1
|
Sanders A, Lim R, Jones D, Vosburg RW. Artificial intelligence large language model scores highly on focused practice designation in metabolic and bariatric surgery board practice questions. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11267-y. [PMID: 39317906 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11267-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence models such as ChatGPT (Open AI) have performed well on the exams of various medical and surgical fields. It is not yet known how ChatGPT performs on similar metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) questions. OBJECTIVE Assess the performance of ChatGPT on Focused Practice Designation in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery board-style questions. SETTING United States. METHODS Questions obtained from the largest commercially available bank of FPD-MBS practice questions were entered into ChatGPT-4, as is, without prior training. We assessed the overall percentage correct as well as the percentage correct within each of the five American Board of Surgery (ABS) question categories. One-way ANOVA was used to determine if the frequency of correct answers differed between categories. RESULTS Out of 255 questions, ChatGPT-4 correctly answered 189 (74.1%). Between the five question categories there was no difference between the frequency of correct answers (p = 0.22). It did not matter if questions were entered individually or in groups of up to 10. CONCLUSION Without prior training, ChatGPT-4 scored highly when evaluated on the largest practice question bank for the FPD-MBS exam.
Collapse
|
2
|
Morey J, Winters R, Jones D. Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters. Ann Emerg Med 2024:S0196-0644(24)00405-0. [PMID: 39320279 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict billing code levels for emergency department (ED) encounters. METHODS We accessed ED encounters from our health system from January to September 2023. We developed an ensemble model using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to predict billing codes from clinical notes combined with clinical characteristics and orders. Explainable AI techniques were used to help determine the important model features. The main endpoint was to predict evaluation and management professional billing codes (levels 2 to 5 [Current Procedural Terminology codes 99282 to 99285] and critical care). Secondary endpoints included predicting professional billing codes at different decision boundary thresholds and generalizability of the model at other EDs. RESULTS There were 321,893 adult ED encounters coded at levels 2 (<1%), 3 (5%), 4 (38%), 5 (51%), and critical care (5%). Model performance for professional billing code levels of 4 and 5 yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.94 and 0.95, accuracy values of 0.80 and 0.92, and F1-scores of 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. At a 95% decision boundary threshold, level 5 predicted charts had a precision/positive predictive value of 0.99 and recall/sensitivity of 0.57. The most important features using Shapley Additive Explanations values were critical care note, number of orders, discharge disposition, cardiology, and psychiatry. CONCLUSION Currently available AI models accurately predict billing code levels for ED encounters based on clinical notes, clinical characteristics, and orders. This has the potential to automate coding of ED encounters and save administrative costs and time.
Collapse
|
3
|
An FP, Bai WD, Balantekin AB, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen HY, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Chen ZY, Cheng J, Cheng YC, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deng FS, Ding XY, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Dugas KV, Duyang HY, Dwyer DA, Gallo JP, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Han Y, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Jaffe DE, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones D, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Langford TJ, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nguyen TMT, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Russell B, Steiner H, Sun JL, Tmej T, Tse WH, Tull CE, Tung YC, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wei W, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Wong HLH, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yuan CZ, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JL, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Search for a Sub-eV Sterile Neutrino Using Daya Bay's Full Dataset. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2024; 133:051801. [PMID: 39159085 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.133.051801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
This Letter presents results of a search for the mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with three active neutrinos based on the full data sample of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, collected during 3158 days of detector operation, which contains 5.55×10^{6} reactor ν[over ¯]_{e} candidates identified as inverse beta-decay interactions followed by neutron capture on gadolinium. The analysis benefits from a doubling of the statistics of our previous result and from improvements of several important systematic uncertainties. No significant oscillation due to mixing of a sub-eV sterile neutrino with active neutrinos was found. Exclusion limits are set by both Feldman-Cousins and CLs methods. Light sterile neutrino mixing with sin^{2}2θ_{14}≳0.01 can be excluded at 95% confidence level in the region of 0.01 eV^{2}≲|Δm_{41}^{2}|≲0.1 eV^{2}. This result represents the world-leading constraints in the region of 2×10^{-4} eV^{2}≲|Δm_{41}^{2}|≲0.2 eV^{2}.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mannas MP, Deng FM, Ion-Margineanu A, Jones D, Hoskoppal D, Melamed J, Pastore S, Freudiger C, Orringer DA, Taneja SS. Stimulated Raman Histology Interpretation by Artificial Intelligence Provides Near-Real-Time Pathologic Feedback for Unprocessed Prostate Biopsies. J Urol 2024; 211:384-391. [PMID: 38100831 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stimulated Raman histology is an innovative technology that generates real-time, high-resolution microscopic images of unprocessed tissue, significantly reducing prostate biopsy interpretation time. This study aims to evaluate the ability for an artificial intelligence convolutional neural network to interpretate prostate biopsy histologic images created with stimulated Raman histology. MATERIALS AND METHODS Unprocessed, unlabeled prostate biopsies were prospectively imaged using a stimulated Raman histology microscope. Following stimulated Raman histology creation, the cores underwent standard pathological processing and interpretation by at least 2 genitourinary pathologists to establish a ground truth assessment. A network, trained on 303 prostate biopsies from 100 participants, was used to measure the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of detecting prostate cancer on stimulated Raman histology relative to conventional pathology. The performance of the artificial intelligence was evaluated on an independent 113-biopsy test set. RESULTS Prostate biopsy images obtained through stimulated Raman histology can be generated within a time frame of 2 to 2.75 minutes. The artificial intelligence system achieved a rapid classification of prostate biopsies with cancer, with a potential identification time of approximately 1 minute. The artificial intelligence demonstrated an impressive accuracy of 96.5% in detecting prostate cancer. Moreover, the artificial intelligence exhibited a sensitivity of 96.3% and a specificity of 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS Stimulated Raman histology generates microscopic images capable of accurately identifying prostate cancer in real time, without the need for sectioning or tissue processing. These images can be interpreted by artificial intelligence, providing physicians with near-real-time pathological feedback during the diagnosis or treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Haefke B, Scholz D, Homme J(J, Jones D. Defining the clinical and procedural opportunities available to residents during rural rotations. AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2023; 7:e10922. [PMID: 38046093 PMCID: PMC10688102 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Many emergency medicine (EM) residency programs include clinical rotations in rural emergency departments ("rural rotations") as part of their curriculum. These rotations are designed to expose residents to clinical scenarios that are less frequently encountered in tertiary centers. The objective of this study was to determine the rate at which residents were exposed to certain clinical and procedural experiences (CPEs) while on rural rotations compared to their usual academic training hospital. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patient encounters involving EM residents at a large academic hospital in Rochester, Minnesota, compared with two rural hospitals in Austin, Minnesota, and Albert Lea, Minnesota, from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. The frequency of each CPE was calculated and expressed as the number of CPEs encountered per 100 clinical hours worked. These values were compared between the rural and academic sites. Results A total of 33,417 patient encounters over a total of 41,700 resident clinical hours were analyzed between the three study sites. The two settings (rural vs. academic) had significant differences in baseline patient demographics including age, acuity, and admission rates. Several CPEs were found to occur at a higher frequency in the rural hospitals versus the academic hospital: ambulance necessity documentation (9.3/100 h rural vs. 0.07/100 h academic, p ≤ 0.0001), laceration repair (3.39/100 h rural vs. 2.0/100 h academic, p = 0.0004), and splint/cast application (1.53/100 h rural vs. 0.07/100 h academic, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions Rural EM rotations provide residents exposure to a variety of valuable educational experiences. These rotations may provide residents with superior exposures to some clinical experiences compared to academic hospitals, particularly out-of-ED transfers and orthopedic procedures. Residency programs without a current rural rotation should consider creating this as an option for their trainees.
