Obicetrapib on top of maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: rationale and designs of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN

BACKGROUND

Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024.

CONCLUSION

These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated.

Comparative Cardiovascular Benefits of Bempedoic Acid and Statin Drugs

BACKGROUND

In the CLEAR (Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic Acid, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen) Outcomes trial, treatment of statin-intolerant patients with bempedoic acid produced a 21% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relative to placebo and a 13% relative reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether the relationship between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular benefit achieved with bempedoic acid resembles that observed with statins when standardized per unit change in LDL-C.

METHODS

To compare the treatment effect of bempedoic acid with statins, the methodology of the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (CTTC) was applied to outcomes among the 13,970 patients enrolled in the CLEAR Outcomes trial. The CTTC endpoint of "major vascular event" was a composite of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. HRs for CTTC-defined endpoints were normalized to 1 mmol/L differences in LDL-C levels between bempedoic acid and placebo groups.

RESULTS

A first major vascular event occurred in 703 (10.1%) patients in the bempedoic acid group and 816 (11.7%) patients in the placebo group (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94). When normalized per 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL-C, the HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.63-0.90), comparable to the rate ratio of 0.78 reported for statins in the CTTC meta-analysis. Normalized risk reductions were similar for bempedoic acid and statins for the endpoints of major coronary events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular risk reduction with bempedoic acid is similar to that achieved with statins for a given absolute magnitude of LDL-C lowering. (Evaluation of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Participants With, or at High Risk for, Cardiovascular Disease Who Are Statin Intolerant Treated with Bempedoic Acid [ETC-1002] or Placebo [CLEAR Outcomes]; NCT02993406).

Cardiovascular Clinical Trials in the Asia-Pacific Region

This Viewpoint discusses the potential challenges to the operational conduct of clinical trials in the Asia-Pacific region, where there is a high rate of cardiovascular disease, and provides possible solutions.

Cardiovascular Risk in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Challenges and Future Directions

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-cancer related mortality and morbidity among people living with or cured from cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are systemic anti-cancer therapies that have revolutionised the treatment of numerous cancers, even achieving durable long-term responses among patients with metastatic disease. However, the pro-inflammatory effects of ICIs have been postulated to increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in cancer survivorship. Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors can further contribute to ASCVD risk during cancer survivorship but are not routinely screened and are often untreated in patients with cancer. With the expanding use of ICIs leading to improved cancer survivorship, cardiovascular risk identification and prevention will be paramount in the care of patients with cancer. This review highlights the practical challenges associated with ASCVD prevention among the growing number of patients treated with ICIs for cancer, including balancing competing mortality risks from cancer and ASCVD, the lack of ICI-specific cardiovascular risk stratification tools, potential interactions between cardiovascular and oncological therapies, and barriers to implementation of cardiovascular screening and prevention within existing healthcare systems.

Effect of Reconstituted Human Apolipoprotein A-I on Recurrent Ischemic Events in Survivors of Acute MI

BACKGROUND

The AEGIS-II trial hypothesized that CSL112, an intravenous formulation of human apoA-I, would lower the risk of plaque disruption, decreasing the risk of recurrent events such as myocardial infarction (MI) among high-risk patients with MI.

OBJECTIVES

This exploratory analysis evaluates the effect of CSL112 therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) death and recurrent MI.

METHODS

The AEGIS-II trial was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomized 18,219 high-risk acute MI patients to 4 weekly infusions of apoA-I (6 g CSL112) or placebo.

RESULTS

The incidence of the composite of CV death and type 1 MI was 11% to 16% lower in the CSL112 group over the study period (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.7-1.0; P = 0.056 at day 90; HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74-0.99; P = 0.048 at day 180; and HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.01; P = 0.07 at day 365). Similarly, the incidence of CV death or any MI was numerically lower in CSL112-treated patients throughout the follow-up period (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.80-1.05 at day 90, HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.996 at day 180, HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-1.01 at day 365). The effect of CSL112 treatment on MI was predominantly observed for type 1 MI and type 4b (MI due to stent thrombosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Although CSL112 did not significantly reduce the occurrence of the primary study endpoints, patients treated with CSL112 infusions had numerically lower rates of CV death and MI, type-1 MI, and stent thrombosis-related MI compared with placebo. These findings could suggest a role of apoA-I in reducing subsequent plaque disruption events via enhanced cholesterol efflux. Further prospective data would be needed to confirm these observations.

