An Analysis of Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic Urinary Tract Tumors to Identify Predictors of Response

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To identify selection criteria linked to outcomes in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic tumors of the urinary tract (UT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Single institution retrospective analysis of SBRT treated patients for oligometastatic/progressive UT tumors from 2006-2022. Charts were queried for M1 status at diagnosis or during disease course, treatment details (surgery, SBRT, systemic therapy), metabolic status (diabetes [DM], BMI) and outcomes. A linear quadratic formula was used to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED) using an α/β of 10 for tumor. Descriptive statistics portrayed the cohort, and analyses were done at patient and site level. Time-to-event analyses, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from SBRT, were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) to identify predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were treated at 44 metastatic sites, including: bone (25%), node (36.4%), lung (20.5%), soft tissue (13.6%) and liver (4.5%). Most were male (74.3%) with a median age of 70 (range: 51-89), without DM (60%) having a median BMI of 29.8, and ECOG <2 (97.1%) at time of SBRT. Six (17.1%) patients were M1 at diagnosis. Of the 29 non-M1 patients, 86.2% received definitive local therapy (LT), 58.6% had at least T3/N+ disease, 75.8% received systemic therapy with a median of 2 agents (range: 1-6) prior to SBRT. Sixteen (45.7%) received immunotherapy (IO) with most receiving this before (75%) and after (56.2%) SBRT. Six patients had positive PD-L1 status (n = 10). The median RT dose, fractionation and BED was 40 Gy (range: 14-46), 5 fractions, and 72 (range: 28-132), respectively. At a median follow-up of 34.8, the median OS was 18.4 m (range: 9.3-27.4) with a 2-year OS of 35.9%. At patient level, 62.8% recurred after SBRT. The median PFS after SBRT was 5.3 m (range: 1.8-8.7) with a 2-yr PFS of 29.3%. Patient-level PFS was improved with LT (6.7 vs 1.4 m; p = 0.001) and DM (NR vs 2.9 m; p = 0.015), whereas improved OS was related with LT (18.9 vs 6.6 m; p = 0.03), DM (p = 0.04), ECOG (p = 0.004), and no relapse after SBRT (NR vs 9.8 m; p <0.001). Exposure to < 3 systemic agents prior to SBRT portended better PFS (6.7 vs 2.6 m; p = 0.04) without any impact by IO. At site level, 20.4% of sites had local relapse with 4 being the first event. Site was related with PFS (p = 0.009) with order of increased relapse risk being liver > bone > soft tissue > node > lung. No dosimetric feature was related with recurrence risk. On MVA, both DM (p = 0.02) and LT (p = 0.002) were predictive for PFS. Only recurrence after SBRT predicted for OS on MVA (HR: 6.7, 95% CI: 1.4-31; p = 0.014). In the IO subset, median PFS was 5.3 m and OS was 9.4 m, with no difference seen with IO-SBRT sequence or PDL1 status.

CONCLUSION

Optimized selection criteria for metastasis-directed therapy in patients with UT tumors is unclear, notably with IO. Future studies may benefit by assessing circulating tumor markers prior to SBRT.

Oncogeriatric Developments

Cancer is a disease of aging and is rapidly becoming the number one cause of mortality in older people. Over their lifetime, one in two men and one in three women will develop a cancer, with half of the risk being beyond the age of seventy. Therefore, cancer is a problem frequently encountered by geriatricians. In this article, we review a few recent progresses that will be of interest to the geriatric community. First, we now have robust evidence that a comprehensive geriatric assessment and management change outcomes in older cancer patients, notably allowing decreased treatment toxicity, better treatment completion, and increased functional outcomes. In gastrointestinal cancers and breast cancer, several recent studies have addressed when treatment intensity can be decreased, and when it cannot. New treatments for acute myeloid leukemia are finally beginning to improve outcomes for older patients and such patients should be referred to oncologists for management. In prostate cancer, new imaging techniques (e.g., PSMA scan) and treatment options can allow better treatment targeting and spare some hormonal and chemotherapy toxicity. Finally, we review recent public policy efforts to address the epidemiologic wave of cancer in older patients on a global scale.