Collapse
|
6
|
Auerbach MA, Whitfill T, Montgomery E, Leung J, Kessler D, Gross IT, Walsh BM, Fiedor Hamilton M, Gawel M, Kant S, Janofsky S, Brown LL, Walls TA, Alletag M, Sessa A, Arteaga GM, Keilman A, Van Ittersum W, Rutman MS, Zaveri P, Good G, Schoen JC, Lavoie M, Mannenbach M, Bigham L, Dudas RA, Rutledge C, Okada PJ, Moegling M, Anderson I, Tay KY, Scherzer DJ, Vora S, Gaither S, Fenster D, Jones D, Aebersold M, Chatfield J, Knight L, Berg M, Makharashvili A, Katznelson J, Mathias E, Lutfi R, Abu-Sultaneh S, Burns B, Padlipsky P, Lee J, Butler L, Alander S, Thomas A, Bhatnagar A, Jafri FN, Crellin J, Abulebda K. Factors Associated With Improved Pediatric Resuscitative Care in General Emergency Departments. Pediatrics 2023:e2022060790. [PMID: 37416979 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality. METHODS Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored. RESULTS A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores. CONCLUSIONS A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pound G, Eastwood G, Jones D, Hodgson C. Potential role for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) during in-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia: A nested cohort study. CRIT CARE RESUSC 2023; 25:90-96. [PMID: 37876603 PMCID: PMC10581279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective This study aims to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who fulfilled extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) selection criteria during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Design This is a nested cohort study. Setting Code blue data were collected across seven hospitals in Australia between July 2017 and August 2018. Participants Participants who fulfilled E-CPR selection criteria during IHCA were included. Main outcome measures Return of spontaneous circulation and survival and functional outcome at hospital discharge. Functional outcome was measured using the modified Rankin scale, with scores dichotomised into good and poor functional outcome. Results Twenty-three (23/144; 16%) patients fulfilled E-CPR selection criteria during IHCA, and 11/23 (47.8%) had a poor outcome. Patients with a poor outcome were more likely to have a non-shockable rhythm (81.8% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.002), and a longer duration of CPR (median 12.5 [5.5, 39.5] vs. 1.5 [0.3, 2.5] minutes; p < 0.001) compared to those with a good outcome. The majority of patients (18/19 [94.7%]) achieved sustained return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of CPR. All five patients who had CPR >15 minutes had a poor outcome. Conclusion Approximately one in six IHCA patients fulfilled E-CPR selection criteria during IHCA, half of whom had a poor outcome. Non-shockable rhythm and longer duration of CPR were associated with poor outcome. Patients who had CPR for >15 minutes and a poor outcome may have benefited from E-CPR. The feasibility, effectiveness and risks of commencing E-CPR earlier in IHCA and among those with non-shockable rhythms requires further investigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
An FP, Bai WD, Balantekin AB, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen HY, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Cheng J, Cheng J, Cheng YC, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deng FS, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Dugas KV, Duyang HY, Dwyer DA, Gallo JP, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Han Y, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Jaffe DE, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones D, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Langford TJ, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nguyen TMT, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Russell B, Steiner H, Sun JL, Tmej T, Treskov K, Tse WH, Tull CE, Tung YC, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Wong HLH, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JL, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Improved Measurement of the Evolution of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2023; 130:211801. [PMID: 37295075 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.211801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Reactor neutrino experiments play a crucial role in advancing our knowledge of neutrinos. In this Letter, the evolution of the flux and spectrum as a function of the reactor isotopic content is reported in terms of the inverse-beta-decay yield at Daya Bay with 1958 days of data and improved systematic uncertainties. These measurements are compared with two signature model predictions: the Huber-Mueller model based on the conversion method and the SM2018 model based on the summation method. The measured average flux and spectrum, as well as the flux evolution with the ^{239}Pu isotopic fraction, are inconsistent with the predictions of the Huber-Mueller model. In contrast, the SM2018 model is shown to agree with the average flux and its evolution but fails to describe the energy spectrum. Altering the predicted inverse-beta-decay spectrum from ^{239}Pu fission does not improve the agreement with the measurement for either model. The models can be brought into better agreement with the measurements if either the predicted spectrum due to ^{235}U fission is changed or the predicted ^{235}U, ^{238}U, ^{239}Pu, and ^{241}Pu spectra are changed in equal measure.
Collapse
|
9
|
An FP, Bai WD, Balantekin AB, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen HY, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Chen ZY, Cheng J, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deng FS, Ding YY, Ding XY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Duyang HY, Dwyer DA, Gallo JP, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Han Y, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Jaffe DE, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones D, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Langford TJ, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nguyen TMT, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Pan HR, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Russell B, Steiner H, Sun JL, Tmej T, Treskov K, Tse WH, Tull CE, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wei W, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Wong HLH, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JL, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2023; 130:161802. [PMID: 37154643 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.161802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
We present a new determination of the smallest neutrino mixing angle θ_{13} and the mass-squared difference Δm_{32}^{2} using a final sample of 5.55×10^{6} inverse beta-decay (IBD) candidates with the final-state neutron captured on gadolinium. This sample is selected from the complete dataset obtained by the Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment in 3158 days of operation. Compared to the previous Daya Bay results, selection of IBD candidates has been optimized, energy calibration refined, and treatment of backgrounds further improved. The resulting oscillation parameters are sin^{2}2θ_{13}=0.0851±0.0024, Δm_{32}^{2}=(2.466±0.060)×10^{-3} eV^{2} for the normal mass ordering or Δm_{32}^{2}=-(2.571±0.060)×10^{-3} eV^{2} for the inverted mass ordering.
Collapse
|
10
|
Langridge N, Welch H, Jones D, Small C, Lynch G, Ganatra B. Portfolios in practice: Developing advancing practice within a musculoskeletal competency-based model. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 63:102689. [PMID: 36402698 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of professional portfolios and the relevance of this within professional practice, competency and capability is gaining significant credibility in line with professional requirements. Nursing and medicine in terms of historical perspectives have long held the need for clinicians to maintain a portfolio for professional validation, whilst in other professional groups it is a requirement of registration. The allied health professionals, physiotherapy and ultimately musculoskeletal practice within this context are rapidly developing advancing and consultant practice. This professional development further requires appropriate verification and validation of practice, and achieving this can be through formal and non-formal routes. PURPOSE This paper looks to explore this and give direction to professionals developing portfolios whilst placing the requirements in context to contemporary practice in the U.K. Universities, professional bodies and special interest groups are now aligning in the need to support practice in a multi-format way, that moves away from traditional methods of evaluation into more diverse models of competency-based assessment. IMPLICATIONS With improvement in technology, the development of national frameworks and standards, portfolios in practice although commonly considered as standard practice will be a requirement not only of registration but as a criteria of maintaining status, career development and expansion of roles. BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy in the U.K. has moved forward significantly in the last 20 years. Sitting within a clinical reasoned framework, the introduction of additional skills such is image requesting, injection therapies, and non-medical prescribing has further underpinned the advanced practice agenda (Langridge et al., 2015). While these advancements in practice are driving the profession forward, challenges remain in providing the workforce with a clear process of career development. Alongside developing professional pathways methods of evidencing advanced knowledge and skills acquired outside formal routes are required to support practitioners' career pathway into advancing practice.
