrated a correlation between IL-31 and itch in DM.3 IFN-β and IFN-γ are known type I and II interferons, which are critical drivers of DM pathogenesis.4

Objectives

To assess correlations between CDASI-A, quality of life (QoL), and biomarkers of disease activity in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from five visits of a Phase 2 trial evaluating Lenabasum, a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist. Quality of life assessments extracted from the trial included Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) scores, PROMIS domains, and Skindex domains. Skindex question 10, regarding itch, was included in the analysis as a separate domain. Physician Global Assessment scores were also evaluated. Additionally, biomarkers derived from skin samples via IHC/PCR collected at visits 1 and 6 were assessed for predictors of CDASI-A response and association with disease activity. Analysis used linear mixed effect models to account for within subject-variability and repeated measures, where applicable. Analysis was performed without regard to treatment arm, as our goal was to correlate CDASI, QoL, and biomarkers among all subjects.

Results

Data from 22 subjects with DM and a combined total of 110 visits were included. Biopsies were collected from 12 subjects. Improvement in CDASI-A significantly correlated with Skindex-S, Skindex-E, Skindex-F, Skindex-Itch, PtGA global skin, PtGA global skin, PtGA global skin, and PtGA global skin, with p < 0.001. Improvement in PROMIS social role (p = 0.046) correlated with improvement in CDASI-A. Worsening of PROMIS fatigue (p = 0.019) and pain (p < 0.001) correlated with improvement in CDASI-A. Decreases in PGA overall disease, PGA skin activity, and PGA global skin all correlated with improvement of CDASI-A (p < 0.001). Change in IL-31 protein area positively correlated with change in disease activity (p = 0.047). A positive relationship between changes in IFN-β and IFN-γ protein area and disease activity trended towards significance.

Conclusion

In accordance with previous investigations from our group, well-established measures of QoL correlated significantly with CDASI-A. These findings support that CDASI-A reflects both clinical and patient-reported aspects of skin disease and is an appropriate outcome in DM clinical trials. Additionally, Skindex and PtGA scores may better relate to skin activity as measured by the CDASI compared to PROMIS domains. IL-31, a cytokine previously associated with itch in DM,3 correlated significantly with CDASI-A in our study. Trends for IFN-β and IFN-γ reduction with disease improvement support their role in the pathogenesis of DM. This study helps define patient-reported outcomes and biomarkers that may be informative in DM trials.

References

[1]Goreshi R, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1107-1116

[2]Robinson ES, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(1):169-174.

[3]Patel J, et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(9):2151-2160.

[4]Wong D, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29161

Disclosure of Interests

Joshua Dan: None declared, Jay Patel: None declared, Grant Sprow: None declared, Josef Concha: None declared, Rui Feng: None declared, Nilesh Kodali: None declared, Thomas Vazquez: None declared, DeAnna Diaz: None declared, Barbara White Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Victoria Werth Speakers bureau: University of Pennsylvania, which owns the copyright for the CDASI, Grant/research support from: Corbus Pharmaceuticals

POS0315 LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LENABASUM DURING 3 YEARS IN AN OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION (OLE) OF A PHASE 2 STUDY OF LENABASUM IN REFRACTORY SKIN DISEASE IN DERMATOMYOSITIS (DM)

Background:

Lenabasum is a synthetic, non-immunosuppressive, selective cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist that activates resolution of inflammation. Lenabasum had acceptable safety and tolerability and improved efficacy outcomes in the initial 16-week double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Part A of Phase 2 trial JBT101-DM-001 (NCT02466243) in DM subjects with refractory skin involvement. In that study, lenabasum or placebo was added to stable background treatment, with immunosuppressive therapies allowed.

Objectives:

To assess long-term safety and efficacy in DM subjects in this study.

Methods:

Subjects who completed Part A of the Phase 2 study (n = 22) were eligible to receive oral lenabasum 20 mg BID in an open-label extension (OLE) that assessed safety and efficacy at 4 weeks, then every 8 weeks.

