A Phase Ib Expansion Cohort Evaluating Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib and Dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy.

METHODS

Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis.

RESULTS

Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes.

Overcoming doxorubicin resistance in triple-negative breast cancer using the class I-targeting HDAC inhibitor bocodepsin/OKI-179 to promote apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with a poor prognosis. Doxorubicin is part of standard curative therapy for TNBC, but chemotherapy resistance remains an important clinical challenge. Bocodepsin (OKI-179) is a small molecule class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that promotes apoptosis in TNBC preclinical models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of bocodepsin and doxorubicin in preclinical TNBC models and evaluate the impact on terminal cell fate, including apoptosis and senescence.

METHODS

TNBC cell lines were treated with doxorubicin and CellTiter-Glo was used to assess proliferation and determine doxorubicin sensitivity. Select cell lines were treated with OKI-005 (in vitro version of bocodepsin) and doxorubicin and assessed for proliferation, apoptosis as measured by Annexin V/PI, and cell cycle by flow cytometry. Immunoblotting was used to assess changes in mediators of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and senescence. Senescence was measured by the senescence-associated β-galactosidase assay. An MDA-MB-231 xenograft in vivo model was treated with bocodepsin, doxorubicin, or the combination and assessed for inhibition of tumor growth. shRNA knockdown of p53 was performed in the CAL-51 cell line and proliferation, apoptosis and senescence were assessed in response to combination treatment.

RESULTS

OKI-005 and doxorubicin resulted in synergistic antiproliferative activity in TNBC cells lines regardless of p53 mutation status. The combination led to increased apoptosis and decreased senescence. In vivo, the combination resulted in increased tumor growth inhibition compared to either single agent. shRNA knock-down of p53 led to increased doxorubicin-induced senescence that was decreased with the addition of OKI-005 in vitro.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bocodepsin to doxorubicin resulted in synergistic antiproliferative activity in vitro, improved tumor growth inhibition in vivo, and promotion of apoptosis which makes this a promising combination to overcome doxorubicin resistance in TNBC. Bocodepsin is currently in clinical development and has a favorable toxicity profile compared to other HDAC inhibitors supporting the feasibility of evaluating this combination in patients with TNBC.

Phase 1/2 study of monalizumab plus durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The combination of monalizumab (anti-NKG2A/CD94) and durvalumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1) may promote antitumor immunity by targeting innate and adaptive immunity. This phase 1/2 study of monalizumab and durvalumab evaluated safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamics in patients with advanced solid tumors.

MAIN BODY

Immunotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with advanced disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting were enrolled. In part 1 (dose escalation), patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with increasing doses of monalizumab Q2W/Q4W (n=15). Dose expansion in part 1 included patients with cervical cancer (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer (CRC) (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q4W). In part 2 (dose expansion), patients with MSS-CRC (n=40), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=20), MSS-endometrial cancer (n=40), or ovarian cancer (n=40) received durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Exploratory analyses included assessment of T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell activation and proliferation in peripheral blood and the tumor microenvironment (TME). The study enrolled 185 patients (part 1, 45; part 2, 140). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. In part 2, the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (12.1%), asthenia (9.3%), diarrhea (9.3%), pruritus (7.9%), and pyrexia (7.1%). In the expansion cohorts, response rates were 0% (cervical), 7.7% (MSS-CRC), 10% (NSCLC), 5.4% (ovarian), and 0% (MSS-endometrial). Sustained NK cell activation, CD8+ T-cell proliferation, increased serum levels of CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10) and CXCL11, and increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ and granzyme B+ cells were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although efficacy was modest, monalizumab plus durvalumab was well tolerated and encouraging immune activation was observed in the peripheral blood and TME.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02671435.

Major cardiovascular adverse events in older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens: A SEER-medicare study

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX).

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45-0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66-75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07-2.62], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Among older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1-3 positive lymph nodes.

