Statins did not reduce the frequency of exacerbations in individuals with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities in the COSYCONET cohort

BACKGROUND

The evidence regarding effects of statins on exacerbation risk in COPD remains controversial. Previous studies often excluded patients with cardiovascular comorbidities despite their high prevalence in COPD and role for exacerbations. Based on the cardioprotective properties of statins, we hypothesised that statins may reduce the risk of exacerbations especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred eighty seven patients of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network) of GOLD grades 1-4 (37.8% female, mean age 64.78 ± 8.3) were examined at baseline and over a period of 4.5 years for the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or severe exacerbation per year in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses adjusted for age, gender, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. Due to their collinearity, various cardiovascular diseases were tested in separate analyses, whereby the potential effect of statins in the presence of a specific comorbidity was tested as interaction between statins and comorbidity. We also identified patients who never took statins, always took statins, or initiated statin intake during the follow-up.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred six patients never took statins, 31.6% were statin user, and 12.9% initiated statins during the follow-up. Most cardiovascular diseases were significantly (p < 0.05)may associated with an increased risk of COPD exacerbations, but in none of them the intake of statins was a significant attenuating factor, neither overall nor in modulating the increased risk linked to the specific comorbidities. The results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were consistent with each other, also those regarding at least 1 exacerbation or at least 1 severe exacerbation per year.

CONCLUSION

These findings complement the existing literature and may suggest that even in patients with COPD, cardiovascular comorbidities and a statin therapy that targets these comorbidities, the effects of statins on exacerbation risk are either negligible or more subtle than a reduction in exacerbation frequency.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01245933. Other Study ID (BMBF grant): 01GI0881, registered 18 November 2010, study start 2010-11, primary completion 2013-12, study completion 2023-09. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01245933?cond=COPD&term=COSYCONET&rank=3.

Association between lung function and dyspnoea and its variation in the multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study

BACKGROUND

Dyspnoea is a common symptom of respiratory disease. However, data on its prevalence in general populations and its association with lung function are limited and are mainly from high-income countries. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of dyspnoea across several world regions, and to investigate the association of dyspnoea with lung function.

METHODS

Dyspnoea was assessed, and lung function measured in 25,806 adult participants of the multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Dyspnoea was defined as ≥2 on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. The prevalence of dyspnoea was estimated for each of the study sites and compared across countries and world regions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of dyspnoea with lung function in each site. Results were then pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of dyspnoea varied widely across sites without a clear geographical pattern. The mean prevalence of dyspnoea was 13.7 % (SD=8.2 %), ranging from 0 % in Mysore (India) to 28.8 % in Nampicuan-Talugtug (Philippines). Dyspnoea was strongly associated with both spirometry restriction (FVC

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of dyspnoea varies substantially across the world and is strongly associated with lung function impairment. Using the mMRC scale in epidemiological research should be discussed.

Collapse

Key Words

• Breathlessness
• Dyspnoea
• Lung function
• Spirometry

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Atrial fibrillation and survival on a medical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and can be triggered by severe illness or preexisting conditions. It is debated if AF is an independent predictor of poor outcome.

METHODS

Data derives from a single center retrospective registry including all patients with a stay on the medical ICU for >24 h. The primary endpoint was ICU survival. Secondary endpoints included receiving mechanical support (renal, respiratory or circulatory), hemodynamic parameters during AF, rate and rhythm control strategies, anticoagulation, and documentation.

RESULTS

A total of 616 patients (male gender 62.3%, median age 75 years) were included in our analysis. New-onset AF was diagnosed in 87 patients (14.1%), 136 (22.1%) presented with preexisting AF, and 393 (63.8%) did not develop AF. Initial episodes of new-onset AF exhibited higher hemodynamic instability than episodes in preexisting cases, with elevated heart rates and increased catecholamine doses (both p < 0.001). ICU survival in new-onset AF was 80.5% (70/87) compared to 92.4% (363/393) in patients without AF (OR 0.340, CI 0.182-0.658, p < 0.001). Likewise, ICU survival in preexisting AF was 86.8% (118/136) was significantly lower compared to no AF (OR 0.542, CI 0.290-0.986, p = 0.050*). Independent predictors of ICU survival for patients were atrial fibrillation (p = 0.016), resuscitation before or during ICU stay (p < 0.001), and receiving acute dialysis on ICU (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

ICU survival is noticeably lower in patients with new-onset or preexisting atrial fibrillation compared to those without. Patients who develop new-onset AF during their ICU stay warrant special attention for both short-term and long-term care strategies.