Results:

20/22 (91%) eligible subjects enrolled in the OLE, following a mean interval of 31 weeks from the end of Part A, during which they continued to receive standard-of care treatments, to the start of the OLE during which lenabasum 20 mg BID was added. 17/20 (85%) subjects were on stable baseline immunosuppressive drugs. At the time of this data cut-off, 17 subjects were still enrolled, 17 had completed 140 months (2.7 years), and 15 had completed 156 months (3 years) of OLE dosing.

All OLE subjects experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE), with 118 AEs during the OLE through Dec 2020. Most AEs were mild (n = 111, 94%), with 2 severe AEs (fatigue and metastatic prostate cancer) considered unrelated to lenabasum. AEs occurring in ≥ 3/20 OLE subjects were: URI (n = 5); fatigue (n = 4); nausea (n = 3); common cold (n = 3); UTI (n = 3); and DM flare (n = 3). No serious AEs related to lenabasum have been reported in this OLE to date. No subject discontinued the OLE because of an AE related to lenabasum.

Improvement was seen in multiple physician- and patient-reported efficacy outcomes. CDASI activity score improved through the first 15 months of lenabasum treatment in the OLE and remained stable thereafter, with an improvement of ~20 points from the beginning of the study maintained from Month 15 through Year 3 in the OLE. CDASI damage score increased through the first year of the OLE, even though skin activity was decreasing, but lessened thereafter, returning after 3 years to about the same level it was at the beginning of the OLE. Other outcomes shown in Figure 1 followed the same general pattern as CDASI activity score, with improvement through the first 12-16 months of the OLE, then stability thereafter. Of note, 2 subjects had disease flares shortly after stopping lenabasum for conclusion of the OLE.

Conclusion:

Lenabasum continues to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile in the OLE of the Phase 2 trial JBT101-DM-001 with no serious AEs or study discontinuations related to lenabasum. The CDASI activity score and multiple other physician and patient-reported outcomes improved and have remained stable, showing durability of improvement in these patients with refractory skin disease. Skin damage was reversible and began to improve once skin activity stabilized. The limitations of attributing this improvement to lenabasum in the setting of open-label dosing is acknowledged. These data support further testing of lenabasum for the treatment of DM, and a Phase 3 study of lenabasum in DM is ongoing.

Figure 1.

Change from Baseline in Selected Efficacy Outcomes in OLE of Phase 2 Trial JBT101-DM-001

Disclosure of Interests:

Victoria Werth Grant/research support from: Investigator for Corbus Pharmaceuticals and received funding to conduct trials, Josef Concha: None declared, Julie Burroughs: None declared, Joyce Okawa: None declared, Rui Feng: None declared, Anisha Jobanputra: None declared, Robert Borucki: None declared, Kathleen Hally Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Emily Hejazi: None declared, Michael Tillinger Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Scott Constantine Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Nancy Dgetluck Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Barbara White Employee of: Employee and stockholder of Corbus Pharmaceuticals

Early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts are safe and effective in avoiding recurrent tunneled central catheter infection

Objective

Tunneled central venous catheter infection (TCVCi) is a common complication that often necessitates removal of the TCVC and a further TCVC. Theoeretically, insertion of an early-cannualtion graft (ecAVG) early after TCVC infection is possible but not widely practiced with concerns over safety and infection in the ecAVG. With 8 years of ecAVG experience, the aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following TCVC infection, comparing replacement with TCVC (TCVCr) versus immediate ecAVG (ecAVGr).

Methods

Retrospective comparison of two cohorts, who underwent replacement of an infected TCVC either by an early cannulation graft (n = 18) or by a further central catheter (n = 39).

Data were abstracted from a prospectively completed electronic patient record and collected on patient demographics, TCVC insertion, duration and infection, including culture proven bacteriaemia and subsequent access interventions.

