Radiological-pathological correlation in diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH): imaging and histopathology

AIM

To review histologically confirmed diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) cases and carry out a detailed pathological-radiological correlation to see if computed tomography (CT) can be used to confidently identify DIPNECH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three histologically confirmed DIPNECH patients in the shared database of two NHS Trusts were reviewed. CT images were reviewed by two independent radiologists, each of them with >10 years of experience in thoracic imaging. All histological specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist with >25 years of experience. The diagnosis of DIPNECH was made according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) definition included in the WHO 2015 classification of pulmonary tumours. The results on histology were compared to the presence of nodules and air trapping on CT. Demographic information and, when available, molecular imaging studies and pulmonary function tests were also considered.

RESULTS

There are prototypal clinical and radiological findings reflecting the presence of underlying histological DIPNECH: middle-aged women with multiple small and scattered nodules due to the clustering and proliferation of neuroendocrine cells. At least one larger, dominant, lung nodule reflecting a carcinoid tumour is very common and mosaic attenuation/air trapping is seen approximately in 50% of cases in inspiratory scans. Airflow obstruction is rarely associated with histological bronchial or peribronchial fibrosis, which suggests other mechanisms must be involved in its development.

CONCLUSION

CT can be used to predict pathological DIPNECH in the appropriate clinical setting. It is important to consider DIPNECH to avoid overdiagnosis of more sinister conditions such as lung cancer or metastases.

Long-term survival with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolongs survival versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We further characterized clinical benefit with this regimen in a large pooled patient population and assessed the effect of response on survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from four studies of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC (CheckMate 227 Part 1, 817 cohort A, 568 Part 1, and 012). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, duration of response, and safety were assessed. Landmark analyses of OS by response status at 6 months and by tumor burden reduction in responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab were also assessed.

RESULTS

In the pooled population (N = 1332) with a minimum follow-up of 29.1-58.9 months, median OS was 18.6 months, with a 3-year OS rate of 35%; median PFS was 5.4 months (3-year PFS rate, 17%). Objective response rate was 36%; median duration of response was 23.7 months, with 38% of responders having an ongoing response at 3 years. In patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1%, ≥1%, 1%-49%, or ≥50%, 3-year OS rates were 30%, 38%, 30%, and 48%. Three-year OS rates were 30% and 38% in patients with squamous or non-squamous histology. Efficacy outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to the overall pooled population (median OS, 20.1 months; 3-year OS rate, 34%). In the pooled population, responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab at 6 months had longer post-landmark OS than those with stable or progressive disease; 3-year OS rates were 66%, 22%, and 14%, respectively. Greater depth of response was associated with prolonged survival; in patients with tumor burden reduction ≥80%, 50% to <80%, or 30% to <50%, 3-year OS rates were 85%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in the pooled population.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival benefit and durable response with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in this large patient population further support this first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

Are sexual and reproductive health and rights taught in medical school? Results from a global survey

Our aim was to investigate the inclusion of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) topics in medical curricula and the perceived need for, feasibility of, and barriers to teaching SRHR. We distributed a survey with questions on SRHR content, and factors regulating SRHR content, to medical universities worldwide using chain referral. Associations between high SRHR content and independent variables were analyzed using unconditional linear regression or χ² test. Text data were analyzed by thematic analysis. We collected data from 219 respondents, 143 universities and 54 countries. Clinical SRHR topics such as safe pregnancy and childbirth (95.7%) and contraceptive methods (97.2%) were more frequently reported as taught compared with complex SRHR topics such as sexual violence (63.8%), unsafe abortion (65.7%), and the vulnerability of LGBTQIA persons (23.2%). High SRHR content was associated with high-income level (P = 0.003) and low abortion restriction (P = 0.042) but varied within settings. Most respondents described teaching SRHR as essential to the health of society. Complexity was cited as a barrier, as were cultural taboos, lack of stakeholder recognition, and dependency on fees and ranking.

