Circulating Tumor DNA-Guided De-Escalation Targeted Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Uninterrupted targeted therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects is currently the routine therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving driver gene variations. However, drug resistance is inevitable.

Objective

To assess the clinical feasibility of adaptive de-escalation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment guided by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for achieving complete remission after local consolidative therapy (LCT) in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective nonrandomized trial was conducted at a single center from June 3, 2020, to July 19, 2022, and included 60 patients with advanced NSCLC with driver variations without radiologically detectable disease after TKI and LCT. The median (range) follow-up time was 19.2 (3.8-29.7) months. Data analysis was conducted from December 15, 2022, to May 10, 2023.

Intervention

Cessation of TKI treatment and follow-up every 3 months. Treatment was restarted in patients with progressive disease (defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria), detectable ctDNA, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, whichever manifested first, and treatment ceased if all indicators were negative during follow-up surveillance.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were objective response rate, time to next treatment, and overall survival.

Results

Among the total study sample of 60 participants (median [range] age, 55 [21-75] years; 33 [55%] were female), the median PFS was 18.4 (95% CI, 12.6-24.2) months and the median (range) total treatment break duration was 9.1 (1.5-28.1) months. Fourteen patients (group A) remained in TKI cessation with a median (range) treatment break duration of 20.3 (6.8-28.1) months; 31 patients (group B) received retreatment owing to detectable ctDNA and/or CEA and had a median PFS of 20.2 (95% CI, 12.9-27.4) months with a median (range) total treatment break duration of 8.8 (1.5-20.6) months; and 15 patients (group C) who underwent retreatment with TKIs due to progressive disease had a median PFS of 5.5 (95% CI, 1.5-7.2) months. For all participants, the TKI retreatment response rate was 96%, the median time to next treatment was 29.3 (95% CI, 25.3-35.2) months, and the data for overall survival were immature.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this nonrandomized trial suggest that this adaptive de-escalation TKI strategy for patients with NSCLC is feasible in those with no lesions after LCT and a negative ctDNA test result. This might provide a de-escalation treatment strategy guided by ctDNA for the subset of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03046316.

Redoxhigh phenotype mediated by KEAP1/STK11/SMARCA4/NRF2 mutations diminishes tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells and attenuates the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

Metabolism reprogramming within the tumor microenvironment (TME) can have a profound impact on immune cells. Identifying the association between metabolic phenotypes and immune cells in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) may reveal mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Metabolic phenotypes were classified by expression of metabolic genes. Somatic mutations and transcriptomic features were compared across the different metabolic phenotypes. The metabolic phenotype of LUAD is predominantly determined by reductase-oxidative activity and is divided into two categories: redoxhigh LUAD and redoxlow LUAD. Genetically, redoxhigh LUAD is mainly driven by mutations in KEAP1, STK11, NRF2, or SMARCA4. These mutations are more prevalent in redoxhigh LUAD (72.5%) compared to redoxlow LUAD (17.4%), whereas EGFR mutations are more common in redoxlow LUAD (19.0% vs. 0.7%). Single-cell RNA profiling of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples from patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy revealed that tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells are responders to ICIs. However, these cells are significantly reduced in redoxhigh LUAD. The redoxhigh phenotype is primarily attributed to tumor cells and is positively associated with mTORC1 signaling. LUAD with the redoxhigh phenotype demonstrates a lower response rate (39.1% vs. 70.8%, p = 0.001), shorter progression-free survival (3.3 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.004), and overall survival (12.1 vs. 31.2 months, p = 0.022) when treated with ICIs. The redoxhigh phenotype in LUAD is predominantly driven by mutations in KEAP1, STK11, NRF2, and SMARCA4. This phenotype diminishes the number of tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells and attenuates the efficacy of ICIs.

Correlation of distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota with the efficacy of immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been studied. However, their effects on EGFR-mutated (EGFR +) NSCLC remain unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC and assessed potential associations between the use of antibiotics or probiotics and immunotherapy efficacy. Fecal samples were collected at baseline, early on-treatment, response and progression status and were subjected to metagenomic next-generation sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses to assess the effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on immunotherapy efficacy.

