1
|
Sangro B, Chan SL, Kelley RK, Lau G, Kudo M, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Yarchoan M, De Toni EN, Furuse J, Kang YK, Galle PR, Rimassa L, Heurgué A, Tam VC, Van Dao T, Thungappa SC, Breder V, Ostapenko Y, Reig M, Makowsky M, Paskow MJ, Gupta C, Kurland JF, Negro A, Abou-Alfa GK. Four-year overall survival update from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:448-457. [PMID: 38382875 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus sorafenib; durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for OS. Results reported herein are from a 4-year updated OS analysis of HIMALAYA. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants with uHCC and no previous systemic treatment were randomized to STRIDE (n = 393), durvalumab (n = 389), or sorafenib (n = 389). The updated data cut-off was 23 January 2023. OS and serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Additionally, baseline characteristics and subsequent therapies were analyzed in long-term survivors (≥36 months beyond randomization). RESULTS For STRIDE, durvalumab, and sorafenib, median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 49.12 months (46.95-50.17 months), 48.46 months (46.82-49.81 months), and 47.31 months (45.08-49.15 months), respectively. OS hazard ratio (95% CI) for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (0.67-0.92). The 36-month OS rate for STRIDE was 30.7% versus 19.8% for sorafenib. The 48-month OS rate remained higher for STRIDE at 25.2%, versus 15.1% for sorafenib. The long-term OS benefit of STRIDE was observed across clinically relevant subgroups and was further improved in participants who achieved disease control. Long-term survivors with STRIDE (n = 103) included participants across clinically relevant subgroups, and 57.3% (59/103) had no reported subsequent anticancer therapy. No new serious treatment-related AEs occurred with STRIDE from the primary analysis (17.5%; 68/388). Durvalumab maintained OS noninferiority to sorafenib and no late-onset safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS These data represent the longest follow-up to date in phase III studies in uHCC. The unprecedented 3- and 4-year OS rates reinforce the sustained long-term OS benefit of STRIDE versus sorafenib. STRIDE maintained a tolerable yet differentiated safety profile from other current uHCC therapies. Results continue to support the long-term benefits of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology
- Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Liver Neoplasms/mortality
- Liver Neoplasms/pathology
- Male
- Female
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Middle Aged
- Aged
- Sorafenib/administration & dosage
- Sorafenib/therapeutic use
- Sorafenib/adverse effects
- Survival Rate
- Adult
Collapse
|
2
|
El-Khoueiry AB, Trojan J, Meyer T, Yau T, Melero I, Kudo M, Hsu C, Kim TY, Choo SP, Kang YK, Yeo W, Chopra A, Soleymani S, Yao J, Neely J, Tschaika M, Welling TH, Sangro B. Nivolumab in sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: 5-year follow-up from CheckMate 040. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:381-391. [PMID: 38151184 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) have a poor prognosis and high mortality. Nivolumab monotherapy demonstrated clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile in patients with aHCC in the CheckMate 040 study. Five-year follow-up of the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced groups of CheckMate 040 is presented here. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received nivolumab monotherapy at dose levels of 0.1-10.0 mg/kg (dose-escalation phase) or 3 mg/kg (dose-expansion phase) every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability (dose escalation), and objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and by investigator as per RECIST version 1.1 (dose expansion). RESULTS Eighty sorafenib-naive and 154 sorafenib-experienced patients were treated. Minimum follow-up in both groups was 60 months. ORR as per BICR was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 30%] and 14% (95% CI 9% to 21%) in the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced groups, respectively. Responses occurred regardless of HCC etiology or baseline tumor cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels. Median overall survival (OS) was 26.6 months (95% CI 16.6-30.6 months) and 15.1 months (95% CI 13.0-18.2 months) in sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients, respectively. The 3-year OS rates were 28% in the sorafenib-naive and 20% in the sorafenib-experienced groups; 5-year OS rates were 14% and 12%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 33% and 21% of patients in the sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced groups, respectively. Biomarker analyses showed that baseline PD-L1 expression ≥1% was associated with higher ORR and longer OS compared with PD-L1 <1%. In the sorafenib-naive group, patients with OS ≥3 years exhibited higher baseline CD8 T-cell density compared with those with OS <1 year. CONCLUSION With 5 years of follow-up, nivolumab monotherapy continued to provide durable clinical benefit with manageable safety in sorafenib-naive and sorafenib-experienced patients with aHCC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yokoyama S, Nakagawa J, Kudo M, Aiuchi N, Seito T, Isida M, Mikami T, Ihara K, Nakaji S, Niioka T. Impact of solute carrier transporter gene polymorphisms on serum creatinine concentrations in healthy volunteers. