Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2024

Introduction

Each year the interdisciplinary AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

The updated evidence-based treatment recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer have been released in March 2024.

Results and Conclusion

This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.

Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab vs De-escalated Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: The Neoadjuvant WSG-TP-II Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Combination of chemotherapy with (dual) ERBB2 blockade is considered standard in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). Despite some promising data on endocrine therapy (ET) combination with dual ERBB2 blockade in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive BC, to our knowledge, no prospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs ET plus ERBB2 blockade in particular with focus on molecular markers has yet been performed.

Objective

To determine whether neoadjuvant de-escalated chemotherapy is superior to endocrine therapy, both in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab, in a highly heterogeneous HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, multicenter, neoadjuvant randomized clinical trial allocated 207 patients with centrally confirmed estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive (>1%) HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC to 12 weeks of standard ET (n = 100) vs paclitaxel (n = 107) plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. A total of 186 patients were required to detect a statistically significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) (assumptions: 19% absolute difference in pCR; power, ≥80%; 1-sided Fisher exact test, 2.5% significance level).

Interventions

Standard ET (aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen) or paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, weekly plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 21 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary end points included safety, translational research, and health-related quality of life. Omission of further chemotherapy was allowed in patients with pCR. PAM50 analysis was performed on baseline tumor biopsies.

Results

Of the 207 patients included (median [range] age, 53 [25-83] years), 121 (58%) had cT2 to cT4 tumors, and 58 (28%) had clinically node-positive EBC. The pCR rate in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm was 23.7% (95% CI, 15.7%-33.4%) vs 56.4% (95% CI, 46.2%-66.3%) in the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46; P < .001). Both immunohistochemical ERBB2 score of 3 or higher and ERBB2-enriched subtype were independent predictors for pCR in both arms. Paclitaxel was superior to ET only in the first through third quartiles but not in the highest ERBB2 quartile by messenger RNA. In contrast with the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm, no decrease in health-related quality of life after 12 weeks was observed in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm.

Conclusions and Relevance

The WSG-TP-II randomized clinical trial is, to our knowledge, the first prospective trial comparing 2 neoadjuvant de-escalation treatments in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC and demonstrated an excellent pCR rate after 12 weeks of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab that was clearly superior to the pCR rate after ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03272477.

Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial

BACKGROUND

In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.

Impact of RNA Signatures on pCR and Survival after 12-Week Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab plus Trastuzumab with or without Paclitaxel in the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- Trial

PURPOSE

To identify associations of biological signatures and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) with pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) and survival in the Phase II WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial (NCT01817452).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HER2+/HR- early breast cancer (EBC) were randomized to pertuzumab+trastuzumab (P+T, n = 92) or P+T+paclitaxel (n = 42). Gene expression signatures were analyzed in baseline biopsies using NanoString Breast Cancer 360 panel (n = 117); baseline and on-treatment (week 3) sTIL levels were available in 119 and 76 patients, respectively. Impacts of standardized gene expression signatures on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were estimated by logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

In all patients, ERBB2 [OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.67] and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.61) were favorable, whereas PTEN (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87) was unfavorable for pCR. After 60 months median follow-up, 13 invasive events occurred (P+T: n = 11, P+T+paclitaxel: n = 2), none following pCR. Gene signatures related to immune response (IR) and ER signaling were favorable for iDFS, all with similar HR about 0.43-0.55. These patterns were even more prominent in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free group, where additionally BRCAness signature was unfavorable (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.84). IR signatures were strongly intercorrelated. sTILs (baseline/week 3/change) were not associated with pCR or iDFS, though baseline sTILs correlated positively with IR signatures.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct gene signatures were associated with pCR versus iDFS in HER2+/HR- EBC. The potential role of IR in preventing recurrence suggests that patients with upregulated IR signatures could be candidates for de-escalation concepts in HER2+ EBC.

De-escalated Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Impact of Molecular Markers and Final Survival Analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial

PURPOSE

Although optimal treatment in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear, de-escalated chemotherapy appears to be an option in selected patients within this aggressive subtype. Previous studies have identified several pro-immune factors as prognostic markers in TNBC, but their predictive impact regarding different chemotherapy strategies is still controversial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ADAPT-TN is a randomized neoadjuvant multicenter phase II trial in early patients with TNBC (n = 336) who were randomized to 12 weeks of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine or carboplatin d 1,8 q3w. Omission of further (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed only in patients with pathological complete response [pCR, primary endpoint (ypT0/is, ypN0)]. Secondary invasive/distant disease-free and overall survival (i/dDFS, OS) and translational research objectives included quantification of a predictive impact of markers regarding selection for chemotherapy de-escalation, measured by gene expression of 119 genes (including PAM50 subtype) by nCounter platform and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL).

RESULTS

After 60 months of median follow-up, 12-week-pCR was favorably associated (HR, 0.24; P = 0.001) with 5y-iDFS of 90.6% versus 62.8%. No survival advantage of carboplatin use was observed, despite a higher pCR rate [HR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.59]. Additional anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was not associated with a significant iDFS advantage in pCR patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.41-4.02). Beyond pCR rate, nodal status and high sTILs were independently associated with better iDFS, dDFS, and OS by multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Short de-escalated neoadjuvant taxane/platinum-based combination therapy appears to be a promising strategy in early TNBC for using pCR rate as an early decision point for further therapy (de-) escalation together with node-negative status and high sTILs. See related commentary by Sharma, p. 4840.