First-in-Human Dose-Escalation Study of the Novel Oral Depsipeptide Class I-Targeting HDAC Inhibitor Bocodepsin (OKI-179) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

(1) Background: Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a critical role in epigenetic signaling in cancer; however, available HDAC inhibitors have limited therapeutic windows and suboptimal pharmacokinetics (PK). This first-in-human phase I dose escalation study evaluated the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics (PDx), and efficacy of the oral Class I-targeting HDAC inhibitor bocodepsin (OKI-179). (2) Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 34) with advanced solid tumors were treated with OKI-179 orally once daily in three schedules: 4 days on 3 days off (4:3), 5 days on 2 days off (5:2), or continuous in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Single-patient escalation cohorts followed a standard 3 + 3 design. (3) Results: The mean duration of treatment was 81.2 (range 11-447) days. The most frequent adverse events in all patients were nausea (70.6%), fatigue (47.1%), and thrombocytopenia (41.2%). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OKI-179 was 450 mg with 4:3 and 200 mg with continuous dosing. Dose-limiting toxicities included decreased platelet count and nausea. Prolonged disease control was observed, including two patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Systemic exposure to the active metabolite exceeded the preclinical efficacy threshold at doses lower than the MTD and was temporally associated with increased histone acetylation in circulating T cells. (4) Conclusions: OKI-179 has a manageable safety profile at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 300 mg daily on a 4:3 schedule with prophylactic oral antiemetics. OKI-179 is currently being investigated with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma in the phase 2 Nautilus trial.

Safety and Efficacy of Tucatinib, Letrozole, and Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To overcome resistance to antihormonal and HER2-targeted agents mediated by cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex, we proposed an oral combination of the HER2 inhibitor tucatinib, aromatase inhibitor letrozole, and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (TLP combination) for treatment of HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Phase Ib/II TLP trial (NCT03054363) enrolled patients with HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with ≥2 HER2-targeted agents. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety of the regimen evaluated by NCI CTCAE version 4.3. The phase II primary endpoint was efficacy by median progression-free survival (mPFS).

RESULTS

Forty-two women ages 22 to 81 years were enrolled. Patients received a median of two lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, 71.4% had visceral disease, 35.7% had CNS disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (64.3%), leukopenia (23.8%), diarrhea (19.0%), and fatigue (14.3%). Tucatinib increased AUC10-19 hours of palbociclib 1.7-fold, requiring palbociclib dose reduction from 125 to 75 mg daily. In 40 response-evaluable patients, mPFS was 8.4 months, with similar mPFS in non-CNS and CNS cohorts (10.0 months vs. 8.2 months; P = 0.9). Overall response rate was 44.5%, median duration of response was 13.9 months, and clinical benefit rate was 70.4%; 60% of patients were on treatment for ≥6 months, 25% for ≥1 year, and 10% for ≥2 years. In the CNS cohort, 26.6% of patients remained on study for ≥1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

TLP combination was safe and tolerable. AEs were expected and manageable with supportive therapy and dose reductions. TLP showed excellent efficacy for an all-oral chemotherapy-free regimen warranting further testing. See related commentary by Huppert and Rugo, p. 4993.

The emergence of targeted therapy for HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer: a review of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive sub-type of breast cancer. Despite recent advances, metastatic TNBC remains difficult to treat with limited targeted treatment options. Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and is composed of a unique linker bound to the topoisomerase I inhibitor DXd. T-DXd has significant anti-tumor activity in patients with HER2-low TNBC.

AREAS COVERED

This review reports on the mechanism, pre-clinical/clinical studies, efficacy, and tolerability of T-DXd. A literature search was conducted via PubMed using keywords such as 'fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan,' 'Enhertu,' and 'HER2-low cancers.'

EXPERT OPINION

The Phase III Destiny-Breast04 Trial showed benefit in progression-free and overall survival in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancers treated with T-DXd compared to treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy. T-DXd is the first pharmaceutical to effectively target a HER2-low population with clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with HER2-low TNBC. Compared to chemotherapy, T-DXd has a similar safety profile, with the additional need for close monitoring for interstitial lung disease. Given the clinical activity of T-DXd in TNBC, it is likely there will be continued efforts to refine HER2-low diagnostics and to develop additional ADCs with other protein targets.

Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

This clinical trial combined fulvestrant with the anti-androgen enzalutamide in women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC). Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/HER2- measurable or evaluable metastatic BC. Prior fulvestrant was allowed. Fulvestrant was administered at 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Enzalutamide was given at 160 mg po daily. Fresh tumor biopsies were required at study entry and after 4 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). The median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); median of 4 prior non-hormonal and 3 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease. Twelve had prior fulvestrant, and 91% had visceral disease. CBR24 was 25% (7/28 evaluable). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 weeks (95% CI: 2-52). Adverse events were as expected for hormonal therapy. Significant (p < 0.1) univariate relationships existed between PFS and ER%, AR%, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations. Baseline levels of phospho-proteins in the mTOR pathway were more highly expressed in biopsies of patients with shorter PFS. Fulvestrant plus enzalutamide had manageable side effects. The primary endpoint of CBR24 was 25% in heavily pretreated metastatic ER+/HER2- BC. Short PFS was associated with activation of the mTOR pathway, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were associated with an increased hazard of progression. Thus, a combination of fulvestrant or other SERD plus AKT/PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with or without AR inhibition warrants investigation in second-line endocrine therapy of metastatic ER+ BC.

Abstract OT3-09-01: Clinical Trial of Alpelisib and Tucatinib in Patients with PIK3CA-Mutant HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway plays a key role in resistance to the drugs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Activating mutations in the gene encoding alpha catalytic subunit of PI3K (PIK3CA) are present in approximately 30% of HER2+ tumors. PIK3CA mutations are linked to drug resistance and decreased survival in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. To overcome this resistance mechanism, we designed a phase IB/II clinical trial to evaluate the combination of HER2 small molecule inhibitor tucatinib with PI3K inhibitor alpelisib in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (NCT05230810). This multicenter clinical trial is conducted through the Academic Breast Cancer Consortium (ABRCC), with the University of Colorado Cancer Center as the lead site. Target enrollment: 40 patients. This is a run-in phase IB/roll-over phase II study. Phase IB will follow Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval design and enroll from 9 to 19 patients to find the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of tucatinib and alpelisib. From 21 to 31 patients will be enrolled in phase II part, for a total of 40 patients in the final efficacy analysis. Main inclusion criteria: 1. Women and men ≥ 18 years old 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 3. Presence of activating PIK3CA mutation in the tumor 4. Patients with HR-/HER2+ or HR+/HER2+ breast cancer may enroll; ovarian suppression is mandatory for premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2+ disease 5. HR+/HER2+ patients should be agreeable to concomitant treatment with fulvestrant 6. Prior treatment with at least two FDA-approved HER2-targeted agents 7. Measurable or evaluable disease. Bone only disease is allowed. 8. Subjects with untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases not needing immediate local therapy, and subjects with previously treated stable or progressive brain metastases may enroll, provided that there is no indication for immediate re-treatment. For patients with treated CNS metastases: time from treatment of CNS disease until the first dose of study drugs should be as follows: WBRT ≥ 21 days, surgical resection ≥ 14 days, SRS ≥ 7 days. 9. Adequate organ and marrow function Main exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindications to undergo contrast brain MRI 2. Leptomeningeal disease 3. Poorly controlled seizures 4. Diabetes mellitus type I, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type II 5. Acute pancreatitis within 1 year of screening, or history of chronic pancreatitis 6. History of severe cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions 7. Toxicities of prior cancer therapies that have not resolved to grade 1 or less, except peripheral neuropathy, which must have resolved to grade 2 or less, and alopecia 8. Previous treatment with EGFR or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or PI3K/mTOR/AKT inhibitors. 9. Systemic anti-cancer therapy, palliative radiation to extracranial sites, or surgery within 2 weeks of the first dose of study drugs 10. Active bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, hepatitis B, C, or HIV 11. Clinically significant cardio-vascular disease Primary objectives: • Phase IB: safety and tolerability of combination therapy • Phase II: efficacy by progression free survival Exploratory assessment of biomarkers will be performed in the liquid biopsy samples. Study contact: Elena Shagisultanova, MD, PhD, elena.shagisultanova@cuanschutz.edu

Citation Format: Elena Shagisultanova, Kari B. Wisinski, Chelsea D. Gawryletz, Farrah M. Datko, Diana Medgyesy, Jennifer R. Diamond, Virginia F. Borges, Peter Kabos. Clinical Trial of Alpelisib and Tucatinib in Patients with PIK3CA-Mutant HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-09-01.

