Five-year outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus 4 cycles of chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the randomized CheckMate 9LA trial

BACKGROUND

We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from CheckMate 9LA in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and exploratory analyses in key patient subgroups.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (n = 361) or chemotherapy (n = 358). Outcomes were assessed in all randomized patients and subgroups.

RESULTS

With 57.3 months' minimum follow-up, patients continued to derive overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.85; 5-year OS rates, 18% vs. 11%), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 < 1%, 22% vs. 8%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 18% vs. 11%), histology (squamous, 18% vs. 7%; non-squamous, 19% vs. 12%), or presence of baseline brain metastases (20% vs. 6%). Five-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 19% versus 8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, with consistent benefit across subgroups. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events had a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Five-year progression-free survival and DOR rates in 5-year survivors were 55% versus 38% and 59% versus 46%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in 5-year survivors, regardless of the number of ipilimumab doses received.

CONCLUSION

This 5-year update supports the long-term, durable OS benefit and improved 5-year survivorship with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT03215706.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC and Tumor Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Lower Than 1%: A Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based treatment regimens have shown long-term, durable efficacy benefits in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Here we report clinical outcomes from a pooled analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) lower than 1% treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without two cycles of chemotherapy versus up to four cycles of chemotherapy in the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 9LA studies.

METHODS

Patients were aged 18 years or older and had stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

In patients with tumor PD-L1 lower than 1% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (n = 322) versus chemotherapy (n = 315) arms, median OS was 17.4 versus 11.3 months, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.76; 5-y OS rate, 20% versus 7%) at a median follow-up of 73.7 months. The OS benefit was observed across key subgroups, including difficult-to-treat populations such as those with baseline brain metastases (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.75) or squamous NSCLC (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72). In the overall pooled population, the median PFS was 5.4 versus 4.9 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87; 5-y PFS rate, 9% versus 2%), the objective response rate was 29% versus 22%, and the median duration of response was 18.0 versus 4.6 months. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy provides a long-term, durable clinical benefit in patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor PD-L1 lower than 1%, supporting the use of this strategy as a first-line treatment option in this population with high unmet need.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

NCT02477826, NCT03215706.

Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III EVOKE-01 Study

PURPOSE

The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen, and AGA treatment received or not) to SG (one 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel (one 75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population (SG, n = 299; docetaxel, n = 304), 55.4% had one previous line of therapy. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 6.0-24.0). The primary end point was not met. There was a numerical OS improvement for SG versus docetaxel (median, 11.1 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.04]; one-sided P = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death.

CONCLUSION

Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.

First-line Avelumab plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from the Phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley Study

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy can potentially enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by promoting immune priming. The phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley trial (NCT03317496) evaluated first-line avelumab + concurrent chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg was administered continuously every 3 weeks with standard doses of cisplatin + gemcitabine in patients with urothelial carcinoma, or carboplatin + pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Dual primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; phase Ib) and confirmed objective response (phase Ib/II).

RESULTS

In phase Ib, urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC cohorts received avelumab 800 mg (n = 13 and n = 6, respectively) or 1,200 mg (n = 6 each) + chemotherapy. In evaluable patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, DLT occurred in 1/12 (8.3%) and 1/6 (16.7%), respectively; no DLT occurred in the NSCLC cohort. In phase II, 35 additional patients with urothelial carcinoma received avelumab 1,200 mg + chemotherapy. Across all treated patients, safety profiles were similar irrespective of avelumab dose. Objective response rates (95% confidence internal) with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, respectively, across phase Ib/II, were 53.8% (25.1-80.8) and 39.0% (24.2-55.5) in urothelial carcinoma, and 50.0% (11.8-88.2) and 33.3% (4.3-77.7) in NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary efficacy and safety findings with avelumab + chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC were consistent with previous studies of similar combination regimens. Conclusions about clinical activity are limited by small patient numbers.

SIGNIFICANCE

This phase Ib/II trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) administered concurrently with standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable mutations. Efficacy and safety appeared consistent with previous studies of similar combinations, although patient numbers were small.

Tepotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with high-level MET amplification detected by liquid biopsy: VISION Cohort B

High-level MET amplification (METamp) is a primary driver in ∼1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Cohort B of the phase 2 VISION trial evaluates tepotinib, an oral MET inhibitor, in patients with advanced NSCLC with high-level METamp who were enrolled by liquid biopsy. While the study was halted before the enrollment of the planned 60 patients, the results of 24 enrolled patients are presented here. The objective response rate (ORR) is 41.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1-63.4), and the median duration of response is 14.3 months (95% CI, 2.8-not estimable). In exploratory biomarker analyses, focal METamp, RB1 wild-type, MYC diploidy, low circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) burden at baseline, and early molecular response are associated with better outcomes. Adverse events include edema (composite term; any grade: 58.3%; grade 3: 12.5%) and constipation (any grade: 41.7%; grade 3: 4.2%). Tepotinib provides antitumor activity in high-level METamp NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02864992).

Systemic and intracranial outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and baseline brain metastases from CheckMate 227 Part 1

INTRODUCTION

In CheckMate 227 Part 1, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Here, we report post hoc exploratory systemic/intracranial efficacy outcomes and safety by baseline brain metastasis status at 5 years' minimum follow-up.

