Remote history of VTE is associated with severe COVID-19 in middle and older age: UK Biobank cohort study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, life-threatening complication of COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 risk-prediction models include a history of VTE. However, it is unclear whether remote history (>9 years previously) of VTE also confers increased risk of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate possible association between VTE and COVID-19 severity, independent of other risk factors.

METHODS

Cohort study of UK Biobank participants recruited between 2006 and 2010. Baseline data, including history of VTE, were linked to COVID-19 test results, COVID-19-related hospital admissions, and COVID-19 deaths. The risk of COVID-19 hospitalization or death was compared for participants with a remote history VTE versus without. Poisson regression models were run univariately then adjusted stepwise for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and comorbid covariates.

RESULTS

After adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle confounders and comorbid conditions, remote history of VTE was associated with nonfatal community (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.54, p = .039), nonfatal hospitalized (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06-2.17, p = .024) and severe (hospitalized or fatal) (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.89, p = .025) COVID-19. Associations with remote history of VTE were stronger among men (severe COVID-19: RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.42, p = .009) than for women (severe COVID-19: RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.66-1.74, p = .786).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support inclusion of remote history of VTE in COVID-19 risk-prediction scores, and consideration of sex-specific risk scores.

Association Between Walking Pace and Stroke Incidence: Findings From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Purpose- Stroke incidence in younger and middle-aged people is growing. Despite this, its associations in this subset of the stroke population are unknown, and prevention strategies are not tailored to meet their needs. This study examined the association between self-reported walking pace and incident stroke. Methods- Data from the UK Biobank were used in a prospective population-based study. Three hundred and sixty-three thousand, one hundred and thirty-seven participants aged 37 to 73 years (52% women) were recruited. The associations of self-reported walking pace with stroke incidence over follow-up were investigated using Cox proportional-hazard models. Results- Among 363,137 participants, 2705 (0.7%) participants developed a fatal or nonfatal stroke event over the mean follow-up period of 6.1 years (interquartile range, 5.4-6.7). Slow walking pace was associated with a higher hazard for stroke incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.26-1.66]; P<0.0001). Stroke incidence was not associated with walking pace among people <65 years of age. However, slow walking pace was associated with a higher risk of stroke among participants aged ≥65 years (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.17-1.72]; P<0.0001). A higher risk for stroke was observed on those with middle (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.01-1.63]; P=0.039) and higher (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.69]; P=0.012) deprivation levels but not in the least deprived individuals. Similarly, overweight (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.04-1.63]; P=0.019) and obese (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.09-1.63]; P=0.004) but not normal-weight individuals had a higher risk of stroke incidence. Conclusions- Slow walking pace was associated with a higher risk of stroke among participants over 64 years of age in this population-based cohort study. The addition of the measurement of self-reported walking pace to primary care or public health clinical consultations may be a useful screening tool for stroke risk.

Final Analysis of the Prevention of Early Menopause Study (POEMS)/SWOG Intergroup S0230

Premature menopause is a serious long-term side effect of chemotherapy. We evaluated long-term pregnancy and disease-related outcomes for patients in S0230/POEMS, a study in premenopausal women with stage I-IIIA estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer to be treated with cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy. Women were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy with or without goserelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, and were stratified by age and chemotherapy regimen. All statistical tests were two-sided. Of 257 patients, 218 were eligible and evaluable (105 in the chemotherapy + goserelin arm and 113 in the chemotherapy arm). More patients in the chemotherapy + goserelin arm reported at least one pregnancy vs the chemotherapy arm (5-year cumulative incidence = 23.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.3% to 31.9%; and 12.2%, 95% CI = 6.8% to 19.2%, respectively; odds ratio = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.07 to 5.11; P = .03). Randomization to goserelin + chemotherapy was associated with a nonstatistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.27 to 1.10; P = .09) and overall survival (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.04; P = .06). In this long-term analysis of POEMS/S0230, we found continued evidence that patients randomly assigned to receive goserelin + chemotherapy were not only more likely to avoid premature menopause, but were also more likely to become pregnant without adverse effect on disease-related outcomes.

Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Two large clinical trials have shown a reduced rate of breast cancer development in high-risk women in the initial 5 years of follow-up after use of aromatase inhibitors (MAP.3 and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II [IBIS-II]). Here, we report blinded long-term follow-up results for the IBIS-II trial, which compared anastrozole with placebo, with the objective of determining the efficacy of anastrozole for preventing breast cancer (both invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) in the post-treatment period.

METHODS

IBIS-II is an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either anastrozole (1 mg per day, oral) or matching placebo daily for 5 years. After treatment completion, women were followed on a yearly basis to collect data on breast cancer incidence, death, other cancers, and major adverse events (cardiovascular events and fractures). The primary outcome was all breast cancer.

FINDINGS

3864 women were recruited between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012. 1920 women were randomly assigned to 5 years anastrozole and 1944 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 131 months (IQR 105-156), a 49% reduction in breast cancer was observed for anastrozole (85 vs 165 cases, hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·39-0·66, p<0·0001). The reduction was larger in the first 5 years (35 vs 89, 0·39, 0·27-0·58, p<0·0001), but still significant after 5 years (50 vs 76 new cases, 0·64, 0·45-0·91, p=0·014), and not significantly different from the first 5 years (p=0·087). Invasive oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was reduced by 54% (HR 0·46, 95% CI 0·33-0·65, p<0·0001), with a continued significant effect in the period after treatment. A 59% reduction in ductal carcinoma in situ was observed (0·41, 0·22-0·79, p=0·0081), especially in participants known to be oestrogen receptor-positive (0·22, 0·78-0·65, p<0·0001). No significant difference in deaths was observed overall (69 vs 70, HR 0·96, 95% CI 0·69-1·34, p=0·82) or for breast cancer (two anastrozole vs three placebo). A significant decrease in non-breast cancers was observed for anastrozole (147 vs 200, odds ratio 0·72, 95% CI 0·57-0·91, p=0·0042), owing primarily to non-melanoma skin cancer. No excess of fractures or cardiovascular disease was observed.