Concordance and clinical impact of ER, PR, HER2 expression by local and central immunohistochemistry versus RT-PCR in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC): Results from the ADAPT trial

536

Background: We evaluated concordance of ER, PR and HER2 status between local, central, and RT-PCR/mRNA assessments and its clinical impact in the ADAPT trial collective in HR+ HER2- EBC (NCT01779206). Particularly, validity of borderline ER-positivity (expression level 1-10%) has great clinical relevance as treatment concepts between luminal-like and triple negative (TNBC) EBC differ substantially. Methods: Patients (pts) with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (ER and/or PR >1%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of endocrine therapy (ET) before surgery or sequential core biopsy (CB) and then allocated to an ET-alone or chemotherapy (ET) trial, depending on risk and endocrine response. OncotypeDX (incl. RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2) and central IHC for ER, PR, HER2 were performed on the initial 1.CB. ER-low cohort was defined as 1-10% expression by local OR central lab (ASCO-CAP). Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios. Results: In ADAPT, 5149 pts from 81 centers in Germany with locally ER and/or PR positive (known quantitative levels) EBC were screened 2012-2018. Median follow-up was 59 months. For ER (positive vs. negative), overall concordance measured as agreement (κ) was high between all three assessments: Local vs. central IHC: 99.3% (κ = 0.45), RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 99% (κ = 0.48). Concordance was lower for PR: RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 90.5% (κ = 0.58), local vs. central IHC: 93.1% (κ = 0.56). 3% were centrally found as HER2+ in 1.CB (73% of them were negative by RT-PCR) and/or 2. Sample. Regarding HER2-low status (1+ or 2+ but ISH negative), concordance between local and central IHC was only 53.8% (κ = 0.09). Of all pts, only 2% (n=109; n=85 with both measurements available) had low ER expression (1-10%) by either local or central pathology. Only 9 of them were concordantly identified as ER-low (11%); 8/58 (14%) ER-low by local lab had TNBC by central lab. 17/47 ER-low cases (36.2%) with known post-endocrine Ki67post had Ki67post <10% vs. 59.7% in ER>10%. 41.8% of ER-low cases had RS<25 vs. 76.7% in ER>10%. All cases with ER <10% by both assessments and those with Ki-67≥40% had RS >25. We observed worse iDFS (HR 1.91, p=0.034) in the ER-low group vs. ER>10%. Conclusions: Although we have confirmed high agreement between local and central IHC and RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2 assessment in locally HR+/HER2- EBC, there are still a few clinically relevant discordances. Regarding HER2-low status, standardization and quality assurance are needed if this becomes clinically relevant. Treatment of the heterogeneous ER-low group as TNBC appears reasonable only if “ER-low” is confirmed by a second assessment and in cases with Ki-67>40%. Preoperative ET response assessment may be helpful if an endocrine-based therapy concept is intended. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.

Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: ADAPTcycle

TPS609

Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program focusses on individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in EBC in a subtype-specific manner. Clinical feasibility of the WSG ADAPT trial goals - early response assessment and subtype-specific therapy tailoring to those patients (pts) who are most likely to benefit - has recently been confirmed by the 5-years survival data of the ADAPT HR+/HER2- clinical trial. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT04055493) investigating whether treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (600mg/day) together with ET is superior to standard-chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Definition of intermediate-risk is either based on Oncotype DX and endocrine responder status (measured by Ki67-response after 2-4 weeks of induction endocrine therapy (ET)) or on low-intermediate baseline Ki67 and high estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-expression (Dowsett et al. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020). Co-primary endpoints are DFS and dDFS. It is planned to screen 5600 pts and to randomize 1670 pts (1002 to ribociclib + ET; 668 to standard CT followed by ET). Study start was in July 2019 (88 sites, enrollment period 42 months) and until date of submission, 3079 pts have been screened and 811 randomized (490 ribociclib / 321 CT). Pre-/postmenopausal pts with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC with high clinical risk (cT2-4 or Ki-67 20% or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfil the ADAPT intermediate-risk criteria: Recurrence Score (RS) ≤25 plus several risk factors and poor ET responder, RS >25 and ET-responder in p/cN0-1 pts, or RS ≤25 with c/pN2-3 in ET-responder. Direct randomization of premenopausal patients (irrespective of ET-response) with c/pN0 and RS 16-25 or c/pN1 with RS 0-25 is allowed according to investigator´s decision; however, based on the ADAPT results, ET+ovarian function suppression alone is strongly recommended in ET-responders. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) (premenopausal: AI + GnRH)-arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT-arm; neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment is allowed. The minimum 5-year follow-up phase includes standard adjuvant ET. ePROs are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel eHealth method. Translational analyses: Tumor tissue will be collected prior to ET, after at least 3 weeks of ET, if residual tumor is diagnosed (neoadjuvant treatment), and at recurrence, to identify potential resistance markers. Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers. In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04055493.

