In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents Compared With a Matched Group of Patients With De Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis

Drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, ISR still exists in the contemporary DES era. Previously deemed to be a benign process, ISR leads to complex presentation and intervention. This study aimed to compare the presentation and outcome of DES-ISR versus de novo lesions. We performed a retrospective analysis of 11,666 patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention from 2003 to 2017 and divided them into 2 groups by de novo stenosis and ISR. They were matched based on common cardiovascular risk factors at a 4:1 ratio, respectively. After matching, a total of 1,888 patients with 3,126 de novo lesions and 472 patients with 508 ISR lesions were analyzed. Patients with ISR presented more often with unstable angina (61% vs 45%, p <0.001) and less often with myocardial infarction (6% vs 14%, p <0.001). One-year composite major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, was 10% in the de novo group and 17% in the ISR group (hazard ratio 1.98, 95% confidential interval 1.58 to 2.46, p <0.001). After adjusting for myocardial infarction presentation, hazard ratio of major adverse cardiovascular events was still higher for the ISR group at 1 year (2.03, 95% confidential interval 1.62 to 2.55, p <0.001). ISR of DES remains a therapeutic challenge and leads to complex presentation and worse outcomes compared with matched de novo patients. These data show that DES-ISR demands better appreciation and prevention with more precise stent technique and should motivate the continued development of fully bioresorbable scaffolds.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary saphenous vein graft interventions in the drug-eluting stent era

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare early and late clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients who underwent saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with the use of drug-eluting stents (DES).

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus are shown to have less favorable outcomes after SVG intervention with the use of bare metal stents. In the DES era, the impact of diabetes mellitus on restenosis and clinical outcomes post-SVG intervention is not clearly defined.

METHODS

From our institutional PCI registry database, we retrospectively analyzed 477 consecutive patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery undergoing SVG PCI with the implantation of DES stratified by the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. The primary end-point was 1-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate, defined as death, Q wave myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics, including mean graft age (120 ± 77 vs. 131 ± 86 months, P = 0.14), were similar between groups, save for a higher prevalence of systemic hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency, and higher body mass index in the diabetic group. Among the 604 SVG lesions treated with DES, the angiographic and procedural characteristics were well matched between groups except for the higher rate of distal protection device use (32% vs. 29%, P = 0.007) in the diabetic group. The rates of 1-year MACE (21% vs. 15%, P = 0.12) and all-cause mortality (7.6% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.86) were similar between groups. After adjustment for the relevant clinical co-variables, diabetic status was not associated with the composite end-point.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, DES, when used for the treatment of vein graft lesions, equate the short- and long-term outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic patients, suggesting that DES should be considered the default stent in diabetic populations undergoing PCI for the treatment of SVG lesions.

Frequency of Angina Pectoris After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the Effect of Metallic Stent Type

Although metallic coronary stents significantly reduce angina pectoris compared with optimal medical therapy, angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains frequent. We, therefore, sought to compare the incidence of any angina during the 1 year after PCI among the spectrum of commercially available metallic stents. Metallic stent type was classified as bare metal stent, Cypher, Taxus Express, Xience V, Promus Element, and Resolute. The primary end point was patient-reported angina within 1 year of PCI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association of stent type with any angina at 1 year. Overall, 8,804 patients were queried in regard to angina symptoms; 32.3% experienced angina at some point in the first year after PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, and Q-wave myocardial infarction, increased with angina severity: 6.8% for patients without angina, 10.0% for patients with class 1 or 2 angina, and 19.7% for patients with class 3 or 4 angina (p <0.001 for trend). After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between stent type and angina at 1 year after PCI. Baseline Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3 or 4 angina, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, and history of PCI were associated with a higher likelihood of angina at 1 year; increasing age, male gender, presentation with acute coronary syndrome, and higher stented length were associated with less angina. In conclusion, metallic stent type is not associated with the occurrence of angina at up to 1 year after PCI.