Patient-reported outcomes in immunotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Data about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are sparse. Our exploratory study evaluated PROs in patients with HNSCC starting treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with cetuximab.

METHODS

Patients were recruited prior to receipt of their first checkpoint inhibitor therapy infusion. Participants completed measures of checkpoint inhibitor toxicities and quality of life (QOL) at on-treatment clinic visits.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (n = 48) or combination therapy (n = 38) toxicity increased over time (p < 0.05), while overall QOL improved from baseline to 12 weeks, with stable or declining QOL thereafter (p < 0.05). There were no group differences in change in toxicity index or QOL. Toxicity index scores were significantly higher in the combination group at 18-20 weeks and 6 months post-initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (p < 0.05). There were no significant group differences at baseline, the 6-8 week (p = 0.13) or 3-month (p = 0.09) evaluations. The combination group reported better emotional well-being at baseline than the monotherapy group (p = 0.04), There were no other group differences QOL at baseline or later timepoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing patient-reported toxicity, checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with similar transient improvements, then worsening, of QOL in patients with HNSCC.

Phase II multi-institutional clinical trial result of concurrent cetuximab and nivolumab in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial was conducted to determine overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with a combination of cetuximab and nivolumab.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with R/M HNSCC were treated with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV Day (D) -14 as a lead-in followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m2 IV and nivolumab 240 mg IV on D1 and D15 of each 28-D cycle. Expression of p16 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in archived tumors were determined. Tumor-tissue-modified human papillomavirus (TTMV) DNA was quantified in plasma.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were enrolled, and 88 patients were evaluable for OS with a median follow-up of 15.9 months. Median OS in the 45 patients who had prior therapy for R/M HNSCC (Cohort A) was 11.4 months, with a 1-year OS 50% (90% CI, 0.43-0.57). Median OS in the 43 patients who had no prior therapy (Cohort B) was 20.2 months, with a 1-year OS 66% (90% CI, 0.59-0.71). In the combined cohorts, the p16-negative immunostaining was associated with higher response rate (RR, p=0.02) but did not impact survival while higher PD-L1 combined positive score was associated with higher RR (p=0.03) and longer OS (log-rank p=0.04). In the p16-positive patients, median (log-rank p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of cetuximab and nivolumab is effective in patients with both previously treated and untreated R/M HNSCC and warrants further evaluation.

The impact of age on outcome in phase III NRG Oncology/RTOG trials of radiotherapy (XRT) +/- systemic therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the role age plays in the treatment and prognosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treated definitively with radiation alone or combined modality therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of three NRG/RTOG trials examining either radiation alone or combined radiation and systemic therapy for LAHNC. The effect of age (≥70 yrs.) on cause-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2688 patients were analyzed, of whom 309 patients (11.5%) were ≥ 70. For all studies combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.14-1.55, p < 0.001). For OS, the HR for patients age ≥ 70 vs. those <70 for all studies combined was 1.55 (95% CI 1.35-1.77, p < 0.001). After adjustment for all covariates, age ≥ 70 was associated with worse OS regardless of adjustment for smoking and p16 status. The survival difference was more pronounced in those receiving combined radiation and systemic therapy. Hematologic and renal toxicities were increased in combined modality trials in patients ≥70 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients age ≥ 70 with LAHNC were underrepresented in these clinical trials. Their CSS and OS proved inferior to patients <70 years old.

Abstract 5751: Patient-reported toxicities in head and neck cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e. nivolumab, pembrolizumab) are FDA-approved agents used in the treatment of various head and neck malignancies. While much is known about clinician-rated adverse clinical events of these immunotherapies from clinical trials, less is known about patient-reported toxicities. The goal of the current study was to describe patient-reported toxicities in patients receiving ICIs for head and neck cancer.