Immune Markers and Tumor-Related Processes Predict Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in the WSG-ADAPT HER2-Positive/Hormone Receptor-Positive Trial in Early Breast Cancer

Prognostic or predictive biomarkers in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) may inform treatment optimization. The ADAPT HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive phase II trial (NCT01779206) demonstrated pathological complete response (pCR) rates of ~40% following de-escalated treatment with 12 weeks neoadjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) ± endocrine therapy. In this exploratory analysis, we evaluated potential early predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy. The effects of PIK3CA mutations and immune (CD8 and PD-L1) and apoptotic markers (BCL2 and MCL1) on pCR rates were assessed, along with intrinsic BC subtypes. Immune response and pCR were lower in PIK3CA-mutated tumors compared with wildtype. Increased BCL2 at baseline in all patients and at Cycle 2 in the T-DM1 arms was associated with lower pCR. In the T-DM1 arms only, the HER2-enriched subtype was associated with increased pCR rate (54% vs. 28%). These findings support further prospective pCR-driven de-escalation studies in patients with HER2-positive EBC.

Prognostic impact of recurrence score, endocrine response and clinical-pathological factors in high-risk luminal breast cancer: Results from the WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- chemotherapy trial

504

Background: In HR+/HER2- N0-1 early BC, postmenopausal patients (pts) with RS™ > 25 and a substantial proportion of premenopausal pts seem to benefit from addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) to endocrine therapy (ET). However, the magnitude of absolute benefit from this treatment intensification seems to depend on clinical-pathological and biological prognostic factors. For the first time, we present outcome from the CT part of the prospective phase III WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER- trial combining both static (RS in baseline core biopsy (CB) and dynamic (Ki67 response) biomarkers to optimize adjuvant therapy in luminal EBC. Methods: Pts with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (cT2-4 OR clinically N+ OR G3 OR Ki67>15%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of standard ET (postmenopausal: mostly AI; premenopausal: TAM) before surgery or sequential CB. Pts with cN2-3 or G3/Ki67>40% were randomized directly to the CT trial. pN0-1 pts with RS0-11 OR RS12-25/ET-response (central Ki67postendocrine<10%) received ET alone; the remaining high-risk cohort was randomized to the CT trial: (neo)adjuvant dose-dense CT (4xPaclitaxelà4xEC q2w vs. 8xNab-Paclitaxel q1wà4xEC q2w) followed by ET. Primary endpoint is efficacy comparison of CT schedules for survival; secondary endpoints reported here involve impacts of key prognostic factors on survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival curves and hazard ratios. For this analysis, subgroups free of selection bias by RS/ET-response were defined. Results: 5625 pts were screened and 4621 (ITT) entered the trial. After 4.9y median follow-up, higher baseline and post-endocrine Ki-67 levels were associated with poorer iDFS (both p < 0.001). In the CT cohort (n = 2331), higher RS, nodal status, and tumor size were generally associated with poorer iDFS. However, iDFS differed between N1 and N0 status only among younger pts (<50 years). In pts with >4 positive LN (n = 390), lower RS was associated with improved iDFS (RS0-11 vs RS > 25: plog-rank= 0.016, 5y-iDFS 90% vs. 64%). In pts with RS > 25 (n = 965), low Ki67postendocrine, N0 status, and c/pT1 status were associated with improved iDFS. In particular, ET-responders had higher 5y-iDFS (84%) than ET-non-responders (77%; plog-rank= 0.040). Younger patients (<50 years old) with N0-1 RS 12-25/ ET-non-responders treated by CT had non-significantly poorer 5-year iDFS (89%) compared to those with ET-response treated by ET only (92%) (plog-rank= 0.249). Conclusion: First results from the prospective high risk cohort from a large prospective phase III ADAPT trial provide evidence for good prognosis in some pts with >4 positive LN and e.g. low RS. Moreover combination of lower post-endocrine Ki-67 and limited tumor burden may be a promising criterion for CT de-escalation strategies even in patients with high RS. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.

Pathological complete response rate and survival in patients with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer after 12 weeks of de-escalated neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Translational results of the WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial (NCT01815242)