INTERPRETATION

This analysis has identified a significant continuing reduction in breast cancer with anastrozole in the post-treatment follow-up period, with no evidence of new late side-effects. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on breast cancer mortality.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Sanofi Aventis, and AstraZeneca.

Dose intensity in anthracycline-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: mature results of the randomised clinical trial ANZ 9311

PURPOSE

The separate impacts of dose and dose intensity of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer remain uncertain. The primary objective of this trial was to compare a short, high-dose, intensive course of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) with a longer conventional dose regimen delivering the same total dose of chemotherapy.

METHODS

This open label trial randomised 235 women with metastatic breast cancer to receive either high-dose epirubicin 150 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m² with filgrastim support every 3 weeks for 3 cycles (HDEC) or standard dose epirubicin 75 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (SDEC). Primary outcomes were time to progression, overall survival and quality of life.

RESULTS

In 118 patients allocated HDEC 90% of the planned dose was delivered, compared to 96% in the 117 participants allocated SDEC. There were no significant differences in the time to disease progression (5.7 vs. 5.8 months, P = 0.19) or overall survival (14.5 vs. 16.5 months, P = 0.29) between HDEC and SDEC, respectively. Patients on HDEC reported worse quality of life during therapy, but scores improved after completion to approximate those reported by patients allocated SDEC. Objective tumour response was recorded in 33 (28%) on HDEC and 42 patients (36%) on SDEC. HDEC produced more haematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

For women with metastatic breast cancer, disease progression, survival or quality of life were no better with high-dose intensity compared to standard dose EC chemotherapy. Australian Clinical Trials Registry registration number ACTRN12605000478617.

A macroeconomic assessment of the impact of medical research expenditure: A case study of NIHR Biomedical Research Centres

Quantifying the value of investment in medical research can inform decision-making on the prioritisation of research programmes. Existing methodologies to estimate the rate of return of medical research are inappropriate for early-phase translational research due to censoring of health benefits and time lags. A strategy to improve the process of translational research for patient benefit has been initiated as part of the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) investment in Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs) in England. By providing a platform for partnership between universities, NHS trusts and industry, successful BRCs should reduce time lags within translational research whilst also providing an impetus for local economic growth through industry collaboration. We present a novel contribution in the assessment of early-phase biomedical research by estimating the impact of the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (OxBRC) on income and job creation following the initial NIHR investment. We adopt a macroeconomic assessment approach using Input-Output Analysis to estimate the value of medical research in terms of income and job creation during the early pathway towards translational biomedical research. Inter-industry linkages are assessed by building a model economy for the South East England region to estimate the return on investment of the OxBRC. The results from the input-output model estimate that the return on investment in biomedical research within the OxBRC is 46%. Each £1 invested in the OxBRC generates an additional £0.46 through income and job creation alone. Multiplicative employment effects following a marginal investment in the OxBRC of £98m during the period 2007-2017 result in an estimated additional 196 full time equivalent positions being created within the local economy on top of direct employment within OxBRC. Results from input-output analyses can be used to inform the prioritisation of biomedical research programmes when compared against national minimum thresholds of investment.

Abstract OT2-04-03: Examining personalized radiation therapy (EXPERT): A randomised phase III trial of adjuvant radiotherapy vs observation in patients with molecularly characterized luminal A breast cancer

Background

Radiation therapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is the current standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer. However, individual absolute recurrence risks and hence benefits of RT vary substantially. A study showed significant association between local recurrence (LR) risk and PAM50-defined intrinsic subtypes and Risk of Recurrence scores (ROR).1

The objective of EXPERT, a co-lead study of Breast Cancer Trials-Australia & New Zealand (BCT-ANZ), and Breast International Group (BIG), is to optimize local therapy for early breast cancer through precise individualized quantification of LR risk to identify patients for whom RT after BCS may be safely omitted.

Trial design

This is a randomized, non-inferiority, phase III study of women who plan to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy for Prosigna (PAM50)-defined luminal A breast cancer with ROR ≤60 resected by BCS.

Women are randomized to receive adjuvant whole breast RT and endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone and followed-up for 10 years after randomization.

Major eligibility criteria

Females aged ≥50 years; histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma ≤2 cm, grade 1 or 2, ER and PgR ≥10%, HER2-negative and node-negative; treated by BCS with negative margins for invasive carcinoma and associated DCIS; Prosigna (PAM50)-defined Luminal A subtype and ROR ≤60; and plan to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Specific aims

Primary: To determine if omission of RT is not inferior to RT in terms of LR-free interval after BCS.

Secondary: To evaluate the impact of omission of RT on regional, local-regional and distant recurrence-free interval; disease-free survival (DFS); invasive DFS; overall survival; salvage RT or mastectomy rate; toxicity; endocrine therapy adherence; patient reported outcomes; and health economic outcomes.