Results

18/299 patients identified from 2012-2020 had an ecAVG implanted as treatment for a TCVCi. In a one-year time-period (1/1/2015 -31/12/2015) out of 222 TCVC inserted, 39 were as a replacement following a TCVCi. No patient with an ecAVGr developed an immediate infection, nor complication from the procedure. The rate of subsequent vascular access infection was significantly more frequent for those with TCVCr than with an ecAVGr (0.6 vs. 0.1/patient/ 1000 HD days, p &lt; 0.000). The number of further TCVC required was significantly higher in the TCVCr group (7.1 vs. 0.4/patient/ 1000 HD days, p = 0.000).

Conclusion

An ecAVG early following a TCVC infection is safe, reduces the incidence of subsequent infectious complications and reduces the number of TCVC required, with a better functional patency.

OP0171 PHASE 3 TRIAL OF LENABASUM, A CB2 AGONIST, FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

Lenabasum is an oral CB2 agonist that attenuates inflammation and fibrosis in SSc animal models and showed clinical benefit with acceptable safety in a Phase 2 trial in dcSSc.

Objectives:

Test efficacy and safety of lenabasum in a Phase 3 trial in dcSSc.

Methods:

Subjects ≥18 years old with disease duration ≤ 6 years were randomized 1:1:1 to lenabasum 5 mg, 20 mg, or placebo (PBO), all BID, with stable background immunosuppressant therapy (IST) allowed. The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR CRISS score, and secondary endpoints were ΔmRSS, ΔHAQ-DI, and ΔFVC, all at Week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO.

Results:

363 adults were dosed; 37 (10%) stopped study drug early, with only 1 subject (PBO cohort) stopping due to adverse event (AE). Baseline demographics were similar among groups. Disease duration was ≤ 3 years in 60% and 66%, mean mRSS score was 22.0 and 23.3, and background IST was used by 89% and 84% of lenabasum 20 mg and PBO groups, respectively.

Safety results showed serious AEs and severe AEs occurred in 9.2% and 5.8% vs 14.6% and 13.0%, respectively, of lenabasum 20 mg and PBO groups.

Efficacy results (Table) demonstrated:

Table 1.

Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints and post-hoc analyses, Week 52

Group, by IST treatmentCohortNΔmRSS, mean (SD)ΔFVC% mean (SD)ΔFVC, mL mean (SD)ΔHAQ-DI mean (SD)ACR CRISS medianmITT population, MMRM primary analysis methodAllPlacebo123-8.1 (7.72)-1.0 (8.68)-51 (317)-0.13 (0.468)0.887Lenabasum 20 mg120-6.7 (6.59)-1.6 (6.91)-78 (265)-0.13 (0.436)0.888Placebo subjects, per protocol completers, LOCFNo ISTPlacebo16-2.3 (9.4)-2.8 (7.4)-97 (244)0.12 (0.34)0.417All ISTPlacebo97-8.9 (7.07)-1.0 (9.2)-43 (330)-0.17 (0.474)0.936MMF, no other ISTPlacebo29-10.7 (8.1)-0.58 (7.1)-37 (235)-0.12 (0.456)0.935MMF ≤ 2 years, no other ISTPlacebo23-11.7 (8.1)-0.3 (6.0)-41 (197)-0.13 (0.495)0.935Non-MMF ≤ 2 yearsPlacebo24-6.7 (6.2)-1.4 (7.87)-52 (281)-0.15 (0.357)0.931Post-hoc comparisons, per protocol completers, LOCFNo ISTPlacebo16-2.3 (9.4)-2.8 (7.4)-97 (244)0.12 (0.34)0.417Lenabasum 20 mg10-6.3 (6.02)-2.3 (5.58)-99 (209)-0.06 (0.498)0.811Established IST1Placebo26-6.1 (5.35)-4.6 (10.11)-170 (350)-0.17 (0.445)0.619Lenabasum 20 mg38-7.4 (5.08)-0.4 (5.70)2-21 (233)3-0.07 (0.357)0.941Established IST, subjects with ILDPlacebo22-5.9 (5.28)-3.7 (5.43)-133 (206)-0.10 (0.372)0.553Lenabasum 20 mg33-7.2 (5.70)-1.0 (10.5)-47 (365)-0.06 (0.391)0.819

