Survival analysis of carboplatin added to an anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HRD score as predictor of response-final results from GeparSixto

Background

In the neoadjuvant GeparSixto study, adding carboplatin to taxane- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we present survival data and the potential prognostic and predictive role of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized to paclitaxel plus nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®) (PM) or PM plus carboplatin (PMCb). The secondary study end points disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 47.3 months. HRD was among the exploratory analyses in GeparSixto and was successfully measured in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 193/315 (61.3%) participants with TNBC. Homologous recombination (HR) deficiency was defined as HRD score ≥42 and/or presence of tumor BRCA mutations (tmBRCA).

Results

A significantly better DFS (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.93; P = 0.022) was observed in patients with TNBC when treated with PMCb. The improvement of OS with PMCb was not statistically significant. Additional carboplatin did not improve DFS or OS in patients with HER2-positive tumors. HR deficiency was detected in 136 (70.5%) of 193 triple-negative tumors, of which 82 (60.3%) showed high HRD score without tmBRCA. HR deficiency independently predicted pCR (ypT0 ypN0) [odds ratio (OR) 2.60, 95% CI 1.26-5.37, P = 0.008]. Adding carboplatin to PM significantly increased the pCR rate from 33.9% to 63.5% in HR deficient tumors (P = 0.001), but only marginally in HR nondeficient tumors (from 20.0% to 29.6%, P = 0.540; test for interaction P = 0.327). pCR rates with carboplatin were also higher (63.2%) than without carboplatin (31.7%; OR 3.69, 1.46-9.37, P = 0.005) in patients with high HRD score but no tmBRCA. DFS rates were improved with addition of carboplatin, both in HR nondeficient (hazard ratio 0.44, 0.17-1.17, P = 0.086) and HR deficient tumors (hazard ratio 0.49, 0.23-1.04, P = 0.059).

Conclusions

The addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant PM improved DFS significantly in TNBC. Long-term survival analyses support the neoadjuvant use of carboplatin in TNBC. HR deficiency in TNBC and HRD score in non-tmBRCA TNBC are predictors of response. HRD does not predict for carboplatin benefit.

Abstract P6-18-08: Everolimus + exemestane for HR+ advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice- Final results from the non-interventional trial, BRAWO

Background: In the pivotal BOLERO-2 trial, everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE) more than doubled the median progression-free survival (PFS) vs EXE alone in hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor-receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring/progressing on/after prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). BRAWO is a German non-interventional study conducted in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2–ABC receiving EVE + EXE, according to Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), in routine clinical practice. Here we report the final PFS and safety results.

Methods: This multicenter study documented 2100 pts between October 2012 and December 2017 across 341 sites in Germany. Postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– ABC with recurrence or progression after a NSAI were included. Primary observation parameters included the evaluation of the effectiveness of EVE + EXE used in routine care for the entire pt group.

Results: In the final analysis, out of the 2100 documented pts, 2074 were included in the full analysis set. The median time since the primary diagnosis was 7.1 years and the median time from first sign of relapse (local recurrence or distant metastases) was 2.1 years. At baseline, 54.1% of pts presented with visceral metastases and 50.1% had an ECOG performance status of 0. Approximately, 63% of pts started with EVE 10 mg (median duration of exposure: 5.1 months; 95% CI, 4.6-5.4), while 34.1% started with EVE 5 mg (median duration of exposure: 4.6 months; 95% CI, 4.1-5.2).

The distribution of treatment lines was as follows: first line, 28.7% (n=595); second line, 31.9% (n=662); third line, 18.1% (n=376); fourth line, 10.7% (n=221) and, fifth line and later, 10.6% (n=220). Treatment was discontinued by 55.7% of pts (n=1170) due to progressive disease and 26% of pts (n=546) due to adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median PFS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.0). The best overall responses, based on clinical routine, were complete response, 0.8% (n=17), partial response, 7.4% (n=150), and stable disease, 41.3% (n=842). The general safety profile was consistent with the previously reported safety findings. The most common adverse events were stomatitis (any grade: 42.6%, grade 3: 3.8%, grade 4: <0.1%) and fatigue (any grade: 19.8%, grade 3: 1.5%).