Statistical methods

An estimated 5-year LR rate in the target population is expected to be 1% with RT. A rate of 4% is considered non-inferior as a worthwhile trade-off against RT toxicity. Using O'Brien-Fleming boundary for rejecting non-inferiority, 29 LR events are required for final analysis expected 8 years after the first patient is randomized. Two interim analyses will be conducted after 10 and 21 events. If the stratified log-rank test statistic exceeds the upper boundary at interim or final analysis, the hypothesis of non-inferiority will be rejected and it will be concluded that no RT is inferior to RT.

Accrual: Target (1170), actual: 82 (June 2018)

The study was activated in Australia in August 2017, with global activation planned for Q4 2018. Recruitment is expected to be completed in 4.5 years.

Contact information

Professor Boon Chua, UNSW Sydney and Prince of Wales Hospital, NSW, Australia; email boon.chua@health.nsw.gov.au; T +61 2 49255239. Registration: NCT02889874

References

Fitzal F, Filipits M, Fesl C, et al. Predicting local recurrence using PAM50 in postmenopausal endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. JCO 2014;32(15 suppl):1008.

Citation Format: Chua BH, Gray K, Krishnasamy M, Regan M, Zdenkowski N, Loi S, Mann B, Forbes JF, Wilcken N, Spillane A, Martin A, Badger H, Jafari S, Fong A, Mavin C, Corachan S, Arahmani A, Martinez J-L, Francis P. Examining personalized radiation therapy (EXPERT): A randomised phase III trial of adjuvant radiotherapy vs observation in patients with molecularly characterized luminal A breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-03.

Abstract P1-15-01: Final analysis of SWOG S0230/Prevention of early menopause study (POEMS)

BACKGROUND: The SWOG S0230/POEMS study demonstrated a 70% reduction in ovarian failure (OF) with goserelin coadministration during chemotherapy (CT) for ER-negative early breast cancer (BC; Moore H et al, NEJM 2015). Goserelin use was also associated with more pregnancies as well as favorable disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Here we report the final analysis after 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS: Premenopausal women age &lt;50 with stage I-IIIA ER/PR-negative BC to be treated with cyclophosphamide-containing CT were randomized to receive standard CT with or without monthly goserelin 3.6 mg SQ starting at least 1 week prior to the first CT dose. The primary endpoint was OF at 2-years, defined as amenorrhea for the prior 6 months and post-menopausal FSH. Secondary endpoints included pregnancies, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). An unplanned analysis of rate of menses recovery at 2 years (presence of menses within 6 months of the 2 year time-point or pregnancy within the first 2 years) was also conducted. OF and pregnancy endpoints were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for stratification factors (age and CT regimen); DFS and OS were examined using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for stratification factors and stage. Two-sided p-values are reported unless otherwise specified in accordance with protocol design.

RESULTS: Among 257 randomized participants, 218 were eligible and evaluable. One hundred thirty-six eligible and evaluable patients had OF data and 186 had menstrual data. Median age was 37.7 years. Among the 136 patients with OF data, the odds ratio (OR) for OF at 2 years was 0.30 (95% CI 0.1-0.98; one-sided p=0.023) comparing CT with goserelin to standard CT alone. Among 186 patients with menstrual data, 80% recovered menses by 2 years in the goserelin arm compared with 70% in the standard arm (OR=1.74, 95% CI: 0.83-3.66, p=0.15). Pregnancies, DFS and OS are reported for all 218 eligible and evaluable patients. With a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 22% of patients in the goserelin group had at least one pregnancy compared with 12% in the standard group (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.08-5.26, p=0.03). Cumulative incidence of pregnancy at 5 years is 23% in the goserelin arm compared with 12% in the standard group. Five-year Kaplan-Meier DFS estimates are 88% in the goserelin arm compared with 79% in the standard arm (HR=0.50, p=0.05). Five-year OS is 92% with goserelin versus 83% in the standard arm (HR=0.47, p=0.06). Including all 257 randomized patients, HR for DFS and OS are 0.67 and 0.48 (p=0.18 and p=0.05).

CONCLUSION: Ovarian suppression with goserelin during chemotherapy for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer reduces OF risk and, after 5 years of follow-up, continues to be associated with more pregnancies and improved survival compared with chemotherapy without goserelin.

SUPPORT: NIH/NCI grant awards CA189974, CA180888, CA180819, CA074362; AstraZeneca

Citation Format: Moore HCF, Unger JM, Phillips K-A, Boyle F, Hitre E, Moseley A, Porter D, Francis PA, Goldstein LJ, Gomez HL, Vallejos CS, Partridge AH, Dakhil SR, Garcia AA, Gralow J, Lombard JM, Forbes JF, Martino S, Barlow WE, Fabian CJ, Minasian L, Meyskens FL, Gelber RD, Hortobagyi GN, Albain KS. Final analysis of SWOG S0230/Prevention of early menopause study (POEMS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-01.

Early participant-reported symptoms as predictors of adherence to anastrozole in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Studies II

Background

Anastrozole reduces breast cancer risk in women at high risk, but implementing preventive therapy in clinical practice is difficult. Here, we evaluate adherence to anastrozole in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS)-II prevention and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) trials, and its association with early symptoms.

Patients and methods

In the prevention trial, 3864 postmenopausal women were randomized to placebo versus anastrozole. A total of 2980 postmenopausal women with DCIS were randomized to tamoxifen versus anastrozole. Adherence to trial medication was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and all P-values were two-sided.