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2023; 11:e01048. [PMID: 36594679 PMCID: PMC9809111 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in solute carrier (SLC) transporters, that is, SLC22A7 c.1586 + 206A > G, SLC22A2 c.808G > T, SLC22A3 c.1233G > A, SLC47A1 c.922-158G > A, and SLC47A2 c.-130G > A, on serum creatinine (SCr) concentrations. This cross-sectional study included residents who participated as volunteers in a health promotion study. Lifestyle data, blood chemical analysis data, and SLC gene polymorphism information were collected from each participant. Univariate analyses were carried out to determine differences between groups and correlations in SCr. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to confirm the independence of factors that were significantly different in the univariate analyses. In multiple regression analyses, muscle mass, serum cystatin C concentrations, body fat percentage, serum albumin concentrations, and SLC47A2 c.-130G/G had the highest contribution to SCr concentrations, in that order (standardized regression coefficients = .505, .332, -.234, .123, and .084, respectively). The final model explained 72.2% of the variability in SCr concentrations. The SLC47A2 c.-130G > A polymorphism may affect creatinine dynamics in the proximal tubules. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of SLC transporter gene polymorphisms on SCr concentrations in patients with various diseases in real-world clinical settings.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoshida S, Minaga K, Watanabe T, Kudo M. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic: Multiple pancreatic masses with rich vascularity. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:10. [PMID: 36470656 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
5
|
Persano M, Rimini M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M, Cheon J, Finkelmeier F, Rimassa L, Presa J, Masi G, Yoo C, Lonardi S, Piscaglia F, Burgio V, Scartozzi M, Cascinu S, Casadei Gardini A. 67P Real-world data for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
6
|
Rimini M, Casadei Gardini A, Persano M, Suda G, Tada T, Shimose S, Kudo M, Cheon J, Finkelmeier F, Rimassa L, Presa J, Masi G, Yoo C, Lonardi S, Tovoli F, Piscaglia F, Iavarone M, Scartozzi M, Burgio V, Cascinu S, Cucchetti A. 65P Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population. IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
7
|
Rimini M, Casadei-Gardini A, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M, Cheon J, Finkelmeier F, Lim H, Rimassa L, Presa J, Masi G, Yoo C, Lonardi S, Tovoli F, Cascinu S, Cucchetti A. 84P Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
|
8
|
Chan S, Kudo M, Sangro B, Kelley R, Furuse J, Park JW, Sunpaweravong P, Fasolo A, Yau T, Kawaoka T, Cheng AL, Azevedo S, Reig Monzon M, Assenat E, Yarchoan M, He A, Makowsky M, Gupta C, Negro A, Abou-Alfa G. 67O Outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
|
9
|
Rimini M, Rimassa L, Ueshima K, Burgio V, Shigeo S, Tada T, Suda G, Yoo C, Cheon J, Pinato DJ, Lonardi S, Scartozzi M, Iavarone M, Di Costanzo GG, Marra F, Soldà C, Tamburini E, Piscaglia F, Masi G, Cabibbo G, Foschi FG, Silletta M, Pressiani T, Nishida N, Iwamoto H, Sakamoto N, Ryoo BY, Chon HJ, Claudia F, Niizeki T, Sho T, Kang B, D'Alessio A, Kumada T, Hiraoka A, Hirooka M, Kariyama K, Tani J, Atsukawa M, Takaguchi K, Itobayashi E, Fukunishi S, Tsuji K, Ishikawa T, Tajiri K, Ochi H, Yasuda S, Toyoda H, Ogawa C, Nishimur T, Hatanaka T, Kakizaki S, Shimada N, Kawata K, Tanaka T, Ohama H, Nouso K, Morishita A, Tsutsui A, Nagano T, Itokawa N, Okubo T, Arai T, Imai M, Naganuma A, Koizumi Y, Nakamura S, Joko K, Iijima H, Hiasa Y, Pedica F, De Cobelli F, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Kudo M, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an international propensity score matching analysis. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100591. [PMID: 36208496 PMCID: PMC9808460 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence suggests that non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) might benefit less from immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with non-viral advanced HCC, treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib, or sorafenib, in 36 centers in 4 countries (Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, and UK). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib, and OS and PFS with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib. For the primary and secondary endpoints, we carried out the analysis on the whole population first, and then we divided the cohort into two groups: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) population and non-NAFLD/NASH population. RESULTS One hundred and ninety patients received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 569 patients received lenvatinib, and 210 patients received sorafenib. In the whole population, multivariate analysis showed that treatment with lenvatinib was associated with a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.95; P = 0.0268] and PFS (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.86; P = 0.002) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the NAFLD/NASH population, multivariate analysis confirmed that lenvatinib treatment was associated with a longer OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P = 0.0110) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.82; P = 