Conclusions: Data from BRAWO support EVE + EXE as a suitable treatment option with a reasonable safety profile for HR+, HER2− ABC recurring or progressing on/after prior NSAIs.

Citation Format: Lüftner D, Schuetz F, Schneeweiss A, Grischke E-M, Bloch W, Decker T, Uleer C, Salat C, Förster F, Schmidt M, Mundhenke C, Tesch H, Jackisch C, Fischer T, Guderian G, Hanson S, Fasching P. Everolimus + exemestane for HR+ advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice- Final results from the non-interventional trial, BRAWO [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-08.

Abstract P2-08-01: Factors predicting relapse in early breast cancer patients with a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy – Results of a pooled analysis based on the GBG meta-database

Background

Even though patients with a pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an excellent prognosis still some of these patients will eventually relapse. A better identification of pts with an increased risk of relapse despite a pCR would be helpful to select these patients for additional post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies. Thus, the rationale of this retrospective analysis was to identify factors predicting relapse despite a pCR.

Methods

This pooled retrospective analysis based on the GBG meta-database includes the neoadjuvant trials GeparTrio, GeparQuattro, GeparQuinto, GeparSixto and GeparSepto. In these trials 2188 (27%) of 7933 pts had a pCR according to ypT0/ypTis ypN0 Definition and were included. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), secondary endpoints were distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to report hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI). The two-sided significance level was set to α=0.05. Endpoints were analysed for all pts and in subgroups defined by intrinsic subtypes. The potential risk factors intrinsic subtype (HER2 negative/hormone receptor (HR) positive, triple negative, HER2 positive/HR positive, HER2 positive/HR negative), histological tumor type (lobular vs other), grade (G1/G2 vs G3), KI67 (≤20% vs higher), initial cT and cN stadium (cT1 vs cT2 vs cT3/4; cN0 vs cN+), age (≤40 vs 41-59 vs ≥60), BMI (< 25 vs 25-29 vs ≥ 30), planned number of cycles of chemotherapy (≤6 vs > 6), menopausal status (pre- vs postmenopausal) and clinical response after 2-4 cycles (SD vs PR vs CR vs PD) were included as covariates in multivariate Cox regression models as well as study identification.

Results

From 2188 evaluable patients DFS, DDFS and OS events were observed in 290/197/130 pts respectively; the median follow-up over all studies was 59 months. In multivariate analysis including study and all potential risk factors DFS was significantly different with regard to the initial cN status (cN+ vs cN0, hazard ratio (HR) 1.70; 95% CI [1.2, 2.4], p=0.002). Of borderline significance was histological type (non-lobular vs lobular, HR 0.52 95% CI [0.3, 1.1]; p=0.076) and initial tumor stage (cT3/4 vs cT1, HR 1.61 95% CI [1.0, 2.7]; p=0.064). In terms of DDFS significant differences were seen for the initial cN status (cN+ vs cN0, HR 2.34; 95% CI [1.5, 3.6], p<0.001) and initial tumor stage (cT3/4 vs cT1, HR 1.83 95% CI [1.0, 3.3]; p=0.044); histological type was again close to significance (non-lobular vs lobular, HR 0.46 95% CI [0.2, 1.1]; p=0.067). Multivariate analysis showed significantly worse OS with initial cT3/4 tumors (cT3/4 vs cT1, HR 2.48 95%CI [1.1, 5.7]; p=0.030), and the lobular type (non-lobular vs lobular, HR 0.35 95% CI [0.1, 0.9]; p=0.026) and a trend for worse OS in pts with cN+ (cN+ vs cN0, HR 1.67 95% CI [1.0, 2.9]; p=0.067).

Conclusions

Initial tumor load before start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tumor stage and nodal status) and lobular subtype were predictors of long term outcome after a pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Intrinsic subtype, KI67, grade and planned number of cycles were not predictive for a relapse.