Administration of a human recombinant apyrase (AZD3366) limits myocardial tissue injury and improves cardiac function in a pig model of STEMI assessed by serial CMR

Background

Mitigating myocardial tissue injury (MTI) remains an unmet clinical need in the reperfusion era. Stimulating adenosine synthesis through the breakdown of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) by apyrase (CD39), an endothelial ADPase, has emerged as a potential new avenue in the reduction of MTI.

Purpose

In this study we examined whether the intravenous administration of a recombinant soluble form of human apyrase (AZD3366) prior to reperfusion limits MTI and improves cardiac function in a pig model of STEMI as assessed by serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Methods

Pigs (n=16) were subjected to STEMI induction (1.5h closed-chest complete LAD coronary balloon occlusion). Immediately prior to reperfusion, pigs were randomized to intravenously receive one single dose of 3 mg/kg AZD3366 (n=8) or vehicle (n=8). Serial-CMR imaging was performed at baseline, 3 days, and 42 days post-MI for the assessment of structural and functional readouts at rest and during dobutamine stress. Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA; challenged by 5, 10 and 20 μM ADP) and ear bleeding time were monitored pre-MI, post-MI and at day 3.

Results

AZD3366 significantly reduced MTI by limiting (around 60%) oedema formation (21.3±6.7 vs. 12.3±6.7 g LV) and infarct size (14.3±6.1 vs. 8.4±3.4 g LV) and preventing microvascular obstruction (2.3±0.9 vs. 0.5±0.5 g LV) at 3 days post-MI, compared to vehicle-administered STEMI pigs (p&lt;0.05). At a functional level, LVEDV and LVESV showed less deterioration in AZD3366 treated animal as compared to vehicle 3 days post-MI (p&lt;0.05) and less numerical decrease of LVEF. Furthermore, AZD3366-treated animals showed no deterioration in LVEF upon dobutamine stress in contrast to vehicle-infused animals, (p&lt;0.05). AZD3366 treatment nearly abolished LTA at all tested ADP doses early post-STEMI, an effect that remained up to 3 days post-infusion but did not affect ear bleeding time at any of the tested time points. No additional effects were seen at 42 days.

Conclusion

Infusion of one single dose of the soluble recombinant apyrase AZD3366 prior to reperfusion exerts cardioprotection by reducing oedema formation, microvascular obstruction and necrosis and improving cardiac performance at rest and after dobutamine stress during the acute post-MI period. Administration of AZD3366 as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care for STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI may reduce myocardial tissue injury.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden

POS1394 ULTRASOUND MAY DETECT SUBCLINICAL INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and despite recent advances in the treatment represents still the major cause of death. It may be established within the first 4 years of SSc and frequently is subclinical [1].

To evaluate the presence of ILD, there are different available tools in addition to the clinical evaluation including respiratory functional tests (RFT) and imaging methods, especially HRCT which remain the mainstay for the diagnosis of SSc-ILD.

It has been recently proposed that pulmonary ultrasound (US) may have a potential role for the assessment of ILD in patients with SSc [2, 3]. Despite the growing body of evidence, there are no established data regarding its potential role in both detecting ILD in subclinical stages and on the follow-up of SSc patients.

Objectives

To investigate the validity of US in detecting subclinical ILD in SSc and to determine its potential in the follow-up of these patients.

Methods

133 patients without respiratory symptoms and 133 healthy controls were included. Borg scale dyspnea index, Rodnan skin score (RSS) and pulmonary auscultation were performed. X-ray and respiratory function tests (RFT) were performed the same day. An expert rheumatologist blinded to clinical assessment performed the US. To determine the concurrent validity high-resolution CT (HRCT) scans was performed. HRCT findings were scored according to Warrick score whereas US findings were classified according the previously proposed scale. An inter-observer reliability was performed. A follow-up including US, RFT and Borg scale was done every 3 months for 12 months.

Results

A total of 54 of 133 SSc patients (40.6%) showed US signs of ILD in contrast to healthy controls (4.8%) (p=0.0001). The clinical and laboratory variables associated with ILD were anti-centromere antibodies (p=0.005) and RSS (p=0.004). A positive correlation was demonstrated between the US and HRCT findings (p=0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of US in detecting ILD was 91.2% and 88.6% respectively. A good inter-observer reliability was also observed (k = 0.72).