Therapeutic Potential of Lipoprotein(a) Inhibitors

Increasing evidence has implicated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in the causality of atherosclerosis and calcific aortic stenosis. This has stimulated immense interest in developing novel approaches to integrating Lp(a) into the setting of cardiovascular prevention. Current guidelines advocate universal measurement of Lp(a) levels, with the potential to influence cardiovascular risk assessment and triage of higher-risk patients to use of more intensive preventive therapies. In parallel, considerable activity has been undertaken to develop novel therapeutics with the potential to achieve selective and substantial reductions in Lp(a) levels. Early studies of antisense oligonucleotides (e.g., mipomersen, pelacarsen), RNA interference (e.g., olpasiran, zerlasiran, lepodisiran) and small molecule inhibitors (e.g., muvalaplin) have demonstrated effective Lp(a) lowering and good tolerability. These agents are moving forward in clinical development, in order to determine whether Lp(a) lowering reduces cardiovascular risk. The results of these studies have the potential to transform our approach to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 analogues and delipidation of coronary atheroma in statin-treated type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: The prespecified sub-analysis of the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial

Background and aims

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the ability of glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1RAs) to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). How GLP-1RAs modulate diabetic atherosclerosis remains to be determined yet.

Methods

The OPTIMAL study was a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of 48-week continuous glucose monitoring- and HbA1c-guided glycemic control on near infrared spectroscopty (NIRS)/intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived plaque measures in 94 statin-treated patients with T2D (jRCT1052180152, UMIN000036721). Of these, 78 patients with evaluable serial NIRS/IVUS images were analyzed to compare plaque measures between those treated with (n = 16) and without GLP-1RAs (n = 72).

Results

All patients received a statin, and on-treatment LDL-C levels were similar between the groups (66.9 ± 11.6 vs. 68.1 ± 23.2 mg/dL, p = 0.84). Patients receiving GLP-1RAs demonstrated a greater reduction of HbA1c [-1.0 (-1.4 to -0.5) vs. -0.4 (-0.6 to -0.2)%, p = 0.02] and were less likely to demonstrate a glucose level >180 mg/dL [-7.5 (-14.9 to -0.1) vs. 1.1 (-2.0 - 4.2)%, p = 0.04], accompanied by a significant decrease in remnant cholesterol levels [-3.8 (-6.3 to -1.3) vs. -0.1 (-0.8 - 1.1)mg/dL, p = 0.008]. On NIRS/IVUS imaging analysis, the change in percent atheroma volume did not differ between the groups (-0.9 ± 0.25 vs. -0.2 ± 0.2%, p = 0.23). However, GLP-1RA treated patients demonstrated a greater frequency of maxLCBI4mm regression (85.6 ± 0.1 vs. 42.0 ± 0.6%, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the GLP-1RA use was independently associated with maxLCBI4mm regression (odds ratio = 4.41, 95%CI = 1.19-16.30, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

In statin-treated patients with T2D and CAD, GLP-1RAs produced favourable changes in lipidic plaque materials, consistent with its stabilization.

Health economic analysis of polygenic risk score use in primary prevention of coronary artery disease - A system dynamics model

Background

Primary prevention programs utilising traditional risk scores fail to identify all individuals who suffer acute cardiovascular events. We aimed to model the impact and cost effectiveness of incorporating a Polygenic risk scores (PRS) into the cardiovascular disease CVD primary prevention program in Australia, using a whole-of-system model.

Methods

System dynamics models, encompassing acute and chronic CVD care in the Australian healthcare setting, assessing the cost-effectiveness of incorporating a CAD-PRS in the primary prevention setting. The time horizon was 10-years.

Results

Pragmatically incorporating a CAD-PRS in the Australian primary prevention setting in middle-aged individuals already attending a Heart Health Check (HHC) who are determined to be at low or moderate risk based on the 5-year Framingham risk score (FRS), with conservative assumptions regarding uptake of PRS, could have prevented 2, 052 deaths over 10-years, and resulted in 24, 085 QALYs gained at a cost of $19, 945 per QALY with a net benefit of $724 million. If all Australians overs the age of 35 years old had their FRS and PRS performed, and acted upon, 12, 374 deaths and 60, 284 acute coronary events would be prevented, with 183, 682 QALYs gained at a cost of $18, 531 per QALY, with a net benefit of $5, 780 million.

Conclusions

Incorporating a CAD-PRS in a contemporary primary prevention setting in Australia would result in substantial health and societal benefits and is cost-effective. The broader the uptake of CAD-PRS in the primary prevention setting in middle-aged Australians, the greater the impact and the more cost-effective the strategy.

Zodasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic Targeting ANGPTL3, for Mixed Hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) inhibits lipoprotein and endothelial lipases and hepatic uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants. ANGPTL3 loss-of-function carriers have lower levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol and a lower risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease than noncarriers. Zodasiran is an RNA interference (RNAi) therapy targeting expression of ANGPTL3 in the liver.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zodasiran in adults with mixed hyperlipidemia (fasting triglyceride level of 150 to 499 mg per deciliter and either an LDL cholesterol level of ≥70 mg per deciliter or a non-HDL cholesterol level of ≥100 mg per deciliter). Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous injections of zodasiran (50, 100, or 200 mg) or placebo on day 1 and week 12 and were followed through week 36. The primary end point was the percent change in the triglyceride level from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients underwent randomization. At week 24, substantial mean dose-dependent decreases from baseline in ANGPTL3 levels were observed with zodasiran (difference in change vs. placebo, -54 percentage points with 50 mg, -70 percentage points with 100 mg, and -74 percentage points with 200 mg), and significant dose-dependent decreases in triglyceride levels were observed (difference in change vs. placebo, -51 percentage points, -57 percentage points, and -63 percentage points, respectively) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Other differences in change from baseline as compared with placebo included the following: for non-HDL cholesterol level, -29 percentage points with 50 mg, -29 percentage points with 100 mg, and -36 percentage points with 200 mg; for apolipoprotein B level, -19 percentage points, -15 percentage points, and -22 percentage points, respectively; and for LDL cholesterol level, -16 percentage points, -14 percentage points, and -20 percentage points, respectively. We observed a transient elevation in glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with preexisting diabetes who received the highest dose of zodasiran.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, zodasiran was associated with significant decreases in triglyceride levels at 24 weeks. (Funded by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals; ARCHES-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04832971.).

Personalized Intervention Based on Early Detection of Atherosclerosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and challenges the capacity of health care systems globally. Atherosclerosis is the underlying pathophysiological entity in two-thirds of patients with CVD. When considering that atherosclerosis develops over decades, there is potentially great opportunity for prevention of associated events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Subclinical atherosclerosis has been identified in its early stages in young individuals; however, there is no consensus on how to prevent progression to symptomatic disease. Given the growing burden of CVD, a paradigm shift is required-moving from late management of atherosclerotic CVD to earlier detection during the subclinical phase with the goal of potential cure or prevention of events. Studies must focus on how precision medicine using imaging and circulating biomarkers may identify atherosclerosis earlier and determine whether such a paradigm shift would lead to overall cost savings for global health.

Single Ascending and Multiple-Dose Trial of Zerlasiran, a Short Interfering RNA Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Lipoprotein(a) is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic stenosis, with no pharmacological treatments approved by regulatory authorities.

Objectives

To assess the safety and tolerability of zerlasiran, a short interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), and effects on serum concentrations of lipoprotein(a).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Single- and multiple-dose study in healthy participants and patients with stable ASCVD, respectively, with lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations greater than 150 nmol/L, conducted at 7 research sites in the US, the Netherlands, UK, and Australia between November 18, 2020, and February 8, 2023, with last follow-up on August 23, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive (1) a single subcutaneous dose of placebo (n = 8), zerlasiran 300 mg (n = 6) or 600 mg (n = 6); or (2) 2 doses of placebo (n = 9), zerlasiran 200 mg (n = 9) at a 4-week interval or 300 mg (n = 9) or 450 mg (n = 9) at an 8-week interval.

Main Outcomes Measures

The primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included serum levels of zerlasiran and effects on lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations.

Results

Among 37 patients in the multiple-dose group (mean age, 56 [SD, 10.4] years; 15 [42%] women), 36 completed the trial. Among 14 participants with extended follow-up after single doses, 13 completed the trial. There were no serious adverse events. Median baseline lipoprotein(a) concentrations in the multiple-dose group were 288 (IQR, 199-352) nmol/L. Median changes in lipoprotein(a) concentration at 365 days after single doses were 14% (IQR, 13% to 15%) for the placebo group, -30% (IQR, -51% to -18%) for the 300 mg of zerlasiran group, and -29% (IQR, -39% to -7%) for the 600-mg dose group. After 2 doses, maximal median changes in lipoprotein(a) concentration were 19 (IQR, -17 to 28) nmol/L for the placebo group, -258 (IQR, -289 to -188) nmol/L for the 200 mg of zerlasiran group, -310 (IQR, -368 to -274) nmol/L for the 300-mg dose group, and -242 (IQR, -343 to -182) nmol/L for the 450-mg dose group, with maximal median percent change of 7% (IQR, -4% to 21%), -97% (IQR, -98% to -95%), -98% (IQR, -99% to -97%), and -99% (IQR, -99% to -98%), respectively, attenuating to 0.3% (IQR, -2% to 21%), -60% (IQR, -71% to -40%), -90% (IQR, -91% to -74%), and -89% (IQR, -91% to -76%) 201 days after administration.

