1
|
Gillessen S, Armstrong A, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono JS, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ekeke ON, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Higano C, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Skoneczna I, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Spratt DE, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Tombal B, Türkeri L, Uemura H, Uemura H, van Oort I, Yamoah K, Ye D, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021. Eur Urol 2022; 82:115-141. [PMID: 35450732 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the voting results from APCCC 2021. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hahn A, Tidwell R, Surasi D, Msaouel P, Efstathiou E, Zurita-Saavedra A, Tu SM, McQuade J, Fogelman D, Starbuck M, Subudhi S, Corn P, Pilie P, Aparicio A, Logothetis C. 669P Body composition and clinical outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
3
|
Halabi S, Dutta S, Tangen CM, Rosenthal M, Petrylak DP, Thompson IM, Chi KN, De Bono JS, Araujo JC, Logothetis C, Eisenberger MA, Quinn DI, Fizazi K, Morris MJ, Higano CS, Tannock IF, Small EJ, Kelly WK. Clinical outcomes in men of diverse ethnic backgrounds with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:930-941. [PMID: 32289380 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have shown previously in multivariable analysis that black men had 19% lower risk of death than white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with a docetaxel and prednisone (DP)-based regimen. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical PFS, ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline and objective response rate (ORR) in white, black and Asian men with mCRPC treated with a DP-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data from 8820 mCRPC men randomized on nine phase III trials to a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race used in the analysis was based on self-report. End points were PFS, biochemical PSA, ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline and ORR. The proportional hazards and the logistic regression models were employed to assess the prognostic importance of race in predicting outcomes adjusting for established prognostic factors. RESULTS Of 8820 patients, 7528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 were Asian (5%) and 368 (4%) had race unspecified. Median PFS were 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-8.5], 8.2 (95% CI 7.4-8.8) and 8.3 (95% CI 7.6-8.8) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively. Median PSA PFS were 9.9 (95% CI 9.7-10.4), 8.5 (95% CI 8.0-10.3) and 11.1 (95% CI 9.9-12.5) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We observed no differences in clinical outcomes by race and ethnic groups in men with mCRPC enrolled on these phase III clinical trials with DP.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Chi KN, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono J, Drake CG, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heidenreich A, Heinrich D, Higano CTS, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Kanesvaran R, Kantoff P, Khauli RB, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Reiter RE, Roach M, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tombal B, Türkeri L, van Oort I, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. Eur Urol 2020; 77:508-547. [PMID: 32001144 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 259] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the results from the APCCC 2019. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naïve prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sternberg C, Tombal B, Miller K, Saad F, Sartor O, Sade J, Logothetis C, Bellmunt J, Dizdarevic S, Harshman L, Logue J, Baldari S, Richardson T, Bottomley D, Schostak M, Bayh I, Kalinovsky J, Higano C. Use of bone health agents (BHAs) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) after abiraterone (Abi): An interim review of REASSURE. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy284.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
6
|
Sakellakis M, Ramachandran S, Zhang X, Logothetis C, Titus M. PO-017 Androgen deprivation and oxidative phosporylation inhibition pose synergistic antitumor effects in subsets of prostate tumours in vitro. ESMO Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-eacr25.552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
7
|
Sakellakis M, Ramachandran S, Efstathiou E, Mao X, Hoang A, Navone N, Logothetis C, Titus M. PO-259 Identification of a clinically meaningful site-specific steroid roadmap in prostate cancer. ESMO Open 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-eacr25.774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
8
|
Gillessen S, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bossi A, Bristow R, Carver B, Castellano D, Chung BH, Clarke N, Daugaard G, Davis ID, de Bono J, Borges Dos Reis R, Drake CG, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng F, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heidenreich A, Higano CS, James N, Kantoff P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Kramer G, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Murthy V, Oh W, Ost P, Padhani AR, Parker C, Pritchard CC, Roach M, Rubin MA, Ryan C, Saad F, Sartor O, Scher H, Sella A, Shore N, Smith M, Soule H, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Tannock I, Tombal B, Valdagni R, Wiegel T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017. Eur Urol 2018; 73:178-211. [PMID: 28655541 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 368] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In advanced prostate cancer (APC), successful drug development as well as advances in imaging and molecular characterisation have resulted in multiple areas where there is lack of evidence or low level of evidence. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017 addressed some of these topics. OBJECTIVE To present the report of APCCC 2017. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Ten important areas of controversy in APC management were identified: high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer; "oligometastatic" prostate cancer; castration-naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancer; the role of imaging in APC; osteoclast-targeted therapy; molecular characterisation of blood and tissue; genetic counselling/testing; side effects of systemic treatment(s); global access to prostate cancer drugs. A panel of 60 international prostate cancer experts developed the program and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 150 predefined questions, which have been developed following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Voting is based on panellist opinion, and thus is not based on a standard literature review or meta-analysis. The outcomes of the voting had varying degrees of support, as reflected in the wording of this article, as well as in the detailed voting results recorded in Supplementary data. CONCLUSIONS The presented expert voting results can be used for support in areas of management of men with APC where there is no high-level evidence, but individualised treatment decisions should as always be based on all of the data available, including disease extent and location, prior therapies regardless of type, host factors including comorbidities, as well as patient preferences, current and emerging evidence, and logistical and economic constraints. Inclusion of men with APC in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2017 again identified important areas in need of trials specifically designed to address them. PATIENT SUMMARY The second Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017 did provide a forum for discussion and debates on current treatment options for men with advanced prostate cancer. The aim of the conference is to bring the expertise of world experts to care givers around the world who see less patients with prostate cancer. The conference concluded with a discussion and voting of the expert panel on predefined consensus questions, targeting areas of primary clinical relevance. The results of these expert opinion votes are embedded in the clinical context of current treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer and provide a practical guide to clinicians to assist in the discussions with men with prostate cancer as part of a shared and multidisciplinary decision-making process.
Collapse
|
9
|
Loriot Y, Pagliaro L, Fléchon A, Mardiak J, Geoffrois L, Kerbrat P, Chevreau C, Delva R, Rolland F, Theodore C, Roubaud G, Gravis G, Eymard J, Malhaire J, Linassier C, Habibian M, Martin A, Journeau F, Reckova M, Logothetis C, Laplanche A, Le Teuff G, Culine S, Fizazi K. Patterns of relapse in poor-prognosis germ-cell tumours in the GETUG 13 trial: Implications for assessment of brain metastases. Eur J Cancer 2017; 87:140-146. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
10
|
Efstathiou E, Tsikkinis A, Wen S, Tapia ELN, Hoang A, Aparicio A, Tu SM, Rangel G, Troncoso P, Corn P, Araujo J, Logothetis C. Abiraterone acetate (AA) followed by randomization to dasatinib (D) or sunitinib malate (S) in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw372.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Efstathiou E, Li Ning Tapia E, Aparicio A, Tu S, Wen S, Hoang A, Pagliaro L, Harmon C, Troncoso P, Araujo J, Logothetis C. Maximal Androgen Depletion with Abiraterone Acetate (Aa) Followed By Randomization of Maximal Androgen Ablation with Molecular Targeted Therapies Dasatinib or Sunitinib Malate in Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (Mcrpc). Report on Candidate Predictive Androgen Signaling Signature. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu438.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Fizazi K, Drake C, Kwon E, Bossi A, van den Eertwegh A, Scher H, Beer T, McHenry M, Liu D, Gerritsen W, Logothetis C. Updated Overall Survival (Os) from the Phase 3 Trial, Ca184-043: Ipilimumab (Ipi) Vs Placebo (Pbo) in Patients with Post-Docetaxel Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (Mcrpc). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu336.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
13
|
Arora VK, Schenkein E, Murali R, Subudhi SK, Wongvipat J, Balbas MD, Shah N, Cai L, Efstathiou E, Logothetis C, Zheng D, Sawyers CL. Glucocorticoid receptor confers resistance to antiandrogens by bypassing androgen receptor blockade. Cell 2014; 155:1309-22. [PMID: 24315100 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 723] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2012] [Revised: 08/16/2013] [Accepted: 11/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of advanced prostate cancer has been transformed by novel antiandrogen therapies such as enzalutamide. Here, we identify induction of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression as a common feature of drug-resistant tumors in a credentialed preclinical model, a finding also confirmed in patient samples. GR substituted for the androgen receptor (AR) to activate a similar but distinguishable set of target genes and was necessary for maintenance of the resistant phenotype. The GR agonist dexamethasone was sufficient to confer enzalutamide resistance, whereas a GR antagonist restored sensitivity. Acute AR inhibition resulted in GR upregulation in a subset of prostate cancer cells due to relief of AR-mediated feedback repression of GR expression. These findings establish a mechanism of escape from AR blockade through expansion of cells primed to drive AR target genes via an alternative nuclear receptor upon drug exposure.