Collapse
|
11
|
De Velasco Oria G, Garralda E, Moreno Garcia V, Melero I, Victoria Ruiz I, Indacochea A, Cervantes A, Oberoi A, Jones D, Lakins M, Kayitalire L. 173P First-in-human study to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of FS222: A tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CD137, in patients with advanced solid tumors. IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
12
|
Mao S, Rosner S, Forde P, Chaft J, Jones D, Spicer J, Hales R, Ha J, Hu C, Voong R. Patterns of Failure in Resectable Stage I-IIIA NSCLC Treated with Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combinations, a Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
13
|
O’Brien M, Jones D, Semciw A, Balakumar J, Grabinski R, Roebert J, Coburn G, Mechlenburg I, Kemp J. Does the use of i-FACTOR bone graft affect bone healing in those undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia? J Sci Med Sport 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
14
|
Moore Z, Huang X, Lobaugh S, Geyer A, Gelblum D, Shepherd A, Shaverdian N, Wu A, Chaft J, Zauderer M, Rudin C, Chawla M, Jones D, Sopka D, Mak R, Liao Z, Gomez D, Zhang Z, Paik P, Rimner A. Biomarkers Associated with Pulmonary Exacerbations in a Prospective, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Nintedanib for the Treatment of Radiation Pneumonitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
15
|
Shaverdian N, Shepherd A, Offin M, Gelblum D, Wu A, Simone C, Schoenfeld A, Jones D, Rimner A, Chaft J, Riaz N, Gomez D. Tumor Mutational Burden Predicts Progression-Free Survival and Local-Regional Control in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiation and Durvalumab. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Manjooran S, Rathod K, Wright P, Antoniou S, Fhadil S, Wragg A, Ozkor M, Baumach A, Mathur A, Jones D. Low dose rivaroxaban therapy in aspirin allergic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor is the mainstay of treatment post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, patients who are allergic to or intolerant to aspirin pose a therapeutic challenge especially when encountered in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. Aspirin desensitization strategies have been used in clinical practice to build tolerance prior to coronary intervention but clearly are not practical in the setting of ACS or significant symptomatic CAD. Low dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) has been previously shown to be safe in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor post ACS compared to aspirin. We therefore sought to see if low dose rivaroxaban is a safe and effective alternative to aspirin in patients post PCI who are unable to take aspirin.This study aims to compare the efficacy (Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)) and safety (Bleeding events as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria) in patients with confirmed aspirin allergy who were treated with low dose rivaroxaban therapy in place of aspirin in combination with P2Y12 inhibitors post PCI.
Methods
This was a single center observational study which looked at 50 cases of patients with aspirin allergy (47 cases) or significant confirmed aspirin intolerance (3 cases) who underwent PCI between December 2017 and February 2022. Patients were advised to take low dose rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day as an alternative to aspirin 75 mg once a day. A comparator group of 50 matched patients without aspirin allergy who underwent PCI during the same time period and treated with standard aspirin therapy (75mg) along with a P2Y12 inhibitor. Outcomes over follow-up were MACE (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unscheduled revascularisation) and bleeding events defined by–BARC criteria.
Results
The median age of the aspirin allergy cohort was 62 years old with typical comorbidities associated with CAD. The cohort included a case mix of ACS and stable angina.The P2Y12 inhibitor in the majority of cases (76%) was Clopidogrel; Ticagrelor was used in 20% of cases and Prasugrel in 4% cases. No differences existed between the rivaroxaban and matched patient groups. The median follow-up as 626 days (Interquartile range 237–549). The duration of low dose rivaroxaban therapy was for 12 months with a P2Y12 in 72%, 1–3 months for 22% and finally continued long term (with P2Y12 discontinuation at 12 months) in 6%. No difference existed in the incidence of MACE between the low dose rivaroxaban group (12%) compared to the matched cohort (10% p=0.266). No difference in bleeding outcomes (any bleeding event BARC type >0) were seen (14% in rivaroxaban and 16% in control, p=0.329).
Conclusions
This study provides more supporting evidence that low dose rivaroxaban therapy is an alternative to aspirin when used in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor post PCI.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
17
|
Spirito A, Koh WJ, Sartori S, Snyder C, Nicholas J, Cao D, Vogel B, Rezvanizadeh V, Jones D, Baber U, Sweeny J, Sharma S, Kini A, Dangas G, Mehran R. Prevalence and impact of TWILIGHT criteria in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention (TWILIGHT) randomized clinical trial demonstrated that in selected high risk patients who took ticagrelor and aspirin for 3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), continuing ticagrelor alone was associated with significantly less bleeding events than ticagrelor plus aspirin and did not lead to ischemic harm over a period of 1 year (1).
The prevalence and risk of adverse events of patients fulfilling the TWILIGHT inclusion criteria in real-world setting is unclear.
Purpose
To elucidate the prevalence and prognosis of patients fulfilling the TWILIGHT inclusion criteria.
Methods
Patients that received at least one drug eluting stent in a coronary artery at a large tertiary center (Mount Sinai Hospital, New York) were considered for inclusion. As in the TWILIGHT trial, individuals on chronic oral anticoagulation treatment, with STEMI, cardiogenic shock, on dialysis, with prior stroke, or platelet count <100,000 were excluded. Patients were stratified in two groups: 1) TWILIGHT-like patients, who met at least one clinical (age ≥65 years, female sex, established vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, estimated glomerular fraction rate <60mL/min, acute coronary syndrome with troponin increase) and one angiographic (multivessel coronary artery disease [CAD], stent length >30mm, thrombotic target lesion, bifurcation requiring 2 stents, left main or proximal left anterior descending artery lesion, atherectomy device use, SYNTAX score ≥23) TWILIGHT inclusion criterion; 2) Non-TWILIGHT-like patients, who did not fulfil at least one clinical and one angiographic TWILIGHT inclusion criterion.
The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke. Secondary outcomes included bleeding, components of the primary outcome, target vessel and target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis. All events were assessed at 1 year after PCI.
Results
Out of 30,470 patients undergoing PCI between 2012 and 2019, 13,236 were included in the current analysis. TWILIGHT criteria were met in 11,018 (83%) patients. Established vascular disease and multivessel CAD were the most frequently fulfilled criteria. At 1 year, TWILIGHT-like patients were at higher risk for the primary outcome (3.2% vs 1.1%, HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.83–4.44), severe bleeding (3.3% vs 1.8%, HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32–2.62), all-cause death (1.4% vs 0.4%, HR 3.63, 95% CI 1.70–7.77), myocardial infarction (1.8% vs 0.6%, HR 2.81 95% CI 1.56–5.04), TVR (7.8% vs 4.1%, HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.53–2.47), TLR (5.1% vs 1.7%, HR 2.98 95% CI 2.07–4.29). Stent thrombosis and stroke rate were generally low and did not differ between patients meeting or not the TWILIGHT inclusion criteria.