Methods: Patients with head and neck cancer were recruited as part of a larger study on quality of life on ICIs. Prior to initiation of ICIs, participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and a measure of symptomatic toxicities of ICIs developed based on input form providers, patients, and caregivers. Patients completed follow-up symptom assessments every 6-8 weeks until cancer progression. Severity of each symptom over the past 7 days was rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 0 = “not at all,” 4 = “very much”). A score of 3 or 4 was considered moderate to severe symptomatology.

Results: There were 45 patients (22% female; M age = 62), who completed a least 2 symptom assessments before cancer progression. The five most common moderate to severe symptoms at baseline were fatigue (27%), changes in taste (18%), insomnia (16%), coughing (11%), and muscle aches (9%). At the assessment before cancer progression, the five most common moderate to severe symptoms were fatigue (38%), insomnia (24%), rash (13%), cough (13%), and numbness in hands and feet (13%). From the baseline assessment to the last symptom assessment preceding progression, most patients reported worsening skin dryness (49%), skin sensitivity (46%), weakness in arms of legs (46%), and itching (42%). Most patients also reported worsening fatigue (49%), although a large subset reported improvements in fatigue (36%).

Conclusion: Results indicate that fatigue and insomnia are the most common and severe patient-reported toxicities of ICIs for head and neck cancer. These preliminary findings warrant larger future studies with longer follow-up to better understand changes in patient-reported toxicities in this population.

Citation Format: Brian W. James, Aasha I. Hoogland, Nathaly Irizarry-Arroyo, Jameel Muzaffar, Kedar Kirtane, Julie A. Kish, Heather S. Jim, Christine H. Chung. Patient-reported toxicities in head and neck cancer patients treated with immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5751.

Using Big Data in oncology to prospectively impact clinical patient care: A proof of concept study

OBJECTIVE

Big Data is widely seen as a major opportunity for progress in the practice of personalized medicine, attracting the attention from medical societies and presidential teams alike as it offers a unique opportunity to enlarge the base of evidence, especially for older patients underrepresented in clinical trials. This study prospectively assessed the real-time availability of clinical cases in the Health & Research Informatics Total Cancer Care™ (TCC) database matching community patients with cancer, and the impact of such a consultation on treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70 and older seen at the Lynn Cancer Institute (LCI) with a documented malignancy were eligible. Geriatric screening information and the oncologist's pre-consultation treatment plan were sent to Moffitt. A search for similar patients was done in TCC and additional information retrieved from Electronic Medical Records. A report summarizing the data was sent and the utility of such a consultation was assessed per email after the treatment decision.

RESULTS

Thirty one patients were included. The geriatric screening was positive in 87.1% (27) of them. The oncogeriatric consultation took on average 2.2 working days. It influenced treatment in 38.7% (12), and modified it in 19.4% (6). The consultation was perceived as "somewhat" to "very useful" in 83.9% (26).

CONCLUSION

This study establishes a proof of concept of the feasibility of real time use of Big Data for clinical practice. The geriatric screening and the consultation report influenced treatment in 38.7% of cases and modified it in 19.4%, which compares very well with oncogeriatric literature. Additional steps are needed to render it financially and clinically viable.

Patient choice for high-volume center radiation impacts head and neck cancer outcome

Background

Studies suggest treatment outcomes may vary between high (HVC)‐ and low‐volume centers (LVC). Radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) requires weeks of treatment, the inconvenience of which may influence a patient's choice for treatment location. We hypothesized that receipt of RT for HNC at a HVC would influence outcomes compared to patients evaluated at a HVC, but who chose to receive RT at a LVC.

Methods

From 1998 to 2011, 1930 HNC patients were evaluated at a HVC and then treated with RT at either a HVC or LVC. Time‐to‐event outcomes and treatment factors were compared.