579

Background: The phase II trial WSG-ADAPT TN randomized triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients to receive 12 weeks of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac) combined with carboplatin (carbo) vs gemcitabine (gem) and showed a substantial improvement of pathological complete response (pCR: ypT0/is, ypN0) with carbo (45.9% vs 28.7%). pCR had a strong favorable impact on iDFS after 3-year follow-up. Distribution of tumor mutations in BC-associated genes and impact of BRCA mutation status on pCR and outcome are analyzed here. Methods: NGS-based mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 and 18 further (potentially) BC-associated genes was performed on DNA derived from pretreatment FFPE samples (gem: n = 158, carbo: n = 108) using a customized gene panel. Variants with a variant fraction of ≥5% were included and classified according to IARC and ENIGMA guidelines. Results: In 42 of the 266 analyzed samples, at least one deleterious BRCA1/2-variant was found (15.8%; BRCA1 n = 37, BRCA2 n = 3, BRCA1+ BRCA2 n = 2) one of which displayed an additional STK11-mutation. In the BRCA1/2-negative cohort, a mutation in one of 14 further analyzed (potential) BC-risk genes was found in 19 samples (7.1%; BARD1 n = 3, CHEK2 n = 2, CDH1 n = 2, FANCM n = 3, PALB2 n = 5, RAD50 n = 1, RAD51C n = 1, RAD51D n = 1, XRCC2 n = 1; no deleterious mutations were found in ATM, BRIP1, MRE11A, NBN). At least one deleterious variant in TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN or MAP3K1 was seen in 89.1% (n = 237; TP53 n = 233, PIK3CA n = 22 PTEN n = 15, MAP3K1 n = 1). In 22 samples (8.3%) no deleterious mutation was identified in the analyzed genes. Overall, patients with tumor BRCA mutation (carbo n = 14, gem n = 28) had 45.2% vs 34.4% pCR (OR = 1.58, 95%-CI: 0.81-3.07, p =.18) without a mutation. pCR in the small group with mutation receiving carbo (n = 14) was 64.3% vs. 34.5% in all others (OR = 3.41, 95%-CI: 1.11-10.50; p =.03); direct comparison to BRCA-positive patients receiving gem (n = 28, 35.7%, OR = 3.2, 95%-CI: 0.85-12.36, p = 0.079) did not reach statistical significance. The results suggest that the strong favorable impact of pCR on iDFS is preserved even among BRCA-positive patients (n = 42, p =.07), as well as in the BRCA-negative subgroup (p <.001). No evidence for a predictive impact of BRCA mutation on efficacy of 4xEC additional chemotherapy was seen overall or within pCR subgroups. Conclusions: Twelve weeks of neoadjuvant nab-pac/carbo is a highly effective anthracycline-free regimen that leads to an excellent pCR-rate of 64% in tumor BRCA1/2-mutated cases. BRC A1/2 mutation status could support this de-escalation strategy in early TNBC, but further prospective validation of survival impacts in larger cohorts and with longer follow up is needed. More detailed survival analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01815242.

De-escalated neoadjuvant pertuzumab+trastuzumab with or without paclitaxel weekly in HR-/HER2+ early breast cancer: ADAPT-HR-/HER2+ biomarker and survival results

503

Background: Optimal use of de-escalated, particularly chemotherapy(CT)-free, neoadjuvant regimens in HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) is currently unclear as there are limited survival data so far. In ADAPT-HR-/HER2+, we previously showed an excellent pCR rate of 90% after 12-week neoadjuvant paclitaxel (Pac) +pertuzumab (P) +trastuzumab (T) and a substantial and clinically meaningful pCR rate of 34% after P+T alone in HR-/HER2+ EBC. Here, we present first survival data. Methods: The prospective multicenter WSG-ADAPT-HR-/HER2+ phase II-trial is part of the ADAPT-umbrella protocol. Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HR-/HER2+ EBC (n = 134) were randomized to 4 cycles of P+T +/- pac d1,8,15 q3w. All tumors were HR-negative (ER and PR < 1%) and HER2-positive (central lab, i.e., 2+ FISH positive or 3+ by immunohistochemistry. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0); omission of further CT was allowed in pts with pCR. Trial objective was to compare pCR in P+T+pac arm vs. early responders in P+T arm (defined as low cellularity and/or Ki67 decrease >30% after 3 weeks). The trial was stopped early due to the observed pCR superiority in the P+T+pac arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, 5-y (distant)-DFS, OS and translational research. Cox-regression analysis was applied. PAM50 subtype was assessed using the BC360 panel. Results: 134 patients were randomized to P+T (n = 92) or P+T+pac (n = 42). 60% of tumors were cT2-4, 42% clinically node-positive. After a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences between study arms were observed regarding DFS, dDFS, and OS; only 13 iDFS events (7 dDFS) were observed in the whole ITT population. pCR (vs. non-pCR) after the 12-week study treatment (irrespective of study arm) was strongly associated with improved iDFS (5y DFS 98.5% vs. 82%, HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64). Of the 69 patients with pCR, 39 (56.5%) received no further CT (P+T arm: n = 9, 29% vs. (P+T+pac arm n = 30, 79%); only 1 distant relapse (1.4%) was observed in these patients. In the CT-free P+T arm, no pCR was observed in patients with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+/2+ and FISH positive) and/or basal-like subtype by PAM50 (n = 17, 19%). In the total study population, low HER2 expression and/or no early response was strongly associated with worse dDFS (p =.029) and iDFS (p =.068). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: For the first time, we have shown both excellent pCR and survival in patients treated by de-escalated neoadjuvant CT+P+T irrespective of further CT use in a prospective multicenter study. Investigation of CT-free regimens may need to be focussed on selected patients only (e.g. with high HER2 expression/non-basal-like tumors). In ADAPT HR-/HER2+, early pCR after only 12 weeks of neoadjuvant P+T+pac was strongly associated with improved outcome and may thus serve as a predictive clinical marker for further treatment (de)-escalation. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.