Midregional proatrial naturetic peptide (MRproANP) and copeptin (COPAVP) as predictors of all-cause mortality in recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD-results from COSYCONET

BACKGROUND

MRproANP and COPAVP are prognostic markers for mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Furthermore, these biomarkers predict mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, which are important prognostically determining comorbidities in patients with COPD. However, less is known about these biomarkers in recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD. Therefore, we analyzed these biomarkers as potential predictors of mortality in recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD.

METHODS

The blood biomarkers considered were copeptin (COPAVP), midregional adrenomedullin (MRproADM), midregional proatrial naturetic peptide (MRproANP), and fibrinogen. Analyses were performed in patients with stable "recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD" defined by GOLD grades 0-2 and diagnosis of COPD ≤ 5 years prior to inclusion into the COSYCONET cohort (COPD and Systemic Consequences-Comorbidities Network), using Cox regression analysis with stepwise adjustment for multiple COPD characteristics, comorbidities, troponin and NT-proBNP.

RESULTS

655 patients with recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD were included. In the initial regression model, 43 of 655 patients died during the 6-year follow-up, in the final model 27 of 487. Regression analyses with adjustment for confounders identified COPAVP and MRproANP as statistically robust biomarkers (p < 0.05 each) of all-cause mortality, while MRproADM and fibrinogen were not. The fourth quartile of MRproANP (97 pmol/L) was associated with a hazard ratio of 4.5 (95%CI: 1.6; 12.8), and the fourth quartile of COPAVP (9.2 pmol/L) with 3.0 (1.1; 8.0). The results for MRproANP were confirmed in the total cohort of grade 0-4 (n = 1470 finally).

CONCLUSION

In patients with recently diagnosed mild to moderate COPD, elevated values of COPVP and in particular MRproANP were robust, independent biomarkers for all-cause mortality risk after adjustment for multiple other factors. This suggests that these markers might be considered in the risk assessment of early COPD.

Variances in Humoral Responses to Different Spike Protein Domains After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Lung and Heart Transplant Recipients

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Recommendations for treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 : Version 3 S1 guideline

Since December 2019 a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread around the world resulting in an acute respiratory illness pandemic. The immense challenges for clinicians and hospitals as well as the strain on many healthcare systems has been unprecedented.The majority of patients present with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, 5-8% become critically ill and require intensive care treatment. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with severe dyspnea and an increased respiratory rate (>30/min) usually leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At this point bilateral pulmonary infiltrates are typically seen. Patients often develop a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).So far, remdesivir and dexamethasone have shown clinical effectiveness in severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The main goal of supportive treatment is to ascertain adequate oxygenation. Invasive mechanical ventilation and repeated prone positioning are key elements in treating severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.Strict adherence to basic infection control measures (including hand hygiene) and correct use of personal protection equipment (PPE) are essential in the care of patients. Procedures that lead to formation of aerosols should be carried out with utmost precaution and preparation.

[Management of Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Prevention - Update 2021 - Guideline of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy (PEG), the German Society for Infectious Diseases (DGI), the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN), the German Viological Society (DGV), the Competence Network CAPNETZ, the German College of General Practitioneers and Family Physicians (DEGAM), the German Society for Geriatric Medicine (DGG), the German Palliative Society (DGP), the Austrian Society of Pneumology Society (ÖGP), the Austrian Society for Infectious and Tropical Diseases (ÖGIT), the Swiss Respiratory Society (SGP) and the Swiss Society for Infectious Diseases Society (SSI)]

The present guideline provides a new and updated concept of the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia. It replaces the previous guideline dating from 2016.The guideline was worked out and agreed on following the standards of methodology of a S3-guideline. This includes a systematic literature search and grading, a structured discussion of recommendations supported by the literature as well as the declaration and assessment of potential conflicts of interests.The guideline has a focus on specific clinical circumstances, an update on severity assessment, and includes recommendations for an individualized selection of antimicrobial treatment.The recommendations aim at the same time at a structured assessment of risk for adverse outcome as well as an early determination of treatment goals in order to reduce mortality in patients with curative treatment goal and to provide palliation for patients with treatment restrictions.