Conclusion
Among all-comer patients undergoing PCI, the fulfillment of the TWILIGHT inclusion criteria is frequent and is associated with a higher risk of death, ischemic and bleeding complications
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
18
|
Teoh Z, Rathod K, Tyrlis A, Choudry F, Comer K, Guttmann O, Jain A, Wragg A, Archbold A, Baumbach A, Mathur A, Jones D. Comparison of thrombus burden in patients with COVID-19 presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction across the three waves of outbreak in the United Kingdom. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
It has been previously reported during the first COVID outbreak that patients presenting with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and concurrent COVID-19 infection have increased thrombus burden and poorer outcomes [1]. Subsequently, there have been multiple further waves of the pandemic with the emergence of at least two new COVID-19 variants and the emergence of vaccinations. To-date, there have been no reports comparing the outcomes of COVID-19-positive STEMI patients across all waves of the pandemic.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the baseline demographic, procedural and angiographic characteristics alongside the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection across the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.
Methods
This was a single-centre, observational study of 1250 consecutive patients admitted with confirmed STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Barts Heart Centre between 01/03/2020 and 10/03/2022. COVID +ve patients were split into 3 groups based upon the time course of the pandemic (Wave 1: March 2020-June 2020, Wave 2: Sept 2020-March 2021, Wave 3: October 2021-March 2022). Comparison was made between waves and with a control group of COVID-ve patients treated during the same timeframe.
Results
A total of 135 COVID +ive patients with STEMI (1st Wave: 39 patients, 2nd Wave: 60 patients, 3rd wave 35 pts) were included in the present analysis; and compared with 1115 COVID negative patients. Significant changes in the baseline characteristics, angiographic features and clinical outcomes of COVID +ive patients occurred over time. Early during the pandemic (Wave 1 2020), STEMI patients presenting with concurrent COVID-19 infection had high rates of cardiac arrest, evidence of increased thrombus burden (higher rates of multi-vessel thrombosis, stent thrombosis, higher modified thrombus grade higher use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombus aspiration, coagulability (more heparin for therapeutic ACT), bigger infarcts (lower myocardial blush grade and left ventricular function) and worse outcomes (mortality). However, by wave 3 (late 2021/2022), no differences existed in clinical characteristics, thrombus burden, infarct size or outcomes between COVID +ive patients and those without concurrent COVID-19 infection with significant differences compared to earlier COVID +ve patients. Poor outcomes later in the study period were predominantly in unvaccinated individuals.
Conclusions
Significant changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics, angiographic features and outcomes of STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection treated by primary PCI during the course of the pandemic. Importantly it appears that angiographic features and outcomes of recent waves are no different to a non-COVID-19 population.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones D, Sartori S, Cao D, Nicolas J, Spirito A, Beerkens F, Edens M, Synder C, Dangas G, Mehran R. Impact of body mass index on outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recent advances in drug eluting stents (DES) design have significantly decreased the rates of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Nonetheless, ISR remains a major problem, affecting 5–10% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, PCI for ISR is often a poor prognostic factor for outcomes after the procedure. Historically, obese patients tended to have better outcomes when undergoing PCI, however it is unclear if this trend continues for the same population undergoing PCI for ISR.
Purpose
Investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI for ISR in the overweight and normal weight population.
Methods
All patients undergoing PCI with DES implantation at a tertiary care center from January 2012 to December 2019 were included. Normal weight was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 18.5 kg/m2 and less than 25 kg/m2, while overweight was defined as a BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2. Patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2, underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction (MI), or received a bare metal stent (BMS) were excluded. The primary outcome was major events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) up to one year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint.
Results
Out of 16,234 patients with available data on BMI, 12,444 (76.7%) were overweight and 3,790 (23.3%) were normal weight. Among overweight patients, 2,879 (23.1%) underwent PCI for ISR versus 815 (21.5%) of normal weight patients. Regardless of BMI status, patients undergoing PCI for ISR had higher rates of co-morbidities such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus than non-ISR counterparts. At one year post PCI, both overweight and normal weight patients undergoing PCI for ISR had increased risk of MACE (overweight: 18.4% vs. 6.7%; HR 2.83; 95% CI 2.50–3.20; normal weight: 18.8% vs. 7.8%, HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.95–3.04) when compared to non-ISR counterparts, mostly driven by TVR (overweight: 16% vs. 4.6%; HR 3.58; 95% CI 3.11–4.13; normal weight: 15.2% vs. 4.1%; HR 3.69; 95% CI 2.80–4.86). However, only overweight patients undergoing PCI for ISR had higher risk of all cause mortality (2.2% vs. 1.5%; HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.03–1.95) and MI (3.0% vs. 1.3%, HR 2.22; 95% CI 1.64–2.99) when compared to non-ISR counterparts (Figure 1).
Conclusions
PCI for ISR was associated with increased risk of MACE, irrespective of body weight. The risks of all-cause mortality and MI in ISR vs non-ISR patients only reached statistical significance in overweight patients.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
20
|
Morgan H, Jones J, Rathod K, O'Dowling R, Pieri C, Antoniou S, Mathur A, Perera D, Jones D. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of left ventricular thrombi. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) complicates around one in six cases of acute and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, major systemic embolism and death, believed to be ameliorated by anticoagulation. Off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LVT has steadily increased, largely based on favourable outcomes in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, but the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for LVT remains uncertain.
Purpose
The main aim of our study was to compare treatment of LVT with VKA to DOAC, focusing on all-cause mortality, stroke, major systemic emboli and major bleeding.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective observational longitudinal study of patients presenting to two large quaternary centres between 2011 and 2021 with a diagnosis of LVT. Patients were eligible if they had a documented LVT and received anticoagulation with either VKA or DOAC. Baseline data, thrombus characteristics, treatment type and duration, follow up imaging and clinical events were recorded using electronic health care records. Outcome measures included thrombus resolution, stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding and mortality.
Results
A total of 955 patients were identified, of whom 901 received treatment with either a VKA (567 pts, 62.9%) or a DOAC (334 pts, 37.1%) and were included in the analysis. Underlying aetiologies included acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (38.3%), chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy (38.0%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (23.7%). Rivaroxaban (43.4%) was the most frequently prescribed DOAC followed by apixaban (35.9%), and the remaining on edoxaban (20.7%). AMI related LVT was more commonly treated with DOAC (53.0%) and chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy with VKA (72.9%).
There was a lower baseline LVEF in the VKA cohort (29.5±13.2 vs 33.1±14.2, p<0.0001). Other demographic features were comparable. Median follow up was 2.5 years (IQR: 1–3.5). There were no differences in follow up duration between the two treatments (p=0.17). Greater rates of thrombus resolution were seen in the DOAC group compared to VKA (1 year: 78.4% vs 51.4%, p<0.0001), with higher rates of persistent thrombus over the follow-up period seen in the VKA group (25.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.0001). Rates of stroke and systemic embolization were similar between the groups (VKA 9.3% vs 9.6% DOAC, p=0.93). Higher rates of bleeding (BARC >3, 8.1% VKA, 3.6% DOAC, p=0.031) (Figure 1A) and mortality (VKA 18.5%, DOAC 10.2%, p=0.001) (Figure 1B) were seen in the VKA group over the follow-up period.