ADAPTlate: A randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III trial on adjuvant dynamic marker—Adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high-risk, HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

TPS598

Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program addresses the individualization of (neo)adj. decision-making in EBC. The ADAPT umbrella trial established early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a 3-wk endocrine treatment (ET) to omit chemotherapy (CT) in a cohort of early high-risk HR+/HER2- pts. ADAPTlate seeks to improve adj. therapy for pts. at high risk for late disease recurrence, who completed definite locoregional therapy (with / without (neo-)adj. CT) and are under adj. ET. This high-risk population does not derive optimal benefit from standard ET, develops secondary ET resistance, and late recurrences. Methods: Prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open, randomized, controlled adj. phase III trial (NCT04565054) to investigate additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6-inhibitor abemaciclib combined with ET compared to ET alone in pts. with high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Abemaciclib demonstrated to improve outcome in metastatic BC and even in EBC when given as part of primary therapy. Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of iDFS of abemaciclib + ET vs. standard ET. Secondary objectives include OS, dDFS, occurrence of CNS metastases, QoL, and translational research. Recruitment started in 9/2020 to screen 1250 pts. and to randomize 903 pts. in a ratio 3:2. Until date of submission, 33 pts. were screened and 22 randomized. Pre-/postmenopausal pts. with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC, 2-6 y after primary diagnosis, with either known high clinical risk (c/pN 2-3 OR high CTS score in pN 0-1 OR non-pCR after neoadj. CT in cN 1 or G3 tumors OR G3 and Ki-67 ≥ 40% in pN 0-1) or known high genomic risk (RS >25 in c/pN 0, RS >18 in c/pN 1 OR high risk Prosigna, EPclin or Mammaprint in pN 0-1) or intermediate clinical, but unknown genomic risk (luminal B-like (G3 or Ki-67 ≥20%) in c/pN 0-1 AND either RS >25 in c/pN 0 or RS >18 in c/p N1 in screening) will be eligible. Treatment duration is 2 years for the abemaciclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm, followed by at least 3-6 years ET alone. Pts. in control arm will receive 5-8-years ET at investigator´s choice. ePROs are collected using CANKADO. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research to assess alterations in molecular markers. Liquid biopsies (CTC/ctDNA/ctRNA) will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC using an appropriate technology at time of testing. Conclusions: ADAPTlate seeks to evaluate whether Abemaciclib + ET is superior to ET alone in pts. with clinical or genomic high-risk EBC even 2-6 years after initial diagnosis. Translational research aims at assessing potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine and/or CDK4/6 targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04565054.

Immune cell composition and functional marker dynamics from multiplexed immunohistochemistry to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial

BACKGROUND

The association of early changes in the immune infiltrate during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unexplored.

METHODS

Multiplexed immunohistochemistry was performed in matched tumor biopsies obtained at baseline and after 3 weeks of NACT from 66 patients from the West German Study Group Adjuvant Dynamic Marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy Trial Optimizing Risk Assessment and Therapy Response Prediction in Early Breast Cancer - Triple Negative Breast Cancer (WSG-ADAPT-TN) trial. Association between CD4, CD8, CD73, T cells, PD1-positive CD4 and CD8 cells, and PDL1 levels in stroma and/or tumor at baseline, week 3 and 3-week change with pCR was evaluated with univariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Compared with no change in immune cell composition and functional markers, transition from 'cold' to 'hot' (below-median and above-median marker level at baseline, respectively) suggested higher pCR rates for PD1-positive CD4 (tumor: OR=1.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.42; stroma: OR=2.65, 95% CI 0.65 to 10.71) and PD1-positive CD8 infiltrates (tumor: OR=1.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.20; stroma: OR=1.25, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.84; tumor+stroma: OR=1.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.12). No pCR was observed after 'hot-to-cold' transition in PD1-positive CD8 cells. pCR rates appeared lower after hot-to-cold transitions in T cells (tumor: OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.34; stroma: OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.25; tumor+stroma: OR=0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (tumor: OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.35; stroma: OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.92; tumor+stroma: OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.94). Higher pCR rates collated with 'altered' distribution (levels below-median and above-median in tumor and stroma, respectively) of T cell (OR=3.50, 95% CI 0.84 to 14.56) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (OR=4.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.14).

CONCLUSION

Our exploratory findings indicate that comprehensive analysis of early immune infiltrate dynamics complements currently investigated predictive markers for pCR and may have a potential to improve guidance for individualized de-escalation/escalation strategies in TNBC.