Results

Median follow‐up was 34 months. RT was delivered at a HVC for 1368 (71%) patients and at a LVC in 562 (29%). Patients were more likely to choose HVC‐RT if they resided in the HVC's county or required definitive RT (all P < 0.001). HVC‐RT was associated with a significant improvement in 3‐year LRC (84% vs 68%), DFS (68% vs 48%), and OS (72% vs 57%) (all P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis (MVA), HVC‐RT independently predicted for improved LRC, DFS, and OS (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients evaluated at a HVC, the choice of RT location was primarily influenced by their residing distance from the HVC. HVC‐RT was associated with improvements in LRC, DFS, and OS in HNC. As treatment planning and delivery are technically demanding in HNC, the choice to undergo treatment at a HVC may result in more optimal delivered dose, RT duration, and outcome.

Antitumor Activity of Nivolumab in Recurrent and Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An International, Multicenter Study of the Mayo Clinic Phase 2 Consortium (NCI-9742)

Purpose This multinational study evaluated the antitumor activity of nivolumab in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Tumor and plasma-based biomarkers were investigated in an exploratory analysis. Patients and Methods Patients with multiply pretreated recurrent or metastatic NPC were treated with nivolumab until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included survival and toxicity. The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and human leukocyte antigens A and B in archived tumors and plasma clearance of Epstein-Barr virus DNA were correlated with ORR and survival. Results A total of 44 patients were evaluated and the overall ORR was 20.5% (complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 8). Nine patients received nivolumab for > 12 months (20%). The 1-year overall survival rate was 59% (95% CI, 44.3% to 78.5%) and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 19.3% (95% CI, 10.1% to 37.2%). There was no statistical correlation between ORR and the biomarkers; however, a descriptive analysis showed that the proportion of patients who responded was higher among those with PD-L1 positive tumors (> 1% expression) than those with PD-L1-negative tumors. The loss of expression of one or both human leukocyte antigen class 1 proteins was associated with better PFS than when both proteins were expressed (1-year PFS, 30.9% v 5.6%; log-rank P = .01). There was no association between survival and PD-L1 expression or plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA clearance. There was no unexpected toxicity to nivolumab. Conclusion Nivolumab has promising activity in NPC and the 1-year overall survival rate compares favorably with historic data in similar populations. Additional evaluation in a randomized setting is warranted. The biomarker results were hypothesis generating and validation in larger cohorts is needed.

The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment

Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.

Increased acute mortality with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in patients ≥70years

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for many sites of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNC). However, on meta-analysis, the addition of chemotherapy did not improve survival for patients >70years. We hypothesized that elderly patients treated with CRT would have increased toxicity without similar improvements in survival.

METHODS

A single-institution, IRB-approved retrospective study took place from 2005 to 2012 including 369 patients treated with CRT for LAHNC. Multivariate models for death at 3months and death over time were developed using logistic regression and Cox modeling, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients ≥70years were treated less often with concurrent cisplatin dosed every 3weeks (25.5% vs. 71.4%, respectively) and more often with weekly carboplatin (31.9% vs. 3.4%) than patients <70years (n=322; p<0.001). Patients ≥70years experienced increased toxicity during treatment with more frequently hospitalizations (36.2% vs. 21.1%; p=0.02) and a lower rate of PEG removal at last follow-up or death (77.1% vs. 92.9%; p=0.004). A higher proportion of patients ≥70years died within 3months (12.8% vs. 2.8%; p=0.001) following CRT. Patients ≥70 had an increased risk of death at 3months following CRT (odds ratio 5.19, 95% CI 1.64-16.41; p=0.005) and worse survival over time (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% CI 1.34-3.93; p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≥70years were more often treated with less toxic chemotherapy, yet experienced higher rates of hospitalization during treatment and increased rates of acute mortality following CRT. The efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients should be evaluated in a prospective setting.

Postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Despite resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region (SCCHN) often recur. Because adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation reduces recurrence among high-risk mucosal SCCHN, we sought to understand its efficacy among high-risk cutaneous SCCHN.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with cutaneous SCCHN who underwent adjuvant radiation or concurrent chemoradiation. Patients must have had stage III/IV with high-risk features, including metastatic involvement of ≥2 lymph nodes, positive margins, or extracapsular invasion.