Clinical outcomes of adjuvant taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens in older adults with node-positive, triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare study

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer associated with an aggressive clinical course. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive TNBC. The benefit of anthracycline plus taxane (ATAX) regimens compared with non-anthracycline-containing, taxane-based regimens (TAX) in older women with node-positive TNBC is not well characterised.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 1106 women with node-positive TNBC diagnosed at age 66 years and older between 2010 and 2015. We compared patient clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyse OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumour characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 1106 patients in our cohort, 767 (69.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX (364/767, 47.5%), TAX (297/767, 39%) or other regimens (106/767, 13.8%). Independent predictors of which patients were more likely to receive ATAX versus TAX included more extensive nodal involvement (≥4), age, marital/partner status and non-cardiac comorbidities. There was a statistically significant improvement in 3-year CSS (81.8% versus 71.4%) and OS (70.7% versus 51.3%) with the use of any chemotherapy in our cohort (P < 0.01). Three-year CSS and OS for patients who received ATAX versus TAX were similar at 82.8% versus 83.7% (P = 0.80) and 74.2% versus 72.7% (P = 0.79), respectively. There was a trend towards improved CSS and OS in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes who received ATAX versus TAX (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36-1.23, P = 0.19 and hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.14, P = 0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among older women with node-positive TNBC, a majority of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, which was associated with an improvement in CSS and OS. When compared with TAX chemotherapy, there was a trend towards better outcomes with ATAX for patients with ≥4 nodes.

ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background

AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response (DDR) associated with double-strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan is used clinically to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), often in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU). AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU was evaluated in preclinical models of CRC to determine whether low doses of AZD0156 enhance the cytotoxicity of irinotecan in chemotherapy regimens used in the clinic.

Methods

Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156, the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38), and combination therapy were evaluated in 12 CRC cell lines. Additional assessment with clonogenic assay, cell cycle analysis, and immunoblotting were performed in 4 selected cell lines. Four colorectal cancer patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, or 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI). Immunofluorescence was performed on tumor tissues. The DDR mutation profile was compared across in vitro and in vivo models.

Results

Enhanced effects on cellular proliferation and regrowth were observed with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 in select models. In cell cycle analysis of these models, increased G2/M arrest was observed with combination treatment over either single agent. Immunoblotting results suggest an increase in DDR associated with irinotecan therapy, with a reduced effect noted when combined with AZD0156, which is more pronounced in some models. Increased TGI was observed with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in some PDX models. The DDR mutation profile was variable across models.

Conclusions

AZD0156 and irinotecan provide a rational and active combination in preclinical colorectal cancer models. Variability across in vivo and in vitro results may be related to the variable DDR mutation profiles of the models evaluated. Further understanding of the implications of individual DDR mutation profiles may help better identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan in the clinical setting.

BMS-986158, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain Proteins, in Patients with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from a Phase 1/2a Trial

This phase 1/2a, open-label study (NCT02419417) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986158, a selective bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor. Dose escalation was performed with 3 BMS-986158 dosing schedules: A (5 days on, 2 days off; range, 0.75–4.5 mg), B (14 days on, 7 days off; 2.0–3.0 mg), and C (7 days on, 14 days off; 2.0–4.5 mg). Eighty-three patients were enrolled and received ≥1 BMS-986158 dose. Diarrhea (43%) and thrombocytopenia (39%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A lower incidence of TRAEs was found with schedules A (72%) and C (72%) vs. B (100%). Stable disease was achieved in 12 (26.1%), 3 (37.5%), and 9 (31.0%) patients on schedules A, B, and C, respectively. Two patients on schedule A with a 4.5-mg starting dose (ovarian cancer, n = 1; nuclear protein in testis [NUT] carcinoma, n = 1) experienced a partial response. BMS-986158 demonstrated rapid-to-moderate absorption (median time to maximum observed plasma concentration, 1–4 h). As expected with an epigenetic modifier, expression changes in select BET-regulated genes occurred with BMS-986158 treatment. Schedule A dosing (5 days on, 2 days off) yielded tolerable safety, preliminary antitumor activity, and a dose-proportional PK profile.

A dose regimen-finding study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity of oratecan in subjects with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Irinotecan is a commonly used chemotherapeutic in solid tumor malignancies. Oratecan is an investigational product comprised of encequidar methanesulfonate, a novel minimally absorbed P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor, and irinotecan. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oratecan in patients with advanced malignancies.