Results

In the prevention trial, adherence was 65.8% [anastrozole (65.7%) versus placebo (65.9%); HR = 0.97 (0.87-1.09), P = 0.6]. Adherence was lower for those reporting arthralgia in the placebo group (P = 0.02) or gynecological symptoms in the anastrozole group (P = 0.003), compared with those not reporting these symptoms at 6 months. In the DCIS study, adherence was 66.7% [anastrozole (67.5%) versus tamoxifen (65.8%); HR = 1.06 (0.94-1.20), P = 0.4]. Hot flashes were associated with greater adherence in the anastrozole arm (P = 0.02). In both studies, symptoms were mostly mild or moderately severe, and adherence decreased with increasing severity for most symptoms. Drop-outs were highest in the first 1.5 years of therapy in both trials.

Conclusions

In the IBIS-II prevention and DCIS trials, over two-thirds of women were adherent to therapy, with no differences by treatment groups. Participants who reported specific symptoms in the IBIS-II prevention trial had a small but significant effect on adherence, which strengthened as severity increased. Strategies to promote adherence should target the first year of preventive therapy.

Abstract P2-09-03: Long-term comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen: Results from LATTE/ATAC

Background: Previous reports from the Anastrozole Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial have shown significantly prolonged disease-free survival, lower rates of recurrence and distant recurrence, and reduced contralateral breast cancer in patients treated with anastrozole compared to tamoxifen (Cuzick et al., Lancet, 2010). Here, we compare the long-term effects of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients randomised to either monotherapy arm in the ATAC trial.

Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer randomised to anastrozole or tamoxifen in the main ATAC trial were eligible for the LATTE observational study. The primary objective was to compare the long-term effects of tamoxifen and anastrozole on time to recurrence and death beyond 10 years after randomisation. Secondary objectives included time to distant recurrence, cancer-specific survival, new breast primaries, other cancers, fractures, and cardiac/cerebrovascular events. Cox proportional hazard methods were used to compute hazard ratios (95% CI) for recurrence from the time of last publication (10 years median follow-up).

Results: 2452 women from 11 countries were entered into the LATTE study. 40 women withdrew consent and 759 women died or had a recurrence within 10 years, which left 1653 women for analysis (838 anastrozole vs. 815 tamoxifen). A total of 118 breast events (69 anastrozole (8.2%) vs. 49 tamoxifen (6.0%)) were reported. No significant difference between the two treatment arms were observed (HR=1.36 (0.94-1.97), P=0.098). 57 women had a distant recurrence (33 (3.9%) vs. 24 (2.9%)), 41 reported a loco-regional recurrence (23 (2.7%) vs. 18 (2.2%)), and 26 contra-lateral breast cancer were recorded (17 (2.0%) vs. 9 (1.1%)). None of the treatment comparisons were statistically significant. 305 deaths were recorded (147 (17.5%) vs. 158 (19.4%)), of which 31 were due to breast cancer. Significantly fewer gynaecological cancers were recorded with anastrozole (7 vs. 16; OR=0.42 (0.15-1.09), P=0.05), but overall the effect on other cancers was not significant (54 (6.4%) vs. 64 (7.9%). Fractures, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular events were evenly distributed between the treatment arms.

Conclusions: Although anastrozole was associated with significant fewer recurrences compared to tamoxifen in the first 10 years of follow-up, in this analysis, with limited number of patients, we could not find a significant difference between the two treatment arms.

Citation Format: Cuzick J, Sestak I, Bianco A, Strobbe L, Bergh J, Hanusch C, Neven P, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Buzdar A, Smith R, Howell A. Long-term comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen: Results from LATTE/ATAC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-03.

Abstract P6-03-03: Tropomyosin-related kinase A is overexpressed in HER2-positive breast cancers

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P1-09-06: Prognostic and predictive relevance of cell cycle progression (CCP) score in ductal carcinoma in situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial

Background: The prognostic abilities of most gene expression signatures in breast cancer are often due to detection of proliferative activity measured from expression of genes regulated as a function of cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle Progression (CCP) score is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer, and has shown promising results for renal and lung cancer; its role in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been explored. We investigated the prognostic and predictive relevance of CCP Score in DCIS using material from UK/ANZ DCIS trial.

Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues were collected from patients enrolled in the UK/ANZ DCIS trial, a randomised 2X2 factorial design trial investigating role of tamoxifen, radiotherapy (RT) or both as adjuvant treatment in DCIS. mRNA expression of 25 S- and M-phase CCP genes was evaluated by reverse transcription followed by PCR on customized Taqman low-density arrays. CCP score is an un-weighted average of the expression values of CCP genes after normalisation with 14 housekeeping genes. CCP score was analysed as a continuous variable and also as an ordinal variable using tertile-based cut-offs. Exploratory analyses with subgroups defined by HER2 status by immunohistochemistry were performed.

Results: CCP scores were evaluable in 521 (134 recurrence events) of 704 available samples (DCIS absent or insufficient RNA in 51, assay failure in 132). Increase in CCP score (median 1.15; IQR 0.71-1.74) was associated with increased risk of ipsilateral breast event (IBE) [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.28; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 1.08-1.51; p = 0.0049]. CCP score however was not an independent predictor in multivariate analyses [HR = 1.16; 95%CI 0.95-1.42; p = 0.14].

CCP scores were categorised as CCP low (&lt;0.87), CCP intermediate (&gt;/= 0.87 to &lt; 1.52) and CCP high (&gt;/= 1.52) by tertiles. The benefit of RT in reducing IBE was significant when CCP score was low [HR = 0.35; 95%CI 0.14-0.87; p = 0.024] or intermediate [HR = 0.23; 95%CI 0.09-0.59; p = 0.0023], however, those with high CCP score did not derive significant RT benefit [HR = 0.59; 95%CI 0.31-1.13; p = 0.11].