RESULTS

There were 61 patients: 27 (44%) received adjuvant radiation and 34 (56%) received adjuvant chemoradiation. The median recurrence-free survivals were 15.4 and 40.3 months, respectively. Adjuvant chemoradiation significantly decreased the risk of recurrence or death in a multivariable analysis: hazard ratio (HR) 0.31 (p = .01). However, a difference in overall survival was not found.

CONCLUSION

For high-risk cutaneous SCCHN, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with a better recurrence-free survival than adjuvant radiation alone.

A phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of panobinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, combined with erlotinib in patients with advanced aerodigestive tract tumors

PURPOSE

Panobinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, enhances antiproliferative activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines when combined with erlotinib. We evaluated this combination in patients with advanced NSCLC and head and neck cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly panobinostat plus daily erlotinib at four planned dose levels (DL). Pharmacokinetics, blood, fat pad biopsies (FPB) for histone acetylation, and paired pre and posttherapy tumor biopsies for checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) expression were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 42 enrolled patients, 33 were evaluable for efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicities were prolonged-QTc and nausea at DL3. Adverse events included fatigue and nausea (grades 1-3), and rash and anorexia (grades 1-2). Disease control rates were 54% for NSCLC (n = 26) and 43% for head and neck cancer (n = 7). Of 7 patients with NSCLC with EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations, 3 had partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 progressed. For EGFR-mutant versus EGFR wild-type patients, progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 versus 1.9 months (P = 0.43) and overall survival was 41 (estimated) versus 5.2 months (P = 0.39). Erlotinib pharmacokinetics was not significantly affected. Correlative studies confirmed panobinostat's pharmacodynamic effect in blood, FPB, and tumor samples. Low CHK1 expression levels correlated with PFS (P = 0.006) and response (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined MTD at 30 mg (panobinostat) and 100 mg (erlotinib). Further studies are needed to further explore the benefits of HDAC inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, investigate FPB as a potential surrogate source for biomarker investigations, and validate CHK1's predictive role.

Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Previous analysis of this Intergroup trial demonstrated that with a median follow-up among surviving patients of 45.9 months, the concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiation therapy improved local-regional control and disease-free survival of patients who had high-risk resectable head-and-neck carcinomas. With a minimum of 10 years of follow-up potentially now available for all patients, these results are updated here to examine long-term outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 410 analyzable patients who had high-risk resected head-and-neck cancers were prospectively randomized to receive either radiation therapy (RT: 60 Gy in 6 weeks) or identical RT plus cisplatin, 100 mg/m(2)i.v. on days 1, 22, and 43 (RT + CT).

RESULTS

At 10 years, the local-regional failure rates were 28.8% vs 22.3% (P=.10), disease-free survival was 19.1% vs 20.1% (P=.25), and overall survival was 27.0% vs 29.1% (P=.31) for patients treated by RT vs RT + CT, respectively. In the unplanned subset analysis limited to patients who had microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease, local-regional failure occurred in 33.1% vs 21.0% (P=.02), disease-free survival was 12.3% vs 18.4% (P=.05), and overall survival was 19.6% vs 27.1% (P=.07), respectively.

CONCLUSION

At a median follow-up of 9.4 years for surviving patients, no significant differences in outcome were observed in the analysis of all randomized eligible patients. However, analysis of the subgroup of patients who had either microscopically involved resection margins and/or extracapsular spread of disease showed improved local-regional control and disease-free survival with concurrent administration of chemotherapy. The remaining subgroup of patients who were enrolled only because they had tumor in 2 or more lymph nodes did not benefit from the addition of CT to RT.