Shift in bacterial etiology from the CAPNETZ cohort in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: data over more than a decade

To determine the most relevant pathogens for CAP in Germany, patients with radiologically confirmed pulmonary infiltrates and at least one clinical sign of lung infection were prospectively recruited within the CAPNETZ cohort from 2004 until 2016. In 990 out of 4.672 patients (21%) receiving complete diagnostics the most prominent change of pathogens was a decrease of S. pneumoniae (58% in 2004 to 37.5% in 2016; p ≤ 0.001, ρ =  − 0.148) and an increase of H. influenzae (12.2% to 20.8%; p = 0.001, ρ = 0.104).

[S2k Guideline - Recommendations for Inpatient Therapy of Patients with COVID-19]

Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Corona Virus-2) has been spreading rapidly in the sense of a global pandemic. This poses significant challenges for clinicians and hospitals and is placing unprecedented strain on the healthcare systems of many countries. The majority of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) present with only mild symptoms such as cough and fever. However, about 6 % require hospitalization. Early clarification of whether inpatient and, if necessary, intensive care treatment is medically appropriate and desired by the patient is of particular importance in the pandemic. Acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency with dyspnea and high respiratory rate (> 30/min) usually leads to admission to the intensive care unit. Often, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates/consolidations or even pulmonary emboli are already found on imaging. As the disease progresses, some of these patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mortality reduction of available drug therapy in severe COVID-19 disease has only been demonstrated for dexamethasone in randomized controlled trials. The main goal of supportive therapy is to ensure adequate oxygenation. In this regard, invasive ventilation and repeated prone positioning are important elements in the treatment of severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. Strict adherence to basic hygiene, including hand hygiene, and the correct wearing of adequate personal protective equipment are essential when handling patients. Medically necessary actions on patients that could result in aerosol formation should be performed with extreme care and preparation.

[German recommendations for treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19-version 3]

Seit Dezember 2019 verbreitet sich das neuartige Coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Corona Virus-2) rasch im Sinne einer weltweiten Pandemie. Dies stellt Kliniker und Krankenhäuser vor große Herausforderungen und belastet die Gesundheitssysteme vieler Länder in einem nie dagewesenen Ausmaß. Die Mehrheit der Patienten zeigt lediglich milde Symptome der sogenannten Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dennoch benötigen etwa 5–8 % eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung. Die akute hypoxämische respiratorische Insuffizienz mit Dyspnoe und hoher Atemfrequenz (>30/Min) führt in der Regel zur Aufnahme auf die Intensivstation. Oft finden sich dann bereits bilaterale pulmonale Infiltrate/Konsolidierungen oder auch Lungenembolien in der Bildgebung. Im weiteren Verlauf entwickeln viele Patienten ein Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Eine klinische Wirksamkeit einer medikamentösen Therapie bei schwerer COVID-Erkrankung (hospitalisierte Patienten) ist bisher für Remdesivir und Dexamethason nachgewiesen. Das Hauptziel der supportiven Therapie ist es eine ausreichende Oxygenierung sicherzustellen. Die invasive Beatmung und wiederholte Bauchlagerung sind dabei wichtige Elemente in der Behandlung von schwer hypoxämischen COVID-19 Patienten. Die strikte Einhaltung der Basishygiene, einschließlich der Händehygiene, sowie das korrekte Tragen von adäquater persönlicher Schutzausrüstung sind im Umgang mit den Patienten unabdingbar. Prozeduren, die zur Aerosolbildung führen könnten, sollten falls nötig, mit äußerster Sorgfalt und Vorbereitung durchgeführt werden.