0.031) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the subgroup of non-NAFLD/NASH patients, no difference in OS or PFS was observed between patients treated with lenvatinib and those treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. All these results were confirmed following propensity score matching analysis. By comparing patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib, no statistically significant difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS The present analysis conducted on a large number of advanced non-viral HCC patients showed for the first time that treatment with lenvatinib is associated with a significant survival benefit compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, in particular in patients with NAFLD/NASH-related HCC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kawaguchi Y, Kita R, Kimura T, Goto R, Takayama T, Izumi N, Kudo M, Kaneko S, Yamanaka N, Inomata M, Shimada M, Baba H, Koike K, Omata M, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y, Yamada Y, Kokudo N, Hasegawa K. 723P Medical expenditures and treatment efficacy of patients who had initial hepatocellular carcinoma and underwent surgery or radiofrequency ablation: Accompanying research of the SURF trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
11
|
Chan L, Kudo M, Sangro B, Kelley R, Furuse J, Park JW, Sunpaweravong P, Fasolo A, Yau T, Kawaoka T, Cheng AL, Azevedo S, Reig Monzon M, Assenat E, Yarchoan M, He A, Makowsky M, Ran D, Negro A, Abou-Alfa G. 714P Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
12
|
Yamamoto M, Kubo S, Hirama N, Teranishi S, Tashiro K, Seki K, Maeda C, Hiro S, Kajita Y, Sugimoto C, Segawa W, Nagayama H, Nagaoka S, Kudo M, Kaneko T. 1089P Hepcidin expression as a predictive biomarker for anti-PD1/PDL1 antibody monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
13
|
Finn R, Kudo M, Merle P, Meyer T, Qin S, Ikeda M, Xu R, Edeline J, Ryoo BY, Ren Z, Cheng AL, Galle P, Kaneko S, Kumada H, Wang A, Mody K, Dubrovsky L, Siegel A, Llovet J. LBA34 Primary results from the phase III LEAP-002 study: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib as first-line (1L) therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
14
|
Rimini M, Rimassa L, Kudo M, Shigeo S, Toshifumi T, Suda G, Yoo C, Cheon J, Lonardi S, Scartozzi M, Tamburini E, Masi G, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. SO-14 Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: An international study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
15
|
Melero I, Yau T, Kang Y, Kim T, Santoro A, Sangro B, Kudo M, Hou M, Matilla A, Tovoli F, Knox J, He A, El-Rayes B, Acosta-Rivera M, Lim H, Soleymani S, Yao J, Neely J, Tschaika M, Hsu C, El-Khoueiry A. SO-12 Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): 5-year results from CheckMate 040. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
16
|
Kudo M, Finn R, Ikeda M, Zhu A, Sung M, Baron A, Okusaka T, Kobayashi M, Kumada H, Kaneko S, Pracht M, Meyer T, Nagao S, Saito K, Mody K, Dubrovsky L, Llovet J. 68P A phase Ib study of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (LEN + PEMBRO) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Study 116 follow-up analysis. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.10.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
17
|
Rimini M, Kudo M, Tada T, Shigeo S, Kang W, Suda G, Jefremow A, Burgio V, Iavarone M, Tortora R, Marra F, Lonardi S, Tamburini E, Piscaglia F, Masi G, Cabibbo G, Foschi FG, Silletta M, Kumada T, Iwamoto H, Aoki T, Goh MJ, Sakamoto N, Siebler J, Hiraoka A, Niizeki T, Ueshima K, Sho T, Atsukawa M, Hirooka M, Tsuji K, Ishikawa T, Takaguchi K, Kariyama K, Itobayashi E, Tajiri K, Shimada N, Shibata H, Ochi H, Yasuda S, Toyoda H, Fukunishi S, Ohama H, Kawata K, Tani J, Nakamura S, Nouso K, Tsutsui A, Nagano T, Takaaki T, Itokawa N, Okubo T, Arai T, Imai M, Joko K, Koizumi Y, Hiasa Y, Cucchetti A, Ratti F, Aldrighetti L, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hepatocarcinoma: new insights about its prognostic role in patients treated with lenvatinib. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100330. [PMID: 34847382 PMCID: PMC8710492 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment remains a big challenge in the field of oncology. The liver disease (viral or not viral) underlying HCC turned out to be crucial in determining the biologic behavior of the tumor, including its response to treatment. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the role of the etiology of the underlying liver disease in survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on a large cohort of patients treated with lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC from both Eastern and Western institutions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Among the 1232 lenvatinib-treated HCC patients, 453 (36.8%) were hepatitis C virus positive, 268 hepatitis B virus positive (21.8%), 236 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) correlate (19.2%) and 275 had other etiologies (22.3%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-6.7 months] and the median overall survival (mOS) was 15.8 months (95% CI 14.9-17.2 months). In the univariate analysis for OS NASH-HCC was associated with longer mOS [22.2 versus 15.1 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.85; P = 0.0006]. In the univariate analysis for PFS NASH-HCC was associated with longer mPFS (7.5 versus 6.5 months; HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99; P = 0.0436). The