2 P = 0.0386 two-sample t-test; 3 P = 0.0481 two-sample t-test; other comparisons were not significant

• No significant differences were seen in primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. Primary MMRM analyses with treatment-by-time-by-subgroup interactions showed that background mycophenolate (MMF) significantly influenced the outcome

•oSubjects on no IST with disease duration ≤3 years were only 7% of PBO subjects and showed little improvement on PBO, in line with other dcSSc trials in which IST was restricted. Post-hoc subgroup analyses of these subjects on no IST suggested improvement in ΔmRSS and ΔHAQ-DI, for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO

•uUnexpectedly high improvement occurred in PBO subjects receiving IST, notably those on MMF started within 2 years of baseline

•nPost-hoc analyses of subjects on established IST (MMF or, if no MMF, ≥ 1 non-MMF IST started > 2 years before baseline) suggested improvement in ΔFVC% (nominal P = 0.0386) and ΔFVC mL (nominal P = 0.0481) for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO. Improvement in FVC was also seen in subjects on established IST who had ILD at baseline, lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO

•mACR CRISS score demonstrated a ceiling effect and correlated most highly with ΔmRSS (r = -0.739) and moderately with MDGA (-0.432), HAQ-DI (-0.362), FVC% (0.366), and PtGA (-0.288)

Conclusion:

Lenabasum was safely used in this study. Unexpectedly high improvement on background IST, especially MMF, has not been previously reported at this level. The primary endpoint was not met. Post-hoc analyses showed greater improvement in lenabasum- vs PBO-treated subjects who were not on background IST and those on established IST, including subjects with ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Robert Spiera Consultant of: Abbvie, Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Formation Biologics, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Formation Biologics, Sanofi, Inflarx, Astra Zeneca, Kadmon, Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Janssen, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corbus, Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, MBL, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc (less than 5%). Leadership/Equity position – Chief Medical Officer, CiviBioPharma/Eicos Sciences, Inc, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Corbus, Gilead, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Horizon, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and United Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: NIH, Immune Tolerance Network, Bayer, BMS, Horizon, Pfizer, Laura Hummers Consultant of: CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals. Corbus, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medpace, Kadmon, Cumberland, CSL Behring, Tracy Frech Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Wendy Stevens Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Jessica Gordon Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals. Research funding for EICOS Pharmaceuticals and Cumberland Pharmaceuticals., Suzanne Kafaja Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Consultant of: Actelion, Janssen, Inventiva, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Corbus, Galapagos, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Regeneron, Acceleron, MSD, Chemomab, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Oliver Distler Consultant of: Consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB., Eun Bong Lee Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Yair Levy Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Jae-Bum Jun Consultant of: Consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim Korea, Jeil Pharma, Dae Woong Pharma, Kwangdong Pharma, and Sama Pharma., Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Scott Constantine Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Nancy Dgetluck Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Barbara White Employee of: Employee and stockholder of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Daniel Furst Consultant of: Corbus, Galapagos, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Actelion, Amgen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Gilead, Talaris, and Boehringer Ingelheim., Grant/research support from: grants from Corbus, Galapagos, GSK, Pfizer, Talaris, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Christopher Denton Consultant of: Consultancy fees and/or honoraria from Corbus, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Sanofi, Galapagos, Inventiva, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, CSL Behring, Acceleron, Horizon, Arxx Therapeutics

Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling

Machine learning (ML) provides novel and powerful ways of accurately and efficiently recognizing complex patterns, emulating nonlinear dynamics, and predicting the spatio-temporal evolution of weather and climate processes. Off-the-shelf ML models, however, do not necessarily obey the fundamental governing laws of physical systems, nor do they generalize well to scenarios on which they have not been trained. We survey systematic approaches to incorporating physics and domain knowledge into ML models and distill these approaches into broad categories. Through 10 case studies, we show how these approaches have been used successfully for emulating, downscaling, and forecasting weather and climate processes. The accomplishments of these studies include greater physical consistency, reduced training time, improved data efficiency, and better generalization. Finally, we synthesize the lessons learned and identify scientific, diagnostic, computational, and resource challenges for developing truly robust and reliable physics-informed ML models for weather and climate processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'.