Conclusions
In a large multi-centre registry of LVT of mixed aetiology, anticoagulation with DOAC was associated with earlier and greater rates of thrombus resolution and consequential reduced adverse events (major bleeding and mortality) during follow up. A funding application to support a multi-centre randomised control trial is underway.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (Fellowship FS/CRTF/21/24190 to HM) and the National Institute for Health Research (Biomedical Research Centre Award to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS FT and King's College London).
Collapse
|
21
|
Lim T, Campbell R, Jones D, Mullan A, Lichen I, Knier C, Bellamkonda V. 72 Association of Limited English Proficiency and Increased Emergency Department Waiting Room Lengths of Stay. Ann Emerg Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|
22
|
Torkington J, Harries R, O'Connell S, Knight L, Islam S, Bashir N, Watkins A, Fegan G, Cornish J, Rees B, Cole H, Jarvis H, Jones S, Russell I, Bosanquet D, Cleves A, Sewell B, Farr A, Zbrzyzna N, Fiera N, Ellis-Owen R, Hilton Z, Parry C, Bradbury A, Wall P, Hill J, Winter D, Cocks K, Harris D, Hilton J, Vakis S, Hanratty D, Rajagopal R, Akbar F, Ben-Sassi A, Francis N, Jones L, Williamson M, Lindsey I, West R, Smart C, Ziprin P, Agarwal T, Faulkner G, Pinkney T, Vimalachandran D, Lawes D, Faiz O, Nisar P, Smart N, Wilson T, Myers A, Lund J, Smolarek S, Acheson A, Horwood J, Ansell J, Phillips S, Davies M, Davies L, Bird S, Palmer N, Williams M, Galanopoulos G, Rao PD, Jones D, Barnett R, Tate S, Wheat J, Patel N, Rahmani S, Toynton E, Smith L, Reeves N, Kealaher E, Williams G, Sekaran C, Evans M, Beynon J, Egan R, Qasem E, Khot U, Ather S, Mummigati P, Taylor G, Williamson J, Lim J, Powell A, Nageswaran H, Williams A, Padmanabhan J, Phillips K, Ford T, Edwards J, Varney N, Hicks L, Greenway C, Chesters K, Jones H, Blake P, Brown C, Roche L, Jones D, Feeney M, Shah P, Rutter C, McGrath C, Curtis N, Pippard L, Perry J, Allison J, Ockrim J, Dalton R, Allison A, Rendell J, Howard L, Beesley K, Dennison G, Burton J, Bowen G, Duberley S, Richards L, Giles J, Katebe J, Dalton S, Wood J, Courtney E, Hompes R, Poole A, Ward S, Wilkinson L, Hardstaff L, Bogden M, Al-Rashedy M, Fensom C, Lunt N, McCurrie M, Peacock R, Malik K, Burns H, Townley B, Hill P, Sadat M, Khan U, Wignall C, Murati D, Dhanaratne M, Quaid S, Gurram S, Smith D, Harris P, Pollard J, DiBenedetto G, Chadwick J, Hull R, Bach S, Morton D, Hollier K, Hardy V, Ghods M, Tyrrell D, Ashraf S, Glasbey J, Ashraf M, Garner S, Whitehouse A, Yeung D, Mohamed SN, Wilkin R, Suggett N, Lee C, Bagul A, McNeill C, Eardley N, Mahapatra R, Gabriel C, Datt P, Mahmud S, Daniels I, McDermott F, Nodolsk M, Park L, Scott H, Trickett J, Bearn P, Trivedi P, Frost V, Gray C, Croft M, Beral D, Osborne J, Pugh R, Herdman G, George R, Howell AM, Al-Shahaby S, Narendrakumar B, Mohsen Y, Ijaz S, Nasseri M, Herrod P, Brear T, Reilly JJ, Sohal A, Otieno C, Lai W, Coleman M, Platt E, Patrick A, Pitman C, Balasubramanya S, Dickson E, Warman R, Newton C, Tani S, Simpson J, Banerjee A, Siddika A, Campion D, Humes D, Randhawa N, Saunders J, Bharathan B, Hay O. Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: Hughes Abdominal Repair Randomized Trial (HART). Br J Surg 2022; 109:943-950. [PMID: 35979802 PMCID: PMC10364691 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernias cause morbidity and may require further surgery. HART (Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial) assessed the effect of an alternative suture method on the incidence of incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS A pragmatic multicentre single-blind RCT allocated patients undergoing midline incision for colorectal cancer to either Hughes closure (double far-near-near-far sutures of 1 nylon suture at 2-cm intervals along the fascia combined with conventional mass closure) or the surgeon's standard closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of incisional hernia at 1 year assessed by clinical examination. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS Between August 2014 and February 2018, 802 patients were randomized to either Hughes closure (401) or the standard mass closure group (401). At 1 year after surgery, 672 patients (83.7 per cent) were included in the primary outcome analysis; 50 of 339 patients (14.8 per cent) in the Hughes group and 57 of 333 (17.1 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.55 to 1.27; P = 0.402). At 2 years, 78 patients (28.7 per cent) in the Hughes repair group and 84 (31.8 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.86, 0.59 to 1.25; P = 0.429). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, apart from the rate of surgical-site infection, which was higher in the Hughes group (13.2 versus 7.7 per cent; OR 1.82, 1.14 to 2.91; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION The incidence of incisional hernia after colorectal cancer surgery is high. There was no statistical difference in incidence between Hughes closure and mass closure at 1 or 2 years. REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN25616490 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu I, Jiang L, Samuelsson E, Marco Salas S, Hack O, Jeong D, Shaw M, Englinger B, LaBelle J, Ernst K, Palova H, Pokorna P, Sterba J, Slaby O, Geyeregger R, Jones D, Koschmann C, Svedlund J, Resnick A, Diaz A, Haberler C, Czech T, Slavc I, Cotter J, Ligon K, Alexandrescu S, Yung W, Arrillaga-Romany I, Suva M, Beck A, Gojo J, Monje M, Nilsson M, Filbin M. JS04.6.A The landscape of tumor cell states and spatial organization in H3-K27M mutant diffuse midline glioma across age and location. Neuro Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Histone 3 lysine27-to-methionine mutations (H3-K27M) frequently occur in childhood diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) of the pons, thalamus and spinal cord, presumed to be driven by the specific spatiotemporal context of these midline locations during postnatal development. While most common in the pons and at mid-childhood ages, the same oncohistone mutation is recurrently detected in adult DMGs and throughout different midline regions. The potential heterogeneity of tumors at different ages and in different anatomical locations of the midline are vastly understudied.
Material and Methods
Through dissecting the transcriptomic, epigenomic and spatial architectures of a comprehensive cohort of patient H3-K27M DMGs - spanning the age range from 2-68 years and locations from spinal cord to thalamus - at single cell resolution, we delineate how age- and location-dependent contexts shape glioma cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic features in light of the shared driver mutation.