METHODS

Using a "3 + 3″ dose-escalation design, patients were treated with oratecan on day 1 every 21 days. The irinotecan dose was escalated from 20 to 320 mg/m². The encequidar methanesulfonate dose was fixed at 15 mg (12.9 mg free base). PK sampling for irinotecan, encequidar and its major metabolites was performed following a single dose of oratecan during cycle 1. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were treated. The MTD was determined to be 280 mg/m² every 21 days. Irinotecan and SN-38 plasma concentration-time profile showed that irinotecan exposure increased with dose and followed biexponential decay. Nine of 17 patients at oratecan dose levels 200 mg/m² and above had SN-38 exposures comparable to those with intravenous irinotecan at standard dosing. None of the 35 patients achieved a radiologic response, ten patients had SD for > 8 weeks; the median progression-free survival for all treated patients was 9 weeks (95% CI 8.6-13.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of oratecan was encequidar methanesulfonate 15 mg plus irinotecan 280 mg/m². Exposure for irinotecan and SN-38 increased with increased dose. Potential antitumor activity was observed at the 280 and 320 mg/m² dose levels. The safety profile of oratecan was comparable to that of intravenous irinotecan.

Abstract 1063: Combination strategies to overcome doxorubicin induced senescence in triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that lacks the expression of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor-2 over-expression. Compared to other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC is associated with a higher risk for metastatic recurrence. While immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and sacituzumab govitecan have shown benefit in a subset of TNBC patients, chemotherapy with doxorubicin remains a mainstay of treatment. Senescence is a cellular phenomenon where cells are committed to an arrested state, however, senescent cells are able to secrete pro-tumorigenic factors which can help to promote tumor progression and invasion. It has been suggested that senescence is a potential mechanism of resistance in doxorubicin (dox) treated cells. Transitioning senescence mediated resistance to apoptosis is crucial to the treatment of TNBC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination BCL-2 and HDAC inhibitors with dox to overcome resistance and induce apoptosis.

Experimental Procedures: TNBC cell lines resistant and sensitive to doxorubicin were identified using a CellTiter-Glo Viability Assay and resistant cell lines were selected for further analysis. To assess proliferation, dox resistant TNBC cell lines were plated in 96-well plates. Cells were exposed to vehicle control, dox, BCL-2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor or the combination of dox and BCL-2 inhibitor or HDAC inhibitor for 72 hours. Cellular proliferation was assessed using the BioSpa live cell analysis system. Apoptosis at 24 hours was analyzed by flow cytometry using Annexin V on cells treated in combination and as single agents. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the downstream effects of apoptosis and senescence of drugs as single agents and in combination.

Results: The addition of a BCL-2 inhibitor and HDAC inhibitor to doxorubicin resulted in decreased proliferation in resistant TNBC cell lines compared to single agents and vehicle control by live cell microscopy. Furthermore, the combination of dox and a BCL-2 inhibitor resulted in increased apoptosis when compared to single agents and control using Annexin V staining. The cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16 were over-expressed in cells exposed to combination treatment. Apoptotic proteins BAD, PUMA, cleaved PARP and the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 were upregulated in cells treated with a BCL-2 inhibitor with or without dox. The pro-mitotic protein cyclin-B1 was downregulated in resistant cells treated with single agent BCL-2 inhibitor and in combination with dox. Additional mechanistic studies are ongoing.

Conclusion: The combination of doxorubicin with BCL-2 and HDAC inhibitors resulted in decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis. Potential senolytic drugs used with dox represent an exciting potential to overcome dox resistance and warrant further investigation.

Citation Format: Anna R. Schreiber, Stephen Smoots, Betelehem W. Yacob, Adrian TA Dominguez, Cecilia Levandowski, Jennifer R. Diamond, Todd M. Pitts. Combination strategies to overcome doxorubicin induced senescence in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1063.

Abstract 136: Doxorubicin-induced senescence as a mechanism of resistance in TNBC cell lines

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer which lacks HER2 overexpression, as well estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. TNBC constitutes 10-15% of all breast cancers but has a worse prognosis due to limited treatment options and high rates of metastatic recurrence. Doxorubicin (dox) remains one of the most active chemotherapy agents for the treatment of TNBC, although de novo and acquired resistance to chemotherapy remains a major challenge. The purpose of this work was to characterize dox resistant cell phenotypes and investigate treatment-induced senescence in p53-mutated (Mut) and wildtype (WT) TNBC cell lines.