RESULTS

The clinical data of 74 advanced EGFR + NSCLC patients were complete and 18 patients' fecal samples were dynamically collected. Patients that used antibiotics had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS, 4.8 vs. 6.7 months; P = 0.037); probiotics had no impact on PFS. Two dynamic types of gut microbiota during immunotherapy were identified: one type showed the lowest relative abundance at the response time point, whereas the other type showed the highest abundance at the response time point. Metabolomics revealed significant differences in metabolites distribution between responders and non-responders. Deoxycholic acid, glycerol, and quinolinic acid were enriched in responders, whereas L-citrulline was enriched in non-responders. There was a significant correlation between gut microbiota and metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotics weakens immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC. The distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota and metabolites may indicate the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced EGFR + NSCLC.

Allelic Context of EGFR C797X-Mutant Lung Cancer Defines Four Subtypes With Heterogeneous Genomic Landscape and Distinct Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

EGFR C797X (C797S or C797G) mutation is the most frequent on-target mechanism of resistance to osimertinib. The hypothesis that the allelic context of C797X/T790M has implications for treatment is on the basis of sporadic reports and needs validation with larger cohorts.

METHODS

We identified patients with EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC from nine centers who progressed on osimertinib, all analyzed in a single laboratory through next-generation sequencing. We analyzed genomic profiles and assessed associations between clinical outcomes and C797X status.

RESULTS

A total of 365 EGFR C797X-mutant cases were categorized into four subtypes on the basis of allelic context: in cis (75.3%), in trans (6.4%), cis&trans (10.4%), and C797X-only (7.9%). Genomically, the cis&trans subtype displayed the highest frequency of concurrent alterations at osimertinib resistance sites (21.1%), while the in cis subtype had the lowest (8.4%). Clinically, cis&trans patients exhibited the worst progression-free survival (PFS) on both previous (median 7.7 mo) and subsequent treatment (median 1.0 mo) and overall survival (median 3.9 mo). In subsequent treatments, in cis patients exhibited superior PFS with combined brigatinib and cetuximab (median 11.0 mo) compared with other regimens (p = 0.005), while in trans patients exhibited variable outcomes with combined first or second- and third-generation EGFR inhibitor (PFS range: 0.7-8.1 mo, median 2.6 mo). Notably, subtype switching was observed after subsequent treatments, predominantly toward the in cis subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Allelic context could define four EGFR C797X-mutant NSCLC subtypes with heterogeneous genetic landscapes and distinct clinical outcomes. Subsequent treatments further complicate the scenario through subtype switching.

PD-L1 expression guidance on sintilimab versus pembrolizumab with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy in untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (CTONG1901): A phase 2, randomized, controlled trial

No direct comparison has been performed between different programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The feasibility of using PD-L1-expression-guided immunotherapy remains unknown. In this open-label, phase 2 study (NCT04252365), patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized (1:1) to receive sintilimab or pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%), or sintilimab or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PD-L1 expression < 50%). The sample size was calculated by optimal two-stage design. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The study included 71 patients (sintilimab arms, n = 35; pembrolizumab arms, n = 36) and met its primary endpoint, with a confirmed ORR of 51.4% (18/35) in the sintilimab arms. The confirmed ORR (95% confidence interval) was 46.2% (19.2%, 74.9%) and 42.9% (17.7%, 71.1%) for patients treated with sintilimab and pembrolizumab monotherapy; and 54.5% (32.2%, 75.6%) and 45.4% (24.4%, 67.8%) for those treated with sintilimab- and pembrolizumab-based combination therapies. The median progression-free survival was 6.9 versus 8.1 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients, respectively, in which it was 7.6 versus 11.0 months in monotherapy and 7.4 versus 7.1 months in combination therapies. The median overall survival was 14.9 versus 21.3 months for all sintilimab-treated versus all pembrolizumab-treated patients, respectively, in which it was 14.9 versus 22.6 months in monotherapy and 14.7 versus 17.3 months in combination therapies. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with safety outcomes of monotherapy and combination therapy in previous phase III studies. However, the incidence of rash was higher with sintilimab than pembrolizumab monotherapy. This is the first prospective phase 2 study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC. Sintilimab was efficacious and well-tolerated irrespective of PD-L1 expression level in patients with advanced NSCLC and had similar efficacy and safety to pembrolizumab.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy based on PD-L1 expression in resectable NSCLC (CTONG1804): a multicenter open-label phase II study