In the follow-up, a total of 30 patients (22.6%) that demonstrated US signs of ILD at baseline showed US worsening. Nine patients (30%) developed symptoms of ILD.

Conclusion

US is valid to detect subclinical ILD-SSc. Our results showed a high prevalence of this complication. Despite encouraging data, it seems still controversial its role in monitoring the ILD progression in SSc.

References

[1]Salaffi F, Carotti M, Baldelli S, et al. Subclinical interstitial lung involvement in rheumatic diseases. Correlation of high resolution computerized tomography and functional and cytologic findings. Radiol Med 1999;97:33-41.

[2]Tardella M, Gutierrez M, Salaffi F, et al. Ultrasound in the assessment of pulmonary fibrosis in connective tissue disorders: correlation with high-resolution computed tomography. J Rheumatol 2012; 39:1641-47.

[3]Gargani L, Doveri M, D’Errico L, et al. Ultrasound lung comets in systemic sclerosis: a chest sonography hallmark of pulmonary interstitial fibrosis. Rheumatology 2009;48:1382-87.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1393 ULTRASOUND AS A POTENTIAL TOOL TO DETECT INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN DAILY CLINICAL SETTING OF PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common and relevant pulmonary complication, that contributes significantly to increased morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thus, increased awareness of this complication is a real challenge in the clinical setting; in particular, an accurate strategy to detect RA-ILD is crucial to assure the survival and quality of life of RA patients.

In the last years, the pulmonary ultrasound (US) has been proposed to assess ILD in rheumatic diseases [1, 2]. Preliminary results have demonstrated a positive correlation between their findings and those of HRCT and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO).

Although these results are exciting, the value and potential application of US in detect ILD in daily clinical setting of patients with RA remain to be clearly delineated.

Objectives

To investigate the potential role of US in the detection of ILD in a real-life cohort of patients with RA.

Methods

Patients with diagnosis of RA were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent pulmonary examination, laboratory data, DLCO measure, chest HRCT and radiographs, and US examination. A healthy group was included as control group.

US was performed according the 14-intercostal space scanning protocol using the following semiquantitative scale [0 = normal (≤5 B-lines); 1 = slight (≥6 and ≤15 B-lines); 2 = moderate, (≤16 and ≥30 B-lines); 3 = severe (≥30 B-lines)].

Results

A total of 74 RA patients and 74 healthy controls were included. Thirty of 74 patients (40.5%) showed US signs of ILD with respect to the healthy controls (3 subjects, 4.1%) (p=0.0001); whereas HRCT showed ILD in 27 (36.4%) of 74 patients.

Among the 30 patients that showed US findings of ILD, 17 (56.6%) were asymptomatic from respiratory view-point. The sensitivity and specificity of US were 92% and 89% respectively.

A positive correlation between US and HRCT findings were found (p= < 0.0001) whereas no correlation was found with chest radiographs and DLCO findings (p = 0.2971 and 0.7856 respectively). Positive association between US findings and DAS28-ESR, RF and anti-CCP (p=0.0076, 0.0044, 0.0074 respectively) was found.

Feasibility, represented by the mean time spent to perform the pulmonary US assessment was 7.8 minutes (± SD 1.2, range 6 to 10 minutes).

Conclusion

Our results support the potential of US in detect accurately ILD in a real-life cohort of patients with RA and provide a rationale to consider it as a friendly screening tool to be implemented in early phases of the disease.

References

[1]Gutierrez M, Salaffi F, Carotti M, et al. Utility of a simplified ultrasound assessment to assess interstitial pulmonary fibrosis in connective tissue disorders-preliminary results. Arthritis Res Ther 2011Aug 18;13-R134.

[2]Moazedi-Fuerst FC, Kielhauser S, Brickmann K, et al. Sonographic assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015;33:S87-91.

Acknowledgements

To the Pan-American League of Rheumatology Associations (PANLAR).