Collapse
|
14
|
Som A, Tu SM, Liu J, Wang X, Qiao W, Logothetis C, Corn PG. Response in bone turnover markers during therapy predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: analysis of three clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:1547-53. [PMID: 23033003 PMCID: PMC3493771 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2012] [Revised: 08/24/2012] [Accepted: 08/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The bone-forming metastases of prostate cancer result from complex stromal-epithelial interactions within the tumour microenvironment. Autocrine-paracrine signalling pathways between prostate cancer epithelial cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts stimulate aberrant bone remodelling, and the activity of these three cell populations can be quantitatively measured using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and urine N-telopeptide (uNTx), respectively. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that serial measurements of BAP and uNTx during therapy would facilitate monitoring of disease activity and predict the overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer receiving therapy. METHODS Radionuclide bone scan, PSA, BAP, and uNTx data were retrospectively analysed from three clinical trials in patients with metastatic prostate cancer conducted at our institution. Qualitative changes in bone scans and quantitative changes in PSA, BAP, and uNTx concentrations during therapy were correlated with OS. RESULTS Baseline levels of BAP, but not PSA, were prognostic for OS in both androgen-dependent and castrate-resistant disease. A reduction in PSA, BAP, uNTx, or BAP/uNTx on therapy was predictive of improved OS in both patient groups. Conversely, an increase in PSA, or BAP on therapy was predictive of worse OS in both patient groups. Baseline number of lesions and response on bone scan during therapy were neither prognostic nor predictive of OS in either patient group. CONCLUSION These observations support the concept that serial measurements of bone turnover metabolites during therapy function as clinically informative predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced prostate cancer and skeletal metastases. PSA measurements and bone scans remain essential to monitor the overall disease activity and determine the anatomic distribution of skeletal metastases.
Collapse
|
15
|
Scher HI, Heller G, Molina A, Kheoh TS, Attard G, Moreira J, Sandhu SK, Parker C, Logothetis C, McCormack RT, Fizazi K, Anand A, Danila DC, Fleisher M, Olmos D, Haqq CM, De Bono JS. Evaluation of circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as an efficacy response biomarker of overall survival (OS) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Planned final analysis (FA) of COU-AA-301, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus low-dose prednisone (P) post docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.18_suppl.lba4517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA4517 Background: A preplanned interim analysis of COU-AA-301 showed that AA, a selective androgen biosynthesis (CYP17) inhibitor, significantly improves OS in mCRPC. This is the first phase III study to prospectively assess CTC as a surrogate biomarker as part of a regulatory qualification process, here using updated OS data. Methods: 1,195 patients (pts) with mCRPC post docetaxel were randomized 2:1 to AA (1 g QD) + P (5 mg BID) (n = 797) or placebo + P (n = 398). CTCs (screening and baseline [BL]; post BL at weeks 4, 8 and 12) were enumerated (cells/7.5 mL) at MSKCC and The ICR using CellSearch and analyzed with other prognostic covariates as dichotomous and continuous variables using updated OS data at 775 events (prior to crossover from placebo to AA). CTC (as part of a biomarker panel - LDH, PSA, Hg, AlkPhos) was examined as a surrogate for OS. Multivariate (Cox model) analyses were conducted. Results: At median follow up (FU) of 20.2 mo, the difference in median OS between the 2 groups improved from 3.9 to 4.6 mo (AA 15.8 mo vs placebo 11.2 mo; HR = 0.74; p < .0001). CTC counts were evaluated in 972 pts at screening and BL, 838 at 4 wks, 783 at 8 wks and 723 pts at 12 wks. High concordance between screening and BL values was observed (r = 0.83). CTC conversion using standard definition for unfavorable (CTC ≥ 5) and favorable (CTC < 5) counts was predictive of OS as early as 4 wks after treatment and its inclusion significantly reduced the treatment effect at all post-treatment time points (HR: from 0.74 to 0.97). A reduced model incorporating CTCs and LDH was developed. Conclusions: The magnitude of the treatment effect of AA on OS increased with longer FU. Using standard definition of CTC conversion, the biomarker panel demonstrated a level of surrogacy for OS by correlating well with survival and in a model-adjusted analysis dramatically attenuating the treatment effect. BL CTCs and CTC conversion, along with LDH, were key predictors of OS. Future trials will further evaluate the CTC-based surrogate developed from COU-AA-301.