Early-Cannulation Arteriovenous Grafts Are Safe and Effective in Avoiding Recurrent Tunneled Central Catheter Infection

OBJECTIVES

Tunneled central venous catheter infection (TCVCi) is a common complication that often necessitates removal of the TCVC and replacement by a further TCVC. Theoretically, insertion of an early - cannulation graft (ecAVG) early after TCVC infection is possible but not widely practiced with concerns over safety and infection in the ecAVG. With 8 years of ecAVG experience, the aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following TCVC infection, comparing replacement with TCVC (TCVCr) versus immediate ecAVG (ecAVGr).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of 2 cohorts, who underwent replacement of an infected TCVC either by an early cannulation graft (n = 18) or by a further central catheter (n = 39).

METHODS

Data were abstracted from a prospectively completed electronic patient record and collected on patient demographics, TCVC insertion, duration and infection, including culture proven bacteriaemia and subsequent access interventions.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 299 patients identified from 2012 to 2020 had an ecAVG implanted as treatment for a TCVCi. In a 1-year time-period (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2015) out of 222 TCVC inserted, 39 were as a replacement following a TCVCi. No patient with an ecAVGr developed an immediate infection, nor complication from the procedure. The rate of subsequent vascular access infection was significantly more frequent for those with a TCVCr than with an ecAVGr (0.6 vs. 0.1/patient/1000 HD days, P< 0.000). The number of further TCVC required was significantly higher in the TCVCr group (7.1 vs. 0.4/patient/1000 HD days, P= 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

An ecAVG early following a TCVC infection is safe, reduces the incidence of subsequent infectious complications and reduces the number of TCVC required, with a better functional patency.

Epidemiology of bloodstream infections in a Scottish haemodialysis population with focus on vascular access method

BACKGROUND

Infection is the second highest cause of mortality in end-stage renal disease, with a significant proportion relating to haemodialysis (HD) vascular access-related infection (VARI).

AIM

To report the rate and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of all-source bloodstream infections (BSIs) by vascular access type in a Scottish HD cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was undertaken of data on adult patients attending seven HD units during 2017. Total HD days for each vascular access type were calculated. BSIs were analysed with rates expressed per 1000 HD days. AMR was verified using health board microbiology databases.

FINDINGS

Excluding contaminant organisms, there was an overall BSI rate of 0.57 per 1000 HD days. The highest all-source and vascular access-related infection (VARI) BSI rates per 1000 HD days were in the non-tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) group (3.11 and 2.07 respectively), followed by tunnelled CVC (1.10 and 0.67), arteriovenous graft (0.51 and 0.31), and finally arteriovenous fistula (0.29 and 0.02). The non-VARI BSI rates were lowest in the arteriovenous graft group. Staphylococci comprised the majority of events, with Staphylococcus aureus implicated in 29%. Gram-negative BSIs were prevalent, particularly in CVC groups, and associated with higher mortality. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus and carbapenem resistance were relatively low. MDR Gram-negatives were high compared with the Scottish population.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous fistula access is confirmed as having lowest all-source and VARI BSI rates, and arteriovenous graft access the lowest non-VARI BSI rates. Staphylococci remain the prevailing genus; however, the contributions of Gram-negative BSIs, the higher mortality, and proportion of MDR organisms in this group are notable.