Citation Format: Huober J, Schneeweiss A, Blohmer J-U, Denkert C, Tesch H, Hanusch CA, Salat C, Rhiem K, Rezai M, Solbach C, Fasching PA, Jackisch C, Mehta K, Nekljudova V, Seither F, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M. Factors predicting relapse in early breast cancer patients with a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy – Results of a pooled analysis based on the GBG meta-database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-01.

Abstract P1-09-02: Homologous repair deficiency (HRD) as measure to predict the effect of carboplatin on survival in the neoadjuvant phase II trial GeparSixto in triple-negative early breast cancer

Introduction

Addition of carboplatin to anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown to improve pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) rates in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in two large phase II studies (GeparSixto: von Minckwitz et al, Lancet Oncol 2014, CALGB 40603: Sikov WM, J Clin Oncol 2015). Participants of the GeparSixto study showed an improvement of pCR rate from 36.9 to 53.2% (p=0.005) and DFS by absolute 9% (HR 0.56 95% CI 0.33-0.96] p=0.035) with the addition of carboplatin in the TNBC subgroup. No effect was observed in the HER2-positive subgroup. We here report results on homologous repair deficiency (HRD) status in relation to pCR and DFS in the TNBC subgroup.

Patients and Methods

In the GeparSixto trial (NCT01426880), patients were treated for 18 weeks with paclitaxel 80mg/m2 q1w and non-pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) 20mg/m2 q1w. Patients with TNBC (N=315) received concurrently bevacizumab 15mg/kg i.v. q2w until surgery. All patients were randomized 1:1 to receive concurrently carboplatin AUC 1.5-2 q1w vs no carboplatin. Carboplatin dose was reduced from AUC 2.0 to 1.5 by an amendment after 330 patients. Primary objective is pCR rate (ypT0 ypN0). Event free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were secondary objectives. HR Deficiency status was assessed on FFPE material from pretherapeutic core biopsies. HR Deficiency was defined as either HRD score high or a BRCA mutation.

Results

HRD status was measurable in 193 of 315 TNBC patients. 101 patients of them were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin and 92 to no additional carboplatin. After median follow-up of 34.3 months 43 event free survival (EFS) events have been reported.

HR deficiency was detected in 136 (70.5%) tumors of which 79 (58.1%) showed high HRD score with intact tBRCA. HR deficiency independently predicted pCR (ypT0is ypN0) (odds ratio (OR) 2.506, CI 1.243-5.051, p=0.009). Adding carboplatin to PM significantly increased the pCR rate from 36.6% to 63.2% in HR deficient tumors with intact tBRCA (p=0.018), only marginally from 61.9% to 72.7% in BRCA mutated tumors (p=0.406), and moderately from 20.0% to 40.7% in HR non-deficient tumors (p=0.086). In general, patients with HRD deficient tumors had a better ESF than non HRD deficient ones (HR 1.805 (0.985-3.309); p=0.0526). Patients with high HRD score had an insignificant trend towards an improved EFS compared to those with low HRD score (HR 1.546 (0.764-3.127) p=0.2223). HRD deficiency did not predict carboplatin effect in patients without BRCA mutation (HR 0.8617). In multivariable analysis, only therapy, clinical nodal status before treatment, and lymphocyte predominant breast cancer were significant prognostic on EFS.

Conclusion

Within the GeparSixto study HR deficiency (either HRD score high or BRCA mutation) was associated with a higher pCR in general and an improved EFS. The effect of carboplatin could not be predicted by HR deficiency in this relatively small study. However, the results will help to understand the role of HR deficiency and the value of the HRD score in TNBC especially in patients without BRCA mutation.

Citation Format: von Minckwitz G, Timms K, Untch M, Elkin EP, Hahnen E, Fasching PA, Schneeweiss A, Salat CT, Rezai M, Blohmer J-U, Zahm D-M, Jackisch C, Gerber B, Klare P, Kümmel S, Paepke S, Schmutzler R, Chau S, Reid J, Hartman A-R, Nekljudova V, Weber KE, Loibl S. Homologous repair deficiency (HRD) as measure to predict the effect of carboplatin on survival in the neoadjuvant phase II trial GeparSixto in triple-negative early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-02.