METHODS

Treatment-naive adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations, including asymptomatic patients with treated brain metastases, were enrolled. Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy; patients with tumor PD-L1 <1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Assessments included OS, systemic/intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review, new brain lesion development, and safety. Brain imaging was performed at baseline (all randomized patients) and approximately every 12 weeks thereafter (patients with baseline brain metastases only).

RESULTS

Overall, 202/1739 randomized patients had baseline brain metastases (nivolumab plus ipilimumab: 68; chemotherapy: 66). At 61.3 months' minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in patients with baseline brain metastases (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.92) and in those without (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.87). In patients with baseline brain metastases, 5-year systemic and intracranial PFS rates were higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (12% and 16%, respectively) than chemotherapy (0% and 6%). Fewer patients with baseline brain metastases developed new brain lesions with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (4%) versus chemotherapy (20%). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

With all patients off immunotherapy for ≥3 years, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to provide long-term, durable survival benefit in patients with or without brain metastases. Intracranial efficacy outcomes favored nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. These results further support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an efficacious first-line treatment for patients with mNSCLC, regardless of baseline brain metastasis status.

Five-Year Survival Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in CheckMate 227

PURPOSE

We present 5-year results from CheckMate 227 Part 1, in which nivolumab plus ipilimumab improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK alterations and with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% or < 1% (n = 1739) were randomly assigned. Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% were randomly assigned to first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy. Patients with tumor PD-L1 < 1% were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. End points included exploratory 5-year results for efficacy, safety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year OS rates were 24% versus 14% for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 19% versus 7% (PD-L1 < 1%). The median duration of response was 24.5 versus 6.7 months (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 19.4 versus 4.8 months (PD-L1 < 1%). Among patients surviving 5 years, 66% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 64% (PD-L1 < 1%) were off nivolumab plus ipilimumab without initiating subsequent systemic anticancer treatment by the 5-year time point. Survival benefit continued after nivolumab plus ipilimumab discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events, with a 5-year OS rate of 39% (combined PD-L1 ≥ 1% and < 1% populations). Quality of life in 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was similar to that in the general US population through the 5-year follow-up. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

With all patients off immunotherapy treatment for ≥ 3 years, nivolumab plus ipilimumab increased 5-year survivorship versus chemotherapy, including long-term, durable clinical benefit regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. These data support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an effective first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Long-term survival with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolongs survival versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We further characterized clinical benefit with this regimen in a large pooled patient population and assessed the effect of response on survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from four studies of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 227 Part 1, 817 cohort A, 568 Part 1, and 012). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were assessed. Landmark analyses of OS by response status at 6 months and by tumor burden reduction in responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab were also assessed.

RESULTS

In the pooled population (N = 1332) with a minimum follow-up of 29.1-58.9 months, median OS was 18.6 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 35%; median PFS was 5.4 months (3-year PFS rate, 17%). Objective response rate was 36%; median duration of response was 23.7 months, with 38% of responders having an ongoing response at 3 years. In patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, ≥1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%, 3-year OS rates were 30%, 38%, 30%, and 48%. Three-year OS rates were 30% and 38% in patients with squamous or non-squamous histology. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to the overall pooled population (median OS, 20.1 months; 3-year OS rate, 34%). In the pooled population, responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab at 6 months had longer post-landmark OS than those with stable or progressive disease; 3-year OS rates were 66%, 22%, and 14%, respectively. Greater depth of response was associated with prolonged survival; in patients with tumor burden reduction ≥80%, 50% to <80%, or 30% to <50%, 3-year OS rates were 85%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in the pooled population.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival benefit and durable response with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in this large patient population further support this first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

Safety of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC: A Pooled Analysis of CheckMate 227, CheckMate 568, and CheckMate 817

INTRODUCTION

We characterized the safety of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in a large patient population with metastatic NSCLC and efficacy outcomes after NIVO+IPI discontinuation owing to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

METHODS

We pooled data from three first-line NIVO+IPI studies (NIVO, 3 mg/kg or 240 mg every 2 wk; IPI, 1 mg/kg every 6 wk) in metastatic NSCLC (CheckMate 227 part 1, CheckMate 817 cohort A, CheckMate 568 part 1). Safety end points included TRAEs and immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) in the pooled population and patients aged 75 years or older.

RESULTS

In the pooled population (N = 1255), any-grade TRAEs occurred in 78% of the patients, grade 3 or 4 TRAEs in 34%, and discontinuation of any regimen component owing to TRAEs in 21%. The most frequent TRAE and IMAE were diarrhea (20%; grade 3 or 4, 2%) and rash (17%; grade 3 or 4, 3%), respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 IMAEs were hepatitis (5%) and diarrhea/colitis and pneumonitis (4% each). Pneumonitis was the most common cause of treatment-related death (5 of 16). Safety in patients aged 75 years or older (n = 174) was generally similar to the overall population, but discontinuation of any regimen component owing to TRAEs was more common (29%). In patients discontinuing NIVO+IPI owing to TRAEs (n = 225), 3-year overall survival was 50% (95% confidence interval: 42.6-56.0), and 42% (31.2-52.4) of 130 responders remained in response 2 years after discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line NIVO+IPI was well tolerated in this large population with metastatic NSCLC and in patients aged 75 years or older. Discontinuation owing to TRAEs did not reduce long-term survival.

