MicroRNA-based signatures impacting clinical course and biology of ovarian cancer: a miRNOmics study

Background

In Western countries, ovarian cancer (OC) still represents the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths, despite the remarkable gains in therapeutical options. Novel biomarkers of early diagnosis, prognosis definition and prediction of treatment outcomes are of pivotal importance. Prior studies have shown the potentials of micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNAs) as biomarkers for OC and other cancers.

Methods

We focused on the prognostic and/or predictive potential of miRNAs in OC by conducting a comprehensive array profiling of miRNA expression levels in ovarian tissue samples from 17 non-neoplastic controls, and 60 tumor samples from OC patients treated at the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRE). A set of 54 miRNAs with differential expression in tumor versus normal samples (T/N-deregulated) was identified in the IRE cohort and validated against data from the Cancer Genoma Atlas (TCGA) related to 563 OC patients and 8 non-neoplastic controls. The prognostic/predictive role of the selected 54 biomarkers was tested in reference to survival endpoints and platinum resistance (P-res).

Results

In the IRE cohort, downregulation of the 2 miRNA-signature including miR-99a-5p and miR-320a held a negative prognostic relevance, while upregulation of miR-224-5p was predictive of less favorable event free survival (EFS) and P-res. Data from the TCGA showed that downregulation of 5 miRNAs, i.e., miR-150, miR-30d, miR-342, miR-424, and miR-502, was associated with more favorable EFS and overall survival outcomes, while miR-200a upregulation was predictive of P-res. The 9 miRNAs globally identified were all included into a single biologic signature, which was tested in enrichment analysis using predicted/validated miRNA target genes, followed by network representation of the miRNA-mRNA interactions.

Conclusions

Specific dysregulated microRNA sets in tumor tissue showed predictive/prognostic value in OC, and resulted in a promising biological signature for this disease.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00289-6.

Eribulin in combination with bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line therapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab: a multicenter, phase II, single arm trial (GIM11-BERGI)

Background

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin plus the humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients progressing after first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Patients and methods

This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, considered as the sum of partial and complete response based on the best overall response rate (BORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate.

Results

A total of 58 of the 61 patients enrolled in the study were evaluable for efficacy. The BORR was 24.6% (95% CI 14.5-37.3). The clinical benefit rate was 32.8% (95% CI 21.3-46.0). The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.0-7.8), and median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12.6-22.8). Overall, adverse events (AEs) were clinically manageable and the most common AEs were fatigue, paresthesia, and neutropenia. Quality of life was well preserved in most patients.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that second-line therapy with bevacizumab in combination with eribulin has a meaningful clinical activity and may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC.

•

Bevacizumab + chemotherapy improved progression-free survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

•

Eribulin monotherapy improved overall survival in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC.

•

The GIM11-BERGI trial assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin + bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-MBC.

•

Eribulin + bevacizumab showed to be a safe and active treatment after progression to first-line paclitaxel + bevacizumab.

Immunotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

Breast cancer (BC) is a complex disease with primary or acquired incurability characteristics in a significant part of patients. Immunotherapeutical agents represent an emerging option for breast cancer treatment, including the human epidermal growth factor 2 positive (HER2+) subtype. The immune system holds the ability to spontaneously implement a defensive response against HER2+ BC cells through complex mechanisms which can be exploited to modulate this response for obtaining a clinical benefit. Initial immune system modulating strategies consisted mostly in vaccine therapies, which are still being investigated and improved. However, the entrance of trastuzumab into the scenery of HER2+ BC treatment was the real game changing event, which embodied a dominant immune-mediated mechanism. More recently, the advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitors has caused a new paradigm shift for immuno-oncology, with promising initial results also for HER2+ BC. Breast cancer has been traditionally considered poorly immunogenic, being characterized by relatively low tumor mutation burden (TMB). Nevertheless, recent evidence has revealed high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in a considerable proportion of HER2+ BC patients. This may translate into a higher potential to elicit anti-cancer response and, therefore, wider possibilities for the use and implementation of immunotherapy in this subset of BC patients. We are herein presenting and critically discussing the most representative evidence concerning immunotherapy in HER2+ BC cancer, both singularly and in combination with therapeutic agents acting throughout HER2-block, immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-cancer vaccines. The reader will be also provided with hints concerning potential future projection of the most promising immutherapeutic agents and approaches for the disease of interest.

Abstract P6-21-13: A phase II single arm trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after first-line therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel

Background: At present, there is no standard second-line chemotherapy-based treatment in patients with HER2-negative MBC. Continued VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab is a new potential option in patients progressing to first line bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Eribulin is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, with a unique mechanism of action and suggested beneficial effects on tumor microenvironment and neoangiogenesis. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of eribulin plus bevacizumab as a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme, in patients progressing after first line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Methods: This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, Phase II study. Patients with HER2-negative MBC progressing to paclitaxel and bevacizumab received eribulin (1.23 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously), as second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), considered as sum of partial (PR) and complete response (CR), basing on the best overall response. The present safety and efficacy analyses, as planned per study design, refer to six cycles of treatment (18 weeks).