Collapse
|
16
|
Pagliaro LC, Zurita AJ, Araujo JC, Ward JF, Davis JW, Pettaway CA, Tu S, Kim J, Dieringer P, Logothetis C, Pisters LL. Presurgical docetaxel (Doc) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in lymph node-positive prostate cancer (PCa). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
17
|
Dayyani F, Parikh N, Song JH, Araujo JC, Carboni JM, Gottardis MM, Trudel GC, Logothetis C, Gallick GE. Antitumor effects of dual inhibition of the Src and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathways in prostate cancer (PCa). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e15004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
18
|
Bilen MA, Liu D, Mathew P, Pagliaro LC, Logothetis C, Araujo JC, Aparicio A, Corn PG, Hajdenberg J, Dakhil SR, Tu S. A randomized phase II study of bone-targeted therapy in advanced androgen-dependent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
19
|
Scher HI, Heller G, Molina A, Kheoh TS, Attard G, Moreira J, Sandhu SK, Parker C, Logothetis C, McCormack RT, Fizazi K, Anand A, Danila DC, Fleisher M, Olmos D, Haqq CM, De Bono JS. Evaluation of circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration as an efficacy response biomarker of overall survival (OS) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Planned final analysis (FA) of COU-AA-301, a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus low-dose prednisone (P) post docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.lba4517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
Aparicio A, Harzstark AL, Lin E, Corn PG, Araujo JC, Tu S, Pagliaro LC, Millikan RE, Arap W, Kim J, Ryan CJ, Zurita AJ, Tannir NM, Lin AM, Small EJ, Mathew P, Jones DM, Troncoso P, Thall PF, Logothetis C. Characterization of the anaplastic prostate carcinomas: A prospective two-stage phase II trial of frontline carboplatin and docetaxel (CD) and salvage etoposide and cisplatin (EP). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
21
|
Logothetis C, De Bono JS, Molina A, Basch EM, Fizazi K, North SA, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Goodman OB, Mainwaring PN, Sternberg CN, Gagnon DD, Dhawan R, Rothman M, Hao Y, Liu CS, Kheoh TS, Scher HI, Haqq CM. Effect of abiraterone acetate (AA) on pain control and skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post docetaxel (D): Results from the COU-AA-301 phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Efstathiou E, Titus MA, Tsavachidou D, Hoang A, Karlou M, Wen S, Troncoso P, Ashe R, Berman CJ, Mohler J, Logothetis C. MDV3100 effects on androgen receptor (AR) signaling and bone marrow testosterone concentration modulation: Apreliminary report. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Beer TM, Logothetis C, Sharma P, Gerritsen WR, Ezzeddine R, Fairchild JP, Gagnier P, Chin KM, Cuillerot J. Randomized, double-blind, phase III trial to compare the efficacy of ipilimumab (Ipi) versus placebo in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients (pts) with metastatic chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
24
|
Scher HI, Logothetis C, Molina A, Goodman OB, Sternberg CN, Chi KN, Kheoh TS, Haqq CM, Fizazi K, De Bono JS. Improved survival outcomes in clinically relevant patient subgroups from COU-AA-301, a phase III study of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4 Background: AA is a selective androgen biosynthesis inhibitor that blocks the action of CYP17. Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that AA potently inhibits persistent androgen synthesis from adrenal and intratumoral sources, thus suppressing an important growth stimulus for mCRPC. Methods: COU-AA-301 ( NCT00638690 ) is an international, randomized, double blind study of AA (1,000 mg + P 5 mg po BID) vs placebo + P administered to men with mCRPC progressing after docetaxel-based chemo. OS is the primary endpoint. Patients treated with previous ketoconazole or > 2 prior chemo regimens were excluded. Results: Data are drawn from a planned, stratified interim analysis, unblinded in August 2010, based on significant OS improvement in the AA + P treatment group compared to the placebo + P group [median OS 14.8 vs.10.9 months; HR = 0.646 (0.54-0.77), P < 0.0001]. A subgroup analysis for OS is presented in the table. Mineralocorticoid- related AEs were more common in the AA arm vs placebo: fluid retention 30.5% vs 22.3%, hypokalemia 17.1% vs 8.4%; but grade 3/4 hypokalemia (3.8% vs 0.8%), and grade 3/4 hypertension (1.3% vs 0.3%) were infrequent. LFT abnormalities were observed in 10.4% AA vs 8.1% placebo; and cardiac disorders were observed in 13.3% AA vs 10.4% placebo. Conclusions: AA significantly prolongs OS in patients with mCRPC who have progressed after docetaxel-based chemo. AA's favorable treatment effect on OS, observed across multiple patient subgroups (HR range 0.59 – 0.74 vs placebo + P), was consistent with the survival benefit for the overall study population. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
|
25
|
Zurita AJ, Ward JF, Araujo JC, Pettaway CA, Dieringer P, Wang X, Troncoso P, Logothetis C. Neoadjuvant trial of sunitinib malate and androgen ablation (ADT) in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) at high risk for recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
143 Background: Presurgical ADT does not improve long-term outcomes in patients (pts) with high-risk localized PCa. Since the VEGF and PDGF signaling pathways have been implicated in PCa progression, and ADT results in endothelial cell apoptosis in the prostate by a VEGF-mediated mechanism, we hypothesized that combined treatment with sunitinib malate (SU), an oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases of VEGFR and PDGFR, might improve the efficacy of ADT in this pt population. Methods: Pts with no radiological evidence of metastases and either PCa ≥ clinical (c)T3 disease or Gleason grade 8-10 or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL or cT2b-c and Gleason 7 and PSA ≥10 ng/mL (AJCC, 1992), received i.m. leuprolide and oral SU for three 30-day cycles followed by surgery. SU was administered continuously at 37.5 mg daily (25 mg daily in the initial 6 pts). The primary endpoint of this phase II trial was rate of pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included safety and time to progression (TTP). Unresectable pelvic nodal disease, confirmed post-operative PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, or administration of post-operative radiation or ADT, defined treatment failure. Results: Forty-four pts completed accrual, with a median age of 58 years (range 47-72); 34 Caucasian, 5 African-American, 4 Hispanic, and 1 Indian. High-risk criteria included cT3 (24/44), Gleason 8-10 (30/44), PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (16/44). Two men were ineligible/declined therapy and one postponed surgery. No grade 4 toxicities or related discontinuations were observed. Thirty-five pts completed 3 months on 37.5 mg daily SU plus ADT and surgery with no unexpected complications. Of these, 2 pts experienced a pCR. Twenty (57%) pts have failed treatment or died, with a median TTP 27 months (95% CI: 12 – not estimable). The median follow-up of the remaining event-free pts is 35 months (range 23-41). Conclusions: The 3-months preoperative combination of SU and ADT is safe and well tolerated in pts with high-risk primary PCa. We observed 2 complete remissions in 35 patients. Ongoing characterization of molecular changes in the epithelial and stromal compartments will help understand the mechanisms of SU activity in PCa. [Table: see text]
Collapse
|