From 'OPAT' to 'COpAT': implications of the OVIVA study for ambulatory management of bone and joint infection

Bone and joint infection contributes significantly to clinical activity within outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services. The OVIVA (oral versus intravenous antibiotics for bone and joint infection) randomized study has challenged the practice of prolonged intravenous therapy, because non-inferiority of oral antibiotic therapy was demonstrated, thereby implying that early transition to oral therapy is an appropriate alternative to prolonged intravenous therapy. We examine the caveats to the study and discuss the implications for OPAT practice, highlighting the importance of careful oral antibiotic selection with attention to bioavailability, bone penetration, drug interactions, compliance and toxicity monitoring. We emphasize that ambulatory antibiotic therapy (whether intravenous or oral) in this patient group requires expert multidisciplinary management, monitoring and follow-up, and ideally should be undertaken within existing OPAT or, more accurately, complex outpatient antibiotic therapy (COpAT) services.

AB0152 LENABASUM, A CB2 AGONIST, INHIBITS INFLAMMASOME ACTIVATION

Background:

Upregulation of the innate immune response via the activity of Toll-like receptors and the NLRP3 inflammasome have been suggested as initiating events that can drive fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc) (Pharmacol Ther. 2018;192:163). Lenabasum, a cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonist, is known to activate the resolution phase of acute human innate immune responses triggered through Toll-like receptor activation, favoring production of pro-resolving lipid mediators, reducing inflammatory infiltrates, and increasing bacterial clearance (Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104:675). Given the potential importance of inflammasome activation in the pathogenesis of SSc, the question remained whether lenabasum inhibits inflammasome activation.

Objectives:

Assess effects of lenabasum on IL-1β and IL-18 production induced by inflammasome activation.

Methods:

Primary human macrophages were derived from monocytes, stimulated with LPS and ATP to active inflammasomes and cultured with lenabasum. Levels of IL-1β and IL-18 were measured in cell supernatants by ELISA. Separately, human PBMC were activated with 0.1 µg/ml LPS ± 10 µM lenabasum for 24 hours, and effects of lenabasum on the levels of IL-1β and other pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured.

Results:

Lenabasum significantly inhibited IL-1β and IL-18 secretion by monocyte-derived macrophages, with IC50= 66.73 ± 3.92 nM and 349.23 ± 21.27 nM, respectively. A control inflammasome activation inhibitor, MCC950, which showed IC50= 18.33 ± 1.22 nM for IL-1 β inhibition and IC50= 21.43 ± 0.81 nM for IL-8 inhibition.

Conclusion:

Lenabasum inhibits inflammasome activation, which could contribute to potential therapeutic efficacy in SSc and other autoimmune diseases.

References:

[1]Henderson, J., S. Bhattacharyya, J. Varga, and S. O’Reilly. 2018. ‘Targeting TLRs and the inflammasome in systemic sclerosis’, Pharmacol Ther, 192: 163-69.

[2]Motwani, M. P., F. Bennett, P. C. Norris, A. A. Maini, M. J. George, J. Newson, A. Henderson, A. J. Hobbs, M. Tepper, B. White, C. N. Serhan, R. MacAllister, and D. W. Gilroy. 2018. ‘Potent Anti-Inflammatory and Pro-Resolving Effects of Anabasum in a Human Model of Self-Resolving Acute Inflammation’, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 104: 675-86.

Disclosure of Interests:

Subba Chintalacharuvu Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ping Zang Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Barbara White Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sergei Atamas Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

AB0568 BASELINE EUROPEAN PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS AND DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHASE 3 STUDY OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LENABASUM, A CB2 AGONIST, IN DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:

We previously presented on the baseline characteristics of a large cohort of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) patients enrolled in a Phase 3 trial of lenabasum, a selective cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) agonist. Lenabasum, was safe and well-tolerated in a prior Phase 2 study in dcSSc patients and associated with improvements in ACR Combined Response Index Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score and multiple secondary efficacy outcomes.

Objectives:

We now report on the background standard of care and baseline disease characteristics of European (EU) patients in order to assess variability by geographic regions.