Results: Among the 61 patients enrolled in the study, 55 (90,2% ) were evaluable for efficacy. ORR (PR/CR) was 9.1% [95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 3.0 to 19.9]; stable disease (SD) rate was 63.6% [95% C.I. 49.6 to 76.2]; clinical benefit rate (CR/PR/SD) at 24 weeks was 35% [95% C.I. 22.0 to 49.1]. The median progression free survival was 6.3 months [95% C.I. 4.1 to 7.8 months]. Drugs-related adverse events (AEs) were: 49.5% related to eribulin, 7.7% related to bevacizumab, and 11.8% related to both the study drugs. The most common AEs were fatigue (9.9% of all AEs), paresthesia (6.5% of all AEs) and neutropenia (6.2% of all AEs). Quality of life was well preserved among the majority of patients.

Conclusions: The results of our trial suggest that continuing bevacizumab in combination with eribulin, beyond first line treatment with bevacizumab and paclitaxel, offers a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, without detrimentally affecting quality of life.

Citation Format: De Placido S, De Laurentiis M, Bruzzese D, Bernardo A, Baldini EE, Montesarchio V, Fabi A, Gamucci T, De Placido P, Russo S, Lauria R, De Santo I, De Angelis C, Del Mastro L, Giuliano M, Arpino G. A phase II single arm trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after first-line therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-13.

Increasing dose of Continuous Infusion Ifosfamide and Fixed dose of Bolus Epirubicin in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. A Study of the Italian Group on Rare Tumors

Purpose

To evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of ifosfamide when given as a continuous infusion and in combination with fixed doses of bolus 4′-epidoxorubicin in advanced previously untreated adult soft tissue sarcoma patients.

Methods

Treatment consisted of epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2 days one and two, and ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2 every 12 hrs as a 72-hr infusion, at the first level. Further levels of ifosfamide were defined as increments of 12 hrs of the same infusion program. G-CSF 300 μg/die was administered from days +7 to +14. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: G4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia of ≥5 days; any G3 neuro or nephrotoxicity; G4 toxicity of any kind. Patients had to complete at least 2 consecutive cycles, and MTD was defined as the level in which 20% of patients developed a DLT; 10-15 patients were entered in each level.

Results

First level: overall, 13 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD, and only one developed a DLT. Second level: 18 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD. Hematologic DLT was observed in 3/15 assessable patients. Therefore, the MTD was found at the ifosfamide level of 10.5 g/m2 given in 84 hrs. Eight patients of 29 assessable for response achieved an objective response: 1 complete and 7 partial. The overall response rate was 28% (95% CI: 13-47%).

Conclusions

If we accept 4-day G4 leukopenia as a reliable cutoff for safety, ifosfamide intensification cannot be substantially exploited over already available schedules with the combination of ifosfamide and anthracyclines.

Cardiotoxicity of 5-Fluorouracil

A case is reported of cardiotoxicity during a multiple drug treatment with fluorouracil, vincristine and CCNU in a patient with a large bowel cancer without any precedent history of heart disease. The patient had chest pain, with an altered ECG and increased serum levels of αHBDH.

Abstract P1-09-12: Dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: Differential treatment effects according to composite index of benefit

Background In patients with node-positive early breast cancer (EBC), dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (DFS) compared with standard interval chemotherapy. The GIM2 trial supports the value of dose-dense chemotherapy and suggests that the benefit is present in patients with hormone receptor-negative or hormone receptor-positive tumours (Del Mastro et al. Lancet 2015). In order to individualize decision making, there is a need to examine the absolute treatment effects of dose dense chemotherapy according to patient and tumor characteristics.

Patients and Methods The randomized phase III GIM2 trial enrolled 2091 patients. The primary endpoint was DFS. A continuous, composite measure of treatment benefit for each patient was determined from a Cox model incorporating potential predictive factors (age: 25-40/41-55/56-71; histological grade: 1+2/3; hormonal receptor status: positive/negative). Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology was used to reveal differential treatment effects on DFS according to composite index. The study focused on patients with HER2–negative disease (N=1287).

Results On average, the magnitude of benefit with dose dense chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy ranged widely across different subpopulations, as quantified by the composite measure of relevant variables. The highest benefit was observed in patients with high grade, hormone receptor-negative disease (hazard ratio for DFS 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83). Of note, a relevant benefit was observed also in patients with high grade, hormone receptor-positive disease (hazard ratio for DFS 0.74, 95% CI 0.50-1.09).

Conclusion The absolute improvement in DFS with dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy is substantial in some patients with node-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, particularly those regarded as having high index risk (hormone receptor-negative, high grade disease). Interestingly, a significant effect of dose dense chemotherapy was observed also in patients with hormone receptor-positive, high grade disease.