Comparison of Rotational Atherectomy, Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty, and Cutting-Balloon Angioplasty Prior to Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesions

BACKGROUND

The optimal technique for lesion preparation in heavily calcified coronary lesions (HCCL) prior to drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has not been described. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy (ROTA), plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), or cutting-balloon angioplasty (CBA) in patients with HCCL who were treated with DES.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 737 consecutive patients (874 lesions) who underwent RA (n = 264), POBA (n = 220), or CBA (n = 253) for HCCL at our institution and were treated with DES. Patients with mild or moderate calcified lesions, restenotic lesions, treatment with bare-metal stent (BMS), or history of prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were excluded. The analyzed clinical parameters were the 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month rates of death (all-cause and cardiac), Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), definite stent thrombosis (ST), and major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or TLR.

RESULTS

The patients were well matched for their baseline characteristics except for age (RA = 71.9 ± 10.4 years; POBA = 68.0 ± 10.8 years; CBA = 68.7 ± 11.8 years; P<.001) and hypertension (RA = 90.9%; POBA = 80.9%; CBA = 84.2%; P=.01), which were different among the three cohorts. The three cohorts had similar clinical outcomes at both short-term and long-term follow-up. The 12-month results were all-cause death (RA = 9.8%; POBA = 8.2%; CBA = 4.5%; P=.18), cardiac death (RA = 3.1%; POBA = 2.5%; CBA = 1.3%; P=.61), Q-wave MI (RA = 0%; POBA = 0%; CBA = 0.7%; P>.99), TLR (RA = 5.2%; POBA = 3.5%; CBA = 3.9%; P=.76), ST (RA = 0%; POBA = 0%; CBA = 0.6%; P=.63) and MACE (RA = 14.6%; POBA = 12.3%; CBA = 8.3%; P=.20). The 1-year MACE-free survival rates were also similar among the three cohorts (log-rank P=.20).

CONCLUSION

A strategy of lesion preparation with RA, POBA, or CBA in HCCL may be associated with similar clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with DES. The RA group had a trend toward greater MACE, death, and TLR.

Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents compared with first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy everolimus-eluting stents (EES) compared with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

EES have been associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and with similar outcomes compared to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).

METHODS

A total of 520 patients who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 2003 to 2013, who underwent primary PCI with DES, were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 247 received SES, 136 PES, and 137 EES. Patients were followed up to 2 years for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Univariate and multivariate models detected correlates to outcome.

RESULTS

EES implantation, compared with PES and SES, resulted in comparable rates of MACE (8.8% vs. 16.2%, p=0.06 and 8.8% vs. 12.6%, respectively, p=0.26), stent thrombosis, MI, and target lesion revascularization. Patients who received EES had lower rates of all-cause mortality (3.7% vs. 12.6% vs. 9.4%, p=0.03) at 1-year follow up. However, in the univariate and multivariate analyses, stent type was not independently associated with the primary outcome or with all-cause mortality. Diabetes mellitus and number of stents implanted were independently associated with the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

While EES seem to be associated with better outcome when compared to PES, the main correlates of STEMI patients are the presence of diabetes and number of stents implanted, and not the type of stent used for intervention.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Across 3-Stent Generations

Background—

Clinical presentation of bare metal stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients undergoing target lesion revascularization is well characterized and negatively affects on outcomes, whereas the presentation and outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) remains under-reported.

Methods and Results—

The study included 909 patients (1077 ISR lesions) distributed as follows: bare metal stent (n=388), first-generation DES (n=425), and second-generation DES (n=96), categorized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or non-ACS presentation mode at the time of first target lesion revascularization. ACS was further classified as myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina. For bare metal stent, first-generation DES and second-generation DES, ACS was the clinical presentation in 67.8%, 71.0%, and 66.7% of patients, respectively ( P =0.470), whereas MI occurred in 10.6%, 10.1%, and 5.2% of patients, respectively ( P =0.273). The correlates for MI as ISR presentation were current smokers (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78–5.13; P <0.001), and chronic renal failure (odds ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.60–4.70; P <0.001), with a protective trend for the second-generation DES ISR (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12–1.03; P =0.060). ACS presentations had an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, and re-target lesion revascularization) at 6 months (MI versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.84–8.94; P <0.001; unstable angina versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.01–3.87; P =0.046).

Conclusions—

ISR clinical presentation is similar irrespective of stent type. MI as ISR presentation seems to be associated with patient and not device-related factors. ACS as ISR presentation has an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events, suggesting that ISR remains a hazard and should be minimized.