This prospective multicenter phase II study evaluated the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab-exclusive (N) and nivolumab-chemotherapy (N/C) combinations based on PD-L1 expression. Eligible patients exhibited resectable clinical stage IIA-IIIB (AJCC 8th edition) NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations. Patients received either mono-nivolumab (N) or nivolumab + nab-paclitaxel+ carboplatin (N/C) for three cycles based on PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR). Key secondary endpoints included the pathologic complete response (pCR), objective response rate (ORR), and event-free survival (EFS). Baseline PD-L1 expression and perioperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status were correlated with pCR and EFS. Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with 46 undergoing surgeries. The MPR was 50.0% (26/52), with 25.0% (13/52) achieving pCR, and 16.7% and 66.7% for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% in N and N/C groups, respectively. Thirteen (25.0%) patients experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment. Patients with post-neoadjuvant ctDNA negativity was more likely to have pCR (39.1%) compared with those remained positive (6.7%, odds ratio = 6.14, 95% CI 0.84-Inf, p = 0.077). With a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the 18-month EFS rate was 64.8% (95% CI 51.9-81.0%). For patients with ctDNA- vs. ctDNA + , the 18m-EFS rate was 93.8% vs 47.3% (HR, 0.15; 95% CI 0.04, 0.94; p = 0.005). Immunochemotherapy may serve as an optimal neoadjuvant treatment even for patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. ctDNA negativity following neoadjuvant treatment and surgery could help identify superior pathological and survival benefits, which requires further confirmation in a prospective clinical trial (NCT04015778).

Dynamic circulating tumor DNA during chemoradiotherapy predicts clinical outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

The value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains unclear but is critical for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD). In this prospective study, we sequenced 761 blood samples from 139 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). ctDNA concentrations showed a significantly declining trend as CRT progressed at on-RT and after-RT time points versus baseline. Thirty-eight (27.3%) patients with early undetectable ctDNA at both on-RT (RT reached 40 Gy) and after-RT time points, indicating early response to CRT, had better survival outcomes for both with or without consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors. Longitudinal undetectable MRD was found in 20.1% patients. The 2-year cancer-specific progression-free survival of these patients was 88.4%, corresponding to a potentially cured population. Further analysis revealed that pretreatment ctDNA variants serve as an essential MRD informed source. These data provide clinical insights for ctDNA-MRD detection.

First-line pyrotinib in advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a patient-centric phase 2 trial

To explore targeted treatment options in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare genetic mutations in the context of a patient-centric clinical trial, we initiated, in parallel, a phase 2 adaptive umbrella trial consisting of a criteria-fulfilled (CF) cohort and a compassionate use (CU) cohort under expanded eligibility criteria, and a prospective real-world study (RWS). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from 48 patients with treatment-naive, advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with the pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib (CF and CU cohorts) or physician's therapy of choice (RWS cohort). In the phase 2 trial CF cohort (n = 28), the primary endpoint was reached with an objective response rate of 35.7% after pyrotinib treatment. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (89.3%), median progression-free survival (PFS) (7.3 months), median overall survival (OS) (14.3 months) and toxicity, which was acceptable, with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in three patients (10.7%). The phase 2 trial CU cohort (n = 12) showed an objective response rate of 16.7%, disease control rate of 83.4%, median PFS of 4.7 months and median OS of 14.2 months after pyrotinib treatment. The RWS cohort (n = 8) had no responses to physician's therapy of choice, while median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 12.2 months, respectively. Phase 2 umbrella trial, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03574402 . RWS, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03605602 .

T lymphocytes expressing the switchable chimeric Fc receptor CD64 exhibit augmented persistence and antitumor activity

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy lacks persistent efficacy with "on-target, off-tumor" toxicities for treating solid tumors. Thus, an antibody-guided switchable CAR vector, the chimeric Fc receptor CD64 (CFR64), composed of a CD64 extracellular domain, is designed. T cells expressing CFR64 exert more robust cytotoxicity against cancer cells than CFR T cells with high-affinity CD16 variant (CD16v) or CD32A as their extracellular domains. CFR64 T cells also exhibit better long-term cytotoxicity and resistance to T cell exhaustion compared with conventional CAR T cells. With trastuzumab, the immunological synapse (IS) established by CFR64 is more stable with lower intensity induction of downstream signaling than anti-HER2 CAR T cells. Moreover, CFR64 T cells exhibit fused mitochondria in response to stimulation, while CARH2 T cells contain predominantly punctate mitochondria. These results show that CFR64 T cells may serve as a controllable engineered T cell therapy with prolonged persistence and long-term antitumor activity.