Assessment of Spanish hospitals involved in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative program

305

Background: Measuring and tracking quality of care is highly relevant in today’s healthcare. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) program is a referral for evaluating oncology practices worldwide. The ECO Foundation (Excellence and Quality in Oncology), a collaboration of oncology experts from the major Spanish hospitals involved in cancer treatment, reached an agreement with ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) to include Spanish hospitals in its QOPI program. Methods: We analyzed the scores of the QOPI rounds from 14 Spanish hospitals, which submitted their charts from 2016 to 2021, and the measures obtained from 2018 to 2021, regarding the core/symptom, breast, colorectal (CRC) and NSCLC modules, in comparison with the QOPI aggregate measures. Results: Since 2016, 14 Spanish hospitals have participated in the QOPI program, achieving the certification 12 of them, and 3 are in process. Along the years, they have obtained a score over 85%, being 87,41% the worse in 2021, and 92,80% the best in 2020. We also analyzed the outstanding measures from 2018 onwards. The highest scores in Spanish hospitals were for information of infertility risks and chemotherapy intent prior to prescription, and documented plan for oral chemotherapy. However, measures regarding pain addressed, appropriate antiemetic therapy for high- and moderate-emetic-risk antineoplastic agents and action taken to address problems with emotional well-being by the second office visit, were among the lowest scored measures. When we focused in breast and NSCLC modules, Spanish hospitals didn´t show negative values, highlighting in the administration of Tamoxifen or AI within 1 year of diagnosis by patients with AJCC Stage IA (T1c) and IB - III ER or PR positive and in the status documentation for patients with initial AJCC Stage IV or distant metastatic NSCLC. In CRC module, Spanish hospitals showed lower scores in colonoscopy before or within 6 months of curative colorectal resection or completion of primary adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study evaluates QOPI scores in Spain, showing that repeated participation enhances quality of care, although there is room for improvement. ECO Foundation will continue supporting Spanish practices to increase their participation aiming of improve oncology care in Spain.

Five-year survival outcomes with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from CheckMate 227

LBA9025

Background: In CheckMate 227 part 1 (NCT02477826), 1L NIVO + IPI demonstrated long-term, durable survival benefit vs platinum-doublet chemo in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level. Here we present the longest reported follow-up (5 y) of a phase 3 trial of 1L combination immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and an ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled and stratified by histology. Pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. Pts were treated until progression, toxicity, or ≤ 2 y for immunotherapy. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and a novel efficacy endpoint, treatment-free interval. Treatment-free interval was measured in pts who discontinued study therapy (for any reason including treatment completion) and was defined as the time from last study dose to start of subsequent systemic therapy or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Minimum follow-up was 61.3 mo (database lock, Feb 15, 2022). In pts with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% (N = 1189), continued long-term OS benefit was seen with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66–0.91]); 5-y OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 17% (NIVO), and 14% (chemo). OS benefit also continued in pts with tumor PD-L1 < 1% (N = 550) for NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52–0.81]); 5-y OS rates were 19% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO + chemo), and 7% (chemo). Clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed across additional efficacy endpoints in the overall population and in pts alive at 5 y (table). PFS, ORR, and DOR with NIVO and NIVO + chemo will be presented. Among pts alive at 5 y in the NIVO + IPI group, 66% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 64% (PD-L1 < 1%) remained treatment-free ≥ 3 y after discontinuing study therapy; median (range) duration of NIVO ± IPI therapy was 17.7 (0-25.5) mo (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 9.5 (0-25.1) mo (PD-L1 < 1%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: With a 5-y minimum follow-up, NIVO + IPI continues to provide long-term, durable clinical benefit vs chemo in previously untreated pts with metastatic NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression. NIVO + IPI led to increased 5-y survivorship; the majority of these pts were treatment-free for ≥ 3 y post-treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) + 2 cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients (pts) with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 3-year update from CheckMate 9LA

LBA9026

Background: In CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706), 1L NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo was shown to provide survival benefit vs chemo alone in pts with metastatic NSCLC. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety with a 3-year minimum follow-up, as well as exploratory biomarker analyses from this study. Methods: Adults with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known sensitizing EGFR/ ALK alterations, and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + 2 cycles of chemo (n = 361) or 4 cycles of chemo alone (n = 358). Pts were stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression, sex, and histology. Pts with non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). For all pts with NSQ NSCLC and with tissue evaluable for mutational analysis (n = 313), the FoundationOne CDxTM assay was used to identify mutant (mut) or wild type (wt) KRAS and STK11 genes. Exploratory assessments included evaluation of OS and PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo by mutation status and safety. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 36.1 mo (database lock: Feb 15, 2022), pts continued to derive long-term, durable OS benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62–0.87]); 3-y OS rates were 27% vs 19%. Clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across most subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. In an exploratory analysis in pts evaluable for mutations including KRAS and STK11, OS appeared to be improved with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo (median OS, 16.3 vs 13.1 mo). Similar trends of prolonged OS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo were also seen in pts with or without KRAS mutation (median OS, mut: 19.2 vs 13.5 mo; wt: 15.6 vs 12.7 mo) or STK11 mutation (mut: 13.8 vs 10.7 mo; wt: 17.8 vs 13.9 mo), respectively. Additional efficacy outcomes will be presented. No new safety signals were identified with extended follow-up. Conclusions: With a 3-year minimum follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated long-term, durable efficacy benefit vs chemo in pts with metastatic NSCLC. Survival benefit of NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed regardless of KRAS and STK11 mutation status. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