Conclusions

Zerlasiran was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations with infrequent administration.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04606602.

Apolipoprotein A1 Infusions and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular events frequently recur after acute myocardial infarction, and low cholesterol efflux - a process mediated by apolipoprotein A1, which is the main protein in high-density lipoprotein - has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. CSL112 is human apolipoprotein A1 derived from plasma that increases cholesterol efflux capacity. Whether infusions of CSL112 can reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel coronary artery disease, and additional cardiovascular risk factors. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either four weekly infusions of 6 g of CSL112 or matching placebo, with the first infusion administered within 5 days after the first medical contact for the acute myocardial infarction. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes from randomization through 90 days of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 18,219 patients were included in the trial (9112 in the CSL112 group and 9107 in the placebo group). There was no significant difference between the groups in the risk of a primary end-point event at 90 days of follow-up (439 patients [4.8%] in the CSL112 group vs. 472 patients [5.2%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.05; P = 0.24), at 180 days of follow-up (622 patients [6.9%] vs. 683 patients [7.6%]; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01), or at 365 days of follow-up (885 patients [9.8%] vs. 944 patients [10.5%]; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.02). The percentage of patients with adverse events was similar in the two groups; a higher number of hypersensitivity events was reported in the CSL112 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel coronary artery disease, and additional cardiovascular risk factors, four weekly infusions of CSL112 did not result in a lower risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo through 90 days. (Funded by CSL Behring; AEGIS-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03473223.).

Discovery of potent small-molecule inhibitors of lipoprotein(a) formation

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), an independent, causal cardiovascular risk factor, is a lipoprotein particle that is formed by the interaction of a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a))1,2. Apo(a) first binds to lysine residues of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100) on LDL through the Kringle IV (KIV) 7 and 8 domains, before a disulfide bond forms between apo(a) and apoB-100 to create Lp(a) (refs. 3-7). Here we show that the first step of Lp(a) formation can be inhibited through small-molecule interactions with apo(a) KIV7-8. We identify compounds that bind to apo(a) KIV7-8, and, through chemical optimization and further application of multivalency, we create compounds with subnanomolar potency that inhibit the formation of Lp(a). Oral doses of prototype compounds and a potent, multivalent disruptor, LY3473329 (muvalaplin), reduced the levels of Lp(a) in transgenic mice and in cynomolgus monkeys. Although multivalent molecules bind to the Kringle domains of rat plasminogen and reduce plasmin activity, species-selective differences in plasminogen sequences suggest that inhibitor molecules will reduce the levels of Lp(a), but not those of plasminogen, in humans. These data support the clinical development of LY3473329-which is already in phase 2 studies-as a potent and specific orally administered agent for reducing the levels of Lp(a).

Integrating Cardio-Oncology Across the Research Pipeline, Policy, and Practice in Australia-An Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Perspective

Over 18 million people worldwide were diagnosed with cancer in 2020, including over 150,000 people in Australia. Although improved early detection and treatment have increased the survival rates, cardiotoxic treatment and inadequate management of cardiovascular risk factors have resulted in cardiovascular disease (CVD) being one of the leading causes of non-cancer-related death and disability among cancer survivors. International guidelines outline the standards of care for CVD risk surveillance and management. However, Australian cardio-oncology policies and clinical guidelines are limited. There is increasing growth of cardio-oncology research in Australia and support from leading Australian professional bodies and advocacy and research networks, including the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, the National Heart Foundation of Australia, and the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA). Thus, opportunities to drive multidisciplinary cardio-oncology initiatives are growing, including grant funding, position statements, and novel research to inform new policies. The ACvA has a unique flagship structure that spans the translational research pipeline from drug discovery to implementation science. This article aims to highlight how multidisciplinary cardio-oncology innovations could intersect with the seven ACvA flagships, and to showcase Australian achievements in cardio-oncology thus far. We summarise eight key priority areas for future cardio-oncology research that emerged. These strategies will strengthen cardio-oncology research and care in Australia, and drive new guidelines, policies, and government initiatives to ensure equity in health outcomes for all cardio-oncology patients.