Genomic and immune characteristics of HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy

The efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains incomprehensively studied. A total of 107 NSCLC patients with de novo HER2 mutations were retrospectively studied at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute [GLCI cohort, exon 20 insertions (ex20ins): 71.0%], to compare clinical/molecular features and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy efficacy between patients with exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) and non-ex20ins. Two external cohorts (TCGA, n=21; META-ICI, n=30) were used for validation. In the GLCI cohort, 68.2% of patients displayed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <1%. Compared to ex20ins patients, non-ex20ins patients had more concurrent mutations in the GLCI cohort (P<0.01) and a higher tumor mutation burden in the TCGA cohort (P=0.03). Under ICI-based therapy, advanced NSCLC patients with non-ex20ins had potentially superior progression-free survival [median: 13.0 vs 3.6 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.83] and overall survival (median: 27.5 vs. 8.1 months, adjusted HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-1.18) to ex20ins patients, consistent with findings in the META-ICI cohort. ICI-based therapy may serve as an option for advanced HER2-mutated NSCLC, with potentially better efficacy in non-ex20ins patients. Further investigations are warranted in clinical practice.

Circulating tumor cells dynamics during chemotherapy predict survival and response in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Background

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic biomarker in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CTCs could also be used as predictor of efficacy of systemic treatments in advanced NSCLC.

Objectives

We described the dynamic changes of CTCs during first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC and clarified the correlation between CTC counts and efficacy of chemotherapy.

Design

Chemotherapy is administered and blood specimens are collected at four time points from baseline to disease progression for CTC detection.

Methods

This multicenter prospective study enrolled patients with previously untreated stage III or IV NSCLC fit for standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Bloods were sampled as per standard operating procedures at baseline, cycle 1 and cycle 4 of chemotherapy, and at disease progression for CTC analysis using the CellSearch system.

Results

Among 150 patients enrolled, median overall survival (OS) was 13.8, 8.4, and 7.9 months in patients with CTC^-, KIT^-CTC, and KIT⁺CTC at baseline (p = 0.002). Patients with persistent negative CTC (46.0%) had longer progression-free survival [5.7 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-6.5 versus 3.0 months, 0.6-5.4; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.67) and OS (13.1 months, 10.9-15.3 versus 5.6 months, 4.1-7.1; HR: 0.17, 0.08-0.36) compared with patients with persistent positive CTC (10.7%), which was not impacted by chemotherapy. Chemotherapy decreased CTC from 36.0% (54/150) to 13.7% (13/95).

Conclusions

CTC persistent presence during treatment represents poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy could effectively eliminate CTCs. Molecular characterization and the functionalization of CTC will be warranted for further intensive investigation.

Trial registration

NCT01740804.

Overall survival with circulating tumor DNA-guided therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing guides therapy decisions but has been studied mostly in small cohorts without sufficient follow-up to determine its influence on overall survival. We prospectively followed an international cohort of 1,127 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and ctDNA-guided therapy. ctDNA detection was associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-2.42; P < 0.001) independently of clinicopathologic features and metabolic tumor volume. Among the 722 (64%) patients with detectable ctDNA, 255 (23%) matched to targeted therapy by ctDNA sequencing had longer survival than those not treated with targeted therapy (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < 0.001). Genomic alterations in ctDNA not detected by time-matched tissue sequencing were found in 25% of the patients. These ctDNA-only alterations disproportionately featured subclonal drivers of resistance, including RICTOR and PIK3CA alterations, and were associated with short survival. Minimally invasive ctDNA profiling can identify heterogeneous drivers not captured in tissue sequencing and expand community access to life-prolonging therapy.

Biomarker-Driven Studies With Multi-targets and Multi-drugs by Next-Generation Sequencing for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Open-Label, Multi-center, Phase II Adaptive Umbrella Trial and a Real-World Observational Study (CTONG1702&CTONG1705)

BACKGROUND

With rare genetic variations having been increasingly recognized at a preclinical stage, a variety of early-phase clinical trials have been launched. Due to the low incidence rate of these variations, although the sample size of trials are small, it still needs a large number of patients for screening. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), multiple genetic variations can be detected simultaneously. Multiple biomarkers and agents can be evaluated using umbrella clinical trials, which rapidly and effectively screen and enroll patients for parallel sub-studies using NGS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We designed an open-label, multi-center, phase II clinical trial CTONG1702. This is an adaptive umbrella trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of several biomarker-driven agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and a PD-1 inhibitor, in stage IIIB to IV patients (eighth AJCC) with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients will be enrolled in parallel sub-studies based on the results of NGS and PD-L1 IHC analysis. Patients who are not eligible for CTONG1702 will be enrolled in the observational real-world study CTONG1705. This study aims to develop a large-scale genomic database and explore the relationship between genetic variations in NSCLC patients and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The adaptive umbrella trial will evaluate multi-targets and multi-drugs in advanced NSCLC patients (CTONG1702). In addition, the simultaneously initiated real-world study will provide additional data for clinical practice (CTONG1705).

