Breast density in NF1 women: a retrospective study

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by neurofibromin haploinsufficiency due to pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene. Tumor predisposition has long been associated with NF1, and an increased breast cancer (BC) incidence and reduced survival have been reported in recent years for women with NF1. As breast density is another known independent risk factor for BC, this study aims to evaluate the variability of breast density in patients with NF1 compared to the general population. Mammograms from 98 NF1 women affected by NF1, and enrolled onto our monocentric BC screening program, were compared with those from 300 healthy subjects to verify differences in breast density. Mammograms were independently reviewed and scored by a radiologist and using a Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) software. The comparison of breast density between NF1 patients and controls was performed through Chi-squared test and with multivariable ordinal logistic models adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), number of pregnancies, and menopausal status.breast density was influenced by BMI and menopausal status in both NF1 patients and healthy subjects. No difference in breast density was observed between NF1 patients and the healthy female population, even after considering the potential confounding factors.Although NF1 and a highly fibroglandular breast are known risk factors of BC, in this study, NF1 patients were shown to have comparable breast density to healthy subjects. The presence of pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene does not influence the breast density value.

Bonaventura C, Marras CE, Palestini C, Ferlazzo E, Venturelli E, Dainese F, Martella F, Paladin F, Villani F, Capizzi G, Napoleoni L, Stanzani L, Stragapede L, Zummo L, Balducci M, Eoli M, Rizzi M, Vernaleone M, Messina R, Vittorini R, Gasparini S, Ius T, Cianci V, Manfioli V, Mariani V, Capovilla G. First-line levetiracetam versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication in glioma patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to directly compare the effectiveness of first-line monotherapy levetiracetam (LEV) versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) in glioma patients.

METHODS

In this nationwide retrospective observational cohort study, Grade 2-4 glioma patients were included, with a maximum duration of follow-up of 36 months. Primary outcome was antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment failure for any reason, and secondary outcomes were treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures and due to adverse effects. For estimation of the association between ASM treatment and ASM treatment failure, multivariate cause-specific cox proportional hazard models were estimated, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In the original cohort, a total of 808 brain tumor patients with epilepsy were included, of whom 109 glioma patients were prescribed first-line LEV and 183 glioma patients first-line EIASMs. The EIASM group had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure for any reason compared to LEV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-2.75, p = .005). Treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures did not differ significantly between EIASMs and LEV (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI = .78-2.25, p = .300), but treatment failure due to adverse effects differed significantly (aHR = 4.87, 95% CI = 1.89-12.55, p = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, it was demonstrated that LEV had a significantly better effectiveness (i.e., less ASM treatment failure for any reason or due to adverse effects) compared to EIASMs, supporting the current neuro-oncology guideline recommendations to avoid EIASMs in glioma patients.

OS05.6.A Modification of the tumor microenvironment in patients with glioblastoma using autologous, genetically modified, hematopoietic stem cell-based therapy: the TEM-GBM STUDY (NCT03866109)

Background

Bone marrow-derived macrophages account for substantial GBM tumor volume and contribute to the local inflammatory tumor microenvironment, disease progression and treatment response.

Material and Methods

We have developed a genetically modified, autologous hematopoietic stem cell-based platform designed to deliver Interferon-alpha (IFNa), thanks to a transcriptional and post-transcriptional control mechanism mediated by miRNA target sequences, specifically into the tumor microenvironment via Tie-2 expressing monocytes (Temferon).