Abstract OT-01-02: Adaptlate -a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase-iii trial on adjuvant dynamic marker - adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high risk, hr+/her2- early breast cancer

Goals: The WSG ADAPT trial program is one of the first new generation trials addressing the issue of individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in early breast cancer (EBC) in a subtype-specific manner. The first WSG ADAPT umbrella trial (NCT01779206) aimed to establish early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a short 3-week induction treatment and to omit chemotherapy in a large cohort of early high risk HR+/HER2- patients. The aim of the ADAPTlate phase-III-trial is to improve adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk for late disease recurrence, who have completed definite locoregional therapy (with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy) and are under adjuvant endocrine treatment. This high-risk population does not derive optimal benefit from standard ET, often develops secondary resistance against ET and consequently late recurrences. With ADAPTlate, it is planned to evaluate whether patients with high-risk EBC derive additional benefit from adding abemaciclib to ET even 2-6 year after their initial diagnosis. Abemaciclib has been shown to improve outcome in metastatic breast cancer and recently, even in early breast cancer when given as part of primary therapy. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, non-blinded, randomized, controlled adjuvant phase III trial (NCT not yet assigned). It investigates whether patients with HR+/HER2- EBC identified as high-risk during screening (based on clinical or genomic risk) derive additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib combined with ET compared to ET alone. Starting Q3 2020 (enrollment 36 months, 50 sites), 1250 patients will be screened and 903 randomized in a ratio 3:2 (602 to abemaciclib + ET; 301 to standard ET). Pre-/postmenopausal patients with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC and 2-6 years after primary diagnosis, with either known high clinical risk (c/pN 2-3 OR high CTS score in pN 0-1 OR non-pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN 1 or G3 tumors OR G3 and Ki-67 ≥ 40% in pN 0-1) or known high genomic risk (Oncotype Dx® / RS &gt;25 in c/pN 0, RS &gt;18 in c/pN 1 OR high risk Prosigna®, EPclin® or Mammaprint® in pN 0-1) or intermediate clinical, but unknown genomic risk (luminal B-like (G3 or Ki-67 ≥20%) in c/pN 0-1 AND Oncotype DX® in screening either RS &gt;25 in c/pN 0 or RS &gt;18 in c/p N1) will be eligible. Treatment duration is 2 years for the interventional abemaciclib + ET (premenopausal: AI+GnRH) arm, followed by at least 3-6 years ET alone. Patients in control arm will receive 5-8-years ET at investigator´s choice. ePROs are collected using CANKADO. Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) of abemaciclib + ET vs. standard ET. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), distant disease-free survival (dDFS), occurrence of CNS metastases, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, EQ-5D-5L) and translational research. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers (e.g., ESR1, PIK3CA, CCND1, CDKN2A, RB1). In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC using the most appropriate technology at the time of testing. Conclusions: ADAPTlate seeks to evaluate whether enhancing ET with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor is superior to ET alone in patients with clinical or genomic high risk EBC even 2-6 years after their initial diagnosis. Translational research aims at assessing potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine and/or CDK4/6 targeted therapy.

Citation Format: Oleg Gluz, Tom Degenhardt, Norbert Marschner, Matthias Christgen, Hans Heinrich Kreipe, Ulrike Nitz, Ronald Kates, Timo Schinkoethe, Monika Graeser, Rachel Würstlein, Sherko Kuemmel, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Adaptlate -a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase-iii trial on adjuvant dynamic marker - adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high risk, hr+/her2- early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-01-02.

ADAPTcycle: Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy (ADAPT) comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC)

TPS601

Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program represents the concept of individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in EBC in a subtype-specific manner. The first WSG ADAPT umbrella trial aimed to establish early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a short 3-week induction treatment. The goals of the WSG ADAPT trial program are early response assessment and subtype-specific therapy tailoring to those patients who are most likely to benefit. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open-label, (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT04055493). It investigates whether patients (pts.) with HR+/HER2- EBC identified during screening as intermediate risk (based on Oncotype DX and response to 3 weeks of preoperative endocrine therapy [ET]) derive additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with ET compared to chemotherapy (CT) (followed by standard ET). Co-primary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) and distant DFS. It is planned to screen 5600 pts and to randomize 1670 pts in a 3:2 ratio (ribociclib + ET/CT). Study start was in July 2019 (80 sites, enrollment period 36 months) and until date of submission, 180 pts. have been screened and 40 randomized. Pts with HR+/HER2- EBC with clinically enhanced risk (cT2-4 or Ki67 20% or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfill the ADAPT intermediate-risk group criteria: either Recurrence Score (RS) ≤25 and Ki67postendocrine>10%, RS >25 and Ki67postendocrine<10% in p/cN0-1 pts, or RS ≤25 and Ki67postendocrine<10% in c/pN2-3 pts. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT arm; treatment is possible either in the neoadjuvant (ET + ribociclib duration 16 – 32 weeks) or adjuvant setting. ePROs are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel cardiology-supported CANKADO-based eHealth method. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers. In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression. Conclusions: ADAPTcycle seeks to evaluate whether endocrine-based therapy with ET and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor is superior to CT followed by ET in patients with luminal EBC who may be undertreated with ET alone (based on either lack of endocrine responsiveness or high tumor burden). Clinical trial information: 2018-003749-40 .