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0276 TRADITION VS INNOVATION! CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CPPD: INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

Background

Conventional radiography (CR) is widely used as the first-line investigation for calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease, given its widespread use and the low cost. Next to it a series of advanced imaging techniques have been evaluated for accuracy and reliability. Among them, ultrasound (US) has been thoroughly tested and demonstrated to be accurate and reliable for CPPD diagnosis. However, even if there are data on the diagnostic accuracy of US and CR alone, it is not clear if performing both diagnostic tests and in which sequential order provides an added value for the diagnosis of CPPD.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess which diagnostic test performs better for the diagnosis of CPPD and if a combination of the two exams provides an additional value.

Methods

This is an ancillary study of the criterion validity of US in CPPD study1. Consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis requiring total joint replacement were enrolled in 8 centres. Participants underwent US and CR of the affected knee prior to surgery. US was performed by experienced sonographers following the same scanning protocol described in the main study, while CR were performed in weight bearing AP and lateral views and were read by 2 experienced radiologists that reached a consensus on the presence/absence of CPPD. The evaluation of CPPD at the level of menisci and hyaline cartilage (HC) was based on the OMERACT definitions for US and on the new definitions developed by the ACR/EULAR CPPD classification criteria working group for CR [paper under submission]. Patients were classified as having CPPD considering histological examination as reference standard. Diagnostic indexes were calculated for US and CR alone and combined. Poisson models with robust estimation were used to estimate the best sequence of these diagnostic methods for a more accurate diagnosis of CPPD.

Results

51 pts were enrolled (63% F, mean age 74y ± 8). Diagnostic indexes of US and CR alone and combined are indicated in Table 1. Compared to histology, US demonstrated to be a sensitive tool for identification of CPPD at the knee, with a good sensitivity in all sites and in the overall evaluation. Instead, CR was less sensitive, but it was a highly specific exam for CPPD identification. Combining US and CR led to a higher sensitivity compared with CR alone, but a lower specificity compared to both CR and US alone, and it offered no additional increase in diagnostic accuracy. The Figure 1 shows the results of the appropriate sequence of use of US and CR in patients with suspected CPPD: in case of a positive CR at any of the 3 sites (menisci and HC) no additional exam is necessary, and the same in case of a positive US in at least two sites; however in case of a negative CR, US could help in a statistically significant way to identify CPPD patients, and further in case of a positive US in a single site CR can offer additional information.

Table 1.

diagnostic indexes of US, CR and US + CR in the identification of CPPD. MM: medial meniscus, LM: lateral meniscus, HC: hyaline cartilage, SN: sensitivity, SP: specificity, PPV: positive predictive value, NPV: negative predictive value, ACC: accuracy.

USSNSPPPVNPVACCMM0.880.810.820.880.84LM0.880.730.760.860.80HC0.780.860.820.830.82Overall0.920.640.730.890.78CRMM0.32110.610.67LM0.400.960.910.630.69HC0.480.930.850.680.73Overall0.540.920.880.660.73US + CRMM0.880.810.820.880.84LM0.920.690.740.900.80HC0.870.820.800.890.84Overall0.920.560.670.880.75Figure 1.

evaluation of sequence of US and CR

Conclusion

US confirmed a high diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients affected by CPPD at knee level, while CR demonstrated a high specificity but a low sensitivity. Performing both diagnostic tests could make sense in case of a negative CR or in case of an inconclusive US (only one positive site). To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the role of the combination of the two exams in CPPD. Further studies in a large number of patients and in different joints would be helpful to address this point.