In exploratory subgroup analyses, HER2 negative DCIS with high CCP score (20.9% of all DCIS cases) did not derive RT benefit and the largest RT benefit was seen for DCIS that expressed HER2 and did not have a high CCP score (23.2% of all DCIS cases).

Benefit of RT and 10-year IBE rates by CCP score (categorised) and HER2 status subgroups.SubgroupneventsHR (95%CI)p10-year IBE rates (%) - No RT10-year IBE rates (%) - RTCCP-high & HER2 neg106220.83 (0.35-1.97)0.6722.5 (14.0-35.0)20.0 (10.5-36.0)CCP-high & HER2 pos67210.43 (0.16-1.17)0.09840.6 (27.1-57.6)20.4 (8.9-42.9)CCP-non-High & HER2 neg217300.43 (0.18-0.99)0.04816.2 (10.7-24.0)8.1 (4.0-16.3)CCP- non-High & HER2 pos118330.14 (0.04-0.46)0.001239.5 (29.3-51.6)7.1 (2.3-20.4)CCP-non-High = low or intermediate CCP score

Conclusions: CCP score is not independently associated with the risk of IBE but appears to be a predictor of RT benefit. Exploratory analyses suggest that combined with HER2 status, it may help in identifying a large DCIS subgroup where RT is highly indicated and another large subgroup where mastectomy may be merited.

Citation Format: Thorat MA, Wagner S, Jones LJ, Levey PM, Bulka K, Hoff R, Sangale Z, Flake II DD, Bundred NJ, Fentiman IS, Forbes JF, Lanchbury JS, Cuzick J. Prognostic and predictive relevance of cell cycle progression (CCP) score in ductal carcinoma in situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-06.

Treatment Adherence and Its Impact on Disease-Free Survival in the Breast International Group 1-98 Trial of Tamoxifen and Letrozole, Alone and in Sequence

PURPOSE

To investigate adherence to endocrine treatment and its relationship with disease-free survival (DFS) in the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 clinical trial.

METHODS

The BIG 1-98 trial is a double-blind trial that randomly assigned 6,193 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in the four-arm option to 5 years of tamoxifen (Tam), letrozole (Let), or the agents in sequence (Let-Tam, Tam-Let). This analysis included 6,144 women who received at least one dose of study treatment. Conditional landmark analyses and marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between DFS and treatment adherence (persistence [duration] and compliance with dosage). Competing risks regression was used to assess demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics of the women who stopped treatment early because of adverse events.

RESULTS

Both aspects of low adherence (early cessation of letrozole and a compliance score of < 90%) were associated with reduced DFS (multivariable model hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.93; P = .01; and multivariable model hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.38; P = .02, respectively). Sequential treatments were associated with higher rates of nonpersistence (Tam-Let, 20.8%; Let-Tam, 20.3%; Tam 16.9%; Let 17.6%). Adverse events were the reason for most trial treatment early discontinuations (82.7%). Apart from sequential treatment assignment, reduced adherence was associated with older age, smoking, node negativity, or prior thromboembolic event.

CONCLUSION

Both persistence and compliance are associated with DFS. Toxicity management and, for sequential treatments, patient and physician awareness, may improve adherence.

Adjuvant ovarian function suppression and cognitive function in women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

To examine the effect on cognitive function of adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) for breast cancer.

METHODS

The Suppression of Ovarian Function (SOFT) trial randomised premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to 5 years adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen+OFS, exemestane+OFS or tamoxifen alone. The Co-SOFT substudy assessed objective cognitive function and patient reported outcomes at randomisation (T0), and 1 year later (T1); the primary endpoint was change in global cognitive function, measured by the composite objective cognitive function score. Data were compared for the pooled tamoxifen+OFS and exemestane+OFS groups vs the tamoxifen alone group using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Of 86 participants, 74 underwent both T0 and T1 cognitive testing; 54 randomised to OFS+ either tamoxifen (28) or exemestane (26) and 20 randomised to tamoxifen alone. There was no significant difference in the changes in the composite cognitive function scores between the OFS+ tamoxifen or exemestane groups and the tamoxifen group (mean±s.d., -0.21±0.92 vs -0.04±0.49, respectively, P=0.71, effect size=-0.20), regardless of prior chemotherapy status, and adjusting for baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Co-SOFT study, although limited by small samples size, provides no evidence that adding OFS to adjuvant oral endocrine therapy substantially affects global cognitive function.

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen for preventing recurrence in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. However, it is not known whether anastrozole is more effective than tamoxifen for women with hormone-receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we compare the efficacy of anastrozole with that of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS.

METHODS

In a double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial, we recruited women who had been diagnosed with locally excised, hormone-receptor-positive DCIS. Eligible women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by central computer allocation to receive 1 mg oral anastrozole or 20 mg oral tamoxifen every day for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by major centre or hub and was done in blocks (six, eight, or ten). All trial personnel, participants, and clinicians were masked to treatment allocation and only the trial statistician had access to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was all recurrence, including recurrent DCIS and new contralateral tumours. All analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis (in all women who were randomised and did not revoke consent for their data to be included) and proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN37546358.