De-escalated chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy plus pertuzumab+ trastuzumab for HR+/HER2+ early breast cancer (BC): First efficacy results from the neoadjuvant WSG-TP-II study

515

Background: HR+/HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is a distinct entity associated with better prognosis compared to HR-/HER2+ BC. However, combination of chemotherapy (CT) with (dual) anti-HER2 blockade is standard in HER2+ early BC (EBC), irrespective of HR-status. Despite of some promising data on combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with dual anti-HER2 blockade in EBC and metastatic HR+/HER2+ BC, no prospective comparison of neoadjuvant CT vs. ET + dual HER2-blockade has yet been performed. Methods: In the prospective WSG TP-II phase II-trial (NCT03272477; Sponsor: Palleos GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), 207 patients (pts) (257 screened; 40 centers) with centrally confirmed HR+/HER2+ EBC were randomized to 12 weeks of standard ET (n=100) vs. paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly (n=107) +trastuzumab+pertuzumab q3w for all pts. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0). Secondary endpoints include safety, disease-free and overall survival, translational research, and quality of life (QoL). Omission of further CT was allowed in all pts with pCR; dual HER2-blockade was administered in the adjuvant setting in all pts. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. Median age was 53 years; 58% had cT2-4, 28% had cN+; 43% had G3 tumors. pCR data were available in 198 pts (ET: n=96; Pac: n=102). pCR was observed in 24% (95% CI: 16-34%) with ET+T+P vs. 57% (95% CI:47-67%) with Pac+T+P (OR 0.24, 95% CI: 0-0.46, p<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis and corresponding sensitivity analysis (bootstrap/subsample inclusion frequencies and lasso regression) including study arm, BMI, menopausal, cT, and cN status, histological grade, HER2-status, Ki67, ER, PR as continuous variables, only study arm and HER2 3+ status were significantly associated with pCR. Neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated in both study arms and completed per protocol in 93/92 (ET+P+T/Pac+P+T) patients. Only 9/13 SAEs (ET+P+T/Pac+P+T) were reported during neoadjuvant therapy. PAM50 and QoL analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: WSG TP-II is the first randomized prospective trial comparing two neoadjuvant de-escalation treatments in HR+/HER2+ EBC. The excellent pCR rate of 57% after only 12 weeks of Pac+P+T was clearly superior to the still promising 24% pCR rate in pts treated by ET+P+T. In both arms, treatment efficacy was most pronounced in HER2 3+ tumors. Survival results need to be awaited before definite recommendations for a de-escalated regimen in HR+/HER2+ EBC can be made. Clinical trial information: 2016-005157-21 .

[Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast cancer]

To classify as breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation a growth pattern as encountered in well differentiated (G1, G2) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastrointestinal tract and the lung must be present in addition to the immunohistochemical expression of neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin, synaptophysin). The majority of breast cancers fulfilling these criteria show hormone receptor positivity and with regard to prognosis resemble luminal type of breast cancer from which they are not fundamentally different. Despite lacking clinical relevance the up-coming WHO classification of breast cancer will nevertheless introduce the new category of NET luminal type. Immunohistochemical detection of neuroendocrine marker alone cannot be considered as sufficient for classification because it can frequently be encountered in other types of breast cancer (e.g. mucinous, solid papillary). From low grade NET with good differentiation those with poor differentiation and most frequently small cell appearance have to be differentiated. Poorly differentiated NET can primarily originate in the breast, which may be indicated by intraductal growth and co-expression of GATA3 but in these cases metastasis of extra mammary cancers has to be considered and correlation with the clinical findings is required for correct classification.

Efficacy of deescalated chemotherapy according to PAM50 subtypes, immune and proliferation genes in triple-negative early breast cancer: Primary translational analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial

In the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-TN trial, 12-week nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin (nab-pac/carbo) was highly effective and superior to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (nab-pac/gem) in triple-negative breast cancer regarding pathological complete response (pCR). Predictive markers for deescalated taxane/carbo use in TNBC need to be identified. Patients received 4 × nab-pac 125 mg/m² (plus carbo AUC2 or gem 1,000 mg/m² d1,8 q21). Expression of 119 genes and PAM50 scores by nCounter were available in 306/336 pretherapeutic samples. Interim survival analysis was planned after 36 months median follow-up. Basal-like (83.3%) compared to other subtypes was positively associated with pCR (38% vs. 20%, p = 0.015), as was lower HER2 score (p < 0.001). Proliferation biomarkers were positively associated with pCR, that is, PAM50 proliferation, ROR scores (all p < 0.004), higher Ki-67 (IHC; p < 0.001). For nab-pac/carbo, expression of immunological (CD8, PD1 and PFDL1) genes and proliferation markers (proliferation and ROR scores, MKI67, CDC20, NUF2, KIF2C, CENPF, EMP3 and TYMS) were positively associated with pCR (p < 0.05 for all). For nab-pac/gem, angiogenesis genes were negatively associated with pCR (ANGPTL4: p = 0.05; FGFR4: p = 0.02; VEGFA: p = 0.03). pCR after 12 weeks was strongly associated with favorable outcome (3y event-free survival: 92% vs. 71%, p < 0.001). In early TNBC, basal-like subtype, higher Ki-67 (IHC) and lower HER2 score were, associated with chemosensitivity. Chemoresistance pathways differed between the two taxane based combinations. Combination of proliferation/immune markers and PAM50 subtype could allow patient selection for further deescalated chemotherapy and/or immune treatment approaches.