PD-1/PD-L1 combined with LAG3 is associated with clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-related, rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) show durable responses in advanced NSCLC. However, their effects and predictive biomarkers in PLELC remain poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 48 metastatic PLELC patients treated with ICI. Pretreated paraffin-embedded specimens (n = 19) were stained for PD-1, PD-L1, LAG3, TIM3, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, FOXP3, and cytokeratin (CK) by multiple immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Next-generation sequencing was performed for 33 PLELC samples. Among patients treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 30), the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS) were 13.3%, 80.0%, 7.7 months, and 24.9 months, respectively. Patients with PD-L1 ≥1% showed a longer PFS (8.4 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.015) relative to those with PD-L1 &lt;1%. Among patients treated with ICI combination therapy (n = 18), ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 27.8%, 100.0%, 10.1 months, and 19.7 months, respectively. Patients with PD-L1 ≥1% showed a significantly superior OS than those with PD-L1 &lt;1% (NA versus 11.7 months, p = 0.001). Among the 19 mIHC patients, those with high PD-1/PD-L1 and LAG3 expression showed a longer PFS (19.0 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.003). ICI also showed promising efficacy for treating metastatic PLELC. PD-L1 may be both predictive of ICI treatment efficacy and prognostic for survival in PLELC. PD-1/PD-L1 combined with LAG3 may serve as a predictor of ICI treatment effectiveness in PLELC. Larger and prospective trials are warranted to validate both ICI activity and predictive biomarkers in PLELC.

This study was partly presented as a poster at the IASLC 20th World Conference on Lung Cancer 2019, 7–10 September 2019, Barcelona, Spain.

Longitudinal Undetectable Molecular Residual Disease Defines Potentially Cured Population in Localized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The efficacy and potential limitations of molecular residual disease (MRD) detection urgently need to be fully elucidated in a larger population of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We enrolled 261 patients with stages I to III NSCLC who underwent definitive surgery, and 913 peripheral blood samples were successfully detected by MRD assay. Within the population, only six patients (3.2%) with longitudinal undetectable MRD recurred, resulting in a negative predictive value of 96.8%. Longitudinal undetectable MRD may define the patients who were cured. The peak risk of developing detectable MRD was approximately 18 months after landmark detection. Correspondingly, the positive predictive value of longitudinal detectable MRD was 89.1%, with a median lead time of 3.4 months. However, brain-only recurrence was less commonly detected by MRD (n = 1/5, 20%). Further subgroup analyses revealed that patients with undetectable MRD might not benefit from adjuvant therapy. Together, these results expound the value of MRD in NSCLC.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study confirms the prognostic value of MRD detection in patients with NSCLC after definitive surgery, especially in those with longitudinal undetectable MRD, which might represent the potentially cured population regardless of stage and adjuvant therapy. Moreover, the risk of developing detectable MRD decreased stepwise after 18 months since landmark detection. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1599.

Sintilimab versus pembrolizumab in monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer: Results from phase 2, randomized clinical trial (CTONG1901)

9032

Background: Immunotherapy has become standard therapy for untreated advanced NSCLC. However, no direct comparison between anti-PD-1 inhibitors has been reported. Methods: CTONG1901 is an open label, randomized, phase II clinical trial to compare sintilimab and pembrolizumab in monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC at first-line setting. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Patient without EGFR and ALK alteration were enrolled. Patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% were randomly to receive sintilimab (A) or pembrolizumab (B) ; and with TPS<50% were randomly to receive sintilimab (C) or pembrolizumab (D) combined with chemotherapy. Sample size was calculated by Optimal Two-Stage Designs. 20 patients were enrolled in 1st stage. When ≥4 patients achieve partial response (PR) in sintilimab arms, the study will enter into 2nd stage and the sample size will be calculated based on the ORR results of the 1st stage. Results: The ORR was 57.1% in sintilimab and 33.3% in pembrolizumab arms at the 1st stage. The study successfully entered into the 2nd stage. 48 additional patients should be enrolled after calculation. When 15 PR in sintilimab arms achieved, the primary endpoint will be reached. From Mar. 2020 to Jan. 2022, 71 patients were screened and 68 patients were enrolled in two stages. Histologic subtypes and brain metastasis were well balanced between arms. As of Dec. 31st 2021, the median follow-up was 5.6 months. The confirmed ORR was 45.5% (15/33) in sintilimab vs. 28.6% (10/35) in pembrolizumab arms (A vs. B: 30.8% [4/13] vs. 28.6% [4/14]; C vs. D: 55.0% [11/20] vs. 28.6% [6/21]). Unconfirmed ORR was 57.6% vs. 42.9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 87.9% vs. 91.4% in sintilimab and pembrolizumab arms. The primary endpoint was reached. Survival data was immature. Any grade and 3-4 grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable in sintilimab and pembrolizumab arms (Table). Conclusions: This is the first head-to-head phase II study to directly compare two anti-PD-1 antibodies as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC. The result suggested comparable tumor response and similar safety profile between sintilimab and pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT04252365. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non–small cell lung cancer harboring ERBB2 exon 20 insertions and non-ERBB2 exon 20 insertions