References

[1]Filippou G. et al, Ann Rheum Dis, 2020

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Accuracy of synovial fluid analysis compared to histology for the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystals: an ancillary study of the OMERACT US Working Group - CPPD subgroup

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of synovial fluid analysis in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals compared to microscopic analysis of joint tissues as the reference standard. This is an ancillary study of an international, multicentre cross-sectional study performed by the calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) subgroup of the OMERACT Ultrasound working group. Consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) waiting for total knee replacement surgery were enrolled in the study from 2 participating centres in Mexico and Romania. During the surgical procedures, synovial fluid, menisci and hyaline cartilage were collected and analysed within 48 hours from surgery under transmitted light microscopy and compensated polarised light microscopy for the presence/absence of calcium pyrophosphate crystals. All slides were analysed by expert examiners on site, blinded to other findings. A dichotomic score (absence/ presence) was used for scoring both synovial fluid and tissues. Microscopic analysis of knee tissues was considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of synovial fluid analysis in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystals were calculated. 15 patients (53% female, mean age 68 yo ± 8.4) with OA of grade 3 or 4 according to Kellgren-Lawrence scoring were enrolled. 12 patients (80%) were positive for calcium pyrophosphate crystals at the synovial fluid analysis and 14 (93%) at the tissue microscopic analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid analysis compared with histology for CPPD was 87%, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%, the positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 33%. In conclusion synovial fluid analysis proved to be an accurate test for the identification of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals in patients with advanced OA.

AB0629 ACCURACY OF SYNOVIAL FLUID ANALYSIS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE CRYSTALS: AN ANCILLARY STUDY OF OMERACT CRITERION VALIDITY STUDY FOR ULTRASOUND IN CPPD

Background:

Synovial fluid analysis (SFA) via compensated polarized light microscopy is still considered the gold standard for the identification and diagnosis of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition disease (CPPD)-related arthropathies[1], but very few studies have been published about its diagnostic accuracy.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of SFA in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPP) crystals compared to microscopic analysis of joint tissues as the reference standard.

Methods:

This is an ancillary study of an international, multicentre cross-sectional study performed by the CPPD subgroup of the OMERACT Ultrasound working group[2]. Consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) waiting for total knee replacement surgery were enrolled in the study from 2 participating centres, Mexico and Romania. During surgical procedures synovial fluid (SF), menisci and hyaline cartilage were collected and analysed within 48 hours after surgery under transmitted light microscopy and compensated polarised light microscopy for the presence/absence of CPP crystals. All slides were analysed by expert examiners on site, blinded to other findings. A dichotomic score (absence/presence) was used for scoring both SF and tissues. Microscopic analysis of knee tissues was considered the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of SFA in the identification of CPP crystals were calculated.

Results:

15 patients (53% female, mean age 68yo ± 8.4) with OA of grade 3 or 4 according to Kellgren-Lawrence scoring were enrolled. 12 patients (80%) were positive for CPP crystals at SFA and 14 (93%) at tissues microscopic analysis. Among 12 SFA positive patients, all were positive for CPP crystals in either medial or lateral meniscus, and 11 were positive in both; 10 patients were positive at the hyaline cartilage, and all 10 were also positive for at least one meniscus. Regarding the 3 SFA negative patients, only one had no crystals in the examined tissues, while the other 2 patients had CPP crystals in both menisci and hyaline cartilage. The overall diagnostic accuracy of SFA compared to histology analysis for CPPD was 87%, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%, the PPV was 100% and the NPV was 33% (Table 1).

Table 1.

sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid analysis compared to the reference standard. CI: Confidential Interval. SF: synovial fluid, in parentheses: numerators and denominators for all percentages provided.

SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAccuracySF analysis86% (12/14)100% (1/1)100% (12/12)33% (1/3)87% (13/15)(0.65-0.99) CI 95%(0.0-0.25) CI 95%(0.65-0.99) CI 95%(0.0-0.25) CI 95%

Conclusion:

SFA demonstrated to be an accurate test for the identification of CPP crystals in patients with advanced OA. However, is not always feasible and carries some risks for the patient. Considering the availability of validated imaging techniques for the detection of CPPD, such as US, SFA could be used in those patients where imaging and clinical data are not definitely confirmatory of the disease.

References:

[1]W. Zhang et al., ‘European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part I: terminology and diagnosis’, Ann Rheum Dis, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 563–570, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.139105.