Abstract P4-13-07: Impact of physical activity/exercise on adverse events and quality of life during treatment with everolimus and exemestane for ER+ women - Results of the 3rd interim analysis of BRAWO

Introduction

BRAWO is a non-interventional study collecting data of 3000 breast cancer patients treated with everolimus and exemestane (advanced or metastatic, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer). We introduce results of the 3rd preplanned interim analysis with data cut-off 08/01/ 2015, including 1300 patients. Since physical activity/exercise was reported to influence side effects as well as quality of life (QoL) of various cancer types and therapies, this analysis focuses on the impact of the physical activity/exercise history, development on adverse effects (AE) of the medical treatment and QoL.

Methods

Patients were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS-KAS) measuring their present-, past ten year- and lifetime physical activity/exercise level. To differentiate between activity/exercise levels, VAS were divided in three equal components (inactive, somewhat active, very active). Questionnaires and information about AE (e. g. stomatitis, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, etc.) were collected before starting the medical treatment and were repeated each three months. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the impact of baseline physical activity/exercise on AE at any time point of the therapy. ANOVA models were used to calculate the impact of the baseline activity/exercise level on QoL at the last completed data set of each patient.

Results

Median age of patients was 66 years, median weight was 70 kg, median BMI was 25.9, median time since primary diagnosis was 6.2 years, and 54.4% had visceral metastases at baseline. The median PFS for the first 1300 patients was 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.5-8.0). Patients who reported to be very active (exercise) at the week prior to baseline (4.4%) showed significant lower numbers of AE compared to patients who indicate to be somewhat (14.8%) or inactive (80.8%). In contrast to the exercise level, physical activity in everyday life did not affect the AE incidence. Neither lifetime nor past ten year activity/exercise level is associated with the occurrence of AE. Regarding QoL, very active as well as somewhat active women (measured at baseline for almost each time period) showed significant higher QoL values compared to inactive women during the last assessment before death/progress.

Conclusion

Exercise prior to medical treatment with Everolimus and Exemestane may impact AE during therapy. Since physical activity did not show such a relation, this analysis highlights the importance of specific guidelines for preventive/rehabilitative exercise programs. More knowledge about dose-response relationships is needed. Furthermore a livelong healthy, "active" lifestyle may increase QoL, even in patients with advanced and terminal breast cancer disease.

Citation Format: Bloch W, Baumann F, Zimmer P, Grischke E-M, Fasching PA, Decker T, Uleer C, Schneeweiss A, Salat C, Wimberger P, Mundhenke C, Förster F, Kluth-Pepper B, Schubert J, Tesch H, Schütz F, Lüftner D, Jackisch C. Impact of physical activity/exercise on adverse events and quality of life during treatment with everolimus and exemestane for ER+ women - Results of the 3rd interim analysis of BRAWO. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-07.

Abstract P4-13-06: Results of the 3rd interim analysis of the non-interventional trial BRAWO – Subanalysis of patients <70 years and ≥ 70 years

Background

BRAWO is a German non-interventional study of 3000 patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic, hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer treated with everolimus and exemestane (EVE+EXE). The pivotal BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated that adding EVE to EXE improved PFS over EXE and was generally well tolerated in elderly patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer (>65 years as well as >70 years). Here we describe data of elderly patients treated with EVE+EXE in daily clinical routine.

Methods

We report data of the 3rd preplanned interim analysis (IA) of the first 1300 pts documented in BRAWO. Patient and disease characteristics in elderly patients (≥ 70 years, n=485) and patients <70 years (n=813) are described. Furthermore, safety and efficacy data for both subgroups are described.