KeyVibe-008: Randomized, phase 3 study of first-line vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab plus etoposide/platinum versus atezolizumab plus EP in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

TPS8606

Background: Current standard of care immunotherapy plus chemotherapy options for first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are associated with modest improvements in median OS and PFS. In the KEYNOTE-604 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus etoposide/platinum (EP) significantly improved PFS (HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61‒0.91; P = 0.0023) compared with placebo plus EP in ES-SCLC; OS was also longer with pembrolizumab plus EP vs placebo plus EP but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64‒0.98; P = 0.0164). Preclinical and clinical data suggest that blocking the interaction between the T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) and its ligands CD112 and CD155 with the anti-TIGIT humanized monoclonal antibody vibostolimab (MK-7684) yields promising antitumor activity when combined with pembrolizumab, with or without chemotherapy, including in patients with lung cancer. The current phase 3 study, KeyVibe-008 (NCT05224141), is comparing the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with MK-7684A, a co-formulation of vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab, in combination with EP vs atezolizumab plus EP in patients with ES-SCLC. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study is enrolling patients aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed, previously untreated ES-SCLC. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; ECOG PS of 0 or 1; no active CNS metastases/carcinomatous meningitis, autoimmune disease, neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes, pneumonitis, or interstitial lung disease; and must provide a pretreatment tumor sample. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive up to 4 cycles of EP (cisplatin or carboplatin) in combination with MK-7684A (vibostolimab 200 mg + pembrolizumab 200 mg) Q3W or atezolizumab (1200 mg) Q3W, followed by MK-7684A or atezolizumab, respectively, until disease progression, unacceptable AEs, intercurrent illness, protocol violation, or investigator/patient decision. Randomization is stratified by ECOG PS (0 vs 1), LDH (≤ULN vs > ULN), liver metastases (yes vs no), and brain metastases (yes vs no). The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include PFS, ORR, and duration of response per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review; safety; and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Tumor imaging occurs at baseline, every 6 weeks until 48 weeks, and every 9 weeks thereafter until disease progression, start of new anticancer treatment, withdrawal of consent, or death. PROs are assessed using validated instruments including the EORTC quality of life and EuroQol questionnaires. AEs are graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0. Enrollment is ongoing worldwide. Clinical trial information: NCT05224141.

PD-L1, VISTA, and CD47 expression and prognosis impact in malignant pleural mesothelioma

8562

Background: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) has been characterized by an immune suppressive microenvironment. The immune checkpoint (IC) VISTA is notably expressed in MPM, in contrast to other IC proteins such us PD-L1. Recently, CD47 has been described as a possible diagnostic biomarker for MPM, although its impact in prognosis has not been established yet. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of immunotherapy naïve MPM patients. Immunochemistry (IHC) assessment of PD-L1, VISTA and CD47 protein expression was performed on tissue microarray of 46 surgical samples. Means were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation was estimated using Pearson’s coefficients. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. A two-sided alpha error of 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance. Statistical analysis was conducted with Stata/SE version 16.1. Results: A total of 46 patients, 71.7% (33/46) male, were included in our study. Among them, 77.8% (35/45) had stage IIIB-IV, 84.8% (39/46) had received systemic therapy and 16.7% (7/42) had undergone radical-intent surgery. Asbestos exposure was confirmed in 65,7% (23/35) patients. Regarding the histological subtype, 71.7% (33/46) were epithelioid (Ep) and 13.0% (6/46) non-epithelioid (NEp), including 5 sarcomatoid and 1 biphasic. In IHC analysis, VISTA and CD47 were expressed in 63.0% (29/46) and 58.7% (27/46), respectively, whereas only 28.3% (13/46) patients had positive PD-L1 expression (≥1%). Median expression of VISTA, CD47 and PD-L1 in tumor samples was 41.8 (95% IC 0.5 - 50.7), 26.3 (95% IC 0 - 45.8) and 0 (95% IC 0-0.5), respectively. VISTA and CD47 expression were significantly higher in the Ep subgroup vs. the NEp subgroup (VISTA 39.4% vs 7.2% p = 0.028; CD47 37.3 vs. 0.8 p = 0.01). Additionally, we found a significant positive correlation between VISTA and CD47 protein expression (Pearson's r = 0.55, p < 0.001), which was consistent with the results we found in an independent MPM patient series from TCGA PanCancer Atlas (N = 87) based on RNA expression (r = 0.46; p < 0.001). Median OS, available in 40/46 cases, was 16.6 months (95% CI 12.03-20.43). On multivariate analysis, CD47 ≥1% expression was significantly associated with longer OS (29.7 vs 10.53 months, HR 0.35, [IC 95% 0.14-0.86]; p = 0.02) after adjusting for histological subtype, PDL1 and VISTA expression. In contrast, PD-L1 ≥1% showed a trend towards worse prognosis (10.3 vs 19.3 months), without reaching statistical significance (HR 2.23 [95% IC 0.95-5.23]; p = 0.065). No OS differences were found regarding VISTA expression. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe VISTA and CD47 correlation in MPM. Moreover, we demonstrate CD47 expression to be an independent prognostic marker in MPM, suggesting C47 may play a key role in tumor biology of MPM, for which further validation and functional studies are necessary.