[2]G. Filippou et al., ‘Criterion validity of ultrasound in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposits at the knee: an OMERACT ultrasound study’, Ann Rheum Dis, p. annrheumdis-2020-217998, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217998.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS1132 DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE KNEE FOR CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION DISEASE: AN ANCILLARY STUDY OF THE OMERACT ULTRASOUND – CPPD GROUP

Background:

Conventional Radiography (CR) has been widely used in the assessment of knee chondrocalcinosis (CC) and is still considered one of the most important diagnostic methods for the diagnosis. However, there are very few studies that examine the diagnostic accuracy of CR compared to histology of the knee tissues.

Objectives:

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of CR of the knee in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD) by using the recently created definitions for CPPD in CR of the ACR/EULAR taskforce for the new classification criteria for CPPD.

Methods:

This is an ancillary study of the Criterion Validity of Ultrasound in CPPD study [1]. Consecutive patients with osteoarthritis (OA) awaiting total knee replacement were enrolled in 4 centres from Romania, Italy, USA and Mexico. All patients underwent CR of the knees taken maximum 6 months before surgery, in posterior-anterior weight baring and lateral projections. DICOM files of the radiographs were anonymised and read independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists with experience in microcrystalline arthropathies. For each patient, a dichotomic score was used (absence/presence of CC) at the level of the menisci and tibiofemoral hyaline cartilage by each reader. The definitions of the ACR/EULAR taskforce for identification of CPPD in CR were used in this study [paper in preparation]. According to these definitions CPPD in CR appears as “linear or punctate opacities in the region of fibro- or hyaline articular cartilage/synovial membrane or joint capsule/within tendons or entheses that are distinct from denser, nummular radio-opaque deposits due to basic calcium phosphate deposition”. In case of disagreement a consensus decision was taken by both radiologists after discussion of the case. Menisci and the hyaline cartilage were analysed using compensated polarized light microscopy as described previously [1], patients were considered positive for CPPD if at least one of their tissue specimens revealed the presence of calcium pyrophosphate crystals. All examiners were blind to each other’s findings.

Results:

We enrolled 33 patients with OA (61% female, mean age 69yo). The accuracy values of CR in the various sites of the knee are indicated in Table 1. CR demonstrated to be a specific exam for identification of CPPD at the knee, but sensitivity remains low in all sites and in the overall evaluation. Identification of CPPD appears challenging and this could be due to the advanced grade of OA in our cohort of patients. Advanced degeneration, dislocation of the menisci and thinning of the hyaline cartilage in these patients is frequent and the eventual presence of calcific deposits in one of these structures could overlap with other anatomical structures making the exact localisation difficult. According to the results of the predictive values, the presence of typical deposition on CR allows a definite confirmation of the diagnosis, but a negative radiography does not exclude CPPD as testified by the low negative predictive value.

Table 1.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and AUC of CR for identification of CPPD by using the new ACR/EULAR taskforce definitions.

Medial meniscusLateral meniscusHyaline cartilageOverallSensitivity22%33%31%42%Specificity100%100%85%90%Positive predictive value100%100%67%80%Negative predictive value56%60%55%61%Accuracy61%68%58%66%AUC0.60.70.60.7

Conclusion:

CR has been extensively used for the diagnosis of OA and CPPD and has been tested previously for diagnostic accuracy. The results of our study confirm that the presence of typical CPPD calcifications, as defined by the ACR/EULAR task force, are highly specific but have low sensitivity for disease identification when using CR. Absence of CPPD on CR does not exclude the diagnosis.

References:

[1]Filippou G, et al. Criterion validity of ultrasound in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposits at the knee: an OMERACT ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217998

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS1133 RELIABILITY OF CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE KNEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CHONDROCALCINOSIS: AN ANCILLARY STUDY OF THE OMERACT ULTRASOUND – CPPD GROUP

Background:

Conventional Radiography (CR) has been widely used in the assessment of knee chondrocalcinosis (CC) and is still considered one of the most important diagnostic methods for the diagnosis. However, there are no studies on the reliability of CR for CC.

Objectives:

To assess the reliability of CR of the knee in the assessment of chondrocalcinosis (CC).