2591

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have suboptimal efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ERBB2 mutations, including ERBB2 exon 20 insertions. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ICIs and immune characteristics in NSCLC patients harboring ERBB2 ex20ins and non-ex20ins mutations. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients harboring ERBB2 mutations were recruited from January 2016 to December 2020. Pre-ICI tumor tissue samples were collected and performed with targeted next-generation sequencing. Patients received ICIs were followed up every 3 months until November 2021. Genomic features were compared between patients with ERBB2 ex20ins and non-ex20ins mutations. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) features characterized by multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) were further analyzed in patients receiving ICIs. Two-sample T-tests were performed to compare means; Cox models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two external datasets of ERBB2-mutant NSCLC patients, including TCGA (n = 23) and META (n = 33), were used for validation. Results: A total of 117 eligible patients were enrolled (median age: 59 [range: 24-82], males 57.3%, stage IV 68.4%, adenocarcinoma 93.2%), of whom 37 received subsequent ICI treatment. similar PD-L1 tumor proportion score (mean: 8.1% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.25) and significantly lower mutation number (mean: 3.0 vs. 6.2 muts/person, p < 0.01) were detected in patients with ERBB2 ex20ins, compared to patients with ERBB2 mutations other than ex20ins. Similarly, in the TCGA cohort, tumor mutation burden was significantly lower in ERBB2 ex20ins patients (mean: 2.2 vs. 10.3 muts/Mb, p = 0.02). Of 37 patients receiving ICIs, ERBB2 non-ex20ins patients displayed superior PFS (mPFS: 13.5 vs. 4.4 months, HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14-0.71), relatively long OS (mOS: 27.5 vs. 8.1 months, HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.20-1.14), and a relatively high rate of durable clinical benefit (64.3% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.10) than ex20ins patients, consistent with what was observed in the META cohort (PFS, mPFS: 13.2 vs. 2.5 months, HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06-0.68; OS, mOS: 23.3 vs. 8.0 months, HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.90). Moreover, the CD4+ T cell density appeared to be lower in the tumor stroma of ERBB2 ex20ins patients than that of non-ex20ins patients (300.5 vs. 1288.0 /mm2, p = 0.08), even though the general TIME features of ex20ins patients were similar to those of non-ex20ins patients. Conclusions: NSCLC patients carrying ERBB2 ex20ins demonstrated worse clinical outcome under ICI treatment, similar PD-L1 expression and lower mutation number when compared to those with non-ex20ins mutations. Genomic and TIME characteristics should be further investigated to elucidate the efficacy of ICIs in lung cancer patients carrying ERBB2 mutations.

Subsequent treatments beyond progression on osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastases

BACKGROUND

Despite the reported efficacy of osimertinib, central nervous system (CNS) progression is still frequent in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to reveal site-specific resistant mechanisms to osimertinib and investigate subsequent treatments for leptomeningeal metastases (LM).

METHODS

EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM who progressed on osimertinib were included. Molecular analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at osimertinib progression was performed. Subsequent treatments of LM were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were identified. Only those with LM as a progression site on osimertinib were included (n=81). In 58 CSF-plasma pairs, more alterations were uniquely detected in CSF (77%) than in plasma (7%). These mechanisms led to 22 patients receiving matched targeted therapy. Among them, 16 (72.7%) had a clinical response. The median overall survival was 7.2 months. For non-matched therapy (n=59), the osimertinib combination had a longer median overall survival than the regimen switch in CNS-only progression (15.3 vs. 7 months, p=0.03). Finally, serial monitoring by CSF revealed the potential evolution of LM.

CONCLUSIONS

Private resistant mechanisms in CSF might match osimertinib-resistant LM for targeted therapy. Besides, continuing osimertinib with intensification strategy might prolong survival, especially for those with CNS-only progression. Prospective  exploration is needed.