multivariate analysis confirmed NASH-HCC (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48-0.86; P = 0.0028) as an independent prognostic factor for OS, along with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, extrahepatic spread, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, portal vein thrombosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and alpha-fetoprotein. An interaction test was performed between sorafenib and lenvatinib cohorts and the results highlighted the positive predictive role of NASH in favor of the lenvatinib arm (P = 0.0047). CONCLUSION NASH has been identified as an independent prognostic factor in a large cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib, thereby suggesting the role of the etiology in the selection of patients for tyrosine kinase treatment. If validated, this result could provide new insights useful to improve the management of these patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kudo M, Finn R, Galle P, Zhu A, Ducreux M, Cheng AL, Verret W, Gaillard V, Nicholas A, Lencioni R. 932P IMbrave150: Exploratory efficacy and safety results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS) treated with atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) or sorafenib (sor). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
19
|
Laethem JLV, Borbath I, Karwal M, Verslype C, Van Vlierberghe H, Kardosh A, Zagonel V, Stal P, Sarker D, Palmer D, Vogel A, Edeline J, Cattan S, Kudo M, Cheng AL, Ogasawara S, Siegel A, Chisamore M, Wang A, Zhu A. 933P Updated results for pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase II KEYNOTE-224 study. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
Ikeda M, Yamashita T, Ogasawara S, Kudo M, Inaba Y, Morimoto M, Tsuchiya K, Shimizu S, Kojima Y, Hiraoka A, Nouso K, Aikata H, Numata K, Sato T, Okusaka T, Furuse J. 937P Multicenter phase II trial of lenvatinib plus hepatic intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: LEOPARD. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
21
|
Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Matsuyama Y, Midorikawa Y, Shiina S, Izumi N, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Sakamoto M, Kubo S, Kudo M, Murakami T, Nakashima O. Prognostic grade for resecting hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre retrospective study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:412-418. [PMID: 33793713 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is advancing, but a robust prediction model for survival after resection is not available. The aim of this study was to propose a prognostic grading system for resection of HCC. METHODS This was a retrospective, multicentre study of patients who underwent first resection of HCC with curative intent between 2000 and 2007. Patients were divided randomly by a cross-validation method into training and validation sets. Prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive model was built by decision-tree analysis to define the resection grades, and subsequently validated. RESULTS A total of 16 931 patients from 795 hospitals were included. In the training set (8465 patients), four surgical grades were classified based on prognosis: grade A1 (1236 patients, 14.6 per cent; single tumour 3 cm or smaller and anatomical R0 resection); grade A2 (3614, 42.7 per cent; single tumour larger than 3 cm, or non-anatomical R0 resection); grade B (2277, 26.9 per cent; multiple tumours, or vascular invasion, and R0 resection); and grade C (1338, 15.8 per cent; multiple tumours with vascular invasion and R0 resection, or R1 resection). Five-year survival rates were 73.9 per cent (hazard ratio (HR) 1.00), 64.7 per cent (HR 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 1.78), 50.6 per cent (HR 2.53, 2.15 to 2.98), and 34.8 per cent (HR 4.60, 3.90 to 5.42) for grades A1, A2, B, and C respectively. In the validation set (8466 patients), the grades had equivalent reproducibility for both overall and recurrence-free survival (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This grade is used to predict prognosis of patients undergoing resection of HCC.
Collapse
|
22
|
Sangro B, Numata K, Huang Y, Gomez-Martin C, Hiraoka A, Moriguchi M, Shen Y, Horvath A, Feely W, Young T, Neely J, Kudo M. P-61 Relatlimab + nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are naive to immuno-oncology therapy but progressed on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a phase 2, randomized, open-label study: RELATIVITY-073. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Li D, Cheng A, Lim H, Llovet J, Zhu Y, Hatogai K, Siegel A, Kudo M. P-135 Pembrolizumab/quavonlimab coformulation in combination with lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Phase 2 trial in progress. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
24
|
Vogel A, Zhu A, Cheng A, Yau T, Zhou J, Kim E, Malhotra U, Siegel A, Kudo M. Abstract No. 210 KEYNOTE-937 trial in progress: adjuvant pembrolizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma and complete radiologic response after surgical resection or local ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
25
|
Sangro B, Harding J, Johnson M, Palmer D, Edeline J, Abou-Alfa G, Cheng A, Decaens T, El-Khoueiry A, Finn R, Galle P, Park J, Yau T, Begic D, Shen Y, Neely J, Sama A, Kudo M. Abstract No. 117 A phase 3, double-blind, randomized study of nivolumab and Ipilimumab), nivolumab monotherapy, or placebo plus transarterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|