Methods:

This is an ancillary study of the Criterion Validity of Ultrasound in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD) study [1]. Consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) that were planned for total knee replacement surgery were enrolled in 4 centres from Romania, Italy, USA and Mexico. All patients underwent CR of the knees taken maximum 6 months before surgery, in posterior-anterior weight baring and lateral projections. DICOM files of the radiographs were retrieved, anonymised and read independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists with experience in microcrystalline arthropathies. Each reader performed a second evaluation 3 weeks after the first one to calculate the inter- and intra-reader agreement. For each patient a dichotomic score was assigned (absence/presence of CC) at the level of the medial and lateral menisci, tibiofemoral hyaline cartilage, quadriceps and patella tendons, synovial membrane/joint capsule. The definitions of the ACR/EULAR taskforce for identification of CPPD in conventional radiography were used in this study [paper in preparation]. According to these definitions CPPD in CR appears as “linear or punctate opacities in the region of fibro- or hyaline articular cartilage/synovial membrane or joint capsule/within tendons or entheses that are distinct from denser, nummular radio-opaque deposits due to basic calcium phosphate deposition”. Cohen’s kappa was used to calculate the agreement between the two readers.

Results:

We enrolled 33 patients with knee OA (60.6% female, mean age 69yo ± 8). The kappa values of the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement in the various sites of the knee are indicated in Table 1. Inter-reader agreement was substantial at the level of both menisci but only moderate or fair at the other sites of assessment. This had a negative impact on the overall evaluation of the knee joint that proved to be unreliable (k of 0.16 – none to slight agreement) if all anatomical structures are included for assessment, and moderately reliable (kappa 0.41) when both menisci and hyaline cartilage are considered. On the other hand, intra-reader kappa values were substantial or higher in all sites (except for synovial membrane/joint capsule for one reader). The striking difference of the intra-reader compared to the inter-reader kappa values, highlight a different interpretation and application of the definitions used for most of the sites with the exception of the menisci.

Table 1.

kappa values for intra- and inter-reader agreement. Values from 0.01–0.20 are considered as none to slight agreement, 0.21–0.40 as fair, 0.41– 0.60 as moderate, 0.61–0.80 as substantial, and 0.81–1.00 as almost perfect agreement.

Medial meniscusLateral meniscusHyaline cartilageQuadriceps tendonPatellar tendonCapsule/ synoviaMenisci + cartilageEntire jointInter-reader0.670.710.340.47NA0.370.400.17Intra-reader 1st assessor0.670.900.840.65NA(insufficient number of categories)0.530.710.76Intra-reader 2nd assessor10.801110.910.860.94

Conclusion:

CR has been extensively used for diagnosis of OA and CPPD. The results of our study raise some concerns on the reliability of CR in identification of CPPD. Assessment of calcium crystals at the menisci level should be used for identification of CC as other sites of the knee seem to present low reliability.

References:

[1]Filippou G et al. Criterion validity of ultrasound in the identification of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposits at the knee: an OMERACT ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217998

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

POS1124 IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE DEPOSITION DISEASE (CPPD): RESULTS FROM THE INITIAL PHASES

Background:

Classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) will facilitate clinical research on this common crystalline arthritis. ACR/EULAR are jointly sponsoring development of CPPD classification criteria using a multi-phase process.

Objectives:

To report preliminary results from the first two phases of a four-phase process for developing CPPD classification criteria.

Methods:

CPPD classification criteria development is overseen by a 12-member Steering Committee. Item generation (Phase I) included a scoping literature review of five literature databases and contributions from a 35-member Combined Expert Committee and two Patient Research Partners. Item reduction and refinement (Phase II) involved a Combined Expert Committee meeting, discussions among Clinical, Imaging, and Laboratory Advisory Groups, and an item rating exercise to assess the influence of individual items toward classification. The Steering Committee reviewed the modal rating score for each item (range -3 [strongly pushes away from CPPD] to +3 [strongly pushes toward CPPD]) to determine items to retain for future phases of criteria development.