Final survival outcomes and immune biomarker analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase I/II study combining oncolytic adenovirus ONCOS-102 with pemetrexed/cisplatin (P/C) in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

8561

Background: MPM is an aggressive malignancy without curative treatment. ONCOS-102 is an oncolytic adenovirus expressing GM-CSF (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF) with a clinically documented ability to stimulate local and systemic immune responses and re-modulate the tumor microenvironment, both as a monotherapy and in combination with anti-PD1 blockade. The study objectives included determining safety and tolerability, efficacy and immunological activation in repeat tumor biopsies, and correlations with clinical outcomes. Methods: Following a safety run-in of n = 6 pts, 25 patients were randomized to receive ONCOS-102 intratumorally under CT or US guidance at a dose of 3 x 1011 Virus Particles on Day 1, 4, 8, 36, 78 and 120, plus six cycles of P/C starting on Day 22, or control comprising six cycles of P/C only. Both treatment-naïve (1L) and previously treated patients (2L) were enrolled. Imaging was done at baseline, Day 43-64 and 127-148 and tumor biopsy were collected at baseline and at Day 36. Final survival analysis (n = 25) was performed after 30 mo follow up. Multiplex immunofluorescence for immune cell subsets, RNASeq and qPCR was performed on repeat tumor samples. Results: The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia and asthenia reported by > 50% in both groups with more frequent reports of pyrexia and nausea in the experimental (exp) group. No difference in the rate of severe events (Gr 3/4 acc to NCI CTCAE vs 4.0) were observed. 30-month survival rate (n = 25) was 34.3 % vs 18.2 % (NS) with mOS of 19.3 mo (95% CI: 4.6, NA) vs 18.3 mo (95% CI: 3.1, 28.9) in the exp group vs control. For patients treated in the 1L setting, 30 mo survival was 33.3 % in the exp group (n = 8) and 0% in the control group (n = 6) with mOS of 25.0 months and 13.5 months, respectively (NS). mPFS was unchanged from prior cut-offs; 9.8 months in the exp group and 7.6 in the control (NS). ONCOS-102 + P/C induced a pronounced increase in tumor infiltration by CD4+, CD8+ and granzyme B expressing CD8+ T-cells as well as M1:M2 macrophage polarization in patients with disease control (n = 13) vs progressing patients (n = 3). The data from RNAseq and qPCR analysis will be presented. Conclusions: The addition of ONCOS-102 to P/C was well tolerated by MPM patients and resulted in numerically improved 30-month survival rate in the overall population, and improved mOS in chemotherapy-naïve patients, albeit not statistically significant. Substantial immunological activation in tumor associated with ONCOS-102 was demonstrated, correlating with clinical benefit. Further exploration of ONCOS-102 as a treatment option in MPM is warranted Clinical trial information: NCT02879669.

Adverse events self-reported by patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) plus platinum-etoposide (EP) or EP in the CASPIAN study

8571

Background: The CASPIAN phase 3 study established D+EP as a global standard of care in ES-SCLC. Patient-Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to complement standard adverse event (AE) reporting in oncology trials. Here we describe patient-reported symptomatic AEs using PRO-CTCAE in CASPIAN, the first time the PRO-CTCAE tool has been piloted in SCLC research. Methods: In CASPIAN, treatment-naïve pts (WHO PS 0/1) with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of D+EP q3w followed by maintenance D q4w until progressive disease (PD), or up to 6 cycles of EP q3w. As part of exploratory analyses, where validated local language versions were available (in English, German, Japanese or Spanish), pts were asked to complete the PRO-CTCAE by e-device at baseline, q3w during EP (in both arms), then q4w until PD, followed by day 28 post-PD, 2 months post-PD, and q8w until second progression/death. Presence/absence, frequency or severity were examined during the first 24 weeks after starting treatment across 11 AEs selected as being relevant to pts with ES-SCLC (Table). Results: In total, 164 of the 537 pts randomized to D+EP and EP in CASPIAN (31%; D+EP: 83; EP: 81) were asked to complete the PRO-CTCAE. At baseline, the PRO-CTCAE was completed by 84% of these pts in the D+EP arm and 81% in the EP arm; compliance rates > 60% were achieved up to cycle 32 for D+EP and cycle 6 for EP. Examined AEs were reported by a minority of pts before starting treatment in both arms (range D+EP vs EP: 4% vs 3% for hand-foot syndrome to 34% vs 41% for dry mouth). Baseline AE rates were generally maintained in both arms up to 24 weeks after starting treatment, except for itchy skin, which showed a numerical increase from 13% at baseline to a peak of 34% at cycle 6 in the D+EP arm and 12% at baseline to a peak of 42% at cycle 8 in the EP arm; and dizziness, which showed a numerical increase from 16% at baseline to a peak of 40% at cycle 5 in the D+EP arm, while rates were maintained vs baseline in the EP arm. Most pts reporting these AEs indicated that they occurred rarely or occasionally, or were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions: Self-reported data from pts in CASPIAN showed that the 11 AEs examined during the 24 weeks after starting treatment were reported by a minority of pts, mostly with rare or occasional occurrence, and mild to moderate severity. Rates and patterns of AEs over time were broadly similar in the D+EP and EP arms. These results complement the CASPIAN safety profile and give insight into pts’ experience of treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03043872. [Table: see text]