Methods:

The RESOLVE-1 Phase 3 study was designed with input from study investigators and regulatory authorities. An important intent of the design was to have eligibility criteria that allow testing of efficacy and safety of lenabasum in an inclusive group of dcSSc subjects to maximize relevance to patients in current practice. The study is ongoing and remains blinded.

Results:

Primary efficacy outcome is the ACR CRISS score at 12 months, comparing lenabasum 20 mg BID to placebo. Key inclusion criteria are males and females ≥ 18 years of age with dcSSc and disease duration ≤ 6 years who are on stable standard of care medicines, with background stable immunosuppressive mediations allowed. Baseline mRSS needed to be ≥ 15 if disease duration was > 3 to ≤ 6 years at enrollment. The study enrolled 110 EU subjects over 15 months who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug at 20 sites in 7 countries. Baseline characteristics as shown in Table 1. The majority were middle-aged, female, and white, and 80% were on immunosuppressive drugs in EU region; methotrexate (MTX) used in 30% of subjects, mycophenolate/mycophenolic acid (MMF) used in 46% of subjects, and 43% of subjects took ≥ 2 concurrent immunosuppressive drugs. There were regional differences in background immunosuppressive with use of MTX, MMF and corticosteroids highest in EU, NA and Asia, respectively.

Table 1.

Patient Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics by Regions (Blinded)

Characteristic at First DoseMean (SD) or %RegionEuropeUS, CA, AU, ILAsiaN =110 (30.1%)N = 189 (51.8%)N = 66 (18.1%)Years of age51 ± 11.751 ± 13.549 ± 13.2Female75%78%71%ILD55%40%58%Caucasian101 (91.8%)148 (78.3%)0 (0.0%)Asian2 (1.8%)10 (5.3%)66 (100.0%)Black2 (1.8%)16 (8.5%)0 (0.0%)Other5 (4.6%)15 (7.9%)0 (0.0%)Any immunosuppressive drug80%89%79%≥ 2 immunosuppressive drugs43%48%38%Mycophenolate46%70%26%Corticosteroids31%31%53%Methotrexate30%22%23%Other31%41%26%Modified Rodnan Skin Score21.9 ± 7.7523.8 ± 8.4120.0 ± 7.72Physician Global Assessment5.9 ± 1.575.3 ± 1.565.0 ± 1.50Patient Global Assessment4.9 ± 2.025.0 ± 2.254.8 ± 1.89HAQ-DI with aids/devices1.0 ± 0.691.3 ± 0.760.7 ± 0.77Forced vital capacity % predicted83.2 ± 18.9277.5 ± 16.4182.5 ± 14.73

Conclusion:

This is the first Phase 3 study to use ACR CRISS as the primary efficacy outcome, a composite outcome of multiple clinically relevant measures of SSc, and the largest interventional study to date in diffuse cutaneous SSc. While the use of background immunosuppressive therapies is significant irrespective of geographic regions, MTX use is highest in the EU. Benefits of having inclusive eligibility criteria are that they facilitated timely full enrollment and will make the study more relevant to real-world practice. This study provides a model for future Phase 3 trials in dcSSc and will afford valuable information regarding scleroderma care in practice as well as evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenabasum.

Disclosure of Interests:

Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Bradley Bloom Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Nancy Dgetluck Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Barbara White Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Robert Spiera Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Forbius, Sanofi, Inflarx, Consultant of: Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Forbius, Mistubishi Tanabe

Improving the assessment and management of obesity in UK children and adolescents: the PROMISE research programme including a RCT

Background

Five linked studies were undertaken to inform identified evidence gaps in the childhood obesity pathway.

Objectives

(1) To scope the impact of the National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) (study A). (2) To develop a brief evidence-based electronic assessment and management tool (study B). (3) To develop evidence-based algorithms for identifying the risk of obesity comorbidities (study B). (4) To conduct an efficacy trial of the Healthy Eating and Lifestyle Programme (HELP) (study C). (5) To improve the prescribing of anti-obesity drugs in UK adolescents (study D). (6) To investigate the safety, outcomes and predictors of outcome of adolescent bariatric surgery in the UK (study E).