Citation Format: Puglisi F, Ceppi M, Cognetti F, De Placido S, Bruzzi P, De Laurentiis M, Bisagni G, Cavazzini G, Durando A, Turletti A, Valle E, Montemurro F, Barni S, Ardizzoni A, Gamucci T, Colantuoni G, Del Mastro L. Dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: Differential treatment effects according to composite index of benefit [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-12.

Targeting immune response with therapeutic vaccines in premalignant lesions and cervical cancer: hope or reality from clinical studies

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is widely known as a cause of cervical cancer (CC) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). HPVs related to cancer express two main oncogenes, i.e. E6 and E7, considered as tumorigenic genes; their integration into the host genome results in the abnormal regulation of cell cycle control. Due to their peculiarities, these oncogenes represent an excellent target for cancer immunotherapy. In this work the authors highlight the potential use of therapeutic vaccines as safe and effective pharmacological tools in cervical disease, focusing on vaccines that have reached the clinical trial phase. Many therapeutic HPV vaccines have been tested in clinical trials with promising results. Adoptive T-cell therapy showed clinical activity in a phase II trial involving advanced CC patients. A phase II randomized trial showed clinical activity of a nucleic acid-based vaccine in HPV16 or HPV18 positive CIN. Several trials involving peptide-protein-based vaccines and live-vector based vaccines demonstrated that these approaches are effective in CIN as well as in advanced CC patients. HPV therapeutic vaccines must be regarded as a therapeutic option in cervical disease. The synergic combination of HPV therapeutic vaccines with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunomodulators or immune checkpoint inhibitors opens a new and interesting scenario in this disease.

Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids

BACKGROUND

Guidelines tend to consider morphine and morphine-like opioids comparable and interchangeable in the treatment of chronic cancer pain, but individual responses can vary. This study compared the analgesic efficacy, changes of therapy and safety profile over time of four strong opioids given for cancer pain.

PATIENT AND METHODS

In this four-arm multicenter, randomized, comparative, of superiority, phase IV trial, oncological patients with moderate to severe pain requiring WHO step III opioids were randomly assigned to receive oral morphine or oxycodone or transdermal fentanyl or buprenorphine for 28 days. At each visit, pain intensity, modifications of therapy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of nonresponders, meaning patients with worse or unchanged average pain intensity (API) between the first and last visit, measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. (NCT01809106).

RESULTS

Forty-four centers participated in the trial and recruited 520 patients. Worst pain intensity and API decreased over 4 weeks with no significant differences between drugs. Nonresponders ranged from 11.5% (morphine) to 14.4% (buprenorphine). Appreciable changes were made in the treatment schedules over time. Each group required increases in the daily dose, from 32.7% (morphine) to 121.2% (transdermal fentanyl). Patients requiring adjuvant analgesics ranged from 68.9% (morphine) to 81.6% (oxycodone), switches varied from 22.1% (morphine) to 12% (oxycodone), discontinuation of treatment from 27% ( morphine) to 14.5% (fentanyl). ADRs were similar except for effects on the nervous system, which significantly prevailed with morphine.

CONCLUSION

The main findings were the similarity in pain control, response rates and main adverse reactions among opioids. Changes in therapy schedules were notable over time. A considerable proportion of patients were nonresponders or poor responders.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01809106 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01809106?term=cerp&rank=2).

Prospective phase II trial of trabectedin in BRCA-mutated and/or BRCAness phenotype recurrent ovarian cancer patients: the MITO 15 trial

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggest that trabectedin is particularly effective in cells lacking functional homologous recombination repair mechanisms. A prospective phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of trabectedin in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer patients presenting BRCA mutation and/or BRCAness phenotype.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients with recurrent BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer and/or BRCAness phenotype (≥2 previous responses to platinum) were treated with trabectedin 1.3 mg/mq i.v. q 3 weeks. The activity of the drug with respect to BRCA mutational status and to a series of polymorphisms [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] involved in DNA gene repair was analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-four were evaluable for response; in the whole population, 4 complete and 33 partial responses were registered for an overall response rate (ORR) of 39.4. In the platinum-resistant (PR) and -sensitive (PS) population, an ORR of 31.2% and 47.8%, and an overall clinical benefit of 54.2% and 73.9%, respectively, were registered. In the whole series, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) was 72 weeks; PS patients showed a more favorable PFS and OS compared with PR patients. BRCA gene mutational status was available in 69 patients. There was no difference in ORR, PFS and OS according to BRCA 1-2 status nor any association between SNPs of genes involved in DNA repair and NER machinery and response to trabectedin was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data prospectively confirmed that the signature of 'repeated platinum sensitivity' identifies patients highly responsive to trabectedin. In this setting, the activity of trabectedin seems comparable to what could be obtained using platinum compounds and the drug may represent a valuable alternative option in patients who present contraindication to receive platinum.

EUDRACT NUMBER

2011-001298-17.