Results:

Item generation yielded 420 items (312 from the literature, 108 from experts/patients). The Advisory Groups eliminated items they agreed were unlikely to distinguish between CPPD and other forms of arthritis, yielding 127 items for the item rating exercise. Fifty-six items, most of which had a modal rating of +/- 2 or 3, were retained for future phases (see Table 1). As numerous imaging items were rated +3, the Steering Committee recommended focusing on imaging of the knee, wrist, and one additional affected joint for calcification suggestive of CPP crystal deposition.

Conclusion:

The ACR/EULAR CPPD classification criteria working group has adopted both data- and expert-driven approaches, leading to 56 candidate items broadly categorized as clinical, imaging, and laboratory features. Remaining steps for criteria development include domain establishment, item weighting through a multi-criteria decision analysis exercise, threshold score determination, and criteria validation.

Table 1.

Categories of items retained for future phases of classification criteria development

Age in decade at symptom onsetAcute inflammatory arthritis (e.g. knee, wrist, 1st MTP joint*)Recurrence and pattern of joint involvement (e.g. 1 self-limited episode, >1 self-limited episode)Physical findings (e.g. palpable subcutaneous tophus*, psoriasis*)Co-morbidities and family history (e.g. Gitelman disease, hemochromatosis, familial CPPD)Osteoarthritis location and features (e.g. 2nd or 3rd MCP joint, wrist)Synovial fluid findings (e.g. CPP crystals present, CPP crystals absent on 1 occasion* or 2 occasions*, monosodium urate crystals present*)Laboratory findings (e.g. hypomagnesemia, hyperparathyroidism, rheumatoid factor*, anti-CCP*)Plain radiograph: calcification in regions of fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Plain radiograph: calcification of the synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+Conventional CT: calcification in regions of fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Conventional CT: calcification of the synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+Ultrasound: CPP crystal deposition in fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Ultrasound: CPP crystal deposition in synovial membrane/capsule/tendons+Dual-energy CT: CPP crystal deposition in fibro- or hyaline cartilage+Dual-energy CT: CPP crystal deposition in synovial membrane/capsule/tendon+

*Potential negative predictor +Assessed in the knee, wrist, and/or 1 additional affected joint

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Tedeschi Consultant of: NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Tristan Pascart: None declared, Augustin Latourte Consultant of: Novartis, Cattleya Godsave: None declared, Burak Kundaki: None declared, Raymond Naden: None declared, William Taylor: None declared, Nicola Dalbeth Speakers bureau: Abbvie and Janssen, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Dyve, Selecta, Horizon, Arthrosi, and Cello Health, Tuhina Neogi: None declared, Fernando Perez-Ruiz: None declared, Ann Rosenthal: None declared, Fabio Becce Consultant of: Horizon Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: Siemens Healthineers, Eliseo Pascual: None declared, Mariano Andrés: None declared, Thomas Bardin: None declared, Michael Doherty: None declared, Hang Korng Ea: None declared, Georgios Filippou: None declared, John FitzGerald: None declared, Marwin Gutierrez: None declared, Annamaria Iagnocco: None declared, Tim Jansen Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Grunenthal, Olatec, Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Grunenthal, Olatec, Sanofi Genzyme, Minna Kohler Speakers bureau: Lilly, Consultant of: Novartis, Frederic Lioté: None declared, Mark Matza: None declared, Geraldine McCarthy Consultant of: PK Med, Roberta Ramonda: None declared, Anthony Reginato: None declared, Pascal Richette: None declared, Jasvinder Singh Speakers bureau: Simply Speaking, Consultant of: Crealta/Horizon, Medisys, Fidia, UBM LLC, Trio health, Medscape, WebMD, Adept Field Solutions, Clinical Care options, Clearview healthcare partners, Putnam associates, Focus forward, Navigant consulting, Spherix, Practice Point communications, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Alexander So: None declared, Lisa Stamp: None declared, Janeth Yinh: None declared, Chio Yokose: None declared, Robert Terkeltaub Consultant of: Sobi, Horizon Therapeutics, Astra-Zeneca, Selecta, Grant/research support from: Astra-Zeneca, Hyon Choi: None declared, Abhishek Abhishek Consultant of: NGM Biopharmaceuticals.