Results

At time of data cut-off, 71% pts had discontinued the study, 29% were still ongoing. Patient and disease characteristics were comparable in both groups except for: median age (60y (range: 20-69y) vs. 75y (range 70-93y)), median time since 1st diagnosis (6.4y <70y vs. 8.8y ≥70 y), ECOG performance status 0 (56.6% <70y vs. 37.0% ≥70 y), and younger pts seemed to have less comorbidities (charlson comorbidity index (CCI)=0: 80.9% vs. 67.4%). The distribution of patients by therapy line was similar as well as tumor grading, hormone receptor status, Ki67-status and metastasis localization.

More patients in the older group received fulvestrant (20.6% vs. 16.2%), in the younger group more patients received chemotherapy (20.3% vs. 14.2%) as last antineoplastic therapy. In general, more patients in the older subgroup did not receive any chemotherapy as pretreatment (53.6% vs 40.2%).

More patients in the subgroup ≥70y received 5mg EVE as starting dose (30.3% vs. 20.8%) and had 5mg as end dose (37.9% vs. 26.9%). Median PFS was 7.1 months in the overall population, 7.0 months (6.5, 8.0; 95%CI) for pts <70y and 7.3 months (6.3, 8.6; 95%CI) for pts ≥70y. Kaplan Meier estimates for median treatment duration were longer for younger pts (167.0 days (155.0, 191.0; 95%CI vs. 128.0 days (112.0, 152.0; 95%CI)). Incidence and severity of stomatitis were comparable across subgroups (Table 1). Quality of life analysis revealed no significant differences between older and younger pts.

Table 1: Incidence and severity of stomatitis

Patient Characteristics< 70 years (n=813)≥ 70 years (n=485)Stomatitis  Number of patients with at least one Stomatitis Event (based on stomatitis questionnaires)339 (41.7%)200 (41.2%)Grade 1181 (22.3%)95 (19.6%)Grade 2119 (14.6%)79 (16.3%)Grade 319 (2.3%)11 (2.3%)unknown20 (2.5%)15 (3.1%)Number of Stomatitis Events431 (100.0%)252 (100%)Grade 1237 (55.0%)125 (49.6%)Grade 2136 (31.6%)87 (34.5%)Grade 319 (4.4%)13 (5.2%)

Discussion

The data described here show that EVE+EXE treatment is effective and safe for elderly patients in daily clinical routine. This is consistent with data from an exploratory analysis of the pivotal BOLERO-2 trial, where the same differences in baseline characteristics were observed for elderly pts compared to younger pts as in BRAWO. Efficacy was also comparable to elderly pts in BOLERO-2 (mPFS 6.8 months for EVE+EXE in pts ≥70 years).

Citation Format: Tesch H, Grischke E-M, Fasching PA, Decker T, Uleer C, Schneeweiss A, Salat C, Wimberger P, Mundhenke C, Förster F, Kluth-Pepper B, Schubert J, Bloch W, Jackisch C, Schütz F, Lüftner D. Results of the 3rd interim analysis of the non-interventional trial BRAWO – Subanalysis of patients <70 years and ≥ 70 years. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-06.

Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto)†

BACKGROUND

The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Abstract P3-13-01: Primary efficacy endpoint analysis of the CARIN trial: Capecitabine (Cap) and bevacizumab (Bev) with or without vinorelbine (Vin) in first line metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Background:

In RIBBON-1, the combination of Bev with Cap as 1st-line therapy for MBC significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with Cap alone, with limited impact on tolerability. Vin and Cap are active agents with few overlapping toxicities. The combination of both cytotoxic drugs in phase I/II trials showed good tolerability and promising clinical activity. The CARIN trial aims to further improve efficacy by adding Vin to Cap/Bev to establish a less toxic alternative to taxane-based 1st line therapy.