Methods: A panel of 12 TNBC cell lines (p53 WT and p53 Mut) were exposed to dox (0-5 uM) for 72 hours and cellular proliferation was determined using the Cell Titer Glo assay. A subset of sensitive and resistant cell lines were treated with dox (0.1, 0.25 uM) or vehicle control and apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry (Annexin-V) at 24 and 48 hrs. Cells were treated with dox or control for 24 hrs and western blotting was performed for mediators of apoptosis. Senescence was analyzed by ß-galactosidase staining following treatment with dox for 3-14 days. shRNA knockdown (KD) of p53 was performed in the CAL-51 (p53 WT cell line) and cells were subject to investigations above.

Results: Doxorubicin treatment resulted in decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis as assessed by Annexin-V expression in a subset of p53 WT and p53 Mut cell lines. Treatment with dox resulted in an increase in the pro-apoptotic proteins BID and p21, as well as a decrease in VAMP in sensitive cell lines. In a subset of cell lines resistant to dox treatment, we observed an increase in cells demonstrating phenotypic features of senescence and ß -galactosidase staining. We observed a decrease in p16 with dox treatment in the CAL-51 (p53 WT cell line) compared to an increase following treatment in p53 Mut cell lines. KD of p53 resulted in an increase in senescent cells following treatment with low dose dox.

Conclusions: Treatment with doxorubicin resulted in different terminal cell phenotypes in TNBC cell lines with apoptosis observed in p53 WT and Mut cell lines. Senescence was observed in resistant cells and KD of p53 increased dox-induced senescence, confirming a role for p53 in mediating terminal cell fate. Efforts are ongoing to understand the role of mutant p53 in mediating terminal cell fate in response to dox and rational combinations to overcome dox-induced senescence may be clinically active in metastatic TNBC.

Citation Format: Stephen G. Smoots, Anna R. Schreiber, Betelehem Yacob, Adrian Dominguez, Cecilia Levandowski, Todd M. Pitts, Jennifer R. Diamond. Doxorubicin-induced senescence as a mechanism of resistance in TNBC cell lines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 136.

Abstract CT249: First-in-human study of TAK-500, a novel STING agonist immune stimulating antibody conjugate (ISAC), alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with select advanced solid tumors

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, resistance remains a challenge. Reduced interferon (IFN) signaling, immune escape and immunosuppressive tumor phenotypes have been proposed as resistance mechanisms, suggesting innate immune cell stimulation in the tumor microenvironment as a potential strategy to overcome resistance. Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) is a cytosolic protein critical for induction of type 1 IFN-dependent innate immunity. Cysteine-cysteine chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) is expressed by tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, including tumor associated macrophages (TAM), and promotes immune escape by limiting CD8+ T-cell infiltration. TAK-500 is an ISAC that consists of three parts: a STING agonist payload based on TAK-676 (currently under phase 1 clinical evaluation [NCT04420884, NCT04879849]), the IgG1 anti-CCR2 antibody (previously evaluated in early phase studies), and a self-immolating maleimide-containing protease-cleavable peptide linker. By targeting STING to CCR2 expressing myeloid cells, TAK-500 has three possible mechanisms of action: activation of IFN response, reprogramming of suppressive intratumoral CCR2+ cells to an inflammatory phenotype, and blockade of suppressive TAM recruitment. TAK-500 thus has the potential to overcome resistance to CPIs in both CPI refractory and immunologically excluded or deserted tumors.

Methods: This phase 1a/1b open-label study (NCT05070247) will evaluate the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TAK-500 in patients aged ≥18 years with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, mesothelioma or triple-negative breast cancer. Patients must have had progressive disease or intolerance to all standard therapy. In the initial dose escalation phase, patients will receive single-agent intravenous (IV) TAK-500 administered once every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 21-day cycles to determine the pharmacologically active dose (PAD) range. An additional escalation cohort will receive TAK-500 in combination with IV pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W in 21-day cycles, with the initial TAK-500 dose level beginning 1-2 dose levels below the predicted single agent PAD range. Dose escalation in both single agent and combination cohorts will be guided by the Bayesian Optimal Interval design. A subsequent dose expansion phase will evaluate TAK-500 in combination with pembrolizumab. Planned enrollment for both escalation and expansion cohorts is ~106 patients.