RESULTS

Between March 3, 2003, and Feb 8, 2012, we enrolled 2980 postmenopausal women from 236 centres in 14 countries and randomly assigned them to receive anastrozole (1449 analysed) or tamoxifen (1489 analysed). Median follow-up was 7·2 years (IQR 5·6-8·9), and 144 breast cancer recurrences were recorded. We noted no statistically significant difference in overall recurrence (67 recurrences for anastrozole vs 77 for tamoxifen; HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·64-1·23]). The non-inferiority of anastrozole was established (upper 95% CI <1·25), but its superiority to tamoxifen was not (p=0·49). A total of 69 deaths were recorded (33 for anastrozole vs 36 for tamoxifen; HR 0·93 [95% CI 0·58-1·50], p=0·78), and no specific cause was more common in one group than the other. The number of women reporting any adverse event was similar between anastrozole (1323 women, 91%) and tamoxifen (1379 women, 93%); the side-effect profiles of the two drugs differed, with more fractures, musculoskeletal events, hypercholesterolaemia, and strokes with anastrozole and more muscle spasm, gynaecological cancers and symptoms, vasomotor symptoms, and deep vein thromboses with tamoxifen.

CONCLUSIONS

No clear efficacy differences were seen between the two treatments. Anastrozole offers another treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS, which may be be more appropriate for some women with contraindications for tamoxifen. Longer follow-up will be necessary to fully evaluate treatment differences.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Fund, AstraZeneca, Sanofi Aventis.

Abstract S6-03: Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of loco-regional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in-situ (IBIS-II DCIS)

Background: Third generation aromatase inhibitors are a more effective treatment option than tamoxifen for hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, it is not known whether anastrozole is more effective than tamoxifen in preventing the recurrence of breast cancer in women with hormone receptor (HR) positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we compare the efficacy of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with HR positive DCIS.

Methods: A multi-centre randomised placebo-controlled trial of 1mg/day anastrozole (oral) vs. 20mg/day tamoxifen (oral) for five years was conducted in 2980 postmenopausal women with locally excised HR positive DCIS. The primary endpoint was to determine if anastrozole is at least as effective as tamoxifen in loco-regional control and prevention of contralateral disease. Secondary endpoints included breast cancer mortality, other cancers, cardiovascular disease, fractures, adverse events and non-breast cancer deaths. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis and Cox proportional hazard were used to compute hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals for recurrence.

Results: Between 2003 and 2012, a total of 2980 postmenopausal women were recruited into the IBIS-II DCIS trial. 1471 women were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole and 1509 women tamoxifen. Median follow-up for this first analysis is 6.8 years and 131 breast cancer recurrences have been recorded. Median age was 60.3 years (56.1-64.6), median BMI was 26.7 (23.6-30.7), and 45.6% of women had used hormone replacement therapy (HRT) before joining the trial. Of the 131 women with recurrent disease, 77 had a loco-regional recurrence and 51 reported contralateral disease. A total of 61 deaths were recorded. We will present a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of anastrozole and tamoxifen for preventing loco-regional/contralateral breast cancer and major adverse events by intention to treat (ITT).

Conclusions: To follow.

Citation Format: Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A, Bonanni B, Bundred N, Levy C, von Minckwitz G, Eiermann W, Neven P, Stierer M, Holcombe C, Coleman RE, Jones LJ, Ellis I. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of loco-regional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in-situ (IBIS-II DCIS). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-03.

Abstract P3-07-02: Prognostic and predictive relevance of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial

Background:

As compared to invasive breast cancer (IBC), HER2 is much more frequently overexpressed in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Unlike IBC, the prognostic significance of HER2 overexpression remains to be established in DCIS and large studies to investigate its predictive role are lacking. We investigated the prognostic and predictive relevance of HER2 protein and ERBB2 mRNA expression in DCIS using material from UK/ANZ DCIS trial.

Methods:

Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues (FFPETs) were collected from patients enrolled in the UK/ANZ DCIS trial, a randomised 2X2 factorial design trial investigating role of tamoxifen, radiotherapy or both as adjuvant treatment in DCIS. ERBB2 mRNA expression was evaluated by reverse transcription followed by PCR on customized Taqman low-density arrays. ERBB2 mRNA expression was analysed as a continuous variable and also as a binary variable using a cut-off to reproduce HER2 expression distribution similar to that observed with immunohistochemistry (IHC). HER2 protein expression was evaluated by IHC using HercepTest™ and scored as per ASCO-CAP 2013 recommendations; HER2 equivocal (IHC2+) were grouped with HER2 negative (IHC 0 or 1+) for main analyses. Additional analyses using binary ERBB2 mRNA expression as a reflex test for HER2 IHC2+ were also performed.

Results:

HER2 protein expression was evaluable in 713 (181 events) of 755 available samples (DCIS absent or lost during assay in 42). ERBB2 mRNA expression was evaluable in 521 (134 events) of 704 available samples (DCIS absent or insufficient RNA in 51, assay failure in 132). Both results were available in 508 cases (130 events). Increase in ERBB2 mRNA expression (median 0.62; range 0.07-36.76) was associated with increased risk of in situ ipsilateral breast event (DCIS-IBE) [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 1.04-1.10; p &lt; 0.0001] but not with increased risk of invasive ipsilateral breast event (I-IBE) [HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.97-1.10; p = 0.3209]. HER2 positivity by IHC was similarly associated with increased risk of DCIS-IBE [HR = 2.90; 95%CI 1.91-4.40; p &lt; 0.0001] but not with increased risk of I-IBE [HR = 1.40; 95%CI 0. 0.81-2.42; p = 0.2313]. Reclassification of HER2 IHC2+ cases using binary ERBB2 mRNA expression (46 as negative, 16 as positive; 18 expression data unavailable) further improved prognostic discrimination of HER2 IHC [ΔX2 (1d.f.) 5.51; p = 0.0189] for any recurrence. The effect of radiotherapy (RT) for reducing I-IBE was greater in HER2 positive (by ERBB2 mRNA expression) cases [HR = 0.24; 95%CI 0.07-0.83; p = 0.0237] as compared with HER2 negative cases [HR = 0.60; 95%CI 0.23-1.55; p = 0.2925]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 10-year I-IBE rates with and without RT were 4.5% (2.5%-1.4%) and 15.8% (9.6%-25.3%) in HER2 positive DCIS; rates in HER negative DCIS were 5.2% (2.1%-2.4%) and 7.3% (4.3%-12.2%) respectively. The differential benefit of RT by HER2 status was also seen for reduction in DCIS-IBE.