Methods

Five substudies – (1) a parental survey before and after feedback from the National Childhood Measurement Programme, (2) risk algorithm development and piloting of a new primary care management tool, (3) a randomised controlled trial of the Healthy Eating and Lifestyle Programme, (4) quantitative and qualitative studies of anti-obesity drug treatment in adolescents and (5) a prospective clinical audit and cost-effectiveness evaluation of adolescent bariatric surgery in one centre.

Results

Study A – before the National Childhood Measurement Programme feedback, three-quarters of parents of overweight and obese children did not recognise their child to be overweight. Eighty-seven per cent of parents found the National Childhood Measurement Programme feedback to be helpful. Feedback had positive effects on parental knowledge, perceptions and intentions. Study B – risk estimation models for cardiovascular and psychosocial comorbidities of obesity require further development. An online consultation tool for primary care practitioners is acceptable and feasible. Study C – the Healthy Eating and Lifestyle Programme, when delivered in the community by graduate mental health workers, showed no significant effect on body mass index at 6 months (primary outcome) when compared with enhanced usual care. Study D – anti-obesity drugs appear efficacious in meta-analysis, and their use has expanded rapidly in the last decade. However, the majority of prescriptions are rapidly discontinued after 1–3 months of treatment. Few young people described positive experiences of anti-obesity drugs. Prescribing was rarely compliant with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. Study E – bariatric surgery appears safe, effective and highly cost-effective in adolescents in the NHS.

Future work and limitations

Work is needed to evaluate behaviour and body mass index change in the National Childhood Measurement Programme more accurately and improve primary care professionals’ understanding of the National Childhood Measurement Programme feedback, update and further evaluate the Computer-Assisted Treatment of CHildren (CATCH) tool, investigate delivery of weight management interventions to young people from deprived backgrounds and those with significant psychological distress and obtain longer-term data on anti-obesity drug use and bariatric surgery outcomes in adolescence.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99840111.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 8, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Geographic variation in the use of lymphadenectomy and external-beam radiotherapy for endometrial cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of population-based data

OBJECTIVE

To quantify geographic variation in the use of lymphadenectomy and/or external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for endometrial cancer in England.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of population-based data.

SETTING

English cancer registry data, linked to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hospital episodes statistics data.

POPULATION

Twenty-two thousand four hundred and eighty-three women with endometrial cancer presenting without clinical or radiological evidence of distant metastatic spread, diagnosed in England from 2013 to 2016.

METHODS

Proportions of patients receiving lymphadenectomy and/or EBRT were compared across 19 Cancer Alliances, to identify variations in clinical practice. Two separate logistic regression models assessed the impact on variation of adjustment for tumour and patient characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Receipt of lymphadenectomy, receipt of EBRT.

RESULTS

There was substantial variation by Cancer Alliance in the adjusted proportion of women with endometrial cancer receiving lymphadenectomy (range 5% [95% CI 4-6%] to 48% [95% CI 45-52%]) and EBRT (range 10% [95% CI 7-12%] to 31% [95% CI 28-33%]), after adjusting for variation in pathological grade, age, comorbidities, deprivation, ethnic group and (EBRT only) FIGO stage. Different approaches to clinical practice were identified; (i) one Cancer Alliance had significantly higher than average lymphadenectomy and significantly lower than average EBRT use, (ii) three had high use of both lymphadenectomy and EBRT, (iii) one had low lymphadenectomy use and high EBRT use, and (iv) three had low use of both lymphadenectomy and EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy is probably used to triage for EBRT when lymphadenectomy use is high and EBRT use is low. This is probably a result of variation in local endometrial cancer management guidelines, suggesting that UK recommendations should be clarified.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

There is geographic variation in England in the use of lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy to treat endometrial cancer.