Results

As of Feb 2022, 3 escalating doses of Temferon (from 0.5 to 2.0x106/kg) were tested across 15 patients with newly diagnosed, unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma (GBM) assigned to 5 cohorts. The duration of follow-up from surgery is 6 - 28 mo (2 - 25 mo after Temferon). To date, no dose limiting toxicities have been identified. As expected, one month after the administration of the highest tested dose, the hematopoietic system of Temferon-treated patients was composed of up to 30% of CD14+ genetically modified cells, as determined by the presence of vector genomes in the DNA in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells. Temferon-derived progeny persisted, albeit at lower levels, up to 18 months (longest time of analysis). Despite the substantial proportion of engineered cells, very low median concentrations of IFNα were detected in the plasma (D+30, 5.9; D+90, 8.8pg/mL) and in the CSF (D+30, 1.5; D+90, 2.4pg/mL), indicating tight regulation of transgene expression. SAEs were mostly attributed to conditioning chemotherapy (e.g. infections) or disease progression (e.g. seizures). 1 SUSAR (persistent GGT elevation) has occurred. Median OS is 15 mo from surgery (range 6.1-28.4 mo; 10.8 mo post Temferon). Of the 15 pts treated so far, 4 pts belonging to low dose cohorts underwent 2nd surgery. Homing of transduced cells from BM to the tumor site was demonstrated by the presence of gene-marked cells in the specimens collected from 3 of the 4 analyzed pts. Single-cell RNA seq performed on CD45+ cells purified from the TME of Temferon-treated pts compared to recurrent tumors belonging to GBM pts treated as per the current standard of care, highlighted a Temferon signature defined by the induction of markers of IFNa responses and macrophage repolarization. Potential long-term benefit with Temferon was identified in a patient from cohort 3, who had disease progression at D+120 with two distant enhancing lesions, and increased tumor necrosis. One year following Temferon, with no 2nd line therapy added, there was approximately 40% reduction in enhancing tumor volume compared to D+180 with a stable clinical and imaging picture thereafter.

Conclusion

The results provide initial evidence of Temferon’s potential to modulate the TME of GBM patients, and anecdotal evidence for long lasting effects of Temferon in prevention of disease progression.

Prospective observational study on the complications and tolerability of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in neuro-oncological patients

PURPOSE

The use of central venous catheters with peripheral insertion (PICC) has increased rapidly in recent years, particularly in cancer patients. The benefits provided may occasionally be affected by relevant complications, such as infections and thrombotic events, especially in neuro-oncological patients. To date, the risk of PICC-related complications in this subset of patients is unknown, as is tolerability. As a primary objective, this study aimed to collect complications related to PICCs in primary neuro-oncological patients. As a secondary objective, the study aimed to evaluate PICC tolerability.

METHODS

Neuro-oncological patients with PICCs that were placed as part of normal clinical practice at IRCCS Neurologico C. Besta were consecutively enrolled in the study. PICC-related complications were recorded immediately (during the procedure), early (within 1 week after PICC insertion), and late (1-3-5 months after PICC placement). At the same time points, all patients were also evaluated for tolerability through interviews with semi-structured, open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled (41 males and 19 females, with a median age of 56.2 years). Excluding loss to follow-up, 33/49 patients developed at least one complication related to the PICC. Immediate complications mainly included hematoma (8), accidental arterial puncture (4), and primary malpositioning (3). Regarding early and late complications, 3 device-related infections, 8 thrombotic events, and 20 mechanical complications were registered. Semi-structured interviews revealed an overall positive experience with the device. The most negative impact was on hygiene habits, with 34 patients becoming caregiver-dependent. Over time, almost all patients became used to the device and perceived greater security during chemotherapy. A strongly negative issue was the difficulty of relying on competently trained healthcare personnel in outpatient setting.

CONCLUSION

The results showed a nonnegligible increased thromboembolic risk in neuro-oncological patients with PICCs, almost double that in historical oncological populations. It is essential to extend the study to a greater number of patients to achieve reliable results and to identify patients at high risk. The device seems to be positively accepted by the majority of patients, without affecting activities of daily living.

P05.02 A phase I/IIa dose escalation study evaluating the safety and efficacy of autologous CD34+ enriched hematopoietic progenitor cells genetically modified for human interferon-α2 in patients with GBM and an unmethylated MGMT promoter (TEM-GBM-001)