Optimal Medical Therapy for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in 2024: Focus on Blood Pressure and Lipids

Hypertension and dyslipidemia are 2 highly prevalent and modifiable risk factors in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that lowering blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic heart disease. Accordingly, clinical guidelines recommend intensive treatment targets for these high-risk patients. This article summarizes the pathophysiology, supporting evidence, and treatment recommendations for management of hypertension and dyslipidemia among patients with manifest ischemic heart disease and points to future research and unmet clinical needs.

The effectiveness of visualising plaque on cardiac computed tomography in modifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease: A systematic review

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of disease burden worldwide, with a significant proportion of cases and deaths attributable to modifiable risk factors. Recent interest has emerged in using cardiac computed tomography (CT) imaging as a tool to enhance motivation and drive positive behavioural changes. However, the impact of providing visual feedback of plaque from CT on risk factor control and individual health behaviours remains understudied. This study aimed to assess the effects of visual feedback from cardiac CT imaging on health-related behaviours and risk factor control. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, yielding nine studies (five randomised controlled trials and four observational studies) for analysis. The results varied, but based on the limited low-quality data, CT imaging appears to have short-term favourable effects on cholesterol levels and systolic blood pressure reductions, and positive dietary behavioural changes. Further research is warranted to better understand the long-term impact of cardiac CT imaging on health behaviours and risk factor modification.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective therapies for numerous cancers, but have been associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to identify predictors for ASCVD events among cancer patients treated with ICIs and the cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) control of those who developed ASCVD.

METHOD

A single-centre retrospective study of 366 cancer patients who received ICIs from 2018 to 2020 was performed. Demographic, baseline CVRF, cancer history, and ICI regimen data were obtained from medical records. The primary end point of ASCVD events was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, ischaemic stroke, or acute limb ischaemia. Cox proportional multivariable modelling and competing risks analysis were performed to assess ASCVD predictors. Descriptive analysis was performed to describe CVRF management among those who developed ASCVD events.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years (2.8-4.3), 26 patients (7.1%) experienced 27 ASCVD events (seven myocardial infarction, one coronary revascularisation, 13 ischaemic stroke, and six acute limb ischaemia events). There were 226 (61.8%) cancer-related deaths and no cardiac deaths. History of ASCVD before ICI initiation was independently associated with ASCVD events on traditional Cox modelling (hazard ratio [HR] 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-8.91; p<0.01) and competing risks analysis (HR 4.23; 95% CI 1.87-9.60; p<0.01). A total of 17 patients developed ASCVD events after ICI cessation (median 1.4 years). Among those with ASCVD events, 12 had prior ASCVD, 16 had hypertension, nine had hypercholesterolaemia, and four had diabetes, and nine were actively smoking. Variable prescription of cardiovascular preventative therapies was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

History of ASCVD was associated with subsequent ASCVD events among patients treated with ICIs, which could occur even after active treatment was stopped. Identification and aggressive management of modifiable CVRFs should be considered throughout cancer survivorship in patients who received ICI treatment.

When Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Intersect: The Challenge and the Opportunity of Cardio-Oncology

Cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) commonly coexist, with increasing evidence that long-term cancer survivors are more likely to die from CVD than the general population. Effective management of CVD and its risk factors requires identification of patients at increased risk who may benefit from early intervention and their appropriate monitoring across the disease trajectory. Improving outcomes requires new models of multidisciplinary cancer care supported by care pathways. Such pathways require a clear delineation of the roles and responsibilities of all team members and provision of appropriate enablers for their delivery. These include accessible point-of-care tools/risk calculators, patient resources, and the provision of tailored training opportunities for health care providers.

New targets and mechanisms of action for lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory therapies in atherosclerosis: where does the field stand?

INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite widespread use of statins. There is a need to develop additional therapeutic strategies that will complement statins to achieve more effective reductions in cardiovascular risk.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive summary of current areas of therapeutic development targeting both lipid and inflammatory factors implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. In addition to develop of novel approaches that will produce more effective lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, clinical trials are currently evaluating the potential to target other atherogenic lipid parameters such as triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and Lp(a), in addition to promoting the biological properties of high-density lipoproteins. Targeting inflammation within the vascular wall has emerged as a new frontier in cardiovascular prevention, with early evidence that use of anti-inflammatory agents have the potential to reduce cardiovascular risk.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical practice has an increasing array of therapeutic tools to achieve more effective lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for high-risk patients. In addition, clinical trials have the potential to deliver a range of additional agents to the clinic, that target alternative lipid and inflammatory mediators. This will permit the potential to personalize cardiovascular prevention.