Phase 1/2a trial of nadunolimab, a first-in-class fully humanized monoclonal antibody against IL1RAP, in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine (CG) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9020

Background: Interleukin-1 Receptor Accessory Protein (IL1RAP) is expressed by cancer and stromal cells of many solid tumors. The IL-1 pathway is active in tumors and upregulated in response to chemotherapy. IL1RAP interacts with IL-1R1 and modulates downstream factors (e.g. IL-6, IL-8) and CRP level. Nadunolimab (CAN04), a fully humanized ADCC-enhanced IgG1 antibody, targets IL1RAP and blocks IL-1α and IL-1β signaling. Here, results are reported from the phase 1/2a clinical trial CANFOUR evaluating nadunolimab combined with CG in NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, progressed on pembrolizumab or in first line for advanced disease, were eligible. Pts received 1 (n =17), 2.5 (n = 3) or 5 mg/kg (= 13) nadunolimab given Q1W in Cycle 1 and Q2W from Cycle 2, combined with standard CG. Due to risk of infusion-related reactions, a priming dose of 0.5 mg/kg nadunolimab was given one week before CG. Primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included ORR, PFS and OS, and exploratory objectives included effects on serum and tumor tissue biomarkers. Results: Thirty-three pts were enrolled: median age 64 years (39-77), 30% female, 42% ECOG 0, 55% non-squamous histology, 82% stage IV, 45% received previous pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events of grade≥3 were observed in 73% of pts, including neutropenia (58%), febrile neutropenia (9%), thrombocytopenia (30%) and anemia (18%). Neutropenia could be managed by G-CSF. Thirty pts received combination therapy and were included in the efficacy analysis. Three pts did not receive chemotherapy due to clinical deterioration (n = 2) or consent withdrawal (n = 1). ORR was 53% (95% CI 34-72%), disease control rate 80% (61-92%) and median duration of response 5.5 months (3.7-7.0) with 23% of pts still on treatment. The lower limit of the 95% CI for the observed ORR excludes the pre-specified 30%. ORR in pts with squamous histology was 46% and non-squamous 56%. Median PFS was 6.7 months (5.5-7.3) and median OS 13.7 months. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was reduced throughout the trial and was driven by the reduction in circulating neutrophil numbers. IL1RAP expression on both cancer and stromal cells was confirmed in tumor biopsies. Conclusions: Nadunolimab combined with CG shows manageable safety and promising efficacy with a response rate of 53% in NSCLC pts. Nadunolimab is currently evaluated in several clinical trials investigating chemotherapy or IO combinations, including carboplatin and pemetrexed in non-squamous NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03267316.

Phase 2 study of tarlatamab, a DLL3-targeting, half life–extended, bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE)immuno-oncology therapy, in relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

TPS8603

Background: SCLC is characterized by rapid growth and early development of metastases. Platinum-based first-line chemotherapy is associated with a high initial response rate; however, disease recurrence is common. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is a Notch ligand that is upregulated and aberrantly expressed on the cell surface in most SCLC, making it a compelling therapeutic target. Tarlatamab is an HLE BiTE immuno-oncology therapy designed to bind DLL3 on target cancer cells and CD3 on T cells, forming a cytolytic synapse inducing T cell activation and expansion and T cell-dependent killing of tumor cells. Interim results of an ongoing first-in-human study in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC (NCT03319940) show preliminary evidence for tarlatamab efficacy in pretreated patients with confirmed partial responses in 20% of patients and duration of response of 8.7 months (Owonikoko TK, et al. Abstract 8510. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting, June 4–8, 2021; Virtual). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 27% of patients and TRAEs resulted in discontinuation in 5% of patients. This promising efficacy/safety profile supports further study of tarlatamab in SCLC. Methods: NCT05060016 is a phase 2, open-label study evaluating tarlatamab in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC after two or more lines of prior treatment. Part 1 is a dose characterization phase in which subjects will be randomized 1:1 to two active doses of tarlatamab. Part 2 will continue enrollment for the selected target dose only based on interim analysis of Part 1. Key eligibility criteria include adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC whose disease progressed/recurred after two or more lines of prior treatment including at least 1 platinum-based regimen (including a PD-L1 inhibitor, if standard of care, with certain exceptions per protocol), treated brain metastases, ECOG performance status ≤1, and life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks in the opinion of the investigator. The primary endpoint for the primary analysis is ORR per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary objectives are to evaluate antitumor activity by additional measures (duration of response, progression-free survival, disease control rate and duration, overall survival), safety and tolerability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics. Sites in North America, Asia and Europe are participating in the trial with subjects already enrolled and enrollment ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05060016.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced NSCLC: 4-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CheckMate 227 Part 1 Trial

INTRODUCTION

In CheckMate 227, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) greater than or equal to 1% (primary end point) or less than 1% (prespecified descriptive analysis). We report results with minimum 4 years' follow-up.