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Most patients with GBM & an unmethylated O-6-methylguanine-DNA methylase (MGMT) gene promoter, have a poor prognosis with approximately 20% of patients surviving to 2 years. Poor prognosis is likely related to a number of factors including a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME in GBM is mainly composed of tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) & microglia. A subset of tumor-infiltrating macrophages characterized by expression of the angiopoietin receptor Tie2 (TEMs) have features of M2-TAMs, promote tumor angiogenesis & are infrequently found in normal organs. Tie2 is significantly upregulated upon homing to tumors. Gene therapy technology has allowed TEMs to be used as carriers for the local and tumor restricted release of interferon-α (IFN). IFN has antitumor effects, inhibits angiogenesis & modulates the immune system. Cell-based delivery of IFN into the TME by TEMs is expected to provide efficacy, taking advantage of pleiotrophic anti-tumor effects & avoiding tolerability issues associated with systemic IFN treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We are currently conducting a Phase I/IIa clinical study in Milan to evaluate this therapeutic approach (Temferon) in 21 patients with GBM & unmethylated MGMT promoter (EudraCT Number 2018- 001404-11). The study recruits & follows up patients at a specialist neurosurgical & neuro-oncology unit (INCB); administration of Temferon & hematological follow up takes place at a specialist hematology & bone marrow transplantation unit at OSR. Potentially eligible patients are identified immediately after first surgical resection of GBM once the MGMT promoter methylator status is known. Once screening procedures have been completed, harvesting of HSPCs occurs followed by 6 weeks of radiotherapy. Patients receive a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of BCNU & thiotepa. This is followed by administration of non-manipulated HSPCs and Temferon. In-patient monitoring occurs until hematological recovery. Thereafter, regular follow-up of patients occurs up to 2 years (+720 days) and patients will be invited to participate in a long term follow-up study lasting an additional 6 years.

RESULTS

In Part A of the study, 3 cohorts of 3 patients will receive escalating doses of Temferon. On completion of Part A, a single dose of Temferon will be selected to be studied in a further 12 patients in Part B. Criteria for study eligibility are the same for both Part A and Part B. In the event that GBM disease progression occurs, patients will be managed with second line therapies including second surgery, TMZ, BCNU, fotemustine or any other approved therapy for GBM. Patient recruitment for Part A is ongoing with the first dose of Temferon administered in July 2019.

P14.64 Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) with HD- MTX based chemotherapy: tolerability and results

BACKGROUND

Primary Central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas (PCNSL) are extranodal, malignant non- Hodgkin lymphomas of the diff use large B-cell type, confined to CNS. It accounts for up to 1% of all lymphomas and about 3% of all CNS tumours. The incidence continues to rise in immuno- competent elderly patients.Although the prognosis of PCNSL remains poor, it has improved in the past two decades as a result of better treatment strategies. However, treatment recommendations still result mainly from retrospective series or single-arm phase 2 studies and a few three completed randomised trials. We described a series of patients with newly diagnosis of PCNSL treated with modified-schedula published by Omuro

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients was treated with HD-MTX, procarbazine, vincristine, received four 28-day cycles of chemotherapy, on schedule: HD-MTX (3·5 g/m²) days 1 and 15; Procarbazine (100 mg/m²) on days 1–7. Vincristine (1·4 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. The International PCNSL Collaborative Group Response Criteria were used for response assessment. Endpoints include overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

21 immunocompetent patients (12 females and 9 males) were retrospectively studied, among 2014 to 2019. Median age at diagnosis 61 years (range 41–76). Median KPS at diagnosis was 70 (range 40–100). Clinical and radiological data and treatment related toxicity were described

CONCLUSION

Present combination regimen is effective; however, AE incidence is high, and often induces schedule modification

OS7.3 Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation in the REGOMA trial: a randomized, phase II clinical trial analyzing regorafenib activity in relapsed glioblastoma patients

BACKGROUND

REGOMA trial showed that regorafenib (REG) significantly improved OS and PFS in patients (pts) with relapsed GBM with respect to lomustine (LOM). REG showed a different toxicity profile compared to LOM. Here, we report final results of the HRQoL assessment, a secondary end point.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain module (QLQ-BN20) administered before any MRI assessments, every 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) until disease progression. To evaluate treatment impact on HRQoL, questionnaires at progression were excluded. Mixed-effect linear models were fitted for each of the HRQOL domain to examine the change over progression-free time within and between arms. The models included the time of questionnaire assessment, the treatment group and their interaction, as fixed effects, and a compound symmetry covariance structure for the random effects. Differences of at least 10 points were classified as a clinically meaningful change. To correct for multiple comparisons and to avoid type I error, the level of significance was set at P=0.01 (2-sided).