Effect of prophylactic fluconazole on oral mucositis and candidiasis during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for carcinoma of the head and neck can result in high rates of candidiasis and mucositis. Prophylactic fluconazole (FCZ) has been shown to reduce the incidence of candidiasis. We report our outcomes of patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing CRT treated prophylactically with FCZ.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An institutional review board-approved database of head-and-neck cancer patients treated with RT or CRT was reviewed to identify patients treated between 2004 and 2009 who received at least 50 Gy to approximately two-thirds of the oral cavity or oropharynx mucosa. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: the usual care group and the prophylaxis group. The primary endpoints were the incidence of mucositis and candidiasis.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were eligible for analysis: 72 patients in the prophylactic group and 109 patients in the usual care group. Patient characteristics and radiation dose were comparable between groups. RT alone was given in 28 patients (16%). Mucositis data were available in 161 (89%) patients. Grade 2 or higher mucositis was seen in 131 (81%) patients. Prophylactic FCZ had significantly decreased grade 2 or higher mucositis. In the usual care group and prophylaxis group patients, 83 of 93 patients (89.3%) and 48 of 68 patients (70.6%), respectively, developed grade 2 or higher mucositis (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of FCZ twice weekly during CRT for head-and-neck cancer reduces incidence of mucositis and thrush.

A phase II study of cisplatin preceded by a 12-h continuous infusion of concurrent hydroxyurea and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) for adult patients with malignant gliomas (Southwest Oncology Group S9149)

Inhibition of DNA excision repair can modulate resistance to cisplatin. Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and hydroxyurea (HU), in combination, inhibit the excision-repair system and removal of platinum-DNA adducts. Marked cytotoxic synergy had been demonstrated in vitro at clinically achievable levels. The three-drug regimen was found to be feasible in clinical pilot studies. A Phase II study in patients with relapsed or progressive anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) was performed in the Southwest Oncology Group. The primary end point was 6 month survival, historically about 42%. A loading dose of HU 1,260 mg/m2 IV over 1 h was followed by Ara-C 1,200 mg/m2 plus HU 5,040 mg/m2 IV over 12 h, followed by cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV over 1 h. A total of 76 patients were registered. The GBM stratum registered 56 patients in a two-stage accrual. Among 51 eligible GBM patients, the 6-month survival probability was 41% (95% CI 28-55%), and median overall survival was 5 months (95% CI 4-6 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 25% (95% CI 14-37%), and median progression-free survival was 2 months (95% CI 2-4 months). One patient achieved a partial response (2%, 95% CI 0-10%), 13 patients had stable disease (25%, 95% CI 14-39%). Twenty-two patients progressed, and 14 were not assessable for response. The AA stratum was closed early after 20 patients due to slow accrual. Among 19 eligible patients, the 6-month survival probability was 58% (95% CI 36-80%), and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI 7-14 months). The 6-month progression-free survival probability was 26% (95% CI 6-46%), and median progression-free survival was 3 months (95% CI 2-5 months). No responses were seen. Six patients (32%) had stable disease (95% CI 13-57%), 11 progressed, and 2 were not assessable for response. Of the 70 patients evaluable for toxicity, two died of infection. Twenty-three patients (33%) experienced Grade 4 toxicities, primarily hematological. Cisplatin combined with HU and Ara-C did not improve the 6 month survival rate in patients with relapsed or progressive AA or GBM. Significantly more hematological toxicity was seen than expected from cisplatin alone. Although benefit might be possible in a more platinum-sensitive tumor type, further clinical trials with this regimen for patients with glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma are not justified.

Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of resection and postoperative radiotherapy, high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently recurs in the original tumor bed. We tested the hypothesis that concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiotherapy would improve the rate of local and regional control.

METHODS

Between September 9, 1995, and April 28, 2000, 459 patients were enrolled. After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions over a period of 6 to 6.6 weeks) and 228 patients to receive the identical treatment plus concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the rate of local and regional control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for local or regional recurrence, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.91; P=0.01). The estimated two-year rate of local and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in the radiotherapy group. Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease or death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04), but overall survival was not (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.09; P=0.19). The incidence of acute adverse effects of grade 3 or greater was 34 percent in the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P<0.001). Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among high-risk patients with resected head and neck cancer, concurrent postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve the rates of local and regional control and disease-free survival. However, the combined treatment is associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects.

An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

The treatment challenge of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Both the demographics and treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) are changing. Patients are younger and healthier, with fewer comorbidities. The "no treatment until symptoms" approach is disappearing. Chemotherapy is increasingly being utilized.