METHODS

Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥1%); or to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Efficacy included OS and other measures. Safety included timing and management of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs). A post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy in patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).

RESULTS

After 54.8 months' median follow-up, OS remained longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90) and PD-L1 less than 1% (0.64; 0.51-0.81); 4-year OS rate with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was 29% versus 18% (PD-L1 ≥1%); and 24% versus 10% (PD-L1 <1%). Benefits were observed in both squamous and nonsquamous histologies. In a descriptive analysis, efficacy was improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab relative to nivolumab (PD-L1 ≥1%) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common immune-mediated AE with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab plus chemotherapy was rash; most immune-mediated AEs (except endocrine events) occurred within 6 months from start of treatment and resolved within 3 months after, mainly with systemic corticosteroids. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs had long-term OS benefits, as seen in the all randomized population.

CONCLUSIONS

At more than 4 years' minimum follow-up, with all patients off immunotherapy treatment for at least 2 years, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate durable long-term efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No new safety signals were identified. Immune-mediated AEs occurred early and resolved quickly with guideline-based management. Discontinuation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs did not have a negative impact on the long-term benefits seen in all randomized patients.

Pralsetinib for RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARROW): a multi-cohort, open-label, phase 1/2 study

BACKGROUND

Oncogenic alterations in RET have been identified in multiple tumour types, including 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and antitumour activity of pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, selective RET inhibitor, in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase 1/2 study done at 71 sites (community and academic cancer centres) in 13 countries (Belgium, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Netherlands, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA). Patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours, including RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later limited to 0-1 in a protocol amendment) were enrolled. In phase 2, patients received 400 mg once-daily oral pralsetinib, and could continue treatment until disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Phase 2 primary endpoints were overall response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1·1 and assessed by blinded independent central review) and safety. Tumour response was assessed in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC and centrally adjudicated baseline measurable disease who had received platinum-based chemotherapy or were treatment-naive because they were ineligible for standard therapy. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03037385, and enrolment of patients with treatment-naive RET fusion-positive NSCLC was ongoing at the time of this interim analysis.

FINDINGS

Of 233 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC enrolled between March 17, 2017, and May 22, 2020 (data cutoff), 92 with previous platinum-based chemotherapy and 29 who were treatment-naive received pralsetinib before July 11, 2019 (efficacy enrolment cutoff); 87 previously treated patients and 27 treatment-naive patients had centrally adjudicated baseline measurable disease. Overall responses were recorded in 53 (61%; 95% CI 50-71) of 87 patients with previous platinum-based chemotherapy, including five (6%) patients with a complete response; and 19 (70%; 50-86) of 27 treatment-naive patients, including three (11%) with a complete response. In 233 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (43 patients [18%]), hypertension (26 [11%]), and anaemia (24 [10%]); there were no treatment-related deaths in this population.

INTERPRETATION

Pralsetinib is a new, well-tolerated, promising, once-daily oral treatment option for patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

FUNDING

Blueprint Medicines.

First-in-human study of PM14 in patients with advanced solid tumors

3078

Background: PM14 is a new chemical entity that forms DNA adducts which specifically inhibit RNA synthesis and block active transcription of protein-coding genes. Antitumor activity has been demonstrated in vitro in several cell lines (e.g. lung, kidney, prostate), and in vivo in mice bearing xenografted human-derived tumors (soft tissue sarcoma, small cell lung cancer, ovarian, gastric, breast and renal cancer). Methods: Open-label, dose-escalating, phase I trial of PM14 administered as a 3-hour infusion i.v. every 3 weeks (q3wk) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function and ECOG PS score of 0-1. Two schedules were explored: Schedule A (Day 1 [D1], Day 8 [D8]) and Schedule B (D1). Results: 37 pts were treated (Schedule A/B: 28/9 pts). Baseline characteristics of pts (A/B): median age 56/47 years; male 57%/56%; ECOG PS 0: 57%/56%; median of prior lines (range): 3 (1-8)/4 (1-10). Most common tumor types (A + B): STS (n=7 pts), ovarian (n=6), pancreatic (n=4), prostate cancer (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose was 4.5 mg/m2 for A (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]: D8 omission due to lack of recovery of lab parameters for re-treatment [n=2 pts]) and 5.6 mg/m2 (DLTs: G4 febrile neutropenia [n=1], G4 transaminase increase [n=1]) for B. The recommended dose (RD) was 3.0 mg/m2 on D1,D8 (A), and 4.5 mg/m2 on D1 (B). No DLTs were present at the RDs. Most common toxicities were hematological abnormalities and transaminase increase. Main toxicities at the RDs are shown below. Antitumor activity comprised stable disease ≥4 months in 7 heavily pretreated pts (6 in A; 1 in B) at all dose levels. Linear pharmacokinetics were observed for PM14 at tested doses (0.25-5.6 mg/m²), with geometric mean (CV%) total plasma clearance 5.9 L/h (88%), volume of distribution 128 L (81%) and median (range) terminal half-life 15.9 h (7.5-34.3 h). Less than 1.6% of administered dose was recovered in urine. Conclusions: RDs were determined for two PM14 schedules in pts with advanced solid tumors. At the RDs, PM14 is well tolerated and has a manageable safety profile. An expansion phase in specific tumor types, with an optional Bayesian continual reassessment method for RD fine-tuning, is ongoing with both schedules.[Table: see text]