ADAPTcycle: Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

TPS596

Background: WSG (West German Study Group)-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open-label, controlled (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized phase III trial (EudraCT 2018-003749-40). It investigates whether HR+/HER2- intermediate-risk patients (pts) (about 20 % of HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, EBC) identified during screening (OncotypeDX and 3-week endocrine therapy (ET)) derive additional benefit from 2-years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib plus ET compared to chemotherapy (CT) (followed by adjuvant ET). Co-primary endpoints are disease-free and distant disease-free survival. Methods: Starting Q1 2019 (enrollment 36 months, 80 sites), 5600 pts will be screened and 1670 randomized in a 3:2 ratio (1002 to ribociclib + ET; 668 to standard CT followed by ET). Pre-/postmenopausal pts with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC at clinically enhanced risk (cT2-4 or Ki67 > 20 % or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfill the ADAPT intermediate-risk group criteria: Recurrence Score (RS) ≤ 25 and poor endocrine response or RS > 25 and good endocrine response in p/cN0-1 pts or RS ≤ 25 with good endocrine response in c/pN2-3 pts. Endocrine responsiveness is determined by Ki67 response (drop to ≤ 10 %) after 3-week ET. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT arm; treatment can be given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. 5-year follow-up consists of standard adjuvant ET. Patient reported outcomes (ePROs) are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel CANKADO-based methodology. For translational analyses, tumor tissue will be collected at baseline (prior to ET), after 3-weeks ET (+/- 1w). Additional samples are required if residual tumor is diagnosed in case of neoadjuvant treatment and at time of recurrence. Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations of molecular markers (e. g., ESR1, PIK3CA, CCND1, CDKN2A, RB1). Circulating DNA and tumor cells from blood samples will be used to assess mutations, gene expression, etc. Clinical trial information: 2018-003749-40.

Abstract GS5-06: No survival benefit of chemotherapy escalation in patients with pCR and “high-immune” triple-negative early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-TN trial

Background:Immune markers such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD8, PDL1, PD1 and other protein or mRNA-based genomic markers have been identified as prognostic / predictive in TNBC regarding survival / chemotherapy (CTx) efficacy.

In the adjuvant WSG-PlanB trial, patients with high TILs and/or CD8 by mRNA had excellent outcome, irrespective of anthracycline use; in the neoadjuvant ADAPT-TN trial, high PDL1, PD1 and CD8 and/or TILs were predictive for pCR. Still, optimal markers for potential treatment de-escalation have yet to be determined. Here, we analyse for the first time impact of immune mRNA-based markers and TIL's as prognostic and predictive survival markers.

Methods: TNBC patients (ER/PR&lt;1%, HER2-,) were randomized to neoadjuvant 4x nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1/8 q3w (gem arm) or 4x nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC2 day 1/8 3-weekly (q3w) (carbo arm). Primary endpoint of WSG-ADAPT-TN was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0); secondary endpoints included translational analyses, e.g., TILs or expression of 119 genes by nCounter platform. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy (4xEC) was optional (not randomized) in patients achieving pCR after 12 weeks. According to protocol, 1st safety survival analysis was performed after 3y median follow-up.

Results: Present translational analysis included 306 of 336 TNBC patients (36 months median FU). pCR was associated with significantly better survival (3y EFS: 92% vs. 71%, p&lt;.001), but despite substantially higher pCR in the carbo arm (46% vs. 29%), no significant EFS advantage was seen (p=.6) (gem: 78%; carbo: 80%; 3y-EFS).

Bivariate Spearman correlations among CD8, PD1, and PDL1 were strongly positive; their correlations with TILs were moderately positive.

Preliminary Cox analysis of EFS was performed with clinical variables (cN, cT, menopausal status); neoadjuvant study arm; pCR; TILs; proliferation markers (baseline Ki67 by IHC, scores derived from PAM50); baseline immune markers; risk scores; and individual gene expression scores previously identified as prognostic for pCR in one or both neoadjuvant arms. Independent prognostic factors included pCR, cN, Ki67, PD1, and CD8; these were entered into (prognostic) interaction analysis. The resulting model contained cN, high Ki67 and low TILs as (unfavorable) main effects and the interaction of (higher) PD1*pCR (favorable).

Among pCR patients, the groups with/without additional adjuvant CTX were similar with respect to explanatory factors. Baseline TILs, Ki67, cN, and PD1 were entered into exploratory predictive analysis; the model retained only the interaction [adjuvant CTx * (fractionally ranked) PD1]. In patients with pCR, those with low PD1 benefited from standard anthracycline-containing adjuvant CTx, whereas patients high PD1 did not with an 98% 3y-EFS.

Conclusions: Our exploratory results suggest independent prognostic impact of mRNA markers and TIL's in early TNBC. Patients with both pCR (after 12 weeks) and “high-immune” signature (defined here by PD1) had excellent 3y-EFS and may be candidates for treatment de-escalation (e.g. omission of anthracyclines), whereas “low-immune” pCR patients may benefit from standard adjuvant poly-chemotherapy.

Citation Format: Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, Prat A, Christgen M, Feuerhake F, Garke M, Grischke E-M, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Pelz E, Gebauer D, Paré L, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. No survival benefit of chemotherapy escalation in patients with pCR and “high-immune” triple-negative early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-TN trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-06.