Conclusions:

HER2 overexpression is associated with increased risk of DCIS-IBE but not of I-IBE. HER2 status is predictive of radiotherapy response with larger reductions in both I-IBE and DCIS-IBE seen in HER2 positive DCIS.

Citation Format: Thorat MA, Wagner S, Jones LJ, Levey PM, Bulka K, Hoff R, Sangale Z, Flake II DD, Bundred NJ, Fentiman IS, Forbes JF, Lanchbury JS, Cuzick J. Prognostic and predictive relevance of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-02.

Abstract S4-06: HER2 status as predictive marker for AI vs Tam benefit: A TRANS-AIOG meta-analysis of 12129 patients from ATAC, BIG 1-98 and TEAM with centrally determined HER2

There is now significant evidence emerging from the pivotal trials of AIs versus Tamoxifen (AIOG) demonstrating the value of meta-analysis of key clinical questions. The "Trans-AIOG" group has been tasked with the exploration of key molecular/biomarker questions that are pertinent to meta-analyses of biomarkers (past/present/future) in AIOG trials. HER2 has been long proposed as a marker of endocrine "resistance". Data from three trials, before the era of HER-directed therapy, suggest a potential role for HER2 to select patients for treatment with upfront AIs. However the individual trials lack power to test treatment-by-HER2 interaction due to sample size and low HER2+ve rates. A meta-analysis of the predictive value of HER2 status, specifically within the first 3 years of endocrine therapy, has the potential to inform patient selection for upfront or sequential strategies with AIs. The pre-existing standardization of methodology for HER2 (IHC/FISH) facilitates analysis of existing data from BIG-1-98, TEAM and ATAC for this key marker.

Analysis plan: Following a prospectively-designed analysis plan, patient-level data from 3 randomized phase III trials (ATAC, BIG 1-98, TEAM) comparing AIs to tamoxifen during the first 2-3 years of adjuvant treatment were collected at the CRCTU (Birmingham UK), accounting for both the established time-dependency of relapse in HER2+ve, anti-endocrine treated patients and to address the clinical question of "upfront" vs "sequential" strategies for AIs. For each trial, covariate-adjusted Cox models estimated HER2-by-treatment (AI vs Tam) interaction on distant recurrence-free interval-censored at 2-2.75 years follow-up. A meta-analysis of the HER2-by-treatment interaction terms and of treatment effects according to HER2 status was performed.

Results: 12129 patients with centrally-confirmed ER and HER2 status, 1092 (9%) HER2+ve, with 473 (4%; 111 among HER2+ve) distant recurrences were analyzed. The meta-analysis estimated a pooled HER2-by-treatment interaction of 1.61 (95% CI 1.01,2.57), reflecting treatment effect hazard ratio(AI/Tam) of HR=1.13 (0.75,1.71) among HER2+ve and HR=0.70 (0.56,0.87) among HER2-ve. There was heterogeneity among interaction terms (I-squared=59%, p=.09) that resulted from treatment effect heterogeneity among HER2+ve subgroup (I2=71%, p=.03), not the HER2-ve subgroup (I2=0%). The results for disease-free survival were similar.

Conclusion: An individual patient data meta-analysis across 3 trials (ATAC, BIG 1-98, TEAM) conducted prior to standard use of HER2-directed adjuvant therapy demonstrated a marginally-significant interaction between HER2 status and treatment with AIs vs Tamoxifen in the 2-2.75 years prior to potential "switching" between Tamoxifen and AIs. Patients with HER2-ve cancers experienced improved outcomes when treated with AIs vs Tamoxifen whilst patients with HER+ve cancers fared no better, or slightly worse, during AI treatment. However, the small number of HER2+ve cancers and events even in this meta-analysis may explain a large degree of heterogeneity in the treatment effects within the HER2+ve subgroups across the 3 trials. Other causes, perhaps related to subtle differences between AIs, cannot be excluded.

Citation Format: Bartlett JMS, Ahmed I, Regan MM, Sestak I, Mallon EA, Dell'Orto P, Thürlimann BJK, Seynaeve C, Putter H, Brookes CL, Forbes JF, Colleoni MA, Bayani J, van de Velde CJH, Viale G, Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Rea DW, On Behalf of the Translational Aromatase Inhibitor Overview Group (Trans-AIOG). HER2 status as predictive marker for AI vs Tam benefit: A TRANS-AIOG meta-analysis of 12129 patients from ATAC, BIG 1-98 and TEAM with centrally determined HER2. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-06.