Citation Format: Jennifer R. Diamond, Jason T. Henry, Gerald S. Falchook, Anthony J. Olszanski, Harshabad Singh, E. Jane Leonard, Richard C. Gregory, Vicky A. Appleman, John P. Gibbs, Carole E. Harbison, Cong Li, Jessica M. Sapiro, Tomoki Yoneyama, Alexander Parent, Vincent Chung. First-in-human study of TAK-500, a novel STING agonist immune stimulating antibody conjugate (ISAC), alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with select advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT249.

Abstract CT120: Phase II study of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype lacking hormone receptor expression and HER2 over-expression. Metastatic TNBC has been difficult to treat due to a general lack of targeted therapies, however, immunotherapy has shown substantial activity in a subset of patients. In metastatic TNBC patients with PD-L1-positive (combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10) disease, KEYNOTE-355 demonstrated that addition of pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) to chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or carboplatin/gemcitabine) prolonged median progression free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone (9.7 months vs 5.6 months). Median 1-year PFS was also increased from 12.0% to 39.1% in these patients treated with pembrolizumab. These data led to the FDA approval of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive metastatic TNBC patients. Despite these encouraging results, the majority of patients do not have long-term disease control. Radiotherapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapy represents a promising avenue to prolong long-term response. RT can stimulate cellular damage and cause the release of tumor antigens, promoting a local T cell response. In addition, localized RT can result in the shrinkage of distant sites of metastasis via the abscopal effect when used with immunotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the benefit of combining RT with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic PD-L1-positive TNBC.

Methods: This two-stage, single-arm phase II study will assess the efficacy of RT in combination with nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab in PD-L1-positive unresectable or metastatic TNBC patients aged ≥18 years. To be included, patients must have only received &lt; 1 prior line of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting or adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting if metastatic recurrence was within 12 months of treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year PFS rate and a total of 29 subjects will be enrolled. Patients will be treated first with RT followed by the initiation of systemic therapy within seven days. Ablative RT will be directed at 1-4 sites of metastatic disease in 3 fractions of 8 Gy each. Nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel will be given weekly day 1, day 8 every 3 weeks and pembrolizumab will be given every 3 weeks. Imaging will be repeated every 9 weeks to assess response based on RECIST 1.1. Systemic treatment will be continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Treatment beyond progression will be allowed in certain patients who had initial response followed by progression. In these patients, repeat RT to new sites of disease can be administered with continuation of pembrolizumab to investigate the potential of re-sensitizing patients to immunotherapy. Blood will be collected before and after treatment for immune profiling. The sample size was determined using a null hypothesis for the 1-year PFS rate of 39% and an alternate hypothesis of 60%. The sample size of 29 yields a power of 80% to detect this difference with an alpha of 0.1 (1-sided). An interim analysis will be performed after enrollment of seventeen subjects in stage one.

Citation Format: Anna R. Schreiber, Jodi Kagihara, Andrew Nicklawsky, Dexiang Gao, Anosheh Afghahi, Anthony Elias, Peter Kabos, Elena Shagisultanova, Todd Pitts, Julie Lang, Sana Karam, Virginia Borges, Christine Fisher, Jennifer R. Diamond. Phase II study of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT120.

Preclinical Development of the Class-I-Selective Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor OKI-179 for the Treatment of Solid Tumors

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play critical roles in epigenomic regulation, and histone acetylation is dysregulated in many human cancers. Although HDAC inhibitors are active in T-cell lymphomas, poor isoform selectivity, narrow therapeutic indices, and a deficiency of reliable biomarkers may contribute to the lack of efficacy in solid tumors. In this article, we report the discovery and preclinical development of the novel, orally bioavailable, class-I-selective HDAC inhibitor, OKI-179. OKI-179 and its cell active predecessor OKI-005 are thioester prodrugs of the active metabolite OKI-006, a unique congener of the natural product HDAC inhibitor largazole. OKI-006, OKI-005, and subsequently OKI-179, were developed through a lead candidate optimization program designed to enhance physiochemical properties without eroding potency and selectivity relative to largazole. OKI-005 displays antiproliferative activity in vitro with induction of apoptosis and increased histone acetylation, consistent with target engagement. OKI-179 showed antitumor activity in preclinical cancer models with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and on-target pharmacodynamic effects. Based on its potency, desirable class I HDAC inhibition profile, oral bioavailability, and efficacy against a broad range of solid tumors, OKI-179 is currently being evaluated in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial with plans for continued clinical development in solid tumor and hematologic malignancies.