Clinical outcomes of EGFR+/METamp+ vs. EGFR+/METamp- untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

MET dysregulation has been implicated in the development of primary and secondary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations and de novo MET amplifications still need to be explored.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients from our hospital with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations and/or de novo MET amplifications were included in this study. Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank statistics. Lung cancer organoids (LCOs) were generated from patient-derived malignant pleural effusion to perform drug sensitivity assays.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with the appropriate clinicopathological characteristics were enrolled. MET FISH was performed in 40 patients who were stratified accordingly into two groups: EGFR+/METamp- (n = 22) and EGFR+/METamp + (n = 18). Survival rates for EGFR+/METamp- and EGFR+/METamp + patients respectively, were as follows: the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 and 1.9 months (p<0.001); the median post-progression overall survival (pOS) was 25.6 and 11.6 months (p = 0.023); the median overall survival (OS) was 33.2 and 12.7 months (p = 0.013). Drug testing conducted in LCOs derived from malignant pleural effusion from EGFR+/METamp + patients showed that dual targeted therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

EGFR+/METamp + patients treated with first-line TKI monotherapy had poor clinical outcomes. Dual targeted therapy showed potent anticancer activity in the LCO drug testing assay, suggesting that it is a promising first-line treatment for EGFR+/METamp + patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these results.

Three-year follow-up and patient-reported outcomes from CheckMate 078: Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

In the phase 3 CheckMate 078 study, nivolumab prolonged overall survival (OS) and showed a favorable safety profile versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, long-term efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life findings with second-line nivolumab are very limited in Asian patients with previously treated aNSCLC. Here, we report updated clinical data and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the phase 3 CheckMate 078 trial with a 3-year minimum follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with aNSCLC and disease progression after platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival, safety, and disease-related symptom deterioration assessed using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) by Week 12. Additional PRO assessments were exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

At ≥ 37.3 months follow-up, 3-year OS rates were 19% with nivolumab and 12% with docetaxel; 30% and 0% of responders remained in response for ≥ 3 years, respectively. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events occurring after 2 years was lower than during the first 2 years. No new treatment-related deaths were reported. By Week 12 of treatment, rates of disease-related symptom deterioration were 32% with nivolumab and 47% with docetaxel. Completion rates for PRO questionnaires were ≥ 80% in both arms. Clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in LCSS Average Symptom Burden Index scores and delayed time to first symptom deterioration were observed with nivolumab against docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years, nivolumab continued to demonstrate survival benefit versus docetaxel, exhibiting improvements in disease-related symptoms and overall health status in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated aNSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. These findings are similar to the global population.

Clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid-derived circular RNAs in lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases

Background

Free circular RNAs(circRNAs) escaping from primary lesion of cancer to brain are strictly regulated by blood–brain barrier and therefore cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circRNAs have potential advantage in exploring biomarkers and mechanism of brain metastasis in lung cancer.

Methods

We collected paired cerebrospinal fluid, plasma and tumor tissues from 21 lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients with brain metastases (BM) and performed RNA sequencing.

Results

Compared to tumor tissue and plasma, circRNAs in CSF were characterized by lower number of spieces but higher abundance. Notably, CSF-circRNAs displayed high heterogeneity among different BM lung ADC patients. A total of 60 CSF-circRNAs was identified and associated with shorten overall survival. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network analysis revealed that the 60 CSF-circRNAs involved in cancer-associated pathways, and five of them showed strong association with WNT signaling pathway. Validation by RT-PCR of CSF and in vitro experiments of the five candidate circRNAs support their potential roles in cell proliferation and invasion.

Conclusions

In summary, our results depicted the heterogenous CSF-circRNAs profiles among BM lung ADC and implied that CSF-circRNAs may be promising prognosis-related biomarkers.

A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China

Background

Afatinib has been shown as a suitable option for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized controlled trials. However, patients treated in real-world clinical practice, including elderly patients, and those with brain metastases or poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance statuses, are often excluded from these studies.