Patients and Methods:

CARIN is a multicenter randomized study comparing the efficacy of Cap plus Bev versus the same regimen combined with Vin. From 04/2009 until 10/2012 598 pts in 61 participating centers were randomized (1:1) to receive Cap 1000 mg/m2 bid days 1–14 + Bev 15 mg/kg q3w (Arm A) or Cap/Bev combined with Vin 25 mg/m2 days 1+8 (Arm B). Randomization was stratified by prior therapy with anthracycline and/or taxane (yes/no) and hormone receptor status (ER/PR +/-). Treatment was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key eligibility criteria included Her-2 negative metastatic or locally recurrent disease, no prior palliative chemotherapy for MBC, ECOG ≤2, and absence of brain metastases. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, and safety & tolerability. Baseline demographics, prior therapy and disease characteristics were well balanced. 21.5% of pts had triple negative BC, 10.6% had bone metastases only. Progression free survival data for the two treatment arms will be compared using a log-rank test. The influence of pretreatment, hormone receptor status and predictive variables on progression free survival will be analyzed within a cox regression model.

Results:

Data Cleaning and analysis will be complete by October 2013 and results for the primary endpoint PFS and secondary endpoints will be presented at the meeting.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-01.

Abstract P5-18-21: A Phase II randomized trial of lapatinib with either vinorelbine or capecitabine as first- and second-line therapy for ErbB2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Background: Lapatinib (L), a dual kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB2, is effective in the treatment of ErbB2+ MBC in combination with capecitabine (C) following progression after trastuzumab, anthracyclines, and taxanes. Vinorelbine (V) is an important chemotherapy option in MBC, and multiple Phase II trials have been conducted in combination with trastuzumab. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study (LAP112620, VITAL) evaluated the efficacy and safety of L with either V or C in women with ErbB2+ MBC.

Methods: Patients with MBC who had received ≤1 chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting were randomized 2:1 to either L 1250 mg orally once daily (QD) continuously plus V 20 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 and 8, every third week, or L 1250 mg orally QD continuously plus C 2000 mg/m2/day orally in 2 doses 12 hours apart on Days 1–14 every third week. Patients were stratified by prior receipt of therapy for MBC (Y/N) and site of metastatic disease (visceral/soft tissue or bone-only). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed once all subjects had been followed for a minimum of 6 months or had otherwise progressed, died or withdrawn, if sooner. The primary focus was to evaluate PFS in the L plus V arm with a descriptive intent only. Other endpoints included overall response rate, overall survival, and safety. Patients progressing on one treatment arm were given the option of crossing over to the other arm.

Results: 112 patients were randomized. The results and conclusions sections will be updated once the primary analysis has been completed in September 2012.

ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT01013740

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-21.

Gemcitabine + cisplatin (GEM+CIS) in combination with regional hyperthermia (RHT) in second-line therapy of gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer

14073

Background: Our completed phase III trial comparing GEM + CIS vs. GEM alone showed good efficacy for the combination arm in 1st-line therapy (ASCO abstr. No. 1003, 2003). Based on the rationale of chemosensitization of CIS by RHT we are performing a prospective phase II study with GEM + CIS combined with RHT. Methods: Until 8/2005 12 pts with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who failed GEM-based 1st-line-therapy were enrolled in this study. One cycle consisted of GEM (1000mg/m2) on d1 followed by CIS (25mg/m2) on d2 and d4 combined with RHT (BSD system). A total of 2 blocks each of 4 cycles were given biweekly. The main endpoints were time to second progression (TTP2) and 1-year event free survival (1-yr-EFS). TTP2 and EFS were defined as time from start of 2nd-line therapy until progression of disease or death. Response (RECIST) was evaluated after 4 and 8 cycles of therapy. Results: Pt characteristics: median age 60; M:F=8:4. Median time to first progression (TTP1) was 6 months (95% CI:2–7). 8/12 pts received all 8 cycles. No toxic death and no grade 4 toxicity occurred. In 12/2005 10/12 pts were evaluable for this study. Control of disease (1CR, 2MR, 4NC) and progression (3PD) occurred in 70% and 30% respectively. The median TTP2 is 8 months (95% CI: 2–13) and the 1-yr-EFS is 32% (95% CI:3–61). 7 pts are alive at 12/2005. Conclusions: Our ongoing study (EudraCT-No 2005–003855–11) using RHT combined with GEM + CIS shows promising antitumor activity with a very encouraging TTP2 and median 1-yr-EFS in the 2nd-line treatment of GEM-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer.

[Table: see text]