Results
We identify that oligodendrocyte precursor (OPC)-like cells constitute the stem-like compartment in H3-K27M DMGs across all clinico-anatomical groups, however, depending on location, display varying levels of maturity resembling less differentiated pre-OPCs or more mature OPCs further differentiated along the oligodendroglial lineage. We further demonstrate increased mesenchymal cell states in adult tumors, which we link to age-related differences in glioma-associated immune cell compartments. We for the first time resolve the spatial organization of H3-K27M DMG cell types in intact patient tissues, identifying a local niche of the oligodendroglial lineage.
Conclusion
Our study provides a powerful resource for rational modeling and therapeutic frameworks taking into account determinants of age and location in this lethal glioma group.
Collapse
|
24
|
Evans RA, Leavy OC, Richardson M, Elneima O, McAuley HJC, Shikotra A, Singapuri A, Sereno M, Saunders RM, Harris VC, Houchen-Wolloff L, Aul R, Beirne P, Bolton CE, Brown JS, Choudhury G, Diar-Bakerly N, Easom N, Echevarria C, Fuld J, Hart N, Hurst J, Jones MG, Parekh D, Pfeffer P, Rahman NM, Rowland-Jones SL, Shah AM, Wootton DG, Chalder T, Davies MJ, De Soyza A, Geddes JR, Greenhalf W, Greening NJ, Heaney LG, Heller S, Howard LS, Jacob J, Jenkins RG, Lord JM, Man WDC, McCann GP, Neubauer S, Openshaw PJM, Porter JC, Rowland MJ, Scott JT, Semple MG, Singh SJ, Thomas DC, Toshner M, Lewis KE, Thwaites RS, Briggs A, Docherty AB, Kerr S, Lone NI, Quint J, Sheikh A, Thorpe M, Zheng B, Chalmers JD, Ho LP, Horsley A, Marks M, Poinasamy K, Raman B, Harrison EM, Wain LV, Brightling CE, Abel K, Adamali H, Adeloye D, Adeyemi O, Adrego R, Aguilar Jimenez LA, Ahmad S, Ahmad Haider N, Ahmed R, Ahwireng N, Ainsworth M, Al-Sheklly B, Alamoudi A, Ali M, Aljaroof M, All AM, Allan L, Allen RJ, Allerton L, Allsop L, Almeida P, Altmann D, Alvarez Corral M, Amoils S, Anderson D, Antoniades C, Arbane G, Arias A, Armour C, Armstrong L, Armstrong N, Arnold D, Arnold H, Ashish A, Ashworth A, Ashworth M, Aslani S, Assefa-Kebede H, Atkin C, Atkin P, Aung H, Austin L, Avram C, Ayoub A, Babores M, Baggott R, Bagshaw J, Baguley D, Bailey L, Baillie JK, Bain S, Bakali M, Bakau M, Baldry E, Baldwin D, Ballard C, Banerjee A, Bang B, Barker RE, Barman L, Barratt S, Barrett F, Basire D, Basu N, Bates M, Bates A, Batterham R, Baxendale H, Bayes H, Beadsworth M, Beckett P, Beggs M, Begum M, Bell D, Bell R, Bennett K, Beranova E, Bermperi A, Berridge A, Berry C, Betts S, Bevan E, Bhui K, Bingham M, Birchall K, Bishop L, Bisnauthsing K, Blaikely J, Bloss A, Bolger A, Bonnington J, Botkai A, Bourne C, Bourne M, Bramham K, Brear L, Breen G, Breeze J, Bright E, Brill S, Brindle K, Broad L, Broadley A, Brookes C, Broome M, Brown A, Brown A, Brown J, Brown J, Brown M, Brown M, Brown V, Brugha T, Brunskill N, Buch M, Buckley P, Bularga A, Bullmore E, Burden L, Burdett T, Burn D, Burns G, Burns A, Busby J, Butcher R, Butt A, Byrne S, Cairns P, Calder PC, Calvelo E, Carborn H, Card B, Carr C, Carr L, Carson G, Carter P, Casey A, Cassar M, Cavanagh J, Chablani M, Chambers RC, Chan F, Channon KM, Chapman K, Charalambou A, Chaudhuri N, Checkley A, Chen J, Cheng Y, Chetham L, Childs C, Chilvers ER, Chinoy H, Chiribiri A, Chong-James K, Choudhury N, Chowienczyk P, Christie C, Chrystal M, Clark D, Clark C, Clarke J, Clohisey S, Coakley G, Coburn Z, Coetzee S, Cole J, Coleman C, Conneh F, Connell D, Connolly B, Connor L, Cook A, Cooper B, Cooper J, Cooper S, Copeland D, Cosier T, Coulding M, Coupland C, Cox E, Craig T, Crisp P, Cristiano D, Crooks MG, Cross A, Cruz I, Cullinan P, Cuthbertson D, Daines L, Dalton M, Daly P, Daniels A, Dark P, Dasgin J, David A, David C, Davies E, Davies F, Davies G, Davies GA, Davies K, Dawson J, Daynes E, Deakin B, Deans A, Deas C, Deery J, Defres S, Dell A, Dempsey K, Denneny E, Dennis J, Dewar A, Dharmagunawardena R, Dickens C, Dipper A, Diver S, Diwanji SN, Dixon M, Djukanovic R, Dobson H, Dobson SL, Donaldson A, Dong T, Dormand N, Dougherty A, Dowling R, Drain S, Draxlbauer K, Drury K, Dulawan P, Dunleavy A, Dunn S, Earley J, Edwards S, Edwardson C, El-Taweel H, Elliott A, Elliott K, Ellis Y, Elmer A, Evans D, Evans H, Evans J, Evans R, Evans RI, Evans T, Evenden C, Evison L, Fabbri L, Fairbairn S, Fairman A, Fallon K, Faluyi D, Favager C, Fayzan T, Featherstone J, Felton T, Finch J, Finney S, Finnigan J, Finnigan L, Fisher H, Fletcher S, Flockton R, Flynn M, Foot H, Foote D, Ford A, Forton D, Fraile E, Francis C, Francis R, Francis S, Frankel A, Fraser E, Free R, French N, Fu X, Furniss J, Garner L, Gautam N, George J, George P, Gibbons M, Gill M, Gilmour L, Gleeson F, Glossop J, Glover S, Goodman N, Goodwin C, Gooptu B, Gordon H, Gorsuch T, Greatorex M, Greenhaff PL, Greenhalgh A, Greenwood J, Gregory H, Gregory R, Grieve D, Griffin D, Griffiths L, Guerdette AM, Guillen Guio B, Gummadi M, Gupta A, Gurram S, Guthrie E, Guy Z, H Henson H, Hadley K, Haggar A, Hainey K, Hairsine B, Haldar P, Hall I, Hall L, Halling-Brown M, Hamil R, Hancock A, Hancock K, Hanley NA, Haq S, Hardwick HE, Hardy E, Hardy T, Hargadon B, Harrington K, Harris E, Harrison P, Harvey A, Harvey M, Harvie M, Haslam L, Havinden-Williams M, Hawkes J, Hawkings N, Haworth J, Hayday A, Haynes M, Hazeldine J, Hazelton T, Heeley C, Heeney JL, Heightman M, Henderson M, Hesselden L, Hewitt M, Highett V, Hillman T, Hiwot T, Hoare A, Hoare M, Hockridge J, Hogarth P, Holbourn A, Holden S, Holdsworth L, Holgate D, Holland M, Holloway L, Holmes K, Holmes M, Holroyd-Hind B, Holt L, Hormis A, Hosseini A, Hotopf M, Howard K, Howell A, Hufton E, Hughes AD, Hughes J, Hughes R, Humphries A, Huneke N, Hurditch E, Husain M, Hussell T, Hutchinson J, Ibrahim W, Ilyas F, Ingham J, Ingram L, Ionita D, Isaacs K, Ismail K, Jackson T, James WY, Jarman C, Jarrold I, Jarvis H, Jastrub R, Jayaraman B, Jezzard P, Jiwa K, Johnson C, Johnson S, Johnston D, Jolley CJ, Jones D, Jones G, Jones H, Jones H, Jones I, Jones L, Jones S, Jose S, Kabir T, Kaltsakas G, Kamwa V, Kanellakis N, Kaprowska S, Kausar Z, Keenan N, Kelly S, Kemp G, Kerslake H, Key AL, Khan F, Khunti K, Kilroy S, King B, King C, Kingham L, Kirk J, Kitterick P, Klenerman P, Knibbs