[German recommendations for treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19-version 3 : S1-guideline]

Seit Dezember 2019 verbreitet sich das neuartige Coronavirus SARS-CoV‑2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Corona Virus-2) rasch im Sinne einer weltweiten Pandemie. Dies stellt Kliniker und Krankenhäuser vor große Herausforderungen und belastet die Gesundheitssysteme vieler Länder in einem nie dagewesenen Ausmaß. Die Mehrheit der Patienten zeigt lediglich milde Symptome der sogenannten Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dennoch benötigen etwa 5–8 % eine intensivmedizinische Behandlung. Die akute hypoxämische respiratorische Insuffizienz mit Dyspnoe und hoher Atemfrequenz (>30/Min) führt in der Regel zur Aufnahme auf die Intensivstation. Oft finden sich dann bereits bilaterale pulmonale Infiltrate/Konsolidierungen oder auch Lungenembolien in der Bildgebung. Im weiteren Verlauf entwickeln viele Patienten ein Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Eine klinische Wirksamkeit einer medikamentösen Therapie bei schwerer COVID-Erkrankung (hospitalisierte Patienten) ist bisher für Remdesivir und Dexamethason nachgewiesen. Das Hauptziel der supportiven Therapie ist es eine ausreichende Oxygenierung sicherzustellen. Die invasive Beatmung und wiederholte Bauchlagerung sind dabei wichtige Elemente in der Behandlung von schwer hypoxämischen COVID-19 Patienten. Die strikte Einhaltung der Basishygiene, einschließlich der Händehygiene, sowie das korrekte Tragen von adäquater persönlicher Schutzausrüstung sind im Umgang mit den Patienten unabdingbar. Prozeduren, die zur Aerosolbildung führen könnten, sollten falls nötig, mit äußerster Sorgfalt und Vorbereitung durchgeführt werden.

[Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis with Pulmonary and Cardiac Involvement]

A 62-year-old patient with bronchial asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis underwent inguinal hernia surgery. After the operation, sudden circulatory arrest occurred, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Coronary angiography revealed a 99 % proximal stenosis of right coronary artery (RCA) with unsuspicious and smooth coronary vessel walls. In the further course, several similar events occurred, but without pathological findings in the coronary angiography. Initially, echocardiography showed slightly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 45 %. Chest radiography revealed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, and white blood cell count showed severe eosinophilia (37 %). Serological antibody testing including ANA, ENA and c-/p-ANCA was negative. Myeloproliferative pathologies were excluded by bone marrow puncture. The patient suffered from emerging dyspnea, weakness, and ongoing weight loss. A methylprednisolone pulse of 250 mg/d for 3 days remained without significant effect, so that the patient was eventually referred to our university hospital due to ongoing clinical deterioration. On admission, the patient suffered from weakness, progressive muscular atrophy, and dyspnea on exertion. Physical examination revealed a right-sided peroneal paralysis. Bronchial lavage detected severe eosinophil alveolitis (37 %), and laboratory findings showed elevated cardiac enzymes and NT-proBNP (Troponin-T > 700 ng/l, NT-proBNP > 10.000 ng/l). Echocardiography revealed a dramatic deterioration of cardiac function (LVEF 16 %). Interdisciplinary discussion between pulmonologists and cardiologists lead to the diagnosis of ANCA-negative eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) with pulmonary and cardiac involvement. Initiation of immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone 1000 mg/d for 3 days followed by cyclophosphamide therapy (6 pulses, administered every 4 weeks) led to substantial symptomatic improvement, complete regression of pulmonary infiltrates and marked recovery of cardiac function (LVEF 47 %). CONCLUSION:  Serological detection of elevated ANCAs is not necessary for diagnosis of EGPA. Only 30 - 70 % of patients are positive for these, particularly if neurological and/or renal rather than cardiac and/or pulmonary involvement is present. This may be a pitfall in establishing the correct diagnosis. Induction therapy with cyclophosphamide is the preferred treatment for steroid-refractory EGPA with life-threatening organ involvement.