METHODS

The authors review the steps involved in hormone management before chemotherapy is considered. The roles for chemotherapy in current clinical trials are examined.

RESULTS

Effective hormonal management of the prostate cancer patient incorporates an understanding of the stages of hormone sensitivity and prescribing additional interventions beyond simple castration. Once hormone refractoriness is established, the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone has become a standard chemotherapeutic approach. New agents such as docetaxel are being tested in phase III trials against mitoxantrone plus prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS

HRPC is now regarded as a chemotherapy-sensitive tumor. The goals of chemotherapy in HRPC are to decrease PSA level and improve quality of life. New agents and combinations are needed to improve survival.

Neoadjuvant androgen ablation in localized carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

An increased awareness of prostate cancer has led to a rise in the detection of this disease at a clinically localized stage at presentation. This article discusses the role of neoadjuvant hormonal ablation at this earlier stage to decrease tumor bulk and thus enhance survival.

METHODS

Outcomes from each primary modality for localized treatment of prostate cancer with and without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) are reviewed.

RESULTS

Survival benefit using NAAD has not yet been demonstrated from prostatectomy. Long-term hormonal deprivation provides an improved time to progression and has decreased distant metastatic and biochemical failure for poor-risk patients undergoing external-beam radiation. The toxicities of brachytherapy can be decreased with NAAD.

CONCLUSIONS

NAAD with radical prostatectomy is considered to be investigational. The duration of NAAD needs to be delineated for poor-prognosis patients who are treated with external-beam radiation therapy, but the approach improves the local toxicity of brachytherapy.

Feasibility trial of postoperative radiotherapy and cisplatin followed by three courses of 5-FU and cisplatin in patients with resected head and neck cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy for resected head and neck cancer patients has yet to be defined. Multiple trials have noted trends toward improved disease-free survival and local control. The Southwest Oncology Group undertook a feasibility trial of postoperative cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by three cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

METHODS

Patients with resected stage III or IV head and neck cancer received cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy. This therapy was followed by three cycles of cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 or last tolerated dose, and 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1 to 4 every 21 days.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients from 22 institutions were registered; 68 were evaluable. Sixty-eight patients received radiotherapy. Only 25 of 68 patients (36.7%) were able to complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Forty-three of 68 patients (63%) completed all three cycles with radiotherapy. Toxicities were tolerable. One toxic death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not feasible to deliver six cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively in the sequence described. Compliance issues need further exploration to define effective adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck patients.

Continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for advanced/recurrent transitional cell cancer of the bladder: a Southwest Oncology Group trial

Significant toxicities result from the use of MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, cisplatin) for advanced/ recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (ARTCCB). An alternative regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin was evaluated by Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Thirty-eight patients with ARTCCB were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/days 1-5 and cisplatin 100 mg/day 1, on a every-21-days schedule. There were two complete responses (CR) and eight partial responses (PR) among 36 eligible patients, for an overall response rate of 28% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-45%]. Median duration of response was 6 months, and median duration of survival was 9 months. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients. Other toxicities were mild. Only two documented infections occurred in 5 patients with neutropenia. The response rate of 28% is better than that achieved with cisplatin alone and not dissimilar to the range of response for MVAC. Toxicities were less and tolerable. This regimen will need further evaluation.

Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron 8 mg twice daily for 3 days with placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in 81 patients receiving cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic if the investigator deemed it necessary or if the patient experienced more than two emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Sixty-one percent of patients treated with ondansetron compared with 6% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001) had no emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was 24 hours 18 minutes in the ondansetron group compared with 8 hours 1 minute in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the ondansetron group and 29% of patients in the placebo group completed the study with no need for rescue therapy. Clinical laboratory and adverse-event profiles were similar between groups. The most common adverse event was headache, occurring in 23% of ondansetron patients and 24% of placebo patients. This study is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to demonstrate that ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The twice-daily regimen may encourage patient compliance and may be more cost-effective than regimens that need to be given three times daily.