AdvanTIG-302: Anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb) ociperlimab (OCI) plus tislelizumab (TIS) versus pembrolizumab (PEM) in programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) selected, previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

TPS9128

Background: Monotherapy with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies has improved clinical outcomes for patients (pts) with non-oncogenic driven NSCLC but clinical responses are limited by primary and secondary resistance, and improvements in durability of response are required. T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domain (TIGIT) is a co-inhibitory, immune checkpoint receptor upregulated on T-cells and natural killer cells in multiple solid tumors, which can inhibit anticancer immune responses. OCI (BGB-A1217) is a novel, humanized mAb that binds to TIGIT with high affinity and specificity, which has demonstrated competent binding with C1q and all Fcγ receptors while inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that dual targeting with anti-TIGIT and anti-PD-1 antibodies produces synergistic immune cell activation and enhanced antitumor activity. Methods: AdvanTIG-302 is a Phase 3, multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind study (NCT04746924) investigating OCI in combination with TIS compared with PEM in adult pts (≥ 18 years of age) with PD-L1 selected, previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic NSCLC without oncogenic EGFR or ALK mutation. Approximately 605 pts will be randomized 5:5:1 to receive: OCI 900 mg intravenously (IV) plus TIS 200 mg IV every three weeks (Q3W; Arm A), PEM 200 mg IV plus placebo IV Q3W (Arm B) or TIS 200 mg IV plus placebo IV Q3W (Arm C). Pts will be treated until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors include histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and region (Asian vs non-Asian). Cross-over is not permitted. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed disease, PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, no known EGFR or ALK mutations and no prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Dual primary endpoints are investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1) and overall survival (Arms A and B) in the Intention-to-Treat population. Secondary endpoints include PFS (assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee), investigator-assessed overall response rate and duration of response, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported health-related quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13 and EQ-5D-5L; Arms A and B). Exploratory endpoints include disease control rate, clinical benefit rate and time to response. This study will also evaluate the association between biomarkers and response or resistance. Study enrollment has begun and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04746924.

Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced endometrial carcinoma

5586

Background: LUR is a new agent that exerts antitumor activity through inhibition of trans-activated transcription and modulation of tumor microenvironment. Preclinical synergism/additivity in combination with IRI has been reported, thus prompting the conduct of this trial. This synergism had been evaluated and recently reported in patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer, with encouraging results (Ponce et al. WCLC, 2020). Methods: Phase I trial to evaluate escalating doses of LUR on Day (D) 1 plus a fixed dose of IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 every 3 weeks (q3w) in pts with advanced solid tumors, enrolled following a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Phase II to expand in selected indications at the Recommended Dose (RD). In this abstract, the cohort of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated at the RD is presented. Results: 21 pts (all female) with endometrial carcinoma were treated at the RD (LUR 2 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 + G-CSF); 57% had ECOG PS=1; median age was 64 years (range 34-74); subtype of tumour was split: 67% (14 pts) endometroid, 33% non-endometroid (3 pts serous-papilar, 3 pts clear-cell and 1 pt undifferentiated); median of 2 prior lines (range, 1−7) per pt. Common G1/2 toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea and anorexia; G3/4 hematological toxicities comprised neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (5%) and anemia (38%). Two episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred (9.5%). G3/4 non hematological toxicities consisted of diarrhea (24%), asthenia (19%), nausea (14%) and vomiting (5%), all were transient and manageable. 1 patient (5%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity drug-related (generalized muscular weakness), but no treatment-related deaths were reported. Objective RECIST responses were documented in 4/21 evaluable pts (19%). With 6 pts censored for progression, median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.1-9.6 months), and PFS at 6 months was 40.4%. The clinical benefit rate (% of pts with Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease > 4 months) was 43%, and the Disease Control Rate (% of pts with CR, PR or SD) 81%. 3/21 pts (14%) have been more than 12 months on treatment so far. Conclusions: The combination of Lurbinectedin and Irinotecan is active in heavily pretreated patients with endometrial carcinoma. The combination was well-tolerated and consistent with the known safety profile for this combination. Myelosuppression, diarrhea, nausea and asthenia were predictable and manageable. Updated results of this cohort will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02611024.