First-in-human dose escalation study of cyclin-dependent kinase-9 inhibitor VIP152 in patients with advanced malignancies shows early signs of clinical efficacy

PURPOSE

To report on the first-in-human phase I study of VIP152 (NCT02635672), a potent and highly selective CDK9 inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with solid tumors or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who were refractory to or had exhausted all available therapies received VIP152 monotherapy as a 30-minute intravenous, once weekly infusion, as escalating doses (5, 10, 15, 22.5, or 30 mg in 21-day cycles) until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received {greater than or equal to} 1 VIP152 dose, with 30 mg identified as the MTD based on dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting (75.7% and 56.8%, respectively), all of grade 1/2 severity. Of the most common events, Grade 3/4 events occurring in > 1 patient were neutropenia (22%), anemia (11%), abdominal pain (8%), increased alkaline phosphatase (8%), and hyponatremia (8%). Day 1 exposure for the MTD exceeded the predicted minimum therapeutic exposure and reproducibly achieved maximal pathway modulation; no accumulation occurred after multiple doses. Seven of 30 patients with solid tumors had stable disease (including 9.5 and 16.8 months in individual patients with pancreatic cancer and salivary gland cancer, respectively), and 2 of 7 patients with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2/BCL6 translocations (HGL) achieved durable complete metabolic remission (ongoing at study discontinuation, after 3.7 and 2.3 years of treatment).

CONCLUSION

VIP152 monotherapy, administered intravenously once weekly, demonstrated a favorable safety profile and evidence of clinical benefit in patients with advanced HGL and solid tumors.

Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC.

Patients and methods

Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan–Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX.

Results

Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032).

Conclusion

While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06424-z.

Tackling metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with sacituzumab govitecan

Introduction Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer with poor survival that is difficult to treat due to a lack of targeted options. Conventional therapies targeting hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) are ineffective and often chemotherapy is standard-of-care. Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of an active metabolite of irinotecan, SN-38, bound to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblastic cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2). Trop-2 is highly expressed on the surface of TNBC cells, making it an attractive target. Areas covered We explore the mechanism, pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sacituzumab govitecan. A literature search was conducted via PubMed using keywords such as 'sacituzumab govitecan,' and 'metastatic TNBC.' Expert opinion Sacituzumab govitecan has promising survival benefits in patients with previously treated mTNBC based on data from the ASCENT trial. Common adverse effects were neutropenia, diarrhea, and nausea, however these effects were manageable with supportive care. Sacituzumab govitecan has shown promise in cancers outside of TNBC, such as urothelial and lung and is being evaluated in HR-positive breast cancers. It is likely we will see this therapy used in combination with other novel targeted agents as current clinical trials mature.

A Phase I Study of an MPS1 Inhibitor (BAY 1217389) in Combination with Paclitaxel Using a Novel Randomized Continual Reassessment Method for Dose Escalation

PURPOSE

Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) kinase inhibitor, BAY 1217389 (BAY) synergizes with paclitaxel. This phase I study assessed the combination of BAY with paclitaxel using a novel randomized continuous reassessment method (rCRM) to improve dose determination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive oral BAY (twice daily 2-days-on/5-days-off) with weekly paclitaxel (90 mg/m²) or paclitaxel monotherapy in cycle 1. Dose escalation was guided by CRM modeling. Primary objectives were to assess safety, establish the MTD of BAY, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles for both compounds. Simulations were performed to determine the contribution of the rCRM for dose determination.

RESULTS

In total, 75 patients were enrolled. The main dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic toxicities (55.6%). The MTD of BAY was established at 64 mg twice daily with paclitaxel. Inclusion of a control arm enabled the definitive attribution of grade ≥3 neutropenia to higher BAY exposure [AUC_0-12 (P< 0.001)]. After determining the MTD, we included 19 patients with breast cancer at this dose for dose expansion. Other common toxicities were nausea (45.3%), fatigue (41.3%), and diarrhea (40.0%). Overall confirmed responses were seen in 31.6% of evaluable patients. Simulations showed that rCRM outperforms traditional designs in determining the true MTD.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of BAY with paclitaxel was associated with considerable toxicity without a therapeutic window. However, the use of the rCRM design enabled us to determine the exposure-toxicity relation for BAY. Therefore, we propose that the rCRM could improve dose determination in phase I trials that combine agents with overlapping toxicities.