L, Knight S, Knighton A, Kon O, Kon S, Kon SS, Koprowska S, Korszun A, Koychev I, Kurasz C, Kurupati P, Laing C, Lamlum H, Landers G, Langenberg C, Lasserson D, Lavelle-Langham L, Lawrie A, Lawson C, Lawson C, Layton A, Lea A, Lee D, Lee JH, Lee E, Leitch K, Lenagh R, Lewis D, Lewis J, Lewis V, Lewis-Burke N, Li X, Light T, Lightstone L, Lilaonitkul W, Lim L, Linford S, Lingford-Hughes A, Lipman M, Liyanage K, Lloyd A, Logan S, Lomas D, Loosley R, Lota H, Lovegrove W, Lucey A, Lukaschuk E, Lye A, Lynch C, MacDonald S, MacGowan G, Macharia I, Mackie J, Macliver L, Madathil S, Madzamba G, Magee N, Magtoto MM, Mairs N, Majeed N, Major E, Malein F, Malim M, Mallison G, Mandal S, Mangion K, Manisty C, Manley R, March K, Marciniak S, Marino P, Mariveles M, Marouzet E, Marsh S, Marshall B, Marshall M, Martin J, Martineau A, Martinez LM, Maskell N, Matila D, Matimba-Mupaya W, Matthews L, Mbuyisa A, McAdoo S, Weir McCall J, McAllister-Williams H, McArdle A, McArdle P, McAulay D, McCormick J, McCormick W, McCourt P, McGarvey L, McGee C, Mcgee K, McGinness J, McGlynn K, McGovern A, McGuinness H, McInnes IB, McIntosh J, McIvor E, McIvor K, McLeavey L, McMahon A, McMahon MJ, McMorrow L, Mcnally T, McNarry M, McNeill J, McQueen A, McShane H, Mears C, Megson C, Megson S, Mehta P, Meiring J, Melling L, Mencias M, Menzies D, Merida Morillas M, Michael A, Milligan L, Miller C, Mills C, Mills NL, Milner L, Misra S, Mitchell J, Mohamed A, Mohamed N, Mohammed S, Molyneaux PL, Monteiro W, Moriera S, Morley A, Morrison L, Morriss R, Morrow A, Moss AJ, Moss P, Motohashi K, Msimanga N, Mukaetova-Ladinska E, Munawar U, Murira J, Nanda U, Nassa H, Nasseri M, Neal A, Needham R, Neill P, Newell H, Newman T, Newton-Cox A, Nicholson T, Nicoll D, Nolan CM, Noonan MJ, Norman C, Novotny P, Nunag J, Nwafor L, Nwanguma U, Nyaboko J, O'Donnell K, O'Brien C, O'Brien L, O'Regan D, Odell N, Ogg G, Olaosebikan O, Oliver C, Omar Z, Orriss-Dib L, Osborne L, Osbourne R, Ostermann M, Overton C, Owen J, Oxton J, Pack J, Pacpaco E, Paddick S, Painter S, Pakzad A, Palmer S, Papineni P, Paques K, Paradowski K, Pareek M, Parfrey H, Pariante C, Parker S, Parkes M, Parmar J, Patale S, Patel B, Patel M, Patel S, Pattenadk D, Pavlides M, Payne S, Pearce L, Pearl JE, Peckham D, Pendlebury J, Peng Y, Pennington C, Peralta I, Perkins E, Peterkin Z, Peto T, Petousi N, Petrie J, Phipps J, Pimm J, Piper Hanley K, Pius R, Plant H, Plein S, Plekhanova T, Plowright M, Polgar O, Poll L, Porter J, Portukhay S, Powell N, Prabhu A, Pratt J, Price A, Price C, Price C, Price D, Price L, Price L, Prickett A, Propescu J, Pugmire S, Quaid S, Quigley J, Qureshi H, Qureshi IN, Radhakrishnan K, Ralser M, Ramos A, Ramos H, Rangeley J, Rangelov B, Ratcliffe L, Ravencroft P, Reddington A, Reddy R, Redfearn H, Redwood D, Reed A, Rees M, Rees T, Regan K, Reynolds W, Ribeiro C, Richards A, Richardson E, Rivera-Ortega P, Roberts K, Robertson E, Robinson E, Robinson L, Roche L, Roddis C, Rodger J, Ross A, Ross G, Rossdale J, Rostron A, Rowe A, Rowland A, Rowland J, Roy K, Roy M, Rudan I, Russell R, Russell E, Saalmink G, Sabit R, Sage EK, Samakomva T, Samani N, Sampson C, Samuel K, Samuel R, Sanderson A, Sapey E, Saralaya D, Sargant J, Sarginson C, Sass T, Sattar N, Saunders K, Saunders P, Saunders LC, Savill H, Saxon W, Sayer A, Schronce J, Schwaeble W, Scott K, Selby N, Sewell TA, Shah K, Shah P, Shankar-Hari M, Sharma M, Sharpe C, Sharpe M, Shashaa S, Shaw A, Shaw K, Shaw V, Shelton S, Shenton L, Shevket K, Short J, Siddique S, Siddiqui S, Sidebottom J, Sigfrid L, Simons G, Simpson J, Simpson N, Singh C, Singh S, Sissons D, Skeemer J, Slack K, Smith A, Smith D, Smith S, Smith J, Smith L, Soares M, Solano TS, Solly R, Solstice AR, Soulsby T, Southern D, Sowter D, Spears M, Spencer LG, Speranza F, Stadon L, Stanel S, Steele N, Steiner M, Stensel D, Stephens G, Stephenson L, Stern M, Stewart I, Stimpson R, Stockdale S, Stockley J, Stoker W, Stone R, Storrar W, Storrie A, Storton K, Stringer E, Strong-Sheldrake S, Stroud N, Subbe C, Sudlow CL, Suleiman Z, Summers C, Summersgill C, Sutherland D, Sykes DL, Sykes R, Talbot N, Tan AL, Tarusan L, Tavoukjian V, Taylor A, Taylor C, Taylor J, Te A, Tedd H, Tee CJ, Teixeira J, Tench H, Terry S, Thackray-Nocera S, Thaivalappil F, Thamu B, Thickett D, Thomas C, Thomas S, Thomas AK, Thomas-Woods T, Thompson T, Thompson AAR, Thornton T, Tilley J, Tinker N, Tiongson GF, Tobin M, Tomlinson J, Tong C, Touyz R, Tripp KA, Tunnicliffe E, Turnbull A, Turner E, Turner S, Turner V, Turner K, Turney S, Turtle L, Turton H, Ugoji J, Ugwuoke R, Upthegrove R, Valabhji J, Ventura M, Vere J, Vickers C, Vinson B, Wade E, Wade P, Wainwright T, Wajero LO, Walder S, Walker S, Walker S, Wall E, Wallis T, Walmsley S, Walsh JA, Walsh S, Warburton L, Ward TJC, Warwick K, Wassall H, Waterson S, Watson E, Watson L, Watson J, Welch C, Welch H, Welsh B, Wessely S, West S, Weston H, Wheeler H, White S, Whitehead V, Whitney J, Whittaker S, Whittam B, Whitworth V, Wight A, Wild J, Wilkins M, Wilkinson D, Williams N, Williams N, Williams J, Williams-Howard SA, Willicombe M, Willis G, Willoughby J, Wilson A, Wilson D, Wilson I, Window N, Witham M, Wolf-Roberts R, Wood C, Woodhead F, Woods J, Wormleighton J, Worsley J, Wraith D, Wrey Brown C, Wright C, Wright L, Wright S, Wyles J, Wynter I, Xu M, Yasmin N, Yasmin S, Yates T, Yip KP, Young B, Young S, Young A, Yousuf AJ, Zawia A, Zeidan L, Zhao B, Zongo O. Clinical characteristics with inflammation profiling of long COVID and association with 1-year recovery following hospitalisation in the UK: a prospective observational study. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2022; 10:761-775. [PMID: 35472304 PMCID: PMC9034855 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00127-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 89.