Objective

To report the final results, with a particular focus on patients enrolled in China, from a prospective phase IIIb, “near real-world” study of afatinib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve Asian patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

NCT01953913 was conducted at 34 centers across Asia. Entry criteria were broad to reflect real-world settings. Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day until tumor progression, lack of clinical benefit, or poor tolerability. Assessments included safety, time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

541 patients were treated, of whom 412 were enrolled in China. Dose reductions were implemented in 28.7% of patients overall, and 17.7% of patients from China. Safety findings were consistent with phase III studies of afatinib. Median TTSP in all patients was 14.0 months (95% CI 12.9–15.9), and median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI 11.0–13.6). Median TTSP (13.8 months, 95% CI 12.7–16.1) and PFS (11.4 months, 95% CI 10.9–13.7) were similar in patients from China to the overall population. Among patients from China who had dose reductions, TTSP was numerically longer than in those who did not (16.4 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0703), while PFS was significantly longer (13.9 vs. 11.1 months; P = 0.0275). Among patients from China with brain metastases, TTSP was numerically shorter than in those without (11.0 vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.0869), whereas PFS was significantly shorter (9.2 vs. 12.9 months; P = 0.0075).

Conclusions

Safety data for afatinib when used in a “near real-world” setting in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC was consistent with the known safety profile of afatinib. Supporting efficacy data of afatinib were provided in all patients, and in those enrolled in China. Tolerability-guided afatinib dose reduction allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit.

Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration

NCT01953913 (1 October 2013).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00859-6.

MET amplification identified by next-generation sequencing and its clinical relevance for MET inhibitors

Background

MET amplification plays an important role in the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) either de novo or in resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) settings. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard method for MET amplification. With more and more discoveries of oncogenic driver genes, next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays a significant role in precision oncology. Meanwhile, the role of NGS in MET amplification remains uncertain.

Methods

Forty patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were included. FISH and NGS were conducted prior to MET inhibitors treatment. MET amplification by FISH was defined as a MET/CEP7 ratio of  >  2.0 and/or copy number (CN)  >  5. MET amplification by NGS was defined as gene copy number (GCN)  ≥  5.

Results

The concordance rate among FISH and NGS was 62.5% (25/40). MET amplification identified by FISH showed the optimal predictive value. The partial response (PR) rate was 68.0% (17/25 with MET amplification) vs. 6.7% (1/15 without MET amplification); the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months versus 1.0 months (P  < 0.001). MET amplification identified by NGS failed to distinguish significant clinical outcomes. The PR rate was 60.0% (6/10, with MET GCN  ≥ 5) vs. 40.0% (12/30, with MET GCN  < 5); the median PFS was 4.8 months vs. 2.2 months (P  = 0.357). The PR rate was 68.8% (11/16) and the median PFS was 4.8 months in patients with focal amplification by NGS.

Conclusions

MET amplification identified by FISH remains the optimal biomarker to identify suitable candidates for MET-TKI therapy. In comparison, amplification identified by NGS seems not as robust to be effective predictive biomarker. Further exploration is needed regarding the focal amplification by NGS in predicting the efficacy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40164-021-00245-y.

Prediction of unfavourable response to checkpoint blockade in lung cancer patients through an integrated tumour-immune expression score

•

Predictive power of PD response for ICIs was superior than traditional biomarkers;

•

Predictive efficacy was improved by integrating tumor-immune-related features;

•

When tumor-specific feature was replaced, the model has pan-cancer applicability.

•

NRAS and PDPK1 have the potential to induce primary resistance to ICIs.

Background

Treatment by immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) provides a remarkable survival benefit for multiple cancer types. However, disease aggravation occurs in a proportion of patients after the first couple of treatment cycles.

Methods

RNA sequencing data was retrospectively collected. 6 tumour-immune related features were extracted and combined to build a lung cancer-specific predictive model to distinguish responses as progression disease (PD) or non-PD. This model was trained by 3 public pan-cancer datasets and a lung cancer cohort from our institute, and generated a lung cancer-specific integrated gene expression score, which we call LITES. It was finally tested in another lung cancer dataset.

Results

LITES is a promising predictor for checkpoint blockade (area under the curve [AUC]=0.86), superior to traditional biomarkers. It is independent of PD-L1 expression and tumour mutation burden. The sensitivity and specificity of LITES was 85.7% and 70.6%, respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) was longer in high-score group than in low-score group (median PFS: 6.0 vs. 2.4 months, hazard ratio=0.45, P=0.01). The mean AUC of 6 features was 0.70 (range=0.61-0.75), lower than in LITES, indicating that the combination of features had synergistic effects. Among the genes identified in the features, patients with high expression of NRAS and PDPK1 tended to have a PD response (P=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Our model also functioned well for patients with advanced melanoma and was specific for ICB therapy.

Conclusions

LITES is a promising biomarker for predicting an impaired response in lung cancer patients and for clarifying the biological mechanism underlying ICB therapy.