Observation versus late reintroduction of letrozole as adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ANZ0501 LATER): an open-label randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy in preventing breast cancer recurrence, breast cancer events continue at a high rate for at least 10 years after completion of therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomised open label phase III trial recruited postmenopausal women from 29 Australian and New Zealand sites, with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer, who had completed ≥4 years of endocrine therapy [aromatase inhibitor (AI), tamoxifen, ovarian suppression, or sequential combination] ≥1 year prior, to oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily for 5 years, or observation. Treatment allocation was by central computerised randomisation, stratified by institution, axillary node status and prior endocrine therapy. The primary outcome was invasive breast cancer events (new invasive primary, local, regional or distant recurrence, or contralateral breast cancer), analysed by intention to treat. The secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Between 16 May 2007 and 14 March 2012, 181 patients were randomised to letrozole and 179 to observation (median age 64.3 years). Endocrine therapy was completed at a median of 2.6 years before randomisation, and 47.5% had tumours of >2 cm and/or node positive. At 3.9 years median follow-up (interquartile range 3.1-4.8), 2 patients assigned letrozole (1.1%) and 17 patients assigned observation (9.5%) had experienced an invasive breast cancer event (difference 8.4%, 95% confidence interval 3.8% to 13.0%, log-rank test P = 0.0004). Twenty-four patients (13.4%) in the observation and 14 (7.7%) in the letrozole arm experienced a DFS event (log-rank P = 0.067). Adverse events linked to oestrogen depletion, but not serious adverse events, were more common with letrozole.

CONCLUSION

These results should be considered exploratory, but lend weight to emerging data supporting longer duration endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and offer insight into reintroduction of AI therapy.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au), ACTRN12607000137493.

Annual Hazard Rates of Recurrence for Breast Cancer During 24 Years of Follow-Up: Results From the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V

PURPOSE

Predicting the pattern of recurrence can aid in the development of targeted surveillance and treatment strategies. We identified patient populations that remain at risk for an event at a median follow-up of 24 years from the diagnosis of operable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials I to V randomly assigned 4,105 patients between 1978 and 1985. Annualized hazards were estimated for breast cancer-free interval (primary end point), disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

For the entire group, the annualized hazard of recurrence was highest during the first 5 years (10.4%), with a peak between years 1 and 2 (15.2%). During the first 5 years, patients with estrogen receptor (ER)--positive disease had a lower annualized hazard compared with those with ER-negative disease (9.9% v 11.5%; P = .01). However, beyond 5 years, patients with ER-positive disease had higher hazards (5 to 10 years: 5.4% v 3.3%; 10 to 15 years: 2.9% v 1.3%; 15 to 20 years: 2.8% v 1.2%; and 20 to 25 years: 1.3% v 1.4%; P < .001). Among patients with ER-positive disease, annualized hazards of recurrence remained elevated and fairly stable beyond 10 years, even for those with no axillary involvement (2.0%, 2.1%, and 1.1% for years 10 to 15, 15 to 20, and 20 to 25, respectively) and for those with one to three positive nodes (3.0%, 3.5%, and 1.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ER-positive breast cancer maintain a significant recurrence rate during extended follow up. Strategies for follow up and treatments to prevent recurrences may be most efficiently applied and studied in patients with ER-positive disease followed for a long period of time.

Anastrozole-Induced Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Results From the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II Prevention Trial

PURPOSE

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs when the median nerve is compressed at the wrist in the carpal tunnel. It has been suggested that hormonal risk factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of CTS, and a higher incidence of CTS has been reported in randomized clinical trials with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) compared with tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an exploratory analysis of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II, a double-blind randomized clinical trial in which women at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole or placebo. This is the first report of risk factors for and characteristics of CTS in women taking an AI in a placebo-controlled trial.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 participants with CTS were observed: 65 (3.4%) in the anastrozole arm and 31 (1.6%) in the placebo arm (odds ratio, 2.16 [1.40 to 3.33]; P < .001). Ten participants were reported as having severe CTS, of which eight were taking anastrozole (P = .08). Eighteen women (0.9%) in the anastrozole arm and six women (0.3%) in the placebo arm reported surgical intervention, which was significantly different (odds ratio, 3.06 [1.21 to 7.72], P = .018). Six women discontinued with the allocated treatment because of the onset of CTS. Apart from treatment allocation, a high body mass index and an a prior report of musculoskeletal symptoms after trial entry were the only other risk factors for CTS identified in these postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anastrozole was associated with a higher incidence of CTS but few participants required surgery. Further investigations are warranted into the risk factors and treatment of AI-induced CTS.

Aromatase inhibitor induced musculoskeletal syndrome: a significant problem with limited treatment options

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitor induced musculoskeletal syndrome is experienced by approximately half of women taking aromatase inhibitors, impairing quality of life and leading some to discontinue treatment. Evidence for effective treatments is lacking. We aimed to understand the manifestations and impact of this syndrome in the Australian breast cancer community, and strategies used for its management.

METHODS

A survey invitation was sent to 2390 members of the Breast Cancer Network Australia Review and Survey Group in April 2014. The online questionnaire included 45 questions covering demographics, aromatase inhibitor use, clinical manifestations and risk factors for the aromatase inhibitor musculoskeletal syndrome, reasons for treatment discontinuation and efficacy of interventions used.

RESULTS

Aromatase inhibitor induced musculoskeletal syndrome was reported by 302 (82 %) of 370 respondents. Twenty-seven percent had discontinued treatment for any reason and of these, 68 % discontinued because of the musculoskeletal syndrome. Eighty-one percent had used at least one intervention from the following three categories to manage the syndrome: doctor prescribed medications, over-the-counter/complementary medicines or alternative/non-drug therapies. Anti-inflammatories, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and yoga were most successful in relieving symptoms in each of the respective categories. Almost a third of respondents reported that one or more interventions helped prevent aromatase inhibitor discontinuation. However, approximately 20 % of respondents found no intervention effective in any category.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that aromatase inhibitor induced musculoskeletal syndrome is a significant issue for Australian women and is an important reason for treatment discontinuation. Women use a variety of interventions to manage this syndrome; however, their efficacy appears limited.