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No effective pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions exist for patients with long COVID. We aimed to describe recovery 1 year after hospital discharge for COVID-19, identify factors associated with patient-perceived recovery, and identify potential therapeutic targets by describing the underlying inflammatory profiles of the previously described recovery clusters at 5 months after hospital discharge. METHODS The Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study recruiting adults (aged ≥18 years) discharged from hospital with COVID-19 across the UK. Recovery was assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, physical performance, and organ function at 5 months and 1 year after hospital discharge, and stratified by both patient-perceived recovery and recovery cluster. Hierarchical logistic regression modelling was performed for patient-perceived recovery at 1 year. Cluster analysis was done using the clustering large applications k-medoids approach using clinical outcomes at 5 months. Inflammatory protein profiling was analysed from plasma at the 5-month visit. This study is registered on the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10980107, and recruitment is ongoing. FINDINGS 2320 participants discharged from hospital between March 7, 2020, and April 18, 2021, were assessed at 5 months after discharge and 807 (32·7%) participants completed both the 5-month and 1-year visits. 279 (35·6%) of these 807 patients were women and 505 (64·4%) were men, with a mean age of 58·7 (SD 12·5) years, and 224 (27·8%) had received invasive mechanical ventilation (WHO class 7-9). The proportion of patients reporting full recovery was unchanged between 5 months (501 [25·5%] of 1965) and 1 year (232 [28·9%] of 804). Factors associated with being less likely to report full recovery at 1 year were female sex (odds ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·46-0·99]), obesity (0·50 [0·34-0·74]) and invasive mechanical ventilation (0·42 [0·23-0·76]). Cluster analysis (n=1636) corroborated the previously reported four clusters: very severe, severe, moderate with cognitive impairment, and mild, relating to the severity of physical health, mental health, and cognitive impairment at 5 months. We found increased inflammatory mediators of tissue damage and repair in both the very severe and the moderate with cognitive impairment clusters compared with the mild cluster, including IL-6 concentration, which was increased in both comparisons (n=626 participants). We found a substantial deficit in median EQ-5D-5L utility index from before COVID-19 (retrospective assessment; 0·88 [IQR 0·74-1·00]), at 5 months (0·74 [0·64-0·88]) to 1 year (0·75 [0·62-0·88]), with minimal improvements across all outcome measures at 1 year after discharge in the whole cohort and within each of the four clusters. INTERPRETATION The sequelae of a hospital admission with COVID-19 were substantial 1 year after discharge across a range of health domains, with the minority in our cohort feeling fully recovered. Patient-perceived health-related quality of life was reduced at 1 year compared with before hospital admission. Systematic inflammation and obesity are potential treatable traits that warrant further investigation in clinical trials. FUNDING UK Research and Innovation and National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
|
25
|
An FP, Bai WD, Balantekin AB, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao GF, Cao J, Chang JF, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen HY, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Cheng J, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, Dalager O, Deng FS, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dohnal T, Dolzhikov D, Dove J, Dwyer DA, Gallo JP, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Gu WQ, Guo JY, Guo L, Guo XH, Guo YH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu JR, Hu T, Hu ZJ, Huang HX, Huang JH, Huang XT, Huang YB, Huber P, Jaffe DE, Jen KL, Ji XL, Ji XP, Johnson RA, Jones D, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Langford TJ, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li F, Li HL, Li JJ, Li QJ, Li RH, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu JC, Liu JL, Liu JX, Lu C, Lu HQ, Luk KB, Ma BZ, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Mandujano RC, Marshall C, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nguyen TMT, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Pan HR, Park J, Patton S, Peng JC, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Morales Reveco C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Steiner H, Sun JL, Tmej T, Treskov K, Tse WH, Tull CE, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang J, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wei LH, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Wong HLH, Worcester E, Wu DR, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xie ZQ, Xing ZZ, Xu HK, Xu JL, Xu T, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang YZ, Yao HF, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu HZ, Yu ZY, Yue BB, Zavadskyi V, Zeng S, Zeng Y, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang FY, Zhang HH, Zhang JL, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang SQ, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YY, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao RZ, Zhou L, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. First Measurement of High-Energy Reactor Antineutrinos at Daya Bay. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2022; 129:041801. [PMID: 35939015 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.041801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports the first measurement of high-energy reactor antineutrinos at Daya Bay, with nearly 9000 inverse beta decay candidates in the prompt energy region of 8-12 MeV observed over 1958 days of data collection. A multivariate analysis is used to separate 2500 signal events from background statistically. The hypothesis of no reactor antineutrinos with neutrino energy above 10 MeV is rejected with a significance of 6.2 standard deviations. A 29% antineutrino flux deficit in the prompt energy region of 8-11 MeV is observed compared to a recent model prediction. We provide the unfolded antineutrino spectrum above 7 MeV as a data-based reference for other experiments. This result provides the first direct observation of the production of antineutrinos from several high-Q_{β} isotopes in commercial reactors.
Collapse
|