RESULTS

Of 119 randomized pts, 117 partecipated in the HRQoL evaluation, and 114 had a baseline assessment (n=56 REG; n=58 LOM). No statistically significant differences were observed in any generic or cancer specific domain during treatment in the REG and LOM arms, or between the two arms, except for the appetite loss scale which was significantly worse in PTS treated with REG (Global mean 14.7 (SD=28.6) vs 7.6 (SD=16.0); p=0.0081). The rate of pts with a clinically meaningful worsening for appetite loss was not statistically different between the two arms (9 out of 24 and 0 out of 13 in the REG and LOM arm, respectively;p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

In the REGOMA trial, HRQoL did not change during regorafenib treatment. Pts treated with regorafenib and lomustine reported no significant difference in HRQoL.

P11.08 Defining EGFR amplification status for clinical trial inclusion

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine trials targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in glioblastoma patients require selection for EGFR-amplified tumors. However, there is currently no golden standard in determining the amplification status of EGFR or EGFRvIII expression. Here, we aimed to determine which technique and which cut-offs are suitable to determine EGFR amplification status.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We compared fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) and RT-qPCR data from patients screened for trial inclusion into the Intellance 2 clinical trial, with data from a panel-based next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (both DNA and RNA).

RESULTS

By using data from >1000 samples, we show which cut-offs are optimal to determine EGFR gene amplification by FISH. Our data also show that gene amplification (as determined by FISH) correlates with EGFR expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) with ROC analysis showing an under the curve area of up to 0.902. EGFR expression as assessed by RT-qPCR therefore may function as a surrogate marker for EGFR amplification. Our NGS data shows that EGFR copy numbers can strongly vary between tumors with levels ranging from 2 to more than 100 copies per cell. Levels exceeding 5 gene copies can be used to define EGFR-amplification by NGS; below this level FISH detects very few (if any) EGFR amplified nuclei and none of the samples express EGFRvIII.

CONCLUSION

Our data from central laboratories and diagnostic sequencing facilities, using material from patients eligible for clinical trial inclusion, help defining the optimal cut-off for various techniques to determine EGFR amplification for diagnostic purposes.

P14.74 Remarkable response to Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in two Adults with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis secondary to Pleomorphic Xantoastrocytoma grade II with BRAFv600E mutation

BACKGROUND

Several cancers with the BRAF V600E mutations have been successfully treated with targeted therapy. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare brain tumor, with an incidence of 0.07cases per 100,000. The BRAFV600 mutation is present in 38–60% of PXA. Typical treatment is gross total resection, followed by radiotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy at recurrence

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two cases are described.

RESULTS

The first case is a 37 old man with a left temporal lobe lesion who underwent a craniotomy with total tumor resection. Histological diagnosis was PXA WHO grade 2with BRAF V600E mutation.Five months after, MR imaging of his brain and spine showed tumor progression with extensive leptomeningeal disease. The patient received adjuvant brain and spinal radiotherapy Two weeks after, due to rapid clinical worsening he had a new brain and spinal MRI showing hydrocephalus and progression of the pachymeningeal-based masses and received an emergency ventricular -peritoneal shunt. Given the genetic analysis, the extent of disease and rapidity of the progression, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, dabrafenib (150 mg, twice daily) and trametinib (2 mg, daily) were started. Remarkably, within 2 week of initiating dual-targeted therapy, the patient experienced a dramatic improvement in consciousness and overall strength; brainand spinal MRI revealed initial reduction of the leptomenigeal enhacement and no evidence of progression of the intraparenchymal disease. The therapy was well-tolerated. Currently, after sixteen months,the patient remains on treatment with a consistent functional status improvement and no radiological evidence of disease progression. The second case is a 51 old women who developed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis seven year after resection of a frontal left PXA WHO grade 2 with BRAFv600E mutation. The patient had received brain radiotherapy five years after diagnosis and Cyber Knife for tumor progression. Ten months later MR imaging of his brain and spine showed tumor progression with extensive leptomeningeal disease, she was treated with temozolomide for 8 after clinical and radiological worsening she had a second surgery with resection of recurrent frontale left lesion Histopathology PXA WHO grade 2 with BRAF V600E mutation. She developed hydrocephalus, received an emergency ventricular -peritoneal shunt. BRAF and MEK inhibitors, dabrafenib (150 mg, twice daily) and trametinib (2 mg, daily) were started three months ago with initial clinical benefit

CONCLUSION

All patients with PXA should be tested for the BRAFV600 mutation, since, in these cases, targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors seems to be a useful option for salvage treatment.